Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2017 Jan 3;3(1):10–15. doi: 10.1007/s40495-016-0079-5

The Opportunities of Metabolomics in Drug Safety Evaluation

Pengcheng Wang 1, Amina I Shehu 1, Xiaochao Ma 1,*
PMCID: PMC5526643  NIHMSID: NIHMS840360  PMID: 28758057

Abstract

Although safety of drug candidates is carefully monitored in preclinical and clinical studies using a variety of approaches, drug toxicity may still occur in clinical practice. Therefore, novel approaches are needed to complement the current drug safety evaluation system. Metabolomics comprehensively analyzes the metabolites altered by drug exposure, which can therefore be used to profile drug metabolism, endobiotic metabolism, and drug-microbiota interactions. The information from metabolomic analysis can be used to determine the off-targets of a drug candidate, and thus provide a mechanistic understanding of drug toxicity. We herein discuss the opportunities of metabolomics in drug safety evaluation.

Keywords: Metabolomics, drug metabolites, endobiotic metabolites, drug safety evaluation

Introduction

Despite great efforts and progress having been made in the field of drug safety evaluation, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remain a major concern in the clinic [1, 2]. The incidence of serious ADRs was 6.7% of hospitalized patients, out of which 0.32% are fatal ADRs [3]. The management of ADRs is a great burden for both patients and health providers [4]. Besides, drug toxicity remains a major cause of drug development failure during preclinical and clinical studies [1]. ADRs caused by a few drugs like acetaminophen (APAP) are dose-dependent and they can be predicted. However, many ADRs are idiosyncratic which makes them difficult to predict [5].

Drug safety evaluation is an important component of drug development and also a top priority for regulatory agencies. Safety evaluation is required across the whole process of drug development, from preclinical studies to clinical trials, as well as post-approval safety surveillance. Biochemical and histological analysis are the major approaches used for drug safety evaluation. These approaches are effective in most cases to determine the safety profile of drug candidates. However, limitations of these biochemical and histological approaches are obvious: (1) these methods have fallen short in preventing unsafe molecules from getting into the market, especially for toxicities that often originate from off-target effects; and (2) these methods cannot provide detailed information to identify unexpected targets and explore the mechanism of drug toxicity [6, 7]. Therefore, new strategies are needed for drug safety evaluation. Modern technologies have been adopted in the research field of drug toxicity, which include genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics [5, 8, 9]. There are excellent reviews focused on the applications of genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics in drug toxicity studies [5, 10-12]. This review will focus on the applications of metabolomics in drug safety research and evaluation.

Metabolomics is the comprehensive and quantitative analysis of all metabolites within a biological system [7, 13-15]. It illustrates the alteration of terminal metabolites and biochemical basis in response to stress [14]. Metabolomics has been successfully used for investigating toxicities of multiple drugs and xenobiotics (Table 1). The current review highlighted the power of metabolomics in profiling drug metabolism and bioactivation pathways, endobiotic homeostasis, drug-endobiotic interactions, and discussed their associations with drug toxicity.

Table 1.

Representative studies on drug and xenobiotic toxicity using metabolomics.

Drugs and xenobiotics Biological specimens Technological
platform
References
Ammonia, dimethylsulfoxide, APAP Bioartificial organs NMR [16]
Teratogens Human embryonic stem cells LC-MS [17, 18]
Flutamide, hydroxyflutamide HepG2/C3a cells NMR [19]
Amiodarone, clozapine, cyclosporine, doxycycline,
fluoxetine, tamoxifen, tert-Butyl hydroperoxide,
tetracycline, tilorone, valproic acid, ketotifen,
cumene hydroperoxide
HepG2 cells LC-MS [20, 21]
Nonylphenol Rat urine GC-MS [22]
Carbon tetrachloride, APAP, methotrexate Rat urine LC-MS [23]
APAP Mouse urine and serum; human
using and serum
LC-MS, NMR [24-27]
A wide range of model toxins including hydrazine Rat urine and serum NMR [28]
Green tea extract, APAP Mouse liver LC-MS, NMR [29]
MrkA Rat urine and liver NMR [30]
Carbon tetrachloride, α-naphthylisothiocyanate, 2-
bromoethylamine, 4-aminophenol
Rat serum NMR [31]
Gentamicin Rat urine NMR, LC-MS [32]
Hydrazine Rat urine NMR [33]
Griseofulvin Mouse liver LC-MS [34]
Doxorubicin, isoproterenol, 5-fluorouracil Rat plasma LC-MS [35]

GC, gas chromatography; LC, liquid chromatography; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy; MS, mass spectrometry.

Metabolomics for screening drug metabolism and bioactivation pathways

Most drugs undergo biotransformation once they enter the body. Based on the pharmacological and toxicological properties of drug metabolites, they can be classified into three types: active metabolites, inactive metabolites, and reactive metabolites [36]. The reactive metabolites can bind to cellular macromolecules, such as proteins and DNA, disrupt normal cellular functions, and lead to toxicity [37-39]. Therefore, screening of reactive metabolites is needed in the early stage of drug development [38-41]. Since reactive metabolites are unstable and sometimes unpredictable, they are hard to be detected and identified.

Metabolomics provides an efficient tool to profile drug metabolism and bioactivation, especially for the reactive and unexpected metabolites. The LC-MS-based metabolomic approach has been successfully used to profile reactive metabolites of pulegone (PLG), a hepatotoxin from a variety of plants [42, 43]. Glutathione (GSH) and semicarbazide were used to trap the reactive metabolites of PLG in human liver microsomes [37]. The principal component analysis (PCA) and the orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) conveniently identified PLG-GSH conjugates and PLG-hydrozones. Besides, PLG-pyridazine, an unpredicted adduct, was identified from the metabolomic analysis [37]. The LC-MS-based metabolomic approach has also been used to screen the bioactivation pathways of ritonavir (RTV) [44]. RTV is a critical component of protease inhibitor-based regimens for antiretroviral therapies [45]. RTV-containing regimens frequently cause liver injury [46-49]. Metabolomic analysis revealed twenty-six metabolites including five reactive metabolites that may be associated with RTV hepatotoxicity [44]. These findings suggest that metabolomics is a powerful and straightforward technical platform for investigating drug metabolism and bioactivation.

Metabolomics for profiling the effects of drugs on endobiotics homeostasis

Chemical insults may affect the equilibrium of endogenous metabolites in an organism because of on-target or off-target effects [50]. Metabolomics can recapture biochemical alterations of endobiotics and thus uncover drug targets. APAP is a widely used over-the-counter analgesic and antipyretic drug. APAP overdose causes serious liver injury, which accounts for nearly half of all cases of acute liver failure in the United States [51]. Depletion of endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH) and mitochondrial injury have been identified as critical steps in APAP hepatotoxicity [52]. A metabolomic approach was used to revisit the mechanisms of APAP hepatotoxicity, which found that GSH is the number one decreased ion in the liver of mice treated with APAP [37]. Metabolomics study also revealed the accumulation of acylcarnitines in the serum of mice treated with APAP, suggesting that APAP disrupts fatty acid oxidation in mitochondria [25, 53].

Both rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) are the first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs. Combined therapies with RIF and INH can cause liver injury and even liver failure [54]. Previous studies proposed that reactive metabolites and oxidative stress were associated with the hepatotoxicity of RIF and INH [55, 56], but the detailed mechanisms remain unknown [57]. A recent metabolomics study provided a novel insight into RIF and INH-induced liver injury through the interactions with endobiotics [58]. Since RIF is a human specific pregnane X receptor (PXR) ligand, PXR-humanized mice were used to investigate the hepatotoxicity associated with RIF and INH. Significant elevation of liver injury was only observed in PXR-humanized mice co-treated with RIF and INH, but not in wild-type mice and Pxr-null mice, suggesting that human PXR is the key modulator of liver injury in RIF and INH co-therapy [58]. Analysis of bile metabolome showed that co-treatment with RIF and INH in PXR-humanized mice caused a significant accumulation of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX), an intermediate in the heme biosynthesis pathway that can cause hepatocellular and cholestatic liver injury [59, 60]. Further studies found that both RIF and INH target on the heme biosynthesis pathways and lead to PPIX accumulation [58, 61].

Lipidomics focuses on measuring the alterations of cellular lipids on a large scale [62], which therefore provides an ideal tool to explore the effects of drug exposure on cellular lipid homeostasis. Inhibition of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and disruption of cellular lipid metabolism are associated with drug hepatotoxicity [63, 64]. Cocaine is a widely abused psychological stimulant that can cause liver injury in humans and mice [65, 66]. Lipidomics has been used to elucidate the mechanism of cocaine hepatotoxicity [67]. Treatment with cocaine in mice resulted in an accumulation of long-chain acylcarnitines in the liver, suggesting that cocaine can inhibit mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation [67]. This idea is supported by the fact that fenofibrate, a PPARα activator, increases mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and attenuates cocaine-induced liver injury [67].

The three cases discussed above illustrate the capability of metabolomics in identifying off-targets of drugs through profiling endogenous metabolites. This strategy may provide a novel avenue to investigate idiosyncratic ADRs. Idiosyncratic ADRs are usually not observed in clinical trials until a large population are exposed to the drug [68]. Individual differences in drug metabolism and immune response have been proposed as major mechanisms of idiosyncratic ADRs [69-72]. However, most cases of idiosyncratic ADRs cannot be explained by individual differences in drug metabolism and immune response. Therefore, novel concepts and techniques are needed to illustrate the mechanisms of idiosyncratic ADRs. For idiosyncratic ADRs, multiple risk factors have been found in clinical studies [50, 73, 74]. It is possible that a drug disturbs certain metabolic pathways of endobiotics in the body, and that the cofactors that double hit on these metabolic pathways will potentiate drug toxicity. Untargeted metabolomics provides an ideal tool to identify both drug-specific and patient-specific alterations of endobiotics, and thus may facilitate a mechanistic understanding of idiosyncratic ADRs.

Metabolomics for profiling drug-microbiota interactions

Aside from profiling drug-endobiotic interactions, metabolomics has been used to study drug-microbiota interactions [26, 75, 76]. Emerging evidences suggest that gut microbiome play critical roles in drug metabolism and toxicity [77-79]. Metabolomic analysis has found that p-cresol, a gut microbiota product, can affect APAP hepatotoxicity [26]. Further studies revealed that p-cresol is a substrate of sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1), which is also responsible for O-sulfonation of APAP [26]. Therefore, p-cresol competes with the detoxification pathway of APAP and potentiates APAP hepatotoxicity.

Summary and perspectives

After drug exposure, the major changes in metabolome are: (1) the accumulation of the drug and its metabolites; and (2) the alteration of a host’s endobiotics and metabolites of microbiota in response to a drug and its metabolites. Metabolomics can profile drug metabolism, drug-endobiotic interactions, and drug-microbiota interactions (Figure 1). The information obtained from metabolomic analysis can be used to determine the off-targets of a drug candidate, and thus provide a mechanistic understanding of drug toxicity. In summary, metabolomics has great opportunities to complement the current drug safety evaluation system.

Figure 1. The opportunities of metabolomics in drug safety evaluation.

Figure 1

Metabolomics can systematically profile drug metabolism, endobiotic metabolism, and drug-microbiota interactions. The information from metabolomic analysis can be used to illustrate drug targets and provide a mechanistic understanding of drug toxicity. The following analyses are recommended for use of metabolomics in drug safety evaluation: (1) metabolomic analysis of blood, urine, and feces from preclinical to clinical studies; and (2) metabolomic analysis of major organs in preclinical studies.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK090305]. We thank Dr. Jane Maddigan for proofreading our manuscript.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • [1].Waring MJ, Arrowsmith J, Leach AR, Leeson PD, Mandrell S, Owen RM, et al. An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:475–86. doi: 10.1038/nrd4609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Fung M, Thornton A, Mybeck K, Wu JH-h, Hornbuckle K, Muniz E. Evaluation of the characteristics of safety withdrawal of prescription drugs from worldwide pharmaceutical markets-1960 to 1999*. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:293–317. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.15.1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Wishart DS. Applications of metabolomics in drug discovery and development. Drugs in R & D. 2008;9:307–22. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200809050-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Wilke RA, Lin DW, Roden DM, Watkins PB, Flockhart D, Zineh I, et al. Identifying genetic risk factors for serious adverse drug reactions: current progress and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:904–16. doi: 10.1038/nrd2423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Raamsdonk LM, Teusink B, Broadhurst D, Zhang N, Hayes A, Walsh MC, et al. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nature biotechnology. 2001;19:45–50. doi: 10.1038/83496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Nicholson JK, Connelly J, Lindon JC, Holmes E. Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2002;1:153–61. doi: 10.1038/nrd728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Watkins PB. Biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury. Semin Liver Dis. 2009;29:393–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Gallagher WM, Tweats D, Koenig J. Omic profiling for drug safety assessment: current trends and public-private partnerships. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:337–42. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Urban TJ, Goldstein DB, Watkins PB. Genetic basis of susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury: what have we learned and where do we go from here? Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13:735–8. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Gao Y, Holland RD, Yu LR. Quantitative proteomics for drug toxicity. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2009;8:158–66. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elp006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Cui Y, Paules RS. Use of transcriptomics in understanding mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:573–85. doi: 10.2217/pgs.10.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Fiehn O. Metabolomics--the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;48:155–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Kaddurah-Daouk R, Kristal BS, Weinshilboum RM. Metabolomics: a global biochemical approach to drug response and disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:653–83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Nicholson JK, Connelly J, Lindon JC, Holmes E. Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1:153–61. doi: 10.1038/nrd728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Shintu L, Baudoin R, Navratil V, Prot JM, Pontoizeau C, Defernez M, et al. Metabolomics-on-a-chip and predictive systems toxicology in microfluidic bioartificial organs. Anal Chem. 2012;84:1840–8. doi: 10.1021/ac2011075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].West PR, Weir AM, Smith AM, Donley EL, Cezar GG. Predicting human developmental toxicity of pharmaceuticals using human embryonic stem cells and metabolomics. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;247:18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Kleinstreuer NC, Smith AM, West PR, Conard KR, Fontaine BR, Weir-Hauptman AM, et al. Identifying developmental toxicity pathways for a subset of ToxCast chemicals using human embryonic stem cells and metabolomics. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;257:111–21. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Choucha Snouber L, Bunescu A, Naudot M, Legallais C, Brochot C, Dumas ME, et al. Metabolomics-on-a-chip of hepatotoxicity induced by anticancer drug flutamide and Its active metabolite hydroxyflutamide using HepG2/C3a microfluidic biochips. Toxicol Sci. 2013;132:8–20. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Garcia-Canaveras JC, Jimenez N, Gomez-Lechon MJ, Castell JV, Donato MT, Lahoz A. LC-MS untargeted metabolomic analysis of drug-induced hepatotoxicity in HepG2 cells. Electrophoresis. 2015 doi: 10.1002/elps.201500095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Garcia-Canaveras JC, Castell JV, Donato MT, Lahoz A. A metabolomics cell-based approach for anticipating and investigating drug-induced liver injury. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27239. doi: 10.1038/srep27239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Lee SH, Woo HM, Jung BH, Lee J, Kwon OS, Pyo HS, et al. Metabolomic approach to evaluate the toxicological effects of nonylphenol with rat urine. Anal Chem. 2007;79:6102–10. doi: 10.1021/ac070237e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Kumar BS, Chung BC, Kwon OS, Jung BH. Discovery of common urinary biomarkers for hepatotoxicity induced by carbon tetrachloride, acetaminophen and methotrexate by mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. J Appl Toxicol. 2012;32:505–20. doi: 10.1002/jat.1746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Chen C, Krausz KW, Idle JR, Gonzalez FJ. Identification of novel toxicity-associated metabolites by metabolomics and mass isotopomer analysis of acetaminophen metabolism in wild-type and Cyp2e1-null mice. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:4543–59. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706299200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Chen C, Krausz KW, Shah YM, Idle JR, Gonzalez FJ. Serum metabolomics reveals irreversible inhibition of fatty acid beta-oxidation through the suppression of PPARalpha activation as a contributing mechanism of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22:699–707. doi: 10.1021/tx800464q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Clayton TA, Baker D, Lindon JC, Everett JR, Nicholson JK. Pharmacometabonomic identification of a significant host-microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human drug metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106:14728–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904489106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Bhattacharyya S, Yan K, Pence L, Simpson PM, Gill P, Letzig LG, et al. Targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of serum acylcarnitines in acetaminophen toxicity in children. Biomark Med. 2014;8:147–59. doi: 10.2217/bmm.13.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Lindon JC, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Antti H, Bollard ME, Keun H, et al. Contemporary issues in toxicology the role of metabonomics in toxicology and its evaluation by the COMET project. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003;187:137–46. doi: 10.1016/s0041-008x(02)00079-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Lu Y, Sun J, Petrova K, Yang X, Greenhaw J, Salminen WF, et al. Metabolomics evaluation of the effects of green tea extract on acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;62:707–21. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Mortishire-Smith RJ, Skiles GL, Lawrence JW, Spence S, Nicholls AW, Johnson BA, et al. Use of metabonomics to identify impaired fatty acid metabolism as the mechanism of a drug-induced toxicity. Chem Res Toxicol. 2004;17:165–73. doi: 10.1021/tx034123j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Robertson DG, Reily MD, Sigler RE, Wells DF, Paterson DA, Braden TK. Metabonomics: evaluation of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and pattern recognition technology for rapid in vivo screening of liver and kidney toxicants. Toxicol Sci. 2000;57:326–37. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/57.2.326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Lenz EM, Bright J, Knight R, Westwood FR, Davies D, Major H, et al. Metabonomics with 1H-NMR spectroscopy and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry applied to the investigation of metabolic changes caused by gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in the rat. Biomarkers. 2005;10:173–87. doi: 10.1080/13547500500094034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Garrod S, Bollard ME, Nicholls AW, Connor SC, Connelly J, Nicholson JK, et al. Integrated metabonomic analysis of the multiorgan effects of hydrazine toxicity in the rat. Chem Res Toxicol. 2005;18:115–22. doi: 10.1021/tx0498915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Liu K, Yan J, Sachar M, Zhang X, Guan M, Xie W, et al. A metabolomic perspective of griseofulvin-induced liver injury in mice. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;98:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Li Y, Ju L, Hou Z, Deng H, Zhang Z, Wang L, et al. Screening, verification, and optimization of biomarkers for early prediction of cardiotoxicity based on metabolomics. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:2437–45. doi: 10.1021/pr501116c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Testa B, Krämer S-D. The biochemistry of drug metabolism: Principles, redox reactions, hydrolyses. Wiley-VCH; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Li F, Lu J, Ma X. Profiling the reactive metabolites of xenobiotics using metabolomic technologies. Chemical research in toxicology. 2011;24:744–51. doi: 10.1021/tx200033v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Park BK, Boobis A, Clarke S, Goldring CE, Jones D, Kenna JG, et al. Managing the challenge of chemically reactive metabolites in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:292–306. doi: 10.1038/nrd3408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Stepan AF, Walker DP, Bauman J, Price DA, Baillie TA, Kalgutkar AS, et al. Structural alert/reactive metabolite concept as applied in medicinal chemistry to mitigate the risk of idiosyncratic drug toxicity: a perspective based on the critical examination of trends in the top 200 drugs marketed in the United States. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:1345–410. doi: 10.1021/tx200168d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Zhu M, Ma L, Zhang H, Humphreys WG. Detection and structural characterization of glutathione-trapped reactive metabolites using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and mass defect filtering. Anal Chem. 2007;79:8333–41. doi: 10.1021/ac071119u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Zhou S, Chan E, Duan W, Huang M, Chen Y-Z. Drug bioactivation covalent binding to target proteins and toxicity relevance. Drug Metab Rev. 2005;37:41–213. doi: 10.1081/dmr-200028812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Madyastha KM, Moorthy B. Pulegone mediated hepatotoxicity: evidence for covalent binding of R(+)-[14C]pulegone to microsomal proteins in vitro. Chem Biol Interact. 1989;72:325–33. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(89)90007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Thomassen D, Slattery JT, Nelson SD. Menthofuran-dependent and independent aspects of pulegone hepatotoxicity: roles of glutathione. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990;253:567–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Li F, Lu J, Ma X. Metabolomic screening and identification of the bioactivation pathways of ritonavir. Chemical Res Toxicol. 2011;24:2109–14. doi: 10.1021/tx2004147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Busse KH, Penzak SR. Pharmacological enhancement of protease inhibitors with ritonavir: an update. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2008;1:533–45. doi: 10.1586/17512433.1.4.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Sulkowski MS. Hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy containing HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Semin Liver Dis. 2003:183–94. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Bruno R, Sacchi P, Maiocchi L, Patruno S, Filice G. Hepatotoxicity and antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors: a review. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:363–73. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Duong M, Sgro C, Grappin M, Biron F, Boibieux A. Renal failure after treatment with ritonavir. Lancet. 1996;348:693. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Shafi T, Choi MJ, Racusen LC, Spacek LA, Berry C, Atta M, et al. Ritonavir-induced acute kidney injury: kidney biopsy findings and review of literature. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75(Suppl 1):60–4. doi: 10.5414/cn106469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Chen M, Suzuki A, Borlak J, Andrade RJ, Lucena MI. Drug-induced liver injury: Interactions between drug properties and host factors. Journal of hepatology. 2015;63:503–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Larson AM, Polson J, Fontana RJ, Davern TJ, Lalani E, Hynan LS, et al. Acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: results of a United States multicenter, prospective study. Hepatology. 2005;42:1364–72. doi: 10.1002/hep.20948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Hinson JA, Roberts DW, James LP. Mechanisms of acetaminophen-induced liver necrosis. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010:369–405. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00663-0_12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].McGill MR, Li F, Sharpe MR, Williams CD, Curry SC, Ma X, et al. Circulating acylcarnitines as biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction after acetaminophen overdose in mice and humans. Archives of toxicology. 2014;88:391–401. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1118-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Tostmann A, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse RE, de Lange WC, van der Ven AJ, Dekhuijzen R. Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: concise up-to-date review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:192–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Chowdhury A, Santra A, Bhattacharjee K, Ghatak S, Saha DR, Dhali GK. Mitochondrial oxidative stress and permeability transition in isoniazid and rifampicin induced liver injury in mice. J Hepatol. 2006;45:117–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Boelsterli UA, Lee KK. Mechanisms of isoniazid-induced idiosyncratic liver injury: emerging role of mitochondrial stress. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:678–87. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Wang P, Pradhan K, Zhong XB, Ma X. Isoniazid metabolism and hepatotoxicity. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2016;6:384–92. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2016.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Li F, Lu J, Cheng J, Wang L, Matsubara T, Csanaky IL, et al. Human PXR modulates hepatotoxicity associated with rifampicin and isoniazid co-therapy. Nature medicine. 2013;19:418–20. doi: 10.1038/nm.3104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Pastorino JG, Simbula G, Gilfor E, Hoek JB, Farber JL. Protoporphyrin IX, an endogenous ligand of the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, potentiates induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition and the killing of cultured hepatocytes by rotenone. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:31041–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Lyoumi S, Abitbol M, Rainteau D, Karim Z, Bernex F, Oustric V, et al. Protoporphyrin retention in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells prevents sclerosing cholangitis in erythropoietic protoporphyria mouse model. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1509–19. 19 e1–3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Sachar M, Li F, Liu K, Wang P, Lu J, Ma X. Chronic Treatment with Isoniazid Causes Protoporphyrin IX Accumulation in Mouse Liver. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Han X, Yang K, Gross RW. Multi-dimensional mass spectrometry-based shotgun lipidomics and novel strategies for lipidomic analyses. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2012;31:134–78. doi: 10.1002/mas.20342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Fromenty B, Pessayre D. Inhibition of mitochondrial beta-oxidation as a mechanism of hepatotoxicity. Pharmacol Ther. 1995;67:101–54. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(95)00012-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Jaeschke H, Gores GJ, Cederbaum AI, Hinson JA, Pessayre D, Lemasters JJ. Mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2002;65:166–76. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/65.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Cascales M, Alvarez A, Gasco P, Fernandez-Simon L, Sanz N, Bosca L. Cocaine-induced liver injury in mice elicits specific changes in DNA ploidy and induces programmed death of hepatocytes. Hepatology. 1994;20:992–1001. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840200431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Cantilena LR, Cherstniakova SA, Saviolakis G, Kahn R, Elkashef A, Rose L, et al. Prevalence of abnormal liver-associated enzymes in cocaine experienced adults versus healthy volunteers during phase 1 clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:695–704. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Shi X, Yao D, Gosnell BA, Chen C. Lipidomic profiling reveals protective function of fatty acid oxidation in cocaine-induced hepatotoxicity. J Lipid Res. 2012;53:2318–30. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M027656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Ulrich RG. Idiosyncratic toxicity: a convergence of risk factors. Annu Rev Med. 2007;58:17–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.58.072905.160823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Park BK, Kitteringham NR, Powell H, Pirmohamed M. Advances in molecular toxicology-towards understanding idiosyncratic drug toxicity. Toxicology. 2000;153:39–60. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00303-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Kalgutkar AS, Dalvie D. Predicting toxicities of reactive metabolite-positive drug candidates. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2015;55:35–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Ikeda T. Idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity: strategy for prevention and proposed mechanism. Current medicinal chemistry. 2015;22:528–37. doi: 10.2174/0929867321666140916122628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Yuan L, Kaplowitz N. Mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury. Clinics in liver disease. 2013;17:507–18. vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Bjornsson ES. Epidemiology and risk factors for idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Seminars in liver disease. 2014;34:115–22. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Heidari R, Niknahad H, Jamshidzadeh A, Abdoli N. Factors affecting drug-induced liver injury: antithyroid drugs as instances. Clinical and molecular hepatology. 2014;20:237–48. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2014.20.3.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Martin FP, Collino S, Rezzi S, Kochhar S. Metabolomic applications to decipher gut microbial metabolic influence in health and disease. Frontiers in physiology. 2012;3:113. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Aura AM, Mattila I, Hyotylainen T, Gopalacharyulu P, Bounsaythip C, Oresic M, et al. Drug metabolome of the simvastatin formed by human intestinal microbiota in vitro. Molecular bioSystems. 2011;7:437–46. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00023j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Carmody RN, Turnbaugh PJ. Host-microbial interactions in the metabolism of therapeutic and diet-derived xenobiotics. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:4173–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI72335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Li H, He J, Jia W. The influence of gut microbiota on drug metabolism and toxicity. Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology. 2016;12:31–40. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2016.1121234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Wilson ID, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiome interactions with drug metabolism, efficacy, and toxicity. Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES