Skip to main content
NCBI home page
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2017 Jul 25;8(4):e00540-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00540-17

Polymyxin Combinations Combat Escherichia coli Harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5: Preparation for a Postantibiotic Era

Zackery P Bulman a,b, Liang Chen c, Thomas J Walsh d, Michael J Satlin d, Yuli Qian e, Jürgen B Bulitta e, Charles A Peloquin f, Patricia N Holden a,b, Roger L Nation g, Jian Li g, Barry N Kreiswirth c,✉, Brian T Tsuji a,b,✉
Editor: Gerard D Wrighth
PMCID: PMC5527306  PMID: 28743810

ABSTRACT

The rapid increase of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria has resurrected the importance of the polymyxin antibiotics. The recent discovery of plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance (mcr-1) in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae serves as an important indicator that the golden era of antibiotics is under serious threat. We assessed the bacterial killing of 15 different FDA-approved antibiotics alone and in combination with polymyxin B in time-killing experiments against Escherichia coli MCR1_NJ, the first reported isolate in the United States to coharbor mcr-1 and a New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase gene (blaNDM-5). The most promising regimens were advanced to the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM), where human pharmacokinetics for polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin were simulated over 240 h. Exposure to polymyxin B monotherapy was accompanied by MCR1_NJ regrowth but not resistance amplification (polymyxin B MIC from 0 to 240 h [MIC0h to MIC240h] of 4 mg/liter), whereas amikacin monotherapy caused regrowth and simultaneous resistance amplification (amikacin MIC0h of 4 mg/liter versus MIC240h of >64 mg/liter). No MCR1_NJ colonies were observed for any of the aztreonam-containing regimens after 72 h. However, HFIM cartridges for both aztreonam monotherapy and the polymyxin B-plus-aztreonam regimen were remarkably turbid, and the presence of long, filamentous MCR1_NJ cells was evident in scanning electron microscopy, suggestive of a nonreplicating persister (NRP) phenotype. In contrast, the 3-drug combination of polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin provided complete eradication (>8-log10 CFU/ml reduction) with suppression of resistance and prevention of NRP formation. This is the first comprehensive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study to evaluate triple-drug combinations for polymyxin- and carbapenem-resistant E. coli coproducing MCR-1 and NDM-5 and will aid in the preparation for a so-called “postantibiotic” era.

KEYWORDS: Enterobacteriaceae, MCR-1, NDM-5, amikacin, aztreonam, carbapenem-resistant, polymyxins

IMPORTANCE

A global health crisis may be on the horizon, as the golden era of antibiotics is under serious threat. We recently reported the first case in the United States of a highly resistant, Escherichia coli so-called “superbug” (MCR1_NJ), coharboring two of the most worrying antibiotic resistance genes, encoding mobile colistin resistance (mcr-1) and a New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM-5). Worryingly, the medical community is vulnerable to this emerging bacterial threat because optimal treatment strategies are undefined. Here, we report the activity of an optimized combination using simulated human doses of commercially available antibiotics against MCR1_NJ. A unique triple combination involving a cocktail of polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin eradicated the MCR-1- and NDM-5-producing E. coli. Each antimicrobial agent administered as monotherapy or in double combinations failed to eradicate MCR1_NJ at a high inoculum. To our knowledge, this is the first study to propose 3-drug therapeutic solutions against superbugs coharboring mcr-1 and blaNDM, seeking to prepare clinicians for future occurrences of these pathogens.

OBSERVATION

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose an urgent threat to global human health. Among the enzymes responsible for carbapenem resistance, the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM) warrant significant attention due to their location on highly mobile genetic elements and coexistence with many other resistance determinants that have resulted in their rapid worldwide dissemination. The polymyxin antibiotics (polymyxin B and polymyxin E [colistin]) have resurged as important last-line treatment options against CRE. The World Health Organization has also reclassified the polymyxin antibiotics as being “critically important to human medicine,” highlighting the need to optimize their clinical use (1). Therefore, the recent discovery of the plasmid-mediated, mobile polymyxin resistance gene mcr-1 poses a significant threat to the clinician’s treatment armamentarium.

MCR-1-producing Escherichia coli was first discovered in 2015 in China (2) and has now been detected in the United States and worldwide (3). MCR-1 is a phosphoethanolamine transferase capable of modifying the lipid A portion of lipopolysaccharide with phosphoethanolamine, thereby inhibiting the binding of polymyxins. Even more worrisome, polymyxin- and carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates have been increasingly identified, including the first MCR-1- and NDM-5-coproducing E. coli isolate (MCR1_NJ) in the United States, which was recently reported by our group (4). MCR1_NJ was isolated from a patient in New Jersey who had a history of prostate cancer and developed recurrent urinary tract infections. The E. coli urinary isolate was found to contain both mcr-1 and blaNDM-5 genes on separate plasmids (pMCR1-NJ-IncX4 and PNDM5-NJ-IncX3, respectively), in addition to other resistance determinants for aminoglycosides, β-lactams, chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, rifampin, sulfonamides, and tetracycline. Worryingly, there are a growing number of similar Enterobacteriaceae strains with MCR-1 coexisting with NDM-1, NDM-5, and NDM-9 (5–8). Truly pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains of Enterobacteriaceae harboring blaNDM have recently been reported in the United States (9) and worldwide (10), with chromosomal mutations in mgrB accounting for polymyxin resistance in these isolates. Cumulatively, these findings have escalated the threat of a “postantibiotic” era; it may only be a matter of time before hospitals around the world face a large outbreak of MCR-1- and NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae (11, 12).

The clinical impact of infections caused by mcr-1- or blaNDM-harboring bacteria is currently unknown. However, infections by CRE with non-MCR-1, chromosomally encoded polymyxin resistance mechanisms result in unacceptably high mortality rates that may be in excess of 60% (13, 14). The medical community is unprepared to treat Gram-negative pathogens harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM due to the lack of published in vitro, animal, or clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of the limited treatment options. Therefore, it is imperative to elucidate optimized therapeutic strategies using currently available antimicrobials to therapeutically prepare for these very problematic pathogens. Here, we describe for the first time the pharmacodynamic activities of antimicrobial combinations against E. coli MCR1_NJ, the first reported isolate from the United States coharboring MCR-1 and NDM.

Results.

In the dose-ranging time-kill experiments against MCR1_NJ at an ~106-CFU/ml inoculum, the minimum amikacin concentration required to achieve undetectable bacterial counts at 24 h was 256 mg/liter. The addition of polymyxin B reduced the concentration of amikacin required to achieve no bacterial growth to 64 mg/liter (3.04-fold reduction in the fitted 50% effective concentration [EC50]). The minimum aztreonam concentration required to cause undetectable bacterial growth after 24 h was 4 mg/liter; polymyxin B reduced the aztreonam concentration requirement for undetectable growth to 1 mg/liter (3.73-fold reduction in the fitted EC50). At an ~106-CFU/ml inoculum of E. coli MCR1_NJ in the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) (Fig. 1A1 to A7), polymyxin B and amikacin monotherapies caused maximal bacterial reductions within 6 h of 1.72 and 3.34 log10 CFU/ml, respectively, followed by bacterial regrowth by 24 h. A combination of polymyxin B and amikacin prolonged the time until regrowth until 96 h and resulted in maximal bacterial killing of 6.10 log10 CFU/ml at 30 h. Population analysis profiles (PAPs) obtained throughout exposure to amikacin monotherapy or the polymyxin B-plus-amikacin combination revealed a 3.06- and a 4.05-log10 CFU/ml increase of the amikacin-resistant subpopulation (64-mg/liter amikacin-imbued agar), respectively, at 240 h compared to this subpopulation in the growth control. In contrast to the amikacin resistance, MCR1_NJ polymyxin B resistance remained stable during each HFIM experiment regardless of polymyxin exposure. Aztreonam monotherapy, polymyxin B plus aztreonam, and the triple combination resulted in bacterial reductions of >6 log10 CFU/ml and undetectable bacterial counts that were sustained through 240 h beginning after 48 h, 24 h, and 26 h, respectively. These three antibiotic regimens also suppressed polymyxin, aztreonam, and amikacin resistance.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Open in a new tab

E. coli MCR1_NJ total population bacterial counts (black lines) and antibiotic-resistant subpopulations (colored lines) quantified during the HFIM at a starting inoculum of either ~106 CFU/ml (A) or ~108 CFU/ml (B). Antibiotic-resistant subpopulations, which are fractions of the respective total population, were quantified using MHA plates imbued with the specified concentrations of polymyxin B (blue lines), aztreonam (red lines), or amikacin (green lines). Humanized regimens of polymyxin B with front loading (3.33 mg/kg for 1 dose followed by 1.43 mg/kg q12h starting 12 h later), aztreonam (2 g q8h), and amikacin (15 mg/kg q24h) were simulated over 240 h.

The antibiotic regimens caused similar bacterial killing and resistance patterns at the ~108-CFU/ml starting inoculum of E. coli MCR1_NJ (Fig. 1B1 to B7); aztreonam monotherapy, polymyxin B plus aztreonam, and the triple combination all drove total bacterial counts to be undetectable (>8-log10 CFU/ml reductions in total bacterial counts). The most notable difference at the ~108-CFU/ml starting inoculum was the marked turbidity (240-h optical density at 620 nm [OD620]) observed through 240 h in the aztreonam monotherapy (OD620 of 0.108) and polymyxin B-plus-aztreonam (OD620 of 0.083) HFIM cartridges, despite no observed bacterial growth, compared to the clear cultures observed only for the triple combination. Visualization of MCR1_NJ from the HFIM before and after exposure to aztreonam monotherapy or polymyxin B plus aztreonam using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed an elongation of the bacterial cells from the baseline (Fig. 2). The long, filamentous E. coli cells from the HFIM that was exposed to aztreonam were each ~2 times wider and up to at least 6 times longer than unexposed bacterial cells. Exposure to polymyxin B plus aztreonam also induced outer membrane damage to the MCR1_NJ cells, as demonstrated by protrusions across the entire cell surface.

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Open in a new tab

Scanning electron microscopy images of representative E. coli MCR1_NJ cells at a magnification of ×10,000. Images were obtained from HFIM samples at ~108-CFU/ml inoculum taken prior to antibiotic exposure (A), after 24-h exposure to aztreonam (B), after 240-h exposure to aztreonam (C), after 24-h exposure to polymyxin B plus aztreonam (D), and after 240-h exposure to polymyxin B plus aztreonam (E). Bacterial samples were prepared and imaged on 0.2-μm filter paper, which is seen behind the cells for reference.

Treatment with amikacin or polymyxin B plus amikacin against ~108 CFU/ml of MCR1_NJ caused maximal bacterial reductions after 4 h of 2.43 and 3.10 log10 CFU/ml, respectively, before regrowth occurred. For the 3 regimens that resulted in bacterial regrowth at the ~108-CFU/ml inoculum, the polymyxin B PAPs remained relatively unchanged throughout 240 h; there was no appreciable proliferation of polymyxin-resistant subpopulations (polymyxin B MIC at 0 h [MIC0h] of 4 mg/liter and MIC240h of 4 mg/liter). The bacterial regrowth after treatment with amikacin or polymyxin B plus amikacin was accompanied by increases of 2.99 log10 CFU/ml (amikacin MIC0h of 4 mg/liter and MIC240h of >64 mg/liter) and 2.17 log10 CFU/ml (amikacin MIC0h of 4 mg/liter and MIC240h of 32 mg/liter), respectively, in the amikacin-resistant subpopulation (64-mg/liter amikacin-imbued agar) compared to this population in the growth control. There were no aztreonam-resistant subpopulations detected after 240 h in the HFIM for any antibiotic regimen at either starting inoculum.

E. coli MCR1_NJ’s growth at the ~108-CFU/ml inoculum when exposed to polymyxin B monotherapy closely mirrored that of the growth control. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) after exposure to the polymyxin B front-load regimen for 24 and 240 h revealed 6 and 8 homozygous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively, (no homozygous indels) compared to the sequence of unexposed MCR1_NJ. However, none of the SNPs were detected in genes previously associated with polymyxin resistance. Further examination confirmed that there were no heterozygous variants in any of the previously identified polymyxin resistance genes. These WGS results are consistent with the stable MCR1_NJ phenotypic response to polymyxin B treatment in the HFIM (polymyxin B MIC of 4 mg/liter from 0 to 240 h). Thus, in the mcr-1-harboring MCR1_NJ isolate, polymyxin exposure did not potentiate polymyxin resistance through the acquisition of a new mutation.

Discussion.

Infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae that harbor mcr-1 and blaNDM-5 represent an urgent global health threat, currently lacking evidence-based therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, there are no novel antibacterial agents in the current drug development pipeline active against MCR-1- and NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae (15). This highlights the critical need to optimize our existing antibiotics for the future occurrence of these pathogens in the clinical setting. In the present study, we determined that a triple combination of polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin was able to eradicate E. coli MCR1_NJ, the first reported isolate in the United States to produce MCR-1 and NDM, at both low and high bacterial densities in an in vitro HFIM. This finding supports the idea that polymyxin B may still be an integral component of treatment in combination with other antimicrobials for mcr-1-harboring organisms whose polymyxin MICs are typically around the susceptibility cutoff. Against MCR1_NJ, a polymyxin B front-loaded regimen alone resulted in regrowth at high and low initial inocula. However, despite extensive selection pressure by polymyxin B, MCR1_NJ did not acquire a chromosomal polymyxin resistance mutation, and the polymyxin B MIC remained remarkably stable at 4 mg/liter through 10 days. The stability of polymyxin resistance additionally suggests that the administration of polymyxin antibiotics to mcr-1-harboring organisms is unlikely to have a collateral impact to potentiate high levels of polymyxin resistance such as have been described for polymyxin-induced chromosomal mutations in mgrB or pmrAB (16, 17). The effect of polymyxin monotherapy on polymyxin-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae, where high levels of resistance almost always emerge, is in stark contrast to the stable, low-level polymyxin resistance observed in mcr-1-harboring organisms (18). This may also support the use of short-duration polymyxin B regimens that can generate concentrations above the MIC.

Amikacin monotherapy or a combination of polymyxin B and amikacin resulted in rapid proliferation of MCR1_NJ amikacin-resistant subpopulations and corresponding increases in the amikacin MICs. Although AAC(6′)-Ib has been reported to confer amikacin and tobramycin resistance (19), E. coli MCR1_NJ was initially susceptible to amikacin despite harboring the aac(6′)-Ib-cr resistance gene. A majority of NDM-producing organisms are resistant to each of the aminoglycosides; however, previous surveillance studies have shown that amikacin may retain its bactericidal activity more frequently than gentamicin or tobramycin (20, 21). Further investigation is required to determine the precise mechanism of amikacin resistance proliferation and to determine its clinical relevance. The regrowth of E. coli MCR1_NJ upon exposure to amikacin represents a potentially significant clinical limitation to aminoglycoside utilization in the absence of genomic screening and further supports the significant promise of the triple-antimicrobial combination reported here.

Unexpectedly, aztreonam monotherapy or a combination of polymyxin B and aztreonam at a high initial inoculum of E. coli MCR1_NJ caused undetectable bacterial counts despite visible turbidity in the HFIM cartridges for 240 h. Thus, we used scanning electron microscopy to visualize cells following exposure to these two aztreonam-containing regimens and observed long, filamentous cells. The turbidity of the samples from the HFIM cartridge, with an absence of bacterial growth on agar plates and the visualized filamentous cells, demonstrates the remarkable capacity for MCR1_NJ to persist in the face of prolonged, intensive antibiotic exposure and is ultimately suggestive of a long, filamentous, nonreplicating persister (NRP) phenotype (Fig. 2) (22). The E. coli MCR1_NJ NRPs, caused by aztreonam monotherapy or a combination of polymyxin B and aztreonam, could not be grown or quantified by typical colony-counting techniques on antibiotic-free media (Mueller-Hinton agar or broth, grown for up to 7 days), likely due to their inability to divide. Importantly, these filamentous MCR1_NJ populations were not accompanied by aztreonam resistance, as aztreonam-resistant colonies were not detected in PAPs. Gladys Hobby et al. (23) and Joseph Bigger (24) first described the bacterial-persister phenomenon in the 1940s in reference to subpopulations of bacteria that were remarkably tolerant to antibiotics following exposure to penicillin. Subsequent studies regarding NRPs have revealed that despite retaining antibiotic susceptibility, they enter into an antibiotic-tolerant, slowly growing or nonreplicating state that can later be reverted to the original phenotype under specific conditions (25). The elongated and filamentous E. coli cells that were observed following aztreonam exposure are likely a product of penicillin binding protein 3 (PBP3) inhibition, which has been shown to inhibit cell division by prevention of cellular septation, subsequently leading to filamentation (22). Thus, bactericidal doses of aztreonam against a high density of MCR1_NJ likely killed the susceptible fraction of the total population, leaving behind an aztreonam-tolerant subpopulation of E. coli that subsequently elongated due to PBP3 inhibition. Interestingly, persister levels have been shown to increase sharply during late exponential growth, reaching ~1% of the population by stationary phase, which may help to explain the detection of the NRP phenotype following aztreonam exposure only at the higher bacterial density (26).

Although the clinical implications of nonreplicating, persistent filamentous cells are yet to be completely defined, since these bacteria often remain metabolically active and are capable of awakening from their tolerant phase following the removal of antibiotic pressure, they may be responsible for some recurrent or relapsing infections (27). These findings highlight potential limitations to certain aztreonam-based regimens against infections involving high bacterial densities of mcr-1- and blaNDM-5-coharboring E. coli strains that have been defined as aztreonam susceptible only by traditional MIC-testing techniques. However, aztreonam monotherapy may still be an important treatment strategy to combat low-bacterial-density infections caused by these pathogens, since no NRPs were observed at the low inoculum in the HFIM. Further studies are required to analyze the triple combination of polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin against E. coli isolates that are aztreonam resistant, such as through the presence of blaCTX-M, while still coharboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5.

In summary, we have characterized for the first time the pharmacodynamics of a triple combination against Enterobacteriaceae coharboring mobile polymyxin and carbapenem resistance genes. The combination of polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin may, through suppression of resistance and prevention of long, filamentous NRP formation, be an effective treatment option to combat infections caused by bacteria that harbor both mcr-1 and blaNDM-5. The absence of a chromosomal mutation conferring additional polymyxin resistance in MCR1_NJ despite polymyxin B exposure could additionally support the use of this polymyxin-based combination strategy to treat infections with mcr-1-harboring organisms in an era of few treatment options. Additional studies should be conducted using animal models to fully elucidate the efficacy of this triple combination and the clinical relevance of NRPs prior to clinical evaluation and implementation.

Methods.

E. coli isolate MCR1_NJ grown on Mueller-Hinton II agar (MHA) containing 2 mg/liter polymyxin B (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was utilized for all experiments (4). The MICs for MCR1_NJ were obtained for all antimicrobials utilized in this experiment via broth microdilution in duplicate according to CLSI guidelines (Table 1) (28). Time-kill studies were conducted as previously described (29) at an inoculum of ~106 CFU/ml to uncover the antimicrobial regimens with the greatest pharmacodynamic activity as defined by eradication at 24 h. The following antimicrobials that are commercially available in the United States for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria were tested alone or in combination with polymyxin B: amikacin (37.5 mg/liter), ampicillin-sulbactam (100/50 mg/liter), aztreonam (75 mg/liter), cefoxitin (65 mg/liter), ceftazidime (80 mg/liter), ceftazidime-avibactam (80/15 mg/liter), ceftolozane-tazobactam (55/15 mg/liter), chloramphenicol (32 mg/liter), ciprofloxacin (5 mg/liter), meropenem (50 mg/liter), nitrofurantoin (40 mg/liter), piperacillin-tazobactam (75/15 mg/liter), polymyxin B (6 mg/liter), rifampin (3.5 mg/liter), tigecycline (2 mg/liter), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (30/4 mg/liter). Antimicrobials that eradicated MCR1_NJ at 24 h in the time-kill experiments were selected for validation in the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). The two combinations that resulted in undetectable bacterial counts at 24 h were polymyxin B plus aztreonam and polymyxin B plus amikacin. To intensely investigate the concentration-response effect for these antibiotics alone and in the presence of polymyxin B, dose-ranging time-kill experiments were conducted at an inoculum of ~106 CFU/ml of MCR1_NJ with polymyxin B (2.41 mg/liter) combined with either aztreonam (0.016, 0.063, 0.25, 1.0, 4.0, 16, 64, and 256 mg/liter) or amikacin (0.016, 0.063, 0.25, 1.0, 4.0, 16, 64, and 256 mg/liter).

TABLE 1 .

E. coli MCR1_NJ susceptibilities determined by broth microdilution for all antimicrobials utilized in the time-kill experiments and hollow-fiber infection model

Antimicrobial agent MIC (μg/ml)
Amikacin 4
Ampicillin-sulbactam >128/64
Aztreonam ≤0.25
Cefoxitin >64
Ceftazidime >64
Ceftazidime-avibactam >16/4
Ceftolozane-tazobactam >256/4
Chloramphenicol >64
Ciprofloxacin >64
Meropenem >64
Nitrofurantoin 16
Piperacillin-tazobactam 128/4
Polymyxin B 4
Rifampin >64
Tigecycline 0.50
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 2/38
Open in a new tab

The HFIM studies were conducted over 10 days using cellulosic cartridges (cartridge C3008; FiberCell Systems, Inc., Frederick, MD) with 18 ml of either ~106 or ~108 CFU/ml of E. coli MCR1_NJ, as described previously (30). Polymyxin B (half-life [t1/2] = 8 h), aztreonam (t1/2 = 2 h), and amikacin (t1/2 = 2 h) regimens were simulated alone or in double or triple combinations in the HFIM based on human pharmacokinetic data as follows (31–33): (i) polymyxin B front load of 3.33 mg/kg for 1 dose followed by 1.43 mg/kg every 12 h (q12h) starting 12 h later, with a maximum concentration of free, unbound drug (fCmax) of 3.61 mg/liter and an area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h for the free, unbound fraction of drug (fAUC0−24) of 48.2 mg ⋅ h/liter during the first day and an fCmax of 2.41 mg/liter and fAUC24 of 35.9 mg ⋅ h/liter at steady state; (ii) aztreonam at 2 g q8h with an fCmax of 95.3 mg/liter and fAUC0−24 of 807.9 mg ⋅ h/liter during the first day and an fCmax of 95.3 mg/liter and fAUC24 of 827.2 mg ⋅ h/liter at steady state; and (iii) amikacin at 15 mg/kg q24h with an fCmax of 50.1 mg/liter and fAUC24 of 153.6 mg ⋅ h/liter throughout every day.

The MCR1_NJ baseline MICs for polymyxin B, aztreonam, and amikacin were 4, ≤0.25, and 4 mg/liter, respectively (Table 1). For combination regimens, polymyxin B was supplemented into the central reservoir of the HFIM every 1.2 h to maintain a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with a t1/2 of 8 h (34). Total bacterial counts and population analysis profiles (PAPs) were performed during the HFIM by plating 50-μl aliquots of bacterial samples onto MHA plates without drug for total counts or onto plates containing polymyxin B (2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 mg/liter), aztreonam (0.25, 2, and 16 mg/liter), or amikacin (4, 16, or 64 mg/liter) for PAPs. The antibiotic concentrations in the HFIM were validated using samples that were obtained over a 48-h period. Polymyxin B concentrations were determined by a liquid chromatography (LC) single-quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) method described previously (35). Amikacin concentrations were validated using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method (Dionex ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography [UHPLC] and triple-stage quadrupole [TSQ] Endura instruments; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The amikacin calibration curve from 1 to 75 mg/liter was linear, with an overall assay precision ranging from 1.7 to 4.9%. Aztreonam concentrations were analyzed using an LC-MS/MS method (Agilent series 6460 triple-quadrupole LC-MS/MS coupled with Agilent series 1260 LC; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The compound was extracted by protein precipitation using acetonitrile containing amdinocillin as an internal standard. A gradient method was employed, with the mobile phase consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. The calibration curve was linear over a range of 1 to 100 mg/liter (R2 = 0.997). There was satisfactory agreement between the observed and targeted pharmacokinetic profiles for polymyxin B (R2 = 0.93, slope = 0.69, and intercept = −0.02), amikacin (R2 = 0.99, slope = 0.87, and intercept = 1.90), and aztreonam (R2 = 0.98, slope = 0.86, and intercept = 9.05).

Whole-genome DNA sequencing (WGS) and analyses were performed as previously described (36) to assess the influence of polymyxin B exposure on the E. coli MCR1_NJ genotype. The sequences of E. coli MCR1_NJ prior to antibiotic exposure (0 h), the E. coli MCR1_NJ unexposed growth control (240 h), and E. coli MCR1_NJ after polymyxin B exposure (24 h and 240 h) were compared. Samples for sequencing were obtained from the HFIM at the respective time points, and genomic DNA was extracted using a Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The Nextera DNA library preparation kit was used for genome library preparation, and the library was then sequenced using the Illumina NextSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Quality-trimmed reads of mutants were aligned to the reference genome (MCR1_NJ, accession number MAJK00000000) using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (37). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion-deletion sites (indels) were called using SAMtools (38) and VarScan (39), followed by annotation using snpEff (40). The default setting of >75% for variant allele frequency was used to call homozygous variants (SNPs and indels), and allele frequencies of between 10 and 75% were used to detect heterozygous variants.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a field emission scanning electron microscope with an Oxford energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (Hitachi SU70; Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc., Schaumburg, IL) was utilized to visualize E. coli MCR1_NJ. Images were obtained from HFIM samples prior to antibiotic exposure (0 h) and from 2 experimental samples (24 h and 240 h) where turbidity in the cellulosic HFIM cartridges was observed without cell growth on MHA plates (aztreonam monotherapy and polymyxin B plus aztreonam against the ~108-CFU/ml E. coli MCR1_NJ starting inoculum).

Accession number(s).

The sequence reads of this study have been deposited under BioProject accession number PRJNA353361 with accession numbers SRX2772346 to SRX2772348.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01AI111990 and R01AI090155.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Citation Bulman ZP, Chen L, Walsh TJ, Satlin MJ, Qian Y, Bulitta JB, Peloquin CA, Holden PN, Nation RL, Li J, Kreiswirth BN, Tsuji BT. 2017. Polymyxin combinations combat Escherichia coli harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5: preparation for a postantibiotic era. mBio 8:e00540-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00540-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Collignon PC, Conly JM, Andremont A, McEwen SA, Aidara-Kane A, World Health Organization Advisory Group, Bogotá Meeting on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (WHO-AGISAR), Agerso Y, Andremont A, Collignon P, Conly J, Dang Ninh T, Donado-Godoy P, Fedorka-Cray P, Fernandez H, Galas M, Irwin R, Karp B, Matar G, McDermott P, McEwen S, Mitema E, Reid-Smith R, Scott HM, Singh R, DeWaal CS, Stelling J, Toleman M, Watanabe H, Woo GJ. 2016. World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: a critical step for developing risk management strategies to control antimicrobial resistance from food animal production. Clin Infect Dis 63:1087–1093. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, Doi Y, Tian G, Dong B, Huang X, Yu LF, Gu D, Ren H, Chen X, Lv L, He D, Zhou H, Liang Z, Liu JH, Shen J. 2015. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis 16:161–168. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schwarz S, Johnson AP. 2016. Transferable resistance to colistin: a new but old threat. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2066–2070. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mediavilla JR, Patrawalla A, Chen L, Chavda KD, Mathema B, Vinnard C, Dever LL, Kreiswirth BN. 2016. Colistin- and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli harboring mcr-1 and blaNDM-5, causing a complicated urinary tract infection in a patient from the United States. mBio 7:e01191-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01191-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Delgado-Blas JF, Ovejero CM, Abadia-Patiño L, Gonzalez-Zorn B. 2016. Coexistence of mcr-1 and blaNDM-1 in Escherichia coli from Venezuela. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6356–6358. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01319-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yu H, Qu F, Shan B, Huang B, Jia W, Chen C, Li A, Miao M, Zhang X, Bao C, Xu Y, Chavda KD, Tang YW, Kreiswirth BN, Du H, Chen L. 2016. Detection of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from different hospitals in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5033–5035. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00440-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Du H, Chen L, Tang YW, Kreiswirth BN. 2016. Emergence of the mcr-1 colistin resistance gene in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Lancet Infect Dis 16:287–288. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00056-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yao X, Doi Y, Zeng L, Lv L, Liu JH. 2016. Carbapenem-resistant and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli co-producing NDM-9 and MCR-1. Lancet Infect Dis 16:288–289. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen L, Todd R, Kiehlbauch J, Walters M, Kallen A. 2017. Notes from the field: pan-resistant New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae—Washoe County, Nevada, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66:33. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6601a7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zowawi HM, Forde BM, Alfaresi M, Alzarouni A, Farahat Y, Chong TM, Yin WF, Chan KG, Li J, Schembri MA, Beatson SA, Paterson DL. 2015. Stepwise evolution of pandrug-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci Rep 5:15082. doi: 10.1038/srep15082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AK, Wertheim HF, Sumpradit N, Vlieghe E, Hara GL, Gould IM, Goossens H, Greko C, So AD, Bigdeli M, Tomson G, Woodhouse W, Ombaka E, Peralta AQ, Qamar FN, Mir F, Kariuki S, Bhutta ZA, Coates A, Bergstrom R, Wright GD, Brown ED, Cars O. 2013. Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect Dis 13:1057–1098. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bonomo RA. 2011. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase and multidrug resistance: a global SOS? Clin Infect Dis 52:485–487. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zarkotou O, Pournaras S, Voulgari E, Chrysos G, Prekates A, Voutsinas D, Themeli-Digalaki K, Tsakris A. 2010. Risk factors and outcomes associated with acquisition of colistin-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a matched case-control study. J Clin Microbiol 48:2271–2274. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02301-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kontopidou F, Plachouras D, Papadomichelakis E, Koukos G, Galani I, Poulakou G, Dimopoulos G, Antoniadou A, Armaganidis A, Giamarellou H. 2011. Colonization and infection by colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a cohort of critically ill patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:E9–E11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Benjamin DK Jr, Bradley J, Guidos RJ, Jones RN, Murray BE, Bonomo RA, Gilbert D, Infectious Diseases Society of America . 2013. 10 × '20 progress—development of new drugs active against gram-negative bacilli: an update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:1685–1694. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cannatelli A, D’Andrea MM, Giani T, Di Pilato V, Arena F, Ambretti S, Gaibani P, Rossolini GM. 2013. In vivo emergence of colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae producing KPC-type carbapenemases mediated by insertional inactivation of the PhoQ/PhoP mgrB regulator. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5521–5526. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01480-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Olaitan AO, Diene SM, Kempf M, Berrazeg M, Bakour S, Gupta SK, Thongmalayvong B, Akkhavong K, Somphavong S, Paboriboune P, Chaisiri K, Komalamisra C, Adelowo OO, Fagade OE, Banjo OA, Oke AJ, Adler A, Assous MV, Morand S, Raoult D, Rolain JM. 2014. Worldwide emergence of colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae from healthy humans and patients in Lao PDR, Thailand, Israel, Nigeria and France owing to inactivation of the PhoP/PhoQ regulator mgrB: an epidemiological and molecular study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 44:500–507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith NM, Bulman ZP, Sieron AO, Bulitta JB, Holden PN, Nation RL, Li J, Wright GD, Tsuji BT 15 May 2017. Pharmacodynamics of dose-escalated “front-loading” polymyxin B regimens against polymyxin-resistant mcr-1-harbouring Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Neonakis I, Gikas A, Scoulica E, Manios A, Georgiladakis A, Tselentis Y. 2003. Evolution of aminoglycoside resistance phenotypes of four Gram-negative bacteria: an 8-year survey in a University Hospital in Greece. Int J Antimicrob Agents 22:526–531. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Seema K, Ranjan Sen M, Upadhyay S, Bhattacharjee A. 2011. Dissemination of the New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) among Enterobacteriaceae in a tertiary referral hospital in north India. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1646–1647. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kumarasamy KK, Toleman MA, Walsh TR, Bagaria J, Butt F, Balakrishnan R, Chaudhary U, Doumith M, Giske CG, Irfan S, Krishnan P, Kumar AV, Maharjan S, Mushtaq S, Noorie T, Paterson DL, Pearson A, Perry C, Pike R, Rao B, Ray U, Sarma JB, Sharma M, Sheridan E, Thirunarayan MA, Turton J, Upadhyay S, Warner M, Welfare W, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2010. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 10:597–602. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70143-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fung-Tomc JC, Lincourt W, Thater C, Kessler RE. 1988. Comparison of the inhibitory and bactericidal activity of aztreonam and amikacin against gram negative aerobic bacilli. Ann Clin Lab Sci 18:463–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hobby GL, Meyer K, Chaffee E. 1942. Observations on the mechanism of action of penicillin. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 50:281–285. doi: 10.3181/00379727-50-13773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bigger J. 1944. Treatment of staphylococcal infections with penicillin by intermittent sterilisation. Lancet 244:497–500. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)74210-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jõers A, Kaldalu N, Tenson T. 2010. The frequency of persisters in Escherichia coli reflects the kinetics of awakening from dormancy. J Bacteriol 192:3379–3384. doi: 10.1128/JB.00056-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Keren I, Kaldalu N, Spoering A, Wang Y, Lewis K. 2004. Persister cells and tolerance to antimicrobials. FEMS Microbiol Lett 230:13–18. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00856-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fauvart M, De Groote VN, Michiels J. 2011. Role of persister cells in chronic infections: clinical relevance and perspectives on anti-persister therapies. J Med Microbiol 60:699–709. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.030932-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.CLSI 2015. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 10th ed. CLSI Document M07-A10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ly NS, Bulman ZP, Bulitta JB, Baron C, Rao GG, Holden PN, Li J, Sutton MD, Tsuji BT. 2016. Optimization of polymyxin B in combination with doripenem to combat mutator Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2870–2880. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02377-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tsuji BT, Landersdorfer CB, Lenhard JR, Cheah SE, Thamlikitkul V, Rao GG, Holden PN, Forrest A, Bulitta JB, Nation RL, Li J. 2016. Paradoxical effect of polymyxin B: high drug exposure amplifies resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3913–3920. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02831-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sandri AM, Landersdorfer CB, Jacob J, Boniatti MM, Dalarosa MG, Falci DR, Behle TF, Bordinhão RC, Wang J, Forrest A, Nation RL, Li J, Zavascki AP. 2013. Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous polymyxin B in critically ill patients: implications for selection of dosage regimens. Clin Infect Dis 57:524–531. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 2013. Azactam (aztreonam injection) package insert. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garraffo R, Drugeon HB, Dellamonica P, Bernard E, Lapalus P. 1990. Determination of optimal dosage regimen for amikacin in healthy volunteers by study of pharmacokinetics and bactericidal activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34:614–621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.4.614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Blaser J. 1985. In-vitro model for simultaneous simulation of the serum kinetics of two drugs with different half-lives. J Antimicrob Chemother 15(Suppl A):125–130. doi: 10.1093/jac/15.suppl_A.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cheah SE, Bulitta JB, Li J, Nation RL. 2014. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay for polymyxin B in bacterial growth media. J Pharm Biomed Anal 92:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shields RK, Chen L, Cheng S, Chavda KD, Press EG, Snyder A, Pandey R, Doi Y, Kreiswirth BN, Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ. 2017. Emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance due to plasmid-borne blaKPC-3 mutations during treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02097-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02097-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hutter S, Vilella AJ, Rozas J. 2006. Genome-wide DNA polymorphism analyses using VariScan. BMC Bioinformatics 7:409. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES