Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1990 Dec;87(24):9888–9892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9888

Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: implications for the origin of maize.

J Doebley 1, A Stec 1, J Wendel 1, M Edwards 1
PMCID: PMC55279  PMID: 11607138

Abstract

Genes controlling the dramatic morphological differences between maize and its presumed progenitor (teosinte) were investigated in a maize-teosinte F2 population through the use of molecular markers. Results indicate that the key traits differentiating maize and teosinte are each under multigenic control, although for some traits, such as the number of ranks of cupules, the data are consistent with a mode of inheritance that would involve a single major locus plus several modifiers. For other traits, such as the presence/absence of the pedicellate spikelet, the data indicate multigenic inheritance with no single locus having a dramatically larger effect than the others. Results also indicate that the tunicate locus (Tu) had no major role in the origin of maize, despite previous opinion that it was involved. The major loci affecting the morphological differences between maize and teosinte are located on the first four chromosomes. The data suggest that the differences between teosinte and maize involve, in part, developmental modifications that enable (i) primary lateral inflorescences, which are programmed to develop into tassels (male) in teosinte, to become ears (female) in maize, and (ii) the expression of male secondary sex traits on a female background in maize. Similar changes were likely involved in the origin of maize.

Full text

PDF
9888

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burr B., Burr F. A., Thompson K. H., Albertson M. C., Stuber C. W. Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):519–526. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards M. D., Stuber C. W., Wendel J. F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):113–125. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Galinat W. C. Preserve Guatemalan Teosinte, a Relict Link in Corn's Evolution. Science. 1973 Apr 20;180(4083):323–323. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4083.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iltis H. H. From teosinte to maize: the catastrophic sexual transmutation. Science. 1983 Nov 25;222(4626):886–894. doi: 10.1126/science.222.4626.886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lander E. S., Green P., Abrahamson J., Barlow A., Daly M. J., Lincoln S. E., Newberg L. A., Newburg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics. 1987 Oct;1(2):174–181. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Langham D G. The Inheritance of Intergeneric Differences in Zea-Euchlaena Hybrids. Genetics. 1940 Jan;25(1):88–107. doi: 10.1093/genetics/25.1.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ROGERS J. S. The inheritance of inflorescence characters in maize-teosinte hybrids. Genetics. 1950 Sep;35(5-1):541–558. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Suiter K. A., Wendel J. F., Case J. S. LINKAGE-1: a PASCAL computer program for the detection and analysis of genetic linkage. J Hered. 1983 May-Jun;74(3):203–204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES