Abstract
Objective
To investigate the status of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in nurses working in the hospitals in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
Methods
The prevalence of WMSDs since working and in the previous 12 months was evaluated using self-administrated modified musculoskeletal questionnaire based on North European questionnaire. In this cross-sectional study, 6674 nurses involved in the nursing profession were selected from 16 hospitals using the stratified cluster sampling method.
Results
The most commonly affected regions by WMSDs were lower back, neck, shoulder, and back, with an annual prevalence of 62.71%, 59.77%, 49.66%, and 39.50%, respectively. Statistical differences were noticed in the annual prevalence of WMSDs in those with different ages (P < 0.01) and working durations (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis indicated that the following risk factors were associated with the prevalence of WMSDs: working duration of ≥6 years; working in the Emergency Department, Department of Anesthesia, or Supply Room; night shift of more than once, working duration of >40 hrs per week; poor health status; and feeling of fatigue. Rest time of >10 min and no history of WMSDs were the protective factors of WMSDs.
Conclusions
Shift and working/rest duration was closely related to WMSDs.
1. Introduction
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), one of the major factors for the early exit from the labor market, are usually related to increasing compensation and health costs, reduced productivity, and lower quality of life [1, 2]. The major features of WMSDs included pain, discomfort, and movement limitation mainly presenting in the lower back, shoulder, neck, forearm, and hands [3]. To date, the most commonly reported symptoms were nonspecific low back pain (LBP), neck-shoulder and wrist-hand syndrome, and carpal tunnel syndrome [4].
WMSDs have been listed as occupational disorders by International Labor Organization (ILO) since 1960. In the Western countries, WMSDs rank as the second occupational disorder secondary only to the dermatergosis [5]. According to a survey, the annual prevalence of WMSDs is up to 50% in the nurses with a life-long prevalence of 35–80%, which is considered as the major cause for the decrease of working efficiency [6, 7].
In the nursing professionals, WMSDs have been considered as the leading factor for the absenteeism among the nursing professionals [8]. WMSDs have been reported to obviously affect the quality of life in nurses. According to the survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), WMSDs are the most common disorder in the nursing professionals. In a recent study, more than half of the nurses (54%) showed WMSDs in the lower back, followed by neck (41%), shoulder (34%), and hand-wrist (26%) [9]. Meanwhile, half of the nursing populations showed poor sleeping and working disability induced by WMSDs [10]. In studies performed in the Indian population and Portuguese population, similar results were obtained featured by a higher prevalence of WMSDs in the nursing professionals [11, 12]. In general, WMSDs hamper the working efficiency of nurses, which then affect the safety of the patients in clinical practice. Considering the importance of epidemiological knowledge related to WMSDs among the nursing professionals, it is necessary to summarize the symptoms in a broader context. To our best of knowledge, extremely rare studies have been focused on the identification of risk factors in the nurses in the WMSDs in China mainland. In this study, we aim to investigate the main symptoms presented by nurse technicians and licensed practical nurses in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
In this cross-sectional study, 6674 nurses involved in the nursing profession were selected from the hospitals in 16 Xinjiang Autonomous regions using the stratified cluster sampling method. The inclusion criteria were as follows: the licensed practical nurses with a working experience of more than 12 months in the permanent position. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) those with MSD caused by congenital spine disorders, cancer, trauma, and gynecological disease; (ii) those with pain due to surgery, tumor vessel lesions, irregular menstruation cycle, scoliosis, disc protrusion, spine malformation, and ankylosing spondylitis; (iii) those with a long-term administration of analgesics; and (iv) those with a history of psychiatric disorder. Informed consent was obtained from each subject. The study protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University.
All the participants were required to fill in the modified self-administrated musculoskeletal questionnaire in person [13].
2.2. Measures
The following information was covered by the questionnaire: (i) demographics, such as working/resting duration, shift (day or night), and frequency of night shift; (ii) work-related factors, including gender, age, race, body mass index, academic degree, and working department; and (iii) health related factors such as physical activity and/or history of sick leave. The following regions of the body were included in the survey in the questionnaire: back, shoulder, neck, elbow, lower back, hand/wrist, hip, knee, and ankle/foot. WMSD was diagnosed based on the previous description [14]. The Chinese version of musculoskeletal questionnaire was used to identify the symptoms in any part in the previous 12 months [13].
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The entry of the information collected from the questionnaire was entered into the EpiData. SPSS 21.0 software was used for the data analysis. The qualitative data were descriptively analyzed by calculating the percentage or frequencies, and quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for WMSDs and the assignment of the risk factors was listed in Table 1. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Table 1.
Assignment of risk factors for WMSD of the nurses.
| Factor | Score |
|---|---|
| Sex | 0 = M; 1 = F |
| Age (yr) | 0 = ≤25 yrs; 1 = 26–30 yrs; 2 = 31–35 yrs; 3 = 36–40 yrs; 4 = ≥41 yrs |
| Working duration (yr) | 0 = ≤5 yrs; 1 = 6–10 yrs; 2 = 11–15 yrs; 3 = 16–20 yrs; 4 = ≥21 yrs |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0 = <18.5; 1 = 18.5~23.9; 2 = 24.0~27.9; 3 = ≥28.0 |
| Department | |
| Department of Internal Medicine | |
| Department of Surgery | |
| Department of Emergency | |
| Department of Anesthesia | |
| Supply room | |
| Race | 1 = Han Chinese; 2 = Minorities |
| Frequency of rest during working | Based on the exact working duration in the nursing care |
| Accumulated rest time | 0 < 10 min; 1 = 10~30 min; 2 = >30 min |
| Shift | 0 = No; 1 = Yes |
| Night shift | 0 = None; 1 = 1–5; 2 = 6–9; 3 = ≥10 |
| Previous history | 0 = None; 1 = Yes |
| Working time per week | Based on the exact working time in the nursing care |
| Healthy conditions | 0 = Satisfactory; 1 = general; 2 = poor; 3 = very poor |
| Feeling tired | 0 = Not at all; 1 = a little; 2 = tired; 3 = very tired |
The italic font served as control.
3. Results
3.1. Subject Characteristics
In total, 6674 active nurses (6674/6899, 95.51%; male: 214; female: 6460; aged: 16–54 yrs, mean age: 31.83 ± 7.18) accomplished the questionnaire. The working time in the institution ranged from 1 to 35 yrs (mean: 10.35 ± 7.84 yrs). The BMI was 14.52–53.99 kg/m2 (21.81 ± 3.03 kg/m2). Among these participants, 4426 (66.32%) were Han Chinese, while the others were minorities. For the academic degree, 1933 (28.96%) were with at least bachelor degree. For the health conditions, the numbers of participants with satisfactory, moderate, poor, or extremely poor physical activities were 1032 (15.46%), 4223 (63.28%), 1177 (17.46%), and 242 (3.63%), respectively. The working time per week was 30–65 hrs (mean: 46.87 ± 4.42 hrs) per week.
3.2. Prevalence of WMSDs and Sick Leave
The prevalence of WMSDs since working and in the previous 12 months was 81.18% and 77.43%, and the prevalence of sick leave was 10.50% and 9.39%, respectively. The prevalence of two or more body regions with WMSDs was 72.83% and 68.03%. The most commonly affected regions were lower back, neck, shoulder, and back, with an annual prevalence of 62.71%, 59.77%, 49.66%, and 39.50%, respectively. The sick leave due to WMSDs ever since the occupation was mainly associated with symptoms in back (6.17%), neck (3.06%), ankle (2.10%), and knee (1.68%). The prevalence of sick leave within the 12 months was 5.50% (wrist), 2.38% (neck), 1.56% (ankle), and 1.18% (shoulder), respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.
Prevalence of WMSDs and sick leave of the nurses in hospitals in Xinjiang Autonomous Region.
| Position | Working occupation-now | In the recent 1 year | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients (%) |
Number of patients asking for sick leave (%) |
Number of patients (%) |
Number of patients asking for sick leave (%) |
|
| Neck | 4274 (64.04) | 204 (3.06) | 3989 (59.77) | 159 (2.38) |
| Shoulder | 3627 (54.35) | 106 (1.59) | 3314 (49.66) | 79 (1.18) |
| Back | 2940 (44.05) | 77 (1.15) | 2636 (39.50) | 78 (1.17) |
| Elbow | 1035 (15.51) | 36 (0.54) | 967 (14.49) | 32 (0.48) |
| Lower back | 4509 (67.56) | 412 (6.17) | 4185 (62.71) | 367 (5.50) |
| Wrist | 1650 (24.72) | 60 (0.90) | 1448 (21.70) | 52 (0.78) |
| Hip | 1517 (22.73) | 68 (1.20) | 1362 (20.41) | 62 (0.93) |
| Knee | 2477 (37.11) | 112 (1.68) | 2226 (33.35) | 87 (1.30) |
| Ankle | 2267 (33.97) | 140 (2.10) | 1993 (29.86) | 104 (1.56) |
| WMSDs involving one body part | 5418 (81.18) | 701 (10.50) | 5168 (77.43) | 627 (9.39) |
| WMSDs involving at least two body parts | 4861 (72.83) | 242 (3.63) | 4540 (68.03) | 198 (2.97) |
3.3. Annual Prevalence of WMSDs in Nursing Professionals with Different Ages
Among the nurses with different ages, statistical differences were noticed in the prevalence of WMSDs in the recent 12 months and in 4 regions of the body including lower back, neck, shoulder, and back (P < 0.05). Chi-squared statistics revealed that age was significantly associated with the prevalence of WMSDs in the recent 12 months (χ2 = 289.885, P < 0.01) and the prevalence of WMSDs in lower back (χ2 = 168.715, P < 0.01), neck (χ2 = 250.122, P < 0.01), shoulder (χ2 = 152.239, P < 0.01), and back (χ2 = 108.742, P < 0.01). Compared with the subjects aged less than 25 yrs, remarkable increase was noticed in the prevalence of WMSDs in those aged 26–30 yrs (χ2 = 215.843, P < 0.01), 31–35 yrs (χ2 = 243.427, P < 0.01), 36–40 yrs (χ2 = 205.850, P < 0.01), and ≥41 yrs (χ2 = 266.530, P < 0.01). Compared with the subjects aged 26–30 yrs, remarkable increase was noticed in the prevalence of WMSDs in those aged 31–35 yrs (χ2 = 9.640, P < 0.01) and 36–40 yrs (χ2 = 34.502, P < 0.01) and those aged ≥41 yrs (χ2 = 41.915, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, compared with those aged 31–35 yrs, remarkable increase was identified in the prevalence of WMSDs in those aged 36–40 yrs (χ2 = 14.652, P < 0.01), and those aged ≥41 yrs (χ2 = 15.172, P < 0.01). Among the subjects aged 36–40 yrs, the most commonly affected regions were lower back and back, while, in those aged ≥41 yrs, the most affected regions were neck and shoulder (Table 3).
Table 3.
Annual prevalence of WMSDs in the nurses.
| Age | N (%) | In the recent 1 year | Lower back | Neck | Shoulder | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| ≤25 | 944 (14.14) | 497 (52.65) | 383 (40.57) | 359 (38.03) | 299 (31.67) | 224 (23.73) |
| 26–30 | 2693 (40.35) | 2095 (77.79)∗ | 1690 (62.76) | 1563 (58.04) | 1311 (48.68) | 1054 (39.14) |
| 31–35 | 1586 (23.76) | 1297 (81.7)∗,† | 1071 (67.53) | 1013 (63.87) | 837 (52.77) | 657 (41.42) |
| 36–40 | 567 (8.50) | 503 (88.71)∗,†,∆ | 412 (72.66) | 401 (70.72) | 329 (58.02) | 282 (49.74) |
| ≥41 | 884 (13.25) | 776 (87.78)∗,†,∆ | 629 (71.15) | 653 (73.87) | 538 (60.86) | 419 (47.40) |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 6674 (100.00) | 5168 (77.43) | 4185 (62.71) | 3989 (59.77) | 3314 (49.66) | 2636 (39.50) |
|
| ||||||
| χ 2 | — | 444.682 | 264.552 | 301.369 | 189.571 | 148.797 |
| P | — | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
∗ P < 0.01, compared with the nurses aged ≤25 yrs; †P < 0.01, compared with the nurses aged 26–30 yrs; ∆P < 0.01, compared with the nurses aged 31–35 yrs.
3.4. Annual Prevalence of WMSDs in Nursing Professionals with Different Working Time in the Departments
Statistical differences were noticed in the annual prevalence of WMSDs in the nurses with various working time in the institution in the recent 12 months, and the regions in the lower back, neck, shoulder, and back (P < 0.05). Chi square test revealed the annual prevalence of WMSDs increased with the age in the recent 12 months (χ2 = 254.504, P < 0.01), and the regions in the lower back (χ2 = 165.218, P < 0.01), neck (χ2 = 224.450, P < 0.01), shoulder (χ2 = 143.822, P < 0.01), and back (χ2 = 107.393, P < 0.01). Compared with those with a working time of less than 5 yrs, remarkable increase was observed in the annual prevalence of WMSDs in those with a working time of 6–10 yrs (χ2 = 159.381, P < 0.01), 11–15 yrs (χ2 = 134.476, P < 0.01), 16–20 yrs (χ2 = 113.865, P < 0.01), and 21 yrs or more (χ2 = 169.587, P < 0.01). Compared with those with a working time of 6–10 yrs, remarkable increase was observed in the annual prevalence of WMSDs in those with a working time of 16–20 yrs (χ2 = 19.448, P < 0.01) and 21 yrs or more (χ2 = 21.585, P < 0.01). Meanwhile, statistical difference was observed in the annual prevalence of WMSDs in those with a working time of 11–15 yrs compared with those with a working time of 16–20 yrs (χ2 = 9.269, P < 0.01). For the subjects with a working time of 16–20 years, the highest prevalence of WMSDs was noticed in the recent 12 months, lower back and back, while, in those with a working time of 21 or more, the most affected body regions were neck and shoulder (Table 4).
Table 4.
Annual prevalence of WMSDs in the nurses.
| Working duration | N (%) | In the recent 1 year | Lower back | Neck | Shoulder | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| ≤5 | 2020 (30.27) | 1283 (63.51) | 995 (49.26) | 946 (46.83) | 781 (38.66) | 610 (30.20) |
| 6–10 | 2260 (33.86) | 1825 (80.75)∗ | 1486 (65.75) | 1375 (60.84) | 1159 (51.28) | 924 (40.88) |
| 11–15 | 1107 (16.59) | 922 (83.29)∗,† | 778 (70.28) | 725 (65.49) | 595 (53.75) | 468 (42.28) |
| 16–20 | 447 (6.70) | 400 (89.49)∗,†,∆ | 325 (72.71) | 324 (72.48) | 265 (59.28) | 228 (51.01) |
| ≥21 | 840 (12.59) | 738 (87.86)∗,†,∆ | 601 (71.55) | 619 (73.69) | 514 (61.19) | 406 (48.33) |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 6674 (100.00) | 5168 (77.43) | 4185 (62.71) | 3989 (59.77) | 3314 (49.66) | 2636 (39.55) |
|
| ||||||
| χ 2 | — | 349.312 | 239.548 | 254.520 | 168.734 | 130.721 |
| P | — | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
∗ P < 0.01, compared with the nurses with a working duration of ≤5 yrs; †P < 0.01, compared with the nurses with a working duration of 6–10 yrs; ∆P < 0.01, compared with the nurses with a working duration of 11–15 yrs.
3.5. Annual Prevalence of WMSDs in Different Departments
Statistical differences were noticed in the annual prevalence of WMSDs in the nurses in different departments in the recent 12 months, and the regions in the lower back, neck, shoulder, and back (P < 0.05). Among the nurses working in the Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Surgery, Department of Emergency, and Department of Anesthesia, statistical differences were noted in those working in the prevalence of WMSDs. The prevalence of WMSDs was the highest in the Department of Emergency, while the prevalence was the lowest in the Internal Medicine Department (Table 5).
Table 5.
Annual prevalence of WMSDs in the nurses working in different department.
| Department | N (%) | In the recent 1 year | Lower back | Neck | Shoulder | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| Department of Internal Medicine | 2297 (34.42) | 1733 (75.45) | 1352 (58.86) | 1325 (57.68) | 1076 (46.84) | 825 (35.92) |
| Department of Surgery | 2223 (33.31) | 1732 (77.91) | 1410 (63.43) | 1335 (60.05) | 1123 (50.52) | 888 (39.95) |
| Department of Emergency | 1182 (17.71) | 945 (79.95)∗ | 821 (69.46) | 724 (61.25) | 622 (52.62) | 541 (45.77) |
| Department of Anesthesia | 443 (6.64) | 340 (76.75) | 264 (59.59) | 260 (58.69) | 208 (46.95) | 160 (36.12) |
| Supply room | 529 (7.93) | 418 (79.02) | 338 (63.89) | 345 (65.22) | 285 (53.88) | 222 (41.97) |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 6674 (100.00) | 5168 (77.43) | 4185 (62.71) | 3989 (59.77) | 3314 (49.66) | 2636 (39.50) |
|
| ||||||
| χ 2 | — | 10.643 | 40.230 | 12.054 | 17.150 | 35.441 |
| P | — | 0.031 | <0.001 | 0.017 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
∗ P < 0.01 compared with the nurses working in the Department of Internal Medicine.
3.6. Annual Prevalence of WMSDs in Nurses with Different Working Times
The annual prevalence of WMSDs increased in the lower back, neck, shoulder, and back of the nurses with the increase of the working duration (P < 0.01). Compared with those with a working time of 40 hr per week, significant increase was identified in the prevalence of WMSDs in those with a time of 41–50 hrs (χ2 = 40.187, P < 0.01) and with a time of ≥51 hrs (χ2 = 17.135, P < 0.01, Table 6).
Table 6.
Prevalence of WMSDs in the nurses with various working duration per week.
| Working duration per week | N (%) | In the recent 1 year | Lower back | Neck | Shoulder | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| ≤40 | 974 (14.59) | 676 (69.40) | 516 (52.98) | 497 (51.03) | 434 (44.56) | 354 (36.34) |
| 41~50 | 5366 (80.40) | 4221 (78.66)∗ | 3432 (63.96) | 3261 (60.77) | 2671 (49.78) | 2110 (39.32) |
| ≥51 | 334 (5.00) | 271 (81.14)∗ | 237 (70.96) | 231 (69.16) | 209 (62.5) | 172 (51.50) |
|
| ||||||
| Total | 6674 (100.00) | 5168 (77.43) | 4185 (62.71) | 3989 (59.77) | 3314 (49.66) | 2636 (39.50) |
|
| ||||||
| χ 2 | — | 43.191 | 52.743 | 45.455 | 32.454 | 24.245 |
| P | — | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
∗ P < 0.05, compared with nurses with a working duration of less than 40 hrs per week.
3.7. Identification of Risk Factors for the WMSDs
Logistic regression analysis was performed using the variables including age, working time in the institution, gender, race, BMI, academic degree, health conditions, shift, and working times per week. The results indicated a working time of ≥6 yrs, working in the Emergency Department, Department of Anesthesia, Department of Supply Room, shift, night shift of more than 1 per week, working time of ≥40 hrs per week, poor health conditions, and fatigue were the risk factors of WMSDs. In contrast, rest during the shift, a rest lasting for >10 min and no disease history of WMSDs were the protective factors for WMSDs (Table 7).
Table 7.
Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors of WMSDs in nurses.
| Factor | P | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Working duration | <0.001 | |
| 6–10 | <0.001 | 2.131 (1.834–2.475) |
| 11–15 | <0.001 | 2.829 (2.324–3.445) |
| 16–20 | <0.001 | 5.368 (3.823–7.537) |
| ≥21 | <0.001 | 6.899 (5.281–9.011) |
| Department | 0.001 | |
| Department of Surgery | 0.056 | 1.156 (0.997–1.340) |
| Department of Emergency | 0.003 | 1.331 (1.104–1.605) |
| Department of Anesthesia | 0.002 | 1.524 (1.164–1.995) |
| Supply room | 0.008 | 1.436 (1.100–1.874) |
| Frequency of rest during working | <0.001 | 0.792 (0.719–0.871) |
| Accumulated working time | <0.001 | |
| <10 min | <0.001 | 0.338 (0.251–0.455) |
| 10–30 min | <0.001 | 0.429 (0.323–0.569) |
| >30 min | <0.001 | 0.115 (0.072–0.183) |
| Shift | <0.001 | 2.479 (1.877–3.274) |
| Night shift per month | <0.001 | |
| 1–5 times | <0.001 | 2.606 (2.082–3.262) |
| 6–9 times | <0.001 | 3.654 (2.941–4.539) |
| ≥10 times | <0.001 | 3.763 (2.996–4.728) |
| With no previous disease history | <0.001 | 0.646 (0.563–0.742) |
| Working time per week | <0.001 | 1.376 (1.186–1.597) |
| Health status | <0.001 | 1.587 (1.429–1.764) |
| Work-related fatigue | <0.001 | 1.431 (1.314–1.559) |
4. Discussion
Individuals involved in the nursing profession are more susceptible to the WMSDs. According to a previous study, excessive work load and nonstandard work posture were the risk factors for the WMSDs [15]. In a national survey, the annual prevalence of WMSDs and the weekly prevalence of WMSDs were 93% and 64.1%, respectively [16]. In China, the reported prevalence of WMSDs was in a range of 56.62% to 78.6% [17]. In this study, the prevalence of WMSDs and the weekly prevalence of WMSDs were 77.43% and 44.79%, respectively. Besides, the prevalence was higher in the lower back (62.71%), neck (59.77%), shoulder (49.66%), and back (39.50%). In Sudary region, the frequency of low back bending (such as long pushing or pulling) and activity limitation was high in the nursing professionals [18]. Particularly, the carrying and lifting factors, such as changing the bed sheet and body turn-over of patients, may induce the incidence of OMSI. Besides, a large number of nurses may suffer from injury during patient transfer. In the past decades, principles for patient transfer were issued by the Royal Nursing School and American Nurse Association (ANA) in order to prevent the potential injuries to the nurses during the patient transfer, as well as reducing the incidence of low back pain and the development and/or recurrence of WMSDs [19]. In China, no such guidelines have been established by the government or local authorities.
In this study, the ages of the nurses were identified as the risk factor of WMSDs. Aged nurses showed a longer working duration (r = 0.917, P < 0.01). Despite the fact that age was not entered into the regression equation, it was considered that the incidence of WMSDs may increase with the increase of the age and working duration [20]. Besides, the work load may increase with the extension of the work duration, and the work load increased in the presence of compulsive position, which may finally induce the increase of prevalence of WMSDs [11]. Moreover, the interruption of the work load and working balance of the body may contribute to the generation of chronic overload, which may be also a potential factor for the pathogenesis of WMSDs.
Nurses working in the Emergency Department showed the highest prevalence of WMSDs, followed by those working in the Supply Room, Department of Surgery, and Department of Anesthesia. In the Emergency Department, the nurses were involved in frequent lifting and pushing in the clinical practice. Besides, these individuals were exposed to a long-term high stress, which may induce WMSDs. For the individuals in the Supply Room, they were frequently involved in long-term standing, persistent head bowing, and frequent transfer of the medical facilities. For the nurses in the Operating Room, the work load in the local muscles increased under a static condition, which may induce interruption in the blood circulation. The fatigue of muscles and bones caused by frequent lifting and pushing was an important risk factor of low back pain in the nurses. Simultaneously, long-term high pressure and fast working frequency may induce sever muscle injuries.
Working time of 50 hrs per week and a daily working time of 8.5 hrs were considered as a risk factor for the WMSDs. In this study, the working time of the nurses in our hospital was in a range of 30–65 hrs and the weekly time was 46.87 ± 4.42. According to the multivariate analysis, adequate rest was a protective factor for the WMSDs. In a previous study, Wang et al. revealed that a rest time of 15 min could guarantee the recovery of erector muscle of spine and heart rate into the normal range [21]. Therefore, adequate rest is recommended for the nurses involved in the nursing profession [6], in order to attenuate the stress and relax the muscle tissues, as well as eliminate the fatigue of muscles.
There are limitations in our study. Despite the fact that a large number of nurses working in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region were included in this study, the sample number is not large enough to bring completely accurate data for the WMSDs in the nurses. Meanwhile, it is not adequate to establish a system to prevent the incidence of WMSDs in the nurses. In future, we will focus on the study of how to prevent the WMSDs in the nursing population.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we aim to investigate the status of WMSDs in the nurses in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region. Our data indicated that shift and working/rest duration were closely related to the prevalence of WMSDs. In future, further measures should be taken to arrange for appropriate shift and rest in order to decrease the incidence of WMSDs.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Science and Technology Institute, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (no. 2015211C075).
Abbreviations
- WMSDs:
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders
- NMQ:
Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
Disclosure
Fuye Li is the first coauthor.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors' Contributions
Ping Yan and Fuye Li contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Turner J. A., Franklin G., Fulton-Kehoe D., et al. Prediction of chronic disability in work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a prospective, population-based study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2004;5, article 14 doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taanila H., Suni J., Pihlajamäki H., et al. Musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a one-year follow-up study in the Finnish Defence Forces. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2009;10(1, article 89) doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Demure B., Luippold R. S., Bigelow C., Ali D., Mundt K. A., Liese B. Video display terminal workstation improvement program: I. Baseline associations between musculoskeletal discomfort and ergonomic features of workstations. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2000;42(8):783–791. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200008000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silva A. G., Sa-Couto P., Queirós A., Neto M., Rocha N. P. Pain, pain intensity and pain disability in high school students are differently associated with physical activity, screening hours and sleep. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017;18, article 194 doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1557-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Su Z., Zhou A. S. Background of discussion on International Labor Organization occupational diseases list and its inspiration for China. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2006;24(51):257–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Buxton O. M., Hopcia K., Sembajwe G., et al. Relationship of sleep deficiency to perceived pain and functional limitations in hospital patient care workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2012;54(7):851–858. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31824e6913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tinubu B. M., Mbada C. E., Oyeyemi A. L., Fabunmi A. A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010;11, article 12 doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Becker S. G., De Oliveira M. L. C. Study on the absenteeism of nursing professionals in a psychiatric center in Manaus, Brazil. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2008;16(1):109–114. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692008000100017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tezel A. Musculoskeletal complaints among a group of Turkish nurses. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;115(6):871–880. doi: 10.1080/00207450590897941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Miranda H., Punnett L., Gore R. J. Musculoskeletal pain and reported workplace assault: a prospective study of clinical staff in nursing homes. Human Factors. 2014;56(1):215–227. doi: 10.1177/0018720813508778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yasobant S., Rajkumar P. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among health care professionals: a cross-sectional assessment of risk factors in a tertiary hospital, India. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2014;18(2):75–81. doi: 10.4103/0019-5278.146896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Serranheira F., Sousa-Uva M., Sousa-Uva A. Hospital nurses tasks and work-related musculoskeletal disorders symptoms: a detailed analysis. Work. 2015;51(3):401–409. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Du W. W., Wang S., Wang J. X., et al. The assessment of reliability and validity of musculoskeletal questionnaire. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2012;30(5):335–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Punnett L., Wegman D. H. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2004;14(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.da Costa B. R., Vieira E. R. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2010;53(3):285–323. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mohan V., Justine M., Jagannathan M., Bt Aminudin S., Bt Johari S. H. Preliminary study of the patterns and physical risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among academicians in a higher learning institute. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2015;20(2):410–417. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0682-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu L., Chen S. G., Tang S. C., et al. How work organization affects the prevalence of wmsds: a case-control study. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. 2015;28(9):627–633. doi: 10.3967/bes2015.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Al Dajah S., Al Daghdi A. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among nurses in SUDAYR region. European Scientific Journal. 2013;9(33):198–205. [Google Scholar]
- 19.American Nurses Association. Handle With CareⓇ, 2004, http://www.nursingworld.org/handlewithcare.
- 20.Vasiliadou A., Karvountzis G., Roumeliotis D., Soumilas A., Plati C., Nomikos I. Factors associated with back pain in nursing staff: a survey in Athens, Greece. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 1997;3(1):15–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.1997.00015.pp.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Z. L., Wu L., Song T. B., et al. Experimental study of evaluating the breaks of manual lifting task with the method of Surface electromyography and lectrocardiogram. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2011;29(2):167–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]