Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jan 23;56(9):2440–2444. doi: 10.1002/anie.201607845

Efficient Access to Chiral Trisubstituted Aziridines via Catalytic Enantioselective Aza-Darzens Reactions

Barry M Trost 1,, Tanguy Saget 1, Chao-I (Joey) Hung 1
PMCID: PMC5530870  NIHMSID: NIHMS872867  PMID: 28111864

Abstract

Herein, we report a Zn-ProPhenol catalyzed aza-Darzens reaction using chlorinated aromatic ketones as nucleophilic partners for the efficient and enantioselective construction of complex trisubstituted aziridines. The α-chloro-β-aminoketone intermediates featuring a chlorinated tetrasubstituted stereocenter can be isolated in high yields and selectivities for further derivatization. Alternatively, they can be directly transformed to the corresponding aziridines in a one pot fashion. Of note, the reaction can be run on gram-scale with low catalyst loading without impacting its efficiency. Moreover, this methodology was extended to α-bromoketones which are scarcely used in enantioselective catalysis because of their sensitivity and lack of accessibility.

Keywords: aza-Darzens, asymmetric catalysis, Mannich reaction, Zn-ProPhenol, tertiary chloride


graphic file with name nihms872867u1.jpg

A Zn-ProPhenol catalysed aza-Darzens reaction using α-chloroketones allows the efficient construction of challenging trisubstituted aziridines with high enantio- and diastereoselectivities (up to 98% ee, >20:1 d.r.). This method also provides an efficient access to complex chlorinated molecules featuring a tertiary stereogenic chloride.


Because of their inherent ring strain, aziridines are versatile synthetic intermediates for the synthesis of complex nitrogen-containing molecules.[1] Moreover, the aziridine motif is also found in many natural products and bioactive compounds.[2e] In this context, stereoselective methods to access aziridine moieties are particularly relevant. The enantioselective synthesis of aziridines has largely improved over the last two decades.[2] However, despite these improvements the construction of densely substituted chiral aziridines still represents a synthetic challenge.[2e] To date, there are only a very limited number of catalytic enantioselective methods to access trisubstituted aziridines.[2d,3] So far, the two reported approaches are depicted in Scheme 1: a) reaction of carbenoids with aldimines or ketimines[4]; b) nitrogen delivery to a Michael-acceptor.[5] A third approach represented in Scheme 1c has been overlooked, probably because of the lack of stereoselective methods to access the key α-chloro-β-aminoketone intermediates.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of trisubstituted aziridines.

Chloroenolates are powerful nucleophiles for the synthesis of stereogenic chlorides adjacent to a carbonyl group, a motif that is commonly found in natural products.[6]] Chloroenolates are also useful coupling partners for aza-Darzens reactions to access aziridine motifs.[2b] In this context, their use is mostly restricted to diastereoselective reactions using stoichiometric amounts of chiral reagents.[7] To date, the only reported catalytic enantioselective aza-Darzens reaction is restricted to chloroacetylacetone, which affords aziridines possessing a single stereogenic center (Scheme 2a).[8]

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Aza-Darzens reactions using chloroenolates.

More generally, the catalytic enantioselective use of chloroenolates is extremely scarce and limited to stabilized enolates derived from chlorinated 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds[9] or 3-chlorooxindoles.[10] There are two examples wherein only α-chloroaldehydes can be functionalized via an enamine mode of activity using organocatalysis.[11] The lack of catalytic enantioselective reactions with non-stabilized chloroenolates from α-chloroketones clearly highlights the need for new competent catalytic systems able to perform such reactions. The approach reported herein also highlights the importance of the ability to adjust the catalyst electronically and sterically to tune selectivity/reactivity.

ProPhenol ligands form dinuclear main group metal catalysts when treated with an alkyl metal reagent such as Et2Zn (Scheme 3).[12] These chiral bimetallic complexes contain a Lewis acidic and Brønsted basic site and are capable of activating both an electrophile and a nucleophile.[13]

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis and structure of a Zn-ProPhenol bimetallic catalyst.

The Zn-ProPhenol catalytic system is well-suited for direct enantioselective aldol and Mannich-type reactions.[14] We wondered if this catalytic system could perform enantioselective reactions with non-stabilized chloroenolates to access complex chlorinated molecules that can be converted to trisubstituted aziridines or isolated for alternative usages.

The first hurdle toward the synthesis of trisubstituted aziridines was the development of an unprecedented enantioselective Mannich reaction using substituted α-chloroketones. We initiated our studies by reacting chloroindanone 1a with imine 2a in the presence of our standard Zn-ProPhenol catalyst L1 (Table 1). When the reaction was run in THF, α-chloro-β-aminoketone 3aa was obtained in a moderate yield and with good selectivities (entry 1). The use of a less coordinating solvent such as diethyl ether resulted in a marked increase of reactivity providing 3aa quantitatively together with excellent enantio- and diastereoselectivity (entry 2). The reaction proceeds equally well at room temperature (entry 3). However, when this set of conditions was applied to chlorotetralone 1d, compound 3da was obtained as a 2.0:1 mixture of diastereoisomers (entry 4). The use of other solvents such as THF or toluene did not improve the diastereomeric ratio (entries 5–6). We then investigated the use of non-C2-symmetric ProPhenol ligands L2L4 which proved to be differential for the enantioselective vinylation of N-Boc imines.[15] L2 and L3 did not surpass the standard ProPhenol ligand L1 (entries 7–8). However, the use of the more polarized donor-acceptor ligand L4 significantly improved the diastereoselectivity of the reaction and provided compound 3da with 96% ee (entry 9). This effect was even more pronounced when the reaction was run at 23°C as the diastereomeric ratio could be increased to 6.0:1 (entry 10). Finally, the use of L4 with substrate 1a gave 3aa quantitatively with increased enantioselectivity (entry 11 vs entry 2) and the reaction was complete in less than one hour. The superiority of a non-C2-symmetric ProPhenol ligand for this reaction highlights the importance of having two differentiated but complementary Zn-centers within the dinuclear complex for an optimal catalytic activity.

Table 1.

Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]

graphic file with name nihms872867u2.jpg

entry 1 L solvent, T yield[b] d.r.[c] ee[d]
1[e] 1a L1 THF (0.2 M), 40°C 56% >20:1 93%
2 1a L1 Et2O (0.2 M), 40°C 99% >20:1 95%
3 1a L1 Et2O (0.2 M), 23°C 99% >20:1 97%
4 1d L1 Et2O (0.2 M), 40°C 99% 2.0:1 91%
5[f] 1d L1 THF (1.0 M), 60°C 99% 1.3:1 79%
6 1d L1 toluene (0.4 M), 40°C 99% 2.0:1 75%
7 1d L2 Et2O (0.2 M), 40°C 90% 2.2:1 91%
8 1d L3 Et2O (0.2 M), 40°C 99% 1.1:1 91%
9 1d L4 Et2O (0.2 M), 40°C 99% 3.4:1 96%
10[g] 1d L4 Et2O (0.2 M), 23°C 86% 6.0:1 94%
11[h] 1a L4 Et2O (0.2 M), 40°C 99% >20:1 97%
[a]

Reaction conditions: 0.20 mmol 1, 0.22 mmol 2, 5 mol% L, 10 mol% Et2Zn (1M in hexanes), 3 Å molecular sieves (5 mg), in Et2O (sealed tube) for 14–16 h at the indicated temperature and concentration.

[b]

Isolated yield.

[c]

Determined by 1H-NMR analysis.

[d]

Determined by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase.

[e]

With 20 mol% of L1 and 40 mol% of Et2Zn.

[f]

With 10 mol% of L1 and 20 mol% of Et2Zn.

[g]

Reaction time was 28h.

[h]

Reaction time was 1h.

We then evaluated the generality of the reaction with a range of chloroketones (Scheme 4). Several chloroindanones were successfully reacted with aromatic N-Boc imines (3ba3ab). The relative and absolute configuration of 3ba was unambiguously established by X-ray crystallographic analysis[16] and, by analogy, the same configuration was assigned to all compounds 3. Interestingly, vinyl imines can be successfully used with our standard conditions as shown with 3ac. Chlorotetralone 1d and chloro-furanocyclohexanone 1e afforded 3da and 3ea with 3.4:1 and 3.2:1 d.r. respectively. However, in both cases the two diastereoisomers could be easily separated by flash chromatography to afford diastereomerically pure compounds α-chloro-β-amine in good yield. Chloroketones based on the chromanone and benzosuberone skeletons gave the desired product 3fa and 3ga in high yields and selectivities. Of note, when L4 was replaced by L1, 3ga was obtained with much lower enantioselectivity (72% ee with L1 vs 95% ee with L4) showcasing the superiority of L4 for this reaction. We are currently working on the use of acyclic chloroketones which represent a limitation for our present catalytic system.[17]

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Scope of the reaction.

The catalytic enantioselective use of non-stabilized bromoenolates is extremely scarce.[18] In this context, we were pleased to extend the scope of the reaction to α-bromoketones using our standard protocol (Scheme 4). Indeed, the 5 and 7 membered bromo-benzocycloalkanones were successfully coupled with both N-Boc and N-Cbz imines to afford the corresponding α-bromo-β-aminoketones 3ha–3ia and 3ka in high yield and perfect selectivities. To the best of our knowledge, the catalytic enantioselective use of bromoketones to access tertiary stereogenic bromides was unprecedented prior to this work.

To showcase the scalability and the practicality of the process, we performed a gram-scale reaction using 1a and 1.05 equivalent of imine 2a (Scheme 5). The catalyst loading could be reduced to only 1 mol% without impacting the outcome of the reaction.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Gram-scale reaction with low catalyst loading.

With a robust and enantioselective process in hand to access α-chloro-β-aminoketones 3, we then investigated their transformation to the corresponding aziridines 4 (Scheme 6). After some optimization, two different protocols were developed. Protocol A was Cs2CO3 in acetonitrile as solvent. When this protocol was applied to α-chloro-β-aminoketones derived from chloroindanones 1a–c, the desired aziridines were obtained quantitatively. However, this protocol was not compatible with substrates derived from chlorotetralone 1d, chloro-furanocyclohexanone 1e, or chlorochromanones 1f for which a significant amount of chloride elimination was observed. In this case, switching to protocol B, using NaH in THF, completely prevented elimination to afford the aziridines quantitatively. The relative configuration of 4da was confirmed by NOE analysis and is consistent with an aziridine formation via an invertive SN2 displacement of the chloride.[19]

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6

Synthesis of trisubstituted aziridines 4 from β-fluoroamines 3.

To further expand the practicality of this reaction, we wished to develop a one-pot process to provide a direct access to trisusbtituted aziridines 4 starting from chloroketones 1. To this end, Cs2CO3 or NaH were directly added after completion of the coupling reaction between 1 and 2 (Scheme 7). When Cs2CO3 is used as a base, the addition of Florisil® is required to observe conversion to the aziridine. We believe that Florisil® acts as a scavenger of the Zn-ProPhenol catalyst which otherwise inhibits the aziridine formation. We successfully applied this one-pot procedure to the synthesis of aziridines 4aa and 4af which were previously obtained with comparable yields and selectivities (vide supra). Given the efficiency in which the α-chloro-β-aminoketones of Scheme 3 cyclize to aziridines as shown in Scheme 5, we believe the remaining examples of Scheme 3 obviously will follow in the one-pot process. Thus, to demonstrate the even broader generality of our process, we performed additional examples via the one-pot reaction with a variety of different imines to efficiently access new trisubstituted aziridines 4 without the need to isolate the corresponding α-chloro-β-aminoketone intermediates 3.

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7

One-pot synthesis of aziridines 4 from chloroketones 1.

To demonstrate the utility of this method we first attempted to further elaborate some compounds 3 to prove their versatility as synthetic intermediates in processes other than aziridine formation (Scheme 8). Interestingly, when α-chloro-β-aminoketone 3aa was reacted with 1.5 equivalent of a silver salt in DMF at 60°C, the cyclization mode could be diverted to access oxazolidinone 5 instead of aziridine 4aa. In our hands, silver nitrate provided a better yield than silver triflate (95% vs 85% yield). In the case of compound 3ha bearing a tertiary bromide, an intermolecular SN2 displacement by sodium azide could outcompete the intramolecular formation of aziridine 4aa. The resulting product 6 corresponds to a formal syn-selective diamination of a chalcone derivative with two synthetically differentiable nitrogen atoms. Of note, when this reaction was attempted with 3aa, the reaction was sluggish and decomposition was observed upon heating. This result highlights the strong synthetic potential of these bromoketone adducts. We then focused on aziridine elaborations. First, 3aa was deprotected using TFA and the resulting crude mixture was directly subjected to an amide coupling to afford aziridine 7 in 71% overall yield. Additionally, a diastereoselective reduction of ketone 4aa was developed to afford benzylic alcohol 8 with complete control of the diastereoselectivity.

Scheme 8.

Scheme 8

Synthetic applications.

In summary, we have developed the first catalytic enantioselective aza-Darzens reaction to access complex trisubstituted aziridines starting from readily available chloroketones. Our bimetallic catalytic system is based on a non-C2-symmetric ProPhenol ligand and allows the enantioselective use of non-stabilized chloroenolates. The reaction proceeds via a transient Zn-enolate to afford α-chloro-β-aminoketone intermediates featuring a tertiary stereogenic chloride. These intermediates were isolated in high yields and selectivities and then further elaborated. Alternatively, they could directly afford chiral trisubstituted aziridines in a one pot fashion. Finally, the scope of the reaction was extended to sensitive bromoketones that are scarcely used in enantioselective catalysis. Further work on the enantioselective use of bromo- and chloroenolates is ongoing in our laboratories and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE-1360634) and the National Institute of Health (GM033049) for their generous support of our programs. We warmly thank Matthew D. Smith (Stanford University) for X-ray crystallographic analysis and Jacob S. Tracy (Stanford University) for conducting NOE experiments. T.S. is extremely grateful to the Swiss National Science Foundation for a fellowship.

References

  • 1.For reviews, see: McCoull W, Davis FA. Synthesis. 2000:1347–1365.Sweeney JB. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002;31:247–258. doi: 10.1039/b006015l.Watson IDG, Yu L, Yudin AK. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006;39:194–206. doi: 10.1021/ar050038m.Singh GS, D’hooge M, De Kimpe N. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:2080–2135. doi: 10.1021/cr0680033.Schneider C. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:2116–2118. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2009, 48, 2082–2084.Stankovic S, D’hooge M, Catak S, Eum H, Waroquier M, Van Speybroeck V, De Kimpe N, Ha H-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41:643–665. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15140a.Njardarson JT. Synlett. 2013:787–803.Callebaut G, Meiresonne T, De Kimpe N, Mangelinckx S. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:7954–8015. doi: 10.1021/cr400582d.Rotstein BH, Zaretsky S, Rai V, Yudin AK. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:8323–8359. doi: 10.1021/cr400615v.He Z, Zajdlik A, Yudin AK. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014;47:1029–1040. doi: 10.1021/ar400210c.For selected recent examples in total synthesis, see: Menjo Y, Hamajima A, Sasaki N, Hamada Y. Org. Lett. 2011;13:5744–5747. doi: 10.1021/ol2023054.Mei R-H, Liu Z-G, Cheng H, Xu L, Wang F-P. Org. Lett. 2013;15:2206–2209. doi: 10.1021/ol400755x.Gerstner NG, Adams CS, Grigg RD, Tretbar M, Rigoli JW, Schomaker JM. Org. Lett. 2016;18:284–287. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03453.
  • 2.For reviews, see: Zhang Y, Lu Z, Wulff WD. Synlett. 2009:2715–2739.Sweeney J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009:4911–4919.Pellissier H. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:1509–1555.Pellissier H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014;356:1899–1935.Degennaro L, Trinchera P, Luisi R. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:7881–7929. doi: 10.1021/cr400553c.Zhu Y, Wang Q, Cornwall RG, Shi Y. Chem. Rev. 2014;114:8199–8256. doi: 10.1021/cr500064w.
  • 3.For diastereoselective syntheses of trisubstituted aziridines using stoichiometric amounts of chiral reagents, see: Davis FA, Deng J, Zhang Y, Haltiwanger RC. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:7135–7143.Chemla F, Ferreira F. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:8244–8250. doi: 10.1021/jo0490696.Morton D, Pearson D, Field RA, Stockman RA. Chem. Commun. 2006:1833–1835. doi: 10.1039/b601527a.Moragas T, Churcher I, Lewis W, Stockman RA. Org. Lett. 2014;16:6290–6293. doi: 10.1021/ol502967x.
  • 4.a) Huang L, Wulff WD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:8892–8895. doi: 10.1021/ja203754p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Hashimoto T, Nakatsu H, Yamamoto K, Maruoka K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:9730–9733. doi: 10.1021/ja203901h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) De Vincentiis F, Bencivenni G, Pesciaioli F, Mazzanti A, Bartoli G, Galzerano P, Melchiorre P. Chem. Asian J. 2010;5:1652–1656. doi: 10.1002/asia.201000040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Deiana L, Dziedzic P, Zhao G-J, Vesely J, Ibrahem I, Rios R, Sun J, Cordova A. Chem. Eur. J. 2011;17:7904–7917. doi: 10.1002/chem.201100042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Halskov KS, Naicker T, Jensen ME, Jorgensen KA. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:6382–6384. doi: 10.1039/c3cc43506g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Molnar IG, Tanzer E-M, Daniliuc C, Gilmour R. Chem. Eur. J. 2014;20:794–800. doi: 10.1002/chem.201303586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For a recent review on chlorinated natural products, see: Chung W-J, Vanderwal CD. Angew. Chem. 2016;128:4470–4510. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506388. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 4396–4434.For natural products featuring an α-chloroketone motif, see: Soria-Mercado IE, Prieto-Davo A, Jensen PR, Fenical W. J. Nat. Prod. 2005;68:904–910. doi: 10.1021/np058011z.Diaz-Marrero AR, Brito I, de la Rosa JM, Darias J, Cueto M. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:10821–10824.Winter JM, Jansma AL, Handel TM, Moore BS. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:781–784. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805140. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2009, 48, 767–770.Zhang W, Liu Z, Li S, Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhang H, Zhang G, Zhu Y, Zhang G, Zhang W, Liu J, Zhang C. J. Nat. Prod. 2012;75:1937–1943. doi: 10.1021/np300505y.
  • 7.For the syntheses of chiral disubstituted aziridines via aza-Darzens reactions using stoichiometric amounts of chiral reagents, see: Fujisawa T, Hayakawa R, Shimizu M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992;33:7903–7906.Davis FA, Zhou P, Reddy GV. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:3243–3245.Davis FA, Zhou P, Liang C-H, Reddy RE. Tetrahedron Asymm. 1995;6:1511–1514.Cantrill AA, Hall LD, Jarvis AN, Osborn HMI, Raphy J, Sweeney JB. Chem. Commun. 1996:2631–2632.Gennari C, Pain G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:3747–3750.Sweeney JB, Cantrill AA, McLaren AB, Thobhani S. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:3681–3693.Sweeney JB, Cantrill AA, McLaren AB, Thobhani S. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:3694–3703.Valdez SC, Leighton JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:14638–14639. doi: 10.1021/ja9066354.Sola TM, Churcher I, Lewis W, Stockman RA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:5034–5035. doi: 10.1039/c1ob05561e.Colpaert F, Mangelinckx S, De Brabandere S, De Kimpe N. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:2204–2213. doi: 10.1021/jo200082w.Marsini MA, Reeves JT, Desrosiers J-N, Herbage M, Savoie J, Li Z, Fandrick KR, Sader CA, McKibben B, Gao DA, Cui J, Gonnella NC, Lee H, Wei X, Roschangar F, Lu BZ, Senanayake CH. Org. Lett. 2015;17:5614–5617. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02838.
  • 8.Larson SE, Li G, Rowland GB, Junge D, Huang R, Woodcock HL, Antilla JC. Org. Lett. 2011;13:2188–2191. doi: 10.1021/ol200407r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Okino T, Hoashi Y, Furukawa T, Xu X, Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:119–125. doi: 10.1021/ja044370p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Nichols PJ, DeMattei JA, Barnett BR, LeFur NA, Chuang T-H, Piscopio AD, Koch K. Org. Lett. 2006;8:1495–1498. doi: 10.1021/ol060398p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Andres JM, Manzano R, Pedrosa R. Chem. Eur. J. 2008;14:5116–5119. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Han X, Kwiatkowski J, Xue F, Huang K-W, Lu Y. Angew. Chem. 2009;121:7740–7743. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2009, 48, 7604–7607. [Google Scholar]; e) Xuan Y-N, Nie S-Z, Dong L-T, Zhang J-M, Yan M. Org. Lett. 2009;11:1583–1586. doi: 10.1021/ol900227j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wang Z, Chen D, Yang Z, Bai S, Liu X, Lin L, Feng X. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:10130–10136. doi: 10.1002/chem.201001129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Hatano M, Horibe T, Ishihara K. Org. Lett. 2010;12:3502–3505. doi: 10.1021/ol101353r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Chauhan P, Chimni SS. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011;353:3203–3212. [Google Scholar]; i) Liu W-B, Reeves CM, Stoltz BM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:17298–17301. doi: 10.1021/ja4097829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Hong S, Kim M, Jung M, Ha MW, Lee M, Park Y, Kim M-H, Kim T-S, Lee J, Park H-G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014;12:1510–1517. doi: 10.1039/c3ob42107d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) Bae HY, Song CE. ACS Catal. 2015;5:3613–3619. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) Noole A, Jarving I, Werner F, Lopp M, Malkov A, Kanger T. Org. Lett. 2012;14:4922–4925. doi: 10.1021/ol302245b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dou X, Yao W, Zhou B, Lu Y. Chem. Commun. 2013;49:9224–9226. doi: 10.1039/c3cc45369c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.a) Shibatomi K, Yamamoto H. Angew. Chem. 2008;121:7740–7743. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801682. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2008, 47, 5796–5798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Quintard A, Alexakis A. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:4085–4087. doi: 10.1039/c000326c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.For an X-ray structure of a Zn-Prophenol species, see: Xiao Y, Wang Z, Ding K. Chem. Eur. J. 2005;11:3668–3678. doi: 10.1002/chem.200401159.
  • 13.Trost BM, Ito H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:12003–12004. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.For a review, see: Trost BM, Bartlett MJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48:688–701. doi: 10.1021/ar500374r.For our recent work on Mannich reactions, see: Trost BM, Hung C-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:15940–15946. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b11248.Trost BM, Saget T, Lerchen A, Hung C-I. Angew. Chem. 2016;128:791–794. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509719. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2016, 47, 781–784.Trost BM, Saget T, Hung C-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:3659–3662. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01187.
  • 15.Trost BM, Hung C-I, Koester DC, Miller Y. Org. Lett. 2015;17:3778–3781. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crystallographic data for 3ba: CCDC1497490 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
  • 17.When 2-chloropropiophenone was used with the reaction conditions described in Table 1 (entry 9), the corresponding Mannich adduct was obtained in 41% yield and 2.2:1 d.r. The major diastereoisomer was formed with 40% ee.
  • 18.a) Kuang Y, Lu Y, Tang Y, Liu X, Lin L, Feng X. Org. Lett. 2014;16:4244–4247. doi: 10.1021/ol501941n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Morita Y, Yamamoto T, Nagai H, Shimizu Y, Kanai M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:7075–7078. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.See the supporting information for details.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES