Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jul 27;7:46868. doi: 10.1038/srep46868

Corrigendum: Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis in China: Comparative Microbiology and Therapeutic Implications

Lei Shi, Dan Wu, Lei Wei, Suxia Liu, Peng Zhao, Bo Tu, Yangxin Xie, Yanan Liu, Xinhua Wang, Liying Liu, Xin Zhang, Zhe Xu, Fusheng Wang, Enqiang Qin
PMCID: PMC5531374  PMID: 28751655

Scientific Reports 7: Article number: 46025; 10.1038/srep46025 published online: April 06 2017; updated: July 27 2017.

The original version of this Article contained errors. In the Abstract,

“The patients in the community-acquired SBP (n = 311) and the nosocomial SBP (n = 264) groups exhibited significant differences in clinical symptoms (P < 0.01)”.

now reads:

“The patients in the community-acquired SBP (n = 264) and the nosocomial SBP (n = 311) groups exhibited significant differences in clinical symptoms (P < 0.01)”.

In the Results section, under subheading ‘Basic patient information’,

“Patients were divided into either nosocomial (n = 264) or community-acquired groups (n = 311) according to the type of infection”.

now reads:

“Patients were divided into either nosocomial (n = 311) or community-acquired groups (n = 264) according to the type of infection”.

As a result, the values of the columns ‘Community-acquired (n, %)’ and ‘Nosocomial (n, %)’ in Table 2 were incorrect.

Table 2. Bacteria distributions in ascitic fluid.

  Total (n, %) Community-acquired (n, %) Nosocomial (n, %) P value
GB 293 156 137 0.92
Escherichia coli 153 (26.6) 78 (50) 75 (54.7) 0.68
Klebsiella pneumoniae 75 (13.0) 35 (22.4) 40 (29.2) 0.66
Acinetobacter baumannii 7 (1.2) 5 (3.2) 2 (1.6) 0.15
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4 (0.7) 2 (1.3) 2 (1.6) 0.82
Enterobacter sp. 17 (3.0) 12 (7.7) 5 (3.6) 0.03
Serratia marcescens 2 (0.3) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.7) 0.87
Serratia fonticola 2 (0.3) 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 0.11
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 3 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 3 (2.2) 0.12
Pseudomonas putida 3 (0.5) 3 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 0.05
Bacterium vulgare 3 (0.5) 2 (1.3) 1 (0.7) 0.44
Proteus mirabilis 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.7) 0.37
Burkholderia cepacia 3 (0.5) 2 (1.3) 1 (0.7) 0.44
Acinetobacter lwoffii 1 (0.2) 1(0.6) 0 (0.0) 0.26
Salmonella 4 (0.7) 3 (1.9) 1 (0.7) 0.22
Shigella spp 5 (0.9) 4 (2.6) 1 (0.7) 0.11
Morganella morganii 3 (0.5) 1 (0.6) 2 (1.5) 0.70
Citrobacter 3 (0.5) 1 (0.6) 2 (1.5) 0.70
Haemophilus influenzae 2 (0.3) 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 0.11
Achromobacter xylosoxidans 2 (0.3) 2 (1.3) 0 (0.0) 0.11
G+C 279 107 172 0.04
Coagulase-negative staphylococcus 131 (22.8) 56 (52.3) 75 (43.6) 0.68
Staphylococcus aureus 30 (5.2) 9 (8.4) 21 (12.2) 0.10
Staphylococcus lugdunensis 1 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 0.37
Faecalis 52 (9.0) 15 (14.0) 37 (21.5) <0.01
Faecium 18 (1.7) 5 (4.7) 13 (7.6) <0.05
Other Enterococcus 6 (1.0) 1 (0.9) 5 (2.9) <0.05
Streptococcus Pneumoniae 1 (0.2) 1 (0.9) 0 (0.0) 0.26
Streptococcus (other than S. pneumoniae) 40 (7.0) 20 (18.7) 20 (11.6) 0.46
G+B 1 1 0  
Ochrobactrum Anthropic 1 (0.17) 1 0 0.26
Anaerobic bacteria 0 (0.0) 0 0
Fungus 2 0 2  
Candida glabrata 2 (0.3) 0 2 0.21

These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES