Abstract
Extracellular matrix production and accumulation stabilize the heart under normal conditions as well as form a protective scar after myocardial infarction injury, although excessive extracellular matrix accumulation with long-standing heart disease is pathological. In the current study we investigate the role of the matricellular protein, transforming growth factor beta-induced (TGFBI), which is induced in various forms of heart disease. Additionally, we sought to understand whether TGFBI is functionally redundant to its closely related family member periostin, which is also induced in the diseased heart. Surgical models of myocardial infarction and cardiac pressure overload were used in mice with genetic loss of Postn and/or Tgfbi to examine the roles of these genes during the fibrotic response. Additionally, cardiac-specific TGFBI transgenic mice were generated and analyzed. We observed that deletion of Tgfbi did not alter cardiac disease after myocardial infarction in contrast to greater ventricular wall rupture in Postn gene-deleted mice. Moreover, Tgfbi and Postn double gene-deleted mice showed a similar post-myocardial infarction disease phenotype as Postn-deleted mice. Over-expression of TGFBI in the hearts of mice had a similar effect as previously shown in mice with periostin over-expression. Thus, TGFBI and periostin act similarly in the heart in affecting fibrosis and disease responsiveness, although TGFBI is not seemingly necessary in the heart after myocardial infarction injury and is fully compensated by the more prominently expressed effector periostin.
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States affecting more than 85 million people at an estimated annual cost of more than $300 billion [1]. A wide array of cardiovascular disease etiologies often culminate in heart failure, which is characterized by progressive cardiomyocyte cell death and the accumulation of excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) with adverse ventricular remodeling [2, 3]. However, ECM deposition after acute myocardial infarction (MI) injury is critical in facilitating scar formation to protect the ventricular wall from rupture. In longstanding chronic heart disease states, excess deposition of ECM leads to decreased ventricular wall compliance with reduced function [2]. Current therapeutics that specifically target excessive fibrosis and ECM production in chronic heart failure are lacking but desperately needed. Hence, it remains critical to understand the underlying mechanisms and associated genes whereby ECM accumulates in the heart during chronic disease states.
Transforming growth factor beta-induced (TGFBI) is a 68 kDa matricellular protein and a member of the fasciclin domain containing protein family that also includes periostin [4]. As a secreted protein that resides within the ECM, TGFBI affects cell migration and proliferation in models of cancer [5–9]. TGFBI shares substantial amino acid sequence similarity with periostin and a highly conserved protein domain structure [10]. Both TGFBI and periostin are evolutionarily conserved with a single paralog being present in Drosophila, suggesting that such proteins play an important role in biology [11]. Several studies have demonstrated the importance of periostin in facilitating collagen maturation and matrix production with proper scar formation in the hearts of mice after MI injury [12, 13]. In addition to facilitating collagen organization and cross-linking, periostin can interact with fibronectin and tenascin-C in generating additional ECM structural capacity [14]. Characterization of TGFBI in disease has primarily focused on corneal dystrophy where human mutations in the gene encoding this protein cause aberrant folding leading to TGFBI aggregation in the cornea resulting in blindness [15–17]. Tgfbi null mice showed morphologically altered lungs from prior aberrant developmental maturation as well as augmented myofibroblast numbers throughout this organ [18].
Given the significant similarity between periostin and TGFBI, we hypothesized that these proteins may have overlapping functions during cardiac ventricular remodeling. Previous studies have shown that periostin is robustly increased after injury in the heart and is required for adequate scar formation after MI [12, 13, 19, 20]. TGFBI mRNA is also induced in the injured heart [21], although, there have been no functional studies specifically addressing the role of this protein in the heart.
Materials and methods
Mice
Mice with genetic deletion of Postn and Tgfbi were previously described and were maintained as a mixed C57Bl/6-Sv129 background [12, 18]. To generate transgenic mice over-expressing TGFBI, the human TGFBI cDNA was cloned downstream of a modified tetracycline inducible α-myosin heavy chain (MHC) promoter construct, which was injected into newly fertilized mouse oocytes in the FVB/N background [22]. This allowed for the tetracycline/doxycycline inducible expression of TGFBI specifically in the heart when crossed with transgenic mice expressing the tet-transactivator (tTA) protein, also driven by the α-MHC promoter [22]. Primers used for genotyping were 5’-AAGTCTCTCCAAGGTGACAAGC-3’ and 5’-AGAAGGACACCTAGTCAGAC-3’ for the TGFBI transgene and 5’-AGCGCATTAGAGCTGCTTAATGAGGTC-3’ and 5’-GTCGTAATAATGGCGGCATACTATC-3’ for the tet-transactivator transgene.
Animal husbandry and ethics statement
Mice were housed in standard barrier rack cages supplied with Purina Rodent Chow 5001 with automatic watering dispensers. Cages were observed daily and were changed weekly by certified veterinary technicians at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Mice were also closely assessed for their well-being monitored by adequate physical activity and food intake on a daily basis. Housing conditions and husbandry conformed to AAALAC standards and the institution's ongoing certification by this organization, as well as by the standard guidelines from the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/animal_use.htm). All animal experimentation, including this specific study, was approved by the Office of Research Compliance and Regulatory Affairs and by the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Number: IACUC 2016–0069, expires 11–2019). No human subjects were used.
Echocardiography and surgical models of MI and TAC
Echocardiographic measurements were performed under 2.0% isoflurane anesthesia using a Hewlett Packard SONOS 5500 instrument [12]. Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) surgery as a model of cardiac pressure overload was performed in 8–12 week-old mice and cardiac functional characteristics were monitored with M-mode echocardiography every 2 weeks until the experiment was completed 12 weeks later [12, 23]. The TAC procedure was performed under 2% isoflurane-induced anesthesia. TAC operated mice were monitored daily by veterinary technicians for signs of distress and heart failure including lethargy, difficulty breathing and decreased physical activity. When any of these metrics differed substantially between sham and TAC operated animals, treatments including analgesic, IV fluids and soft diet were administered. Mice were under the care of a veterinarian and were monitored for improvement. If there was no improvement in symptoms after 24 hours, the mice were sacrificed. For MI surgery, the left coronary artery of 6–8 week-old mice was permanently occluded and M-mode echocardiography was used to monitor cardiac functional characteristic at 1, 3, 5 and 8 weeks post-surgery [12, 23]. For the MI procedure, 2% isoflurane-induced anesthesia was given to the mice until sedated as assessed by toe pinch. At the end of all surgical procedures, mice were given the pain medicine buprenex at a final concentration of 0.03 mg/ml by veterinary technicians. Mice were then transferred to a 30°C chamber and closely monitored to allow overnight recovery. The next day, mice were transferred back to standard housing and again monitored daily by veterinary technicians. Equal ratios of male and female mice were used in all experiments and procedures. At the end of the 8 week experiment, mice were anesthetized with 2.0% isoflurane until fully sedated before sacrifice. The mice were then cervically dislocated and the hearts were injected with 1 M KCl to arrest them in diastole. Hearts were either fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histological analysis or flash frozen for protein analysis.
Survival study
Mice were assessed daily by AAALAC certified veterinary technicians at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center for health and well-being including physical activity and food and water intake. Complications associated with surgical intervention were also monitored including lethargy and signs of heart failure. Mice were under veterinarian care to manage any signs of distress and provided with analgesics as needed or IV fluids with a special soft diet to accommodate recovery from surgical procedures. CCHMC’s IACUC committee has reviewed and approved the experiments for this study including anticipated mortality rates due to both surgical complications and study related events. Survival was monitored for 1 week after MI surgery in which mice died abruptly from ventricular wall rupture. To produce statistically meaningful numbers of mice that survived the 8 week experiment, a total of 147 mice were used for MI surgery (WT = 56 (26), Tgfbi-/- = 45 (24), Postn-/- = 23 (17) and DKO = 23 (19)) with the number of mice that died included in parentheses. All mice that died were necropsied to assess cardiac ventricular wall rupture as a cause of death. Mouse experimentation to assess cardiac rupture was required due to the lack of in vitro models of this process.
Model of acute lung injury
Lung injury in mice was induced by intranasal administration of 0.05 U of bleomycin (Teva Pharmaceuticals, NDC# 00703-3154-01), a well-known inducer of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [24–26], once a week for three weeks under 2.0% isoflurane anesthesia. Lungs were harvested one week after the final treatment and flash frozen before processing for protein analysis. No pain relief was deemed necessary for this procedure given the need to induce a fibrotic response in the lungs and because the procedure does not elicit a noticeable pain response in the mice.
Cell isolation and Western blotting
Adult cardiomyocytes were isolated from 8-week old wildtype (WT) mice as previously described [27, 28]. Briefly, beating hearts were removed from anesthetized mice (as described above) and cannulated for perfusion with modified Tyrode solution (120 mL NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM NaH2PO4, 5.6 mM glucose, 20 mM NaHCO3, 1.6 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM) and 5 mM taurine; buffer A). Hearts were then perfused with buffer A containing liberase blendzyme (Roche, cat# 05401151001) at 37°C. After perfusion, atria were excised and hearts were dissociated into individual cardiomyocytes, filtered and allowed to settle by gravity. The supernatant was then removed and the cardiomyocytes were re-suspended in a modified RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 4% glycerol, 0.5 mM sodium metabisulfite, 1% triton X-100, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.05% SDS) containing 1x phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 1 and 2 (Millipore, cat# 524624 and 524625), 1 mM DTT and 1x protease inhibitors (Fisher Scientific, cat# 88666) and sonicated (Bioruptor UCD-200) [29].
Adult cardiac fibroblasts were isolated according to protocol 2 of Pinto et al. [30]. Briefly, hearts were isolated from 8-week old WT mice and minced into 12 to 14 pieces in 1x Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, HyClone, cat# SH30588.01). The heart pieces were transferred to a digestion solution (1x HBSS, 2 mg/mL collagenase type IV (Worthington, Cat# LS004188), 1.2 U/mL dispase II (Roche, Cat# 10165859001), and 0.9 mM CaCl2) and incubated at 37°C for 15 min with gentle rocking. The digestion mix was triturated 12 times using a 10 mL serological pipette and placed back in the incubator. The trituration was repeated two more times for a total digestion period of 45 min and the final trituration was performed with a p1000 pipetteman (Gilson, p1000) [30]. The digestion was transferred to a 15 mL conical tube with 5 mL of culture media containing DMEM (Thermoscientific, cat# SH30284.02) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma, Cat# F2442), and 1% Pen/Strep (Fisher Scientific Cat# 30-002Cl). The cells were pelleted at 1000 x g for 5 minutes at room temperature. Following aspiration of the supernatant, the pellet was re-suspended in 10 mL of culture medium and plated on a 10 cm tissue culture dish coated with 0.1% gelatin. Cells were harvested at passage one, scraped with modified RIPA buffer (see above), and sonicated (Bioruptor UCD-200) for 5 minutes in an ice water bath.
Mouse hearts were removed 1 day, 1 week or 2 weeks after MI injury and the area of infarction was dissected to generate protein extracts. The tissue was homogenized in modified RIPA buffer, sonicated for 5 min, centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 x g at 4°C and the supernatant was used for Western analysis. Protein concentrations were quantified using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad, Cat#500–0006) according to manufacturer's instructions and then run on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel for Western blotting. Primary antibodies for periostin (Novus, 1:1000, Cat#NBP1-30042), TGFBI (Protein Tech (Cat #10188-1-AP or Abcam (Cat# AB170874), 1:1000), sarcomeric α-actin (Abcam (Cat# AB62298), 1:1000), and GAPDH (Fitzgerald (Cat# 10R-G109A), 1:5000) were used for protein detection. Secondary antibodies (LI-COR biosciences (Cat# 926–32211), 1:10,000) were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature prior to imaging on an Odyssey CLx LI-COR scanner [31]. Densitometry was performed for Western blot quantification using Image Studio software version 3.1.
RNA and QPCR
RNA was isolated from MI- or sham-operated hearts 1 week after surgery and either flash-frozen or stored in RNAlater (Ambion, Cat# AM7021) as previously described [31]. Briefly, hearts were weighed and 1 mL of Trizol (Invitrogen, Cat#15596–026) was added per 50 mg of tissue. Hearts were homogenized and RNA was isolated according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Cat#15596–026). The RNA was then run through an RNeasy column (Qiagen, Cat# 74104) including the optional column used with DNase digestion. Four micrograms of RNA were used as a template for cDNA synthesis using the Superscript III first strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Cat# 18080–051) according to manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative real time PCR (QPCR) was performed with 2 μL of this first strand cDNA mix diluted 1 to 10 using the SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Cat# 172–5275). QPCR was run on a Bio-Rad CFX96 C1000 real time Thermo Cycler. Primers used for TGFBI are forward 5’-AGATCTGGCAGTCATAGCTTGGCA-3’ and reverse 5’- TGTGAGCTCCAAGATGCCGTAGTT-3’. Primers for periostin are forward 5’–CAAAGCACACAGTTACCTTTCCAGGG– 3’ and reverse 5’–GCAGGAAACCCACATTGCATGAGA– 3’. Primers used for 18s rRNA (control) are forward 5’- GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3’ and reverse 5’- CCATCCAATCGGTAGTGACG -3’.
Immunohistochemistry and histology
Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed on formalin fixed 5–6 μm thick paraffin sections, which were then stained with Masson’s trichrome and imaged at 100x or 200x magnification. Fibrosis was quantified from Masson’s trichrome-stained sections using Image J software and graphed as percent fibrotic area [29].
Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously and the following primary antibodies were used: periostin (Abcam (Cat# AB92460), 1:100), TGFBI (Abcam, 1:100), and α-actinin (Sigma (Cat# A7811), 1:400) [29]. Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies were used at a concentration of 1:200 through 1:400 (Cat# A11031, and A11008). Pictures were taken using confocal microscopy (Nikon A1 Confocal). Cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area was measured on 200x images stained with wheat germ agglutinin-Alexa Fluor 647 Conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific (Cat# W32466), 1:200), laminin (Sigma (Cat# L9393), 1:50) and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI, Invitrogen (D1306), 1:5000). Cardiomyocytes with a visible central nucleus were used to measure cross sectional area using Image J software. Centrally nucleated cardiomyocytes were measured across three fields of each heart.
Statistical analysis
All results are represented as mean ± SEM. Unpaired Students t-test was performed to compare means between two groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used to compare means between multiple groups of the four gene-deleted mouse lines used with surgical intervention, The log rank Mantel-Cox test was used to compare survival curves between groups of mice after surgical intervention. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
TGFBI expression is increased in the heart after injury
Periostin expression is induced in a wide array of tissues following injury, and this induction of expression appears to be specific to the tissue resident, activated fibroblast [12, 19, 20]. The closely related family member TGFBI is also induced in areas of injury or cancers of the colon [9], ovary [6], lung [8], breast [7] and within the injured heart [20]. Here we show that similar to periostin [12], TGFBI induction is largely specific to the fibroblast, but not the cardiomyocyte, as assessed by Western blotting of protein extracts from isolated cells from this organ (Fig 1A). Tgfbi mRNA levels were also increased in the heart 7 days post-MI injury compared to sham-operated mice, although Postn mRNA levels were induced at substantially higher levels (Fig 1B). The infarct areas of the mouse heart were also isolated after 24 hours, 7 days and 14 days for Western analysis and comparison between periostin and TGFBI expression. The results show no expression in the sham-operated heart or 24 hours after MI injury, but a similar profile of induction at both 7 and 14 days after MI with periostin induction being more prominent (Fig 1C). Consistent with previous data, periostin localized to the peri-infarct area of hearts after 7days of MI and was deposited within the ECM region around the myocytes (Fig 1D) [12]. TGFBI was also localized to the infarct area of the heart 1 week after MI in a similar ECM-staining pattern (Fig 1D). Both gene products also showed substantial deposition around cardiac vessels (Fig 1D), especially after pressure overload stimulation as assayed by immunohistochemistry (S1 Fig).
Cardiac phenotype of Tgfbi null mice with MI injury
Mice genetically engineered for global deletion of Tgfbi [18] were used to examine how induction of this protein following cardiac injury might functionally impact the heart. By comparison, Postn-/- mice were previously shown to have greater lethality following MI injury due to inadequate scar formation and subsequent ventricular wall rupture [12, 13, 32]. However, here we observed that Tgfbi-/- mice had no change in overall survival rates following MI injury compared with WT control mice (Fig 2A). The 30–40% of mice that died in each group following MI injury showed no difference in the rates of underlying ventricular wall rupture. To also investigate the possibility that periostin expression might compensate for the loss of TGFBI during the MI healing period we first analyzed protein levels within the MI region of the heart for both periostin and TGFBI. Indeed, we observed an increase in TGFBI protein levels in the hearts of Postn-/- mice after MI compared with WT MI injured hearts, yet periostin protein levels where unchanged in the Tgfbi-/- hearts after MI compared with WT mice with MI (Fig 2B, 2C and 2D). These results suggest that periostin is the more dominant family member expressed in the heart, as only in its absence is the paralog gene Tgfbi induced beyond what was observed in WT hearts after injury. Interestingly, in the lung where TGFBI has been reported to play a critical developmental role [18], bleomycin injury significantly induced TGFBI expression while periostin expression was decreased (S2 Fig), suggesting a reciprocal compensation pattern in this tissue compared with the heart (which also reflects the dominance of TGFBI in lung over periostin).
Postn/Tgfbi double null mice (DKO) were also generated and examined to further address compensation or the possibility that one gene dominates over the other in the heart following MI injury. Importantly, adult DKO mice displayed no baseline phenotype or other observable cardiac pathology up to 1 year of age (S3 Fig). As previously observed by us [12], Postn-/- mice again showed greater lethality with higher rates of ventricular wall rupture following MI injury compared with WT controls (Fig 2E). However, separate groups of Tgfbi-/- mice again showed no greater lethality than WT MI injured mice, while DKO mice showed a profile of lethality and ventricular wall rupture nearly identical to Postn-/- mice, further suggesting that TGFBI protein induction is of little compensatory value during this injury response (Fig 2E). The same general reductions in cardiac ventricular fractional shortening or increases in left ventricular end diastolic dimension were detected between sham and MI operated groups of each genotype and were significantly changed by student T-test, but only some parameters were significant by ANOVA when all groups were compared together, and the later statistical results are shown in the figure as a conservative interpretation of the data (Fig 2F and 2G). However, the same trends were observed.
Cardiac phenotype of Tgfbi null mice with TAC surgery
To further analyze the role of TGFBI during cardiac injury, mice were subjected to long-term pressure overload stimulation by TAC, which induces a fibrotic response and reduces cardiac functional performance. After 12 weeks of TAC all genotypes of mice showed reductions in ventricular fractional shortening (Fig 3A), increases in heart-weight normalized to body-weight (Fig 3B), increases in the cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes in the left ventricle (Fig 3C) and a roughly similar increase in total ventricular fibrosis (Fig 3E and 3F). Interpretation of statistical significance behind these results was based on ANOVA, although comparison by student T-test between the WT group and any specific genotype showed a significant difference. However, Postn-/- and Tgfbi-/- mice even by ANOVA showed less pulmonary congestion after 12 weeks of TAC compared with WT controls or the DKO mice (Fig 3D). Pulmonary congestion is often used as an indicator of heart failure. We also observed that Tgfbi-/- mice displayed a decrease in hypertrophy following 12 weeks of TAC compared with all the other genotypes of mice by any statistical test (Fig 3B), although we are uncertain as to why this might be the case. Importantly, there were no differences between the genotypes in pressure gradients across the aortic constrictions. In summary, the data suggest that loss of Tgfbi or the loss of both Tgfbi together with Postn (DKO mice) does not appreciably worsen the cardiac phenotype of mice following pressure overload stimulation.
Heart specific over-expression of TGFBI
We previously showed that periostin over-expression in the heart using a transgene approach resulted in a mild but significant degree of cardiac hypertrophy by 32 weeks of age compared with WT controls, although over-expression of this protein was otherwise innocuous to the heart and did not increase fibrosis [12]. Here we generated transgenic mice with inducible over-expression of TGFBI under control of the α-MHC binary tetracycline transactivator (tTA) regulated system to determine how this protein might impact the heart (Fig 4A) [22]. Western analysis showed robust over-expression of TGFBI in the heart in the double transgenic mice (DTG) (Fig 4B). Immunohistochemical analysis of hearts from these DTG mice showed accumulation of secreted TGFBI protein within the ECM between the cardiomyocytes of the adult heart similar to its deposition when normally secreted by stress-activated fibroblasts (Fig 4C). TGFBI DTG mice also displayed a mild phenotype of concentric cardiac hypertrophy with aging (Fig 4D) that was also associated with an increase in ventricular fractional shortening (Fig 4E), but without a change in left ventricular end diastolic dimension or fibrosis (Fig 4F and 4G). Following long-term TAC, TGFBI DTG mice showed the same decrease in ventricular fractional shortening, increases in heart-weight normalized to body-weight, and increases in lung-weight normalized to body-weight as WT controls with TAC (Fig 4H, 4I and 4J). Together these data suggest that over-expression of TGFBI acts similar to previous results with periostin over-expression [12], in that it appears to support a greater cardiac growth response at baseline without impacting fibrosis or the ability of these hearts to compensate to long-term pressure overload.
Discussion
Periostin is a matricellular protein that is induced and secreted specifically by activated fibroblasts in areas of tissue injury where it accumulates within the ECM to facilitate type 1 collagen maturation and crosslinking, as well as strengthening of the ECM by interactions with tenascin-C, fibronectin and collagen V [33–35]. TGFBI and periostin are family members that contain 4 fasciclin domains with conserved sequence similarity. Similar to periostin, TGFBI is also induced by transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling in areas of tissue injury and is secreted by activated fibroblasts [4, 36]. While both Postn and Tgfbi gene expression are induced by injury events in nearly all tissues evaluated, Postn induction has been most heavily evaluated in the heart following injury or in cancer cells as they undergo invasion with ECM remodeling [12] [37–39]. Previous work from us and others has shown that periostin is required for proper scar formation in the heart after MI injury, such that mice deficient in this gene undergo lethal rupture [12, 13]. This event was shown to be specific to the cardiac fibroblast as targeted ablation of periostin-expressing fibroblasts prevented adverse remodeling in mice after MI injury or angiotensin II infusion [32]. We also showed that deletion of periostin-expressing activated fibroblasts from the heart during MI injury compromised scar formation and results in lethal ventricular wall rupture [40].
To date, the majority of the literature pertaining to TGFBI has focused on corneal dystrophy. TGFBI is a primary disease-causing gene associated with corneal dystrophy where mutations cause protein deposits on the cornea eventually leading to blindness [15, 16]. Tgfbi null mice were also recently shown to have a pathological lung phenotype as discussed earlier [18]. While a single description of Tgfbi mRNA induction in the diseased heart from an extensive array profiling study of the mouse heart was reported [21], almost nothing is known of TGFBI function in the heart. Moreover, nothing was previously known of the potential for periostin and TGFBI to function redundantly or if each might possibly have unique roles in selective tissues based on where they are primarily expressed.
Here we observed that TGFBI is induced in the heart with injury, and that this expression is within fibroblasts. However, TGFBI expression and ECM deposition was noticeably less compared with periostin upon cardiac injury, as assessed by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. However, lung injury showed the opposite effect with a much greater induction of TGFBI compared to periostin, hence it is likely that differences in phenotypes and disease profiles between Postn and Tgfbi gene-deleted mice is a reflection of where each gene is primarily expressed across selective tissues. Indeed, this hypothesis is supported by previous work where periostin and TGFBI are reported to have opposite effects in the lung in mouse models of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [18, 41]. In response to hyperoxia, Postn null mice displayed normal alveolar development [41] while Tgfbi null mice at baseline showed alveolar defects [18].
In the heart, mice deficient for Postn attempted at compensate after MI injury by upregulation of Tgfbi expression. However, loss of the less highly expressed Tgfbi gene in the heart during MI injury did not result in greater induction of Postn expression, as periostin induction is presumably already more than sufficient. In support of this conclusion, Postn/Tgfbi double null mice showed the same degree of defective scar formation and ventricular wall rupture after MI as Postn single null mice, while single null Tgfbi mice were unaffected relative to WT.
To further address if TGFBI and periostin might function similarly in the mouse heart, apart from differences in expression levels, we engineered TGFBI transgenic mice with heart-specific expression. TGFBI over-expression, which was deposited within the ECM, induced a mild degree of concentric cardiac hypertrophy reminiscent of a nearly identical increase of baseline cardiac hypertrophy observed in periostin heart-specific over-expressing mice at 32 weeks of age [12]. Neither periostin nor TGFBI over-expression was sufficient to induce a fibrotic response or otherwise impact pressure overload induced fibrosis. These results suggest that periostin and TGFBI have similar function at the protein level; further suggesting that differences in the disease susceptibility phenotype observed between mice lacking either gene is a reflection of expression dominance in the heart. In the future it would be interesting to insert the TGFBI cDNA into to Postn locus and create homozygous targeted mice, which if our hypothesis is correct, such mice lacking periostin protein would be fully compensated by TGFBI protein induction from the Postn locus because it drives much higher expression in cardiac fibroblasts with injury events.
Finally, while periostin and TGFBI are highly similar through their 4 fasciclin domains [42], periostin uniquely contains a C-terminal region that is alternatively spliced [42–44], which when cleaved can presumably contribute to alterations in protein function [14, 34, 38]. In fact, it has been shown that periostin binding to tenascin-C, fibronectin and collagen V is enhanced upon loss of the C-terminal tail [33, 35]. These data suggest that the dynamic C-terminal tail of periostin, which is lacking in TGFBI, may give this family member unique functional characteristics. More studies are clearly needed to further dissect the functional similarities and differences between these two related family members in the heart and other tissues.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
NIH grants to JDM include: R01HL105924 and P01HL69779. NIH grants to SJC include: R01HL115619.
References
- 1.Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–e603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fan D, Takawale A, Lee J, Kassiri Z. Cardiac fibroblasts, fibrosis and extracellular matrix remodeling in heart disease. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2012;5(1):15 doi: 10.1186/1755-1536-5-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xie M, Burchfield JS, Hill JA. Pathological ventricular remodeling: therapies: part 2 of 2. Circulation. 2013;128(9):1021–30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Skonier J, Neubauer M, Madisen L, Bennett K, Plowman GD, Purchio AF. cDNA cloning and sequence analysis of beta ig-h3, a novel gene induced in a human adenocarcinoma cell line after treatment with transforming growth factor-beta. DNA Cell Biol. 1992;11(7):511–22. doi: 10.1089/dna.1992.11.511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thapa N, Lee BH, Kim IS. TGFBIp/betaig-h3 protein: a versatile matrix molecule induced by TGF-beta. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(12):2183–94. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ahmed AA, Mills AD, Ibrahim AE, Temple J, Blenkiron C, Vias M, et al. The extracellular matrix protein TGFBI induces microtubule stabilization and sensitizes ovarian cancers to paclitaxel. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(6):514–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Calaf GM, Echiburu-Chau C, Zhao YL, Hei TK. BigH3 protein expression as a marker for breast cancer. Int J Mol Med. 2008;21(5):561–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pajares MJ, Agorreta J, Salvo E, Behrens C, Wistuba II, Montuenga LM, et al. TGFBI expression is an independent predictor of survival in adjuvant-treated lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(6):1545–51. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhu J, Chen X, Liao Z, He C, Hu X. TGFBI protein high expression predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(1):702–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Litvin J, Zhu S, Norris R, Markwald R. Periostin family of proteins: therapeutic targets for heart disease. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2005;287(2):1205–12. doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mosher DF, Johansson MW, Gillis ME, Annis DS. Periostin and TGF-beta-induced protein: Two peas in a pod? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;50(5):427–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oka T, Xu J, Kaiser RA, Melendez J, Hambleton M, Sargent MA, et al. Genetic manipulation of periostin expression reveals a role in cardiac hypertrophy and ventricular remodeling. Circ Res. 2007;101(3):313–21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.149047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shimazaki M, Nakamura K, Kii I, Kashima T, Amizuka N, Li M, et al. Periostin is essential for cardiac healing after acute myocardial infarction. J Exp Med. 2008;205(2):295–303. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kudo A. Periostin in fibrillogenesis for tissue regeneration: periostin actions inside and outside the cell. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68(19):3201–7. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0784-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kannabiran C, Klintworth GK. TGFBI gene mutations in corneal dystrophies. Hum Mutat. 2006;27(7):615–25. doi: 10.1002/humu.20334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Han KE, Choi SI, Kim TI, Maeng YS, Stulting RD, Ji YW, et al. Pathogenesis and treatments of TGFBI corneal dystrophies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;50:67–88. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim BY, Olzmann JA, Choi SI, Ahn SY, Kim TI, Cho HS, et al. Corneal dystrophy-associated R124H mutation disrupts TGFBI interaction with Periostin and causes mislocalization to the lysosome. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(29):19580–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ahlfeld SK, Wang J, Gao Y, Snider P, Conway SJ. Initial Suppression of Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling and Loss of TGFBI Causes Early Alveolar Structural Defects Resulting in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(4):777–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao S, Wu H, Xia W, Chen X, Zhu S, Zhang S, et al. Periostin expression is upregulated and associated with myocardial fibrosis in human failing hearts. J Cardiol. 2014;63(5):373–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guan J, Liu WQ, Xing MQ, Shi Y, Tan XY, Jiang CQ, et al. Elevated expression of periostin in diabetic cardiomyopathy and the effect of valsartan. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:90 doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0084-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee JH, Gao C, Peng G, Greer C, Ren S, Wang Y, et al. Analysis of transcriptome complexity through RNA sequencing in normal and failing murine hearts. Circ Res. 2011;109(12):1332–41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.249433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sanbe A, Gulick J, Hanks MC, Liang Q, Osinska H, Robbins J. Reengineering inducible cardiac-specific transgenesis with an attenuated myosin heavy chain promoter. Circ Res. 2003;92(6):609–16. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000065442.64694.9F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wilkins BJ, Dai YS, Bueno OF, Parsons SA, Xu J, Plank DM, et al. Calcineurin/NFAT coupling participates in pathological, but not physiological, cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2004;94(1):110–8. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000109415.17511.18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lawson WE, Polosukhin VV, Stathopoulos GT, Zoia O, Han W, Lane KB, et al. Increased and prolonged pulmonary fibrosis in surfactant protein C-deficient mice following intratracheal bleomycin. Am J Pathol. 2005;167(5):1267–77. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61214-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Limjunyawong N, Mitzner W, Horton MR. A mouse model of chronic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Physiol Rep. 2014;2(2):e00249 doi: 10.1002/phy2.249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moeller A, Ask K, Warburton D, Gauldie J, Kolb M. The bleomycin animal model: a useful tool to investigate treatment options for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(3):362–82. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Correll RN, Goonasekera SA, van Berlo JH, Burr AR, Accornero F, Zhang H, et al. STIM1 elevation in the heart results in aberrant Ca(2)(+) handling and cardiomyopathy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;87:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.07.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.van Berlo JH, Kanisicak O, Maillet M, Vagnozzi RJ, Karch J, Lin SC, et al. c-kit+ cells minimally contribute cardiomyocytes to the heart. Nature. 2014;509(7500):337–41. doi: 10.1038/nature13309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lorts A, Schwanekamp JA, Baudino TA, McNally EM, Molkentin JD. Deletion of periostin reduces muscular dystrophy and fibrosis in mice by modulating the transforming growth factor-beta pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(27):10978–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204708109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pinto AR, Ilinykh A, Ivey MJ, Kuwabara JT, D'Antoni ML, Debuque R, et al. Revisiting Cardiac Cellular Composition. Circ Res. 2016;118(3):400–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schwanekamp JA, Lorts A, Vagnozzi RJ, Vanhoutte D, Molkentin JD. Deletion of Periostin Protects Against Atherosclerosis in Mice by Altering Inflammation and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(1):60–8. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaur H, Takefuji M, Ngai CY, Carvalho J, Bayer J, Wietelmann A, et al. Targeted Ablation of Periostin-Expressing Activated Fibroblasts Prevents Adverse Cardiac Remodeling in Mice. Circ Res. 2016;118(12):1906–17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kii I, Nishiyama T, Li M, Matsumoto K, Saito M, Amizuka N, et al. Incorporation of tenascin-C into the extracellular matrix by periostin underlies an extracellular meshwork architecture. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(3):2028–39. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.051961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Norris RA, Damon B, Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Ramamurthi A, Moreno-Rodriguez R, et al. Periostin regulates collagen fibrillogenesis and the biomechanical properties of connective tissues. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101(3):695–711. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Takayama G, Arima K, Kanaji T, Toda S, Tanaka H, Shoji S, et al. Periostin: a novel component of subepithelial fibrosis of bronchial asthma downstream of IL-4 and IL-13 signals. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;118(1):98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Holmberg C, Quante M, Steele I, Kumar JD, Balabanova S, Duval C, et al. Release of TGFbetaig-h3 by gastric myofibroblasts slows tumor growth and is decreased with cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(8):1553–62. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu AY, Zheng H, Ouyang G. Periostin, a multifunctional matricellular protein in inflammatory and tumor microenvironments. Matrix Biol. 2014;37:150–6. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Morra L, Moch H. Periostin expression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: a review and an update. Virchows Arch. 2011;459(5):465–75. doi: 10.1007/s00428-011-1151-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Conway SJ, Izuhara K, Kudo Y, Litvin J, Markwald R, Ouyang G, et al. The role of periostin in tissue remodeling across health and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71(7):1279–88. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1494-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kanisicak O, Khalil H, Ivey MJ, Karch J, Maliken BD, Correll RN, et al. Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12260 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bozyk PD, Bentley JK, Popova AP, Anyanwu AC, Linn MD, Goldsmith AM, et al. Neonatal periostin knockout mice are protected from hyperoxia-induced alveolar simplication. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31336 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hoersch S, Andrade-Navarro MA. Periostin shows increased evolutionary plasticity in its alternatively spliced region. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:30 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Horiuchi K, Amizuka N, Takeshita S, Takamatsu H, Katsuura M, Ozawa H, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel protein, periostin, with restricted expression to periosteum and periodontal ligament and increased expression by transforming growth factor beta. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14(7):1239–49. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Takeshita S, Kikuno R, Tezuka K, Amann E. Osteoblast-specific factor 2: cloning of a putative bone adhesion protein with homology with the insect protein fasciclin I. Biochem J. 1993;294 (Pt 1):271–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.