Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Jul 27;5(30):e00744-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00744-17

Draft Genome Sequences of Saccharibacter sp. Strains 3.A.1 and M18 Isolated from Honey and a Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Stomach

Alexandra Veress 1, Tímea Wilk 1, János Kiss 1, Ferenc Olasz 1,, Péter P Papp 1,
PMCID: PMC5532846  PMID: 28751408

ABSTRACT

The annotated draft genome sequences of two recent Saccharibacter sp. strains isolated from honey and a honey bee stomach in 2014 are reported here. Currently, two Saccharibacter whole-genome sequences are available in databases; thus, the sequences of our new isolates will contribute to a better understanding of Saccharibacter genomes.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Saccharibacter species (Acetobacteraceae) are aerobic Gram-negative bacteria that often occur in sugar-rich environments, for instance, in the gut of sugar-feeding insects (14), and they are suggested to be symbionts of insects. Despite the possible importance of these species, only limited information is available about their genome organization. Surprisingly, only two Saccharibacter genome sequences can be found in databases to date (Saccharibacter sp. strain AM169, accession number CBLY01 [1], and Saccharibacter floricola DSM15669, accession number ARJS01 [5]). Here, we report draft genome sequences of Saccharibacter sp. strain 3.A.1 isolated from honey and Saccharibacter sp. strain M18 isolated from a honey bee (Apis mellifera) stomach. The samples were derived from different apiaries located in the central region of Hungary.

In order to investigate the genomes of Saccharibacter sp. strains 3.A.1 and M18, total DNA was isolated, and 600- to 630-bp fragment libraries were prepared by UD GenoMED (Debrecen, Hungary). The 2 × 300-bp Illumina paired-end genome sequencing was performed by the University of Szeged, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Szeged, Hungary) as a custom service using Illumina’s MiSeq platform. The numbers of reads were 810,000 for Saccharibacter sp. 3.A.1 and 3.1 million for Saccharibacter sp. M18. The estimated coverages of the whole genomes were 120× and 450×, respectively.

The reads were de novo assembled using A5-miseq (6). The total lengths of the chromosomal contigs for Saccharibacter sp. 3.A.1 and M18 were 2,023,510 and 2,086,874 bp, and their GC contents were 49.15% and 52.73%, respectively. The assembled genome sequences were annotated using the RAST annotation server (7). We set the genetic code to 11 (Archaea, Bacteria). In the whole genomes of Saccharibacter sp. strains 3.A.1 and M18, 1,913 and 2,001 annotated genes, 100 and 102 tRNAs, and 13 and 15 rRNAs were identified, respectively.

Pairwise comparison (8) of the sequences revealed a striking similarity (98.69%) between the two strains. The genome sequence of Saccharibacter sp. 3.A.1 proved to be almost identical (99.24%) to that of Saccharibacter sp. AM169 and 77.20% similar to that of S. floricola DSM15669, while Saccharibacter sp. M18 showed 98.72% and 77.81% similarity to those strains, respectively.

The draft sequence of Saccharibacter sp. M18 contains additional scaffolds that cannot be aligned to that of Saccharibacter sp. 3.A.1. Further analysis of these scaffolds revealed the presence of 13,145-bp and a 7,488-bp plasmids in Saccharibacter sp. M18 without significant sequence homology to hitherto-known plasmids.

The 16S rRNA gene sequences previously suggested that strains 3.A.1 and M18 can be classified as Saccharibacter spp., which was confirmed by the analyses of six further genes (gyrA, gyrB, dnaJ, recA, rnaP, and groEL). Our draft genome sequences may offer better insight into the origin and evolution of this lesser-known group of bacteria.

Accession number(s).

The draft genome sequences of Saccharibacter sp. strains 3.A.1 and M18 genomes have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers MNPT00000000 and MNPS00000000, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by the Hungarian Research Found OTKA K105635 to János Kiss.

Footnotes

Citation Veress A, Wilk T, Kiss J, Olasz F, Papp PP. 2017. Draft genome sequences of Saccharibacter sp. strains 3.A.1 and M18 isolated from honey and a honey bee (Apis mellifera) stomach. Genome Announc 5:e00744-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00744-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chouaia B, Gaiarsa S, Crotti E, Comandatore F, Degli Esposti M, Ricci I, Alma A, Favia G, Bandi C, Daffonchio D. 2014. Acetic acid bacteria genomes reveal functional traits for adaptation to life in insect guts. Genome Biol Evol 6:912–920. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crotti E, Rizzi A, Chouaia B, Ricci I, Favia G, Alma A, Sacchi L, Bourtzis K, Mandrioli M, Cherif A, Bandi C, Daffonchio D. 2010. Acetic acid bacteria, newly emerging symbionts of insects. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6963–6970. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01336-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li L, Praet J, Borremans W, Nunes OC, Manaia CM, Cleenwerck I, Meeus I, Smagghe G, De Vuyst L, Vandamme P. 2015. Bombella intestini gen. nov., sp. nov., an acetic acid bacterium isolated from bumble bee crop. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:267–273. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.068049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saraithong P, Li Y, Saenphet K, Chen Z, Chantawannakul P. 2015. Bacterial community structure in Apis florea larvae analyzed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Insect Sci 22:606–618. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jojima Y, Mihara Y, Suzuki S, Yokozeki K, Yamanaka S, Fudou R. 2004. Saccharibacter floricola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel osmophilic acetic acid bacterium isolated from pollen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:2263–2267. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02911-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. 2015. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 31:587–589. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES