Skip to main content
Molecular Biology Research Communications logoLink to Molecular Biology Research Communications
. 2017 Jun;6(2):77–84.

Gene variants of CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; outcome of a case control study from Kashmir, India

Sadiq Nida 1,*, Bhat Javid 2, Masood Akbar 1, Shah Idrees 1, Wani Adil 1, Ganai Bashir Ahmad 3
PMCID: PMC5534522  PMID: 28775993

Abstract

Studies on associations of various polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing genes with different cancers including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) are mixed and inconclusive. The current study analyzed the relationship between polymorphisms of phase I xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, cytochromes P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and CYP2D6 and childhood ALL in Kashmir, India. We recruited 200 confirmed ALL cases, and an equal number of controls, matched for sex, age and district of residence to the respective case. Information was obtained on various lifestyle and environmental factors in face to face interviews with the parents/attendants of each subject. Genotypes of CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Compared to the GG genotype, we found a higher ALL risk in subjects who harbored variant (AA) genotype (OR=20.9; 95% CI: 6.01-73.1, P<0.0001) and AG genotype (OR=42.6; 95% CI: 8.3-217.5, P<0.0001) of CYP2D6*4 polymorphism. Although, we found a significant association of CYP1A1*2A polymorphism with ALL risk, but the risk did not persist in the adjusted model (OR=6.76; 95% CI: 0.63–71.8, P=0.100). The study indicates that unlike CYP1A1*2A, CYP2D6*4 polymorphism is associated with ALL risk. However, more replicative studies with larger sample size are needed to substantiate our findings.

Key Words: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia, Polymorphism, Kashmir, Xenobiotics

INTRODUCTION

Genetic susceptibility and environmental exposures play roles in the etiology of leukemia [1]. Environmental exposures like ionizing radiation, benzene, and cytotoxic therapy are some of the proposed causes of acute leukemia and for genetic susceptibility, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) the most common type that consists of a variation at a single base pair. Depending on where it is located, SNPs can interfere with a gene’s function, affecting metabolic pathways and thus affecting the course of the disease and its progress. SNPs in the xenobiotic system, cell regulation, and DNA repair system have been identified as risk factors in childhood leukemia [2, 3]. Therefore, functional polymorphisms in genes encoding carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes may have relevance in determining susceptibility to pediatric cancer [4].

All xenobiotics, including therapeutic agents, are metabolized and eliminated from the body by a system of enzymes encoded by specific genes. Most of these genes are polymorphic and some polymorphic forms have an altered enzyme activity [5]. As the cytochrome group represents the first line of defense against toxic chemicals, carcinogens and used drugs [6], the genetic variants in these xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes can significantly affect the susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [7]. For this reason, two genes of this cytochrome family CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 have gained much interest and many genetic variants have been reported in both the genes.

Kashmir valley located at a high altitude in the northern part of India, have preserved genetic pool mostly due to consanguineous marriages [8]. Owing to this factor and its geographical location Kashmiris show wide genetic diversity from the rest of India. There is no population-based tumor registry at this moment and the various studies relating to the epidemiologic facts of cancer in Kashmir are essentially hospital based. As per the recent study conducted by Muzaffar et al., [9] on pattern and profile of childhood malignancies in Kashmir showed that ALL is the leading childhood malignancy which accounts for ~37% of the total childhood malignant cases and reportedly child is exposed to a range of xenobiotics through maternal and paternal lifestyle habits. But the role of polymorphisms in genes involved in such xenobiotic metabolism, the interaction among them and with the environment is not yet studied in Kashmir. Therefore we conducted a case-control study in Kashmir to assess the risk of ALL associated with polymorphisms in CYP1A1 and CYP2D6.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects and data collection : This study included 200 newly diagnosed histopathological confirmed childhood ALL patients and 200 controls. ALL patients were diagnosed as per French–American-British (FAB) criteria [10, 11] in the Division of Clinical Haematology of Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), only tertiary care hospital in the whole Kashmir Valley located in Srinagar, the central city in Kashmir valley. This study was conducted between March 2012 and December 2015. The inclusion criteria for ALL cases were (1) Complete clinical history was available; (2) Patients below the age of 20 years (3) Subjects of Kashmir origin. All the controls were recruited from SKIMS and the criteria for inclusion in the control group were: (1) Kashmiri patients enrolled for minor ailments (like a hernia, urinary stones, diarrhoea, appendicitis, prostatitis, pancreatitis, fever workup, jaundice, biliary stones, trauma/accidents, infections, and fractures). (2) Age, gender, and district matched with respective ALL cases and (3) had no history of any malignancy. The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of SKIMS and informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals or parents involved in the study. Structured questionnaires were used to collect information on age, sex, place of residence, parental education, smoking; family history, monthly income and other possible confounding factors of interest in face to face interviews. No proxies were used in the study.

Collection of blood sample and genotyping : Two milliliters of venous blood was collected from each patient in EDTA coated plastic vial and stored at −80ºC before DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples by using the phenol-chloroform method [12]. The DNA extracted was quantified and stored at -20ºC until used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The CYP1A1*2A (rs4646903) and CYP2D6*4 (rs3892097) polymorphisms were determined as described previously [13, 14].

Statistical Analysis: Categorical variables were set for presenting and calculating numbers and percentages for different variants of CYP2D6 and CYP1A1. Conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the association of various polymorphisms of CYP2D6*4 and CYP1A1*2A with childhood ALL risk and to assess the possible gene–gene and gene–environment interactions. The adjustment was made for known risk factors like age, sex, residence, parental education level, monthly income, parental occupation, smoking, family history of cancer and in utero X-ray exposure during pregnancy. All statistical analysis was done using Stata software, version 12 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Two-sided P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Distribution of demographic factors, the wealth scores a socioeconomic indicator, paternal smoking, and allele frequency by case status are shown in Table 1. The majority of cases were ≤5 years of age and 60% were males. A number of ALL cases resided in rural areas than respective controls. Distribution of non-genetic factors in cases and controls including paternal smoking status around the period of conception (P=0.045), paternal occupation (P<0.001) and in utero X-ray exposure during pregnancy (P=0.045) was significantly different among cases and controls. However, no significant differences were observed between parental education (P=0.317), monthly income (P=0.230) and family history of cancer (P=0.527) among cases and controls.

Table 1.

Demographic characters of childhood ALL cases and controls

Variables Cases n (%) Controls n (%) P a
Age ≤5 110 (55.0) 110 (55.0) 1.000
6-10 60 (30.0) 60 (30.0)
>10 30 (15.0) 30 (15.0)
Gender Male 120 (60.0) 120 (60.0) 1.000
Female 80 (40.0) 80 (40.0)
Dwelling Urban 65 (32.5) 65 (32.5) 1.000
Rural 135 (67.5) 135 (67.5)
Paternal occupation Govt. employee 20 (10.0) 55 (27.5) <0.001
Business 28 (14.0) 45 (22.5)
Farmer 66 (33.0) 54 (27.0)
Labour 86 (43.0) 46 (23.0)
Paternal smoking Yes 115 (57.5) 95 (47.5) 0.045
No 85 (42.5) 105 (52.5)
Monthly income <10,000 108 (54.0) 96 (48.0) 0.230
>10000 92 (46.0) 104 (52.0)
Parental education Yes 95 (47.5) 105 (52.5) 0.317
No 105 (52.5) 95 (47.5)
In utero X-ray exposure during pregnancy Yes 105 (52.5) 85 (42.5) 0.045
No 95 (47.5) 115 (57.5)
Family history of cancer Yes 72 (36.0) 66 (33.0) 0.527
No 128 (64.0) 134 (67.0)
a

Chi- square test (χ2) was used to calculate P-values for categorical variables. n, number of individuals

Genotypic frequencies of both CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 in ALL cases and controls are summarized in Table 2. We found that both variant (CC) and heterozygous genotype (CT) of CYP1A1*2A polymorphism were associated with ALL risk, but this risk did not persist in the adjusted model (OR=6.76, P>0.100), when results were adjusted for potential confounders. Further, the association did not persist when CC and TT genotypes were grouped together in the adjusted model (OR=1.36, P=0.002).

Table 2.

Distribution of CYP1A1*2A and CYP2D6*4 genotypes among cases and controls and their interaction among themselves in modulating the risk of ALL in Kashmir, India

Variable Cases n (%) Controls n (%) Crude OR 1 (95% CI)2 Adj OR 3 (95% CI) 2 P
CYP1A1
TT 142 (71.0) 168 (84.0) 1.0 1.0 -
CT 53 (26.5) 31 (15.5) 2.14 (1.30 – 3.56) 1.32 (0.71 – 2.48) 0.005
CC 5 (2.5) 1 (0.5) 9.70 (1.07 – 87.83) 6.76 (0.63 – 71.88) 0.100
CC+TC 58 (29.0) 32 (16.0) 2.18 (1.32 – 3.61) 1.36 (0.73 – 2.53) 0.002
CYP2D6
GG 86 (43.0 190 (95.0) 1.0 1.0 -
AG 43 (21.5) 6 (3.0) 26.3 (6.54 – 105.5) 42.67 (8.37 – 217.5) <0.0001
AA 71 (35.5) 4 (2.0) 27.43 (8.73 – 86.14) 20.96 (6.01 – 73.13) <0.0001
AA+AG 114 (57.0) 10 (5.0) 27.0 (9.95 – 73.24) 27.73 (9.12 – 84.32) <0.0001
4 Gen- gene interaction between CYP1A1 and CYP2D6
(p interaction = 0.487 ; SE = 0.225)
TT+GG 61 (30.5) 162 (81.0) 1.0 1.0
CC+TC & GG 25 (12.5) 28 (14.0) 32.68 (10.49 – 101.8) 50.2 (12.57 – 200.7)
TT & (AA+AG) 81 (40.5) 6 (3.0) 2.02 (0.98 – 4.16) 1.24 (0.48 – 3.22)
CC+TC & AA+AG 33 (16.5) 4 (2.0) 26.40 (6.19 – 112.6) 8.81 (2.07 – 37.57)
1

OR=odds ratio.

2

CI=confidence interval

3

Adjusted ORs were obtained from conditional logistic regression models when adjusted for age, family history, parental education level, paternal occupation, place of residence, socioeconomic status and paternal smoking.

High risk of ALL was found in the AA (OR=20.9, P<0.0001) and AG genotypes of CYP2D6*4 (OR=42.6; P<0.0001) and the risk was retained when (AA) and (AG) carriers were grouped together (OR=27.7, P<0.0001). The magnitude of risk associated with AA, AG, and AG + AA was almost similar in the unadjusted model. Further, on analyzing any possible gene–gene interaction, we did not find any significant interactions between CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 (p interaction=0.487).

DISCUSSION

The present study determined the association of CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 polymorphisms with ALL risk in Kashmiri population. This population has relative genetic homogeneity [8] which makes it an ideal genetic model for carrying out such studies. We found that unlike CYP1A1*2A, CYP2D6*4 polymorphism is associated with ALL risk. CYP450s are heme-containing enzymes important to phase I-dependent metabolism of drugs and other xenobiotics [15]. Studies have persistently associated polymorphisms in these CYP genes with individual susceptibility to many cancers [16-20]. However, the role of such polymorphism in cancer development is not conclusive [21]. Despite much investigation, little is known about the mechanism of leukemogenesis. Polymorphism in CYP2D6 gene at position G1934A causes a disruption of the splice site at the intron3/exon4 boundary that leads to incorrect splicing of mRNA resulting in a frame shift and premature termination that generates a truncated protein [22]. These polymorphisms usually lead to no or reduced activity of the CYP2D6 protein, resulting in the poor metabolizer phenotype [23]. Previous studies that have assessed the role of CYP2D6 genetic variations in susceptibility to ALL have reported mixed results [24, 25]. In the current study, we found that CYP2D6*4 polymorphism is associated with ALL risk in Kashmir. A plausible explanation for our finding could be that as the CYP2D6 gene is involved in the detoxification of carcinogenic compounds and consequently due to the absence of enzymatic activity genotoxic metabolites gets accumulated in phase I detoxification process resulting in higher risk of ALL [24].

CYP1A1 gene is responsible for metabolic activation of pre-carcinogens [26]. Previous work revealed that the polymorphism of Msp I restriction site owing to a T-C variation in the 3’ non-coding region of the CYP1A1 allele is experimentally associated with increased catalytic activity and increase of the amount of DNA adducts in cord blood and placenta of newborns [27]. In the current study, we did not find any association of CYP1A1*2A with susceptibility to develop ALL. However, earlier reports have shown mixed results for this polymorphism and susceptibility to ALL. Studies have either reported the positive association of CYP1A1*2A polymorphism with ALL [14, 25] or no association [28]. This inconsistency in the results obtained in various studies could be attributed to the variable sample size, the heterogeneity of the populations and study design. Epidemiologic studies have propounded that in utero and postnatal exposures to various biological, chemical and physical factors may be important in determining the susceptibility to childhood ALL [29] and as such infants and children may be at greater risk for a variety of environmental toxicants than adults due to their physiologic immaturity and/or differential exposure [27]. Xenobiotics enter the placenta through the maternal circulation [30]. Placenta has the ability to metabolize these compounds through processes similar to those seen in the liver [31]. Therefore, alterations in the placental metabolism could modify the exposure of the developing fetus to harmful electrophiles.

After stratification of data, we found a significant association between paternal smoking with the risk of ALL (P=0.045). Stronger evidence is accumulating now for the role of paternal smoking as reported in several individual studies and meta-analyses of ALL [32, 33]. Whilst smoking clearly impacts DNA damage which is important in carcinogenesis and therefore may influence the risk of ALL [34]. Paternal exposure is of concern, due to possible germline effects for fathers and passive exposure of pregnant women due to cross placental transfer from mother to baby. In utero exposure to low-dose radiation delivered from medical X-rays is one of the few widely recognized risk factors for childhood leukemia [35] and hence the early life exposures to these radiations have been implicated in the etiology of childhood ALL [36]. The increased risk of ALL conferred by in utero X-ray exposure found in this study is in agreement with the recent study [37]. However, other reports did not support these results [38]. To our knowledge, this is the first investigation that attempted to study the impact of polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and CYP2D6 on the risk of childhood ALL in Kashmir valley. Besides this study assessed the role of certain non-genetic factors in the development of ALL as well. However further studies with larger sample size are warranted to replicate the findings.

Acknowledgment

The study was financially supported by research grant from Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India, under Women Scientist B (WOS-B) Societal Research Fellowship (SoRF) scheme via Letter No. DST/Disha/SoRF/PM/011/2013/C. We are highly obliged to all the subjects who participated in this study. We are also thankful to all the consultants and all the paramedical staff at SKIMS for their valuable help during subject recruitment and sample collection.

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Infante-Rivard C, Labuda D, Krajinovic M, Sinnett D. Risk of childhood leukemia associated with exposure to pesticides and with gene polymorphisms. Epidemiology. 1999;10:481–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perera FP. Molecular epidemiology: Insights into cancer susceptibility, risk assessment, and prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:496. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.8.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brisson GD, Alves LR, Pombo-de-Oliveira MS. Genetic susceptibility in childhood acute leukaemias: a systematic review. Ecancermedicalscience. 2015;9:539. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krajinovic M, Labuda D, Mathonnet G, Labuda M, Moghrabi A, Champagne J, Sinnett D. Polymorphisms in genes encoding drugs and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, DNA repair enzymes, and response to treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:802–810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gra OA, Kozhekbaeva ZM, Makarova OV, Samochatova EV, Nasedkina TV. Polymorphism of biotransformation genes and risk of relapse in childhood acute leukemia. Balkan J Med Genet. 2009;12:21–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rieder CRM, Ramsden DB, Williams AC. Cytochrome P450 1B1mRNA in the human central nervous system. Mol Pathol. 1998;51:138–142. doi: 10.1136/mp.51.3.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Krajinovic M, Labuda D, Sinnett D. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: genetic determinants of susceptibility and disease outcome. Rev Environ Health. 2001;16:263–279. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2001.16.4.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nazki FH, Masood A, Banday MA, Bhat A, Ganai BA. Thymidylate synthase enhancer region polymorphism not related to susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the Kashmir population. Genet Mol Res. 2012;11:906–917. doi: 10.4238/2012.April.10.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Muzaffar J, Shabir A, Ishrat R, Sheikh Q, Tariq R. Pattern and clinical profile of childhood malignancies in Kashmir India. JK- Practitioner. 2015;20:12–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, Sultan C. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia A report of the French- American-British Cooperative group. Br J Haematol. 1976;33:451–458. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellström-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–951. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sambrook J, Rusell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cascorbi I, Brockmöller J, Roots I. A C4887A polymorphism in exon 7 of human CYP1A1: population frequency, mutation linkages, and impact on lung cancer susceptibility. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4965–4969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Krajinovic M, Labuda D, Richer C, Karimi S, Sinnett D. Susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: influence of CYP1A1, CYP2D6, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms. Blood. 1999;93:1496–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rodriguez-Antona C, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics and cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:1679–1679. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeng W, Li Y, Lu E, Ma M. CYP1A1 rs1048943 and rs4646903 polymorphisms associated with laryngeal cancer susceptibility among Asian populations: a meta‐analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20:287–293. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duarte EC, Ribeiro DC, Gomez MV, Ramos-Jorge ML, Gomez RS. Genetic polymorphisms of carcinogen metabolizing enzymes are associated with oral leukoplakia development and p53 overexpression. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1101–1106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jang JH, Cotterchio M, Borgida A, Gallinger S, Cleary SP. Genetic variants in carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes, cigarette smoking and pancreatic cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:818–827. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Catsburg C, Joshi AD, Corral R, Lewinger JP, Koo J, John EM, Ingles SA, Stern MC. Polymorphisms in carcinogen metabolism enzymes, fish intake, and risk of prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1352–1359. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Justenhoven C. Polymorphisms of phase I and phase II enzymes and breast cancer risk. Front Genet. 2012;3:258. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bolufer P, Barragan E, Collado M, Cervera J, Lopez JA, Sanz MA. Influence of genetic polymorphisms on the risk of developing leukemia and on disease progression. Leuk Res. 2006;30:1471–91. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gough AC, Miles JS, Spurr NK, Moss JE, Gaedigk A, Eichelbaum M, Wolf CR. Identification of the primary gene defect at the cytochrome P450 CYP2D locus. Nature. 1990;347:773–776. doi: 10.1038/347773a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lemos MC, Cabrita FJ, Silva HA. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6, GSTM1 and NAT2 and susceptibility to haematological neoplasias. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1225–1229. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.7.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silveira , VS , Canalle R, Scrideli CA, Queiroz RGP, Tone LG. Role of the CYP2D6, EPHX1, MPO, and NQO1 genes in the susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Brazilian children. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010;51:48–56. doi: 10.1002/em.20510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Joseph T, Kusumakumary P, Chacko P, Abraham A, Radhakrishna Pillai M. Genetic polymorphism of CYP1A1, CYP2D6, GSTM1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Indian children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;43:560–567. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sim SC, Ingelman-Sundberg M. The human cytochrome P450 Allele Nomenclature Committee Web site: submission criteria, procedures, and objectives. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;320:183–191. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-998-2:183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Whyatt RM, Perera FP. Application of biologic markers to studies of environmental risks in children and the developing fetus. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(Suppl. 6):105–110. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu J, Zhao Q, Zhai YJ, He HR, Yang LH, Gao F, Zhou RS, Zheng J, Ma XC. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and risk of leukemia: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:2883–2902. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S92259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Roman E, Lightfoot T, Smith AG, Forman MR, Linet MS, Robison L, Simpson J, Kaatsch P, Grell K, Frederiksen K, Schüz J. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and birth weight: insights from a pooled analysis of case-control data from Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1437–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stejskalova L, Pavek P. The function of cytochrome P450 1A1 enzyme (CYP1A1) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in the placenta. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12:715–730. doi: 10.2174/138920111795470994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Juchau MR. Drug biotransformation in the placenta. Pharmacol Ther. 1980;8:501–524. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(80)90074-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu R, Zhang L, McHale CM, Hammond SK. Paternal smoking and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: systematic review and met-analysis. J Oncol. 2011;2011:854584. doi: 10.1155/2011/854584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Milne E, Greenop KR, Scott RJ, Bailey HD, Attia J, Dalla-Pozza L, de Klerk NH, Armstrong BK. Parental prenatal smoking and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:43–53. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Slatter TL, Park L, Anderson K, Lailai-Tasmania V, Herbison P, Clow W, Royds JA, Devenish C, Hung NA. Smoking during pregnancy causes double-strand DNA break damage to the placenta. Hum Pathol. 2014;45:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Linet MS, Kim KP, Rajaraman P. Children’s exposureto diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk:epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatric Radiol . 2009;39 (suppl 1):S4–26. doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-1026-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wiemels J. Perspectives on the causes of childhood leukemia. Chem Biol Interact. 2012;196:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jin MW, Xu SM, An Q, Wang P. A review of risk factors for childhood leukemia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:3760–3764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bartley K, Metayer C, Selvin S, Ducore J, Buffler P. Diagnostic X-rays and risk of childhood leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:1628–1637. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Biology Research Communications are provided here courtesy of Shiraz University

RESOURCES