Abstract
Oxidative stress is significant in numerous types of disease including cancer. To protect cells and organs against reactive oxygen species (ROS), the body has evolved an antioxidant protection system that involved in the detoxification of ROS. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of anti-oxidative enzymes may dramatically change the activity of the encoded proteins; therefore, certain alleles can be established as risk factors for some kind of multi-factorial diseases including cancer. In present study we investigate the possible association between polymorphisms of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1, OMIM: 147450) and catalase (CAT, OMIM: 115500) genes and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The study included 204 colorectal cancer patients and 239 healthy control group matched for gender and age. Genotyping of SOD1 A251G and CAT C-262T were done by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. There was no significant association between CAT C-262T polymorphism and susceptibility to CRC (P>0.05). The carries of the G allele of SOD1 significantly showed higher prevalence in CRC patients compared with the control group (OR=1.84, 95% CI=1.13-2.98, P=0.013). We assessed the effect of combination of genotypes of the study polymorphisms on the risk of CRC. We found that the combination of AG+GG (SOD1) and CC (CAT) increases the risk of developing CRC (OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.25-4.52, P=0.008).
Key Words: SOD1, Catalase, Colorectal cancer, Genetic polymorphism
INTRODUCTION
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most serious public health problems. There are nearly one million cases of CRC diagnosed worldwide each year. CRC is the third and the fifth most common cancer in women and men respectively in Iran [1]. Etiological studies have attributed that CRC risk increased by several environmental factors such as red meat consumption, cigarette smoking and exposure to carcinogenic aromatic [2-5]. Interest in potential genetic variants in antioxidant pathways and disease progression has been increased [6]. The enzymes that are usually considered to be the frontline defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS) are through superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). SODs are a family of enzymes responsible for converting of superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. The SOD1 gene (OMIM: 147450) is located on chromosome 21p22.11 and contains 5 exons and 4 introns (7). Catalase is an enzyme that causes the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, thus preventing cells from high levels of ROS [8]. The CAT gene (OMIM: 115500) is placed on chromosome 11p13.31 and contains 13 exons.
Genetic variations in the antioxidant genes coding for the SOD and CAT may lead to decreased or impaired regulation of their enzymatic activity and alter ROS detoxification. Therefore, genetic variations among enzymes that protect the cell against ROS may modulate disease risk [9]. Among the three isoforms of SOD (SOD1, CuZn- SOD; SOD2, Mn-SOD; and SOD3, EC-SOD), SOD1 plays an important role as an intracellular cytoplasmic antioxidant enzyme and 251A/G sequence variant in intron 3 has been studied most frequently [7]. Also polymorphisms of CAT are associated with many cancers [10]. The C-262T polymorphism is a common variant in the promoter region of the CAT. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association of SOD1 A251G and CAT C-262T genetic polymorphisms with the risk of CRC in an Iranian population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects: The present population-based case-control study included a total of 204 (126 males, 78 females) patients with CRC and 239 (168 males, 71 females) disease free controls. All CRC patients were recruited from the chemotherapy department of Namazi hospital in Shiraz (Fars province, southern Iran). The mean age (SD) of the patients and the controls were 54.4 (14.0) and 53.4 (10.8) years, respectively. There was no significant difference in mean age between case and control groups (t=0.84, df=441, P=0.400). Iranian population is one of the most heterogeneous populations [11-13]. Therefore, we selected our patients and controls from the same ethnical religious group (Persian Muslims live in Fars province, southern Iran). Data on all CRC patients were obtained from personal interviews with patients. Informed consent was obtained from all Participants and the study was approved by the institutional review board at our University.
DNA extraction and genotyping analysis: Blood samples were obtained from the patient and control groups. Immediately after collection, whole blood was stored at −20°C until use. Genomic DNA for PCR was isolated from whole blood using the thawed blood samples by standard procedure [14]. The primers and PCR conditions for determining SOD1 A251G and CAT C-262T genotypes were the same as those reported previously [15-17] and shown in Table 1. For RFLP, the PCR products of SOD1 A251G and CAT C-262T SNPs were digested with MspI (5U at 37°C for 16h) and EcoRV (5U at 37°C for 16h) (Fermentas), respectively.
Table 1.
Genes | Sequences | Amplicon (bp) | T m (°C) |
---|---|---|---|
SOD1 | F 5′-AGTACTGTCAACCACTAGCA-3′ R 5′-CCAGTGTGCGGCCAATGATG-3′ |
570 | 63 |
CAT | F 5-′CTGATAACCGGGAGCCCCGCCCTGGGTTCGGATAT- 3′ R 5′-CTAGGCAGGCCAAGATTGGAAGCCCAATGG-3′ |
190 | 68 |
Statistical analysis: Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows (version 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A Chi-square test was performed for SOD1 and CAT polymorphisms to determine if the sample groups demonstrated Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the association between the polymorphisms and CRC risk. For both polymorphisms, the more common allele was considered as the reference, whereas the less common allele was examined as the variant. Mean ± SD are presented for continuous variables. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The genotype frequencies of the SOD1 A251G and CAT C-262T polymorphisms in the CRC and control groups are shown in Table 2. The genotypic frequencies for the both polymorphisms in cases (For SOD1 A251G polymorphism: χ2=1.78, df=1, P>0.05; For CAT C-262T polymorphism: χ2=1.08, df=1, P>0.05) and controls (For SOD1 A251G polymorphism χ2=0.11, df=1, P>0.05; For CAT C-262T polymorphism χ2=1.07, df=1, P>0.05) did not show significant deviation from expected frequencies based on Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Table 2.
Genotype | CRC (%) | Controls (%) | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
SOD1 A251G polymorphism | ||||
AA | 155 (76.0) | 204 (85.3) | 1.0 | - |
AG | 48 (23.5) | 34 (14.3) | 1.85 (1.14-3.02) | 0.013 |
GG | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.4) | 1.31 (0.08-21.20) | 0.846 |
AG+GG | 49 (24) | 35 (14.7) | 1.84 (1.13-2.98) | 0.013 |
CAT C-262 C polymorphism | ||||
CC | 132 (64.7) | 146 (61.1) | 1.0 | - |
CT | 67 (32.) | 85 (35.5) | 0.87 (0.58-1.29) | 0.499 |
TT | 5 (2.5) | 8 (3.4) | 0.69 (0.22-2.16) | 0.526 |
For SOD1 A251G polymorphism, the statistical analysis revealed that the AG vs AA genotype increased the risk of CRC (OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.14-3.02, P=0.013). Notably, the G allele (versus the A allele) significantly increased the risk of CRC (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.09-2.69, P=0.019). However, there was no significant association between the CAT C-262T polymorphism and susceptibility to CRC, (T allele vs C allele, OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.62-1.20, P=0.403; CT+TT vs CC, OR=0.85, 95% CI=0.58-1.26, P=0.433) (Table 2).
We also examined the combination effect of both SOD1 and catalase genetic polymorphisms on the CRC risk (Table 3). The results showed AG+GG genotype of SOD1 with CC genotype of catalase increases the rate of developing CRC (OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.25-4.52, P=0.008).
Table 3.
SOD1 | CAT | CRC | Controls | OR (95%) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | CT+TT | 59 (28.9) | 78 (32.6) | 1.0 | - |
AA | CC | 96 (47.1) | 126 (52.7) | 1.01 (0.66-1.54) | 0.974 |
AG+GG | CT+TT | 13 (6.4) | 15 (6.3) | 1.14 (0.50-2.59) | 0.744 |
AG+GG | CC | 36 (17.6) | 20 (8.4) | 2.38 (1.25-4.52) | 0.008 |
DISCUSSION
CRC is one of the main causes of cancer mortality worldwide. The incidence of CRC is increased in Iran in recent years and CRC is the third and the fifth most common cancer in women and men respectively in Iran [1, 18]. The incidences of polymorphism in genomic DNA, and the risk of tumor progression in patients with cancer can vary substantially between different ethnic groups [19-21]. Although many polymorphisms are functionally neutral, some affect the level of gene expression or the function of the coded protein [22]. In our present study, we analyzed the association between SOD1 A251G and CAT C-262T polymorphisms with the risk of CRC in the Iranian population. We found that the SOD1 G allele was associated with an increased risk of cancer, and we found no statistically significant difference in CAT C-262T polymorphism between the controls and patients. These observations support the suggestion that genetic polymorphisms in antioxidant enzymes may alter the risk of cancer among persons with increased oxidative stress or decreased antioxidant capacity. Several different types of diseases, including diabetes, age-related diseases and cancers are dependent to defects in antioxidant pathways [8,23, 24]. Antioxidant enzymes can catalytically eliminate free radicals and other reactive species. Among the antioxidant enzymes, SOD is considered to be important in the oxidant defense mechanism, as it is involved in the first line of defense [25].
Many studies examining the association between ROS and various diseases have revealed that decreased antioxidant activity or excessive oxidative stress can cause several pathologic states [8, 23-29]. We also examined the combination effect of both SOD1 and CAT genetic polymorphisms on CRC risk and found that AG+GG genotype of SOD1 with CC genotype of CAT increases rate of developing CRC (Table 3). Therefore, the CC genotype compared to other genotypes of the CAT gene may increase the risk of CRC. In conclusion, our data provides evidence that the SOD1 G allele is associated with an increased risk of CRC in Iranian population. The Large population- based prospective studies with ethnically diverse populations are warranted to verify these findings.
Acknowledgment
The authors are indebted to the participants for their close cooperation. This study was supported by Shiraz University.
Conflict of Interest:
The authors have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Mousavi SM, Gouya MM, Ramazani R, Davanlou M, Hajsadeghi N, Seddighi Z. Cancer incidence and mortality in Iran. Ann Oncol. 2008;20:556–563. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1191–1308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aykan NF. Red meat and colorectal cancer. Oncol Rev. 2015;9:288. doi: 10.4081/oncol.2015.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter D, Rosner BA, Willett WC, Speizer FE. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer in US women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:192–199. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.3.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heineman EF, Zahm SH, McLaughlin JK, Vaught JB. Increased risk of colorectal cancer among smokers: results of a 26-year follow-up of US veterans and a review. Int J Cancer. 1994;59:728–738. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910590603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Favatier F, Bornman L, Hightower LE, Gunther E, Polla BS. Variation in hsp gene expression and hsp polymorphism: do they contribute to differential disease susceptibility and stress tolerance? Cell Stress Chaperones. 1997;2:141–155. doi: 10.1379/1466-1268(1997)002<0141:vihgea>2.3.co;2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kang D, Lee KM, Park SK, Berndt SI, Peters U, Reding D, Chatterjee N, Welch R, Chanock S, Huang WY, Hayes RB. Functional variant of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2 V16A) polymorphism is associated with prostate cancer risk in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1581–1586. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Protection against oxidants in biological systems: the superoxide theory of oxygen toxicity. In: Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC, editors. Free radicals in biology and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989. pp. 86–187. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Forsberg L, Faire U, Morgenstern R. Oxidative stress, human genetic variation, and disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;389:84–93. doi: 10.1006/abbi.2001.2295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shen Y, Li D, Tian P, Shen K, Zhu J, Feng M, Wan C, Yang T, Chen L, Wen F. The catalase C-262T gene polymorphism and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e679. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mohamadinejad P, Saadat M. Genetic polymorphisms of XRCC1 (at codons 194 and 399) in Shiraz population (Fars province, southern Iran) Mol Biol Rep. 2008;35:669–672. doi: 10.1007/s11033-007-9138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rafiee L, Saadat I, Saadat M. Glutathione S-transferase genetic polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTO2) in three Iranian populations. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:155–158. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9565-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Saadat M. Distribution of ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in Iranian populations. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2015;4:63–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Newton CR. Mutational analysis: known mutations. In: McPherson MJ, Hames D, Taylor GR, editors. PCR2. A Practical Approach. Oxford: IRL Press; 1995. pp. 219–222. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ebrahimpour S, Saadat I. Association of CAT C-262T and SOD1 A251G single nucleotide polymorphisms susceptible to gastric cancer. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2014;3:223–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y, Zhang L, Sun D, Li Z, Wang L, Liu P. Genetic polymorphisms of superoxide dismutases, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase in age-related cataract. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2325–2332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zarei N, Saadat I, Farvardin-Jahromi M. The relationship between NQO1 C609T and CAT C-262T genetic polymorphisms and the risk of age-related cataracts. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2015;4:143–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Safaee A, Zali MR. Prognostic factors in 1,138 Iranian colorectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:683–688. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0463-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Perez LO, Abba MC, Dulout FN, Golijow CD. Evaluation of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum in La Plata, Argentina. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:1426–1429. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i9.1426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG. The common germline Arg72Pro polymorphism of p53 and increased longevity in humans. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:158–163. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.2.5249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Katkoori VR, Jia X, Shanmugam C, Wan W, Meleth S, Bumpers H, Grizzle WE, Manne U. Prognostic significance of p53 codon 72 polymorphism differs with race in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2406–2416. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ng PC, Henikoff S. Accounting for human polymorphisms predicted to affect protein function. Genome Res. 2002;12:436–446. doi: 10.1101/gr.212802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tang H, Dong X, Day RS, Hassan MM, Li D. Antioxidant genes, diabetes and dietary antioxidants in association with risk of pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:607–613. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Juronen E, Tasa G, Veromann S, Parts L, Tiidla A, Pulges R, Panov A, Soovere L, Koka K, Mikelsaar AV. Polymorphic glutathione S-transferases as genetic risk factors for senile cortical cataract in Estonians. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2262–2267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rajkumar S, Praveen MR, Gajjar D, Vasavada AR, Alapure B, Patel D, Kapur S. Activity of superoxide dismutase isoenzymes in lens epithelial cells derived from different types of age-related cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:470–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tiwari AK, Prasad P, Kumar BKT, Ammini AC, Gupta A, Gupta R. Oxidative stress pathway genes and chronic renal insufficiency in Asian Indians with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2009;23:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rajaraman P, Hutchinson A, Rothman N, Black PM, Fine HA, Loeffler JS, Selker RG, Shapiro WR, Linet MS, Inskip PD. Oxidative response gene polymorphisms and risk of adult brain tumors. Neuro-oncol. 2008;10:709–715. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang L, Tang D, Yappert MC, Borchman D. Oxidation induced changes in human lens epithelial cells 2. Mitochondria and the generation of reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;41:926–936. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cebrian A, Pharoah PD, Ahmed S, Smith PL, Luccarini C, Luben R, Redman K, Munday H, Easton DF, Dunning AM, Ponder BA. Tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in antioxidant defense enzymes and susceptibility to breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1225–1233. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]