Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a worldwide epidemic disorder with considerable health and economic consequences. Metformin is one of the most commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic drugs. Pharmacogenetic studies showed that variants in genes related to the pharmacokinetics of metformin were associated with glucose-lowering effect of metformin. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacogenetic variation in SLC47A1 (rs2289669) and metformin response in type 2 diabetes patients. Seventy one patients with type 2 diabetes were included in the study. The genotypes were determined by Tetra–ARMS–PCR method. There was a significant association between the study polymorphism and the response to metformin treatment with the highest HbA1C reduction in AG genotype. In the dominant model for A allele (AA+AG vs GG), patients with A allele had highest HbA1C reduction in response to metformin.
Key Words: Diabetes, Pharmacogenetics, SLC47A1, Polymorphism
INTRODUCTION
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic disorder characterized by impaired insulin secretion and insulin resistance [1]. Current therapies for T2DM include lifestyle modification and use of oral antidiabetic drugs [2]. Metformin is one of the most commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic drugs [3]. A recent meta-analysis study showed that metformin monotherapy reduced HbA1c in average by 1.12%. HbA1c is glycated haemoglobin and its level is an indicator of average plasma glucose concentration [4]. A considerable inter-individual variability exists in glucose-lowering response to metformin. Up to one third of patients do not respond adequately to metformin. This interindividual variability can be caused by nongenetic factors such as kidney or liver function and genetic factors such as variation in metformin transporter genes [5]. The SLC47A1 encodes a member of multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) transporter protein family. Metformin is one of the substrates of this transporter [6]. Recently, a noncoding SNP (rs2289669 G/A SNP) of SLC47A1 has been reported to influence the pharmacodynamic response to metformin, suggesting reduced transport activity of the transporter being associated with a higher reduction in HbA1c [7]. In this study, we studied the association between the SLC47A1 rs2289669 and metformin response in Iranian patients with T2DM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The 71 diabetes patients who gave informed consent for genetic investigation were the subjects of this study. Patient samples were collected from Bustan clinic in Shiraz. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed in patients according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association [8]. Patients with malignancies, chronic kidney disease, endocrine disorders, liver cirrhosis and systemic inflammatory disease were excluded. Drug-naïve patients with HbA1c in the range of 6.5-11% were included. Baseline HbA1c measurement was done within 1 week prior to the treatment initiation and a second measurement after 6 months of metformin monotherapy [9]. The primary study outcomes were based on reduction of HbA1c after 6 months of metformin therapy according to the results of A Diabetes Outcomes Progression Trial (ADOPT) which showed that maximal response to metformin was recorded after the 6-month treatment [10]. SLC47A1 rs2289669 variant was genotyped by Tetra–ARMS–PCR method [11].
Statistical analysis were performed using SPSS 21 software. Continuous variables are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD). For the comparison of continuous variables, unpaired t-test were used. HbA1c response to metformin was compared across different genotypes by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's LSD post hoc test. General linear models were used for adjusting values and study of the response of HbA1c to metformin therapy according to genotypes.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Seventy one T2DM patients with an average age of 55.1±11.4 years and a mean BMI of 28.1±3.9 kg/m2 were included in the study. Table 1 shows mean level of HbA1c before and after initiation of metformin treatment. The mean baseline level of HbA1c before initiation of metformin treatment was 9.08±1.51%. During first 6 months after initiation of metformin treatment HbA1c level was reduced in the entire study group and the mean decrease of HbA1c (ΔHbA1c) during metformin as a monotherapy was 1.74±1.50%.
Table 1.
Variant | Range | Mean ± SD |
---|---|---|
HbA1C | 6.1-12.9 | 9.08±1.51 |
HbA1C After 6 M | 5.3-11.3 | 7.34±1.22 |
Δ HbA1C | 0.6-6.0 | 1.74±1.50 |
The association of the study genotypes and ΔHbA1c is shown in Table 2. The study sample was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2=0.50, df=1, P=0.48). We observed significant association between the rs2289669 polymorphism and HbA1c reduction after initiation of metformin therapy. There was a significant difference between SLC47A1 rs2289669 genotype groups in response to metformin. Also, the highest HbA1c reduction was observed in AG genotype.
Table 2.
Polymorphism | GG | AG | AA | P (Between groups) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patients numbers (%) | 24 (33.8) | 37 (52.1) | 10 (14.1) | |
ΔHbA1c (%) | 0.91±0.84 | 2.44±1.51 | 1.15±1.49 | <0.001 |
P LSD | - | <0.001 | 0.63 | |
*P Adjusted | <0.001 |
P Adjusted: values after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, baseline HbA1c level and metformin dose in general linear models.
This population-based cohort study in diabetic patients showed that the rs2289669 polymorphism was associated with the HbA1c lowering effect of metformin. Patients with AG genotype had highest HbA1C reduction in response to metformin. Several studies reported a link between SLC47A1 rs2289669 polymorphism with HbA1c reduction by metformin [7,9,12]. Tkác et al 2012 reported that the homozygous carriers of SLC47A1 rs2289669 A allele have twofold reduction in HbA1c during the first 6 months of metformin treatment in comparison with the rest of diabetes patients [9]. Also, the current study confirms the results of a preliminary study of Becker et al. who identified 116 metformin users in the prospective epidemiological Rotterdam study and found an increase of metformin effect of 0.3% per one A-allele of this variant [7]. In other study of Chinese patients, The AA homozygous carriers of the SLC47A1 rs2289669 G>A polymorphism had a lower clearance (P<0.01) of metformin than carriers of the wild type [12]. The mechanism whereby this polymorphism affects metformin action is not elucidated so far, because it is a non-coding intronic variant. It is possible that the A-variant is in linkage disequilibrium with a reduced function variant [9]. To conclude, we found an association between the SNP rs2289669 in the SLC47A1, encoding the MATE1 transporter, and the glucose-lowering effect of metformin. These results suggest that MATE1 may have an important role in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of metformin. This is the first epidemiological study assessing the role of SLC47A1 polymorphism in metformin response in Iranian population.
Acknowledgments:
The authors would like to thank all participants who willingly contributed to the study.
Conflict of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Cheung CY, Tso AW, Cheung BM, Xu A, Fong CH, Ong KL, Law LS, Wat NM, Janus ED, Sham PC, Lam KS. The KCNJ11 E23K polymorphism and progression of glycaemia in Southern Chinese: a long-term prospective study. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Semiz S, Dujic T, Causevic A. Pharmacogenetics and personalized treatment of type 2 diabetes. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2013;23:154–171. doi: 10.11613/BM.2013.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) Lancet. 1998;352:854–865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hirst JA, Farmer AJ, Ali R, Roberts NW, Stevens RJ. Quantifying the effect of metformin treatment and dose on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:446–445. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Graham GG1, Punt J, Arora M, Day RO, Doogue MP, Duong JK, Furlong TJ, Greenfield JR, Greenup LC, Kirkpatrick CM, Ray JE, Timmins P, Williams KM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:81–98. doi: 10.2165/11534750-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanihara Y, Masuda S, Sato T, Katsura T, Ogawa O, Inui K. Substrate specificity of MATE1 and MATE2-K, human multidrug and toxin extrusions/H(+)-organic cation antiporters. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;74:359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Becker ML, Visser LE, van Schaik RH, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Stricker BH. Genetic variation in the multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 transporter protein influences the glucose-lowering effect of metformin in patients with diabetes: a preliminary study. Diabetes. 2009;58:745–749. doi: 10.2337/db08-1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(Suppl. 1):S43–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tkáč I, Klimčáková L, Javorský M, Fabianová M, Schroner Z, Hermanová H, Babjaková E, Tkáčová R. Pharmacogenomic association between a variant in SLC47A1 gene and therapeutic response to metformin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:189–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01691.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP. Glycaemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. New Engl J Med. 2006;355:2427–2443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ye S, Dhillon S, Ke X, Collins AR, Day IN. An efficient procedure for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:E88–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.17.e88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.He R, Zhang D, Lu W, Zheng T, Wan L, Liu F, Jia W. SLC47A1 gene rs2289669 GA variants enhance the glucose-lowering effect of metformin via delaying its excretion in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;109:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]