Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jul 31;7:6874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07269-7

Heterodera schachtii Tyrosinase-like protein - a novel nematode effector modulating plant hormone homeostasis

Samer S Habash 1, Zoran S Radakovic 1, Radomira Vankova 2, Shahid Siddique 1, Petre Dobrev 2, Cynthia Gleason 3, Florian M W Grundler 1,✉, Abdelnaser Elashry 1
PMCID: PMC5537230  PMID: 28761178

Abstract

The beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii causes major yield losses in sugar beet. Understanding the interaction between H. schachtii and its host plant is important for developing a sustainable management system. Nematode effectors play a crucial role in initializing and sustaining successful parasitism. In our study, we identified a gene (Hs-Tyr) encoding a tyrosinase functional domain (PF00264). We describe Hs-Tyr as a novel nematode effector. Hs-Tyr is localized in the nematode esophageal gland. Up-regulation of its expression coincided with the parasitic developmental stages of the nematode. Silencing Hs-Tyr by RNA interference made the treated nematodes less virulent. When RNAi-treated nematodes succeeded in infecting the plant, developing females and their associated syncytial nurse cells were significantly smaller than in control plants. Ectopically expressing the Hs-Tyr effector in Arabidopsis increased plant susceptibility to H. schachtii, but not to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Interestingly, Hs-Tyr in the plant promoted plant growth and changed the root architecture. Additionally, the expression of Hs-Tyr in Arabidopsis caused changes in the homeostasis of several plant hormones especially auxin and the ethylene precursor aminocyclopropane-carboxylic acid.

Introduction

Plant parasitic nematodes cause massive yield losses in many important crops and are therefore considered as a major problem in crop production1. The beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii is an important sedentary parasite of sugar beet2. When conditions are favorable, the infective second stage juveniles (J2s) hatch from the eggs and spread in the soil. Having reached a host root, they enter it and migrate through the cells into the vascular cylinder. There, they search for a specific cell that is suitable to establish the initial syncytial cell (ISC)3, 4. From ISC a highly active syncytial nurse cells system develops through the fusion of neighboring cells5. The hypertrophic and hypermetabolic syncytium serves as the only source of nutrients for the developing juveniles. The nematodes undergo three molts before reaching the adult stage; males leave the root in a vermiform shape, whereas females remain at the root, grow to a lemon-like shape, and finally rupture the root cortex. After mating, females produce eggs inside their bodies until they eventually die. After death, their cuticles turn into brown-tanned cysts containing the eggs.

Since the nematodes become sedentary upon feeding, they rely on their syncytia as the sole source of nutrition throughout their life cycle. Therefore, initiating and maintaining the syncytium is the key factor for successful parasitism. As a result, nematodes are equipped with effector proteins which support their parasitism by manipulating the host plant through suppression of plant defenses and the alteration of its developmental and physiological processes3, 6, 7.

Recent molecular studies have focused on the identification and characterization of effector proteins in order to understand their function in the plant-nematode interaction. Some effectors are able to modulate the plant defenses during the parasitism process, by either mimicking plant proteins or manipulating plant defenses. For example, a recent study found that the H. schachtii effector 4F01 is mimicking plant annexin and, by doing so, alters the host defenses against nematodes8. In another example, effector 10A06 has been shown to interact with spermidine synthase, and this interaction disturbs the host´s ability to produce defense-associated compounds such as salicylic acid9. According to a recent report, effector 30C02 binds and inhibits the pathogenesis related protein β-1,3-endoglucanase in the infected Arabidopsis plants, and thus, increases host susceptibility to nematode infection10. Nematode effectors can also affect basal immune responses. Basal defenses may be triggered by cell wall fragments produced during the nematode’s migration through the root or by unidentified PAMPs. However, H. schachtii venom-allergen like protein (VAP) acts as an apoplastic immune repressor which dampens the plant’s immune responses. Overexpressing VAP in Arabidopsis also increased plant susceptibility to unrelated pathogens, suggesting that it interferes with defense responses to different biotic stresses11.

In addition to effectors that seem to target plant defenses, nematodes are also able to produce molecules with hormone activity. These effectors enhance the plant’s physiological activities to the benefit of the nematodes. Recently, H. schachtii juveniles were shown to secrete cytokinins into the feeding site, which stimulate the cell division and growth needed for feeding site formation12. Additionally, nematodes secrete peptides that mimic the family of plant peptide hormones called CLEs, and this enables the nematodes to developmentally reprogram the root cells in order to initiate and maintain its feeding site13.

Based on an analysis of the H. schachtii transcriptome, we identified a novel candidate effector that encodes a nematode protein with a Tyrosinase domain (Hs-Tyr). Tyrosinases are copper monooxygenases that catalyze the hydroxylation of monophenols and the oxidation of o-diphenols to o-quinols. As polyphenol oxidases that are involved in the formation of pigments such as melanin and other polyphenolic compounds. They exist in prokaryotes as well as in eukaryotes.

Within the Hs-Tyr sequence, we found a signal peptide but no transmembrane domain suggesting that it is a secreted protein. Here, we show that Hs-Tyr is transcribed in the esophageal gland and is required for successful nematode parasitism. Moreover, expressing the Hs-Tyr in Arabidopsis enhances the plants’ susceptibility to H. schachtti, promotes vegetative growth and induces hormonal changes, suggesting that Hs-Tyr affects plant growth and development to support nematode parasitism.

Results

Sequence domains prediction and phylogenetic analysis

The transcriptome analysis of H. schachtii J2s using next generation sequencing (Illumina) revealed a sequence that we designated Hs-Tyr (accession No. KU975565). It contains a tyrosinase domain (E-value: 3.2E-11) and four SHK domain like sequences (E-value: 2.2E-34) as predicted by Pfam domain analysis. Further sequence analysis predicted that the protein contains a signal peptide of 22 amino acids and lacks any transmembrane domains (Supplementary Fig. S1). Aligning Hs-Tyr to other tyrosinase-Like genes from several nematode species revealed a high level of sequence and structure similarity. In comparison to Hs-Tyr, Ce-tyr4 (Caenorhabditis elegans), Nab_25123_c0_seq. 1 (Nacobus aberrans), and GPLIN_000202700 (Globodera pallida) have the most similar organization of functional domains. The phylogenetic analysis of the nematode tyrosinase-like genes based on domain similarity showed that tyrosinases of plant parasites cluster separately from that of free-living and animal-parasitic nematodes. Furthermore, within the cluster of plant parasitic nematodes, the tyrosinases of the cyst- and root knot-nematodes cluster separately (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Hs-Tyr phylogenetic tree for tyrosinase-like genes of several nematode species. Tyrosinase-like gene from cyst nematodes cluster separately from root-knot nematodes among plant parasites, which, on the other hand, are separated from the animal-parasitic and free-living nematodes. Numbers on branches are the percentage of bootstrap (100 bootstrap).

The Hs-Tyr localization and expression profile analysis

To localize Hs-Tyr expression in the nematode body we performed a whole mount in situ hybridization on pre-infective J2s. In fact, the hybridized riboprobe was visualized within the esophageal gland cells of the J2s (Fig. 2a), while no signal appeared in the negative control using the sense probe (Fig. 2b). We further studied the expression profile of Hs-Tyr in correlation with the eggs, J2s, J3s, J4s, females and late females by qRT-PCR amplification using stage-specific cDNA. Hs-Tyr expression was found to be the lowest in eggs compared with the infective stages. The expression of Hs-Tyr was not significantly changed in pre-parasitic J2s, but there was a massive increase in expression in the later life stages when the nematodes had started feeding. The highest expression was in J3s. Later, gene expression decreased in J4s and female stages. The high expression of Hs-Tyr in the parasitic stages compared to the pre-parasitic stages suggests that it plays a role in parasitism (Fig. 2c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Hs-Tyr expression localization and profiling. (a) Localization of Hs-Tyr transcripts in the esophageal gland cells of H. schachtii J2s by whole mount in situ hybridization of digoxigenin-labeled antisense cDNA. (b) In situ hybridization negative control treated with digoxigenin-labeled sense probes showing no signals in the esophageal gland (Bar = 100 μm). (c) Relative mRNA expression levels of Hs-Tyr quantified by qPCR in six different life stages of H. schachtii. The fold change values were calculated and represent changes in mRNA level in pre-infective J2s, J3, J4, females and late females relative to that of eggs. Data are averages of three biologically independent experiments, each consisting of three technical replicates. H. schachtii actin was used as an internal control to normalize gene expression level.

The effect of Hs-Tyr silencing and ectopic expression in the plant on nematode infection

In order to analyze the role of Hs-Tyr for H. schachtii parasitism, we silenced Hs-Tyr in the nematodes by RNA-interference. Soaking the pre-parasitic J2s in Hs-Tyr dsRNA knocked down 80% of the endogenous Hs-Tyr transcript compared with nematodes treated with GFP dsRNA (Supplementary Fig. S2). In the next experiment, plants were inoculated with the dsRNA-treated nematodes. Soaked nematodes were clearly affected in their development. The numbers of males and females per plant (12 days after inoculation (DAI)) decreased significantly compared with nematodes soaked in the GFP dsRNA control (Fig. 3a). Total nematode infection decreased by 50% (Fig. 3b). The average female size was also reduced significantly compared with the GFP-treated nematodes (Fig. 3c). Syncytia associated with Hs-Tyr treated nematodes were significantly smaller, reaching a size of 0.2 mm2 compared with 0.27 mm2 in the control (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effects of silencing Hs-Tyr on H. schachtii parasitism. The graphs show the results of bio-assays with J2 soaked in Hs-Tyr -specific dsRNA compared with J2 soaked in GFP dsRNA as a negative control. The following parameters were analysed: (a) number of males and females (b) total number of nematode infections (c) female size (d) size of syncytia. Data are based on three independent experiments. Each bar represents the mean ± standard error of n > 35. Asterisk indicate significant differences based on Student’s t-test (P < 0.05).

In order to examine whether expressing Hs-Tyr in Arabidopsis affects susceptibility to H. schachtii infection, three separate transgenic Arabidopsis lines ectopically expressing 35 s::Hs-Tyr were infected with J2s. Recombinant expression of Hs-Tyr in the transgenic plants was confirmed and quantified using qPCR (Supplementary Fig. S3). The transgenic lines showed increased susceptibility to nematode infection. The total number of nematodes and the number of mature females increased significantly in lines 2.3 and 5.7 while no significant increase was found in line 14.1 (Fig. 4a and b). Similarly, the size of the mature females and their associated syncytia was increased significantly in the overexpression lines 2.3 and 5.7, while line 14.1 showed no significant difference (Fig. 4c and d). We then analyzed susceptibility of the transgenic plant lines to M. incognita and found that the number and size of galls did not differ from those of the wild type Col-0 (Supplementary Fig. S4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effect of ectopic expression of Hs-Tyr on the development of H. schachtii in Arabidopsis. The following parameters were analysed: (a) total number of nematode infection per plant (b) number of females per plant (c) female size (d) syncytium size, compared with the wild type Col-0. Data are based on three independent experiments. Each bar represents the mean ± standard error of n > 35. Asterisks indicate significant differences based on Student’s t-test (P < 0.05).

Ectopic expression of Hs-Tyr in Arabidopsis stimulates plant growth and modulates root architecture

Growth and development of the transgenic Arabidopsis plants ectopically expressing the Hs-Tyr were analyzed and compared with Col-0. The Hs-Tyr expressing lines did not show changes in root length and root weight compared with Col-0 (Supplementary Fig. S5), but the root architecture was significantly changed. The number of lateral roots compared with the Col-0 plants was higher (Fig. 5a) and the shoot weight and growth were significantly increased (Fig. 5b,c and d).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effect of ectopic expression of Hs-Tyr on Arabidopsis growth. The following parameters were analysed: (a) number of lateral roots per plant (b) shoot weight and visible increase in the shoot growth. (c) and (d) comparison of the wild type Col-0 with the overexpression lines. Data are based on three independent experiments. Each bar represents the mean ± standard error of n = 27. Asterisks indicate significant differences based on Student’s t-test (P < 0.05).

Ectopic expression of Hs-Tyr triggers changes in plant hormone homeostasis

To explain the changes of the plant growth, endogenous hormones were measured in Hs-Tyr expressing Arabidopsis roots and compared with the wild type Col-0 using HPLC-MS. Roots of line 2.3, which showed the highest susceptibility, were analyzed and compared with Col-0 roots. Results show that the levels of the auxin precursor indole-3-acetonitrile and of IAA metabolites were significantly increased in Hs-Tyr expressing plants (Fig. 6a–c). The level of jasmonate precursor cisOPDA was lower in the transgenic plants, while no significant change of jasmonic acid and jasmonate isoleucine was observed (Fig. 6d). Concentration of the immediate ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) was higher in the roots of transgenic plants compared with Col-0 (Fig. 6f). No significant changes were detected in the SA concentration (Fig. 6e).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Concentration of various hormones (pmol.g−1FW) in roots of transgenic plants ectopically expressing Hs-Tyr compared with Col-0. IAA, indole-3-acetic acid; IAA-Asp, IAA-aspartate; IAA-Glu, IAA-glutamate; OxIAA, oxo-IAA; OxIAA-GE = oxo-IAA-glucose ester; IAN, Indole-3-acetonitrile (IAA precursor); of jasmonic acid (JA), JA-isoleucine (JA-Ile), JA precursor cis-12-oxo-10,15-phytodienoic acid (cisOPDA), salicylic acid (SA) and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). Each bar represents the mean ± standard error of n = 5. Asterisks indicate significant differences based on Student’s t-test (P < 0.05).

Hs-Tyr localization in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves

To investigate the action site of Hs-Tyr in the plant, a transient transformation of N. benthamiana leaves was performed. The leaves were infiltrated with Agrobacterium expressing Hs-Tyr::GFP and checked for green fluorescence after 5 days. Results showed that the protein was translated and its fluorescent signal was localized in the cytoplasm of the N. benthamiana leaf cells (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Subcellular localization of Hs-Tyr::GFP within N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cell. (a) The green fluorescence originates from Hs-Tyr::GFP fusion protein localized in the cytoplasm of the cells. (b) Merged image shows the GFP signal in bright field.

Discussion

H. schachtii can dramatically decrease the yield of sugar beet. Understanding the mechanisms by which nematodes manipulate the plants may give clues in search for novel management strategies. Recent advances in techniques such as RNAseq and next generation sequencing facilitate the mining of plant parasitic nematode genes involved in parasitism14, 15. The ability of H. schachtii to infect the model host plant A. thaliana 16 opens additional perspectives in studying gene functions. Using available transcriptomic data of H. schachtii we identified a putative effector that may play a role in nematode parasitism. The bioinformatic analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence showed the presence of a signal peptide and a lack of transmembrane domains, which is a strong indication that the protein is secreted. These criteria have been used as standards for screening secreted nematode effectors in other labs17, 18. Furthermore, checking for the functional domain(s) showed the presence of a Tyrosinase domain that is, to our knowledge, the first time described in relation to nematode plant-parasitism. Phylogenetic analysis revealed Hs-Tyr homologues in plant parasitic, animal parasitic and free-living nematodes. The constructed phylogenetic tree displays the relation of Hs-Tyr to other nematodes (Fig. 1). It shows that Ascaris spp. is clustering separately from C. elegans and plant-parasitic nematode species. Furthermore, cyst nematodes form a subcluster separate from root-knot nematodes within the plant-parasitic nematode cluster. This separation may also hint to a functional divergence and could explain why the Hs-Tyr transgenic lines were more susceptible to cyst nematodes but not to root-knot nematodes.

Supported by several experimental approaches we show that Hs-Tyr contributes to successful parasitism of the cyst nematode. First, we found that Hs-Tyr expression is localized within the dorsal oesophageal gland shown by using whole mount in situ hybridization; this suggests that the protein is secreted from the dorsal gland into the plant. Secondly, we showed a dramatic increase in Hs-Tyr expression after Arabidopsis infection, which is further linking Hs-Tyr expression with a role in parasitism. Knocking down Hs-Tyr by RNAi resulted in approximately 80% decrease of Hs-Tyr expression. This result is in a range that was found in previous studies on gene silencing by RNAi19. The Hs-Tyr-silenced nematodes were suffering throughout their life stages as indicated by the small size of females and associated syncytia (Fig. 2). These findings are similar to previous studies, which showed that reduced expression of nematode effectors obstructs nematode development in plants11, 20. Furthermore, we show that expressing Hs-Tyr in the Arabidopsis plants increased the plant susceptibility to the H. schachtii, but not to the root-knot nematode M. incognita. We therefore conclude that Hs-Tyr functions specifically within a pathway supporting an efficient H. schachtii parasitism, while being redundant for M. incognita.

We did not observe any hypersensitive responses in the infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves and in the transgenic plant, suggesting that Hs-Tyr was not recognised by the plant immune system. This assumption is in agreement with the lack of significant changes in JA and SA levels. According to previous analyses, some nematode effectors induced a hypersensitive response, however, Hs-Tyr obviously does not belong to this type of effectors21.

Interestingly, Hs-Tyr expression in the plant caused changes in the plant growth represented by an increasing number of plant lateral roots and shoot weight, both features that may be related to the observed changes in hormone homeostasis. In fact, we showed that auxin biosynthesis was enhanced by Hs-Tyr expression in the plant, as indicated by higher content of both auxin precursor and auxin metabolites in the transgenic plant. Auxin homeostasis in roots is well known to determine lateral root formation22. Hyper-susceptibility of the Hs-Tyr overexpression plants to nematodes could be correlated to the hormonal changes in two ways. First, a high concentration of the plant ACC/ET results in higher attraction of the infective J2s to the roots, which leads to the increase of the number of J2s infecting the plant. This explanation is supported by previous studies, which showed that root exudates of ET-overexpressing mutants are more attractive to nematodes23. Furthermore, treating the plant with ethephon as a source of ET, increased attraction of the pre-infective J2s. In contrast, when ACC inhibited by aminooxyacetic acid treatment, the number of females and males developing on the plants was reduced24. Secondly, a lower concentration of jasmonic acid increases susceptibility of the transgenic plants towards J2s. In fact, it was shown that JA is a main player during early plant defence against nematode infection. On the other hand, nematodes were shown to trigger up-regulation of plant genes which suppress JA-based defence during the infection24. Additionally, the Arabidopsis mutants DELAYED DEHISCENCE 2 (dde2) and LIPOXYGENASE 6 (lox6), which are deficient in JA biosynthesis show higher susceptibility towards H. schachtii and increased female development compared to wild-type plants24. These results indicate that Hs-Tyr interferes with plant growth pathways and triggers hormonal changes promoting nematode parasitism12, 25, 26.

Taken together, our results clearly identify Hs-Tyr as an effector protein produced in the esophageal gland and playing an important role in parasitism of H. schachtii. Functional analysis of the protein suggests a mode of action through changes in the homeostasis of plant hormones.

Methods

Plant growth and nematode culture

Transgenic lines and the Col-0 wild type Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heyn plants were grown aseptically on agar medium supplemented with modified Knop’s nutrient solutions for H. schachtii infection and on MS medium for M. incognita under conditions described previously16.

Mature cysts were collected from white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) cvar. Albatros plants in funnels and hatched in 3 mM ZnCl2 16. The freshly hatched pre-parasitic second stage juveniles (J2s) were collected for direct RNA extraction, infecting the Arabidopsis plants for post infective stages collection and for infection assay.

The M. incognita J2s were collected from egg masses cultured on tomato grown in the greenhouse. Eggs were isolated from egg masses on tomato roots with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite and rinsed with water on a 25-µm sieve. Eggs were hatched in a solution of 2 ml of gentamycin sulphate (22.5 mg.ml−1) and 150 µl of nystatin (10.000 U.ml−1) in 30 ml water for 4 days at room temperature in the dark. The hatched nematodes were collected and further surface sterilized as described previously27. Briefly, nematodes were surface sterilized by incubation for 20 min in 0.5% (w/v) streptomycin/penicillin solution, for 20 min in 0.1% (w/v) ampicillin/gentamycin solution, for 5 min in sterile tap water, and for 3 min in 0.1% (v/v) chlorhexidine solution. The nematodes were subsequently washed three times in sterile tap water and then used for infection.

Infection assay

Nematode infection assays on Arabidopsis plants either for the RNA interference (RNAi) experiments or on Hs-Tyr overexpression lines were performed for the H. schachtii as described before28. Briefly, seeds were plated for ten days on 0.2% Knop medium. Plants were inoculated with 60–70 J2 nematodes per plant. Various susceptibility parameters including, number of male and female nematodes per plant was counted after 12 DAI. On the following day, the average sizes of female nematodes and associated syncytia were measured. All experiments were repeated independently three times. Each experiment contained 12 plants per line.

For M. incognita infection, ten days old plants on MS media were infected with 100 nematodes per plant. Number and size of galls were collected after 22 days. Ten plants per line and wild type Col-0 were infected. All measures were taken using Leica M165C Binocular (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and Leica Application Suite software. All experiments were repeated independently three times.

Sequence analysis and phylogeny

Hs-Tyr was determined as one of the predicted putative secreted protein (PSPs) in a H. schachtii transcriptome assembly (Elashry et al. unpublished). The Hs-Tyr sequence was translated using CLC genomics workbench (V8.0) and analysed to predict the longest ORF and functional domain(s) by Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/) and HMMER algorithm29, signal peptide by signalP4 server30, and transmembrane domain by TMHMM31.

Hs-Tyr homologues in other nematode species were identified using BLASTP search against the nr database in the NCBI database. Further, we downloaded transcriptomes of M. incognita 32, M. hapla 33, Nacobus aberrans 14, H. avenae 34 and G. pallida 35. All transcriptomes were examined by CLC genomics workbench (V8.0) to identify Hs-Tyr homologues. All Hs-Tyr best hit homologues (see Supplementary Table S1) were analysed structurally to confirm similarities of their functional domains and aligned to each other to build a phylogenetic tree by UPGMA algorithm with distance measured by Jukes-Cantor and 100 bootstraps (CLC genomics workbench V.8.0).

In situ hybridization

Subsequent PCR was performed on gene specific PCR product using primers in Supplementary Table S2 with presence of DIG-labelled deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) (Roche). Riboprobes were prepared using single sense primer (negative control) and the antisense primer. The riboprobes hybridized in pre-parasitic J2s as described previously36. The hybridized nematodes were visualized using the DMI2000 compound microscope (Leica Microsystems).

Developmental expression pattern analysis

Real time quantitative PCR was used to analyse the Hs-Tyr transcript at different developmental stages of H. schachtii using a gene specific primers (Supplementary Table S2). Around 3000 eggs and 3000 pre-parasitic J2s were collected directly from cysts. Around 500–600 nematodes were collected manually by separating them from the A. thaliana roots after 5, 10, 15, 20 DAI representing J3s, J4s, females and late females respectively.

RNA was extracted using NucleoSpin RNA kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL) following the manufacture´s protocol. The first strand cDNA was synthesized using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) in presence of the oligo-dT primer. The resulted cDNA were tested for the expression changes using the Stepone Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) following the amplification conditions: 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s (40 cycles). Each sample contained 10 μl of Fast SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Invitrogen), 9 μl of the primer mix with final concentration 1 μM for each primer, 1 μl of cDNA. The amplified data were analysed using one step system to create Ct values. The resulted data were analysed and relative expression was calculated37. Actin was used as internal control for all experiments. Three biological replicates from each stage were used with three technical replicates.

RNA interference and Hs-Tyr silencing in nematodes

Hs-Tyr specific dsRNA was generated following the manufacturer’s instructions of MEGAscript T7 kit (Ambion, Life Technologies). The GFP DNA fragment was amplified to synthesise dsRNA as a negative control.

Freshly hatched nematodes were soaked for one day in 50 µL soaking mix (1 µg/µL dsRNA (25 µL), 10x soaking buffer (5 µL), 100 mM spermidine (1.5 µL), 500 mM octopamine (5 µL), nematodes in water (13.5 µL)). After that, nematodes were washed three times with sterile water and sterilized using HgCl2 for 4 min. Nematodes were washed three times with fresh water. After sterilization, nematodes were divided to two parts. One part was used to evaluate the gene expression after silencing by qPCR. While, the second part was used to infect the Arabidopsis plants as described above.

Construct generation and N. benthamiana agroinfiltration

The Hs-Tyr without signal peptide-encoding region was cloned in the binary expression vector pMDC83 using primers in Supplementary Table S2. The pMDC83 vector contains C-terminal GFP fusion protein driven by 2 × 35 S promoter38. The Hs-Tyr::GFP construct was transformed in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101::pMP9039. The transformed Agrobacterium were grown overnight in 50 ml YEB liquid medium with 10 mg.ml−1 gentamycin, 50 mg.ml−1 kanamycin and 50 mg.ml−1 rifampicin to an OD600 of 0.8 in an incubator/shaker at 28 °C. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 7 min at room temperature. The pellet was suspended in infiltration buffer39. Bacterial suspensions were diluted in the infiltration buffer to OD600 = 1. After incubation for 2–4 h at RT, Agrobacteria suspensions were infiltrated in the abaxial side of 6 weeks N. benthamiana leaves by using 1 ml syringe. For co-infiltration of RNA silencing inhibitor P19, an equal volume of a bacterial suspension harbouring pBin61-P1940 was mixed and infiltrated. Infiltrated plants were incubated for 5 days. Slides were made from the infiltrated leaves and tested under the confocal microscope for detecting the green signal in the leaves cells.

Production of transgenic lines, phenotyping and infection assays

The Hs-Tyr ORF without signal peptide was cloned into the binary Gateway overexpression vector pB2GW741. The construct was then transferred to the A. tumefaciens strain GV3101, and transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 using the floral dip method42. The seeds of the primary transformants were selected for BASTA resistance (BayerCropScience, Monheim, Germany). In the T2 generation, the lines segregating 3:1 (BASTA-resistant/BASTA-susceptible) were grown to the next generation. Three homozygous lines were selected on BASTA plates and used in the study.

The selected lines were grown on MS plates for 10 days, then several phenotypes were measured and compared with the wild type plants Col-0 including the number of the lateral roots, the main root length, the fresh root weight and the fresh shoot weight. The experiment was repeated 3 times and each experiment consists of 9 plants for each line. The selected lines were subjected as well to the infection of the nematodes H. schachtii and M. incognita as mentioned in the infection assay section.

Hormone analysis

Root samples were collected from ten-days old plants. Five root samples (150 mg each) were collected from Hs-Tyr-expressing plants (Line 2.3) or Col-0. Root samples were purified and analysed as mentioned previously43, 44. Briefly, samples were homogenized with a ball mill (MM301, Retsch) and extracted in cold (−20 °C) methanol/water/formic acid (15/4/1 v/v/v). The following labelled internal standards (10 pmol/sample) were added: 13C6-IAA (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories); 2H4-SA (Sigma-Aldrich); 2H2-OxIAA and 2H5-JA(Olchemim). Extracts were purified using SPE-C18 column (SepPak-C18, Waters) and a mixed mode reverse phase–cation exchange SPE column (Oasis-MCX, Waters). Hormone metabolites were analysed using HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex) coupled to a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (3200 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems). Quantification of hormones was done using the isotope dilution method with multilevel calibration curves (r2 > 0.99). Data processing was carried out with Analyst 1.5 software (Applied Biosystems). Data are presented as mean ± standard error.

Statistical analysis

To test significant differences between the variants, Student’s t-test was used and data represented as mean values ± standard error. P < 0.05 was used to determine significance.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Info (783.5KB, doc)

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for funding Samer S. Habash (grant 91540873) to perform the work as a part of his PhD degree. We also thank Stephan Neumann, Gisela Sichtermann, Ute Schlee, and Thomas Gerhardt for technical support.

Author Contributions

S.S.H. performed most of the experiments. S.S.H. and Z.S.R. performed the RNAi experiments. S.S. performed confocal microscopy work. C.G. generate the transgenic plant lines. R.V. and P.D. performed the hormonal analysis. S.S.H., A.E., S.S. and F.M.W.G. planned and designed the research. S.S.H. drafted the manuscript. S.S.H., Z.S.R., R.V., P.D., C.G., A.E., S.S. and F.M.W.G. worked on the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07269-7

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Jones JT, et al. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013;14:946–961. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Müller J. The economic importance of Heterodera schachtii in Europe. Helminthologia. 1999;36:205–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wyss U, Grundler FMW. Feeding-Behavior of Sedentary Plant Parasitic Nematodes. Netherlands J. Plant Pathol. 1992;98:165–173. doi: 10.1007/BF01974483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wyss U, Zunke U. Observations on the behaviour of second stage juveniles of Heterodera schachtii inside host roots. Rev. Nematol. 1986;9:153–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grundler FMW, Sobczak M, Golinowski W. Formation of wall openings in root cells of Arabidopsis thaliana following infection by the plant-parasitic nematode Heterodera schachtii. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 1998;104:545–551. doi: 10.1023/A:1008692022279. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Davies LJ, Lilley CJ, Paul Knox J, Urwin PE. Syncytia formed by adult female Heterodera schachtii in Arabidopsis thaliana roots have a distinct cell wall molecular architecture. New Phytol. 2012;196:238–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gheysen G, Mitchum MG. How nematodes manipulate plant development pathways for infection. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011;14:415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel N, et al. A nematode effector protein similar to annexins in host plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2010;61:235–248. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hewezi T, et al. Arabidopsis spermidine synthase is targeted by an effector protein of the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:968–984. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.150557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hamamouch N, et al. The interaction of the novel 30C02 cyst nematode effector protein with a plant β-1,3-endoglucanase may suppress host defence to promote parasitism. J. Exp. Bot. 2012;63:3683–3696. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lozano-Torres JL, et al. Apoplastic Venom Allergen-like Proteins of Cyst Nematodes Modulate the Activation of Basal Plant Innate Immunity by Cell Surface Receptors. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004569. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Siddique S, et al. A parasitic nematode releases cytokinin that controls cell division and orchestrates feeding site formation in host plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015;112:12669–12674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503657112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang J, et al. Identification of potential host plant mimics of CLAVATA3/ESR (CLE)-like peptides from the plant-parasitic nematode Heterodera schachtii. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011;12:177–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00660.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eves-van den Akker S, et al. The transcriptome of Nacobbus aberrans reveals insights into the evolution of sedentary endoparasitism in plant-parasitic nematodes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014;6:2181–2194. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haegeman A, Bauters L, Kyndt T, Rahman MM, Gheysen G. Identification of candidate effector genes in the transcriptome of the rice root knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;14:379–390. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sijmons PC, Grundler FMW, Mende N, von Burrows PR, Wyss U. Arabidopsis thaliana as a new model host for plant-parasitic nematodes. Plant J. 1991;1:245–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1991.00245.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jones JT, et al. Identification and functional characterization of effectors in expressed sequence tags from various life cycle stages of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009;10:815–828. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00585.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang X, et al. Signal peptide-selection of cDNA cloned directly from the esophageal gland cells of the soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;14:536–544. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.4.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Urwin PE, Lilley CJ, Atkinson HJ. Ingestion of double-stranded RNA by preparasitic juvenile cyst nematodes leads to RNA interference. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2002;15:747–752. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.8.747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin B, et al. A novel nematode effector suppresses plant immunity by activating host reactive oxygen species-scavenging system. New Phytol. 2016;209:1159–1173. doi: 10.1111/nph.13701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ali S, et al. Analysis of putative apoplastic effectors from the nematode, Globodera rostochiensis, and identification of an expansin-like protein that can induce and suppress host defenses. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0115042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Overvoorde P, Fukaki H, Beeckman T. Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010;2:a001537. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wubben MJ, II, Su H, Rodermel SR, Baum TJ. Susceptibility to the sugar beet cyst nematode is modulated by ethylene signal transductionin Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2001;14:1206–1212. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kammerhofer N, et al. Role of stress-related hormones in plant defence during early infection of the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2015;207:778–89. doi: 10.1111/nph.13395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang G, et al. A root-knot nematode secretory peptide functions as a ligand for a plant transcription factor. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19:463–470. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang X, et al. A parasitism gene from a plant-parasitic nematode with function similar to CLAVATA3/ESR (CLE) of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005;6:187–191. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00270.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Postma WJ, et al. The effector SPRYSEC-19 of Globodera rostochiensis suppresses CC-NB-LRR-mediated disease resistance in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:944–954. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.200188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Siddique S, et al. Parasitic worms stimulate host NADPH oxidases to produce reactive oxygen species that limit plant cell death and promote infection. Science Signal. 2014;7:ra33. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids. Res. 2011;39:W29–37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Krogh A, Larsson B, Heijne Gvon, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Bio.l. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Abad P, et al. Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008;26:909–915. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Opperman CH, et al. Sequence and genetic map of Meloidogyne hapla: A compact nematode genome for plant parasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:14802–14807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805946105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kumar M, et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of the cereal cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cotton JA, et al. The genome and life-stage specific transcriptomes of Globodera pallida elucidate key aspects of plant parasitism by a cyst nematode. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R43. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Boer JM, Yan Y, Smant G, Davis EL, Baum TJ. In-situ Hybridization to Messenger RNA in Heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 1998;30:309–312. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:e45. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physio. 2003;133:462–469. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.027979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sparkes IA, Runions J, Kearns A, Hawes C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:2019–2025. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Voinnet O, Rivas S, Mestre P, Baulcombe D. An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus. Plant J. 2003;33:949–956. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karimi M, Inzé D, Depicker A. GATEWAYTM vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:193–195. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02251-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dobrev PI, Kaminek M. Fast and efficient separation of cytokinins from auxin and abscisic acid and their purification using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. J. Chrom A. 2002;950:21–29. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dobrev PI, Vanková R. Quantification of abscisic acid, cytokinin, and auxin content in salt-stressed plant tissues. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012;913:251–261. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-986-0_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Info (783.5KB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES