Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1987 Dec 1;6(12):3619–3626. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02693.x

Transmembrane topography of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor delta subunit.

P D McCrea 1, J L Popot 1, D M Engelman 1
PMCID: PMC553829  PMID: 3428268

Abstract

Current folding models for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) predict either four or five transmembrane segments per subunit. The N-terminus of each subunit is almost certainly extracellular. We have tested folding models by determining biochemically the cellular location of an intermolecular disulfide bridge thought to lie at the delta subunit C-terminus. Dimers of AChR linked through the delta-delta bridge were prepared from Torpedo marmorata and T.californica electric organ. The disulfide's accessibility to hydrophilic reductants was tested in a reconstituted vesicle system. In right-side-out vesicles (greater than 95% ACh binding sites outwards), the bridge was equally accessible whether or not vesicles had been disrupted by freeze--thawing or by detergents. Control experiments based on the rate of reduction of entrapped diphtheria toxin and measurements of radioactive reductant efflux demonstrated that the vesicles provide an adequate permeability barrier. In reconstituted vesicles containing AChR dimers in scrambled orientations, right-side-out dimers were reduced to monomers three times more rapidly than inside-out dimers, consistent with the measured rate of reductant permeation. These observations indicate that in reconstituted vesicles the delta-delta disulfide bridge lies in the same aqueous space as the ACh binding sites. They are most easily reconciled with folding models that propose an even number of transmembrane crossing per subunit.

Full text

PDF
3619

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anholt R., Lindstrom J., Montal M. Functional equivalence of monomeric and dimeric forms of purified acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo californica in reconstituted lipid vesicles. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Aug;109(2):481–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04819.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blatt Y., Montal M. S., Lindstrom J. M., Montal M. Monoclonal antibodies specific to the beta and gamma subunits of the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor inhibit single-channel activity. J Neurosci. 1986 Feb;6(2):481–486. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-02-00481.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bon F., Lebrun E., Gomel J., Van Rapenbusch R., Cartaud J., Popot J. L., Changeux J. P. Image analysis of the heavy form of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jun 25;176(2):205–237. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90421-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cartaud J., Popot J. L., Changeux J. P. Light and heavy forms of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata electric organ: morphological identification using reconstituted vesicles. FEBS Lett. 1980 Dec 1;121(2):327–332. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80374-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang H. W., Bock E. Molecular forms of acetylcholine receptor. Effects of calcium ions and a sulfhydryl reagent on the occurrence of oligomers. Biochemistry. 1977 Oct 4;16(20):4513–4520. doi: 10.1021/bi00639a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claudio T., Ballivet M., Patrick J., Heinemann S. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor gamma subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Feb;80(4):1111–1115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Collier R. J. Diphtheria toxin: mode of action and structure. Bacteriol Rev. 1975 Mar;39(1):54–85. doi: 10.1128/br.39.1.54-85.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Collier R. J., Kandel J. Structure and activity of diphtheria toxin. I. Thiol-dependent dissociation of a fraction of toxin into enzymically active and inactive fragments. J Biol Chem. 1971 Mar 10;246(5):1496–1503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Conti-Tronconi B. M., Raftery M. A. The nicotinic cholinergic receptor: correlation of molecular structure with functional properties. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:491–530. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.002423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Criado M., Hochschwender S., Sarin V., Fox J. L., Lindstrom J. Evidence for unpredicted transmembrane domains in acetylcholine receptor subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Apr;82(7):2004–2008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.7.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalziel A. W., Rollins E. S., McNamee M. G. The effect of cholesterol on agonist-induced flux in reconstituted acetylcholine receptor vesicles. FEBS Lett. 1980 Dec 29;122(2):193–196. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80435-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devillers-Thiery A., Giraudat J., Bentaboulet M., Changeux J. P. Complete mRNA coding sequence of the acetylcholine binding alpha-subunit of Torpedo marmorata acetylcholine receptor: a model for the transmembrane organization of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):2067–2071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.2067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dunn S. M., Conti-Tronconi B. M., Raftery M. A. Acetylcholine receptor dimers are stabilized by extracellular disulfide bonding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1986 Sep 14;139(2):830–837. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(86)80065-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A., Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:321–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Epstein M., Racker E. Reconstitution of carbamylcholine-dependent sodium ion flux and desensitization of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. J Biol Chem. 1978 Oct 10;253(19):6660–6662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Finer-Moore J., Stroud R. M. Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):155–159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Chang J. Y., Changeux J. P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: serine-262 of the delta subunit is labeled by [3H]chlorpromazine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2719–2723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Haumont P. Y., Lederer F., Changeux J. P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: [3H]chlorpromazine labels homologous residues in the beta and delta chains. Biochemistry. 1987 May 5;26(9):2410–2418. doi: 10.1021/bi00383a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Giraudat J., Montecucco C., Bisson R., Changeux J. P. Transmembrane topology of acetylcholine receptor subunits probed with photoreactive phospholipids. Biochemistry. 1985 Jun 18;24(13):3121–3127. doi: 10.1021/bi00334a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guy H. R. A structural model of the acetylcholine receptor channel based on partition energy and helix packing calculations. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):249–261. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84152-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hamilton S. L., McLaughlin M., Karlin A. Disulfide bond cross-linked dimer in acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977 Dec 7;79(3):692–699. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)91167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heidmann T., Sobel A., Popot J. L., Changeux J. P. Reconstitution of a functional acetylcholine receptor. Conservation of the conformational and allosteric transitions and recovery of the permeability response; role of lipids. Eur J Biochem. 1980 Sep;110(1):35–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1980.tb04839.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Henderson R., Unwin P. N. Three-dimensional model of purple membrane obtained by electron microscopy. Nature. 1975 Sep 4;257(5521):28–32. doi: 10.1038/257028a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hucho F., Oberthür W., Lottspeich F. The ion channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is formed by the homologous helices M II of the receptor subunits. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 1;205(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80881-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hucho F. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and its ion channel. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Jul 15;158(2):211–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huganir R. L., Miles K., Greengard P. Phosphorylation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by an endogenous tyrosine-specific protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(22):6968–6972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.22.6968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Imoto K., Methfessel C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Mori Y., Konno T., Fukuda K., Kurasaki M., Bujo H., Fujita Y. Location of a delta-subunit region determining ion transport through the acetylcholine receptor channel. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):670–674. doi: 10.1038/324670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein P., Kanehisa M., DeLisi C. The detection and classification of membrane-spanning proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985 May 28;815(3):468–476. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90375-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. LaPolla R. J., Mayne K. M., Davidson N. Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone for the complete protein coding region of the delta subunit of the mouse acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7970–7974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liao M. J., London E., Khorana H. G. Regeneration of the native bacteriorhodopsin structure from two chymotryptic fragments. J Biol Chem. 1983 Aug 25;258(16):9949–9955. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lindstrom J., Criado M., Hochschwender S., Fox J. L., Sarin V. Immunochemical tests of acetylcholine receptor subunit models. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):573–575. doi: 10.1038/311573a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McCarthy M. P., Earnest J. P., Young E. F., Choe S., Stroud R. M. The molecular neurobiology of the acetylcholine receptor. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:383–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Michel H., Weyer K. A., Gruenberg H., Dunger I., Oesterhelt D., Lottspeich F. The 'light' and 'medium' subunits of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodopseudomonas viridis: isolation of the genes, nucleotide and amino acid sequence. EMBO J. 1986 Jun;5(6):1149–1158. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04340.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Neubig R. R., Krodel E. K., Boyd N. D., Cohen J. B. Acetylcholine and local anesthetic binding to Torpedo nicotinic postsynaptic membranes after removal of nonreceptor peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):690–694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Structural homology of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor subunits. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):528–532. doi: 10.1038/302528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Hirose T., Asai M., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Primary structures of beta- and delta-subunit precursors of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor deduced from cDNA sequences. Nature. 1983 Jan 20;301(5897):251–255. doi: 10.1038/301251a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Oakley B. R., Kirsch D. R., Morris N. R. A simplified ultrasensitive silver stain for detecting proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1980 Jul 1;105(2):361–363. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90470-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Oberthür W., Muhn P., Baumann H., Lottspeich F., Wittmann-Liebold B., Hucho F. The reaction site of a non-competitive antagonist in the delta-subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. EMBO J. 1986 Aug;5(8):1815–1819. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04431.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Popot J. L., Cartaud J., Changeux J. P. Reconstitution of a functional acetylcholine receptor. Incorporation into artificial lipid vesicles and pharmacology of the agonist-controlled permeability changes. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Aug;118(2):203–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Popot J. L., Changeux J. P. Nicotinic receptor of acetylcholine: structure of an oligomeric integral membrane protein. Physiol Rev. 1984 Oct;64(4):1162–1239. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1984.64.4.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Raftery M. A., Schmidt J., Clark D. G. Specificity of -bungarotoxin binding to Torpedo californica electroplax. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1972 Oct;152(2):882–886. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(72)90285-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ratnam M., Lindstrom J. Structural features of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor revealed by antibodies to synthetic peptides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984 Aug 16;122(3):1225–1233. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(84)91223-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ratnam M., Nguyen D. L., Rivier J., Sargent P. B., Lindstrom J. Transmembrane topography of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: immunochemical tests contradict theoretical predictions based on hydrophobicity profiles. Biochemistry. 1986 May 6;25(9):2633–2643. doi: 10.1021/bi00357a052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ratnam M., Sargent P. B., Sarin V., Fox J. L., Nguyen D. L., Rivier J., Criado M., Lindstrom J. Location of antigenic determinants on primary sequences of subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor by peptide mapping. Biochemistry. 1986 May 6;25(9):2621–2632. doi: 10.1021/bi00357a051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sabatini D. D., Kreibich G., Morimoto T., Adesnik M. Mechanisms for the incorporation of proteins in membranes and organelles. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jan;92(1):1–22. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Safran A., Neumann D., Fuchs S. Analysis of acetylcholine receptor phosphorylation sites using antibodies to synthetic peptides and monoclonal antibodies. EMBO J. 1986 Dec 1;5(12):3175–3178. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04626.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sobel A., Weber M., Changeux J. P. Large-scale purification of the acetylcholine-receptor protein in its membrane-bound and detergent-extracted forms from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Eur J Biochem. 1977 Oct 17;80(1):215–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Souroujon M. C., Neumann D., Pizzighella S., Fridkin M., Fuchs S. Mapping of the cAMP-dependent phosphorylation sites on the acetylcholine receptor. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):543–546. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04244.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stroud R. M., Finer-Moore J. Acetylcholine receptor structure, function, and evolution. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:317–351. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.001533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Suarez-Isla B. A., Hucho F. Acetylcholine receptor: SH group reactivity as indicator of conformational changes and functional states. FEBS Lett. 1977 Mar 15;75(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sumikawa K., Houghton M., Smith J. C., Bell L., Richards B. M., Barnard E. A. The molecular cloning and characterisation of cDNA coding for the alpha subunit of the acetylcholine receptor. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Oct 11;10(19):5809–5822. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.19.5809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wennogle L. P., Oswald R., Saitoh T., Changeux J. P. Dissection of the 66 000-dalton subunit of the acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry. 1981 Apr 28;20(9):2492–2497. doi: 10.1021/bi00512a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Young E. F., Ralston E., Blake J., Ramachandran J., Hall Z. W., Stroud R. M. Topological mapping of acetylcholine receptor: evidence for a model with five transmembrane segments and a cytoplasmic COOH-terminal peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):626–630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES