Abstract
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a critical enzyme of folate pathway and required for DNA synthesis and methylation. MTHFE C677T polymorphisms is reported as risk factors for various diseases and disorders like birth defects, metabolic, neurological, psychiatric disorders, and cancers. Several studies have investigated association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and male infertility. To assess the risk associated with MTHFR C677T polymorphism in Asian population, a meta-analysis was performed. Included articles were collected from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science direct up to March 2015. Risk was estimated as pooled odds ratios (ORs) with confidence intervals (CIs) for assessment. Seventeen case–control studies involving 4392 breast infertile males and 3667 fertile males were found suitable for the inclusion in the present meta-analysis. Results showed that the C677T polymorphism was significantly associated with male infertility in Asian population using all the five genetic models (ORT vs. C (allele contrast model) = 1.86, 95% CI 1.7–2.0; ORTT vs. CC (homozygote model) = 1.96, 95% CI 1.67–2.30; ORCT vs. CC (co-dominant model) = 1.40, 95% CI 1.18–1.62; ORTT+CT vs. CC (dominant model) = 1.53, 95% CI 1.30–1.77; ORTT vs. CT+CC (recessive model) = 1.67, 95% CI 1.44–1.92). In conclusion, results of present meta-analysis strongly supported an association between C677T polymorphism and male infertility in Asians.
Keywords: Male infertility, Polymorphism, MTHFR, C677T, Meta-analysis
Introduction
Infertility is very common reproductive problem, which affects approximately 15–20% of couples worldwide. Failure in conceiving a child after 1 year of regular unprotected intercourse is known as infertility. About 50% cases of infertility are due to male factors, especially defect in sperms or semen quality i.e. low sperm count [1–3]. Male infertility is a multifactorial clinical disorder with genetic as well as environmental causes. Several genetic risk factors for male infertility have been reported like aneuploidies, chromosomal translocation, deletions especially Y chromosome microdeletions and gene mutations [4]. About 50% cases of male infertility are idiopathic [3, 5].
Folates are a group of inter-convertible coenzymes, involved in DNA synthesis, methylation and amino acid metabolism. Folate deficiency and related hyperhomocysteinemia is reported as a risk factor for several diseases and disorders including male infertility. Spermatogenesis is a very complex event which is controlled by several genes present on autosomes and Y chromosome [6]. Folate deficiency and polymorphisms of folate pathway genes can influence DNA methylation and gene expression and may contribute to infertility [7].
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a crucial enzyme of folate/homocysteine metabolic pathway. MTHFR reduces the 5–10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to its biologically active form 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, which donates its methyl group for the conversion of homocysteine into methionine [8]. Several polymorphisms in MTHFR gene have been reported [9], out of which only two C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are clinically important and most studied [10]. Frequency of C677T polymorphism varies greatly worldwide [11, 12]. C667T polymorphism is associated with DNA hypomethylation [9] and hyperhomocysteinemia [13]. The MTHFR gene variant is reported to be associated with the risk of certain human diseases, including Down syndrome, congenital heart defects, and pregnancy complications, such as pre-eclampsia, abruptio placentae, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm birth and intrauterine fetal death etc. [14–17].
Several case control association studies have reported that MTHFR gene variants is associated with reduced sperm counts in the human leading to male infertility in some populations [18–23]. During past two decade several case control studies regarding assessment of MTHFR polymorphism as risk factor for male infertility were published and reported controversial results. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to review results of these studies and find out the estimate of association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and male infertility.
Methods
Meta-analysis was carried out according to MOOSE guidelines [24].
Search Strategy and Identification of Studies
Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier and Springer link databases. Following search terms were used: “MTHFR”, “methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase”, “C677T”, and “polymorphism” in combination with “male infertility” up to March 2015.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies should: 1) be original and published, 2) used case control approach and evaluated association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and male infertility and 3) be reported genotype number/frequency of cases and controls, and if not, the text provided data enabling such calculations.
Studies were excluded if: (1) their sample was not independent from that investigated in another study, (2) incomplete raw data/information and not providing complete information for number of genotype and/or allele number calculation, (3) studies based on pedigree and (4) review, letter to editors and book chapters. If more than one study was published using the same dataset, the most recent study, or the study with the larger sample size, was selected.
Data Extraction
The following information was extracted from the each identified studies: the first author family name, year of publication, sample size, country name, ethnicity, genotyping method, the numbers of patients and controls, and MTHFR C677T genotypes information and frequencies of alleles in all study. If important information was not given in the article, the relevant information was obtained by contacting authors.
Statistical Analysis
The strength of association between the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR and autism risk was estimated by the odds ratio (OR) along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was examined with the χ2 test-based Q statistics [25] and p < 0.05 was considered significant. To quantify heterogeneity, ‘I2’ index was used, which calculated as the percentage of the total variability in a set of effect sizes due to true heterogeneity [26] and ‘I2’ > 50% is considered high heterogenity [27]. Fixed and random-effects summary ORs were calculated using the Mantel–Haenszel and DerSimonian and Laird methods [28, 29], random-effects summary ORs was used, when there is higher heterogeneity. The pooled ORs were performed for the allele contrasts/additive model (T vs. C), homozygote model (TT vs. CC), recessive model (TT vs. CT + CC), dominant model (TT + CT vs. CC), and co-dominant/heterozygote model (CT vs. CC). Control population of each study was tested for Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) using the χ2 test.
Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the results by removing the studies not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and studies with small sample size. Cumulative meta-analysis was performed to see the effect of subsequent addition of each study. The publication bias was evaluated by a Begg’s test and Egger’s linear regression test [30, 31]. All statistical analysis was undertaken using the program MIX version 1.7 [32]. P values were two-tailed with a significance level of 0.05.
Results
Characteristics of Included Studies
Seventeen studies were found suitable for the inclusion in the present meta-analysis [3, 7, 20, 22, 33–45]. The studies were published between 2005 and 2015. The number of cases varied from 75 [41] to 637 [3], and the number of controls varied from 52 [35] to 396 [22]. The studies were carried out in China [34–36, 38, 41, 42, 44, 45], India [3, 7, 33, 37, 40], Iran [39, 43] and Korea [20, 22].
In all seventeen studies, total number of infertile cases were 4392 with CC (1,961), CT (1,714) and TT (717), and number of fertile controls were 3667 with CC (1,919), CT (1,362), and TT (386; Table 1). In case genotypes percentage of CC, CT and TT were 44.65, 39.0 and 16.32% respectively. In controls genotype percentages of CC, CT and TT were 52.33, 37.14 and 10.53% respectively. Frequencies of CC genotype and C allele were highest in both cases and controls.
Table 1.
Characteristics of seventeen studies included in the present meta-analysis
| References | Country | Case/control | Case genotypes CC/CT/TT | Control genotypes CC/CT/TT | p value (HWE) | Quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singh et al. [33] | India | 151/200 | 105/40/6 | 163/37/0 | 0.15 | 6 |
| Park et al. [22] | Korea | 373/396 | 105/205/63 | 145/200/51 | 0.16 | 6 |
| Lee et al. [20] | Korea | 360/225 | 115/181/64 | 118/66/41 | 0.00 | 6 |
| Yang et al. [34] | China | 355/252 | 130/160/65 | 128/95/29 | 0.08 | 6 |
| Dhillon et al. [7] | India | 179/200 | 81/77/21 | 70/100/30 | 0.55 | 5 |
| Sun et al. [35] | China | 182/53 | 27/86/69 | 15/28/10 | 0.63 | 5 |
| Yang et al. [36] | China | 131/293 | 34/55/42 | 98/142/53 | 0.90 | 5 |
| Gupta et al. [37] | India | 522/315 | 378/116/28 | 251/58/6 | 0.22 | 5 |
| Qiu et al. [38] | China | 271/180 | 75/112/84 | 63/85/32 | 0.72 | 6 |
| Safarinejad et al. [39] | Iran | 164/328 | 58/80/26 | 144/148/36 | 0.82 | 6 |
| Vani et al. [40] | India | 206/230 | 158/42/6 | 188/42/0 | 0.13 | 6 |
| Liu et al. [41] | China | 75/72 | 27/38/10 | 40/28/4 | 0.75 | 7 |
| Pei [42] | China | 290/90 | 39/138/113 | 24/47/19 | 0.65 | 7 |
| Karimian and Colagar [43] | Iran | 118/132 | 51/59/8 | 77/52/3 | 0.08 | 6 |
| Li et al. [44] | China | 82/133 | 14/36/32 | 36/61/36 | 0.34 | 6 |
| Naqvi et al. [3] | India | 637/364 | 447/154/36 | 275/79/10 | 0.144 | 5 |
| Ni et al. [45] | China | 296/204 | 117/135/44 | 84/94/26 | 0.97 | 5 |
Meta-Analysis
Table 2 summarizes the ORs with corresponding 95% CIs for association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of male infertility in allele contrast, dominant, recessive, homozygote and co-dominant models. Meta-analysis with allele contrast showed significant association between 677T allele and male infertility with both fixed effect (ORT vs. C = 1.86; 95% CI 1.7–2.0; p < 0.0001) and random effect model (ORT vs. C = 1.99; 95% CI 1.58–2.51; p < 0.0001; Fig. 1).
Table 2.
Summary estimates for the odds ratio (OR) of MTHFR C677T in various allele/genotype contrasts, the significance level (p value) of heterogeneity test (Q test), and the I2 metric and publication bias p value (Egger test)
| Genetic models | Fixed effect OR (95% CI), p | Random effect OR (95% CI), p | Heterogeneity p value (Q test) | I2 (%) | Publication bias (p value of Egger’s test) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allele Contrast (T vs. C) | 1.86 (1.7–2.00), <0.0001 | 1.99 (1.58–2.51), <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 89.43 | 0.21 |
| Co-dominant (CT vs. CC) | 1.4 (1.24–1.52), <0.0001 | 1.40 (1.18–1.62), <0.0001 | 0.005 | 52.67 | 0.59 |
| Homozygote (TT vs. CC) | 1.96 (1.67–2.30), <0.0001 | 2.1 (1.61–2.61), <0.0001 | 0.02 | 47.35 | 0.02 |
| Dominant (TT + CT vs. CC) | 1.5 (1.35–1.65), <0.0001 | 1.53 (1.3–1.77), <0.0001 | 0.005 | 53.68 | 0.28 |
| Recessive (TT vs. CT + CC) | 1.67 (1.44–1.92), <0.0001 | 1.70 (1.38–2.1), <0.0001 | 0.03 | 43.73 | 0.014 |
Fig. 1.
Random effect forest plot of allele contrast model (T vs. C) of MTHFR C677T polymorphism
An increased significant association was found between male infertility and mutant genotype (TT vs. CC; homozygote model) with both fixed (ORTT vs. CC = 1.96; 95% CI 1.67–2.30, p < 0.0001) and random (ORTT vs. CC = 2.1; 95% CI 1.61–2.61, p < 0.0001) effect models (Table 2; Fig. 2). Association of mutant heterozygous genotype (CT vs.CC; co-dominant model) was observed significant with male infertility using fixed (ORCT vs. CC = 1.40; 95% CI 1.24–1.52; p < 0.0001) and random (ORCT vs. CC = 1.40; 95% CI 1.18–1.62; p < 0.0001) effect models (Table 2). Combined mutant genotypes (TT + CT vs. CC; dominant model) showed positive association with male infertility using both fixed (ORTT+CT vs. CC = 1.50; 95% CI 1.35–1.65; p < 0.0001) and random (ORTT+CT vs. CC = 1.53; 95% CI 1.30–1.77; p < 0.0001) effect models. Similarly the recessive genotypes model (TT vs. CT + CC) also showed positive association fixed (ORTT vs. CT+CC = 1.67; 95% CI 1.44–1.92; p < 0.0001) and random (ORTT vs. CT+CC = 1.70; 95% CI 1.38–2.1; p < 0.0001) effect models (Table 2).
Fig. 2.
Random effect forest plot of homozygote model (TT vs. CC) of MTHFR C677T polymorphism
A true heterogeneity existed between studies for allele contrast (Pheterogeneity < 0.0001, Q = 151.38, I2 = 89.43%, t2 = 0.2098, z = 5.80), co-dominant (Pheterogeneity = 0.005, Q = 33.80, I2 = 52.67%, t2 = 0.055, z = 4.08), and dominant (Pheterogeneity = 0.005, Q = 34.54, I2 = 53.68%, t2 = 0.05, z = 5.50) comparisons.
Publication Bias
Except homozygote (Egger’s p = 0.02) and recessive models, publication bias was not observed in three genetic models (Egger’s p = 0.21. for T vs. C; Egger’s p = 0.59 for CT vs. CC; Egger’s p = 0.28 for TT + CT vs. CC; Table 2; Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Funnel plots of precision by log odds ratio for allele contrast model
Discussion
MTHFR plays an important role in folate and homocysteine metabolism, and tHcy levels could affect DNA synthesis and methylation. DNA methylation and DNA synthesis have important effects on spermatogenesis [46–48]. There are several experimental evidences that key enzymes of folate pathway are essential for spermatogenesis and gene polymorphism of these enzymes especially MTHFR coupled with folate deficiency can alter nucleotide synthesis and may cause infertility.
The role of MTHFR C677T polymorphism in male infertility is not clearly understood but it may be explained by homocysteine hypothesis. Variant MTHFR enzyme less efficiently convert homocysteine into methionine and increase concentration of homocysteine [13]. Methionine is essential for the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which is the main methyl donor for DNA methylation. Adequate SAM is required for cellular methylation reactions like DNA, RNA, protein and lipid methylation. C677T polymorphism causes global DNA hypomethylation. DNA hypomethylation affected expression of genes involved in spermatogenesis [49]. Further higher concentration of homocysteine increased oxidative stress and causes DNA damage [50] and mis-incorporation of uracil in DNA repair during spermatogenesis. Sperm chromatin structure and DNA integrity have a critical role in the fertilization process [7]. In addition, hyperhomocysteinemia also reduced testicular blood flow due to vascular disease [10, 13, 51, 52].
Meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of a large collection of analysis results for the purpose of integrating the findings and it is a powerful tool for systematic review of a focused topic in the literature that provides a quantitative estimate for the effect of a gene [53]. Several meta-analyses illustrate the utility of meta-analytic techniques in identification of risk association of folate pathway gene polymorphism with disease/disorders like- Down syndrome [54, 55], neural tube defects [56], orofacial clefts [57], recurrent pregnancy loss [58], psychiatric diseases [59–62], Alzheimer’s disease [63], breast cancer [64–66], lung cancer [67] and prostate cancer [68] etc.
Finally, despite the clear strengths of present meta-analysis, including relatively large sample sizes and lack of publication bias, the interpretation should be done in light of few limitations like- (1) used crude ORs in the pooled analysis without adjustment, (2) some studies with small sample sizes were also included, (3) presence of significant heterogeneity in overall meta-analysis, (4) single gene polymorphism was considered, (5) stratified analysis by other related susceptible factors, such as diet, infection, smoking, alcohol etc. have not been conducted due to unavailability of sufficient data, and (6) gene–environment interactions were not considered.
In conclusion, the results of present meta-analysis suggested that MTHFR C677T polymorphism is a risk factor for male infertility in Asian population [T vs. C: OR = 1.99 (1.58–2.51)]. Future well designed large studies with more studies and larger sample size might be necessary to validate this association in different populations including other risk factors in the susceptibility of male infertility.
Acknowledgement
The author is highly grateful to Leon Bax (Chief Scientific Officer at BiostatXL, UMC Utrecht) for his valuable suggestions, which help in statistical analysis.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Hull MG, Glazener CM, Kelly NJ, Conway DI, Foster PA, Hinton RA, et al. Population study of causes, treatment, and outcome of infertility. Br Med J. 1985;291:1693–1697. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6510.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Kretser DM. Male infertility. Lancet. 1997;349:787–790. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)08341-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Naqvi H, Hussain SR, Ahmad MK, Mahdi F, Jaiswar SP, Shankhwar SN, et al. Role of 677C → T polymorphism a single substitution in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene in North Indian infertile men. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41:573–579. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2894-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dohle GR, Halley DJ, Van Hemel JO, van den Ouwel AM, Pieters MH, Weber RF, Govaerts LC. Genetic risk factors in infertile men with severe oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3–16. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Filipponi D, Feil R. Perturbation of genomic imprinting in oligozoospermia. Epigenetics. 2009;4(1):27–30. doi: 10.4161/epi.4.1.7311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh K, Jaiswal D. One-carbon metabolism, spermatogenesis, and male infertility. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:622–630. doi: 10.1177/1933719112459232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dhillon VS, Shahid M, Husain SA. Associations of MTHFR DNMT3b 4977 bp deletion in mtDNA and GSTM1 deletion, and aberrant CpG island hypermethylation of GSTM1 in non-obstructive infertility in Indian men. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13:213–222. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gal118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lucock M. Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;71:121–138. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2000.3027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castro R, Rivera I, Ravasco P, Camilo ME, Jakobs C, Blom HJ, et al. 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T and 1298A/C mutations are associated with DNA hypomethylation. J Med Genet. 2004;41:454–458. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2003.017244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Mathews RG, et al. A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet. 1995;10:111–113. doi: 10.1038/ng0595-111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rai V, Yadav U, Kumar P, Yadav SK. Methyleletetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism (C677T) in Muslim population of Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Ind J Med Sci. 2010;64(5):219–223. doi: 10.4103/0019-5359.98949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rai V, Yadav U, Kumar P. Genotype prevalence and allele frequencies of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T mutation in two caste groups of India. Cell Mol Biol. 2012;58:OL1695–OL1701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jacques PF, Bostom AG, Williams RR, Ellison RC, Eckfeldt JH, Rosenberg IH, et al. Relation between folate status, a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, and plasma homocysteine concentrations. Circulation. 1996;93:7–9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hobbs CA, Sherman SL, Hopkins SE, Torfs CP, Hine RJ, Pogribna M, et al. Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism as maternal risk factors for down syndrome. Hum Genet. 2000;67:623–630. doi: 10.1086/303055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hobbs CA, Cleves MA, Karim MA, Zhao W, MacLeod S. Maternal folate-related gene environment interactions and congenital heart defects. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:316–322. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e80979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nelen WL. Hyperhomocysteinaemia and human reproduction. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2001;39:758–763. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2001.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tamura T, Picciano MF. Folate and human reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:993–1016. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bezold G, Lange M, Peter RU. Homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T mutation and male infertility. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1172–1173. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104123441517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ebisch IM, van Heerde WL, Thomas CM, van der Put N, Wong WY, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism interferes with the effects of folic acid and zinc sulfate on sperm concentration. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1190–1194. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02157-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee HC, Jeong YM, Lee SH, Cha KY, Song SH, Kim NK, et al. Association study of four polymorphisms in three folate-related enzyme genes with non-obstructive male infertility. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3162–3170. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stuppia L, Gatta V, Scarciolla O, Colosimo A, Guanciali-Franchi P, Calabrese G, et al. The methylenetethrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and male infertility in Italy. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26:620–622. doi: 10.1007/BF03347018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Park JH, Lee HC, Jeong YM, Chung TG, Kim HJ, Kim NK, et al. MTHFR C677T polymorphism associates with unexplained infertile male factors. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2005;22:361–368. doi: 10.1007/s10815-005-6795-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ravel C, Chantot-Bastaraud S, Chalmey C, Barreiro L, Aknin-Seifer I, Pfeffer J, et al. Lack of association between genetic polymorphisms in enzymes associated with folate metabolism and unexplained reduced sperm counts. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:820–826. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-9-199711010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Whitehead A. Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Chichester: Wiley; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101. doi: 10.2307/2533446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bax L, Yu LM, Ikeda N, Tsuruta H, Moons KG. Development and validation of MIX: comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Singh K, Singh SK, Sah R, Singh I, Raman R. Mutation C677T in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with male infertility in an Indian population. Int J Androl. 2005;28:115–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2004.00513.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang Y, Zhang SZ, Li N, Zhang W. Single nucleotide polymorphism C677T in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene might be a genetic risk factor for infertility for Chinese men with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2007;9:57–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00225.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun HT, Zhang JY, Lu YJ. Association of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism with male infertility. Reprod Contracept. 2007;27(7):443–446. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang BH, Peng GF, Pi JP. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism with asthenospermia in Han population of South Anhui. Acta Acad Med Wannan. 2010;29(1):5–7. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gupta N, Gupta S, Dama M, David A, Khanna G, Khanna A, et al. Strong association of 677 C > T substitution in the MTHFR gene with male infertility—a study on an Indian population and a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e22277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Qiu XF, Hu XP, Li YJ, Dang J, Peng L, Xu X, et al. Association between methyIenterahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism and male infertility with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia and asthenospermia in Ningxia Han Population. J Ningxia Med Univ. 2011;33(7):625–628. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Safarinejad MR, Shafiei N, Safarinejad S. Relationship between genetic polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (C677T, A1298C, and G1793A) as risk factors for idiopathic male infertility. Reprod Sci. 2011;18:304–315. doi: 10.1177/1933719110385135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vani GT, Mukesh N, Rama Devi P, Usha Rani P, Reddy PP. Methylenetetrahydro folate reductase C677T polymorphism is not associated with male infertility in a South Indian population. Andrologia. 2012;44:252–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu L, Cai Z, Leng HM, Qian WP. Association of MTHFR C677T and MS A2756G polymorphism with semen quality. J Cent South Univ (Med Sci) 2011;37:1054–1059. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pei J. Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and male infertility in Han population of He Nan China. China Health Care Nutr. 2013;7:629–630. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Karimian M, Colagar AH. Association of C677T transition of the human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene with male infertility. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28(6):785–794. doi: 10.1071/RD14186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li SS, Li J, Xiao Z, Ren AG, Jin L. Prospective study of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms as a possible etiology of male infertility. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(3):6367–6374. doi: 10.4238/2014.March.24.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ni W, Li H, Wu A, Zhang P, Yang H, Yang X, et al. Lack of association between genetic polymorphisms in three folate-related enzyme genes and male infertility in the Chinese population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(3):369–374. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0423-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tanaka H, Fujisawa M, Okada H, Arakawa S, Kamidono S. DNA synthesis in the testes of infertile men with varicocele—image cytometeric analysis of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;87:885–891. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.87.885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Doerksen T, Benoit G, Trasler JM. Deoxyribonucleic acid hypomethylation of male germ cells by mitotic and meiotic exposure to 5- azacytidine is associated with altered testicular histology. Endocrinology. 2000;141:3235–3244. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.9.7661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kelly TL, Li E, Trasler JM. 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine induces alterations in murine spermatogenesis and pregnancy outcome. J Androl. 2003;24:822–830. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb03133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Li E. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;3:662–673. doi: 10.1038/nrg887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hideya K, Raizo Y, Jun F, Hiroshi K, Toshinobu T. Increased oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage in the spermatozoa of infertile male patients. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:519–524. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00236-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Klein R, Pfitzer P. Flow cytometry of post-mortem human testicular tissue in cases of atherosclerosis. Cytometry. 1984;5:636–643. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990050613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zetterberg H. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and transcobalamin genetic polymorphisms in human spontaneous abortion: biological and clinical implications. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004;2:7–14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-2-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Munafo MR, Flint J. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Trends Genet. 2004;20:439–444. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rai V. Polymorphism in folate metabolic pathway gene as maternal risk factor for down syndrome. Int J Biol Med Res. 2011;2(4):1055–1060. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rai V, Yadav U, Kumar P, Yadav SK, Mishra OP. Maternal methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and down syndrome risk: a meta-analysis from 34 studies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yadav U, Kumar P, Yadav SK, Mishra OP, Rai V. Polymorphisms in folate metabolism genes as maternal risk factor for neural tube defects: an updated meta-analysis. Metab Brain Dis. 2015;30(1):7–24. doi: 10.1007/s11011-014-9575-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rai V. Maternal methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene A1298C polymorphism and risk of nonsyndromic Cleft lip and/or Palate (NSCL/P) in offspring: a meta-analysis. Asian J Med Sci. 2014;6(1):16–21. doi: 10.3126/ajms.v6i1.10281. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rai V. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene A1298C polymorphism and susceptibility to recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Cell Mol Biol. 2014;60:27–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rai V. Evaluation of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variant (C677T) as risk factor for bipolar disorder. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2011;57(1):OL1558–OL1566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yadav U, Kumar P, Gupta S, Rai V. Role of MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism in the susceptibility of schizophrenia: an updated meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatry. 2016;20:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rai V. Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene C677T polymorphism with autism: evidence of genetic susceptibility. Metab Brain Dis. 2016;31:727–735. doi: 10.1007/s11011-016-9815-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rai V. Genetic polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and susceptibility to depression in Asian population: a systematic meta-analysis. Cell Mol Biol. 2014;60(3):29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rai V. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and alzheimer disease risk: a meta-analysis. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9722-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kumar P, Yadav U, Rai V. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk: evidence for genetic susceptibility. Meta Gene. 2015;6:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rai V. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 33 studies. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(6):841–851. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.144873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rai V. The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Asian populations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:5853–5860. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.14.5853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rai V. Folate pathway gene MTHFR C677T polymorphism and risk of lung cancer in Asian Populations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(21):9259–9264. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yadav U, Kumar P, Rai V. Role of MTHFR A1298C gene polymorphism in the etiology of prostate cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2016;17(2):141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmhg.2015.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]



