Abstract
Secretagogin (SCGN), a hexa EF-hand calcium binding protein, plays key roles in insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. It is not yet understood how the binding of Ca2+ to human SCGN (hSCGN) promotes secretion. Here we have addressed this question, using mass spectrometry combined with a disulfide searching algorithm DBond. We found that the binding of Ca2+ to hSCGN promotes the dimerization of hSCGN via the formation of a Cys193-Cys193 disulfide bond. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) and molecular dynamics studies revealed that Ca2+ binding to the EF-hands of hSCGN induces significant structural changes that affect the solvent exposure of N-terminal region, and hence the redox sensitivity of the Cys193 residue. These redox sensitivity changes were confirmed using biotinylated methyl-3-nitro-4-(piperidin-1-ylsulfonyl) benzoate (NPSB-B), a chemical probe that specifically labels reactive cysteine sulfhydryls. Furthermore, we found that wild type hSCGN overexpression promotes insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells, while C193S-hSCGN inhibits it. These findings suggest that insulin secretion in pancreatic cells is regulated by Ca2+ and ROS signaling through Ca2+-induced structural changes promoting dimerization of hSCGN.
Introduction
Secretagogin (SCGN) is a Ca2+ sensor protein that possesses six EF-hand helix-loop-helix calcium binding motifs. Scgn, originally cloned from pancreatic β cells1, is expressed selectively in pancreatic β cells and neuroendocrine cells1, as well as at distinct neurosecretory loci in the brain2, 3. SCGN controls stress hormone release2 and olfactory neuron differentiation in Alzheimer’s disease4. Recently, we reported that SCGN also plays crucial roles in insulin secretion in pancreatic β cells by interacting with vesicle fusion and trafficking proteins1, 5 or with actin cytoskeleton6. We also showed that SCGN regulates focal adhesion by regulating the actin cytoskeleton during insulin secretion. SCGN physically interacts with actin and this interaction is increased by H2O2 and glucose stimulation, indicating that Ca2+ and reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulate the interaction between SCGN and actin. ROS responsive insulin secretion was diminished by silencing SCGN which further indicates that SCGN mediates Ca2+ and ROS signaling in insulin secretion.
In pancreatic β cells, intracellular Ca2+ and ROS are known to play key roles in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) by regulating intracellular signaling and nutrient sensing, coupling glucose metabolism to insulin secretion7–11. Subtle changes in Ca2+ signaling affect β-cell physiology and the pathogenesis of diabetes. Ca2+ signaling is mainly mediated by Ca2+ binding proteins, one of which is SCGN12. SCGN has a low Ca2+ affinity and functions as a Ca2+ sensor protein, controling protein-protein interactions and cellular signaling via conformational changes13, 14. ROS induce oxidative modifications, including reversible disulfide bonds, and structural and functional changes that modulate the signaling activity of proteins15. Dimerization of re-folded recombinant SCGN, possibly due to oxidation, has been reported16, raising the possibility of physiological redox regulation of SCGN. Recently it was reported that SCGN is a redox sensitive Ca2+ sensor, and that this dimerization and Ca2+ binding increase the stability of SCGN17, 18. However, the structural regulation and functional implication of Ca2+ binding and dimer formation of SCGN remain to be elucidated.
An x-ray structure of the calcium-free Danio rerio SCGN monomer (apo-SCGN) has been determined, but not that of SCGN in the presence of Ca2+ 19. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange monitored by mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) provides a complementary method for investigating structural change to x-ray crystallography. In previous work employing HDX-MS, we identified structural changes in the NDP kinase protein (Nm23-H1) caused by stepwise oxidation20. Here we report on HDX-MS studies on the structural changes in human SCGN (hSCGN) to see how its Ca2+ binding might affect its structure and impact upon insulin secretion. We validated these findings by molecular modeling of Ca2+ bound hSCGN. Our findings indicate that Ca2+ binding promotes the formation of stable dimers of hSCGN in the presence of ROS, and suggest that this dimerization is necessary for SCGN to promote insulin secretion.
Methods
Reagents and plasmids
ViaFECT transfection reagent: Promega (Madison, WC, USA), Effectene transfection reagent: QIAGEN (Valencia, CA, USA), Insulin ELISA kit: ALPCO (Windham, NH, USA), BCA protein assay: Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA). For expression in mammalian cells, the constructs encoding pcDNA3.1 Human SCGN WT, mutants C193S, C253S, C269S and ΔEF1 (a.a.: Δ1-52) were generated by cloning and mutation using the pcDNA3.1 myc his (−) A vector and an SCGN cDNA clone obtained from human cDNA library as a template. All plasmid constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Constructs and protein purification
pGEX-1λT-hScgn was provided from Dr. Ludwig Wagner (Univ. of Vienna, Austria). Mutant hSCGN C193S, C253S and C269S were generated using the Quik-Change®II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using pGEX-1λT-Scgn as a template. The mutagenesis oligonucleotides used were the following: for mutation C193S, sense primer 5′-TTCTCCAATTTAAAATGGATGCTAGTTCTACTGAAGAAAGGAAAAGG-3′, antisense primer 5′-CCTTTTCCTTTCTTCAGTAGAACTAGCATCCATTTTAAATTGGAGAA-3′; for mutation C253S, sense primer 5′-ATTCTCCTGCGTCACAGCGACGTGAACAAGG-3′, and antisense primer 5′-CCTTGTTCACGTCGCTGTGACGCAGGAGAAT-3′; for mutation C269S, sense primer 5′-AGTCTGAGCTGGCTTTGAGTCTTGGGCTGAAAATC-3′, and antisense primer 5′-GATTTTCAGCCCAAGAC TCAAAGCCAGCTCAGACT-3′ (mutated codons are underlined). Construct integrity was validated by DNA sequencing.
A pGEX-1λT plasmid carrying the human Scgn gene was expressed in BL21 (DE3) E. coli cells. The bacteria were cultured in LB medium at 37 °C, and recombinant fusion protein production was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). After 4 h of additional incubation at 37°C, the cells were harvested and lysed by vortexing with lysozyme containing hSCGN purification buffer (lysozyme, protease inhibitor, 5 mM DTT, 10 mM EDTA in PBS) on ice. The soluble protein fraction was recovered by centrifugation at 60,000 g for 1 h at 4°C. The GST-fused recombinant proteins in the supernatant were purified by chromatography on a glutathione-agarose column followed by washing, and equilibration by hSCGN elution buffer (140 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4). To cleave hSCGN from the GST-hSCGN, the beads were incubated overnight at room temperature with thrombin in SCGN elution buffer. After 24 h, the purified hSCGN was eluted and quantity was measured.
Cell culture and transfection
HeLa cells were purchased from ATCC and cultured in EMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 units/mL penicillin G at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air. NIT-1 insulinoma cells were maintained in 5.6 mM glucose DMEM supplemented with FBS and antibiotics as above. For transient overexpression of specific proteins in HeLa cells, cells were transfected using Effectene and analyzed at 24 h post transfection. For NIT-1 cells, the cells were transfected using ViaFECT and analyzed at 48 h post transfection according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Disulfide analysis of SCGN using nanoUPLC-ESI-q-TOF tandem MS and DBonds algorithm
The peptides resulting from trypsin-digested protein in non-reducing gel were resuspended in 10% acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid and analyzed using nanoAcquity™ UPLC™/ESI/MS (SYNAPT™ HDMS™, Waters Co. UK) as described previously6. Tandem MS (MS/MS) spectra were matched against amino acid sequences in the SwissProt human database (version 57.8., 20401 entries) using DBond (https://prix.hanyang.ac.kr).
NPSB-B label
Methods for the labeling of reactive cysteine residues by NPSB-B were previously reported21. Briefly 2 μg of recombinant hSCGN was pre-incubated with/without Ca2+ at room temperature for 15 min followed by incubation with NPSB-B (final concentration 1 mM) at room temperature for 2 h. Proteins were separated by 12% SDS PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Labeled proteins were detected by streptavidin-HRP. The amount of total loaded protein was detected by Coomassie staining.
Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS)
1 µL hSCGN (1 mg/mL) was diluted 19-fold with labeling buffer (10 mM HEPES in D2O, pH 7.4) and incubated at 25°C for10, 60, 300, 1800, or 10800 s. The deuterium labeling reaction was quenched by 2.5 mM tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (TCEP), formic acid, pH 2.3. For protein digestion, 1 μg of porcine pepsin was added to each quenched protein sample and incubated on ice for 3 min before injection. Peptic peptides were desalted on C18 trap column cartridge (Waters, UK) and gradient eluted from 8% CH3CN to 40% CH3CN, 0.1% formic acid on 100 µm i.d. × 100 mm analytical column, 1.7 µm particle size, BEH130 C18, (Waters, UK) for 7 min. The trap, analytical column and all tubing were immersed in an ice bath to minimize deuterium back-exchange. Gradient chromatography was performed at a flow rate 0.5 μL/min and was sprayed on line to a nanoAcquityTM/ESI/MS (SYNAPTTM HDMSTM) (Waters, UK). The extent of deuterium incorporation was monitored by the increase in mass of the isotope distribution for each identified peptide, and calculated using Microsoft Excel. The theoretical maximum deuterium incorporation value was calculated for each peptide based on the number of exchangeable amides20. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Deuterated peptides were calculated by DynamX v3.
Model building and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation
The MODELLER 9.9 program (http://salilab.org/modeller/) was used to generate homology models of hSCGN. The 3D structure of SCGN from Danio Rerio (PDB ID: 2BE4)19 which has high sequence identity to hSCGN (~70%) was used as a template. A Ca2+-bound hSCGN structure was manually constructed with COOT22. Six Ca2+ ions were added to each potent EF-hand loop (Supplementary Table S2)23 and the complex was energy minimized in SYBYL-X 2.1. The modeled structures of hSCGN and Ca2+-bound hSCGN were used for the MD simulations. Each coordinate was solvated in water molecules and ionized with NaCl to a final equivalent concentration of 150 mM in order to neutralize charge. All MD simulations were performed with the NAMD 2.9 package using the CHARMM27 force field for proteins with the CMAP correction and the TIP3P model for water24. Each system was energy-minimized in two phases totaling 10,000 minimization steps. Water molecules and ions were relaxed in the 5,000 minimization steps and then protein was relaxed in the next 5,000 minimization steps. The minimized systems were heated to 300 K gradually and equilibrated at 300 K. After equilibration, MD simulations were performed for 40 ns in an NPT ensemble using 2 fs integration step. The Nosé-Hoover-Langevin piston method25 and Langevin dynamics were used for pressure control at 1 atm and temperature control at 300 K, respectively. Snapshots of the hSCGN and Ca2+-bound hSCGN trajectories were output every 10 ps and the 4000 structures from these trajectories were analyzed using VMD26 and Xmgrace27.
Insulin secretion assay
Insulin secreted into the medium was measured using Mouse Ultrasensitive Insulin ELISA kit (ALPCO) following the manufacturer’s protocol. NIT-1 cells were starved at 37°C for 2 h with glucose-free HBSS (137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.26 mM CaCl2, 0.98 mM MgSO4, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 0.36 mM Na2HPO4, 4.2 mM NaHCO3 (pH 7.4)) containing 0.1% BSA. After glucose starvation, the cells were stimulated at 37 °C for 25 min with HBSS containing 16.8 mM D-glucose. Secreted insulin was normalized to cellular total protein concentration, measured by a BCA protein assay performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Size exclusion chromatography
450 µg of protein was loaded on a SuperdexTM 200 HR 10/30 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with PBS. The column was eluted at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, and proteins were fractionated using FPLC (AKTA Explorer) into 15 fractions of 0.5 mL each. Proteins used as molecular weight markers were albumin (66.4 kDa) and α-lactalbumin (14.2 kDa).
Immunoprecipitation from cell extracts
MDA-MB 231 cells were lysed with lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl, 60 mM octyl β-D-glucopyranoside, pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitors for 30 min on ice. The cell lysates were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was incubated with anti-SCGN antibody for 2 h and then with protein G Sepharose beads for 1 h at 4°C. The beads were washed three times with 1 mL of lysis buffer and additionally twice with 1 mL of lysis buffer without detergent. The immune complex was solubilized in SDS gel sample buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE, and visualized by silver staining or Western analysis.
Subcelluar fractionation
Cells (70–80% confluent in 100 mm dishes) were washed and collected by scraping into ice-cold PBS, pelleted by centrifugation at 4°C, resuspended in hypotonic buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 100 μM Na3VO4), and a mixture of protease inhibitors (Roche) for 15 min on ice and disrupted using 32-gauge syringes. Crude nuclear fractions were pelleted by 5000 rpm for 10 min centrifugation at 4 °C, and supernatants were separated by 40,000 rpm for 1 h centrifugation at 4°C to cytosol (supernatants) and membrane (pellets).
Results and Discussion
Calcium ion binding promotes ROS-induced dimerization of hSCGN
In order to understand how hSCGN changes following Ca2+ binding, we first examined the electrophoretic mobility of recombinant hSCGN. Since SCGN is known to be partially oxidized during purification, by forming dimers through intermolecular disulfide bonds28, we investigated whether Ca2+ binding affects the dimerization of hSCGN. When recombinant hSCGN was incubated with CaCl2, small amounts of dimeric hSCGN were observed (Supplementary Fig. S1A), and the amount increased with incubation with H2O2 and Ca2+ (Fig. 1A). These findings indicate that Ca2+ and ROS synergize in the promotion of hSCGN dimerization. To further investigate the oligomerization state of hSCGN, the molecular mass of hSCGN after Ca2+ and H2O2 treatments were assessed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Samples were pretreated with EGTA and DTT to diminish dimerization due the possible effects of trace amounts of Ca2+ and air during the purification procedures. In the presence of Ca2+, H2O2 produced stable disulfide-linked dimers, while in the absence of Ca2+, less dimerization and more non-specific high molecular weight species were observed (Supplementary Fig. S1B). These results suggest that Ca2+ promotes the formation of a specific dimer by reducing non-specific high molecular weight oligomers, and that H2O2 is the driving force behind dimer formation.
These in vitro findings were validated in HeLa cells, which do not express endogenous hSCGN (Supplementary Fig. S1C), and confirmed by ProteinAtlas database search, (http://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000079689-SCGN/cell), which showed SCGN mRNA was not detected in HeLa cells. When HeLa cells transfected with hSCGN were exposed to various concentrations of H2O2, the overexpressed hSCGN was found to dimerize in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. S1D). H2O2-induced hSCGN dimerization was increased by treatment of the cells with ionomycin, an agent that raises intracellular Ca2+ levels (Supplementary Fig. S1E). The effects of Ca2+ and oxidative stress on SCGN dimerization were also assessed in NIT-1 cells, a mouse insulinoma cell line expressing SCGN endogenously. We treated NIT-1 cells overexpressing SCGN with ionomycin, followed by H2O2 at previously determined optimal doses for NIT-1 cells6. SCGN was found to be dimerized and oligomerized by treatment with both ionomycin and H2O2 (Fig. 1B). These results show that Ca2+ binding enhances the H2O2-induced dimerization of hSCGN in both cell lines.
Calcium ion-stimulated dimerization of hSCGN involves the formation of a Cys193-Cys193 inter-disulfide bond
Recombinant hSCGN was again pre-treated with DTT and EDTA to minimize background levels of dimerization due to traces of Ca2+ and the air environment. Supplementary Fig. S2A shows that uniform stable hSCGN dimerization was enhanced by H2O2 treatment of Ca2+-bound hSCGN, while several upper and lower bands representing non-specific crosslinking were detected in the absence of Ca2+. hSCGN possesses three highly conserved cysteine residues at Cys193, Cys253 and Cys269 (Supplementary Fig. S3A). We identified the disulfide linkages in hSCGN promoted by Ca2+ and H2O2 treatments, employing peptide sequencing with nanoUPLC-ESI-q-TOF mass spectrometry and the DBond disulfide searching algorithm, a unique algorithm for analysis of disulfide linkages directly in tandem mass spectra28. Disulfide linkages of each hSCGN band in Supplementary Fig. S2A were identified as noted above. The main dimer band (#7, 8) of hSCGN possessed a Cys193-Cys193 linkage. Non-specific lower or upper bands of both apo-hSCGN monomer and dimer (#9, 10, 11, and 12) were identified as Cys193-Cys269, and hSCGN monomer with Ca2+ as Cys253-Cys269 (Supplementary Fig. S2B). Tandem mass spectra of the identified hSCGN disulfide bonds are shown in Fig. 1C and Supplementary Fig. S2C. The identification of the dimer linkage in Ca2+-treated hSCGN as Cys193-Cys193 was confirmed employing three Cys mutants, C193S, C253S, and C269S (Supplementary Fig. S3B). The hSCGN C193S mutant could not form dimers, while the hSCGN C253S and C269S mutants could. Dimerization was increased by Ca2+ binding, indicating that Cys193 is driving the disulfide linkage in SCGN dimers, while Cys253 and Cys269 did not affect Ca2+-response of SCGN in recombinant proteins (Supplementary Fig. S3B), and in HeLa cells overexpressing hSCGN WT and mutants as well (Fig. 1D).
To understand how the dimerization of hSCGN is regulated by Ca2+, we measured the redox sensitivity of hSCGN in response to H2O2 employing NPSB-B, a novel specific biotin-labeling chemical probe, which reacts with ROS sensitive Cys-SH residues21. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S3C, apo-hSCGN has a highly reactive cysteine residue, which is readily labeled with NPSB-B. The labeling decreased after oxidation with low concentrations of H2O2 (as little as 0.01 mM), in a H2O2 dose-dependent manner. This indicates that the availability of reactive Cys-SH residues can be affected by low concentrations of H2O2. To elucidate which cysteine residue is reactive and whether it is regulated by Ca2+, we examined NPSB-B labeling of various cysteine mutants. The cysteine reactivity of hSCGN WT, C253S and C269S was reduced by Ca2+ treatment; in contrast, the C193S mutant could not be labeled with NPSB-B (Fig. 1E). This indicates that Cys193 is the redox sensitive Cys residue and the reactivity of Cys193 in WT, C253S and C269S mutants is reduced by Ca2+ binding. These results suggest the possibility that conformational changes induced by Ca2+ binding in hSCGN regulate the redox reactivity of Cys193 residue, and cause the formation of stable dimers, without non-specific promiscuous dimerizations of hSCGN that occur in response to H2O2.
Calcium ion binding induces structural changes at N-terminal exposure to surface of hSCGN
Calcium sensor proteins having EF-hands are generally assumed to undergo conformational rearrangements following Ca2+ binding. These changes enable them to interact with target proteins and initiate signal transduction14. To determine whether structural changes occur in hSCGN in response to Ca2+ binding and thus potentially regulate hSCGN function, we conducted HDX-MS analysis of apo and Ca2+-bound SCGN. Because the crystal structure of calcium-bound hSCGN could not be obtained due to failure of crystal formation, we mapped hSCGN sequence onto the structure deduced from x-ray crystallographic and biophysical studies of Danio rerio SCGN in its Ca2+-free apo-state19, and used this structure to display the results of the HDX-MS studies. These studies revealed clear differences between apo and Ca2+-bound hSCGN with respect to the deuterium incorporation rates in particular regions of the protein (Supplementary Table S1). There were significant conformational changes in domains I and III of hSCGN (Fig. 2A). In Domain III, Ca2+ binding reduced the deuterium incorporation of EF5 and EF6 (Fig. 2C), and increased it at the Cys193 residue. The most dramatic HDX changes were found in N-terminal residues in EF1 and EF2 (18–28 a.a.) of Domain I; upon Ca2+ binding, there was a substantial increase in deuterium uptake of these hydrophobic residues (Fig. 2B). This indicates that Ca2+ binding causes significant conformational changes within the N-terminal region which could impact Cys193 and increase the dimerization of hSCGN. Ca2+ induced exposure of a hydrophobic patch seems to be a common feature of Ca2+ binding proteins. The structures of domains II and III of SCGN are superimposable upon the corresponding EF-hands of calbindin D28K, while that of domain I is not19. SCGN is known to have three isoforms, two of which are characterized by single amino acid changes at residue 22 Gln/Arg, and setagin is a variant of SCGN that consists of 49 amino acids having identical N-terminal 27 residues29. The N-terminal region of SCGN is presumed to have a distinct role in cellular processes, based on its structure and isoforms. Regulatory EF-hand proteins are believed to undergo conformational changes upon Ca2+ binding, which affect various cellular functions. However, the details of the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This study clearly shows that SCGN undergoes large conformational changes triggered by Ca2+ binding, which may play a role in Ca2+ dependent dimerization of hSCGN.
To further corroborate these HDX-MS results, we explored the dynamics of hSCGN and the events occurring in the Ca2+ binding, using molecular dynamics simulations. The starting hSCGN structure was generated using the MODELLER 9.9 program with the 3D structure of SCGN from Danio Rerio 19 as a template. We performed equilibrium molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of hSCGN with and without six Ca2+ ions (Fig. 3A). The six calciums were modeled in accordance with the sequence preference of the EF-hand loop (Supplementary Table S2)23. Root mean standard deviations (RMSDs) were calculated with respect to the backbone coordinates of the starting structures, with and without six Ca2+ ions (Supplementary Fig. S4A), respectively. Both structures changed significantly during the first 5 ns. However, the changes in the Ca2+-bound form reached the equilibrated trajectories more quickly, corresponding to an RMSD of slightly higher than 3 Å. In contrast, RMSDs of the Ca2+-free form surged up to ~4 Å and then decreased to ~2.8 Å in 25 ns. The sudden increase of RMSDs at 40 ns originated from flexibility of ten N-terminal residues in the absence of Ca2+ together with motion of Domain I, consistent with the results of the HDX studies. In the presence of 2 mM Ca2+, the interface between EF1 and EF2 was exposed, again as shown in the HDX experiments. MD simulations also showed that the conformational change at the interface was negligible in the absence of Ca2+, but was significant in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 3B). The binding of Ca2+ to EF1 and EF2 affected the short β-strands in the latter part of each loop, which form a small β-sheet. As a result, the interface gradually became more solvent-accessible, as shown in the solvent accessible surface area (SASA) plot (Fig. 3C). MD simulations also showed that the distance between two sulfur atoms of Cys253 and Cys269 became equilibrated after 15 ns with an average distance of ~3.7 Å (Fig. 3D) in the Ca2+-bound form. Since Cys253 and Cys269 are present on EF6, the binding of Ca2+ in EF6 appears to stabilize the region around these residues. Together with the increasing positive potential generated by Ca2+, the environment seems appropriate to form a disulfide bond between these two residues. However, the average distance between the sulfur atoms of Cys253 and Cys269 in the Ca2+-free form showed intermittent fluctuations even at the equilibrated state due to dynamic motion of EF6. This could make the formation of the disulfide bond between Cys253 and Cys269 difficult in the Ca2+-free form, in agreement with the results from MS analysis. Based on disulfide analysis by MS (Supplementary Fig. S2), the tendency for Cys253-Cys269 intra-disulfide bond formation in the monomer was enhanced by Ca2+ binding at band 2 and 6, and NPSB-B labeling and stable dimer formation of Cys253 or Cys269 mutants was increased (Fig. 1D). Thus the Cys253-Cys269 intramolecular disulfide bond is not essential for dimerization of SCGN, although it might facilitate the stable dimerization of hSCGN by solidifying C-terminal structure via Cys253-Cys269 linkage.
Rogstam et al.13 reported four calcium binding sites, one with high affinity and three with similar affinities. The explanations for our adding two more Ca2+ ions in the putative EF1 and EF2 domains were based on our studies of HDX with 2 mM CaCl2 where we found a vivid surface exposure with EF1 and EF2. It is evident that the two N-terminal EF1 and EF2 have lower calcium affinity compared with other four EFs. However, EF1 and EF2 are predicted as an EF-motif in EF-motif prediction programs such as CAL-EF-AFi (http://202.41.10.46/calb/index.html) and conformational changes at 2 mM CaCl2 have been clearly shown in the HDX experiments. Our experiments showed that EF1 and EF2 bind to Ca2+ at high calcium concentration due to their low calcium affinity. And our studies on MD simulation with six instead of four Ca2+ ions are in agreement with the above. Since there is no other calcium ion binding site in the N-terminal domain, the only plausible explanation of the conformational change around EF1 and EF2 was the binding of calcium ions in these EF motifs. Therefore, HDX experiment proves that hSCGN binds 6 Ca2+ in high Ca2+ concentration.
A dimeric hSCGN was constructed from coordinates at 35 ns, using HEX 6.330. The Ca2+-bound dimeric form clearly showed that the dimeric interface is well formed and that the N-terminal domain is located on the same side as Cys193 (Supplementary Fig. S4B). In addition, the two Cys193 residues face each other, corresponding with the Cys193-Cys193 dimer identified by MS. However, formation of a dimeric interface was not feasible with the Ca2+-free form taken from the 35 ns coordinates; and its N-terminal loop, as it clashed with the other subunit, if superimposed on the dimeric form of the Ca2+-bound form. Therefore, a decrease in the dynamic motion of the N-terminal domain may be an important factor for dimer formation. These results support the suggestion that the dimeric hSCGN is increased in the presence of Ca2+.
N-terminal region regulates Cys193-Cys193 dimer formation of hSCGN
Since Ca2+ binding induces structural changes in the N-terminal region of hSCGN, we hypothesized that N-terminal exposure regulates the intermolecular dimerization of Cys193 in Ca2+-bound hSCGN. To test this hypothesis, we generated a deletion mutant of hSCGN (ΔEF1, deletion of 1–52 a.a.), which has the stable conformation of purified protein. We examined the effect of truncating EF1 on Ca2+ triggered dimer formation. As shown in Fig. 4A, dimerization of ΔEF1 was not increased by Ca2+, while H2O2 induced dimerization was not affected by EF1 deletion. This is consistent with the hypothesis that a conformation change in the N-terminal region mediates the Ca2+-induced dimerization of hSCGN. To further test these results in in vivo, we examined hSCGN dimer formation in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transfected with hSCGN WT or ΔEF1 and were pre-incubated with ionomycin for 5 min to raise the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, followed by oxidative stimulation with H2O2 for 30 min. Dimer formation in each case was determined by Western analysis under non-reducing conditions. As shown in Fig. 4B, the amount of dimerization in response to ionomycin and H2O2 treatments was significantly higher in cells overexpressing hSCGN WT than the ΔEF1 mutant.
To further test whether N-terminal structural changes caused by Ca2+ binding (Fig. 2) affect the reactivity of Cys193, we examined the reactivity of Cys193 in transfected WT and ΔEF1 hSCGN using the chemical probe NPSB-B. NPSB-B labeling of hSCGN WT was significantly decreased upon ionomycin treatment, while that of ΔEF1 mutant did not change (Fig. 4C). This indicates that the ΔEF1 mutant, in contrast to hSCGN WT, cannot regulate the reactivity of Cys193 of hSCGN in response to Ca2+. These results are again consistent with the hypothesis that the conformational changes in the N-terminal domain of hSCGN caused by Ca2+ binding play a critical role in the regulation of dimerization and Cys193 reactivity.
Cys193-dependent dimerization of SCGN is an essential step regulating insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells
To determine the interrelationships among Ca2+ binding, structural changes, dimerization of SCGN, and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), we examined insulin secretion in NIT-1 cells, a mouse insulinoma cell line that expresses SCGN endogenously31–33. We first assessed the effect of Ca2+ and oxidative stress on SCGN dimerization in NIT-1 cells. We treated NIT-1 cells transfected with SCGN WT and C193 mutant with ionomycin, followed by H2O2 at doses that have been previously determined to be the physiologically relevant and optimal for NIT-1 cells6. WT hSCGN was found to be dimerized and oligomerized by treatment with ionomycin plus H2O2, while C193S hSCGN did not (Fig. 5A). No increase in dimerization of SCGN was found on treatment with H2O2 or ionomycin alone, suggesting that Ca2+ binding is necessary for the formation of dimers and oligomers and indicating that there is a strong synergy between the two treatments.
Since glucose stimulation promotes intracellular Ca2+ influx and ROS generation, we investigated whether SCGN dimerization contributes to glucose stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in pancreatic β-cells. NIT-1 cells transiently transfected with control vector, hSCGN WT and C193S mutant were starved for 2 h, followed by stimulation with glucose for 30 min and assay of secreted insulin. Figure 5B shows that GSIS was augmented in hSCGN WT transfected cells compared to control. hSCGN WT has a positive effect on insulin secretion, while the C193S mutant, unable to form dimers, partially inhibited it. To further explain this inhibitory effect of the C193S mutant on insulin secretion, we examined the effect of the C193S mutant on the dimerization of hSCGN WT using recombinant proteins. As shown in Fig. 5C, dimerization of hSCGN was reduced by addition of the C193S mutant, indicating that C193S interrupts hSCGN WT dimer formation. These results suggest that Cys193-dependent dimerization of SCGN is an essential step for regulating insulin secretion and that C193S mutant may act as a dominant negative mutant by disturbing the dimerization of endogenous SCGN in NIT-1 cells. Although the overexpression of hSCGN was modest because of the high endogenous SCGN expression in NIT-1 cells, the differences in insulin secretion between cells overexpressing hSCGN WT and C193S mutants vs. the controls were statistically significant.
We previously reported that hSCGN regulates insulin secretion through interaction with the actin cytoskeleton6. hSCGN interacts with actin and this interaction was increased by H2O2 and glucose stimulation, indicating that Ca2+ and ROS signaling regulate the interaction between SCGN and actin. To determine whether C193S hSCGN interferes with actin binding, we performed immunoprecipitation with hSCGN WT and C193S mutant. Since NIT-1 cells are not suitable for immunoprecipitation with ectopic hSCGN because of their high endogenous expression of SCGN, we used MDA-MB-231 cells, which express only trace amounts of hSCGN. We found that the C193S mutant did not interact with the actin cytoskeleton, whereas hSCGN WT did (Fig. 5D). These results suggest that SCGN dimerization plays a role in regulating insulin secretion through interaction with actin cytoskeleton.
We previously reported that SCGN regulates GSIS via ROS signaling and H2O2 treatment enhanced the co-localization with actin cytoskeleton in plasma membrane6. The dimerization of SCGN has a modulatory role in insulin secretion and further oligomerization of SCGN occurs only inside cells in response to H2O2 and ionomycin (Figs 1B,D, 4B and 5A). We examined whether dimerization and oligomerization are crucial for localization to membrane fraction, we performed fractionation of ectopic WT and Cys mutants of SCGN in HeLa cells. Supplementary Fig. S5 shows SCGN monomer and dimer localized to cytosol, nuclear, and membrane fractions, while SCGN oligomer localized in only nuclear and membrane fractions. C193S failed to form the dimer, therefore, dimeric and oligomeric C193S SCGN did not localized to nuclear and membrane fractions, indicating that dimerization is prerequisite for oligomerization. It is possible that SCGN dimers form hetero-oligomers with vesicle secretory machinery in NIT-1 cells in response to glucose stimulation, or that other special cellular conditions are required for oligomerization34. It is also possible that glucose stimulation increases the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and acutely dimerizes Ca2+-bound SCGN by ROS generation, with the dimerized SCGN forming oligomers that bind with the actin cytoskeleton to enhance insulin secretion. However, cellular function of oligomers remains to be further elucidated.
In summary, this study identifies a novel regulatory mechanism in the regulation of insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells by SCGN that involves stepwise structural changes brought on by Ca2+ binding, followed by SCGN dimerization by cysteine oxidation in response to ROS. Moreover, these changes appear to be important for GSIS. The elevation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration in glucose-stimulated pancreatic β-cells is hypothesized to cause conformational changes in inactive apo-SCGN via Ca2+ binding by inducing N-terminal flexibility. This is followed by allosteric regulation of Cys193 reactivity and stabilization of C-terminal disulfide bonds between C253 and C269 that prevents non-specific dimerization and induces an N-terminal conformation change to form Cys193-linked dimers more efficiently. This study identifies the molecular crosstalk between Ca2+ binding and oxidation in the formation of functionally-important disulfide dimers, crucial for the biological function of SCGN in insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Global Research Lab Program (No. 2012K1A1A2045441, K.J.L and J.E.F.), by Research fellowship (No. 2015R1D1A4A01019646, J.J.L.) and the Brain Research Program (2015M3C7A1028373) of National Research Foundation of Korea. S.Y. Yang was supported by Brain Korea 21 Plus (BK21 Plus) Project.
Author Contributions
K.J.L. designed the study, J.J.L. performed HDX-MS and analyzed mass spectrometry, S.Y.Y. biological experiments, and K.J.L., J.J.L. and S.Y.Y. wrote the manuscript. D.H.S. designed and J.P. performed the modeling of hSCGN, and J.E.F. bioinformatics analysis.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Jae-Jin Lee and Seo-Yun Yang contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07072-4
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wagner L, et al. Cloning and expression of secretagogin, a novel neuroendocrine- and pancreatic islet of Langerhans-specific Ca2+-binding protein. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275(32):24740–24751. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001974200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Romanov RA, et al. A secretagogin locus of the mammalian hypothalamus controls stress hormone release. EMBO J. 2015;34(1):36–54. doi: 10.15252/embj.201488977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mulder J, et al. Secretagogin is a Ca2+-binding protein specifying subpopulations of telencephalic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(52):22492–22497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912484106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Attems J, et al. Clusters of secretagogin-expressing neurons in the aged human olfactory tract lack terminal differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(16):6259–6264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203843109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bauer M, et al. Protein networks involved in vesicle fusion, transport, and storage revealed by array-based proteomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;781:47–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-276-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang SY, et al. Secretagogin affects insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells by regulating actin dynamics and focal adhesion. Biochem J. 2016;473(12):1791–1803. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ashcroft FM, et al. Stimulus-secretion coupling in pancreatic beta cells. J Cell Biochem. 1994;55(Suppl):54–65. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240550007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henquin JC, Ravier MA, Nenquin M, Jonas JC, Gilon P. Hierarchy of the beta-cell signals controlling insulin secretion. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003;33(9):742–750. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01207.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leloup C, et al. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species are obligatory signals for glucose-induced insulin secretion. Diabetes. 2009;58(3):673–681. doi: 10.2337/db07-1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pi J, et al. Reactive oxygen species as a signal in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Diabetes. 2007;56(7):1783–1791. doi: 10.2337/db06-1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rebelato E, Abdulkader F, Curi R, Carpinelli AR. Control of the intracellular redox state by glucose participates in the insulin secretion mechanism. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e24507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Niki I, Hidaka H. Roles of intracellular Ca2+ receptors in the pancreatic beta-cell in insulin secretion. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999;190(1–2):119–124. doi: 10.1023/A:1006997822987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rogstam A, et al. Binding of calcium ions and SNAP-25 to the hexa EF-hand protein secretagogin. Biochem J. 2007;401(1):353–363. doi: 10.1042/BJ20060918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burgoyne RD. Neuronal calcium sensor proteins: generating diversity in neuronal Ca2+ signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(3):182–193. doi: 10.1038/nrn2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vazquez-Torres A. Redox active thiol sensors of oxidative and nitrosative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;17(9):1201–1214. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sharma AK, Khandelwal R, Sharma Y, Rajanikanth V. Secretagogin, a hexa EF-hand calcium-binding protein: high level bacterial overexpression, one-step purification and properties. Protein Expr Purif. 2015;109:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khandelwal, R., Sharma, A. K., Chadalawada, S., & Sharma, Y. Secretagogin Is a Redox-Responsive Ca2+ Sensor. Biochemistry56 (2), 411–420 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 18.Sanagavarapu, K., Weiffert, T., Ni Mhurchu, N., O’Connell, D., & Linse, S. Calcium Binding and Disulfide Bonds Regulate the Stability of Secretagogin towards Thermal and Urea Denaturation. PLoS One11(11), e0165709 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Bitto E, et al. X-ray structure of Danio rerio secretagogin: A hexa-EF-hand calcium sensor. Proteins. 2009;76(2):477–483. doi: 10.1002/prot.22362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim MS, Jeong J, Shin DH, Lee KJ. Structure of Nm23-H1 under oxidative conditions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013;69(Pt 4):669–680. doi: 10.1107/S0907444913001194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee JJ, et al. Sulfhydryl-specific probe for monitoring protein redox sensitivity. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9(12):2883–2894. doi: 10.1021/cb500839j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(Pt 12 Pt 1):2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gifford JL, Walsh MP, Vogel HJ. Structures and metal-ion-binding properties of the Ca2+-binding helix-loop-helix EF-hand motifs. Biochem J. 2007;405(2):199–221. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Phillips JC, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26(16):1781–1802. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The Langevin piston method. J Chem Phys. 1995;103(11):4613–4621. doi: 10.1063/1.470648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph14 (1), 33–38, 27–38 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Turner, P. J. XMGRACE, version 5.1. 19. (Center for Coastal and Land-Margin Research, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology, Beaverton OR, 2005).
- 28.Choi S, et al. New algorithm for the identification of intact disulfide linkages based on fragmentation characteristics in tandem mass spectra. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(1):626–635. doi: 10.1021/pr900771r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zierhut B, et al. Setagin and secretagogin-R22: Posttranscriptional modification products of the secretagogin gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329(4):1193–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ritchie DW, Venkatraman V. Ultra-fast FFT protein docking on graphics processors. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2398–2405. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hamaguchi K, Gaskins HR, Leiter EH. NIT-1, a pancreatic beta-cell line established from a transgenic NOD/Lt mouse. Diabetes. 1991;40(7):842–849. doi: 10.2337/diab.40.7.842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xia HQ, Pan Y, Peng J, Lu GX. Over-expression of miR375 reduces glucose-induced insulin secretion in Nit-1 cells. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38(5):3061–3065. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-9973-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yuan H, et al. Suppression of NADPH oxidase 2 substantially restores glucose-induced dysfunction of pancreatic NIT-1 cells. FEBS J. 2010;277(24):5061–5071. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bauer MC, et al. Identification of a high-affinity network of secretagogin-binding proteins involved in vesicle secretion. Mol Biosyst. 2011;7(7):2196–2204. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00349b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.