Abstract
Calcineurin is the only known serine/threonine phosphatase under calcium/calmodulin control and key regulator of the immune system. Treatment of patients with calcineurin-inhibitory drugs like Cyclosporin A and FK506 to prevent graft rejection increases dramatically the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), which are a major cause of death after organ transplants. Recent evidence indicates that suppression of calcineurin signalling, together with its impact on the immune system, exerts direct tumor promoting effects in keratinocytes, enhancing cancer stem cell potential. The underlying mechanism involves interruption of a double negative regulatory axis, whereby calcineurin/NFAT inhibits expression of ATF3, a negative regulator of p53. The resulting suppression of keratinocyte cancer cell senescence is of likely clinical significance for the many patients under treatment with calcineurin inhibitors, and may be of relevance for other cancer types where altered calcium/calcineurin signalling plays a role.
Introduction
Squamous cell carcinomas have a very high incidence in the human population, encompassing skin, oral and esophageal cancer, squamous (bronchial) lung carcinoma, carcinoma of the cervix and other parts of the urogenital system. A distinguishing feature of these tumors is their high level of heterogeneity, with self-renewing cell populations admixed with cells at different stages of differentiation. The aggressiveness of these tumors, and their resilience to therapy, are likely determined by a dynamic equilibrium between stem cell populations and their daughter cells (1–3). In the skin, as in other tissues, cells harboring oncogenic mutations can remain quiescent for long periods of time (4).
Important mechanisms involved in restraining cells with oncogenic potential are the induction of cellular senescence (5) and/or differentiation (6). Counteracting these failsafe mechanisms are conditions of perturbed tissue homeostasis, such as those resulting from wound healing (7) or inflammation (8). The immune system is also thought to play a major role in preventing or limiting tumor spread (9).
Calcineurin/NFAT signaling and biological function
Calcineurin is the only known serine/threonine phosphatase under calcium/calmodulin control (10). It is a heterodimeric enzyme formed by a catalytic (Calcineurin A, CnA), and a Ca 2+-binding regulatory subunit (Calcineurin B, CnB) (11). CnA shows a highly conserved multidomain structure: the catalytic domain (residues 70-328) is followed by the CnB-binding domain (residues 333–390) and a C-terminus regulatory domain (residues 390–521). This regulatory domain in turn can be divided into two sub-domains: a calmodulin-binding and an autoinhibitory sub-domain (11). Three isoforms of CnA exist, a (neural), β (ubiquitous) and g (testis specific), which share more than 80% of identity in the catalytic and regulatory regions (11). CnB is expressed in two isoforms, CnB1 (ubiquitous) and CnB2 (testis-specific). CnB is absolutely required for Calcineurin enzymatic activity (11), even if its role in calcium-dependent activation remains unclear.
Among the proteins that are dephosphorylated as a consequence of Calcineurin activation are the Nuclear Factors of Activated T cells (NFATs). Increased Calcineurin activity promotes the localization of NFATs to the nucleus, which is counteracted by the phosphorylation of these factors by a number of kinases such as GSK3, CK1, p38, JNK1 and DRK1 (10, 12). This opposite mode of regulation may explain why induction of NFAT-dependent transcription by Calcineurin activation is not immediately associated with increases in intracellular calcium levels, but requires a more prolonged period of time (10).
Studies on the biological function of Calcineurin have been greatly facilitated by the use of the inhibitory drugs Cyclosporin A (CsA) and FK506 (10). Several endogenous Calcineurin inhibitors have also been reported. Among these is Calcipressin (CALP1), also known as the DSCR1 gene product, located in the Down Syndrome Candidate Region of human chromosome 21 (13). This protein binds directly to the calcineurin catalytic subunit and inhibits its activity (13). Importantly, Calcipressin gene expression is under direct positive control of Calcineurin/NFAT activity, so that this protein can function as part of a negative feedback mechanism for modulation of Calcineurin signaling (13).
The function of Calcineurin has been elucidated in great detail in T-cells, but has also been studied in the hematopoietic, neuronal, myogenic, and vascular systems (10). Calcineurin activity has also been implicated in promoting keratinocyte differentiation (14) and, in vivo, in control of the hair cycle in concert with Notch signaling (15). Downstream of calcineurin, a specific NFAT isoform, NFATc1 has been functionally linked to maintenance of quiescent stem cell populations in the mouse hair follicle (16).
Calcineurin/NFAT involvement in tumor development
A number of studies have shown that deregulation of calcineurin/NFAT signaling can play an important role in tumorigenesis. This pathway has been implicated in the control of tumor-associated angiogenesis. In mice with loss of calcipressin function, enhanced calcineurin activity leads to apoptosis of endothelial cells, with suppression of tumorigenesis (17). Treatment of these mice with cyclosporin A rescues the endothelial defect, restoring tumor growth (17). However, increased expression of calcipressin, in mice with one additional copy of the gene, has also been linked to tumor suppression through negative modulation of the vasculature (18). This has been proposed as a mechanism for the reduced susceptibility of Down’s syndrome patients to cancer development (18).
Specific NFAT isoforms have also been implicated in a number of human solid tumors or hematological malignancies, through a variety of mechanisms that enhance the intrinsic tumorigenic properties of cells and/or alter their surrounding environment (19).
In the clinics, treatment of patients with calcineurin inhibitors to prevent graft rejection results in a dramatic increase of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) formation (20). In fact, cutaneous SCC is one of the most deleterious consequences of treatment with these drugs, historically accounting in some cohorts up to 50% of deaths after year 4 from transplants (21). Interestingly, the combined use of Cyclosporin A and psoralen-UVA in psoriasis patients causes also a very high rate of skin SCC, which prompted discontinuation of this modality of treatment (22). The tumor promoting effects of calcineurin inhibitory drugs have been generally attributed to inhibition of the immune system and, in particular, T cell function (see, for instance, (23, 24)). However, while the risk of cutaneous SCC in CsA-treated patients is 65–100 fold higher risk than in the normal population, the incidence of other skin tumors, like basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or melanoma, or that of internal malignancies, increases to a significantly lesser extent (20). Additionally, other more recently developed immunosuppressive drugs that do not affect calcineurin activity, such as mTOR inhibitors, have a much lesser impact on skin SCC formation (20). Thus, while important, immune suppression per se is unlikely to account for the selectively increased risk of cutaneous SCCs associated with calcineurin inhibition.
Intrinsic tumor suppressive function of Calcineurin/NFAT in keratinocytes
In recent work, we have tested the possibility that, together with its function in keratinocyte growth/differentiation control (14–16), the calcineurin/NFAT pathway plays an intrinsic role in skin SCC tumor suppression. In support of this possibility, we found that mice with keratinocyte-specific deletion of the calcineurin B1 gene (CnB1), essential for calcineurin activity (15), have increased susceptibility to chemically-induced carcinogenesis, with decreased latency, higher incidence and size of tumours, and earlier malignant conversion (25). In a xenograft model of SCC formation in severely immunocompromised mice, genetic and pharmacological suppression of calcineurin/NFAT function was also sufficient to enhance tumorigenicity of primary human keratinocytes (HKCs) expressing oncogenic H-rasV12, or cutaneous SCC cells (25).
The size of cancer stem cell populations is a likely determinant of the susceptibility to skin cancer development (26). Like primary keratinocytes, established cancer cell lines, including SCC cells, contain distinct sub-populations with different self renewal capability (27, 28). As an in vivo assay of tumorigenic potential, H-rasV12-expressing HKCs, sorted for stem cell-associated markers, were injected in serial dilutions at the dermal-epidermal junction of severely immuno-compromised mice. In control mice at 1 month after injection, cells formed only a few keratinized cysts with limited cellularity. By contrast, in the CsA-treated mice, the same cells gave rise to a striking number of “proliferative centers”, composed of keratinocytes with elevated Ki67 positivity. These readily produced secondary tumors upon transfer into similarly immune suppressed and CsA treated mice. Similar results were obtained with sorted SCC cell lines (25).
Antagonistic role of Calcineurin and ATF3 in p53-dependent cancer cell senescence
Cancer cell senescence is a failsafe mechanism against tumour development that can suppress cancer stem cell potential. Underlying its tumor promoting effects, calcineurin/NFAT inhibition was found to suppress cancer cell senescence together with down-modulation of p53 expression, a key mediator of oncogene-induced senescence (25). Down-modulation of p53 occurred at both protein and mRNA level. While the best studied mechanisms of p53 regulation are posttranscriptional (29), a perhaps less appreciated but important form of p53 regulation is at the level of p53 gene transcription (1, 30). Previous work showed that p53 gene transcription is under negative control of the AP-1 complex, specifically c-Jun and c-Fos, in both HKCs and SCC cells (31). c-Jun and c-Fos levels were unaffected in these cells by calcineurin/NFAT inhibition. However, expression of ATF3, a member of the ATF/cyclic AMP response element-binding family of transcription factors that can heterodimerize with AP1 family members (32) was sharply up-regulated (25). Increased ATF3 expression was previously connected with SCC progression (33) as well as negative regulation of p53 expression (34). Further analysis showed that, in HKCs, suppression of senescence, down-regulation of p53 as well as increased tumorigenicity by calcineurin/NFAT inhibition was dependent on ATF3 upregulation. Conversely, increased ATF3 levels elicited the same tumour enhancing effects as calcineurin/NFAT inhibition. These findings were not limited to the experimental situation. In fact, decreased senescence and increased ATF3 expression were also observed in a large cohort of SCCs from CsA-treated versus untreated patients (25).
Possible dual consequences of calcineurin suppression and ATF3 up-regulation on intrinsic cell regulatory mechanisms and cytokine production
In most cells, ATF3 expression is very low and strongly induced in response to a variety of stress-related signals (Hai et al., 1999; Hai and Hartman, 2001). In keratinocytes, transcription of the ATF3 gene is under direct negative control of NFATc1 (25), but other mechanisms are likely to participate in its regulation, such as UV exposure and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Like other key transcription regulatory molecules, ATF3, can either promote or suppress tumor development, depending on cell type and context (35). In addition, ATF3 is involved in immunity and inflammation through control of cytokine expression (32). Intriguingly, p53, which we have implicated as a significant target of ATF3 in keratinocytes (25), also modulates a number of cytokines with a known or likely role in control of proliferative potential (36). Downstream of p53, up-regulation of the Notch 1 gene plays a key role in restricting keratinocyte self renewing populations and promoting differentiation (37, 38), while, at the same time, influencing the surrounding stromal environment (39). Thus, a model can be envisaged whereby calcineurin/NFAT signaling plays a dual tumor suppressing function in keratinocytes. On one side, inhibition of this pathway, through elevation of ATF3 expression, can suppress p53-mediated cellular senescence and expand cancer stem populations (Fig. 1A,B). On the other side, calcineurin inhibition, through this or other mechanisms, could lead to a more permissive tumor-promoting environment (Fig. 1C).
Figure 1. Tumor suppressing function of calcineurin/NFAT in keratinocytes.

A, in keratinocytes, as in other cell types, oncogenic mutations and associated replicative stress result in increased p53 protein levels and activity with cell senescence as a protective mechanism against cancer development. B, inhibition of calcineurin/NFAT signaling enhances expression of ATF3, a negative regulator of p53 gene transcription. The resulting down-modulation of p53 levels suppresses cancer cell senescence and can explain, in part, increased predisposition to cancer development. C, the strongly increased risk of patients under treatment with calcineurin inhibitors for keratinocyte-derived SCC in the skin contrasts with the risk of keratinocyte-derived tumors in internal organs like the oral cavity. A likely explanation is exposure to UV light and its tumor promoting effects resulting from a direct impact on keratinocytes as well as more indirect consequences in the underlying stroma. The latter include possible changes of skin resident cells (indicated by blue diamonds-romboids) and increased infiltration of inflammatory cells (red circles).
Future perspectives
A number of important questions need to be addressed. First of all, there is no explanation for the strongly increased risk of patients under treatment with calcineurin inhibitors for keratinocyte-derived SCC in the skin as opposed to internal organs like the oral cavity. A likely culprit is exposure to UV light and its possible interplay with calcineurin/NFAT signaling in keratinocytes, either directly or through cytokine-mediated inflammation (Fig. 1C). A second unsolved issue is the basis for the selectively increased risk of cutaneous SCCs versus BCCs in patients under treatment with calcineurin inhibitors. This could be linked to different cells of origin of the two types of tumors and the different role that calcineurin/NFAT may play in these cells. Finally, an exciting possibility for future studies is that the concomitant pharmacological up-regulation of the p53 and Notch pathways, known to induce senescence and/or differentiation (1), may be of clinical significance in reducing the risk of cutaneous SCCs in patients under treatment with calcineurin inhibitors and related predisposing conditions.
Acknowledgments
I thank Drs. Günther Hofbauer, Xunwei Wu and Cathrin Brisken for their critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from NIH (Grants AR39190 and AR054856), the Swiss National Foundation and Oncosuisse (Grant 02361-02-2009).
References
- 1.Dotto GP. Crosstalk of Notch with p53 and p63 in cancer growth control. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:587–95. doi: 10.1038/nrc2675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liby KT, Yore MM, Sporn MB. Triterpenoids and rexinoids as multifunctional agents for the prevention and treatment of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:357–69. doi: 10.1038/nrc2129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rakoff-Nahoum S, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nrc2541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boukamp P. Non-melanoma skin cancer: what drives tumor development and progression? Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:1657–67. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Finkel T, Serrano M, Blasco MA. The common biology of cancer and ageing. Nature. 2007;448:767–74. doi: 10.1038/nature05985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mandinova A, Kolev V, Neel V, Hu B, Stonely W, Lieb J, et al. A positive FGFR3/FOXN1 feedback loop underlies benign skin keratosis versus squamous cell carcinoma formation in humans. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:3127–37. doi: 10.1172/JCI38543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bissell MJ, Radisky D. Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:46–54. doi: 10.1038/35094059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44. doi: 10.1038/nature07205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krieg C, Boyman O. The role of chemokines in cancer immune surveillance by the adaptive immune system. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Crabtree GR, Olson EN. NFAT signaling: choreographing the social lives of cells. Cell. 2002;109(Suppl):S67–79. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00699-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Klee CB, Ren H, Wang X. Regulation of the calmodulin-stimulated protein phosphatase, calcineurin. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13367–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.22.13367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee Y, Ha J, Kim HJ, Kim YS, Chang EJ, Song WJ, et al. Negative feedback Inhibition of NFATc1 by DYRK1A regulates bone homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:33343–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.042234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rothermel BA, Vega RB, Williams RS. The Role of Modulatory Calcineurin-Interacting Proteins in Calcineurin Signaling. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2003;13:15–21. doi: 10.1016/s1050-1738(02)00188-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santini MP, Talora C, Seki T, Bolgan L, Dotto GP. Cross talk among calcineurin, Sp1/Sp3, and NFAT in control of p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression in keratinocyte differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:9575–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161299698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mammucari C, Tommasi di Vignano A, Sharov AA, Neilson J, Havrda MC, Roop DR, et al. Integration of Notch 1 and calcineurin/NFAT signaling pathways in keratinocyte growth and differentiation control. Dev Cell. 2005;8:665–76. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Horsley V, Aliprantis AO, Polak L, Glimcher LH, Fuchs E. NFATc1 balances quiescence and proliferation of skin stem cells. Cell. 2008;132:299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ryeom S, Baek KH, Rioth MJ, Lynch RC, Zaslavsky A, Birsner A, et al. Targeted deletion of the calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1 suppresses tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:420–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Baek KH, Zaslavsky A, Lynch RC, Britt C, Okada Y, Siarey RJ, et al. Down’s syndrome suppression of tumour growth and the role of the calcineurin inhibitor DSCR1. Nature. 2009;459:1126–30. doi: 10.1038/nature08062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mancini M, Toker A. NFAT proteins: emerging roles in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:810–20. doi: 10.1038/nrc2735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Claudy A. Skin cancers after organ transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1681–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra022137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Veness MJ, Quinn DI, Ong CS, Keogh AM, Macdonald PS, Cooper SG, et al. Aggressive cutaneous malignancies following cardiothoracic transplantation: the Australian experience. Cancer. 1999;85:1758–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paul CF, Ho VC, McGeown C, Christophers E, Schmidtmann B, Guillaume JC, et al. Risk of malignancies in psoriasis patients treated with cyclosporine: a 5 y cohort study. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:211–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12040.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carroll RP, Segundo DS, Hollowood K, Marafioti T, Clark TG, Harden PN, et al. Immune phenotype predicts risk for posttransplantation squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21:713–22. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009060669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kosmidis M, Dziunycz P, Suarez-Farinas M, Muhleisen B, Scharer L, Lauchli S, et al. Immunosuppression affects CD4+ mRNA expression and induces Th2 dominance in the microenvironment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients. J Immunother. 2010;33:538–46. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181cc2615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu X, Nguyen BC, Dziunycz P, Chang S, Brooks Y, Lefort K, et al. Opposing roles for calcineurin and ATF3 in squamous skin cancer. Nature. 2010;465:368–72. doi: 10.1038/nature08996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Malanchi I, Peinado H, Kassen D, Hussenet T, Metzger D, Chambon P, et al. Cutaneous cancer stem cell maintenance is dependent on beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2008;452:650–3. doi: 10.1038/nature06835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Locke M, Heywood M, Fawell S, Mackenzie IC. Retention of intrinsic stem cell hierarchies in carcinoma-derived cell lines. Cancer Res. 2005;65:8944–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Prince ME, Ailles LE. Cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2871–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Toledo F, Wahl GM. Regulating the p53 pathway: in vitro hypotheses, in vivo veritas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:909–23. doi: 10.1038/nrc2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reisman D, Loging WT. Transcriptional regulation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Semin Cancer Biol. 1998;8:317–24. doi: 10.1006/scbi.1998.0094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kolev V, Mandinova A, Guinea-Viniegra J, Hu B, Lefort K, Lambertini C, et al. EGFR signalling as a negative regulator of Notch1 gene transcription and function in proliferating keratinocytes and cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:902–11. doi: 10.1038/ncb1750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thompson MR, Xu D, Williams BR. ATF3 transcription factor and its emerging roles in immunity and cancer. J Mol Med. 2009;87:1053–60. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0520-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wang A, Arantes S, Conti C, McArthur M, Aldaz CM, MacLeod MC. Epidermal hyperplasia and oral carcinoma in mice overexpressing the transcription factor ATF3 in basal epithelial cells. Mol Carcinog. 2007;46:476–87. doi: 10.1002/mc.20298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kawauchi J, Zhang C, Nobori K, Hashimoto Y, Adachi MT, Noda A, et al. Transcriptional repressor activating transcription factor 3 protects human umbilical vein endothelial cells from tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced apoptosis through down-regulation of p53 transcription. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:39025–34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202974200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yin X, Dewille JW, Hai T. A potential dichotomous role of ATF3, an adaptive-response gene, in cancer development. Oncogene. 2008;27:2118–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Riley T, Sontag E, Chen P, Levine A. Transcriptional control of human p53-regulated genes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:402–12. doi: 10.1038/nrm2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lefort K, Mandinova A, Ostano P, Kolev V, Calpini V, Kolfschoten I, et al. Notch1 is a p53 target gene involved in human keratinocyte tumor suppression through negative regulation of ROCK1/2 and MRCKalpha kinases. Genes Dev. 2007;21:562–77. doi: 10.1101/gad.1484707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yugawa T, Handa K, Narisawa-Saito M, Ohno S, Fujita M, Kiyono T. Regulation of Notch1 gene expression by p53 in epithelial cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:3732–42. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02119-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Demehri S, Turkoz A, Kopan R. Epidermal Notch1 loss promotes skin tumorigenesis by impacting the stromal microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
