Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) impairs dendritic cell (DC) functions and induces suboptimal antigen-specific CD4 T cell immune responses that are poorly protective. Mucosal T-helper cells producing IFN-γ (Th1) and IL-17 (Th17) are important for protecting against tuberculosis (TB), but the mechanisms by which DCs generate antigen-specific T-helper responses during Mtb infection are not well defined. We previously reported that Mtb impairs CD40 expression on DCs and restricts Th1 and Th17 responses. We now demonstrate that CD40-dependent costimulation is required to generate IL-17 responses to Mtb. CD40-deficient DCs were unable to induce antigen-specific IL-17 responses after Mtb infection despite the production of Th17-polarizing innate cytokines. Disrupting the interaction between CD40 on DCs and its ligand CD40L on antigen-specific CD4 T cells, genetically or via antibody blockade, significantly reduced antigen-specific IL-17 responses. Importantly, engaging CD40 on DCs with a multimeric CD40 agonist (CD40LT) enhanced antigen-specific IL-17 generation in ex vivo DC-T cell co-culture assays. Further, intratracheal instillation of Mtb-infected DCs treated with CD40LT significantly augmented antigen-specific Th17 responses in vivo in the lungs and lung-draining lymph nodes of mice. Finally, we show that boosting CD40-CD40L interactions promoted balanced Th1/Th17 responses in a setting of mucosal DC transfer, and conferred enhanced control of lung bacterial burdens following aerosol challenge with Mtb. Our results demonstrate that CD40 costimulation by DCs plays an important role in generating antigen-specific Th17 cells and targeting the CD40-CD40L pathway represents a novel strategy to improve adaptive immunity to TB.
Author summary
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a serious global health problem and understanding how to induce protective immunity to M. tuberculosis (Mtb) remains a major challenge. While antigen-specific CD4 T cells and IFN-γ are important for controlling Mtb infection, they are not sufficient for protecting against TB. We need insights into host pathways that can be targeted to overcome suboptimal antigen-specific immunity induced by Mtb. Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen presenting cells that orchestrate the adaptive immune response to infection, but Mtb subverts DC-T cell interactions. Therefore, improving the crosstalk between DCs and T cells during Mtb infection has the potential to enhance anti-mycobacterial immunity. Here we identify interaction between CD40 on DCs and CD40L on T cells as a critical mechanism for generating lung Th17 cells. By engaging CD40 on DCs using a multimeric reagent, we significantly augmented early Mtb-specific Th17 responses in lungs. Intratracheal DC instillation in conjunction with CD40 engagement provided a balanced Th1/Th17 response and improved control of bacterial burden after aerosol challenge with Mtb. Our studies show that the CD40-CD40L pathway is important for the generation of Mtb-specific Th17 responses and targeting CD40-CD40L interactions is a promising avenue for improving adaptive immunity to TB.
Introduction
Critical to the success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) as a pathogen is its ability to manipulate host innate and adaptive immune responses to its benefit. Despite the development of antigen-specific T cell responses following infection, Mtb is able to persist within the host, indicating that Mtb-specific T cell immunity is suboptimal and ineffective at eliminating the pathogen [1, 2]. Indeed, several studies have shown that mice infected with Mtb exhibit delayed initiation of antigen-specific CD4 T cell responses, which is preceded by delayed migration of Mtb-containing dendritic cells (DCs) from the lung to draining lymph nodes [3–5]. Moreover, although IFN-γ and T-helper 1 (Th1) responses are important for controlling infection, they are not sufficient to eradicate bacteria and do not protect against developing tuberculosis (TB) [6–8]. Recently, IL-17 and Th17 responses have emerged as important for protective immunity to TB [9–16]. Studies in mice suggest that early induction of IL-17 in the lung promotes control of mycobacterial growth, and balanced Th1/Th17 responses in the lung have been reported to be more effective [17–19]. We previously reported that an avirulent hip1 (Hydrolase important for pathogenesis 1; Rv2224c) mutant Mtb strain induced significantly higher IL-17 and IFN-γ responses compared to infection with wild type Mtb due to enhanced functions of infected DCs [20, 21]. Together, these studies suggest that wild type Mtb subverts DCs to prevent optimal T-helper responses and that augmenting DC functions during infection may be beneficial for improving protective immunity. While several studies have reported that Mtb manipulation of DC functions leads to suboptimal Th1 responses [21–24], we lack insights into Th17 generation during Mtb infection. To gain insight into host pathways involved in generating Th17 responses during Mtb infection, we sought to define the molecular mechanisms underlying Th17 responses following Mtb infection of DCs.
As the primary antigen-presenting cells in the immune system, DCs are instrumental in shaping adaptive immunity and determining the types of antigen-specific T-helper subsets that are generated in response to infection. Upon phagocytosis of the pathogen, DCs present pathogen-derived antigens to naïve CD4 T cells, provide critical costimulatory signals and produce cytokines; these signals initiate antigen-specific T-helper cell activation and polarization towards specific subsets [25–27]. However, beyond the role of cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-23 in polarizing and committing antigen-specific CD4 T cells towards a Th17 phenotype, the DC-T cell interactions underlying Th17 polarization during Mtb infection are poorly defined. We previously showed that eliminating Hip1-dependent immune evasion mechanisms in Mtb enhanced the capacity of DCs to induce Th17 responses and was accompanied by significantly higher expression of the costimulatory molecule, CD40, on infected DCs [21]. Because costimulation of naïve T cells in the context of cognate interactions between DCs and T cells is critical for optimal activation and differentiation of antigen-specific T cells, these data suggested that impaired CD40-dependent costimulation during wild type Mtb infection may lead to suboptimal Th17 responses in TB. CD40 has previously been implicated in generating Th1 responses during Mtb infection [28], but its role in the polarization of the Th17 subset during infection is not defined. We therefore sought to investigate the contribution of the CD40 costimulatory pathway in Th17 generation during Mtb infection and determine the effects of augmenting CD40 costimulation on bacterial control. In this study, we show that CD40 expression on DCs is required for the generation of IL-17 responses to Mtb infection and that interaction between CD40 on DCs and CD40L on CD4 T cells is critical for generating antigen-specific IL-17 responses. Importantly, we found that engaging CD40 on DCs via crosslinking with a multimeric CD40 agonist reagent (CD40LT) significantly enhanced antigen-specific IL-17 responses to Mtb. Further, intratracheal instillation of Mtb-infected DCs treated with CD40LT led to significant enhancement of antigen-specific Th17 responses in the lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) of mice, showing that engaging the CD40-CD40L pathway can overcome suboptimal Th17 responses to Mtb in vivo. Finally, we show that CD40 engagement in the setting of a DC transfer model enhances control of Mtb following aerosol challenge. Our results demonstrate that the CD40-CD40L pathway is critical for generating IL-17 responses and that targeting this costimulatory pathway represents a novel strategy to potentially improve protection against TB.
Results
CD40 on DCs is required for the generation of antigen-specific IL-17 responses during Mtb infection
To test whether CD40 expression is required for differentiation of naïve CD4 T cells into IL-17-producing cells in response to Mtb infection, we used DC-T cell co-culture assays as previously described [21]. We infected bone marrow derived DCs from wild type C57BL/6 mice (B6) or from CD40-/- mice for 24 hours, followed by co-culture with purified naïve TCR-transgenic (Tg) CD4 T cells isolated from OT-II mice in the presence of OVA323–339 peptide (Fig 1A). Supernatants were harvested 72 hours after co-culture and assayed for IL-17, IL-2 and IFN-γ by ELISA. Mtb-infected DCs from B6 mice induced increasing levels of IL-17, IL-2 and IFN-γ cytokines with increasing concentrations of peptide. In contrast, CD40-/- DCs were significantly impaired in their ability to induce IL-17-producing cells in response to Mtb, but retained the capacity to induce IFN-γ and IL-2 (Fig 1A). These data indicate that CD40 is specifically required to generate antigen-specific IL-17 responses.
To assess whether the defect in IL-17 production was specific for CD40 deficiency, we examined the contribution of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86, which are known to be essential for IL-2 production and are required for optimal T cell proliferation [29, 30]. While DCs that were doubly-deficient in CD80 and CD86 were severely impaired in IL-2 production, their ability to induce antigen-specific IL-17 responses were comparable to DCs from B6 mice (Fig 1B) and did not exhibit the defective IL-17 responses observed in CD40-/- DCs. These data indicate that CD40-dependent costimulation plays an essential and specific role in the generation of IL-17 responses to Mtb.
Cytokines produced by infected DCs are known to be critical for polarizing antigen-specific CD4 T cell subsets [17, 31]. Since IL-6, IL-1β, and TGF-β have been shown to induce Th17 polarization, we sought to assess whether defective IL-17 responses seen in Mtb-infected CD40-/- DCs was due to defects in their ability to produce innate cytokines following Mtb infection. However, levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-12 produced by DCs from CD40-/- mice were comparable to the levels seen in DCs from B6 mice (Fig 1C) and bioactive TGF-β was undetectable in all culture conditions. Thus, the inability of CD40-/- DCs to induce IL-17 responses is not due to impaired innate cytokine responses, suggesting that interaction of CD40 expressed on DCs with its ligand, CD40L (CD154), may be necessary for production of IL-17 by CD4 T cells following Mtb infection.
CD40-CD40L interaction is critical for inducing antigen-specific IL-17 responses to Mtb infection
CD40L is expressed on antigen-activated T cells and binding of CD40 with CD40L provides accessory costimulatory signals that are necessary for optimal activation and differentiation of antigen-specific T cells. In order to determine whether interaction of CD40 with CD40L was required for IL-17 generation, we carried out co-culture assays using antigen-specific CD4 T cells isolated from OT-II mice crossed to mice lacking CD40L (CD40lg-/- x OT-II). This allowed us to test whether CD40L on T cells was required for IL-17 generation in a setting where CD40 expression on DCs remained intact. We found that CD40lg-/- CD4 T cells were attenuated in their ability to generate IL-17 responses after co-culture with Mtb-infected DCs (Fig 2A), concordant with the defective IL-17 response seen with CD40-/- DCs (Fig 1). Interestingly, CD40lg-/- T cells also displayed attenuated IFN-γ and IL-2 responses (S1 Fig), which suggests that lack of CD40L leads to broader defects in T cell responses compared to the absence of CD40. These results show that both CD40 and CD40L are required for optimal IL-17 generation. To further extend our genetic knockouts studies, we carried out co-culture assays in which we blocked CD40-CD40L interactions using saturating doses of a non-agonistic, anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (clone MR1). This antibody has been shown to successfully block CD40-CD40L interactions in vitro (S2 Fig) and in vivo [32]. Blockade of CD40-CD40L interaction between Mtb-infected DCs and CD40L-replete antigen-specific CD4 T cells significantly reduced antigen-specific IL-17 responses (Fig 2B). Together, these data show that interaction between CD40 and CD40L is critical for production of IL-17 by CD4 T cells during Mtb infection.
Engaging CD40 on DCs enhances antigen-specific IL-17 responses
The requirement for the CD40-CD40L pathway in IL-17 generation suggested that boosting interactions between CD40 and CD40L could serve as a tool to augment IL-17 responses. To exogenously engage CD40 on Mtb-infected DCs, we utilized a multimeric CD40 agonist in which two trimeric CD40L constructs are artificially linked (CD40L trimers; CD40LT). The CD40LT reagent effectively aggregates and activates CD40 independently of T cells. Addition of CD40LT to Mtb-infected B6 DCs produced enhanced levels of IL-12 (Fig 3A), consistent with previous reports showing IL-12 induction after CD40 engagement [33]. Importantly, treatment with CD40LT significantly enhanced production of IL-6 and IL-23, which are key cytokines for Th17 polarization and expansion (Fig 3A). IL-1β, which also promotes Th17 differentiation in combination with IL-6 and IL-23, was not altered by treatment with CD40LT (Fig 3A). Moreover, CD40LT-treated Mtb-infected DCs induced significantly higher levels of IL-17 from co-cultured ESAT-6 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells compared to Mtb-infected DCs lacking CD40 engagement (Fig 3B). In contrast, CD40LT-treatment did not alter production of IFN-γ from antigen-specific CD4 T cells in vitro (Fig 3B). These data show that CD40 engagement augments antigen-specific IL-17 generation.
Costimulatory signals synergize with antigen-specific signals downstream of T cell receptor (TCR) ligation to promote full activation of T cells. Absence of signaling through the CD80/86-CD28 costimulatory pathway, for example, results in suboptimal T cell activation and anergic responses [29, 30, 34, 35]. CD28 signaling is thought to function by lowering the T cell activation threshold, thus facilitating optimal T cell activation and IL-2 production. To investigate whether CD40 engagement on DCs similarly impacts the activation threshold of Mtb-specific T cells and whether this, in turn, influences IL-17 production, Mtb-infected DCs were either treated with CD40LT or left untreated, pulsed with increasing concentrations of ESAT-61–20 peptide, and co-cultured with ESAT-6 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells. We found that CD40LT-treated DCs displayed an enhanced capacity to induce IL-17 responses at all antigen doses compared to untreated conditions (Fig 3C). The ability of Mtb-infected DCs to induce IL-17 at lower concentrations of peptide after CD40LT treatment suggests that signals induced by CD40 engagement lowers the threshold for antigen-specific production of IL-17. Thus, CD40-dependent costimulation may serve to overcome suboptimal generation of IL-17 responses elicited early in Mtb infection when antigen levels are low.
In order to dissect the relative contributions of Th17-polarizing cytokines and CD40-CD40L interaction on IL-17 responses, Mtb-infected DCs were treated with or without CD40LT and then co-cultured with ESAT-6 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells in the presence of the MR1 CD40L-blocking antibody as described in Fig 2B. Interestingly, antibody blockade of CD40-CD40L interaction significantly decreased antigen-specific IL-17 responses even in the presence of CD40LT (Fig 3D). These data suggest that exogenous engagement of CD40 on DCs that results in enhanced production of Th17-polarizing cytokines is not sufficient for generating antigen-specific IL-17 responses in a setting where CD40 cannot interact with CD40L on antigen-specific CD4 T cells.
CD40 engagement of Mtb-infected DCs induces antigen-specific Th17 in vivo
Induction of early IL-17 responses on mucosal surfaces of the lung is thought to be important for immunity to Mtb and inducing balanced Mtb-specific Th1/Th17 responses may enhance protective immunity. To determine whether CD40 engagement on DCs can enhance the induction of Mtb-specific lung Th17 responses in vivo, we utilized a mucosal transfer approach via intratracheal instillation of DCs. This approach allows for targeted manipulation of Mtb-infected DCs without potential confounding from off-target effects such as CD40 engagement of alveolar macrophages. Transferred DCs have been shown to prime adoptively transferred Mtb-antigen-specific T cells in lymph nodes and lungs of mice by 3 days post-intratracheal instillation [23].
We adoptively transferred naïve CD45.2+ ESAT-6 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells into CD45.1+ congenic hosts. The next day, we transferred DCs infected with Mtb in the presence or absence of CD40LT by intratracheal instillation (Fig 4A). At 6 and 12 days after DC transfer, we assessed Th17 responses in the lungs and MLN by determining the expression of IL-17 and RORγt in CD45.2+ ESAT-6-specific CD4 T cells by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and flow cytometry. Engaging CD40 on Mtb-infected DCs using CD40LT enhanced the frequency of ESAT-6-specific RORγt+IL-17+ T cells in the lungs (Fig 4B) and MLN (Fig 4C). Notably, the majority of IL-17+ cells expressed RORγt, the transcription factor that determines Th17 lineage commitment [36], indicating that CD40LT-treated Mtb-infected DCs polarized CD4 T cells into Th17 cells.
Enhanced antigen-specific Th17 responses in the lungs and MLN of mice following transfer of CD40LT-engaged Mtb-infected DCs or hip1 mutant Mtb-infected DCs
To determine Th1 and Th17 responses in the lungs and MLN of mice at 6 and 12 days after intratracheal instillation of DCs, we assessed IFN-γ and IL-17 production in CD45.2+ ESAT-6 TCR-Tg T cells by flow cytometry (Fig 5A). Transfer of Mtb-infected DCs that were treated with CD40LT resulted in a greater expansion of ESAT-6 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells compared to Mtb DCs that did not receive exogenous CD40LT, and was comparable to the expansion of ESAT-6 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells in response to hip1 mutant Mtb-infected DCs (Fig 5B). Moreover, transfer of CD40LT-treated, Mtb-infected DCs significantly enhanced the frequencies of antigen-specific Th17 cells in lungs and MLN compared to Mtb-infected DCs alone and was comparable to the Th17 frequencies elicited by hip1 mutant Mtb-infected DCs (Fig 5C). We also observed higher frequencies of antigen-specific IFN-γ+ CD4 T cells in the lung, but not MLN, on day 6 post-intratracheal transfer of either Mtb-infected CD40LT-treated DCs or hip1 mutant Mtb-infected DCs compared to their untreated counterpart (Fig 5D). 12 days after intratracheal instillation of DCs, CD45.2+ ESAT-6-specific IFN-γ responses in the lungs were comparable, suggesting that DCs that did not receive CD40LT were delayed in inducing Th1 responses relative to Mtb-infected CD40LT-treated and hip1 mutant Mtb-infected DCs. Interestingly, antigen-specific CD4 T cells producing IL-17 and IFN-γ were mutually exclusive populations and double producing cells were not detected. These data demonstrate that engagement of the CD40 pathway can overcome deficits in Th17 generation during Mtb infection and leads to enhanced antigen-specific Th1 and Th17 responses in vivo.
CD40 engagement of DCs enhances control of Mtb infection
DCs loaded with Mtb antigens have been previously shown to confer better anti-mycobacterial immunity than BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) vaccination in mouse models [37, 38]. Therefore, DC-based vaccination provides a useful model to study the impact of boosting CD40-engagement on priming of antigen-specific T cell pools and on the control of Mtb infection in vivo. We exposed DCs to heat-killed (HK) Mtb followed by treatment with CD40LT. DCs stimulated with HK Mtb and CD40LT were equivalent to ex vivo assays using live Mtb (S3 Fig). Comparison groups included transfer of uninfected DCs, DCs stimulated with HK wild type Mtb or with HK hip1 mutant Mtb. Upon transfer of antigen-loaded DCs into mouse lungs by intratracheal instillation, we assessed immune responses generated by transferred DCs by measuring the activation of endogenous CD4 T cell responses and frequencies of Th17 and Th1 cells in the lungs of mice 6 and 12 days after DC transfer. 15 days after DC transfer, we challenged mice with low-dose aerosolized Mtb. At 5 weeks post-challenge (day 50), we determined lung bacterial burden and Mtb-specific Th1 and Th17 responses (Fig 6A).
CD40LT treatment induced significantly higher frequencies of activated CD44+ CD4 T cells (Fig 6B) and higher frequencies of lung IL-17+ CD4 T cells 6 and 12 days after DC transfer (Fig 6C). IFN-γ+ CD4 T cell frequencies were higher on day 6 in mice receiving CD40LT-treated DCs compared to untreated Mtb-DCs, but were comparable by day 12. As expected, transfer of hip1 mutant Mtb-stimulated DCs induced robust Th17 and Th1 responses in the lungs of mice on day 6 and day 12 post-DC transfer. Following aerosol challenge with low dose Mtb 15 days after intratracheal transfer of DCs, we assessed bacterial burden in the lungs of mice 5 weeks after challenge by plating for CFU. As shown in Fig 6D, transfer of DCs stimulated with HK Mtb resulted in significant reductions in lung bacterial burden at day 50 compared to transfer of DCs alone. Interestingly, CD40LT treatment reduced bacterial burden even further, showing that boosting CD40-CD40L interactions could overcome pathogen-mediated impairment of CD40 costimulation and promote enhanced anti-mycobacterial immunity. Notably, transfer of DCs exposed to hip1 mutant Mtb also showed comparable reductions in bacterial burden. These results are consistent with our previous report showing that hip1 mutant Mtb inherently induces superior DC responses compared to wild type Mtb, i.e., significantly higher induction of Th1- and Th17-polarizing cytokines, higher expression of CD40, enhanced antigen presentation and balanced Th1/Th17 responses [21]. To assess Mtb-specific Th1 and Th17 responses in the lungs of mice post-challenge, we stimulated lung cells ex vivo with Mtb whole cell lysate (WCL) and determined IFN-γ+ and IL-17+ CD4 T cell frequencies by flow cytometry. We found significantly enhanced Th17 responses in mice that intratracheally received CD40LT-treated DCs or hip1 mutant Mtb-stimulated DCs compared to those that received Mtb-stimulated DCs. However, there was no discernible difference between the groups in terms of lung CD4 IFN-γ responses (Fig 6E). Importantly, lung IL-17 responses inversely correlated with bacterial burden, while there was no significant correlation between IFN-γ responses and lung bacterial burden (Fig 6F). Our data show that we can improve protection against Mtb challenge by overcoming Mtb-mediated impairments in CD40 costimulation.
Discussion
The findings in this study identify the CD40-CD40L pathway as a critical mechanism for the generation of antigen-specific Th17 responses and highlight the importance of DC-T cell crosstalk in immunity to Mtb infection. Importantly, we provide insights into improving adaptive immunity to TB by augmenting the functions of DCs and show that exogenously engaging CD40 on DCs significantly enhances control of Mtb burden in the lungs of infected mice.
Costimulatory signals provided by antigen presenting cells such as macrophages and DCs are critical for full activation of naïve antigen-specific CD4 T cells and promote their rapid expansion into cytokine-producing effector cells, which exert their antimicrobial functions at the site of infection. While differentiation of activated CD4 T cells into IFN-γ+ Th1 subsets is relatively well understood, the molecular mechanisms underlying the generation of Th17 cells, particularly during Mtb infection, are less clear. Moreover, the mechanisms by which Mtb induces delayed, suboptimal T cell immunity, which enables the pathogen to successfully evade adaptive immunity and persist within the host, remain poorly understood. Several studies, including our own, have shown that Mtb impairs antigen presentation in infected DCs and dampens production of Th17-polarizing cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-23 and IL-1β [21, 22, 24, 39–41]. However, very little was known about the role of costimulatory pathways in driving Th17 development in TB prior to our study. Our work shows that innate cytokines are important for the generation of IL-17 responses (Figs 1 and 3) and is consistent with other studies showing a critical role for CD40-dependent IL-6 and IL-23 in the induction and expansion of Th17 cells [42–44]. Interestingly, our results show that blocking CD40-CD40L interaction with MR1 attenuates IL-17 responses to Mtb-infected DCs despite treatment of DCs with CD40LT, which suggests that optimal induction of IL-17 to Mtb infection requires CD40-CD40L interaction (Fig 3D). However, studies have shown that exogenous addition of supraphysiological levels of Th17-polarizing cytokines can drive CD40-/- DCs to induce IL-17 [42]. Our data suggest that costimulatory interactions between Mtb-infected DCs and T cells are required for optimal generation of IL-17 responses. In addition, localization of CD4 T cells in close proximity to infected DCs is likely to be an important determinant of the type of antigen-specific CD4 T cells mobilized after infection. Recent work has demonstrated that uninfected MLN-resident DCs acquire antigen from infected lung DCs and can prime Mtb-specific CD4 T cells to produce IFN-γ [23]. It is possible that while MLN-resident DCs acquire antigen, their maturation status and costimulatory capacity may be suboptimal without Mtb infection and, thus, not amenable to generating CD4 T cell responses beyond IFN-γ. Moreover, within the Th1 subset, studies have shown distinct IFN-γ-producing CD4 T cells in the vasculature and parenchyma of Mtb-infected mice [45]. However, localization of Th17 cells within lung compartments and the role of lung-specific DC subsets in driving the polarization of Th1 and Th17 during Mtb infection are poorly understood. Our study uses bone marrow derived DCs and therefore the extent to which our experiments model in vivo-generated lung DCs needs to be investigated further. Overall, our data showing that CD40-CD40L interaction is required for optimal Th17 generation in response to Mtb and that boosting CD40-CD40L interactions augments Th1 and Th17 responses suggests that restriction of costimulatory pathways is an important virulence mechanism used by Mtb for inducing suboptimal T-helper responses that benefits the pathogen.
Our finding that exogenous induction of CD40-mediated costimulation, via CD40LT treatment, is able to elicit IL-17 production at lower concentrations of peptide stimulation (Fig 3) than by Mtb-infected DCs alone leads to an interesting speculation. In early stages of Mtb infection, low levels of antigen in the lung, combined with impaired CD40 induction on Mtb-infected DCs, likely results in suboptimal costimulation of naïve CD4 T cells and therefore suboptimal and delayed induction of Th17 responses. However, engaging the CD40-CD40L pathway and promoting interactions between these two molecules likely facilitates better Th17 generation, even when lung antigen levels are low during early stages of infection. It has been reported that higher peptide concentrations are required for inducing Th17 polarization compared to Th1 in a study that examined activation of Smarta-2 TCR-Tg T cells [42]. Efficient CD40-mediated costimulation may serve to lower the threshold for T cell activation and Th17 polarization, and overcome the need for high antigen loads. Interestingly, hip1 mutant Mtb-loaded DCs induced higher Th17 responses compared to wild type Mtb, even without CD40LT treatment (Fig 5), and enhanced protection (Fig 6). We have previously shown that hip1 mutant Mtb induces high levels of CD40 and Th17 responses [21]. Therefore, it is likely that elimination of Hip1 results in efficient CD40-dependent costimulation, and bypasses the need for exogenous engagement of the CD40-CD40L pathway. However, we do not rule out the possibility that hip1 mutant Mtb activates alternate DC pathways that promote robust T cell immunity and further investigation into the common and exclusive immune pathways activated by CD40LT and hip1 mutant Mtb is of interest.
Previous work by Demangel et al demonstrated that lung Th1 responses can be augmented by transferring BCG-infected DCs in conjunction with agonistic anti-CD40 mAb [33]. However, this approach did not significantly restrict Mtb lung burdens following challenge compared to BCG-infected DCs alone. We speculate that the use of heat killed Mtb in our study as well as the timing of the aerosol challenge at 2 weeks after intratracheal instillation of DCs (in contrast to 2 days post-DC transfer in the Demangel et al study) likely established higher frequencies of antigen-specific Th17 and Th1 precursors, leading to better control of Mtb. Additionally, recent work by Griffiths et al showed that mice vaccinated with BCG followed by intratracheal delivery of Ag85B peptide loaded DCs, one day before and four days after challenge with Mtb HN878, had enhanced bacterial control [46]. Interestingly, they achieved similar reductions in bacterial burden after administration of TLR-9 and CD40 agonists together with Ag85B peptide and also showed higher levels of lung IFN-γ and IL-17 responses. The study by Griffiths et al complements our results, which provide mechanistic evidence that the CD40-CD40L pathway is critical for the generation of Mtb-specific lung Th17 responses. While IL-17 responses appear to be required for resistance against infection with the hypervirulent Mtb HN878 strain, IL-17 may also be important for generating efficacious vaccine-induced immunity. Our data show an association between enhanced IL-17 responses and lower bacterial burden after aerosol Mtb challenge (Fig 6F), but do not directly link Th17 responses with increased protection. While we have demonstrated that engaging CD40 on DCs confers enhanced Th17 responses in the lungs in a setting of mucosal DC transfer, we also observed augmented Th1 responses in vivo prior to challenge (Figs 5 and 6). Therefore, our data demonstrate that CD40 engagement on DCs improves adaptive immunity to TB, likely due to induction of a balanced Th1/Th17 response. Although we have not shown that the Th17 cells generated in the lung following transfer of DCs stimulated with HK Mtb + CD40LT or HK hip1 mutant Mtb are directly responsible for the increased protection seen in Fig 6, our studies provide a platform to further investigate the potential of designing vaccination strategies that overcome Mtb immune evasion, either by augmenting CD40 costimulation and/or deletion of immunomodulatory factors such as hip1 (in BCG or other live attenuated Mtb vaccine strains) that impair DC functions.
Our studies on understanding the role of CD40 costimulation in Th17 responses significantly extend our understanding of the CD40-CD40L pathway during infection, as previous investigations studying this pathway in TB as well as in other infections have focused on Th1 responses. CD40 has been shown to promote Th1 responses by synergizing with TLR signaling to induce high levels of IL-12 production from antigen presenting cells in several infections [33, 47, 48]. While our own data show that CD40-/- DCs and CD40LT-treated DCs infected with Mtb do not affect IFN-γ responses in a closed system in vitro (Figs 1 and 3), treatment of Mtb-infected DCs with CD40LT does augment IFN-γ responses in the lungs 6 days after intratracheal instillation of DCs (Figs 5 and 6), suggesting that engaging the CD40-CD40L pathway enhances both Th1 and Th17 responses in vivo and may lead to a more balanced Th1/Th17 immunity to TB. Engagement of CD40 is not uniquely important for Th17 generation, as previous investigations on the role of CD40 in mycobacterial diseases have supported the importance of CD40 in the amplification of Th1 responses. CD40-/- mice were shown to be susceptible to aerosol infection with Mtb due to a defective Th1 response [28], but CD40lg-/- mice were reported to be resistant to Mtb infection and capable of establishing Th1 immunity [28, 49]. Together with our data showing that Mtb poorly induces CD40 expression on infected DCs [21], these studies suggest that, while CD40L may be dispensable for generating Th1 responses that control bacterial burden, engaging the CD40-CD40L pathway may be important for generating balanced Th1/Th17 responses that may better control Mtb infection. Moreover, while IL-17 responses were not examined in those studies, mucosal Th17 cells are also likely to contribute to controlling Mtb in CD40-/- mice in vivo; this may be dependent on antigen load as the reported susceptibility of CD40-/- mice disappeared after high dose aerosol challenge [28]. Our work showing that promoting CD40-CD40L interaction augments early Th17 responses in the lung (Figs 5 and 6) is consistent with several previous reports showing an important role for Th17 cells in protection at mucosal surfaces such as in the lung and intestine [18, 19, 50, 51]. In TB, it has been suggested that Th17 cells in the lung may act directly on infected cells or by recruiting additional immune cells, such as IFN-γ+ Th1, to combat infection. Notably, in Figs 5 and 6, we show that intratracheal instillation of Mtb-infected DCs treated with CD40LT is associated with an earlier IFN-γ response in the lungs compared to Mtb-DC, which supports the idea that induction of early antigen-specific Th17 can serve to recruit antigen-specific Th1 cells. Our work highlights the importance of augmenting DC costimulation in order to improve adaptive immunity to TB and provides evidence that specifically augmenting DCs through CD40 can enhance antigen-specific mucosal immunity.
The generation of robust antigen-specific immunity that goes beyond IFN-γ-producing Th1 responses is an important consideration for vaccines and host-directed therapeutics for TB. The IL-12/STAT-1/IFN-γ axis is important for the control of Mtb, but robust induction of IFN-γ alone does not correlate with enhanced protection against developing TB disease in a variety of vaccine trials [6, 7], and there is mounting evidence for IFN-γ independent and Th17-mediated mechanisms of Mtb control [9, 52, 53]. In fact, recent work in mice has demonstrated that IFN-γ plays a more important role in control of bacterial burden at extra-pulmonary sites such as the spleen and must be restrained to prevent lung pathology [54]. In humans, bi-allelic mutations in RORC, leading to abrogated IL-17 responses, is associated with susceptibility to mycobacteria, suggesting a role for IL-17 responses in human TB [55]. In addition, the emerging importance of mucosal Th17 responses in protective and vaccine-induced immunity to Mtb [18, 19, 51] highlights the need to design and evaluate candidate vaccines that induce robust early Th17 responses. It is important to keep in mind, however, that unbalanced production of IL-17 can be pathogenic [56]. Over-exuberant induction of IL-17 at non-mucosal sites via repeated subcutaneous BCG exposure can lead to worsening of disease [57] and damaging neutrophilia, while IFN-γ receptor signaling limits excessive Th17-mediated neutrophilia [58]. In this context, future studies aimed at augmenting CD40 costimulation would benefit from studying how augmenting this pathway impacts neutrophil responses.
In summary, our studies demonstrate a novel role for CD40 costimulation in generating Th17 responses in TB and show that augmenting the CD40-CD40L pathway, either through DC-targeted strategies or deletion of immune-evasion genes in the pathogen, can bolster adaptive immunity in TB. Our results indicate that targeting DC costimulatory pathways in the context of subunit vaccines or live attenuated vaccines represents a novel strategy to induce balanced Th1/Th17 immunity and improve control of Mtb infection.
Material and methods
Ethics statement
All experiments using animals or tissue derived from animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Emory University (Protocol number YER-2003476-060919GN). Experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health.
Bacterial strains
Mtb H37Rv was grown as described previously [21, 40]. Briefly, bacteria were grown at 37°C in Middlebrook 7H9 broth or 7H10 agar supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), 0.5% glycerol, and 0.05% Tween 80 (for broth), with the addition of 25 μg/ml kanamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for hip1 mutant Mtb. For heat inactivation, bacterial stocks in 7H9 were grown to midlog phase, sonicated, washed twice with PBS and inactivated at 80°C for 2 hours.
Mice
All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in filter-top cages within the vivarium at the Yerkes National Primate Center, Emory University, and provided with sterile water and food ad libitum. C57BL/6, and C57BL/6 CD45.1+ congenic mice, CD80-/-CD86-/-, and CD40-/- mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. OT-II TCR Tg mice specific for OVA323–339 peptide were obtained from Dr. Bali Pulendran (originally generated in the laboratory of Dr. F. Carbone, University of Melbourne), and TCR-Tg mice specific for early secreted antigenic target 6 (ESAT-6)1–20/I-Ab epitope were obtained from Dr. Andrea Cooper (Trudeau Institute) and were bred at the Yerkes animal facility. CD40lg-/- x OT-II Tg mice were obtained from Dr. Mandy Ford (Emory University) and bred at the Yerkes animal facility.
Generation of bone marrow derived dendritic cells
For generating murine bone marrow derived DCs, bone marrow cells from indicated strains of mice were flushed from excised femurs and tibias and grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Lonza, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT), 2 mM glutamine, 1x β-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1x nonessential amino acids, and 20 ng/ml murine recombinant GM-CSF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Incubations were carried out at 37°C with 5% CO2. Fresh medium with GM-CSF (20ng/ml) was added on days 3 and 6, and cells were used on day 8 for all experiments. We routinely obtained >85% CD11c+ CD11b+ MHCII+ cell purity by flow cytometry. DCs were further purified using CD11c microbead kits as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA).
Mtb infection of DCs
3x105 CD11c-purified bone marrow derived DCs were plated onto 24-well plates overnight prior to infection. For live infections, bacteria were filtered through 5 μm filters, resuspended in complete medium, and sonicated twice for 5 seconds before addition to the adherent monolayers. Bacteria were used for infection (in triplicate) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 or as indicated. Infection of DCs was carried out for 4 hours, after which monolayers were incubated with amikacin (200 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 minutes to kill extracellular bacteria and then washed four times with PBS before incubating in complete medium. To determine bacterial input, a set of wells was lysed in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and plated onto 7H10 agar plates for CFU enumeration after 21 days. For stimulation of DCs with heat killed Mtb, DC were exposed to heat-killed Mtb at an MOI of 10 in complete medium as determined by CFU enumerated from bacterial stocks prior to heat killing. Uninfected DCs were used as controls for each experiment. For some experiments, DCs were treated with multimeric CD40LT reagent (Adipogen) concurrent with infection or stimulation. Cell free supernatants were collected after 24 hours to assay for cytokines: IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-6, IL-1β (BD OptEIA, San Jose, CA) and IL-23 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) by ELISA according to manufacturers’ instructions.
DC-T cell co-culture assays
CD4 T cells were purified from single-cell suspensions of spleen and lymph nodes from 6–8 week old transgenic mice (Naïve CD4 negative selection kit, Stemcell Technologies) of the indicated strain. Purified CD4 T cells show ≥ 99% purity by FACS analysis. DCs were incubated with 10 μg/ml (or as indicated) of OVA323–339 or ESAT-61−20 peptide for 6 hours, washed with PBS, and infected with Mtb with or without CD40LT for 24 hours. DCs were then washed twice with PBS and co-cultured with antigen-specific CD4 T cells to achieve a 1:4 DC:T cell ratio for 72 hours. Cell free supernatants collected from co-cultured cells were analyzed for IFN-γ (Mabtech, Cincinnati, OH), IL-17 (ELISA Ready-Set-Go, eBioscience), and IL-2 (BD Biosciences) by ELISA according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Blockade of CD40-CD40L pathway
2x104 CD11c-purified DCs were seeded in 96-well plates overnight, pulsed with relevant peptide and treated with the indicated conditions for 24 hours. Afterwards, purified antigen-specific CD4 T cells were incubated with 20 μg/ml anti-CD40L (clone MR1) blocking antibody and co-cultured with DCs to achieve a 1:10 DC:T cell ratio. Co-cultured cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 hours prior to harvest of supernatants for ELISAs.
Intratracheal instillation of DCs and tissue harvest
CD11c-purified DCs were stimulated with indicated conditions for 24 hours. DCs were then washed twice and resuspended in sterile PBS at 1x106/50 ul and injected intratracheally into isoflurane-anesthetized mice. For some experiments, recipient mice (CD45.1+) received purified 1x106 ESAT-61−20 TCR-Tg CD4 T cells (CD45.2+) one day prior to DC instillation by tail-vein injection. 6 and 12 days post-intratracheal instillation, lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes were harvested. Lungs were digested with 1 mg/ml collagenase D (Worthington) at 37°C for 30 min. For some experiments, the upper right lobe of the lung was used for determining CFU and the rest of the lung was used for cellular assays. Homogenized single-cell lung suspensions were obtained through mechanical disruption and filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer (BD Biosciences), treated with RBC lysis buffer for 3–5 min, and washed twice with cell culture media. Cells were counted and used to set up stimulations for intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. Single cell suspensions were stimulated with media, ESAT-61−20 (10 μg/ml), Mtb whole cell lysate (10 μg/ml), or PMA (80 ng/ml) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml) as indicated. BFA (5 μg/ml) and monensin (1:1500) were added to the stimulated cells after 1.5 hours and cells were cultured for an additional 4.5 hours, or 16 hours for whole cell lysate stimulations, and then stained for flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry
Live cells were discriminated by a live/dead fixable aqua dead cell stain (Molecular Probes). For staining DCs, murine anti-CD11c PE-Cy7 (clone N418, eBioscience), anti-CD11b APC-Cy7 (clone M1/70, Biolegend), anti-CD40 PE-Cy5 (clone 1C10, eBioscience), anti-CD86 APC (clone GL1, eBioscience), and anti–MHC II PE (clone M5/114.15.2, BD) were utilized. For staining T cells, murine anti-CD3 V450 (clone 500A2, BD), anti-CD4 Alexa700 (clone RM4-5, BD), anti-CD8 PerCP (clone 53–6.7, BD), anti-TCR γδ BV605 (clone GL3, Biolegend), anti-CD44 APC-Cy7 (clone IM7, BD), anti-CD45.1 BV785 (clone A20, BioLegend), and anti-CD45.2 BV650 (clone 104, BioLegend) were utilized to stain for surface markers. Murine anti-RORγt PE (clone B2D, eBioscience), anti-TNFa PE-Cy7 (clone MP6-XT22, BD), anti-IFN-γ APC (clone XMG1.2, eBioscience), anti-IL-2 FITC (clone JES6-5H4, BD), and anti-IL-17 PE-CF594 (clone TC11-18H10, BD) were stained intracellularly with the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm or BD Transcription Factor kit as per manufacturer’s instructions. Staining for cell-surface markers was done by resuspending ∼1-2x106 cells in 100 ml PBS with 2% FBS containing the antibody mixture at 4°C for 30 min and then washing with PBS containing 2% FBS. Data were immediately acquired using an LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR).
Aerogenic infection of mice with Mtb
Mtb H37Rv was grown to OD600 of ∼0.6–0.8, washed two times in 1× PBS. 1-ml aliquots were frozen at −80°C and used for infection after thawing. Single-cell suspensions of these aliquots were used to deliver ∼100 CFU into 8–10 week old C57BL/6J mice using an aerosol apparatus manufactured by In-Tox Products (Moriarty, NM). Bacterial burden was estimated by plating serial dilutions of the lung homogenates on 7H10 agar plates on day 1 (for entry) or as indicated. CFU was enumerated after 21 days.
Statistical analyses
The statistical significance of data was analyzed using the Student’s unpaired t-test for comparisons between two groups or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey posttest correction for multiple comparisons for analysis of two or more groups (GraphPad Prism 6.0h). In order to calculate correlation, a linear regression was utilized to generate a best-fit line and Spearman’s correlation coefficient calculated (GraphPad Prism 6.0h). Data are shown as mean ±S.D. of one representative experiment from multiple independent experiments.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We gratefully thank Dana Tedesco and Dr. Arash Grakoui for anti-CD40L blocking antibody (MR1) and helpful input on CD40L blockade assays; Drs. David Pinelli and Mandy Ford for CD40lg-/- x OT-II TCR transgenic mice and input on breeding strategy; Dr. Joel Ernst for aid with intratracheal instillation technique. We also thank Melanie Quezada and members of the Rengarajan lab for helpful discussions.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health: 5R01AI083366-05 and 2R56AI083366-06A1 (to JR), a Yerkes National Primate Center base grant: RR000165 and a Center for AIDS research (CFAR) Immunology Core grant (to Emory University): P30AI050409. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Ernst JD. The immunological life cycle of tuberculosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(8):581–91. doi: 10.1038/nri3259 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Robinson RT, Orme IM, Cooper AM. The onset of adaptive immunity in the mouse model of tuberculosis and the factors that compromise its expression. Immunological Reviews. 2015;264(1):46–59. Epub 2015/02/24. doi: 10.1111/imr.12259 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reiley WW, Calayag MD, Wittmer ST, Huntington JL, Pearl JE, Fountain JJ, et al. ESAT-6-specific CD4 T cell responses to aerosol Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are initiated in the mediastinal lymph nodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(31):10961–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801496105 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2504808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Urdahl KB, Shafiani S, Ernst JD. Initiation and regulation of T-cell responses in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4(3):288–93. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.10 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3206635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wolf AJ, Desvignes L, Linas B, Banaiee N, Tamura T, Takatsu K, et al. Initiation of the adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends on antigen production in the local lymph node, not the lungs. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2008;205(1):105–15. Epub 2007/12/26. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071367 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2234384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tameris MD, Hatherill M, Landry BS, Scriba TJ, Snowden MA, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9871):1021–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60177-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5424647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Andersen P, Urdahl KB. TB vaccines; promoting rapid and durable protection in the lung. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2015;35:55–62. Epub 2015/06/27. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.06.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4641675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhatt K, Verma S, Ellner JJ, Salgame P. Quest for correlates of protection against tuberculosis. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2015;22(3):258–66. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00721-14 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4340894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wozniak TM, Saunders BM, Ryan AA, Britton WJ. Mycobacterium bovis BCG-specific Th17 cells confer partial protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the absence of gamma interferon. Infection and Immunity. 2010;78(10):4187–94. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01392-09 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2950338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scriba TJ, Kalsdorf B, Abrahams DA, Isaacs F, Hofmeister J, Black G, et al. Distinct, specific IL-17- and IL-22-producing CD4+ T cell subsets contribute to the human anti-mycobacterial immune response. Journal of Immunology. 2008;180(3):1962–70. D—NLM: PMC2219462. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2219462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Okamoto Yoshida Y, Umemura M, Yahagi A, O'Brien RL, Ikuta K, Kishihara K, et al. Essential role of IL-17A in the formation of a mycobacterial infection-induced granuloma in the lung. Journal of Immunology. 2010;184(8):4414–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903332 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khader SA, Guglani L, Rangel-Moreno J, Gopal R, Junecko BA, Fountain JJ, et al. IL-23 is required for long-term control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and B cell follicle formation in the infected lung. Journal of Immunology. 2011;187(10):5402–7. Epub 2011/10/18. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101377 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3208087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Freches D, Korf H, Denis O, Havaux X, Huygen K, Romano M. Mice genetically inactivated in interleukin-17A receptor are defective in long-term control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunology. 2013;140(2):220–31. doi: 10.1111/imm.12130 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3784168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gopal R, Monin L, Slight S, Uche U, Blanchard E, Fallert Junecko BA, et al. Unexpected role for IL-17 in protective immunity against hypervirulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis HN878 infection. PLoS Pathogens. 2014;10(5):e1004099 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004099 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4022785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cruz A, Torrado E, Carmona J, Fraga AG, Costa P, Rodrigues F, et al. BCG vaccination-induced long-lasting control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis correlates with the accumulation of a novel population of CD4(+)IL-17(+)TNF(+)IL-2(+) T cells. Vaccine. 2015;33(1):85–91. Epub 2014/12/03. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Khader SA, Bell GK, Pearl JE, Fountain JJ, Rangel-Moreno J, Cilley GE, et al. IL-23 and IL-17 in the establishment of protective pulmonary CD4+ T cell responses after vaccination and during Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge. Nature Immunology. 2007;8(4):369–77. Epub 2007/03/14. doi: 10.1038/ni1449 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Torrado E, Cooper AM. IL-17 and Th17 cells in tuberculosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21(6):455–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2010.10.004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3032416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gopal R, Lin Y, Obermajer N, Slight S, Nuthalapati N, Ahmed M, et al. IL-23-dependent IL-17 drives Th1-cell responses following Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(2):364–73. doi: 10.1002/eji.201141569 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3490408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gopal R, Rangel-Moreno J, Slight S, Lin Y, Nawar HF, Fallert Junecko BA, et al. Interleukin-17-dependent CXCL13 mediates mucosal vaccine-induced immunity against tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6(5):972–84. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.135 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3732523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rengarajan J, Murphy E, Park A, Krone CL, Hett EC, Bloom BR, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2224c modulates innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(1):264–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710601105 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2224198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Madan-Lala R, Sia JK, King R, Adekambi T, Monin L, Khader SA, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis impairs dendritic cell functions through the serine hydrolase Hip1. Journal of Immunology. 2014;192(9):4263–72. Epub 2014/03/25. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1303185 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3995873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wolf AJ, Linas B, Trevejo-Nunez GJ, Kincaid E, Tamura T, Takatsu K, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects dendritic cells with high frequency and impairs their function in vivo. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(4):2509–19. Epub 2007/08/07. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Srivastava S, Ernst JD. Cell-to-cell transfer of M. tuberculosis antigens optimizes CD4 T cell priming. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(6):741–52. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.007 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4098643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grace PS, Ernst JD. Suboptimal Antigen Presentation Contributes to Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis In Vivo. Journal of Immunology. 2016;196(1):357–64. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501494 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4684992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merad M, Sathe P, Helft J, Miller J, Mortha A. The dendritic cell lineage: ontogeny and function of dendritic cells and their subsets in the steady state and the inflamed setting. Annual Review of Immunology. 2013;31:563–604. Epub 2013/03/23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074950 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3853342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sia JK, Georgieva M, Rengarajan J. Innate Immune Defenses in Human Tuberculosis: An Overview of the Interactions between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Innate Immune Cells. Journal of Immunology Research. 2015;2015:747543 Epub 2015/08/11. doi: 10.1155/2015/747543 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4516846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Srivastava S, Ernst JD, Desvignes L. Beyond macrophages: the diversity of mononuclear cells in tuberculosis. Immunological Reviews. 2014;262(1):179–92. doi: 10.1111/imr.12217 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4203409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lazarevic V, Myers AJ, Scanga CA, Flynn JL. CD40, but not CD40L, is required for the optimal priming of T cells and control of aerosol M. tuberculosis infection. Immunity. 2003;19(6):823–35. Epub 2003/12/13. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jenkins MK, Taylor PS, Norton SD, Urdahl KB. CD28 delivers a costimulatory signal involved in antigen-specific IL-2 production by human T cells. Journal of Immunology. 1991;147(8):2461–6. Epub 1991/10/15. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Norton SD, Zuckerman L, Urdahl KB, Shefner R, Miller J, Jenkins MK. The CD28 ligand, B7, enhances IL-2 production by providing a costimulatory signal to T cells. Journal of Immunology. 1992;149(5):1556–61. Epub 1992/09/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annual Review of Immunology. 2009;27:485–517. Epub 2009/01/10. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132710 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ferrer IR, Liu D, Pinelli DF, Koehn BH, Stempora LL, Ford ML. CD40/CD154 blockade inhibits dendritic cell expression of inflammatory cytokines but not costimulatory molecules. Journal of Immunology. 2012;189(9):4387–95. Epub 2012/09/25. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201757 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3478479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Demangel C, Palendira U, Feng CG, Heath AW, Bean AG, Britton WJ. Stimulation of dendritic cells via CD40 enhances immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infection and Immunity. 2001;69(4):2456–61. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2456-2461.2001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC98179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harris NL, Ronchese F. The role of B7 costimulation in T-cell immunity. Immunology and Cell Biology. 1999;77(4):304–11. Epub 1999/08/24. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.1999.00835.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rengarajan J, Tang B, Glimcher LH. NFATc2 and NFATc3 regulate T(H)2 differentiation and modulate TCR-responsiveness of naive T(H)cells. Nature Immunology. 2002;3(1):48–54. Epub 2001/12/12. doi: 10.1038/ni744 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ivanov II, McKenzie BS, Zhou L, Tadokoro CE, Lepelley A, Lafaille JJ, et al. The orphan nuclear receptor RORgammat directs the differentiation program of proinflammatory IL-17+ T helper cells. Cell. 2006;126(6):1121–33. Epub 2006/09/23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.035 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tascon RE, Soares CS, Ragno S, Stavropoulos E, Hirst EM, Colston MJ. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-activated dendritic cells induce protective immunity in mice. Immunology. 2000;99(3):473–80. D—NLM: PMC2327172. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2327172. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00963.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.McShane H, Behboudi S, Goonetilleke N, Brookes R, Hill AV. Protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis induced by dendritic cells pulsed with both CD8(+)- and CD4(+)-T-cell epitopes from antigen 85A. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70(3):1623–6. Epub 2002/02/21. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC127749. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.3.1623-1626.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Madan-Lala R, Peixoto KV, Re F, Rengarajan J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Hip1 dampens macrophage proinflammatory responses by limiting toll-like receptor 2 activation. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(12):4828–38. Epub 2011/09/29. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05574-11 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3232659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Naffin-Olivos JL, Georgieva M, Goldfarb N, Madan-Lala R, Dong L, Bizzell E, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Hip1 modulates macrophage responses through proteolysis of GroEL2. PLoS Pathogens. 2014;10(5):e1004132 Epub 2014/05/17. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004132 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4022732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hanekom WA, Mendillo M, Manca C, Haslett PA, Siddiqui MR, Barry C, 3rd, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibits maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells in vitro. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2003;188(2):257–66. Epub 2003/07/11. doi: 10.1086/376451 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Iezzi G, Sonderegger I, Ampenberger F, Schmitz N, Marsland BJ, Kopf M. CD40-CD40L cross-talk integrates strong antigenic signals and microbial stimuli to induce development of IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(3):876–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810769106 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2630101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Perona-Wright G, Jenkins SJ, O'Connor RA, Zienkiewicz D, McSorley HJ, Maizels RM, et al. A pivotal role for CD40-mediated IL-6 production by dendritic cells during IL-17 induction in vivo. Journal of Immunology. 2009;182(5):2808–15. Epub 2009/02/24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803553 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hsia BJ, Whitehead GS, Thomas SY, Nakano K, Gowdy KM, Aloor JJ, et al. Trif-dependent induction of Th17 immunity by lung dendritic cells. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8(1):186–97. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.56 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4267961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sakai S, Kauffman KD, Schenkel JM, McBerry CC, Mayer-Barber KD, Masopust D, et al. Cutting edge: control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by a subset of lung parenchyma-homing CD4 T cells. Journal of Immunology. 2014;192(7):2965–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400019 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4010124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Griffiths KL, Ahmed M, Das S, Gopal R, Horne W, Connell TD, et al. Targeting dendritic cells to accelerate T-cell activation overcomes a bottleneck in tuberculosis vaccine efficacy. Nature Communications. 2016;7:13894 Epub 2016/12/23. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13894 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5192216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schulz O, Edwards AD, Schito M, Aliberti J, Manickasingham S, Sher A, et al. CD40 triggering of heterodimeric IL-12 p70 production by dendritic cells in vivo requires a microbial priming signal. Immunity. 2000;13(4):453–62. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chandel HS, Pandey SP, Shukla D, Lalsare K, Selvaraj SK, Jha MK, et al. Toll-like receptors and CD40 modulate each other's expression affecting Leishmania major infection. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2014;176(2):283–90. Epub 2014/01/07. doi: 10.1111/cei.12264 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3992041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Campos-Neto A, Ovendale P, Bement T, Koppi TA, Fanslow WC, Rossi MA, et al. CD40 ligand is not essential for the development of cell-mediated immunity and resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Immunology. 1998;160(5):2037–41. Epub 1998/03/14. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ryan ES, Micci L, Fromentin R, Paganini S, McGary CS, Easley K, et al. Loss of Function of Intestinal IL-17 and IL-22 Producing Cells Contributes to Inflammation and Viral Persistence in SIV-Infected Rhesus Macaques. PLoS Pathogens. 2016;12(2):e1005412 Epub 2016/02/02. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005412 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4735119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aguilo N, Alvarez-Arguedas S, Uranga S, Marinova D, Monzon M, Badiola J, et al. Pulmonary but Not Subcutaneous Delivery of BCG Vaccine Confers Protection to Tuberculosis-Susceptible Mice by an Interleukin 17-Dependent Mechanism. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016;213(5):831–9. Epub 2015/10/24. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv503 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cowley SC, Elkins KL. CD4+ T cells mediate IFN-gamma-independent control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection both in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Immunology. 2003;171(9):4689–99. Epub 2003/10/22. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gallegos AM, van Heijst JW, Samstein M, Su X, Pamer EG, Glickman MS. A gamma interferon independent mechanism of CD4 T cell mediated control of M. tuberculosis infection in vivo. PLoS Pathogens. 2011;7(5):e1002052 Epub 2011/06/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002052 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3098235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sakai S, Kauffman KD, Sallin MA, Sharpe AH, Young HA, Ganusov VV, et al. CD4 T Cell-Derived IFN-gamma Plays a Minimal Role in Control of Pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Must Be Actively Repressed by PD-1 to Prevent Lethal Disease. PLoS Pathogens. 2016;12(5):e1005667 Epub 2016/06/01. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005667 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4887085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Okada S, Markle JG, Deenick EK, Mele F, Averbuch D, Lagos M, et al. Impairment of immunity to Candida and Mycobacterium in humans with bi-allelic RORC mutations. Science. 2015;349(6248):606–13. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4282 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4668938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cruz A, Khader SA, Torrado E, Fraga A, Pearl JE, Pedrosa J, et al. Cutting edge: IFN-gamma regulates the induction and expansion of IL-17-producing CD4 T cells during mycobacterial infection. Journal of Immunology. 2006;177(3):1416–20. Epub 2006/07/20. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cruz A, Fraga AG, Fountain JJ, Rangel-Moreno J, Torrado E, Saraiva M, et al. Pathological role of interleukin 17 in mice subjected to repeated BCG vaccination after infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2010;207(8):1609–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100265 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2916141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nandi B, Behar SM. Regulation of neutrophils by interferon-gamma limits lung inflammation during tuberculosis infection. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2011;208(11):2251–62. doi: 10.1084/jem.20110919 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3201199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.