Abstract
A deeper understanding of the conserved molecular mechanisms in different taxa have been made possible only because of the evolutionary conservation of crucial signaling pathways. In the present study, we explored the molecular evolutionary pattern of selection signatures in 51 species for 10 genes which are important components of NAD+/Sirtuin pathway and have already been directly linked to lifespan extension in worms and mice. Selection pressure analysis using PAML program revealed that MRPS5 and PPARGC1A were under significant constraints because of their functional significance. FOXO3a also displayed strong purifying selection. All three sirtuins, which were SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6, displayed a great degree of conservation between taxa, which is consistent with the previous report. A significant evolutionary constraint is seen on the anti-oxidant gene, SOD3. As expected, TP53 gene was under significant selection pressure in mammals, owing to its major role in tumor progression. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) genes displayed the most sites under positive selection. Further 3D structural analysis of PARP1 and PARP2 protein revealed that some of these positively selected sites caused a change in the electrostatic potential of the protein structure, which may allow a change in its interaction with other proteins and molecules ultimately leading to difference in the function. Although the functional significance of the positively selected sites could not be established in the variants databases, yet it will be interesting to see if these sites actually affect the function of PARP1 and PARP2.
Introduction
The comparative sequence analysis has been used to examine the relationship between nucleotide sequences of different species and has produced several evidences that support the hypothesis of common descent [1]. Plenty of examples prove that biochemical and molecular mechanisms are conserved across different taxa. The same biochemical processes operate in all known living organisms, such as the flow of genetic information, which is DNA to RNA to protein takes place through highly conserved ribosomes. In developmental biology, the common morphology is the result of the sharing of same genetic elements [2].
Many workers have reported that the molecular and biochemical mechanisms behind longevity assurance pathways are conserved in vertebrates and also in invertebrates up to certain extent [3–7]. Out of all the molecular pathways responsible for aging, insulin-like growth factor/insulin signaling (IIS) and target of rapamycin (TOR) pathways are the most conserved nutrient signaling pathways which alter growth, reproduction and metabolism in response to energy status, stress and nutrient availability. Genetic alterations that reduces signaling via these signaling networks have been shown to extend lifespan in yeast, worms, flies and mice, revealing a key evolutionarily conserved role in aging [8–10]. There have been an extensive molecular evolutionary analysis of IIS/TOR aging network which has uncovered substantial variation in IIS/TOR network within and among amniotes and provided a critical step to unlock information on vertebrate patterns of genetic regulation of metabolism, modes of reproduction and rates of aging [11].
Recently an interesting candidate longevity pathway which is NAD+/Sirtuin is gaining major attention because of its interplay with FOXO and mitochondrial UPR signaling [12]. NAD+ pathway have been shown to be present in a vast array of species and the vertebrate NAD metabolism is constantly undergoing functional diversification [13, 14]. The idea of NAD+ mediating the lifespan and health span extension by dietary restriction (DR) was put forward by Lin et al., (2004) [15]. Furthermore, Imai and group [16, 17] did a thorough research on the role of NAD+ and sirtuins in aging and diseases and documented that the defect in NAD+ level and consequently declined activity of sirtuins may accelerate the normal aging process. Also, they found that the NAD+ deficiency related pathologies can be normalized by supplementing with NAD+ precursors and intermediates. The role of NAD+ and sirtuins in aging and diseases have been reviewed in detail by Imai and Guarente [18] and they have highlighted the regulatory mechanisms by which NAD+ and its consuming enzymes sirtuins and PARPs regulate aging and disease states. It is well documented that NAD+ regulates metabolism and circadian rhythms through sirtuins and also NAD+ gets depleted during aging and diseases affecting the activity of sirtuins.
The NAD+/Sirtuin pathway improves life quality during aging and disease states by regulating metabolism, stress resistance, cell survival and proliferation, transcription, apoptosis, and autophagy. Sirtuin enzymes are coming up as competent therapeutic targets in cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases and inflammatory disorders. Alteration of sirtuin activity has been shown to affect the process of several aggregate-forming neurodegenerative disorders by changing the transcription factor activity and deacetylating the proteotoxic species [19].
Some reports have explicitly documented the regulation of longevity and metabolism through NAD+/sirtuin pathway in mice and worm [20, 12]. Modulation of NAD+ levels have a powerful metabolic impact because it serves as an obligatory substrate for the deacetylase activity of the sirtuin proteins [21–23]. The best-characterized mammalian sirtuin is SIRT1, which controls mitochondrial function through the deacetylation of targets that include PGC-1a and FOXO [24,7]. The administration of NAD+ precursors, such as nicotinamide mononucleotide [25] or nicotinamide riboside (NR) [26], has proven to be an efficient method to increase NAD+ levels and SIRT1 activity, improving metabolic homeostasis in mice. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a post-translational modification of proteins which regulates the various cellular pathways. This modification is reported to be majorly employed in eukaryotes and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase proteins (PARPs) are present in major eukaryotic supergroups, with exception of few eukaryotic species which lack PARP genes [27]. Furthermore, the NAD+-consuming PARPs, with PARP1 and PARP2 contributing to the main PARP activities in mammals, were classically described as DNA repair proteins [28, 29], but recent studies have linked these proteins to metabolism [30–33]. Indeed, genetic or pharmacological inactivation of PARP1 increased tissue NAD+ levels and activated mitochondrial metabolism [32]. An association between PARPs and lifespan has been postulated [34, 35], but a causal role remained unclear.
Though there have been few reports about the evolutionary analysis of genes involved in NAD+ biosynthesis and metabolism, yet the molecular evolutionary analysis of NAD+/Sirtuin pathway genes in the context of aging is not well explored. Therefore, the present study was designed to study the evolutionary forces acting on the NAD+/Sirtuin pathway regulated aging signaling. The present analysis is the first report which has highlighted the positive selection pressure acting upon all the above mentioned components of NAD+ regulated aging signaling pathway at one place. This will be useful in understanding how evolutionary forces have made these genetic components fit in to the bigger picture of aging.
Materials and methods
Sequence data collection
To begin with, a set of 10 genes which are documented to play important roles in NAD+/Sirtuin signaling pathway is created, which is as follows: PARP1(Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase), PARP2, SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT6, MRPS5 (mitochondrial ribosomal protein 5), FOXO3a, TP53, PPARGC1A (peroxisome proliferator activated receptor PPARy co-activator 1α), and SOD3 (Super Oxide Dismutase 3). The CDS sequences were retrieved by extensive searches of NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) databases and Ensembl genome browser (http://www.ensembl.org/index.html).
In order to test whether the evolutionary trend in the phylogeny was affected by taxonomic sampling used, we sorted the taxonomic samplings into 5 data sets including a total of 51 species, which are model organisms, mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fishes. The following species were used for analysis: model organisms- Drosophila melanogaster (Fruitfly), Caenorhabditis elegans (Worm), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Yeast), Mus musculus (Mouse), Danio rerio (Zebra fish); Mammals (15 species)- Homo sapiens (Human), Macaca mulatta (Macaque), Pongo abelii (Orangutan), Heterocephalus glaber (Naked mole rat), Oryctolagus cuniculus (Rabbit), Ailuropoda melanoleuca (Panda), Canis familiaris (Dog), Equus caballus (Horse), Bos taurus (Cow), Sus scrofa (Pig), Tursiops truncatus (Dolphin), Loxodonta africana (Elephant), Dasypus novemcinctus (Armadillo), Monodelphis domestica (Opossum) and Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Platypus); Birds (10 species)- Gallus gallus (Chicken), Meleagris gallopavo (Turkey), Anas platyrhynchos (Duck), Taeniopygia guttata (Zebra finch), Columba livia (Rock pigeon), Ficedula albicollis (Flycatcher), Parus major (Great tit), Struthio camelus (African ostrich), Pygoscelis adeliae (Adelie penguin), Sturnus vulgaris (Common starling); Reptiles (10 species)- Anolis carolinensis (Anole Lizard), Pogona vitticeps (Central bearded dragon), Gekko japonicas (Gecko), Protobothrops mucrosquamatus (Taiwan habu), Chrysemys picta bellii (Western painted turtle), Pelodiscus sinensis (Chinese softshell turtle), Chelonia mydas (Green sea turtle) Alligator mississippiensis (American alligator), Alligator sinensis (Chinese alligator), Gavialis gangeticus (Gharial); Amphibians (3 species)- Xenopus tropicalis (Tropical clawed frog), Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog), Nanorana parkeri (Tibetan frog); Fishes (8 species)- Gadus morhua (Cod), Oreochromis niloticus (Tilapia), Oryzias latipes (Medaka), Takifugu rubripes (Fugu), Tetraodon nigroviridis (Tetraodon), Xiphophorus maculatus (Southern platyfish), Lepisosteus oculatus (Spotted gar), Poecilia reticulate (guppy).
Sequence alignment and editing
The phylogenetic analysis was carried out to infer the relationship among homologous genes, by creating the multiple sequence alignment for CDS sequence of each gene in different species using ClustalX tool of BioEdit (ver. 7.2.5) [36] with appropriate manual adjustments. Some genes did not have homologues in all species, so the CDS sequences were retrieved for all the possible species in which the homologues were available. The species topology was generated by the TimeTree web server (http://www.timetree.org/).
Selection pressure analyses
The selective pressures acting on the NAD+/Sirtuin pathway coding genes were calculated by CODEML program in PAML package version 4.7, using a phylogenetic-based Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis [37]. The ML estimates of the branch lengths and the ratio of the nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous substitution rates (dS), ω = dN/dS, were obtained using the codeml program. The ω parameter was used as a measure of the protein selective constraints [38]. These analyses were conducted under different competing evolutionary hypothesis. Alignment was visualized with GeneDoc software [39].
Branch-site models were used to detect positive selection sites among different species lineages. The branch #1 is mammal branch, #2-#5 are leading to birds (#2), birds and reptiles (#3), amphibians (#4) and fishes (#5) were marked as the foreground lineage to analyze whether positive selection occurred along these branches. Only foreground lineages may have experienced positive selection. The model assumes four classes of sites. Site class 0 includes codons that are conserved throughout the tree, with 0 < ω0 < 1 estimated. Site class 1 includes codons that are evolving neutrally throughout the tree with ω1 = 1. Site classes 2a and 2b include codons that are conserved or neutral on the background branches, but came under positive selection on the foreground branches with ω2 > 1, estimated from the data. Likelihood ratio tests were carried out to compare branch site null model and branch site model. The bayes empirical bayes (BEB) approach was used to calculate the posterior probabilities that each site belongs to the site class of positive selection on the foreground lineages with a significance threshold of p>95%. Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing [40].
Protein structural analysis
The protein structural analysis for two genes PARP1 and PARP2 was further carried out, since PARPs are important candidate genes in NAD+/Sirtuin pathway. We predicted the folding pattern using SWISS-MODEL web server (http://swissmodel.expasy.org) [41]. Positive selection sites identified in the branch-site model were marked within the three dimensional structure map of PARP1 and PARP2. Electrostatic potential were calculated using the PBEQ-Solver web server (http://www.charmm-gui.org/?doc=input/pbeqsolver). All figures were displayed and generated with PyMOL software (DeLano Scientific; http://pymol.org).
Results
Gene homologues present in different clades and species topology
The gene homologues for ten NAD+/Sirtuin pathway genes were searched against NCBI and Ensembl databases in different species (Table 1). Sequences and accession numbers of 10 genes in different species were shown in S1 and S2 Tables. Gene PARP2 was completely absent in birds. The species topology for all the 51 species was constructed and shown in Fig 1.
Table 1. Gene homologues information for 10 genes in different species.
Taxon | Species | PARP1 | PARP2 | SIRT1 | SIRT2 | SIRT6 | MRPS5 | FOXO3a | TP53 | PPARGC1A | SOD3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model species | Fruitfly | Drosophila melanogaster | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Worm | Caenorhabditis elegans | √ | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | × | × | √ | |
Yeast | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | × | × | × | √ | × | √ | × | × | × | × | |
Mouse | Mus musculus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Zebrafish | Danio rerio | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Mammal | Human | Homo sapiens | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Macaque | Macaca mulatta | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Orangutan | Pongo abelii | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Naked mole rat | Heterocephalus glaber | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Rabbit | Oryctolagus cuniculus | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Panda | Ailuropoda melanoleuca | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Dog | Canis lupus familiaris | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Horse | Equus caballus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Cow | Bos taurus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Pig | Sus scrofa | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Dolphin | Tursiops truncatus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Elephant | Loxodonta africana | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Armadillo | Dasypus novemcinctus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Opossum | Monodelphis domestica | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Platypus | Ornithorhynchus anatinus | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Aves | Chicken | Gallus gallus | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Turkey | Meleagris gallopavo | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Duck | Anas platyrhynchos | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Zebra finch | Taeniopygia guttata | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Rock pigeon | Columba livia | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Flycatcher | Ficedula albicollis | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Great tit | Parus major | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
African ostrich | Struthio camelus | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Adelie penguin | Pygoscelis adeliae | √ | × | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Common starling | Sturnus vulgaris | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Reptile | Anole lizard | Anolis carolinensis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Central bearded dragon | Pogona vitticeps | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Gecko | Gekko japonicus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Taiwan habu | Protobothrops mucrosquamatus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Western painted turtle | Chrysemys picta bellii | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Chinese softshell turtle | Pelodiscus sinensis | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Green sea turtle | Chelonia mydas | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
American alligator | Alligator mississippiensis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Chinese alligator | Alligator sinensis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Gharial | Gavialis gangeticus | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Amphibian | Tropical clawed frog | Xenopus tropicalis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
African clawed frog | Xenopus laevis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | × | |
Tibetan frog | Nanorana parkeri | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | |
Fish | Cod | Gadus morhua | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | × |
Tilapia | Oreochromis niloticus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Medaka | Oryzias latipes | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Fugu | Takifugu rubripes | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Tetraodon | Tetraodon nigroviridis | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Southern platyfish | Xiphophorus maculatus | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Spotted gar | Lepisosteus oculatus | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
Guppy | Poecilia reticulata | √ | √ | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Selection pressure analysis for NAD+/Sirtuin pathway genes
Selection pressure on each branch was calculated using branch-site model in PAML package (S3 Table). The posterior probabilities of each site belonging to the site class of the positive selection on the foreground lineages were calculated using BEB approach. The sites under positive selection for each gene are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Positively selected sites under branch-site model for foreground lineages Prob(w>1).
Gene | Lineages | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mammals | Birds | Birds/Reptiles | Amphibian | Fish | |
MRPS5 | - | - | - | - | - |
FOXO3a | - | - | - | 435 F 0.983* | 442 S 0.983* |
436 G 0.987* | 591 S 0.956* | ||||
437 P 0.979* | |||||
463 S 0.984* | |||||
655 N 0.982* | |||||
PARP1 | - | - | - | 146 P 0.991** | 72 D 0.966* |
563 V 0.967* | 269 K 0.995** | ||||
1011 T 0.987* | 293 L 0.978* | ||||
1012 S 0.997** | 392 N 0.970* | ||||
606 S 0.965* | |||||
807 D 0.965* | |||||
830 D 0.996** | |||||
PARP2 | - | - | -(Reptiles) | 69 S 0.967* | 241 M 0.963* |
319 Q 0.977* | |||||
PPARGC1A | - | - | - | - | - |
SIRT1 | - | - | - | - | - |
SIRT2 | - | - | 216 E 0.997** | - | 162 L 0.994** |
246 C 0.976* | 249 S 0.958* | ||||
253 K 0.960* | |||||
SOD3 | - | - | - | - | 197 E 0.979* |
TP53 | - | - | - | - | 101 K 0.969* |
SIRT6 | - | - | - | - | - |
Lineages corresponded to branches depicted in Fig 1; “-” indicates no positively selected sites were detected in that branch;
*: P < 0.05;
**: P < 0.001.
Numbers of positively selected sites were amino acid residues at the position of each gene in Human.
The likelihood ratio tests of positive selection based on ML method of [33], was applied. The values of likelihood ratio tests of positive selection operating on the genes in present study have been provided as S4 Table. The Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was applied following LRT tests. The correction p value used 0.001 as the significance level (S4 Table). PARP2 gene is missing in birds that’s why the lineage has been defined exclusively for reptiles in the Table 2 for the birds/reptile lineage.
Protein structural analysis
The functional protein of PARP1 consists of five conserved domain: one PAPR-like domain, one WGR PARP1-like domain, two zf-PARP domains, one PADR1 domain and one BRCT1 domain (Fig 2). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (parp)-like catalytic domain catalyzes the covalent attachment of ADP-ribose units from NAD+ to itself and to a limited number of other DNA binding proteins, which decreases their affinity for DNA. For gene PARP1, Two sites (P146 and V563) were found under positive selection in Amphibian. Seven positively selected sites were found in fish branch. Six potentially functional sites (D72, L293, N392, S606, D807 and D830) were found to be present in five conserved domains in fishes (Fig 2).
PARP2 gene has two functional domains which are WGR-PARP2-like domain and PARP-like catalytic domain (Fig 3). For the gene PARP2, two sites (M241 and Q319) in PARP-like catalytic domain were found to be positively selected in fishes (Fig 3).
PARP genes, which have been predicted to have the most sites under positive selection in the present study, were further used to infer structural changes in the 3D structure of the protein. For gene PARP1, 11 positively selected sites, which are D72, P146, K269, L293, N392, V563, S606, D807, D830, T1011, S1012 were present in different lineages, with fishes having the most sites under positive selection (Table 2, Fig 4A). Some of the positively selected sites caused a change in electrostatic potential of the protein structure in mammals, birds, reptiles and fishes (Fig 4B).
For the gene PARP2, three positively selected sites which are S69, M241, Q319 are seen and two positively selected sites M241 and Q319 in fishes caused a change in the electrostatic potential when mapped on to the 3D protein structure of PARP2 in fishes (Fig 5).
Discussion
The present study analyzed the molecular evolution of ten genes involved in NAD+/Sirtuin pathway in 51 species that represented all of the major animal eukaryotic taxa. Most of the components of NAD+/Sirtuin pathway were present in all the taxa except PARP2, which was absent from birds. SIRT2 and TP53 were also under-represented in this clade. This is particularly noteworthy since birds represent an independent evolutionary origin [11]. In this present study, the branch leading to the mammals, birds, birds and reptiles, amphibians and fishes were designed as the foreground branches in branch-site models to examine positive selection. We found that PARP1 and PARP2 had the most sites under positive selection. These positively selected sites in PARP1 and PARP2 are worthy of further investigation.
NAD+/Sirtuin pathway lies at the intersection of important aging pathways, such as FOXO and mitochondrial UPR, which makes it difficult to understand its independent role [12]. However, a couple of reports have clearly established NAD+/Sirtuin pathway as an important aging regulator [20,42,43,44]. It is very important to understand a genetic mechanism from evolutionary point of view, to gain a clear picture of the natural selection acting on each component of the involved pathways. There have been an exhaustive molecular evolutionary analysis of IIS/TOR aging network which uncovered substantial variation in IIS/TOR network within and among amniotes and provided a critical step to unlock information on vertebrate patterns of genetic regulation of metabolism, modes of reproduction and rates of aging [11]. Also, the evolutionary relationships of sirtuins have been searched for all seven sirtuins present in 77 representative species of animals, plants, bacteria and archaea [45]. Molecular evolutionary patterns of Insulin/FOXO signaling pathway have also been explored in metazoan genomes. It has been found that most of the enzymes associated with vertebrate NAD metabolism are subjected to different levels of purifying selection [14]. No significant evidence of positive selection was found for MRPS5, PPARGC1A, SIRT1 and SIRT6 in any of the clades, indicating significant constraints on these genes, which was probably because of the basic requirement for their function in all clades. In contrast, a series of positively selected sites in PARPs, pointed out the regulatory role of DNA repair mechanisms. FOXO3a displayed no positive selection among mammals, birds and reptiles, yet multiple positively selected sites were present in amphibians and fishes, which is consistent with the previous reports where most members of FOXO gene family are found to be under strong purifying selection [46].
All three sirtuins (SIRT1, SIRT2 and SIRT6), displayed great degree of conservation between taxa, which is consistent with a previous comprehensive evolutionary analysis [45]. A significant evolutionary constraint is seen on the anti-oxidant gene, SOD3, which is a member of the superoxide dismutase protein family. SODs are antioxidant enzymes that catalyze the dismutation of two superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen. The product of this gene is thought to protect the brain, lungs, and other tissues from oxidative stress. A previous report has also revealed great deal of evolutionary conservation among the members of SOD gene family [47], which is pertinent to the functional significance of this gene family. TP53, which is a transcription factor involved in maintaining genomic integrity by regulating genes involved in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and programmed cell death, has got a celebrity status in mammals, owing to its function in promoting adaptive responses to stress [48]. The branches representing bird, reptile and amphibian, and mammals did not display any sign of positive selection, whereas one site was positively selected in fishes. The reason for the greater conservation of this gene could be its importance in maintaining the cell cycle, DNA repair and cell death.
What attracted our particular attention was the PARPs gene family, which has already been suggested to be evolving under strong recurrent selection pressure [49] and displayed multiple positively selected amino acid sites in the functional protein domains in the present study. PARPs are the NAD+ consuming poly ADP-ribose polymerase proteins which exerts a direct powerful metabolic impact by altering the NAD+ levels, since it competes with sirtuins proteins which also uses NAD+ as a mandatory substrate for deacetylase activity [12]. PARP1 is the most abundant of all the parp’s and contributes to neuronal survival and death under different stress conditions [50]. Ex-vivo supplementation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with NAD+ precursor nicotinic acid resulted in enhanced levels of cellular NAD+ levels which boosted the cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation response to genotoxic treatment, and protected from DNA-damage-induced cell death [51]. Inhibition of PARP has resulted in protection against mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in Parkinson fruit fly model [52]. Recent reports suggest that PARP1 and PARP2 stand at the crossroad of metabolic stress and inflammation and play important role in longevity and aging [31,32,43,53,54].
In present study, the branch leading to fish displayed greater adaptive evolutionary pressure acting on PARP1, since this had the most sites under positive selection (Table 2). In contrast, PARP1 seems to be more conserved in bird, reptile, amphibian, and mammalian branches. As the basic function of PARP1 is the maintenance of nucleolus structure and function, it comes as no surprise that this gene has been under greater constraints during evolution [55]. The positively selected sites in PARP1 caused a change in the electrostatic potential of the protein (Fig 4).
Interestingly, PARP2 gene also displayed the similar evolutionary trend where the branch leading to fishes had two positively selected sites which is further supported by the fact that the evolution of fish proteins is faster than mammalian orthologs [56]. Furthermore, a change in electrostatic potential in 3D protein structure for PARP2 protein was found for positively selected sites M241 and Q319. Whether these amino acid changes had some adaptive advantage need further experimental evidences. The change in electrostatic potential of PARP1 and PARP2 may allow a change in their interaction with other proteins and molecules, which might ultimately lead to difference in the function.
Looking at the importance of PARP1 and PARP2 genes in hematopoiesis, embryonic development, spermatogenesis, T-cell maturation and adipogenesis in mammals, it becomes evident that evolutionary forces have maintained the greater constraints on these genes for all the good reasons [57,58].
Conclusion
This is the first comprehensive analysis of the molecular evolution of 10 NAD+/Sirtuin pathway related genes in mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fishes. All of these genes have been under strong constraints in mammals. FOXO3a, PARP1, PARP2, SIRT2, TP53, and SOD3 genes had been under stronger evolutionary pressures in fishes. However, birds and reptiles have not been under much evolutionary selection forces for these genes, owing to their own independent evolutionary origin. PARP1 and PARP2 had the most sites under positive selection. Looking at the 3D structure of these proteins in different taxa, a clear change in electrostatic potential is observed which could be one of the ways by which the protein interaction with other proteins and molecules might have evolved. The current evolutionary analysis poses PARPs as an important component of the NAD+/Sirtuin pathway, which should be explored further experimentally.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by “Special postdoc grant” from Sichuan, The National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471998) and Sichuan “Thousand Talents Program.”
References
- 1.Mount DM. Bioinformatics: Sequence and Genome Analysis. Second Edition By Mount David W. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Von Dassow G, Munro E. Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo. J. Exp. Zool. 1999; 285(4): 307–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang M, Zhang X, Zhao H, Wang Q, Pan Y. FoxO gene family evolution in vertebrates. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009; 9(1):1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jobson RW, Dehne-Garcia A, Galtier N. Apparent longevity-related adaptation of mitochondrial amino acid content is due to nucleotide compositional shifts. Mitochondrion. 2010; 10 (5):540–547. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2010.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Webb AE, Kundaje A, Brunet A. Characterization of the direct targets of FOXO transcription factors throughout evolution. Aging Cell. 2016; 15 (4):673–685. doi: 10.1111/acel.12479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vassilopoulos A, Fritz KS, Petersen DR, Gius D. The human sirtuin family: Evolutionary divergences and functions. Human Genomics. 2011; 5 (5):485–496. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-5-5-485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Houtkooper RH, Mouchiroud L, Ryu D, Moullan N, Katsyuba E, Knott G, et al. Mitonuclear protein imbalance as a conserved longevity mechanism. Nature. 2013; 497 (7450):451–457. doi: 10.1038/nature12188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Willcox BJ, Donlon TA, He Q, Chen R, Grove JS, Yano K, et al. FOXO3A genotype is strongly associated with human longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008; 105 (37):13987–13992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801030105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Flachsbart F, Caliebe A, Kleindorp R, Blanché H, Von EH, Nikolaus S, et al. Association of FOXO3A variation with human longevity confirmed in German centenarians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106 (8):2700–2705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pawlikowska L, Hu D, Huntsman S, Sung A, Chu C, Chen J, et al. Association of common genetic variation in the insulin/IGF1 signaling pathway with human longevity. Aging Cell. 2009; 8 (4):460–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00493.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mcgaugh SE, Bronikowski AM, Kuo CH, Reding DM, Addis EA, Flagel LE, et al. Rapid molecular evolution across amniotes of the IIS/TOR network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015; 112 (22):7055–7060. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419659112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mouchiroud L, Houtkooper RH, Moullan N, Katsyuba E, Ryu D, Cantó C, et al. The NAD+/sirtuin pathway modulates longevity through activation of mitochondrial UPR and FOXO signaling. Cell. 2013; 154 (2):430–441. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gossmann T, Ziegler M, Puntervoll P, Figueiredo L, Schuster S, Heiland I. NAD+ biosynthesis and salvage—a phylogenetic perspective. FEBS Journal. (2012); 279 (18):3355–3363. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08559.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gossmanna T, Ziegler M (2014) Sequence divergence and diversity suggests ongoing functional diversification of vertebrate NAD metabolism. DNA Repair. 2014; 23:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin S. J., Ford E., Haigis M., Liszt G., & Guarente L. Calorie restriction extends yeast life span by lowering the level of NADH. Genes & Development. 2004; 18(1): 12–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Imai S. Dissecting systemic control of metabolism and aging in the NAD World: The importance of SIRT1 and NAMPT-mediated NAD biosynthesis. FEBS Letters. 2011; 585(11):1657–62. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.04.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Imai S, Yoshino J. The importance of NAMPT/NAD/SIRT1 in the systemic regulation of metabolism and ageing. Diabetes Obesity & Metabolism. 2013; 15 Suppl 3(s3):26–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Imai S, Guarente L. NAD+ and sirtuins in aging and disease. Trends in Cell Biology 2014; 24(8):464–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Herskovits AZ, Guarente L. Sirtuin deacetylases in neurodegenerative diseases of aging. Cell Research 2013; 23 (6):746–758. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scheibyeknudsen M, Mitchell SJ, Fang EF, Iyama T, Ward T, Wang J, et al. A High Fat Diet and NAD+ Rescue Premature Aging in Cockayne Syndrome. Cell Metabolism. 2014; 20 (5):840–855. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guarente L. Mitochondria—a nexus for aging, calorie restriction, and sirtuins? Cell. 2008; 132 (132):171–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haigis MC, Sinclair DA. Mammalian Sirtuins: Biological Insights and Disease Relevance. Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease. 2010; 5 (5):253–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Houtkooper RH, Cantó C, Wanders RJ, Auwerx J. The secret life of NAD+: an old metabolite controlling new metabolic signaling pathways. Endocrine Reviews. 2010; 31 (2):194–223. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chalkiadaki A, Guarente L. Sirtuins mediate mammalian metabolic responses to nutrient availability. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2012; 8 (5):287–296. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yoshino J, Mills KF, Yoon MJ, Imai S. Nicotinamide mononucleotide, a key NAD+ intermediate, treats the pathophysiology of diet- and age-induced diabetes in mice. Cell Metabolism. 2011; 14 (4):528–536. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cantó C, Houtkooper RH, Pirinen E, Dou YY, Oosterveer MH, Cen Y, et al. The NAD+ precursor nicotinamide riboside enhances oxidative metabolism and protects against high-fat diet induced obesity. Cell Metabolism. 2012; 15 (6):838–847. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Perina D, Mikoč A, Ahel J, Ćetković H, Žaja R, Ahel I. Distribution of protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation systems across all domains of life. DNA Repair. 2014; 23: 4–16. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gibson BA, Kraus WL. New insights into the molecular and cellular functions of poly(ADP-ribose) and PARPs. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2012; 13 (7):411–424. doi: 10.1038/nrm3376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schreiber V, Dantzer F, Ame JC, De MG. Poly(ADP-ribose): novel functions for an old molecule. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2006; 7 (7):517–528. doi: 10.1038/nrm1963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Asher G, Reinke H, Altmeyer M, Gutierrez-Arcelus M, Hottiger MO, Schibler U. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 participates in the phase entrainment of circadian clocks to feeding. Cell. 2010; 142 (6):943–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bai P, Canto C, Brunyánszki A, Huber A, Szántó M, Cen Y, et al. PARP-2 regulates SIRT1 expression and whole body energy expenditure. Cell Metabolism. 2011; 13 (4):450–460. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bai P, Canto C, Oudart H, Brunyánszki A, Cen Y, Thomas C, et al. PARP-1 inhibition increases mitochondrial metabolism through SIRT1 activation. Cell Metabolism. 2011; 13 (4):461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Erener S, Mirsaidi A, Hesse M, Tiaden AN, Ellingsgaard H, Kostadinova R, et al. ARTD1 deletion causes increased hepatic lipid accumulation in mice fed a high-fat diet and impairs adipocyte function and differentiation. FASEB J. 2012; 26(6):2631–8 doi: 10.1096/fj.11-200212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grube K, Bürkle A. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity in mononuclear leukocytes of 13 mammalian species correlates with species-specific life span. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1992; 89 (89):11759–11763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mangerich A, Herbach N, Hanf B, Fischbach A, Popp O, Moreno-Villanueva M, et al. Inflammatory and age-related pathologies in mice with ectopic expression of human PARP-1. Mechanisms of Ageing & Development. 2010; 131 (6):389–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chenna BR, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Addictive Behaviors. 2010; 32 (5):1043–1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang HC, Susko E, Roger AJ. PROCOV: maximum likelihood estimation of protein phylogeny under covarion models and site-specific covarion pattern analysis. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2009; 9 (1):3246–3260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007; 24 (8):1586–1591. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nicholas KB, Nicholas HB, Deerfield DW. GeneDoc: analysis and visualization of genetic variation. EMBNET News 1997; 4 14 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Miller RGJ. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42 (W1): W252–W258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fang EF, Kassahun H, Croteau DL, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Marosi K, Lu H, et al. NAD(+) Replenishment Improves Lifespan and Healthspan in Ataxia Telangiectasia Models via Mitophagy and DNA Repair. Cell Metabolism. 2016; 24 (4):566–581. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Merksamer PI, Liu Y, He W, Hirschey MD, Chen D, Verdin E. The sirtuins, oxidative stress and aging: an emerging link. Aging. 2013; 5 (3):144–150. doi: 10.18632/aging.100544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mangerich A, Bürkle A. Pleiotropic Cellular Functions of PARP1 in Longevity and Aging: Genome Maintenance Meets Inflammation. Oxidative Medicine & Cellular Longevity. 2012; (6):321653–321653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Greiss S, Gartner A. Sirtuin/Sir2 Phylogeny, Evolutionary Considerations and Structural Conservation. Molecules and Cells. 2009; 28 (5):407–415. doi: 10.1007/s10059-009-0169-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fetterman CD, Rannala B, Walter MA. Identification and analysis of evolutionary selection pressures acting at the molecular level in five forkhead subfamilies. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2008; 8 (1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zelko IN, Mariani TJ, Folz RJ. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures, evolution, and expression. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 2002; 33 (3):337–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lu WJ, Amatruda JF, Abrams JM. p53 ancestry: gazing through an evolutionary lens. Nature Reviews Cancer.2009; 9 (10):758–762. doi: 10.1038/nrc2732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Daugherty MD, Young JM, Kerns JA, Malik HS. Rapid Evolution of PARP Genes Suggests a Broad Role for ADP-Ribosylation in Host-Virus Conflicts. Plos Genetics. 2014; 10(5):e1004403 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kauppinen TM, Swanson RA. The role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in CNS disease. Neuroscience. 2007; 145 (4):1267–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weidele K, Kunzmann A, Schmitz M, Beneke S, Bürkle A. Ex vivo supplementation with nicotinic acid enhances cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and improves cell viability in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2010; 80 (7):1103–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lehmann S, Costa AC, Celardo I, Loh SH, Martins LM. Parp mutations protect against mitochondrial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in a PARKIN model of Parkinson's disease. Cell Death & Disease. 2016; 7 (3):e2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Altmeyer M, Hottiger MO. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 at the crossroad of metabolic stress and inflammation in aging. Aging. 2009; 1 (5):458–469. doi: 10.18632/aging.100052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Szántó M, Rutkai I, Hegedus C, Czikora Á, Rózsahegyi M, Kiss B, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 depletion reduces doxorubicin-induced damage through SIRT1 induction. Cardiovascular Research. 2011; 92 (3):430–438. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Boamah EK, Kotova E, Garabedian M, Jarnik M, Tulin AV. Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) regulates ribosomal biogenesis in Drosophila nucleoli. Plos Genetics. 2012; 8 (1): e1002442 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Brunet FG, Roest CH, Paris M, Aury JM, Gibert P, Jaillon O, et al. Gene loss and evolutionary rates following whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes. Molecular Biology and Evolution.2006; 23 (9):1808–1816. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Farrés J, Martín-Caballero J, Martínez C, Lozano JJ, Llacuna L, Ampurdanés C, et al. Parp-2 is required to maintain hematopoiesis following sublethal γ-irradiation in mice. Blood. 2013; 122 (1):44–54. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-472845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Boehler C, Gauthier L, Yelamos J, Noll A, Schreiber V, Dantzer F. Phenotypic Characterization of Parp-1 and Parp-2 Deficient Mice and Cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 780:313–36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-270-0_19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.