Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common treatment-related adverse effect which is detrimental to the quality of life of cancer patients. It could even lead to dose reductions or discontinuations of chemotherapy. There has been a randomized trial involving breast cancer patients, that showed that the incidence of chemotherapy—induced emesis was almost as high as 80% when no effective antiemetic agents were prescribed [1]. Since then, the development of new antiemetics has changed the situation. An observational study reported that incidences of acute nausea and vomiting decreased to 35% and 13% respectively, among patients who received highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy [2]. As a result, the quality of life of cancer patients has improved, and better control of CINV has led to less dose reductions and discontinuations of chemotherapy.
CINV is classified into acute and delayed types, depending on the timing it occurs [3,4]. Acute types occur within the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, and delayed types occur after that.
Advances in the past 3 decades have helped disclose some of the mechanisms of CINV. Several neurotransmitters, including dopamine, serotonin, and substance P, have been identified as important mediators of CINV [5]. Accumulated knowledge suggests that the emetic response to chemotherapy can occur through a peripheral and a central pathway [6]. The peripheral pathway, which is activated within 24 hours after chemotherapy, is associated with acute CINV. Anticancer agents induce enterochromaffin cells in the gut to release serotonin, which activates the 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor in vagal afferents that then proceed to stimulate the vomiting center in the brainstem. Meanwhile, the central pathway is primarily located in the brain. In this case, substance P is a principal neurotransmitter which activates neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptors in the central nervous system. This pathway is mainly activated after the first 24 hours of finishing chemotherapy and is often involved in the delayed CINV, although it could also induce acute CINV at times. These revelations have led to the development of drugs such as dopamine, 5-HT3, and NK1 receptor antagonists.
Several agents such as cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin can induce both acute and delayed CINV [7]. A 4-level classification of the emetogenic potential of anticancer drugs has been established. This is based on the percentage of patients with acute emesis caused by single agents in the absence of antiemetic drugs, from level 1 (minimal); less than 10%, to level 4 (high); more than 90% of patients with emesis [8].
The guidelines for antiemetic therapy have been developed in various cancer societies. The common principles are that prophylaxis should be the primary goal, and that it should be applied to patients who have a 10% or higher risk of CINV. All guidelines recommend the use of 5-HT3 and NK1 receptor antagonists as well as corticosteroids for patients undergoing treatment with highly emetogenic anticancer drugs [9,10]. The administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists typically reduces or prevents emesis in 50% of patients. This percentage increases in combination with dexamethasone, and it increases further, when an NK1-receptor antagonist is added [11]. However, these effects of the antiemetic combinations are still insufficient, since the ultimate goal is to prevent CINV all together. In addition, food intake decreases to 25% of baseline, by a week after the administration of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy [12].
Japan's traditional herbal medicine, called Kampo, was originally imported from China 1,500 years ago, and has since developed independently [13]. Kampo medicines have been integrated into the National Healthcare System and are currently prescribed by more than 80% of medical doctors in Japan [14]. In recent years, the pharmacological mechanisms of several Kampo medicines have been investigated using animal models. Clinical trials have also been conducted to assess the effects.
One of the Kampo medicines that is known to have an antiemetic effect is Rikkunshito. Rikkunshito is composed of 8 herbal medicines and is widely used to treat various gastrointestinal disorders in Japan [15]. Through animal experiments, it has been demonstrated that Rikkunshito antagonizes the 5-HT3 receptor [16]. Furthermore, it also antagonizes 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2B (5-HT2B) and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C (5-HT2C) receptors, preventing the cisplatin-induced decrease in ghrelin levels, which results in the recovery of food intake [17]. Since Rikkunshito is not composed of a single substance, as with other Kampo medicines, it is difficult to determine the active component responsible for the beneficial effect and reveal the underlying mechanism of it. Pharmacological studies are under way to pursue this [18]. The effect of Rikkunshito for CINV has only been investigated in 2 prospective studies with small sample sizes [19,20], so far. In this issue, Ohnishi et al. [21] reported the result of randomized multi-institutional studies, which revealed the additive effect of Rikkunshito to prevent CINV induced by cisplatin and paclitaxel in uterine cervical or corpus cancer patients. I have to say that the sample size was rather small and the study was not conducted in a blind manner. Although it is difficult to set appropriate and subjective endpoints in Kampo medicine, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials similar to those of Western medicine might provide clearer evidence.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
- 1.Morran C, Smith DC, Anderson DA, McArdle CS. Incidence of nausea and vomiting with cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective randomised trial of antiemetics. BMJ. 1979;1:1323–1324. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6174.1323-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Geling O, Hansen M, Cruciani G, et al. Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer. 2004;100:2261–2268. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM, Beck T, Hainsworth JD, Harker G, et al. Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:103–109. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Burish TG, Rosenthal SN. Frequency and clinical implications of delayed nausea and delayed emesis. Am J Clin Oncol. 1996;19:199–203. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199604000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2482–2494. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Navari RM, Aapro M. Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1356–1367. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1515442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (US) NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology. Antiemesis, version 2. 2017 [Internet] Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; c2017. [cited 2017 May 26]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/antiemesis.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roila F, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J, Antiemetic Subcommitte of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus Conference. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:20–28. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hesketh PJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH, Basch E, Chesney M, Clark-Snow RA, et al. Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:381–386. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.3635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (CA) MASCC antiemetic guidelines [Internet] Toronto: Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer; 2016. [cited 2017 May 15]. Available from: http://www.mascc.org/antiemetic-guidelines. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jordan K, Jahn F, Aapro M. Recent developments in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a comprehensive review. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1081–1090. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hiura Y, Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Takahashi T, Kurokawa Y, Yamasaki M, et al. Effects of ghrelin administration during chemotherapy with advanced esophageal cancer patients: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study. Cancer. 2012;118:4785–4794. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fuyuno I. Japan: will the sun set on Kampo? Nature. 2011;480:S96. doi: 10.1038/480S96a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ohnishi S, Takeda H. Herbal medicines for the treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced side effects. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:14. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tatsuta M, Iishi H. Effect of treatment with liu-jun-zi-tang (TJ-43) on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal symptoms in dyspeptic patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993;7:459–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1993.tb00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tominaga K, Kido T, Ochi M, Sadakane C, Mase A, Okazaki H, et al. The traditional Japanese medicine rikkunshito promotes gastric emptying via the antagonistic action of the 5-HT(3) receptor pathway in rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:248481. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takeda H, Sadakane C, Hattori T, Katsurada T, Ohkawara T, Nagai K, et al. Rikkunshito, an herbal medicine, suppresses cisplatin-induced anorexia in rats via 5-HT2 receptor antagonism. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:2004–2013. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fujitsuka N, Uezono Y. Rikkunshito, a ghrelin potentiator, ameliorates anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:271. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ohno T, Yanai M, Ando H, Toyomasu Y, Ogawa A, Morita H, et al. Rikkunshito, a traditional Japanese medicine, suppresses cisplatin-induced anorexia in humans. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2011;4:291–296. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S26297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seike J, Sawada T, Kawakita N, Yamamoto Y, Yuasa Y, Yamai H, et al. A new candidate supporting drug, rikkunshito, for the QOL in advanced esophageal cancer patients with chemotherapy using docetaxel/5-FU/CDDP. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:715623. doi: 10.1155/2011/715623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ohnishi S, Watari H, Kanno M, Ohba Y, Takeuchi S, Miyaji T, et al. Additive effect of rikkunshito, an herbal medicine, on chemotherapy-induced nausea, vomiting, and anorexia in uterine cervical or corpus cancer patients treated with cisplatin and paclitaxel: results of a randomized phase II study (JORTC KMP-02) J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e44. Forthcoming. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]