Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;318(1):68–81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7918

Table 2. Pain Intensity Score (Primary Outcome)a,b Among Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Overall Effect Intervention Group, Mean (95% CI) Control Group, Mean (95% CI) Between-Group Difference, Mean (95% CI)c P Value
Facet joint trial, No. of participants 125 126
Overall −0.08 (−0.50 to 0.34) .71
3 wk 5.17 (4.73 to 5.61) 5.92 (5.58 to 6.26) −0.41 (−1.02 to 0.19) .18
6 wk 5.19 (4.76 to 5.61) 5.90 (5.53 to 6.26) −0.38 (−0.96 to 0.20) .20
3 mo 5.01 (4.59 to 5.43) 5.44 (5.03 to 5.85) −0.18 (−0.76 to 0.40) .55
6 mo 4.61 (4.18 to 5.04) 4.84 (4.38 to 5.30) −0.04 (−0.63 to 0.56) .91
9 mo 4.66 (4.20 to 5.00) 4.73 (4.24 to 5.22) 0.19 (−0.41 to 0.80) .53
12 mo 4.49 (4.00 to 4.97) 4.44 (3.94 to 4.94) 0.47 (−0.14 to 1.07) .13
Sacroiliac joint trial, No. of participants 116 112
Overall −0.40 (−0.83 to 0.03) .07
3 wk 4.96 (4.51 to 5.40) 6.00 (5.59 to 6.41) −0.96 (−1.63 to −0.29) .005
6 wk 5.22 (4.81 to 5.64) 5.69 (5.31 to 6.08) −0.53 (−1.17 to 0.10) .10
3 mo 4.77 (4.31 to 5.24) 5.45 (4.94 to 5.95) −0.71 (−1.35 to −0.06) .03
6 mo 4.50 (4.01 to 4.98) 4.78 (4.24 to 5.31) −0.12 (−0.77 to 0.53) .73
9 mo 5.03 (4.55 to 5.51) 4.97 (4.39 to 5.56) 0.16 (−0.51 to 0.83) .64
12 mo 4.65 (4.16 to 5.13) 4.84 (4.30 to 5.38) −0.07 (−0.74 to 0.60) .83
Combination trial, No. of participants 103 99
Overall −0.21 (−0.76 to 0.35) .47
3 wk 5.45 (4.95 to 5.95) 6.40 (5.91 to 6.89) −0.65 (−1.47 to 0.17) .12
6 wk 5.37 (4.89 to 5.85) 6.09 (5.65 to 6.52) −0.40 (−1.14 to 0.34) .29
3 mo 4.77 (4.25 to 5.30) 5.94 (5.42 to 6.45) −0.99 (−1.73 to −0.25) .01
6 mo 4.92 (4.39 to 5.44) 4.95 (4.35 to 5.54) 0.33 (−0.53 to 1.09) .39
9 mo 5.01 (4.47 to 5.56) 5.25 (4.65 to 5.86) −0.05 (−0.82 to 0.73) .90
12 mo 4.85 (4.24 to 5.46) 4.38 (3.73 to 5.03) 0.69 (−0.10 to 1.49) .09

Abbreviation: NNT, number needed to treat.

a

Measured by numeric rating scale (score range, 0-10); a higher score indicates more severe symptoms.

b

The overall effect measures provide information over the total follow-up time of 12 mo, instead of the time × treatment effects.

c

Values presented (for mean differences) are model estimates of linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept, and adjusted for outcome at baseline and age, sex, body mass index, education, smoking, marital status, back pain complaint history, and participant expectations. Regression coefficients can be interpreted as mean differences between interventions at a certain follow-up point compared with baseline.