Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182492

Comparative genome-wide methylation analysis of longissimus dorsi muscles between Japanese black (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes cattle

Xibi Fang 1,#, Zhihui Zhao 1,#, Haibin Yu 1, Guangpeng Li 2, Ping Jiang 1, Yuwei Yang 1, Runjun Yang 1,*, Xianzhong Yu 1,3,*
Editor: Sanjay B Jadhao4
PMCID: PMC5542662  PMID: 28771560

Abstract

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in expression of genes in many biological processes including muscle growth and development. Its effects on economically important traits are evinced from reported significant differences in meat quality traits between Japanese black (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes cattle, thus presenting a unique model for analyzing the effects of DNA methylation on these traits. In the present study, we performed whole genome DNA methylation analysis in the two breeds by whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Overall, 23150 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified which were located in 8596 genes enriched in 9922 GO terms, of which 1046 GO terms were significantly enriched (p<0.05) including lipid translocation (GO: 0034204) and lipid transport (GO: 0015914). KEGG analysis showed that the DMR related genes were distributed among 276 pathways. Correlation analysis found that 331 DMRs were negatively correlated with the expression levels of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with 21 DMRs located in promoter regions. Our results identified novel candidate DMRs and DEGs correlated with meat quality traits, which will be valuable for future genomic and epigenomic studies of muscle development and for marker assisted selection of meat quality traits.

Introduction

Beef, which is rich in protein, iron, zinc, B vitamins and essential polyunsaturated fatty acids, is a source of high-quality nutrition for humans [1]. However, several diseases, such as heart disease, diabetes and obesity, have been linked with the consumption of fat from beef. Thus, beef breeding program should try to find a balance between eating quality and nutritional quality, which demands a better understanding of the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms controlling meat quality traits.

Advancement in DNA sequencing technology has led to rapid accumulation of data on individual sequence variations in livestock, including cattle [2, 3], which, in combination with the development of high-density bovine genotyping based genome-wide association studies [4, 5], makes it possible for selection of production traits and increased rate of genetic progress in livestock. However, quantitative traits such as meat quality traits are generally determined by many genes, thus the benefit of a particular genetic variant in marker-assisted selection is limited to the proportion of the variant contributing to the heritable phenotypic variance. More importantly, many of the variants detected using GWAS have been in regulatory regions which result in changes in gene expression rather than protein sequences, indicating that the regulatory mechanisms are possibly epigenetics in nature. It is imperative to understand how epigenetics affects phenotypes through the regulation of gene expression. Furthermore, sensory quality of meat is affected by many environmental factors (such as nutrition, stress, exposure to pollution) that likely exert their influence through epigenetic modifications [6].

Epigenetics is the study of heritable changes in gene expression that are not caused by DNA sequence changes [7]. Epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs. DNA methylation plays a central role in regulating many different biological processes, such as growth, development, genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation in females [8]. There is a clear link between abnormal DNA methylation and human diseases [9]. DNA methylation is a critical intermediate molecular phenotype which is considered as the linkage between genotypes and other macro-level phenotypes and maybe attributed to the missing heritability [10]. Current data suggest that genetic variation at specific loci is correlated with the quantitative traits of DNA methylation [11], and genetic variants at CpG sites (meSNPs) could cause changes in their methylation status. It is suggested in human studies that meSNPs attributed a large portion of observed signal from methylation-associated loci (meQTLs) and might be crucial in explaining the results of association between genetic variants and epigenetic changes.

In livestock, genome-wide methylation studies have been performed in chicken, pig, cattle, and sheep, especially in the high-value muscle tissues [6, 12]. The objective of the present study is to perform a comparative genome-wide methylation analysis of longissimus dorsi muscles between the Japanese Black (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes cattle, especially in DMRs and DEGs. Since significant differences exist in meat quality traits between the two breeds, further correlation analysis will allow us to identify DNA methylation variants correlated with meat quality traits, which will be valuable for future genomic and epigenomic studies of muscle development and for marker assisted selection of meat quality traits.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Animal care and experiments were performed according to the guideline established by the Regulation for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China, 2004) and approved by the Animal Welfare and Research Ethics Committee at Jilin University (Approval ID: 20140310).

Animals and samples

Three longissimus muscle (LM) tissue samples of Japanese black cattle (28 months old) and three LM samples of Chinese Red Steppes cattle (28 months old) were provided by the National Research Center for Animal Transgenic Bio-technology, Inner Mongolia University (Hohhot, China) and the Branch of Animal Science, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Gongzhuling, China), respectively. The three Japanese black cattle were randomly chosen from 20 males born from cows that were artificially inseminated with semen stocks from the same bull. The three Chinese Red Steppes cattle were similarly chosen from 20 males with a common father. The two farms housing the two groups of cattle were located at similar altitudes with similar natural weather conditions. The cattle in both groups were raised under similar normal conditions on a diet of corn and hay with access to feed and water ad libitum. The tissue samples were transported in dry ice and stored in the laboratory in liquid nitrogen.

Extraction of DNA and bisulfite conversion

DNA was extracted from longissimus muscle tissues with a DNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and the concentration of the genomic DNA was determined with a NanoDrop ND-2000 UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). The degradation and contamination of genomic DNA was monitored with 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Library preparation and quantification

Three DNA libraries for each breed were constructed and grouped by breed as WC_LC (Wagyu) and RC_LC (Chinese Red Steppes) for subsequent analysis. 5.2 μg genomic DNA spiked with 26 ng lambda DNA were fragmented to 200–300 bp by sonication with a focused-ultra sonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), followed by end repair and adenylation. Cytosine-methylated barcodes were ligated to sonicated DNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA bisulfite conversion was performed using the EZ DNA Methylation Gold kit (Zymo Research, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. After DNA bisulfite conversion, single-strand DNA fragments were PCR amplified using the KAPA HiFi HotStart Uracil + ReadyMix (2X) (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA). Library size was quantified by quantitative PCR and a Qubit® 2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, CA, USA), and the insert size was checked on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Whole genome bisulfite sequencing and identification of DMRs

The libraries from 6 samples were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq2500 platform and 125 nt paired-end reads were generated by Novogene (Novogene, Beijing, China). Read sequences were produced by the Illumina pipeline with FastQ format and were pre-processed by in-house perl scripts. At first, all parts of the 3’ adapter oligonucleotide sequences were filtered out. Secondly, if the percentage of unknown bases (Ns) was greater than 10% the read was removed. Thirdly, reads with low quality (more than 50% of bases with PHRED score< = 5) were trimmed. At the same time, Q20, Q30 and GC content were calculated. All of the subsequent analyses were based on the remaining clean reads that passed the filters.

After filtering the low quality reads, the clean reads data were aligned to the Ensembl bovine reference genome (Bos taurus UMD_3.1.1) and the bisulfite mapping of methylation sites were performed by Bismark (version 0.12.5) [13] with score_min L, 0, -0.2 and then indexed using Bowtie2 [14]. At first, the reference genome and clean reads were transformed into bisulfite-converted version (C-to-T and G-to-A converted). Secondly, sequence read which produced a unique best alignment from the two alignment processes (original top and bottom strand) was then compared to the normal genomic sequence and the methylation status of all cytosine positions in the reads were identified. The reads that aligned to the same regions of genome were regarded as duplicated ones. The sequencing depth and coverage were estimated using deduplicated reads. The data of methylation extractor were transformed into bigWig format for visualization using IGV browser. The sodium bisulfite non-conversion rate of bovine genome was calculated as the percentage of cytosine sequenced at cytosine reference positions in the lambda genome.

To identify the differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes, we referenced the modeled of Hao. Y. et al [1] to estimate methylation level [15]. DMRs were identified using a sliding-window approach of swDMR software (http://122.228.158.106/swDMR/) [16] and the window is set to 1000 bp and step length at 100 bp. Fisher test is implemented to detect the DMRs.

GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of genes related to DMRs.

Gene related to DMRs were implemented by the GOseq R package [17], in which gene length bias was corrected. GO terms with corrected p values of less than 0.05 were considered significantly enriched. KOBAS software [18] was used to test the statistical enrichment of DMR-related genes in KEGG pathways [19, 20]. Pathway with a corrected p value <0.05 was considered as significantly enriched.

Sample preparation for RNA‑seq analysis

Total RNA was isolated from longissimus dorsi muscles using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was treated with DNase I (NEB, Beijing, China), extracted with phenol-chloroform, and precipitated with ethanol. The quality and quantity of total RNA were determined using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The mRNA was purified from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. 1.5 μg of mRNA from each sample was used to construct six cDNA libraries for sequencing. The mRNA was treated with a Thermomixer (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) to generate fragments with an average size of 200 bp (200 ± 25 bp) for the paired-end libraries. The fragmented mRNA was then used as templates for synthesizing the first-strand cDNA. The double-stranded cDNAs were purified and ligated to adaptors for Illumina paired-end sequencing. Library concentration was quantified by qPCR and a Qubit® 2.0 Flurometer (Life Technologies, CA, USA), and the insert size was checked on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The cDNA libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform by the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) and 100 nt paired-end reads were generated.

Quantification of gene expression levels and identification of DEGs

According to our data, the EB-Seq algorithm was applied to filter differentially expressed genes for the WC_LC and RC_LC groups and the URL of the GTF file used to annotate the EB-Seq is ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-79/gtf/bos_taurus/Bos_taurus.UMD3.1.79.gtf.gz. After significance analysis and FDR (false discovery rate) analysis[21], we selected the DEGs according to the Log2FC >0.585 or <-0.585, FDR <0.05.

Association analysis

For association analysis, a set of differentially expressed genes with differential methylation was obtained from the intersection between the set of differentially methylated genes and the set of differentially expressed genes. Negative correlations were identified by correlation analysis between the methylation level of DMRs and the expression level of the corresponding genes (r with negative value). Due to the small size of the sample, the present data were not further screened with r2 and p values. In addition, GO analysis was performed on negatively correlated genes in Biological Process, Molecular Function, Cellular Component, their sub-categories and KEGG pathway.

Results

Bisulfite sequencing and DNA methylation profiling

The BS conversion rates of genomic DNA ranged from 99.61% to 99.72%, and a total of 668.37 Gbp of raw sequence data was obtained from 6 samples. After filtering out low quality data, 630.39 Gbp clean sequences were mapped to Bos taurus (UMD_3.1.1) with Q30 of clean full-length reads ranging from 86.15 to 90.84%. High quality methylation maps of the two bovine breeds were obtained and the unique mapping rates ranged from 69.57% to 81.82%. The details of sequencing data quality were shown in Table 1. The results of WGBS analyses identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) covering almost the entire genome with sufficient depth and high resolution. The average distribution coverage of the genome in 6 samples was shown in S1 Fig.

Table 1. Sequencing data by whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) for Japanese Black cattle and Chinese Red Steppes.

Samples Raw Bases Clean Bases Error Rate Q20 Q30 GC Content BS Conversion Rate Total reads Mapped reads Mapping rate(%)
WC_LM3 114.15G 97.76G 0.05% 91.65% 86.15% 21.31% 99.72% 391054243 272063147 69.57
WC_LM1 118.16G 110.44G 0.04% 92.87% 87.74% 24.69% 99.63% 441776127 352743588 79.85
WC_LM2 127.22G 115.88G 0.04% 92.86% 87.41% 24.56% 99.61% 463516936 364168595 78.57
RC_LM1 108.14G 100.9G 0.03% 95.00% 90.72% 24.79% 99.68% 403581374 327796966 81.22
RC_LM2 118.51G 109.13G 0.03% 93.98% 89.10% 24.63% 99.63% 436533061 341001097 78.12
RC_LM3 102.19G 96.28G 0.03% 94.97% 90.84% 23.97% 99.65% 385132178 315113299 81.82

WC_LM1, WC_LM2, WC_LM3: longissimus dorsi muscle samples of Japanese black cattle (Wagyu); RC_LM1, RC_LM2, RC_LM3: longissimus dorsi muscle samples of Chinese Red Steppes.

CpGs, CHHs and CHGs (H = C, T and A) were methylated at different levels. 48.27–64.61% of CpGs in the whole genome were methylated while only 0.07–0.10% and 0.8–0.13% cytosines in the CHG and CHH contexts were methylated, respectively (Table 2). The distribution details of methylated cytosines in the contexts of CpGs, CHHs and CHGs in whole genome were shown in S1 Table.

Table 2. Methylation levels of all CpG sites in genomes of Japanese Black cattle and Chinese Red Steppes.

Samples mC percent(%) mCpG percent(%) mCHG percent(%) mCHH percent(%)
WC_LM3 2.47% 48.27% 0.07% 0.10%
WC_LM1 2.88% 56.74% 0.07% 0.08%
WC_LM2 2.93% 57.60% 0.08% 0.10%
RC_LM1 2.88% 56.32% 0.09% 0.12%
RC_LM2 3.30% 64.61% 0.10% 0.13%
RC_LM3 2.91% 56.81% 0.09% 0.12%

WC_LM1, WC_LM2, WC_LM3: longissimus dorsi muscle samples of Japanese black cattle (Wagyu); RC_LM1, RC_LM2, RC_LM3: longissimus dorsi muscle samples of Chinese Red Steppes. MC percentage (%): percentage of genome-wide methylated cytosines. MCpG percentage (%): percentage of methylated cytosines in CG context. MCHG percentage (%): percentage of methylated cytosines in CHG context. MCHH percentage (%): percentage of methylated cytosines in CHH context.

To better understand DNA methylation levels at various functional genomic elements, such as promoters, exons, introns, etc., the 2 kb region upstream of the TSS point (defined as the promoter region) of each gene was equally divided into 20 bins, and the corresponding bin level on C locus of all genes were averaged. For mC sites in each context, the average methylation levels and the genome-wide landscape of distribution of various functional genomic elements of 6 samples were built by ggplot2 R package[22] as shown in Fig 1. Similar tendencies of methylation levels in all samples were observed in different genetic elements in the three mC contexts, without any significant differences among them. Overall, the DNA methylation levels in introns were the highest, followed by exons and 3’ UTR, with 5’ UTR showing the lowest level. In promoter regions, the proximal regions had the lowest DNA methylation levels, followed by the intermediate regions, with the distal regions having the highest levels. As for mC in CHH context, the 5’ proximal regions of intron had the highest methylation levels in all samples which were different from mCs in other contexts.

Fig 1. DNA methylation levels across genomic elements in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes.

Fig 1

Abscissa represents different genomic elements, the ordinate represents the level of methylation and different colors represents different sequence contexts (CpG, CHG, CHH). WC_LM1, WC_LM2, WC_LM3: longissimus dorsi muscle samples of Japanese black cattle (Wagyu); RC_LM1, RC_LM2, RC_LM3: longissimus dorsi muscle samples of Chinese Red Steppes.

The difference and trend in genomic methylation levels between samples can be analyzed by regional cluster classification analysis to understand the biological significance [23]. Using hierarchical clustering method, we analyzed the whole genomic methylation in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes cattle, as shown in the heat maps of Fig 2, which revealed a clear separation between the two breeds. Our results also showed that the biological variation among the three samples within the same breed was extremely low. In addition, the cluster analysis results for the genomic methylation in different functional regions were summarized in S2 Fig.

Fig 2. The cluster analysis of genomic methylation levels in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes.

Fig 2

Heat map displays highly methylated loci in red and sparsely methylated loci in blue.

Characterization of DMRs

In total, we compared the methylation levels of longissimus dorsi muscle from the two breeds and identified 23,150 DMRs in gene bodies or promoter regions from 8,596 genes that were significantly different between Wagyu and Chinese Red Steppes (corrected p< 0.05) which have different meat quality traits. Among the DMRs, 11,943 corresponded to 6,072 genes with higher methylation levels in Wagyu than that in Chinese Red Steppes, whereas 11,207 corresponded to 5,034 genes with lower methylation levels in Wagyu (Fig 3). The top 20 DMRs were listed in Table 3 by ascending order of corrected p value. Interestingly, 2,510 genes possessed multiple DMRs with both hyper-methylated (higher methylation level in Wagyu than in Chinese Red Steppes) regions and hypo-methylated (lower methylation level in Wagyu than in Chinese Red Steppes) regions, such as acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 6 (ACSL6), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), 1-acylglycerol-3-phosphate O-acyltransferase 4 (AGPAT4), upstream binding protein 1(UBP1).

Fig 3. Numbers of DMRs, hyper-methylated genes, and hypo-methylated genes in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes.

Fig 3

(A) Numbers of DMRs; (B) Numbers of genes related to DMRs. DMRs: differentially methylated regions.

Table 3. Top 20 DMRs based on the ratio of methylation levels between Japanese Black cattle and Chinese Red Steppes.

Chrom Stat Gene ID Gene context Gene Name
29 hyper ENSBTAG00000008274 exon,intron MUC5B
4 hyper ENSBTAG00000008542 exon,intron SSPO
19 hyper ENSBTAG00000039599 exon HOXB4
24 hyper ENSBTAG00000022819 exon ONECUT2
3 hyper ENSBTAG00000000963 exon,intron,promoter -
5 hyper ENSBTAG00000013912 intron TXNRD1
13 hyper ENSBTAG00000019508 intron SEC61A2
3 hyper ENSBTAG00000015154 exon,intron MCL1
3 hyper ENSBTAG00000015154 exon,utr5,promoter MCL1
17 hyper ENSBTAG00000010464 promoter MN1
1 hypo ENSBTAG00000009942 intron PLCL2
18 hypo ENSBTAG00000009364 exon,intron -
18 hypo ENSBTAG00000009364 exon -
18 hypo ENSBTAG00000009364 exon,intron,promoter -
9 hypo ENSBTAG00000039329 intron RAET1G
9 hypo ENSBTAG00000047902 intron -
17 hypo ENSBTAG00000014111 intron INPP4B
3 hypo ENSBTAG00000038025 promoter H2B
3 hypo ENSBTAG00000038476 exon HIST2H2AB
3 hypo ENSBTAG00000040098 exon -

DMRs: differentially methylated regions; chrom: location of DMRs on chromosomes; stat: status of methylation levels; hyper: Japanese Black cattle have higher methylation levels than Chinese Red Steppes; hypo: Japanese Black cattle have lower methylation levels than Chinese Red Steppes; promoter: the 2kb region upstream of the TSS point.

The length of DMRs ranged between 3 nt to 3,780 nt (S3 Fig). Most of the DMRs were located at introns (73.66%), followed by exons (14.36%) and regulatory regions (11.98%), such as promoters, 5’UTRs and 3’UTRs, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. DMR distribution among different genetic elements in Japanese Black cattle and Chinese Red Steppes.

Gene context Hyper-methylated Hypo-methylated
PROMOTER 1581 793
5’ UTR 351 92
EXON 2478 1599
INTRON 10461 10444
3’ UTR 309 273

DMRs: differentially methylated regions; gene context: functional region names; promoter: the 2kb region upstream of the TSS point.

Gene ontology and KEGG enrichment analyses of genes related to DMRs.

The identified DMRs were functionally classified by GO analysis. Functional enrichments on 23,150 DMRs (corrected p< 0.05) by gene ontology analysis found that 8,596 genes related to DMRs were enriched in 9,922 GO terms, among which 1,046 GO terms were significantly enriched (corrected p< 0.05). The most significant functional terms were binding (GO: 0005488) of hyper-methylated genes and protein binding (GO: 0005515) of hypo-methylated genes. In terms of biological process, the most significant functional terms were localization (GO: 0051179) of hyper-methylated genes and anatomical structure morphogenesis (GO: 0009653) of hypo-methylated genes. In cellular component, the most significant functional terms were plasma membrane parts (GO: 0044459) of hyper-methylated genes and cell projection (GO: 0042995) of hypo-methylated genes. The top 30 GO terms were listed in Fig 4 by ascending order of corrected p value.

Fig 4. Histogram of enriched GO terms.

Fig 4

The ordinate represents the enriched GO terms; the abscissa represents the number of genes; “*” represents the GO term significantly enriched (corrected p< 0.05) (only top 30 GO terms are listed by ascending order of corrected p values).

KEGG enrichment analysis of genes related to DMRs was also conducted for both hyper-methylated and hypo-methylated genes. Overall, 276 pathways were identified, such as calcium signaling pathway (bta04020), focal adhesion (bta04510), cAMP signaling pathway (bta04024), and cGMP-PKG signaling pathway (bta04022), and the top 20 in ascending order of corrected p value were listed in Fig 5. Results showed that calcium signaling pathway (bta04020, corrected p = 0.002), glutamatergic synapse (bta04724, corrected p = 0.047) and cAMP signaling pathway (bta04024, corrected p = 0.047) were significantly enriched in hyper-methylated genes (corrected p< 0.05), with calcium signaling pathway showed the highest enrichment (S4 Fig). However, no pathway was significantly enriched in hypo-methylated genes (corrected p> 0.05).

Fig 5. Scatterplot of enriched KEGG pathways.

Fig 5

The ordinate represents the enriched pathways, and the abscissa represents the rich factor of corresponding pathways; the size of the spots represents the number of genes related to DMRs enriched in each pathway, while the color of the spot represents the corrected p value of each pathway. The rich factors indicate the ratio of the number of DMGs mapped to a certain pathway to the total number of genes mapped to this pathway. Greater rich factor means greater enrichment. DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DMGs: differentially methylated genes.

Association analysis between DMRs and DEGs

We next analyzed the correlation between the methylation levels of DMRs and the expression levels of DEGs. The results indicated that 147 DMR related genes had negative correlation with the expression levels of DEGs (Table 5), of which 19 genes had DMRs in promoter regions, 50 genes had DMRs in exons, 129 genes had DMRs in introns and only 7 genes and 5 genes had DMRs in 3’UTRs and 5’UTRs, respectively (Fig 6). For genes with negative correlation, 56 genes were enriched in 969 GO terms, of which 259 GO terms were significant (corrected p< 0.05) including positive regulation of fat cell differentiation (GO: 0045600, corrected p = 0.005), glycerol metabolic process (GO: 0006071, corrected p = 0.010), negative regulation of low-density lipoprotein particle receptor catabolic process (GO: 0032804, corrected p = 0.016), triglyceride metabolic process (GO: 0006641, corrected p = 0.046), negative regulation of lipoprotein lipase activity (GO: 0051005, corrected p = 0.031) and glycerophospholipid metabolic process (GO: 0006650, corrected p = 0.039). In addition, the 56 genes were enriched in 118 pathways, of which 11 pathways were significant (corrected p< 0.05) such as ECM-receptor interaction (bta04512, corrected p = 0.005), propanoate metabolism (bta00640, corrected p = 0.029), cGMP-PKG signaling pathway (bta04022, corrected p = 0.032), carbon metabolism (bta01200, corrected p = 0.044), fatty acid degradation (bat00071, corrected p = 0.047) (Fig 7). Interestingly, 13 genes with negative correlation were enriched in metabolic pathway term (bta01100). Among negatively correlated genes, 6 genes with DMRs in promoter region were enriched in 10 pathways in which 4 pathways were significantly enriched (corrected p< 0.05) (S5 Fig).

Table 5. DEGs with gene expression level negatively correlated with DMRs methylation level.

Gene ID Gene context Gene Name
ENSBTAG00000005744 exon, intron COQ2
ENSBTAG00000017661 exon, intron RFX2
ENSBTAG00000019448 exon, intron, utr5 CLDN7
ENSBTAG00000007319 exon, intron JAG2
ENSBTAG00000021024 exon, intron MACF1
ENSBTAG00000010851 exon SEPHS2
ENSBTAG00000018966 exon, intron PLCE1
ENSBTAG00000019162 exon, intron RNMTL1
ENSBTAG00000015794 exon NES
ENSBTAG00000021457 exon, intron EFEMP2
ENSBTAG00000019517 exon, intron ELN
ENSBTAG00000021919 exon, intron NAV1
ENSBTAG00000038439 exon, utr5, promoter H1F0
ENSBTAG00000021381 exon, intron, utr3 DAAM2
ENSBTAG00000019569 exon, intron, utr5 CD151
ENSBTAG00000017574 exon, intron LMNA
ENSBTAG00000000072 exon, intron TFB2M
ENSBTAG00000030258 exon, intron CDC42EP1
ENSBTAG00000021672 exon, utr3 RGS1
ENSBTAG00000005083 exon, intron TULP4
ENSBTAG00000005762 exon, intron, utr5, promoter LYNX1
ENSBTAG00000016269 exon, intron ME2
ENSBTAG00000010682 promoter, exon, intron DDR1
ENSBTAG00000003786 exon, intron GCGR
ENSBTAG00000012505 exon, intron ARHGEF17
ENSBTAG00000019375 exon, intron SCARF2
ENSBTAG00000014885 exon, intron MYOM3
ENSBTAG00000010402 exon, intron MYH9
ENSBTAG00000018629 exon, intron CWF19L2
ENSBTAG00000019967 exon, intron RASA3
ENSBTAG00000006187 exon, intron MFAP4
ENSBTAG00000004283 exon, intron PPFIBP1
ENSBTAG00000038844 exon ANKRD35
ENSBTAG00000003619 exon, intron SEC24D
ENSBTAG00000013334 exon, intron CSF3R
ENSBTAG00000013869 exon, intron, utr3 SH3BP4
ENSBTAG00000012849 exon, intron COL4A1
ENSBTAG00000013004 exon, utr3, intron ITIH5
ENSBTAG00000030340 exon, utr3, intron -
ENSBTAG00000008518 exon, intron MED25
ENSBTAG00000033835 exon, intron, utr3 MPZ
ENSBTAG00000037383 exon, intron AKAP13
ENSBTAG00000000961 exon, utr3 NEURL2
ENSBTAG00000000054 promoter, exon, intron SNAPC4
ENSBTAG00000006213 exon, utr5, promoter IFT27
ENSBTAG00000017528 exon, intron SNAI3
ENSBTAG00000002024 exon, intron ASB18
ENSBTAG00000001396 exon, intron ADAMTS7
ENSBTAG00000009733 exon, intron FBP1
ENSBTAG00000019002 exon, intron SLC2A12

DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DEGs: differentially expressed genes; gene context: functional region names; promoter: the 2kb region upstream of the TSS point.

Fig 6. Distribution among different genomic elements of DEGs with expression level negatively correlated with DMRs methylation level.

Fig 6

DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DEGs: differentially expressed genes.

Fig 7. Pathway enrichment of DEGs with expression level negatively correlated with DMRs methylation level.

Fig 7

Abscissa represents the value of log2 (p value) and ordinate represents the pathway name; Red bars indicate corrected p< 0.05. DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DEGs: differentially expressed genes.

Discussion

DMR is an important epigenetic marker which may be involved in regulation of gene expression by changing chromatin structure or transcription efficiency under different conditions [24]. Although DNA methylation analysis has been performed on cattle [12, 25, 26], this study is the first to systematically compare the genome-wide methylation profiles in longissimus dorsi muscle between Japanese black cattle and Chinese Red Steppes, between which significant difference exist in overall meat quality traits.

DNA methylation profiles in longissimus dorsi muscle

The genome-wide methylation patterns in functional genomic regions were very similar between the two breeds. However, there were differences among three mC contexts which might be related to the sequence differences in different genetic elements. The majority of DMRs were small fragments (50–1000 nt > 90% of DMRs), which suggested that methylation changes within a small regions could play an important role on the regulation of gene expression. There were more DMRs with higher methylation level and less DMRs with lower methylation in Wagyu in comparison to Chinese Red Steppes, and DMRs were mainly concentrated in the intron regions (> 70%) with only a small proportion distributed in the 3’ UTRs and 5’ UTRs. In addition, the distribution of certain DMRs in either hyper-methylated or hypo-methylated status with the same gene indicated that different methylation status in different regions might have different regulatory functions on gene expression.

Correlation analysis between DMRs and signal pathways

Analyses of pathways and genes related to DMRs revealed that the hyper-methylated genes were significantly concentrated in three pathways: calcium signaling pathway (bta04020, corrected p = 0.002), glutamatergic synapse (bta04724, corrected p = 0.047) and cAMP signaling pathway (bta04024, corrected p = 0.047) (S6 Fig). The KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that calcium signaling pathway was the most significantly correlated pathway, which is the key pathway exerting allosteric regulation on many proteins by the calcium ions signaling effects, such as activation of ion channels or as a secondary messenger.

It is reported that Caveolin 1 (CAV1) gene has a higher expression level in adipocytes [27], and CAV1 gene knockout leads to imbalance in lipid metabolism [28]. Phospholipase C (PLC) cleaves phospholipids into free fatty acids (FFA), lysophospholipids and diacylglycerol, and the relative activities of PLC are highly correlated with the decrease of phospholipids and the increase of free fatty acids [29]. These studies indicated that CAV1 and PLC genes are involved in lipid and fatty acid metabolism. A mutation in the ryanodine receptor (RyR) gene is found to be correlated with malignant hyperthermia in lean, heavily muscled swine breeds [30]. In this study, CAV1, PLC and RYR genes were identified as differentially methylated genes between the two breeds, which suggested that certain differentially methylated genes in calcium signaling pathway could affect the metabolism of the skeletal muscles. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), a key molecule found in cAMP signal pathway involving the G protein coupled receptors [31], is involved in adipocyte differentiation and function. The present study identified three types of PPARs: alpha, gamma, and delta [32]. PPARγ is expressed in liver, kidney, heart, muscle, adipose tissue, and others [33]. As a dietary lipid sensor, the activation of PPARγ results in lipid metabolism in muscle [34]. Interestingly, all the three pathways could be regulated by calcium ions concentration, which indicated that this might be the core pathway in the regulation of muscle metabolism [35].

Negative correlation between the methylation levels of DMRs and differential expressions of DEGs

There is a complex relationship between gene methylation and gene expression level. Current research data suggest that methylation in the promoter region blocks transcription initiation, but the function on gene expression of DNA methylation within gene body has not been clearly understood [24].

As seen in Table 5, the DMRs in the promoter and gene body regions were negatively correlated with gene expression level. Enoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase (EHHADH) and 4-N-trimethylaminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH9A1) genes were enriched in the pathway of fatty acid degradation (p = 0.047, p< 0.05), during which fatty acids are broken down into acetyl-CoA to enter into the citric acid cycle for energy production in animals [36]. It seemed that DMRs related to genes in the fatty acid degradation pathway might affect fatty acid composition in meat through regulation of gene expression levels. EHHADH gene was identified by GWAS as one of the 20 promising novel genes associated with milk fatty acid traits in Chinese Holstein [37]. Furthermore, EHHADH and angiopoietin-like protein 4 (ANGPTL4) genes both belong to the PPAR signaling pathway (bta03320), which is a key biological pathway in determining meat quality traits in mammals by involving in lipid metabolism. ANGPTL4 is mainly expressed in liver and adipose tissues [38] and plays important roles in the regulation of lipid metabolism. Previous studies have suggested that a SNP in ANGPTL4 is associated with intramuscular fat [39] and the expression level of ANGPTL4 affects meat quality traits of pigs [40]. Recent studies have shown that acyl-CoA synthetase family member 3 (ACSF3), in which DMRs in promoter region were found in the present study to be negatively correlated with the gene expression level, plays a critical role in mammal fatty acid synthesis in mitochondrion [41]. Thus EHHADH, ALDH9A1, ANGPTL4 and ACSF3 play important roles in fatty acid and lipid metabolism in muscle and regulation of these genes through DNA methylation might be part of the mechanisms in determining the difference in meat quality traits between the two breeds.

The classical theory on animal breeding believes that the appearance of a quantitative trait is the result of multiple genetic loci, in particular, a single polymorphic locus with multiple, differentially expressed alleles can give rise to the quantitative trait variation within a natural population [42]. Many of the differentially methylated genes identified in the present study between Wagyu and Chinese Red Steppes are also found to be differentially methylated in genes related to lipid metabolism and fatty acid metabolism, such as fatty acid synthase (FASN) which is shown to be related to fatty acid composition in a genome-wide association study of Japanese black cattle [43], and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A (CPT1A), fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1) and acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1 (ACSL1) genes which are well-known genes in the pathways of fatty acid metabolism and fatty acid degradation. In addition, other genes known to affect meat quality traits of cattle are also related to the lipid metabolism and fatty acid metabolism (insulin like growth factor 2 (IGF2), leptin (OB), lipase hormone sensitive (HSL), diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1) and fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3)) [4449]. We believed that the methylation of these genes might partially contribute to the significant variance in meat quality traits between Japanese black cattle and Chinese Red Steppes. However, the regulatory epigenetic mechanisms of these genes and genetic regions on bovine meat quality traits require further study.

Conclusion

In the present study, whole genome, high resolution DNA methylation profiles of longissimus dorsi muscles were established for Japanese black and Chinese Red Steppes cattle. Combined with transcriptomic analysis, our study investigated the genome-wide regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation at transcription level, and identified a number of novel and important genes associated with DMRs and pathways that might affect muscle development and meat quality traits in cattle, which needed to be further experimentally validated in the future. Our results provided valuable data to further our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms that control economic traits in cattle, which could be used in marker-assisted selection programs to improve beef production.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Distribution of genomic sequencing depth.

(A) The distribution of sequence coverage at the genome of all samples, abscissa represents the depth of coverage and ordinate represents its frequency. (B) The accumulated distribution of sequence coverage at genome of all samples, abscissa represents the depth of coverage and ordinate represents the ratio of coverage not less than the depth of the total number of base sites; different lines with different colors represent different samples.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Clusters of different functional regions by methylation levels.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Distribution of DMR lengths.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Pathways enriched for genes related to DMRs with higher methylation levels in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) than that in Chinese Red Steppes.

The ordinate represents the enriched pathways, and the abscissa represents the rich factor of corresponding pathways; the size of the spots represented the number of genes related to DMRs enriched in each pathway, while the color of the spot represents the corrected p value of each pathway. The rich factors indicate the ratio of the number of DMGs mapped to a certain pathway to the total number of genes mapped to this pathway. Greater rich factor means greater enrichment. DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DMGs: differentially methylated genes.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Pathway enrichment of genes with negative correlation between methylation levels of DMRs in promoter and expression levels of mRNA.

Abscissa represents the value of log2 (p value) and ordinate represents the pathway name; red bars indicate corrected p< 0.05.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. KEGG pathways with genes related to significantly enriched DMRs with higher methylation in Wagyu.

Genes with red marker are related to DMRs with higher methylation levels in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) than that in Chinese Red Steppes. DMRs: differentially methylated regions.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Comparison of DNA methylation patterns between the two groups.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Branch of Animal Science, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences and National Research Center for Animal Transgenic Bio-technology, Inner Mongolia University for animal sampling. The authors thank Novel Bioinformatics Co., Ltd for technical help and KEGG for providing pathway figures in S6 Fig.

Data Availability

The authors state that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions presented in the article are represented fully within the article. Sequence data has been submitted to the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) and the accession number is GSE98818.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31372278), the National Major Special Project on New Varieties Cultivation for Transgenis Organisms (2016ZX08009003-006), the National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program, no.2013AA102505), the Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program (No. 20170519014JH), the Jilin province industrial technology research and development program (2016C032) and the Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University (Grant number 2015073).

References

  • 1.McNeill S, Van Elswyk ME. Red meat in global nutrition. Meat science. 2012;92(3):166–73. Epub 2012/06/05. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.03.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ramos AM, Crooijmans RP, Affara NA, Amaral AJ, Archibald AL, Beever JE, et al. Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6524 Epub 2009/08/06. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006524 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2716536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stothard P, Choi JW, Basu U, Sumner-Thomson JM, Meng Y, Liao X, et al. Whole genome resequencing of black Angus and Holstein cattle for SNP and CNV discovery. BMC genomics. 2011;12:559 Epub 2011/11/17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-559 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3229636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma L, Runesha HB, Dvorkin D, Garbe JR, Da Y. Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies. BMC bioinformatics. 2008;9:315 Epub 2008/07/23. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-315 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2503991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, et al. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5350 Epub 2009/04/25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2669730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Couldrey C, Brauning R, Bracegirdle J, Maclean P, Henderson HV, McEwan JC. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns and transcription analysis in sheep muscle. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101853 Epub 2014/07/11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101853 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4092064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature. 2004;429(6990):457–63. Epub 2004/05/28. doi: 10.1038/nature02625 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nature reviews Genetics. 2013;14(3):204–20. Epub 2013/02/13. doi: 10.1038/nrg3354 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nature reviews Genetics. 2005;6(8):597–610. Epub 2005/09/02. doi: 10.1038/nrg1655 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maher B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature. 2008;456(7218):18–21. Epub 2008/11/07. doi: 10.1038/456018a . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhi D, Aslibekyan S, Irvin MR, Claas SA, Borecki IB, Ordovas JM, et al. SNPs located at CpG sites modulate genome-epigenome interaction. Epigenetics. 2013;8(8):802–6. Epub 2013/07/03. doi: 10.4161/epi.25501 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3883783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang YZ, Sun JJ, Zhang LZ, Li CJ, Womack JE, Li ZJ, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles and their relationships with mRNA and the microRNA transcriptome in bovine muscle tissue (Bos taurine). Scientific reports. 2014;4:6546 Epub 2014/10/14. doi: 10.1038/srep06546 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4194443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krueger F, Andrews SR. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2011;27(11):1571–2. Epub 2011/04/16. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3102221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012;9(4):357 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hao Y, Cui Y, Gu X. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles changes associated with constant heat stress in pigs as measured by bisulfite sequencing. Scientific Reports. 2016;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Z, Li X, Jiang Y, Shao Q, Liu Q, Chen BY, et al. swDMR: A Sliding Window Approach to Identify Differentially Methylated Regions Based on Whole Genome Bisulfite Sequencing. PloS one. 2015;10(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14 Epub 2010/02/06. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2872874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, Wei L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(19):3787–93. Epub 2005/04/09. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti430 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic acids research. 2000;28(1):27–30. Epub 1999/12/11. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc102409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG Tools for Functional Characterization of Genome and Metagenome Sequences. Journal of molecular biology. 2016;428(4):726–31. Epub 2015/11/21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural brain research. 2001;125(1–2):279–84. Epub 2001/10/30. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis: Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated; 2009. 180–5 p.
  • 23.Smallwood SA, Lee HJ, Angermueller C, Krueger F, Saadeh H, Peat J, et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat Methods. 2014;11(8):817–20. Epub 2014/07/22. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3035 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4117646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature reviews Genetics. 2012;13(7):484–92. Epub 2012/05/30. doi: 10.1038/nrg3230 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salilew-Wondim D, Fournier E, Hoelker M, Saeed-Zidane M, Tholen E, Looft C, et al. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Patterns of Bovine Blastocysts Developed In Vivo from Embryos Completed Different Stages of Development In Vitro. PloS one. 2015;10(11):e0140467 Epub 2015/11/05. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140467 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4633222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mendonca Ados S, Guimaraes AL, da Silva NM, Caetano AR, Dode MA, Franco MM. Characterization of the IGF2 Imprinted Gene Methylation Status in Bovine Oocytes during Folliculogenesis. PloS one. 2015;10(10):e0142072 Epub 2015/10/31. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142072 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4627647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li WP, Liu P, Pilcher BK, Anderson RG. Cell-specific targeting of caveolin-1 to caveolae, secretory vesicles, cytoplasm or mitochondria. Journal of Cell Science. 2001;114(Pt 7):1397–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Razani B, Combs TP, Wang XB, Frank PG, Park DS, Russell RG, et al. Caveolin-1-deficient mice are lean, resistant to diet-induced obesity, and show hypertriglyceridemia with adipocyte abnormalities. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(10):8635–47. Epub 2001/12/12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110970200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang D, Zhang M, Bian H, Xu W, Xu X, Zhu Y, et al. Changes of phospholipase A(2) and C activities during dry-cured duck processing and their relationship with intramuscular phospholipid degradation. Food chemistry. 2014;145:997–1001. Epub 2013/10/17. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fujii J, Otsu K, Zorzato F, Leon SD, Khanna VK, Weiler JE, et al. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science. 1991;253(5018):448–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gilman AG. G Proteins: Transducers of Receptor-Generated Signals. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1987;56(56):615–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Berger J, Moller DE. The mechanisms of action of PPARs: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 1249–59 p.
  • 33.Tyagi S, Gupta P, Saini AS, Kaushal C, Sharma S. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor: A family of nuclear receptors role in various diseases. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research. 2011;2(4):236–40. Epub 2012/01/17. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.90879 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3255347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ebrahimi M, Rajion MA, Goh YM. Effects of oils rich in linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids on fatty acid profile and gene expression in goat meat. Nutrients. 2014;6(9):3913–28. Epub 2014/09/26. doi: 10.3390/nu6093913 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4179195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Maclennan DH, Ms P. Malignant Hyperthermia. Science. 1992;256(5058):789–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Máximo CO. Fatty acid degradation. Fatty Acids. 2011.
  • 37.Li C, Sun D, Zhang S, Wang S, Wu X, Zhang Q, et al. Genome wide association study identifies 20 novel promising genes associated with milk fatty acid traits in Chinese Holstein. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96186 Epub 2014/05/27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096186 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4032272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mamedova LK, Robbins K, Johnson BJ, Bradford BJ. Tissue expression of angiopoietin-like protein 4 in cattle. Journal of animal science. 2010;88(1):124–30. Epub 2009/09/29. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2258 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ren ZQ, Wu WJ, Liu WH, Zheng R, Li JL, Zuo B, et al. Differential expression and effect of the porcine ANGPTL4 gene on intramuscular fat. Genetics and molecular research: GMR. 2014;13(2):2949–58. Epub 2014/05/02. doi: 10.4238/2014.April.16.3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang J, Zhu X, Wang Z, Yao J, Zhao B, Liu G. Non-esterified fatty acids promote expression and secretion of angiopoietin-like protein 4 in calf hepatocytes cultured in vitro. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2015;401(1–2):141–6. Epub 2014/12/17. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2301-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Witkowski A, Thweatt J, Smith S. Mammalian ACSF3 protein is a malonyl-CoA synthetase that supplies the chain extender units for mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286(39):33729–36. Epub 2011/08/19. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.291591 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3190830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koning DJd. Identification of (non-) Mendelian factors affecting pork production. [S.l.: s.n.]; 2001.
  • 43.Sasago N, Abe T, Sakuma H, Kojima T, Uemoto Y. Genome-wide association study for carcass traits, fatty acid composition, chemical composition, sugar, and the effects of related candidate genes in Japanese Black cattle. Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. 2016. Epub 2016/04/27. doi: 10.1111/asj.12595 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fang XB, Zhang LP, Yu XZ, Li JY, Lu CY, Zhao ZH, et al. Association of HSL gene E1-c.276C>T and E8-c.51C>T mutation with economical traits of Chinese Simmental cattle. Molecular biology reports. 2014;41(1):105–12. Epub 2013/11/12. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2842-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goszczynski DE, Mazzucco JP, Ripoli MV, Villarreal EL, Rogberg-Munoz A, Mezzadra CA, et al. Characterization of the bovine gene LIPE and possible influence on fatty acid composition of meat. Meta gene. 2014;2:746–60. Epub 2015/01/22. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2014.09.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4287880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Murdoch BM, Li C, Wang Z, Fu A, et al. Polymorphisms and haplotypes in the bovine neuropeptide Y, growth hormone receptor, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 2, and uncoupling proteins 2 and 3 genes and their associations with measures of growth, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass merit in beef cattle. Journal of animal science. 2008;86(1):1–16. Epub 2007/09/06. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-799 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Han RH, Zan LS, Yang DP, Hao RC. [SNPs detection of IGF2 gene and its relationship with carcass and meat quality traits in Qinchuan cattle]. Yi chuan = Hereditas / Zhongguo yi chuan xue hui bian ji. 2008;30(12):1579–84. Epub 2008/12/17. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aviles C, Polvillo O, Pena F, Juarez M, Martinez AL, Molina A. Associations between DGAT1, FABP4, LEP, RORC, and SCD1 gene polymorphisms and fat deposition in Spanish commercial beef. Journal of animal science. 2013;91(10):4571–7. Epub 2013/08/24. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6402 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.de Oliveira JA, da Cunha CM, Crispim Bdo A, Seno Lde O, Fernandes AR, Nogueira Gde P, et al. Association of the leptin gene with carcass characteristics in Nellore cattle. Animal biotechnology. 2013;24(3):229–42. Epub 2013/06/20. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2013.770008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Distribution of genomic sequencing depth.

(A) The distribution of sequence coverage at the genome of all samples, abscissa represents the depth of coverage and ordinate represents its frequency. (B) The accumulated distribution of sequence coverage at genome of all samples, abscissa represents the depth of coverage and ordinate represents the ratio of coverage not less than the depth of the total number of base sites; different lines with different colors represent different samples.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Clusters of different functional regions by methylation levels.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Distribution of DMR lengths.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Pathways enriched for genes related to DMRs with higher methylation levels in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) than that in Chinese Red Steppes.

The ordinate represents the enriched pathways, and the abscissa represents the rich factor of corresponding pathways; the size of the spots represented the number of genes related to DMRs enriched in each pathway, while the color of the spot represents the corrected p value of each pathway. The rich factors indicate the ratio of the number of DMGs mapped to a certain pathway to the total number of genes mapped to this pathway. Greater rich factor means greater enrichment. DMRs: differentially methylated regions; DMGs: differentially methylated genes.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Pathway enrichment of genes with negative correlation between methylation levels of DMRs in promoter and expression levels of mRNA.

Abscissa represents the value of log2 (p value) and ordinate represents the pathway name; red bars indicate corrected p< 0.05.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. KEGG pathways with genes related to significantly enriched DMRs with higher methylation in Wagyu.

Genes with red marker are related to DMRs with higher methylation levels in Japanese black cattle (Wagyu) than that in Chinese Red Steppes. DMRs: differentially methylated regions.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Comparison of DNA methylation patterns between the two groups.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The authors state that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions presented in the article are represented fully within the article. Sequence data has been submitted to the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) and the accession number is GSE98818.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES