Abstract
Multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) is characterized by the development of numerous benign bony tumors (osteochondromas). Although it has been well established that MHE is caused by mutations in EXT1 and EXT2, which encode glycosyltransferase essential for heparan sulfate (HS) biosynthesis, the cellular origin and molecular mechanisms of MHE remain elusive. Here, we show that in Ext1 mutant mice, osteochondromas develop from mesenchymal stem cell–like progenitor cells residing in the perichondrium, and we show that enhanced BMP signaling in these cells is the primary signaling defect that leads to osteochondromagenesis. We demonstrate that progenitor cells in the perichondrium, including those in the groove of Ranvier, highly express HS and that Ext1 ablation targeted to the perichondrium results in the development of osteochondromas. Ext1-deficient perichondrial progenitor cells show enhanced BMP signaling and increased chondrogenic differentiation both in vitro and in vivo. Consistent with the functional role for enhanced BMP signaling in osteochondromagenesis, administration of the small molecule BMP inhibitor LDN-193189 suppresses osteochondroma formation in two MHE mouse models. Together, our results demonstrate a role for enhanced perichondrial BMP signaling in osteochondromagenesis in mice, and they suggest the possibility of pharmacological treatment of MHE with BMP inhibitors.
Keywords: Bone Biology
Osteochondromas develop from mesenchymal stem cell-like progenitor cells residing in the perichondrium due to enhanced BMP signaling in these cells.
Introduction
Heparan sulfate (HS) is a sulfated glycosaminoglycan found on cell surfaces and in the extracellular matrix. HS is functionally involved in diverse developmental processes. Endochondral ossification is one of such developmental processes in which HS plays a particularly important role (1). Multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) is a genetic bone disorder caused by heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in EXT1 or EXT2, both of which are required for HS biosynthesis. It is one of the most common inherited skeletal dysplasias in humans, with an estimated prevalence of at least 1 in 50,000 (2). EXT1 encodes the key N-acetylglucosamine/glucuronic acid copolymerase for elongation of the HS backbone, while EXT2 encodes a protein that associates with EXT1 protein and transports it to the Golgi apparatus, where HS synthesis occurs (3, 4). Homozygous ablation of either gene results in essentially complete abrogation of HS production in cells, while heterozygous cells, including somatic cells in patients of MHE, generally express HS at approximately half the level of WT cells (5, 6). MHE is characterized by the development of multiple cartilage-capped, bony protrusions, which are histologically defined as osteochondromas. Osteochondromas in MHE develop in bones of endochondral origin, such as long bones, rib bones, scapula, and vertebrae (7).
We previously demonstrated that stochastic inactivation of Ext1 in a small fraction of Col2a1-expressing cells using a Col2a1-CreERT transgene (8) and the loxP-modified allele Ext1flox (9) (Col2a1-CreERT;Ext1flox/flox mice, called Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice hereafter) results in the development of multiple osteochondromas and skeletal deformities in mice that closely resemble the human MHE phenotype in mice (10). Jones et al. (11) independently made essentially the same observation using a different genetic mouse model. These results point to the involvement of loss of heterozygosity in the pathogenesis of human MHE. Furthermore, the level of phenotypic recapitulation and the experimental tractability of the Col2a1-Ext1CKO stochastic KO model make it very useful for studying MHE.
While the previous knockout studies (10, 11) have provided a clue to the genetic mechanism of MHE, the molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to the development of multiple bone tumors remain elusive. In this paper, we sought to address two questions concerning the pathogenesis of MHE, namely the cellular origin of osteochondromas and the signaling aberration underlying osteochondromagenesis. To address the former question, we generated a MHE mouse model based on Fsp1-Cre–mediated conditional KO, in which Ext1 was ablated in progenitor cells in the perichondrium but not in chondrocytes in the growth plate. We show that Fsp1-Cre;Ext1flox/flox mice (called Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice, hereafter) developed multiple osteochondromas, demonstrating that osteochondromas can be derived from Ext1-deficient progenitor cells in the perichondrium. As for the signaling aberration underlying osteochondromagenesis, we show that BMP signaling is upregulated in the perichondrium of both Col2a1-Ext1CKO and Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice, and that Ext1-deficient perichondrial progenitor cells exhibit enhanced chondrogenic differentiation and BMP signaling in vitro. Furthermore, pharmacological intervention of BMP signaling using the small molecule BMP inhibitor LDN-193189 suppresses the development of osteochondromas and bone deformity in these two MHE models. Overall, our results demonstrate that aberrant perichondrial BMP signaling in progenitor cells in the perichondrium mediates osteochondromagenesis in mice, and they suggest a potential therapeutic and/or preventive role for BMP inhibitors in the treatment of MHE.
Results
Aberrant differentiation of perichondrial cells in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice.
We have previously shown that Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice develop macroscopic osteochondromas in various bones by P28 (10). To identify earlier changes associated with osteochondroma development, we histologically examined the wrist joint area of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice at P10, where osteochondromas develop at 100% penetrance by P28 (10). Safranin O staining revealed the presence of abnormal cell clusters in the groove of Ranvier, a specialized area of the perichondrium circumferencing the epiphyseal growth plate (Figure 1A). No such abnormalities were observed in the groove of Ranvier of control mice (Figure 1A). Similar abnormal cell clusters were also observed in the perichondrium of rib bones of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice (Figure 1B). These observations suggest that osteochondromas are derived from aberrant differentiation of cells in the perichondrium, as postulated previously (12–14).
The groove of Ranvier is thought to serve as a stem cell niche for generating cells of chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages (15). We confirmed that cells in the groove of Ranvier express mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) markers, CD44, Sca-1, and Stro-1 (Figure 1C). The presence of high levels of HS in the perichondrium has been suggested by a previous in situ hybridization study, which showed robust expression of mRNA encoding the syndecan-3 core protein in the perichondrium of developing chick bones (16). To directly examine the presence of HS in the perichondrium, we used two monoclonal antibodies (10E4 and 3G10; ref. 17) that recognize different carbohydrate epitopes in HS chains. The groove of Ranvier is strongly immunoreactive to both antibodies (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.90049DS1). Specificity of this result was further confirmed by using heparitinase treatment of tissue sections (Supplemental Figure 1). HS immunoreactivity is detectable in growth plate cartilage, but its intensity is much weaker than that of the perichondrium (Figure 1C). These results demonstrate that, in the epiphyseal area of developing long bones, HS is predominantly expressed in the perichondrium, including the groove of Ranvier, suggesting its possible functional involvement in the proliferation and/or differentiation of progenitor cells.
To determine the differentiation state of the abnormal cell clusters, we performed double immunostaining with antibodies to Sox9 (a marker of early chondrogenic cells) and type II collagen (a marker for differentiated chondrocytes). In control mice, the distribution of Sox9-expressing cells (green) was restricted to growth plate cartilage; no Sox9-expressing cells were detected in the perichondrium (Figure 1D). In contrast, in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice, cells ectopically expressing Sox9 were detected in the perichondrium, coinciding with the groove of Ranvier (Figure 1D, white arrowheads). Similarly, ectopic Sox9–expressing cells were detected in the perichondrium of rib bones in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice (Figure 1D). Some of these ectopic Sox9–expressing cells elaborate pericellular coats of type II collagen (Figure 1D, open arrowhead). To further characterize the property of these cells, sections through Sox9-expressing cell clusters were analyzed for MSC marker expression. Immunostaining with anti-CD44 antibody revealed that these cells express CD44, albeit at lower levels than surrounding normal perichondrial cells (Figure 1E), suggesting that they arise from progenitor cells. Together, these results suggest that loss of HS causes premature chondrogenic differentiation of progenitor cells in the perichondrium.
Perichondrium-targeted conditional Ext1 deletion leads to osteochondroma formation.
The identification of abnormal cell clusters in the groove of Ranvier of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice suggests that osteochondromas are derived from progenitor cells residing in the perichondrium. Although Col2a1 is generally considered to be a marker for differentiated chondrocytes, Col2a1-Cre has been shown to be active in the perichondrium (8, 18, 19). Therefore, the development of osteochondromas in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice does not rule out the possibility that they are derived from cells in the perichondrium. To obtain genetic evidence for this possibility, we generated perichondrium-targeted Ext1–conditional KO mice using Fsp1-Cre (20). Fsp1 is expressed by precursor cells of the mesenchymal lineage but not by terminally differentiated mesenchymal cell types, such as chondrocytes or osteocytes (21–23), and its expression in developing bone is restricted to the perichondrium and periosteum (24). The Fsp1-Cre transgene has previously been used to ablate Ptpn11 in the perichondrium (25). The recombination pattern of Fsp1-Cre, visualized using the Rosa26-lacZ (R26R) reporter, demonstrates that its activity in developing bone is restricted to the perichondrium and periosteum (Supplemental Figure 2).
Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice were born alive without any gross abnormalities, and the overall skeletal development of these mice was indistinguishable from control littermates. At 4 weeks, bony protrusions were identified in limb, rib, and vertebral bones (Figure 2, A and B). Histologically, these protrusions consist of bony tuberosities with a cartilage cap (Figure 2C), consistent with the histological features of osteochondromas in human MHE. These mice also displayed rib-cage deformity and swelling of the chondro-osseous junction, phenotypes also observed in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice (10). Supplemental Table 1 summarizes the occurrence of osteochondromas in Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice at 4 weeks of age in comparison with Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice (10). The penetrance of the phenotypes is largely comparable between the two models, except for the higher occurrence of osteochondromas in the distal humerus, proximal radius, and distal femur and the lack of scoliosis in the Fsp1-Ext1CKO model. Additionally, unlike Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice, which exhibit enhanced osteoclastogenesis (26), there was no increase in the number of osteoclasts in Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice (Supplemental Figure 3). Overall, these results demonstrate that loss of Ext1 restricted to perichondrial progenitor cells is sufficient to induce MHE-like osteochondromagenesis in various bones.
Ext1-deficient perichondrium-derived progenitor cells exhibit enhanced chondrogenic differentiation and BMP signaling.
While HS plays a role in multiple signaling pathways, the demonstration that the abnormal cell clusters in the perichondrium express Sox9 and Col2 suggests that the pathway primarily affected in the course of osteochondromagenesis is one involved in chondrogenic differentiation. One such candidates is the BMP pathway, which is noteworthy in that several lines of evidence suggest a functional link between BMP signaling and HS in the context of endochondral ossification. For example, conditional inactivation of Ext1 in the limb bud mesenchyme primarily affects the BMP pathway by inducing the spatial expansion of BMP signaling (10). Both enzymatic removal of HS and chemical interference with HS enhance BMP bioactivity (12, 27, 28). Transgenic mice expressing a constitutively active form of the BMP receptor 1A develop abnormal chondrocytic protrusions in the perichondrium (29). Most intriguingly, patients of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), which is caused by a constitutively active mutation of the type I BMP receptor ALK2, have been reported to develop osteochondroma-like bone protrusions with a high frequency (30). These observations suggest that aberrant BMP signaling in HS-deficient cells in the perichondrium is a key molecular culprit underlying osteochondromagenesis.
To examine this possibility, we employed primary cultures of perichondrium-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells (31, 32) (designated as PDPCs). The isolated cells express MSC markers (Supplemental Figure 4A) and are capable of differentiation along the adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages (Supplemental Figure 4B). Ext1-deficient and control PDPCs were prepared by infecting Ext1flox/flox PDPCs with lentivirus-expressing Cre (lenti-Cre) or insertless lentivirus (lenti-control), respectively. Near complete ablation of Ext1 and HS expression in lenti-Cre–infected cells was confirmed by IHC with the 10E4 anti-HS antibody (Supplemental Figure 4C) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of Ext1 (Supplemental Figure 4D).
In pellet cultures, Ext1-deficient PDPCs showed chondrogenic differentiation in response to bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) that is much more robust than control PDPCs (Figure 3A, Safranin O). Ext1-deficient pellets also displayed enhanced hypertrophic differentiation, as revealed by immunostaining for type X collagen (Figure 3A, Col10). Analysis of the expression of chondrogenic markers, namely Sox9, Col2a1, and Aggrecan (Acan), also confirmed enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of Ext1-deficient PDPCs (Figure 3B). Moreover, Ext1-deficient PDPCs exhibited greater levels of phosphorylation of Smad1/5/8 proteins in response to BMP2 than did control PDPCs (Figure 3C). This enhancement in Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation is not due to elevated expression of the BMP2 receptor BMPR1A in Ext1-deficient PDPCs (Figure 3C). Together, these results show that loss of HS expression enhances BMP signaling and chondrogenic differentiation in perichondrial progenitor cells.
BMP signaling is upregulated in the perichondrium of Ext1 mutant mice.
To define the physiological significance of the above observations, we analyzed BMP signaling in the perichondrium of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice. Immunostaining with anti–phospho-Smad1/5/8 (pSmad1/5/8) antibody revealed an expansion of the distribution of pSmad1/5/8-positive cells in the perichondrium of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice. In controls, pSmad1/5/8-positive cells were localized mainly in the periosteal side of the perichondrium, while the cells in the groove of Ranvier were largely devoid of pSmad1/5/8 immunoreactivity (Figure 4, A and B). In Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice, the distribution of pSmad1/5/8-positive cells expanded toward the epiphyseal side, and cells in the groove of Ranvier, including the cells in abnormal cell clusters, were immunoreactive for pSmad1/5/8 (Figure 4, A and B). Enhancement in pSmad1/5/8 expression was also observed in the rib perichondrium (Figure 4C). We also examined whether BMP signaling is enhanced in cells composing osteochondromas. Both the cartilage cap of discrete osteochondromas (Figure 4D) and the overgrown growth plate cartilage (Figure 4E) were immunoreactive for pSmad1/5/8. These results corroborate the data from PDPC cultures and support the model that loss of HS expression confers enhanced BMP signaling in the perichondrium, leading to osteochondromagenesis.
Pharmacological inhibition of BMP signaling suppresses osteochondroma development in vivo.
To seek evidence for the causative role of BMP signaling in osteochondromagenesis, we examined whether pharmacological inhibition of BMP could suppress osteochondromagenesis. Among several small molecule BMP inhibitors, we chose the inhibitor of type I BMP receptors LDN-193189 for this study because its pharmacological properties in mice, including efficacy and toxicity, have been extensively characterized (33, 34). Also, LDN-193189 has been shown to be effective in reducing heterotopic ossification in a FOP mouse model (33).
Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice were injected i.p. with 10 mg/kg LDN-193189 daily for 3 weeks starting at P7. This dosage of LDN-193189 had no apparent detrimental effects either on the overall growth or the longitudinal growth of the radius of the treated animals (Figure 5B). Treatment with LDN-193189 resulted in a significant decrease in the number of osteochondromas in rib bones (Figure 5, A and B). In the wrist joint area, the ectopic growth of growth plate cartilage between the radius and ulna, which mimics the “kissing exostoses” seen in human MHE, was significantly reduced (Figure 5, A–C). Another obvious change was the reduction of swelling in the chondro-osseous junction in rib bones (Figure 5C). Histologically, the disorganization of the cartilage-perichondrium boundary was not entirely normalized but was much less prominent in LDN-193189–treated mice than controls (Figure 5C). To confirm that these changes are indeed induced by inhibition of BMP signaling, the level of pSmad1/5/8 expression was analyzed in the wrist joint area by IHC. pSmad1/5/8 immunoreactivity in the overgrown cartilage was decreased in LDN-193189–treated animals compared with control animals (Figure 5D), indicating that BMP signaling in the tissue that is relevant to osteochondromagenesis was attenuated by systemic administration of LDN-193189.
We further corroborated these findings by analyzing the Fsp1-Ext1CKO model. First, we confirmed by immunostaining with anti-pSmad1/5/8 antibody that BMP signaling is enhanced in the perichondrium of Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice, as in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice (Figure 6A). We then performed a second drug treatment study on Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice. Unlike Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice — many of which fail to thrive, dying after P40 — Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice can survive more than 1 year. Also, the onset of osteochondroma formation in Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice is delayed relative to that in Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice. Thus, Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice were treated for 4 weeks starting at P14, instead of for 3 weeks starting at P7 in the case of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice. As shown in Figure 6, B and C, treatment with LDN-193189 caused a pronounced decrease in the number of osteochondromas in rib bones. Unlike in the case of Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice, the growth of the radius in these mice was slightly inhibited, presumably due to the longer treatment duration, while there was no difference in the body weight. Overall, these results demonstrate that inhibition of BMP signaling with LDN-193189 suppresses osteochondromagenesis in both Col2a1-Ext1CKO and Fsp1-Ext1CKO MHE mouse models, suggesting the possible therapeutic use of small molecule BMP inhibitors in MHE.
Discussion
This study is aimed at understanding how loss of HS due to inactivation of Ext1 leads to the development of multiple osteochondromas. Two unsolved issues are addressed in this study, namely the cellular origin of osteochondromas and the signaling aberration underlying osteochondromagenesis.
The cellular origin of osteochondoma in MHE, either from chondrocytes in the growth plate or from cells in the perichondrium, has been debated for some time (35). One reason for this debate is the difficulty of interrogating the initial phases of osteochondromagenesis using human osteochondroma specimens. Previous data using explant cultures of mouse long bone anlagen support the perichondrial origin of osteochondromas (12). Our observation of the presence of abnormal cell clusters in the perichondrial groove of Ranvier (Figure 1) also suggests that osteochondromas arise from progenitor cells residing in the perichondrium. In this study, we used perichondrium-targeted conditional KO to obtain direct genetic evidence for the perichondrial origin of osteochondromas. As shown in Figure 2, Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice developed multiple osteochondromas, confirming that osteochondromas can be derived from Ext1 inactivation in perichondrial cells. To corroborate this genetic observation, we also show that the loss of HS expression in perichondrium-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells promotes chondrogenic differentiation of these cells. Together with the observation that HS is strongly expressed in the perichondrium (Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure 1), these findings indicate that HS plays a critical role in the fate decision of perichondrial progenitor cells and that dysregulation of this process is the key defect that leads to osteochondromagenesis in MHE. It should be noted that our finding does not necessarily rule out the possibility that osteochondromas can also be derived from differentiated chondrocytes (11). However, our present study reveals that the expression of HS is much lower in growth plate chondrocytes than in perichondrium (Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure 1), and neither of our mouse models (Col2a1-Ext1CKO and Fsp1-Ext1CKO) develops enchondroma-like intramedullary tumors. These observations argue against the chondrocytic origin of osteochondromas in these mouse models.
There have been several reports suggesting that aberrant BMP signaling plays a role in osteochondromagenesis (12, 27–30, 36). This present study provides multiple lines of functional evidence for this hypothesis. First, Ext1-deficient PDPCs exhibit upregulation of BMP signaling and enhanced BMP-induced chondrogenic differentiation (Figure 3). Second, upregulation of BMP signaling is observed in the perichondrium of both Col2a1-Ext1CKO and Fsp1-Ext1CKO MHE models (Figure 4). Finally, pharmacological inhibition of BMP signaling by LDN-193189 suppresses osteochondromagenesis in these two MHE models (Figure 5). The inability of LDN-193189 to fully normalize MHE phenotypes may be due to nonoptimal dosage or to involvement of other BMP receptors in addition to ALK2 in osteochondromagenesis. It is also possible that HS-binding growth factors/morphogens other than BMPs — such as FGFs, Indian hedgehog homolog (IHH), and VEGF — are involved in osteochondromagenesis. Still, the present results support the notion that dysregulation of BMP signaling in the absence of HS is the primary molecular culprit that induces osteochondromagenesis in MHE.
It has been reported that loss of HS enhances, rather than suppresses, BMP signaling (27, 28, 36). Our present study confirms this mode of action of HS on BMP signaling. This mode of action is distinct from that of HS in FGF signaling, in which HS proteoglycans (HSPGs) act as obligatory FGF coreceptors. As a result, loss of HS leads to suppression of FGF-mediated signaling. In contrast, BMP receptors do not require HSPG coreceptors for their interaction with BMPs. Endogenous HSPGs act as a sink to sequester BMPs and restrict their interaction with BMP receptors (28). Additionally, natural BMP antagonists, such as Noggin and Chordin, bind to and are potentiated by HS (37, 38). All these observations suggest a mechanistic model in which loss of HS leads to an increased availability of free BMPs for receptor activation, leading to enhanced BMP downstream signaling. Our results, both in vitro and in vivo, are consistent with this model.
The suppressive effect of LDN-193189 on osteochondroma formation not only provides functional evidence for the primary role of enhanced BMP signaling in osteochondromagenesis, but also suggests the possibility of pharmacological treatment for human MHE. In this study, we demonstrate the suppressive effect of LDN-193189 in two MHE models based on conditional KO of Ext1. While this paper was being revised, Sinha et al. (39) reported a similar effect of LDN-193189 on osteochondroma-like bone outgrowth that develops in another Ext1–conditional KO model (Acan-CreER;Ext1flox/flox). Thus, the molecular mechanism of osteochondromagenesis shown in this paper appears to be applicable to at least three MHE mouse models. An issue not explored in this study is the effect of LDN-193189 on nonconditional MHE mouse models, such as Ext1+/– and Ext2+/– heterozygotes. A problem with these models is that, while they recapitulate the human MHE genotypes, their osteochondroma phenotype is noticeably different from that of human MHE, in that osteochondromas develop only in rib bones with a low penetrance (6, 40). This feature makes nonconditional MHE models less practical for preclinical drug treatment studies.
Currently, surgical resection of existing osteochondromas is essentially the only treatment for MHE (41). Since MHE patients tend to develop dozens of osteochondromas during the course of the disease, the burden of multiple surgeries is significant, and there is an acute need for pharmacological treatment to alleviate the number or the extent of osteochondromas. While our study used LDN-193189, as it has been extensively characterized in the context of FOP, new BMP inhibitors are being developed. With further refinement of efficacy and selectivity, small molecule BMP inhibitors may be promising therapeutic and/or preventive agents for MHE.
Methods
Conditional KO mice.
The loxP-modified Ext1 allele (Ext1flox) was created as described previously (9). Mice carrying the Col2a1-CreERT (8) and Fsp1-Cre (20) transgenes were obtained from Susan Mackem (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA) and Eric Neilson (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA), respectively. Rosa26-lacZ (R26R) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice were generated as described previously (10). Perichondrium-targeted conditional Ext1-KO mice were generated by crossing the Ext1flox allele and the Fsp1-Cre transgene. Genotyping of the mice was performed by PCR as described previously (10). All mouse lines used in this study had been backcrossed to C57Bl/6J at least 10 generations.
Antibodies and regents.
The following antibodies were used in this study: mouse monoclonal anti–type II collagen (catalog ab54236), rat polyclonal anti-CD44 (catalog ab25340), and rat monoclonal anti–Sca-1 (catalog ab51317) from Abcam; rabbit polyclonal anti-pSmad1/5/8 (catalog 9511) and rabbit monoclonal anti-Sox9 (catalog 82630) from Cell Signaling Technology; rabbit polyclonal anti-Smad1/5/8 (catalog sc-6031-R) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; mouse monoclonal anti-HS (clones 10E4 and 3G10) from Seikagaku America; mouse monoclonal anti–Stro-1 (catalog 39-8401) from Invitrogen; rabbit polyclonal anti–type X collagen (catalog RDI-COLL10abr) from Fitzgerald; Alexa 488–labelled goat anti–rabbit IgG (catalog A-11034) and Alexa 594–labeled goat anti–mouse IgG (catalog A-11005) from Invitrogen; and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti–rabbit and goat anti–mouse IgG (H+L) from Bio-Rad. TO-PRO-3 and DAPI were purchased from Invitrogen.
Histology and IHC.
Tissue specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS, decalcified in EDTA, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 5 μm in thickness. For Safranin O/Fast Green staining, deparaffinized, rehydrated sections were stained in 0.02% aqueous Fast Green (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by a rinse in 1% acetic acid and 0.1% aqueous Safranin O (Sigma-Aldrich). For tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, deparaffinized, rehydrated sections were stained with TRAP staining solution (Sigma-Aldrich). For frozen-section preparation, bones were harvested and immediately frozen in SCEM compound (Section-Lab). The cut surface was covered with an adhesive film (Cryofilm type IIC9, Section-Lab) and sections (5 μm) were prepared with a microtome (Leica CM3050 S, Leica Microsystems) according to a method described previously (42, 43). For Safranin O/Fast Green staining, frozen sections were postfixed in 4% PFA in PBS and stained in 0.02% aqueous Fast Green, followed by a rinse in 1% acetic acid and 0.1% aqueous Safranin O. For immunostaining, frozen sections (5 μm) were postfixed in 4% PFA and blocked with 5% goat serum/0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS. Sections were incubated overnight at 4˚C with primary antibodies, followed by detection with secondary antibodies conjugated to the indicated fluorophores at concentrations recommended by manufacturers. Nuclei counterstaining was performed by TO-PRO-3 or DAPI. For immunostaining with mouse monoclonal antibodies, sections were additionally incubated with an unconjugated affinity purified F(ab) fragment goat anti–mouse IgG (H+L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch) overnight at 4˚C before proceeding to the incubation with primary antibodies. For staining with the anti–HS 10E4 antibody, sections were pretreated with chondroitinase ABC (2 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 hours at 37˚C. Whole-skeleton X-gal staining was performed as described previously (10).
Analysis of the skeleton.
For whole-mount analysis of skeletons, mice were eviscerated and fixed in 95% ethanol overnight. The preparations were stained with alcian blue for 1–3 days, rinsed in 95% ethanol, and incubated in 2% KOH for 24–48 hours. Then they were stained with alizarin red S for 1–3 days. Stained preparations were cleaned in 20% glycerol/1% KOH for 5–14 days and transferred to 50% glycerol/50% ethanol for photography and storage. In some cases, skeletal preparations were stained without alizarin red S staining.
Isolation and characterization of PDPCs.
Isolation of perichondrial progenitor cells was performed according to the method described for isolation of MSCs from the perichondrium of long bones (31). The entire rib cage was dissected from Ext1flox/flox mice at P1, and individual rib bones were cleaned free of muscles and connective tissues. The cleaned bones were incubated in 2 mg/ml collagenase (type 2, Worthington) in DMEM for 30 minutes at 37°C, and then perichondrium was peeled off and triturated to dissociate cells. Dissociated cells were plated in DMEM containing 10% FBS (Invitrogen), and adhesive cells were cultured for 2 weeks in the presence of 5 ng/ml FGF2 (BioVision) and 5 U/ml heparin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were then characterized by flow cytometry. For flow cytometry, cells were labeled using a Mouse Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Marker Panel (Abcam, catalog ab93759) and analyzed on a FACSCanto flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometric data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
Lentiviral transduction of cells.
Cre-IRES-Puro lentivirus particles were produced from the Cre-IRES-Puro plasmid (Addgene; plasmid 30205). Control IRES-Puro lentivirus particles were produced from a plasmid, in which the NLS-Cre sequence was deleted from Cre-IRES-Puro. Lentiviral particles were produced in the Viral Core facility at Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute. For transduction, 2 × 106 PDPCs were seeded in a 10-cm dish with lentiviral particles at a multiplicity of infection of 5. After 24 hours, cells were fed with fresh medium and cultured for another 24 hours. Then, puromycin (10 μg/ml) was added to cultures, and cells were selected for 2 days. Cells were washed and fed with fresh medium for another 2 days before used in experiments.
Pellet cultures.
PDPCs were detached by enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer (Gibco) and suspended in complete chondrogenic differentiating media consisting of DMEM (high glucose), 100 nM dexamethasone, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 100 μg/ml sodium pyruvate, 40 μg/ml l-proline, and 1× ITS+ (Sigma-Aldrich). Aliquots of 2.0 × 105 cells in 1 ml of defined media were spun down at 150 g for 5 minutes. Pellets were incubated with recombinant human BMP2 (Affymetrix, eBioscience) at 37˚C for 14 days. For histological analyses, pellets were fixed in 4% PFA/0.3% sucrose in PBS, and then immersed in 30% sucrose. Fixed pellets were mounted in OCT embedding compound and frozen at –80˚C until use.
Immunoblotting.
Cells were lysed in ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM leupeptin, 0.1 μg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 g/ml l-1 chlor-3-(4-tosylamido)-4 phenyl-2-butanon (TPCK), 10 μg/ml l-1 chlor-3-(4-tosylamido)-7-amino-2-heptanon-hydrochloride (TLCK), 10 μg/ml aprotinin, and 50 μg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Sigma-Aldrich). Lysed cells were incubated on ice for 30 minutes and then centrifuged at 20,000 g for 20 minutes at 4˚C to isolate cell lysate. Lysate (10 μg) was subjected to SDS-PAGE on 8%–16% Tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen), followed by electroblotting onto an Immobilon PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore). The ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to detect signals.
Differentiation assays.
Osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation of PDPCs were induced by culturing in the following differentiation-inducing media: Osteogenesis, 10% FCS/DMEM containing 1 nM dexamethasone, 20 μM β-glycerolphosphate, and 50 mM ascorbic acid-2-phosphate; Adipogenesis, 10% FCS/DMEM containing 0.5 μM dexamethasone, 0.5 μM isobutyl-methylxanthine, and 50 μM indomethacin; Chondrogenesis, DMEM containing 100 nM dexamethasone, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 100 μg/ml sodium pyruvate, 40 μg/ml l-proline, 1× ITS+, and 10 ng/ml recombinant mouse TGF-β1 (Affymetrix, eBioscience). After culturing for respective periods, levels of osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation were evaluated by staining cultures with alizarin red S, oil red O, and alcian blue, respectively.
qPCR.
Total RNA was extracted from cell monolayers or pellets using the RNeasy kit with DNase (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript VILO Master Mix (Invitrogen), and qPCR was performed by using the FAST SYBR Green qPCR kit (Invitrogen) and primers shown in Supplemental Table 2. All values were normalized to Gapdh levels, and qPCR data were expressed as fold increases compared with controls. Specificity was tested by melting-curve analysis.
Drug treatment.
Col2a1-Ext1CKO mice (10 mice per group) were treated by i.p. injection of LDN-193189 (Sigma-Aldrich) (10 mg/kg body weight in distilled water) or vehicle (distilled water) daily, beginning at 7 days of age, for 3 weeks. At the end of drug treatment, animals were sacrificed and processed to prepare whole-mount skeletal preparation. Assessment of the skeletal gross abnormalities and osteochondromagenesis were performed in the whole-mount skeletal preparations by an observer blinded to the type of treatment. The number of osteochondromas was determined by counting discrete osteochondromas in all rib bones of a whole-mount skeletal preparation under a stereoscopic microscope. The longitudinal length of overgrown cartilage between the radius and ulna, as well as the length of the radius, was measured with ImageJ software on the microphotographs taken by a CCD camera. For Fsp1-Ext1CKO mice (8 mice per group), LDN-193189 (10 mg/kg body weight in distilled water) or vehicle (distilled water) were i.p. injected daily beginning at 14 days of age for 4 weeks. At the end of drug treatment, animals were sacrificed and their skeletal preparations examined as described above.
Statistics.
No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 5. Student’s two-sided t test and two-way ANOVA were used under the assumption of normal distribution and observance of similar variance. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Bonferroni post hoc analysis was performed where applicable. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. For all of these experiments, between-group variances were similar and data were symmetrically distributed. Data shown are representative images; each analysis was performed on at least 3 mice per genotype. Immunostaining was performed at least in triplicate. For other experiments, the numbers of biological replicates, animals, or cells are indicated in the text. There was no randomized allocation during the experiments and outcome assessment.
Study approval.
All procedures were performed in accordance with NIH Guide for the care and use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2011) and approved by the IACUC of the Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute.
Author contributions
YY designed research; TI, SN, KM, and FI performed research; TI, FI, and YY analyzed data; TI and YY wrote the paper.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants R01AR055670 and R01AR062692 (to YY). TI was the recipient of a Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. SN was the recipient of Uehara Memorial Foundation Fellowship. We thank Susan Mackem and Eric Neilson for providing Col2a1-CreERT and Fsp1-Cre mice, respectively; Daniel Legault-Coutu (Helmholtz Zentrum München) for providing a protocol and help for culturing perichondrial progenitor cells; and the MHE Research Foundation for support and encouragement.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: YY is a recipient of a research grant from Clementia Pharmaceuticals.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2017;2(15):e90049. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.90049.
Contributor Information
Toshihiro Inubushi, Email: tinubushi@sanfordburnham.org.
Satoshi Nozawa, Email: noza618@gmail.com.
Kazu Matsumoto, Email: mkazuu@gifu-u.ac.jp.
Fumitoshi Irie, Email: firie@sbpdiscovery.org.
Yu Yamaguchi, Email: yyamaguchi@sbpdiscovery.org.
References
- 1.Bishop JR, Schuksz M, Esko JD. Heparan sulphate proteoglycans fine-tune mammalian physiology. Nature. 2007;446(7139):1030–1037. doi: 10.1038/nature05817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schmale GA, Conrad EU, Raskind WH. The natural history of hereditary multiple exostoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(7):986–992. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199407000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McCormick C, et al. The putative tumour suppressor EXT1 alters the expression of cell-surface heparan sulfate. Nat Genet. 1998;19(2):158–161. doi: 10.1038/514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lind T, Tufaro F, McCormick C, Lindahl U, Lidholt K. The putative tumor suppressors EXT1 and EXT2 are glycosyltransferases required for the biosynthesis of heparan sulfate. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(41):26265–26268. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Senay C, et al. The EXT1/EXT2 tumor suppressors: catalytic activities and role in heparan sulfate biosynthesis. EMBO Rep. 2000;1(3):282–286. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stickens D, Zak BM, Rougier N, Esko JD, Werb Z. Mice deficient in Ext2 lack heparan sulfate and develop exostoses. Development. 2005;132(22):5055–5068. doi: 10.1242/dev.02088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stieber JR, Dormans JP. Manifestations of hereditary multiple exostoses. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(2):110–120. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200503000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nakamura E, Nguyen MT, Mackem S. Kinetics of tamoxifen-regulated Cre activity in mice using a cartilage-specific CreER(T) to assay temporal activity windows along the proximodistal limb skeleton. Dev Dyn. 2006;235(9):2603–2612. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Inatani M, Irie F, Plump AS, Tessier-Lavigne M, Yamaguchi Y. Mammalian brain morphogenesis and midline axon guidance require heparan sulfate. Science. 2003;302(5647):1044–1046. doi: 10.1126/science.1090497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Matsumoto K, Irie F, Mackem S, Yamaguchi Y. A mouse model of chondrocyte-specific somatic mutation reveals a role for Ext1 loss of heterozygosity in multiple hereditary exostoses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(24):10932–10937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914642107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones KB, et al. A mouse model of osteochondromagenesis from clonal inactivation of Ext1 in chondrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(5):2054–2059. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910875107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huegel J, et al. Perichondrium phenotype and border function are regulated by Ext1 and heparan sulfate in developing long bones: a mechanism likely deranged in Hereditary Multiple Exostoses. Dev Biol. 2013;377(1):100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zak BM, et al. Compound heterozygous loss of Ext1 and Ext2 is sufficient for formation of multiple exostoses in mouse ribs and long bones. Bone. 2011;48(5):979–987. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mansoor A, Beals RK. Multiple exostosis: a short study of abnormalities near the growth plate. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16(5):363–365. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32823ed01a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karlsson C, Thornemo M, Henriksson HB, Lindahl A. Identification of a stem cell niche in the zone of Ranvier within the knee joint. J Anat. 2009;215(3):355–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01115.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koyama E, Shimazu A, Leatherman JL, Golden EB, Nah HD, Pacifici M. Expression of syndecan-3 and tenascin-C: possible involvement in periosteum development. J Orthop Res. 1996;14(3):403–412. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100140310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.David G, Bai XM, Van der Schueren B, Cassiman JJ, Van den Berghe H. Developmental changes in heparan sulfate expression: in situ detection with mAbs. J Cell Biol. 1992;119(4):961–975. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.4.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Long F, Chung UI, Ohba S, McMahon J, Kronenberg HM, McMahon AP. Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development. 2004;131(6):1309–1318. doi: 10.1242/dev.01006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ono N, Ono W, Nagasawa T, Kronenberg HM. A subset of chondrogenic cells provides early mesenchymal progenitors in growing bones. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(12):1157–1167. doi: 10.1038/ncb3067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bhowmick NA, et al. TGF-beta signaling in fibroblasts modulates the oncogenic potential of adjacent epithelia. Science. 2004;303(5659):848–851. doi: 10.1126/science.1090922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Strutz F, et al. Identification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1. J Cell Biol. 1995;130(2):393–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ebralidze A, et al. Isolation and characterization of a gene specifically expressed in different metastatic cells and whose deduced gene product has a high degree of homology to a Ca2+-binding protein family. Genes Dev. 1989;3(7):1086–1093. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.7.1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Duarte WR, et al. S100A4: a novel negative regulator of mineralization and osteoblast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(3):493–501. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.3.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Klingelhöfer J, Ambartsumian NS, Lukanidin EM. Expression of the metastasis-associated mts1 gene during mouse development. Dev Dyn. 1997;210(2):87–95. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199710)210:2<87::AID-AJA2>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bowen ME, Ayturk UM, Kurek KC, Yang W, Warman ML. SHP2 regulates chondrocyte terminal differentiation, growth plate architecture and skeletal cell fates. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sgariglia F, et al. Epiphyseal abnormalities, trabecular bone loss and articular chondrocyte hypertrophy develop in the long bones of postnatal Ext1-deficient mice. Bone. 2013;57(1):220–231. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jiao X, Billings PC, O’Connell MP, Kaplan FS, Shore EM, Glaser DL. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) modulate BMP2 osteogenic bioactivity in C2C12 cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(2):1080–1086. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513414200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fisher MC, Li Y, Seghatoleslami MR, Dealy CN, Kosher RA. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans including syndecan-3 modulate BMP activity during limb cartilage differentiation. Matrix Biol. 2006;25(1):27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2005.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kobayashi T, Lyons KM, McMahon AP, Kronenberg HM. BMP signaling stimulates cellular differentiation at multiple steps during cartilage development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(50):18023–18027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503617102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Deirmengian GK, Hebela NM, O’Connell M, Glaser DL, Shore EM, Kaplan FS. Proximal tibial osteochondromas in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):366–374. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Coutu DL, François M, Galipeau J. Inhibition of cellular senescence by developmentally regulated FGF receptors in mesenchymal stem cells. Blood. 2011;117(25):6801–6812. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-321539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Arai F, Ohneda O, Miyamoto T, Zhang XQ, Suda T. Mesenchymal stem cells in perichondrium express activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule and participate in bone marrow formation. J Exp Med. 2002;195(12):1549–1563. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yu PB, et al. BMP type I receptor inhibition reduces heterotopic [corrected] ossification. Nat Med. 2008;14(12):1363–1369. doi: 10.1038/nm.1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Boergermann JH, Kopf J, Yu PB, Knaus P. Dorsomorphin and LDN-193189 inhibit BMP-mediated Smad, p38 and Akt signalling in C2C12 cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42(11):1802–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jochmann K, Bachvarova V, Vortkamp A. Heparan sulfate as a regulator of endochondral ossification and osteochondroma development. Matrix Biol. 2014;34:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2013.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Matsumoto Y, Matsumoto K, Irie F, Fukushi J, Stallcup WB, Yamaguchi Y. Conditional ablation of the heparan sulfate-synthesizing enzyme Ext1 leads to dysregulation of bone morphogenic protein signaling and severe skeletal defects. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(25):19227–19234. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.105338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Paine-Saunders S, Viviano BL, Economides AN, Saunders S. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans retain Noggin at the cell surface: a potential mechanism for shaping bone morphogenetic protein gradients. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(3):2089–2096. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109151200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jasuja R, Allen BL, Pappano WN, Rapraeger AC, Greenspan DS. Cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans potentiate chordin antagonism of bone morphogenetic protein signaling and are necessary for cellular uptake of chordin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(49):51289–51297. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408129200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sinha S, et al. Unsuspected osteochondroma-like outgrowths in the cranial base of Hereditary Multiple Exostoses patients and modeling and treatment with a BMP antagonist in mice. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(4):e1006742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hilton MJ, Gutiérrez L, Martinez DA, Wells DE. EXT1 regulates chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation during endochondral bone development. Bone. 2005;36(3):379–386. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kitsoulis P, et al. Osteochondromas: review of the clinical, radiological and pathological features. In Vivo. 2008;22(5):633–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kawamoto T, Shimizu M. A method for preparing 2- to 50-micron-thick fresh-frozen sections of large samples and undecalcified hard tissues. Histochem Cell Biol. 2000;113(5):331–339. doi: 10.1007/s004180000149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arima Y, et al. Regional neural activation defines a gateway for autoreactive T cells to cross the blood-brain barrier. Cell. 2012;148(3):447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.