Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2017 Jun 15;281:246–252. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.06.009

High-Resolution Hyperpolarized In Vivo Metabolic 13C Spectroscopy at Low Magnetic Field (48.7 mT) Following Murine Tail-Vein Injection

Aaron M Coffey a,b,*, Matthew A Feldman a,b, Roman V Shchepin a,b, Danila A Barskiy a,b, Milton L Truong a,b, Wellington Pham a,b,c,d, Eduard Y Chekmenev a,b,c,d,e,*
PMCID: PMC5544012  NIHMSID: NIHMS889937  PMID: 28651245

Abstract

High-resolution 13C NMR spectroscopy of hyperpolarized succinate-1-13C is reported in vitro and in vivo using a clinical-scale, biplanar (80 cm-gap) 48.7 mT permanent magnet with a high homogeneity magnetic field. Non-localized 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 0.52 MHz resonance frequency over the torso of a tumor-bearing mouse every 2 seconds. Hyperpolarized 13C NMR signals with linewidths of ~3 Hz (corresponding to ~6 ppm) were recorded in vitro (2 mL in a syringe) and in vivo (over a mouse torso). Comparison of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) for 13C NMR spectra acquired at 48.7 mT and at 4.7 T in a small-animal MRI scanner demonstrates a factor of ~12 improvement for the 13C resonance linewidth attainable at 48.7 mT compared to that at 4.7 T in vitro. 13C hyperpolarized succinate-1-13C resonance linewidths in vivo are at least one order of magnitude narrower at 48.7 mT compared to those observed in high-field (≥ 3 T) studies employing HP contrast agents. The demonstrated high-resolution 13C in vivo spectroscopy could be useful for high-sensitivity spectroscopic studies involving monitoring HP agent uptake or detecting metabolism using HP contrast agents with sufficiently large 13C chemical shift differences.

Keywords: NMR, hyperpolarization, parahydrogen, 13C, in vivo spectroscopy

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms889937u1.jpg

1. Introduction

The emergence of several hyperpolarization techniques enhancing the detected signal from nuclear spins by orders of magnitude [15] have led to a wealth of opportunities to pursue in the developing arena of high sensitivity magnetic resonance research. In non-hyperpolarized methods, the magnetic field strength of the detection magnet serves to polarize the nuclear spins (usually protons) with polarization levels of ≤3.5 ppm/Tesla constraining the detection limit [6] to large ensembles of nuclear spins (conventionally bulk water in clinical MR applications). Hyperpolarization techniques, however, produce spin polarization independent of the readout magnet, and therefore, they provide freedom to select a magnetic field strength, and correspondingly a detection frequency, optimized to the nucleus observed [7, 8] and the dielectric properties of the sample [911]. Of particular interest is the quickly developing frontier of low-field magnetic resonance (NMR) and imaging (MRI) [1214], due to its ability to strongly complement the study of hyperpolarized (HP) nuclei, and its potential for application in areas of study including heteronuclear spin-labeled metabolites [15, 16] or other contrast agents [1722] at low concentrations.

Key advantages have given rise to the desirability of pursuing low-field NMR and MRI. First, detection at low static magnetic field B0 is known to yield far less vulnerability to magnetic susceptibility-induced field gradient artifacts in imaging, including those surrounding metallic implants [23] or interfaces between materials such as airways and tissues as occur in the lungs, inner ear, and nasal passages, thus significantly reducing the advanced shimming hardware requirements [24]. Second, the specific absorption rate (SAR) of energy deposited in the sample/subject during application of radiofrequency (RF) pulses scales B02. Consequently, lowering the field strength confers the benefit of reducing SAR to potentially negligible levels [11], which not only alleviates patient safety concerns, but can also lead to design and implementation of faster pulse sequences by permitting use of RF pulses for echoes instead of gradient echoes [11]. Third, through utilizing long-lived spin states (LLSS) [2536] or taking advantage of reduced contributions from chemical shift anisotropy particularly below 0.1 T [37], hyperpolarized state lifetimes can significantly extend for protons and/or heteronuclei at low magnetic fields. Fourth, experimental validation of the theoretical equations for low-field NMR and MRI [12, 13] sensitivity for hyperpolarized states has favorably corroborated the weak frequency dependence of hyperpolarized state detection, where these theories indicate the potential for approaching or even exceeding the sensitivity of high-field NMR/MRI [12, 13]. Lastly, utilization of low-field magnets provides significantly less expensive purchasing and maintenance costs, which can pair favorably with lower-cost methods of producing hyperpolarized spin states such as Spin Exchange Optical Pumping (SEOP) primarily focused on 3He and 129Xe [1, 3842] or the high-throughput parahydrogen-based methods [5, 14, 43] including parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) [4446] and signal amplification by reversible exchange (SABRE) [4751].

In this communication, we demonstrate proof-of-principle high-resolution 13C NMR spectroscopic detection of HP succinate-1-13C-2,3-d2 (13C-SUX) at B0 = 47.5 mT in vitro as well as in vivo. Here, we take advantage of the significantly more homogeneous B0 field generated by a clinical-scale 80 cm-gap biplanar permanent magnet with ~13 ppm homogeneity over 40 cm diameter spherical volume (DSV) compared to a previously employed 8.9 cm-bore magnet with >20 ppm homogeneity over 4 cm [52]. Succinate was employed, because it finds potential application for cancer imaging [5356]. With the improved DSV size and B0 homogeneity, we report on in vivo high-resolution 13C NMR spectroscopy capable of resolving splittings ≥ 4 Hz arising due to 13C-1H heteronuclear spin-spin couplings within the HP 13C-SUX molecule (note that although 13C-2H two- and three-bond couplings are present in HP 13C-SUX (Figure 1), they are significantly weaker than the corresponding 13C-1H spin-spin couplings, and they are likely are manifested as line-broadening in the detected 13C NMR spectra). We compare 48.7 mT 13C in vitro and in vivo NMR spectra with those obtained at 4.7 T, and find at least one order of magnitude of 13C linewidth (in the units of Hz) improvement at low magnetic field compared to high magnetic field.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemistry of 13C-SUX hyperpolarization and NMR spectroscopy. (a) the conversion scheme of fumarate-1-13C-2,3-d2 to yield succinate-1-13C-2,3-d2 via the PHIP process. (b) and (e) 13C NMR spectroscopy of HP 13C-SUX in hollow plastic spheres (2.8 mL volume) at 4.7 T (best shim) and an HCA-filled syringe at 48.7 mT, respectively. (c) and (f) thermal Boltzmann polarization reference of 1 g sodium 1-13C-acetate in D2O at 4.7 T (single average) and 5 g sodium 1-13C-acetate in 15 mL D2O at 48.7 mT (16 averages), respectively. (d) T1 decay curve of HP 13C-SUX at 48.7 mT with simulated T1 of 88 ± 5 s. See additional details in the text.

Material and Methods

1.1. PHIP Hyperpolarizer

A PHIP hyperpolarizer used to prepare the 1-13C-succinate-d2 hyperpolarized contrast agent (HCA) was fully automated via open-source software and hardware and integrated with a dual-channel low-field NMR spectrometer (Kea2, Magritek, Wellington, New Zealand), with operations controlled by computer through a graphical user interface (GUI) [52]. The Helmholtz saddle configuration radiofrequency (RF) coils used for the RF polarization transfer sequence developed by Goldman and Johannesson [57] operate at the 1H and 13C resonances for B0 = 5.75 mT when capacitively tuned and matched to 50 Ω and enclose a high pressure plastic reactor with ~56 mL volume kept at temperatures between 50–60 ºC. Quality assurance of the produced agent before use is achieved via a small tipping angle RF pulse in order to establish the degree of polarization of the agent. The process of producing a dose of HCA takes less than a minute, and the routines for readying the system for the next dose, including cleaning, result in a total PHIP cycle time of less than 3 minutes. Full details of the PHIP polarizer instrumentation including schematics, software, and bill of materials are freely available elsewhere [52]. A home-built parahydrogen (p-H2) generator using a low-power cryocooler is used to produce continuously 90+% p-H2 from bulk hydrogen at flow rates up to 150 sscm and 25 bar pressure. A 1 L double-ended 316 SS sample cylinder with PTFE lining (316L-50DF4-500-T-PD, Swagelok) and brass Yor-Lok tube fittings (5272K291, McMaster-Carr) provides a gas reservoir for p-H2 collection between experiments (~0.4 L is consumed per production of HCA, coincidentally matching conveniently the PHIP cycle time).

1.2. PHIP Hyperpolarization of 1-13C-succinate-d2 (13C-SUX)

Preparation of aqueous Rh-based hydrogenation catalyst and fumaric acid-1-13C-d2 precursor used to produce HP succinate-1-13C-d2 (13C-SUX) followed previously the fully described previously procedure [52]. Briefly, precursor stock solution of fumaric acid-1-13C-d2 (Cambridge Isotopes, CDLM-6062-PK, 1-13C 99%, 2,3-D2 98%, 3.00 mmol, 0.357 g) is prepared in D2O, degassed, pH adjusted to 10.3, and mixed with the standard PHIP catalyst/ligand system of rhodium(I) catalyst, bis(norbornadiene) rhodium(I) tetrafluoroborate (0.200 g, 0.54 mmol, 45-0230, CAS 36620-11-8, Strem Chemicals, MA) and phosphorus ligand, disodium salt of 1,4-bis[(phenyl-3-propanesulfonate)phosphine]butane (717347, Sigma-Aldrich-Isotec, 0.360 g, 0.64 mmol). Following preparation, the catalyst is stored in a plastic bottle attached to the gas/liquid manifold of the PHIP hyperpolarizer and kept under slight overpressure (~2–5 psi gauge pressure) of ultra-high purity nitrogen or Argon (>99.999%, A-L Compressed Gases Inc., Nashville, TN) [52].

1.3. MRI magnet and RF coils

The upright biplanar permanent magnet clinical imaging system (Supporting Information (SI) and Figure 2) generates B0 field of 48.7 mT statically shimmed to ~13 ppm homogeneity over a 40 cm DSV (SIGWA 48.7 mT, Boston NMR, Boston, MA). The open-bore configuration achieves an 80 cm-gap between the planar XYZ gradient coil inserts mounted to the pole pieces. Heteronuclear NMR spectroscopic detection involving 13C and 15N on this system has been observed to approach ~1 Hz linewidths (determined as full width at half maximum or FWHM), when measuring NMR samples with μL volumes (e.g., samples in 5 mm NMR tubes). We note that this system is particularly well suited for the direct NMR measurement of J-couplings of hyperpolarized compounds given its low field strength and excellent field homogeneity [30]. While not utilized for shimming in the reported in vivo study, when used for MRI the XYZ planar gradient coil set is capable of reaching 20 mT/m in all axes with linearity within approximately ±6% across the full FOV of 40 cm. Further details of the imaging system (including the Tecmag Redstone console) are provided in the SI.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Experimental setup and in vivo 13C NMR spectroscopy. a) Parahydrogen at ~80% purity was prepared with a home-built parahydrogen generator and used to produce HP 13C-SUX from 13C-FUM in a home-built PHIP hyperpolarizer. b) Coinciding with the start of production of HP 13C-SUX in the PHIP hyperpolarizer, NMR acquisitions every 2 s were acquired with FA=18°, with (insets) showing a selected NMR spectrum from the series alongside the corresponding SVD de-noised spectrum (10 largest singular values). See additional details in the text and SI.

The RF coil built for use in this imaging system was designed to measure metabolic HP contrast agents in vivo in small animal studies involving mice. The solenoid coil was constructed to match the typical dimensions of the animal (17 mm diameter by up to 193 mm body length) to increase the coil filling factor and correspondingly the SNR. The coil had a quality factor of 55. The coil was tuned using 56H02 Johansen trimmer capacitors and ATC nonmagnetic ceramic capacitors to tune the resonant frequency to 13C resonance at 0.521 MHz or 1H resonance at 2.074 MHz and match the coil impedance to the 50 Ω coaxial transmission line impedance. All component values are provided in Tables S1 and S2 in the SI. The resonant circuit for 1H or 13C detection was comprised of a parallel LC resonator with a series capacitive matching element (see Figure S3 and S4, SI). The solenoid was constructed with 170 windings using 28 AWG gauge magnet wire with a measured inductance of 302 μH. The coil was enclosed in an RF shield constructed using square double-sided 1 oz. copper clad PCB materials (473–1007-ND, Digikey, Thief River Falls, MN) to form an enclosed cubic volume (1ft × 1ft × 1ft). This shielding provided an electric field suppression of 60+ dB. The coil was calibrated via a nutation sequence on the Redstone console using variable flip angle via pulse length calibration for fixed power, and the π/2 tip angle was determined to be 115 μs for 1H and 475 μs for 13C for <1 W of applied RF power. Further description of the RF probe is provided in the SI.

1.4. 13C HP NMR spectroscopy and 13C NMR spectroscopy using thermal polarization

Sodium 1-13C-acetate was used for Boltzmann thermal polarization analysis at 48.7 mT and 4.7 T for HP 13C-SUX spectroscopic comparison given ~97-fold field strength ratio for B0. HP 13C-SUX spectroscopy was performed by injecting HCA into a 2.8 mL hollow plastic sphere situated inside the corresponding RF coil at either 4.7 T (best 1H shim settings on the acetate phantom) or 48.7 mT (static magnet shim) followed by application of a small tipping angle hard RF pulse to observe the shimmed NMR resolution obtainable. For in vivo detection, a time series of NMR acquisitions to allow observation of HCA dynamics was commenced on the Redstone console at the start of the PHIP hyperpolarization sequence that produces a batch of HP 13C-SUX.

1.5. 13C spectroscopy in small rodents using HP 13C-SUX

The feasibility of in vivo 13C high-resolution detection of spin-spin couplings was tested in mice for HP 13C-SUX at the low magnetic field of 48.7 mT. Procedurally, the 4T1 mammary carcinoma cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%, v/v) and the culture dish was incubated in a 37°C, 5% CO2. Eight-to ten-week-old female nude mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory. All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Nude mice 6–8weeks of age (from Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) were implanted sub-cutaneously under anesthesia (isoflurane mixed with 2% oxygen) with 1.0×106 cells in the mammary fat pad using a 27-G needle. The progress of tumor growth was monitored via every-other-day measurement of tumor size and animal weight. When the tumors reached approximately 4mm in diameter, in vivo 13C spectroscopy study was performed.

In preparation for the NMR experiment, the mice were anesthetized using ketamine:xylazine (75mg/kg: 5mg/kg) via intraperitoneal injection. The anesthetic dose was designed to immobilize animals for approximately 60 minutes. After anesthetization, with the animal lying on a thin film carrier, a 28-gauge needle affixed to a catheter line was inserted into the lateral tail vein. The animal with catheter in place was then transported and placed inside the RF probe with the catheter line fitting through the RF shield. Prior to acquiring NMR spectroscopy or MRI imaging, animals were slowly injected over ~5 seconds timespan with ~0.2 mL of HP 13C-SUX via the catheter in performance of a tail-vein injection. After NMR spectroscopy, animals were retrieved from the scanner and placed back into a warm cage under constant observation until recovered from anesthesia.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. In vitro 13C NMR Spectroscopy at 4.7 T and 48.7 mT

13C NMR spectra of thermally polarized sodium acetate-1-13C (1 g dissolved in 2.8 mL D2O DSV) were recorded using a 4.7 T Varian preclinical MRI scanner (Figure 1c, 1 scan) and using a Tecmag Redstone console (Figure 1c, 16 scans) at 50 MHz and 0.52 MHz 13C resonance frequency, respectively. The high-field acquisition was performed using active shimming, while the low-field acquisition was performed without any additional magnet shimming. Acetate-1-13C moiety results in a characteristic 13C quartet appearance due to ~6.0 Hz 1H-13C two-bond spin-spin coupling. The quartet features are somewhat better resolved at 48.7 mT, Figure 1c vs. 1f.

13C spectroscopy of HP 13C-SUX was performed at 4.7 T using the same type of hollow plastic spherical container. The resulting spectrum (Figure 1b) shows one relatively broad line with FWHM ~ 36 Hz. 13C spectroscopy of HP 13C-SUX performed at 48.7 mT was conducted in a plastic syringe container. The spectrum (Figure 1e) shows a very well resolved multiplet pattern—a manifestation of complex network of two- and three-bond 13C-1H spin-spin couplings. The half-height line width (HHLW) was estimated to be < 3 Hz, and the two outer peaks of the splitting pattern (~3.9 Hz away) are well differentiated. The ~12-fold narrower linewidth (and consequently better resolution in units of Hz) obtained at 48.7 mT is possible due to the fact that susceptibility-induced field gradients which scale linearly with B0 are significantly reduced at 48.7 mT compared to 4.7 T (by the ratio of ~97 of the two field strengths). The chemical shift dispersion (in units of Hz) scales linearly with B0, and as a result, it is reduced by a factor of ~97 at 48.7 mT compared to that at 4.7 T. The effective ~12-fold line narrowing (due to reduced susceptibility-induced B0 field gradients) described above partially mitigates the above reduction in chemical shift dispersion, and the overall resolving power of 13C spectroscopy at 48.7 mT was approximately 8 times worse than that at 4.7 T (i.e., ~97:12).

Despite nominal reduction of spectral resolution, the significant in vivo 13C line narrowing at 48.7 mT vs. 4.7 T provides a certain advantage from the perspective of the detection sensitivity, or SNR. Because the sensitivity for HP detection can scale as B01/4 [12] or as B00.14 in the range of 10–500 kHz [58] depending on coil geometry and construction and the means of detection, which is a very weak field dependence, the significant reduction in FWHM is an important contributing factor to the overall detection sensitivity argument for low-field MR. In particular, this may translate into more sensitive LF MR detection schemes of HP contrast agents for some applications, which can take advantage of this significant narrowing of linewidth despite the commensurate reduction in the chemical shift dispersion, e.g. HP gas spectroscopy and imaging [5, 59].

2.2. In vitro 13C-SUX T1 in deoxygenated D2O

Previous measurement of 13C-SUX hyperpolarized lifetime in D2O at 47.5 mT yielded 75 ± 3 s in vitro [15]. At 48.7 mT, the lifetime of HP 13C-SUX in D2O was measured to be 88 ± 5 s in vitro according to the decay curve shown in Figure 1 and accounting for using a RF pulse with flip angle (FA) ~ 18°. This is in good agreement with previously reported value, and the minor discrepancy is likely caused by slight imprecision (< 1°) in calibrating the low-field RF pulse and small variations in the pH of the produced HCA, which is known to modulate 13C T1 of HP SUX significantly [53, 54, 60]. 13C chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) decreases significantly in units of Hz at 48.7 mT compared to that at ≥3 T. As a result, 13C CSA likely has a negligible contribution to the T1 relaxation of the 13C HP state at 48.7 mT, and dipole-dipole interactions likely represent the dominant T1 relaxation mechanism at such low magnetic fields.

2.3. In vivo 13C NMR Spectroscopy at 4.7 T and 48.7 mT

HP 13C-SUX was injected as a bolus dose in the tail vein of anesthetized tumor-bearing mouse, which was positioned inside a RF coil placed in the center of 48.7 mT magnet (Figure 1). Non-localized 13C NMR spectra were recorded via the NMR console commencing at the start of HCA production on the PHIP hyperpolarizer every 2 seconds using a small angle pulse for every RF excitation. The time window for recording NMR spectra of HP 13C-SUX was ~80 seconds (Figure 2b). We note that the entire dynamic 13C in vivo scan was effectively completed ~3 minutes after the beginning of contrast agent production in the PHIP hyperpolarizer. The 13C NMR signal increases at the very beginning due to HCA entering the body of the animal, and it decreases after reaching a maximum post-injection due to (i) T1 decay, (ii) RF pulse-associated losses, and (iii) possible metabolism. Despite the significant detection volume (whole mouse vs. a small syringe), the 13C NMR linewidth remained largely unchanged: ~3 Hz (in vivo, Figure 2b) vs. ~3 Hz (in vitro, see above). While this result is not surprising because the susceptibility-induced gradients are negligible, the demonstration of such high-spectral-resolution HP 13C low-field NMR spectroscopy in vivo has been performed for the first time to the best of our knowledge. Most in vivo preclinical experiments with 13C HP contrast agents are performed at 3 T and above, and 13C FWHM is typically ≥1 ppm corresponding to ≥30 Hz [55, 6165]. The HP 13C FWHM (in units of Hz) demonstrated here in vivo is at least an order of magnitude improvement compared to high-field in vivo studies of HP HCAs. Moreover, the FWHM of ~3 Hz (corresponding to ~6 ppm) is only a factor of ≤ 6 worse than that observed in high-field studies (i.e. ≥1 ppm) [55, 6165]. While the chemical shift resolution (in units of ppm) is certainly reduced at 48.7 mT, this reduction is offset through the gain in sensitivity via 13C line-narrowing, which represents an interesting trade-off between the detection sensitivity (i.e. SNR) and resolution.

2.4. Imaging and biomedical translation

Although HP NMR spectroscopy has been reported in the ZULF regime [37, 66, 67] including frequency-selective RF excitation [67], the use of conventional MRI frequency encoding in ZULF potentially is challenging due to the very low resonance frequency, and new MRI encoding techniques likely need to be developed. However, 13C (as well as 1H, 3He and 129Xe) MRI imaging can be performed at B0 > 6 mT (including ~48.7 mT, the field studied here) as has been demonstrated by us [15, 52, 6870] and others [8, 19, 20, 7175] previously using conventional MRI approaches. In particular, 13C frequency encoding can still be accomplished at ~0.5 MHz resonance frequency (f0) as employed here and using a RF coil with suitable quality factor Q and reasonable choice of spectral width (SW) to satisfy the imaging bandwidth condition of f0/Q ≫ SW [15]. The direct use of conventional encoding approaches is a clear translational advantage of LF MRI compared to the current status of ZULF due to the ready availability of commercial hardware and the wide range of already established pulse sequences.

The 13C NMR spectroscopy demonstrated here at 48.7 mT with ~6 ppm spectral resolution (~3 Hz FWHM) could be useful for in vivo 13C spectroscopic studies aiming to: (i) differentiate HP pyruvate-13C and its main metabolic product in tumors of HP lactate-1-13C, because their HP 13C resonances have a sufficient chemical shift difference of ~12 ppm [61, 62]; (ii) pH imaging via spectroscopic detection of HP 13C-bicarbonate and 13CO2, because their resonances are separated by ~35 ppm [76]; and (iii) potentially other injectable 13C HP contrast agents with sufficiently different chemical shifts of HP metabolites [65, 77].

3. Conclusion

High-resolution (FWHM ~ 3 Hz) 13C NMR spectroscopy of HP 13C-SUX has been successfully demonstrated at 0.521 MHz resonance frequency in vitro and in vivo using a homogeneous (13 ppm over 40 cm DSV) 80 cm-gap 48.7 mT magnet. Resolution of 13C line splittings of ~4 Hz were successfully observed in vivo. The in vivo 13C linewidth (FWHM) obtained at 48.7 mT was ~12 times better than that achieved with a 4.7 T small-animal MRI scanner using the same HCA. A significant gain in spectral linewidth for 13C low-field in vivo NMR spectroscopy is advantageous for improving the detection sensitivity of LF NMR. Potential biomedical applications can include monitoring HP 13C agent uptake as well as detecting metabolism of biomolecules with sufficiently different chemical shifts at such low fields including MRSI of HP pyruvate-1-13C/lactate-1-13C, HP bicarbonate-13C/13CO2 and others [7880].

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by NIH 1R21EB018014, 1R21EB020323, R01 CA160700 (W.P.), and 1F32EB021840, NSF CHE-1416268 and CHE-1416432, DOD CDMRP W81XWH-12-1-0159/BC112431, W81XWH-15-1-0271 and W81XWH-15-1-0272.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher’s web site.

References

  • 1.Nikolaou P, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. NMR Hyperpolarization Techniques for Biomedicine. Chem Eur J. 2015;21:3156–3166. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goodson BM. Nuclear magnetic resonance of laser-polarized noble gases in molecules, materials, and organisms. J Magn Reson. 2002;155:157–216. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blazina D, Duckett SB, Dunne JP, Godard C. Applications of the parahydrogen phenomenon in inorganic chemistry. Dalton Trans. 2004:2601–2609. doi: 10.1039/B409606A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kovtunov KV, Zhivonitko VV, Skovpin IV, Barskiy DA, Koptyug IV. Parahydrogen-induced polarization in heterogeneous catalytic processes. Top Curr Chem. 2013;338:123–180. doi: 10.1007/128_2012_371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Barskiy DA, Coffey AM, Nikolaou P, Mikhaylov DM, Goodson BM, Branca RT, Lu GJ, Shapiro MG, Telkki VV, Zhivonitko VV, Koptyug IV, Salnikov OG, Kovtunov KV, Bukhtiyarov VI, Rosen MS, Barlow MJ, Safavi S, Hall IP, Schröder L, Chekmenev EY. NMR Hyperpolarization Techniques of Gases. Chem Eur J. 2017;23:725–751. doi: 10.1002/chem.201603884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hill HDW, Richards RE. Limits of measurement in magnetic resonance. J Phys E: Sci Instrum. 1968;1:977–983. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parra-Robles J, Cross AR, Santyr GE. Theoretical signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution dependence on the magnetic field strength for hyperpolarized noble gas magnetic resonance imaging of human lungs. Med Phys. 2005;32:221–229. doi: 10.1118/1.1833593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dominguez-Viqueira W, Berger W, Parra-Robles J, Santyr GE. Litz Wire Radiofrequency Receive Coils for Hyperpolarized Noble Gas MR Imaging of Rodent Lungs at 73.5 mT. Concept Magnetic Res B. 2010;37B:75–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yamashita T, Oida T, Hamada S, Kobayashi T. Thermal noise calculation method for precise estimation of the signal-to-noise ratio of ultra-low-field MRI with an atomic magnetometer. J Magn Reson. 2012;215:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gilbert KM, Scholl TJ, Chronik BA. RF coil loading measurements between 1 and 50 MHz to guide field-cycled MRI system design. Concept Magnetic Res B. 2008;33B:177–191. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hayden ME, Bidinosti CP, Chapple EM. Specific absorption rates and signal-to-noise ratio limitations for MRI in very-low magnetic fields. Concept Magnetic Res A. 2012;40A:281–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Coffey AM, Truong ML, Chekmenev EY. Low-field MRI can be more sensitive than high-field MRI. J Magn Reson. 2013;237:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Suefke M, Liebisch A, Blumich B, Appelt S. External high-quality-factor resonator tunes up nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature Phys. 2015:767–771. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Blümich B. Virtual special issue: Magnetic resonance at low fields. J Magn Reson. 2017;274:145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coffey AM, Kovtunov KV, Barskiy D, Koptyug IV, Shchepin RV, Waddell KW, He P, Groome KA, Best QA, Shi F, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. High-resolution Low-field Molecular MR Imaging of Hyperpolarized Liquids. Anal Chem. 2014;86:9042–9049. doi: 10.1021/ac501638p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shchepin RV, Coffey AM, Waddell KW, Chekmenev EY. Parahydrogen Induced Polarization of 1-13C-Phospholactate-d2 for Biomedical Imaging with >30,000, 000-fold NMR Signal Enhancement in Water. Anal Chem. 2014;86:5601–5605. doi: 10.1021/ac500952z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kovtunov KV, Truong ML, Barskiy DA, Koptyug IV, Coffey AM, Waddell KW, Chekmenev EY. Long-lived Spin States for Low-field Hyperpolarized Gas MRI. Chem Eur J. 2014;20:14629–14632. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kovtunov KV, Truong ML, Barskiy DA, Salnikov OG, Bukhtiyarov VI, Coffey AM, Waddell KW, Koptyug IV, Chekmenev EY. Propane-d6 Heterogeneously Hyperpolarized by Parahydrogen. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118:28234–28243. doi: 10.1021/jp508719n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dominguez-Viqueira W, Parra-Robles J, Fox M, Handler WB, Chronik BA, Santyr GE. A variable field strength system for hyperpolarized noble gas MR imaging of rodent lungs. Concept Magnetic Res B. 2008;33B:124–137. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsai LL, Mair RW, Rosen MS, Patz S, Walsworth RL. An open-access, very-low-field MRI system for posture-dependent He-3 human lung imaging. J Magn Reson. 2008;193:274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hovener JB, Schwaderlapp N, Lickert T, Duckett SB, Mewis RE, Highton LAR, Kenny SM, Green GGR, Leibfritz D, Korvink JG, Hennig J, von Elverfeldt D. A hyperpolarized equilibrium for magnetic resonance. Nat Commun. 2013;4:5. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu Y, Chen CH, Wilson Z, Savukov I, Hilty C. Milli-tesla NMR and spectrophotometry of liquids hyperpolarized by dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization. J Magn Reson. 2016;270:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Venook RD, Matter NI, Ramachandran M, Ungersma SE, Gold GE, Giori NJ, Macovski A, Scott GC, Conolly SM. Prepolarized magnetic resonance imaging around metal orthopedic implants. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:177–186. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Juchem C, Nixon TW, McIntyre S, Rothman DL, Graaf RAd. Magnetic field modeling with a set of individual localized coils. J Magn Reson. 2010;204:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carravetta M, Levitt MH. Long-lived nuclear spin states in high-field solution NMR. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:6228–6229. doi: 10.1021/ja0490931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levitt MH. Singlet Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2012;63:89–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carravetta M, Johannessen OG, Levitt MH. Beyond the T1 Limit: Singlet Nuclear Spin States in Low Magnetic Fields. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;92:153003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.153003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pileio G, Carravetta M, Hughes E, Levitt MH. The Long-Lived Nuclear Singlet State of 15N-Nitrous Oxide in Solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:12582–12583. doi: 10.1021/ja803601d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pileio G, Carravetta M, Levitt MH. Storage of nuclear magnetization as long-lived singlet order in low magnetic field. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:17135–17139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010570107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barskiy DA, Salnikov OG, Romanov AS, Feldman MA, Coffey AM, Kovtunov KV, Koptyug IV, Chekmenev EY. NMR Spin-Lock Induced Crossing (SLIC) Dispersion and Long-Lived Spin States of Gaseous Propane at Low Magnetic Field (0.05 T) J Magn Reson. 2017;276:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Feng YS, Theis T, Liang XF, Wang Q, Zhou P, Warren WS. Storage of Hydrogen Spin Polarization in Long-Lived C-13(2) Singlet Order and Implications for Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:9632–9635. doi: 10.1021/ja404936p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Feng Y, Theis T, Wu TL, Claytor K, Warren WS. Long-lived polarization protected by symmetry. J Chem Phys. 2014;141:134307. doi: 10.1063/1.4896895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Theis T, Ortiz GX, Logan AWJ, Claytor KE, Feng Y, Huhn WP, Blum V, Malcolmson SJ, Chekmenev EY, Wang Q, Warren WS. Direct and cost-efficient hyperpolarization of long-lived nuclear spin states on universal 15N2-diazirine molecular tags. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1501438. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Emondts M, Ledbetter MP, Pustelny S, Theis T, Patton B, Blanchard JW, Butler MC, Budker D, Pines A. Long-Lived Heteronuclear Spin-Singlet States in Liquids at a Zero Magnetic field. Phys Rev Lett. 2014;112:077601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Turschmann P, Colell J, Theis T, Blumich B, Appelt S. Analysis of parahydrogen polarized spin system in low magnetic fields. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014;16:15411–15421. doi: 10.1039/c4cp01807a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vasos PR, Comment A, Sarkar R, Ahuja P, Jannin S, Ansermet JP, Konter JA, Hautle P, van den Brandt B, Bodenhausen G. Long-lived states to sustain hyperpolarized magnetization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:18469–18473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908123106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tayler MCD, Sjolander TF, Pines A, Budker D. Nuclear magnetic resonance at millitesla fields using a zero-field spectrometer. J Magn Reson. 2016;270:35–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nikolaou P, Coffey AM, Walkup LL, Gust BM, Whiting N, Newton H, Barcus S, Muradyan I, Dabaghyan M, Moroz GD, Rosen M, Patz S, Barlow MJ, Chekmenev EY, Goodson BM. Near-unity nuclear polarization with an ‘open-source’ 129Xe hyperpolarizer for NMR and MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:14150–14155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306586110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Driehuys B, Cates GD, Miron E, Sauer K, Walter DK, Happer W. High-volume production of laser-polarized Xe-129. Appl Phys Lett. 1996;69:1668–1670. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zook AL, Adhyaru BB, Bowers CR. High capacity production of > 65% spin polarized xenon-129 for NMR spectroscopy and imaging. J Magn Reson. 2002;159:175–182. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00030-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ruset IC, Ketel S, Hersman FW. Optical pumping system design for large production of hyperpolarized Xe-129. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:053002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.053002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nikolaou P, Coffey AM, Walkup LL, Gust BM, Whiting NR, Newton H, Muradyan I, Dabaghyan M, Ranta K, Moroz G, Patz S, Rosen MS, Barlow MJ, Chekmenev EY, Goodson BM. XeNA: An automated ‘open-source’ 129Xe hyperpolarizer for clinical use. Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;32:541–550. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Theis T, Ganssle P, Kervern G, Knappe S, Kitching J, Ledbetter MP, Budker D, Pines A. Parahydrogen-enhanced zero-field nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature Phys. 2011;7:571–575. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bowers CR, Weitekamp DP. Transformation of Symmetrization Order to Nuclear-Spin Magnetization by Chemical-Reaction and Nuclear-Magnetic-Resonance. Phys Rev Lett. 1986;57:2645–2648. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bowers CR, Weitekamp DP. Para-Hydrogen and Synthesis Allow Dramatically Enhanced Nuclear Alignment. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:5541–5542. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eisenschmid TC, Kirss RU, Deutsch PP, Hommeltoft SI, Eisenberg R, Bargon J, Lawler RG, Balch AL. Para Hydrogen Induced Polarization In Hydrogenation Reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:8089–8091. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Adams RW, Aguilar JA, Atkinson KD, Cowley MJ, Elliott PIP, Duckett SB, Green GGR, Khazal IG, Lopez-Serrano J, Williamson DC. Reversible Interactions with para-Hydrogen Enhance NMR Sensitivity by Polarization Transfer. Science. 2009;323:1708–1711. doi: 10.1126/science.1168877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cowley MJ, Adams RW, Atkinson KD, Cockett MCR, Duckett SB, Green GGR, Lohman JAB, Kerssebaum R, Kilgour D, Mewis RE. Iridium N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes as Efficient Catalysts for Magnetization Transfer from para-Hydrogen. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:6134–6137. doi: 10.1021/ja200299u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Theis T, Truong ML, Coffey AM, Shchepin RV, Waddell KW, Shi F, Goodson BM, Warren WS, Chekmenev EY. Microtesla SABRE Enables 10% Nitrogen-15 Nuclear Spin Polarization. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:1404–1407. doi: 10.1021/ja512242d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Truong ML, Theis T, Coffey AM, Shchepin RV, Waddell KW, Shi F, Goodson BM, Warren WS, Chekmenev EY. 15N Hyperpolarization By Reversible Exchange Using SABRE-SHEATH. J Phys Chem C. 2015;119:8786–8797. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barskiy DA, Shchepin RV, Coffey AM, Theis T, Warren WS, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. Over 20% 15N Hyperpolarization in Under One Minute for Metronidazole, an Antibiotic and Hypoxia Probe. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:8080–8083. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Coffey AM, Shchepin RV, Truong ML, Wilkens K, Pham W, Chekmenev EY. Open-Source Automated Parahydrogen Hyperpolarizer for Molecular Imaging Using 13C Metabolic Contrast Agents. Anal Chem. 2016;88:8279–8288. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bhattacharya P, Chekmenev EY, Perman WH, Harris KC, Lin AP, Norton VA, Tan CT, Ross BD, Weitekamp DP. Towards hyperpolarized 13C-succinate imaging of brain cancer. J Magn Reson. 2007;186:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chekmenev EY, Hovener J, Norton VA, Harris K, Batchelder LS, Bhattacharya P, Ross BD, Weitekamp DP. PASADENA hyperpolarization of succinic acid for MRI and NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:4212–4213. doi: 10.1021/ja7101218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zacharias NM, Chan HR, Sailasuta N, Ross BD, Bhattacharya P. Real-Time Molecular Imaging of Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Metabolism in Vivo by Hyperpolarized 1-C-13 Diethyl Succinate. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:934–943. doi: 10.1021/ja2040865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hövener JB, Chekmenev EY, Harris KC, Perman W, Tran T, Ross BD, Bhattacharya P. Quality assurance of PASADENA hyperpolarization for 13C biomolecules. Magn Reson Mater Phy. 2009;22:123–134. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0154-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Goldman M, Johannesson H. Conversion of a proton pair para order into C-13 polarization by rf irradiation, for use in MRI. C R Physique. 2005;6:575–581. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Suefke M, Liebisch A, Blümich B, Appelt S. External high-quality-factor resonator tunes up nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature Phys. 2015;11:767–771. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Patz S, Muradian I, Hrovat MI, Ruset IC, Topulos G, Covrig SD, Frederick E, Hatabu H, Hersman FW, Butler JP. Human pulmonary imaging and spectroscopy with hyperpolarized Xe-129 at 0.2T. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:713–727. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chekmenev EY, Norton VA, Weitekamp DP, Bhattacharya P. Hyperpolarized 1H NMR Employing Low gamma Nucleus for Spin Polarization Storage. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:3164–3165. doi: 10.1021/ja809634u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Day SE, Kettunen MI, Gallagher FA, Hu DE, Lerche M, Wolber J, Golman K, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Brindle KM. Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized C-13 magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Nat Med. 2007;13:1382–1387. doi: 10.1038/nm1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Golman K, in’t Zandt R, Thaning M. Real-time metabolic imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11270–11275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601319103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Comment A, Merritt ME. Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance as a Sensitive Detector of Metabolic Function. Biochemistry. 2014;53:7333–7357. doi: 10.1021/bi501225t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bhattacharya P, Chekmenev EY, Reynolds WF, Wagner S, Zacharias N, Chan HR, Bünger R, Ross BD. Parahydrogen-induced polarization (PHIP) hyperpolarized MR receptor imaging in vivo: a pilot study of 13C imaging of atheroma in mice. NMR Biomed. 2011;24:1023–1028. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brindle KM. Imaging Metabolism with Hyperpolarized 13C-Labeled Cell Substrates. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:6418–6427. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.McDermott R, Trabesinger AH, Muck M, Hahn EL, Pines A, Clarke J. Liquid-state NMR and scalar couplings in microtesla magnetic fields. Science. 2002;295:2247–2249. doi: 10.1126/science.1069280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sjolander TF, Tayler MCD, King JP, Budker D, Pines A. Transition-Selective Pulses in Zero-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J Phys Chem A. 2016;120:4343–4348. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b04017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Barskiy DA, Kovtunov KV, Koptyug IV, He P, Groome KA, Best QA, Shi F, Goodson BM, Shchepin RV, Truong ML, Coffey AM, Waddell KW, Chekmenev EY. In Situ and Ex Situ Low-Field NMR Spectroscopy and MRI Endowed by SABRE Hyperpolarization. ChemPhysChem. 2014;15:4100–4107. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201402607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nikolaou P, Coffey AM, Ranta K, Walkup LL, Gust B, Barlow MJ, Rosen MS, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. Multi-Dimensional Mapping of Spin-Exchange Optical Pumping in Clinical-Scale Batch-Mode 129Xe Hyperpolarizers. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:4809–4816. doi: 10.1021/jp501493k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nikolaou P, Coffey AM, Walkup LL, Gust B, LaPierre C, Koehnemann E, Barlow MJ, Rosen MS, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. A 3D-Printed High Power Nuclear Spin Polarizer. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:1636–1642. doi: 10.1021/ja412093d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sarracanie M, Armstrong BD, Stockmann J, Rosen MS. High speed 3D overhauser-enhanced MRI using combined b-SSFP and compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:735–745. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sarracanie M, LaPierre CD, Salameh N, Waddington DEJ, Witzel T, Rosen MS. Low-Cost High-Performance MRI. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15177. doi: 10.1038/srep15177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Carias MF, Dominguez-Viqueira W, Santyr GE. Improving Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Hyperpolarized Noble Gas MR Imaging at 73.5 mT Using Multiturn Litz Wire Radiofrequency Receive Coils. Concept Magnetic Res B. 2011;39B:37–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Krjukov E, Fichele S, Wild JM, Paley MNJ. Design and evaluation of a low field system for hyperpolarized 3-He gas imaging of neonatal lungs. Concept Magnetic Res B. 2007;31B:209–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Venkatesh AK, Zhang AX, Mansour J, Kubatina L, Oh CH, Blasche G, Unlu MS, Balamore D, Jolesz FA, Goldberg BB, Albert MS. MRI of the lung gas-space at very low-field using hyperpolarized noble gases. Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;21:773–776. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(03)00178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Hu DE, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, in’t Zandt R, Jensen PR, Karlsson M, Golman K, Lerche MH, Brindle KM. Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized C-13-labelled bicarbonate. Nature. 2008;453:940–U973. doi: 10.1038/nature07017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Brindle K, Chekmenev EY, Comment A, Cunningham CH, DeBerardinis RJ, Green GG, Leach MO, Rajan SS, Rizi RR, Ross BD, Warren WS, Malloy CR. Analysis of Cancer Metabolism by Imaging Hyperpolarized Nuclei: Prospects for Translation to Clinical Research . Neoplasia. 2011;13:81–97. doi: 10.1593/neo.101102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Shchepin RV, Barskiy DA, Coffey AM, Feldman MA, Kovtunova LM, Bukhtiyarov VI, Kovtunov KV, Goodson BM, Koptyug IV, Chekmenev EY. Robust Imidazole-15N2 Synthesis for High-Resolution Low-Field (0.05 T) 15N Hyperpolarized NMR Spectroscopy. ChemistrySelect. 2017;2:4478–4483. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shchepin RV, Truong ML, Theis T, Coffey AM, Shi F, Waddell KW, Warren WS, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. Hyperpolarization of “Neat” Liquids by NMR Signal Amplification by Reversible Exchange. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015;6:1961–1967. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shchepin RV, Barskiy DA, Coffey AM, Theis T, Shi F, Warren WS, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. 15N Hyperpolarization of Imidazole-15N2 for Magnetic Resonance pH Sensing via SABRE-SHEATH. ACS Sensors. 2016;1:640–644. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES