Table 1:
FULL (1% threshold) | UNIQUE (3.5% threshold) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Correct/true | Incorrect/false | Ambiguous | No ID | Correct/true | Incorrect/false | Ambiguous | No ID | |
Nearest neighbour | 155 | 19 | – | – | 44 | 0 | – | – |
Best close match | 147 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Thresh ID | 142 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
FULL (3.5% threshold) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Correct/true | Incorrect/false | Ambiguous | No ID | |
Best close match | 152 | 6 | 0 | 16 |
Thresh ID | 141 | 5 | 12 | 16 |
Summary of results of genetic distance-based evaluations of the AusPreda_12S mini-barcode conducted using the R package SPIDER to analyse the “FULL” (at 1% and 3.5% thresholds) and “UNIQUE” (at 3.5% threshold) reference sequence databases. The thresholds were calculated based on the minimum cumulative error (Additional file 6), and the 3.5% threshold for the “FULL” database allows for comparison between the 2 databases. The specified genetic distance thresholds were used for the BestCloseMatch and ThreshID analyses.