Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2017 Jun 14;292(31):12764–12771. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.791962

Cytosolic iron chaperones: Proteins delivering iron cofactors in the cytosol of mammalian cells

Caroline C Philpott ‡,1, Moon-Suhn Ryu §, Avery Frey , Sarju Patel
PMCID: PMC5546017  PMID: 28615454

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells contain hundreds of metalloproteins that are supported by intracellular systems coordinating the uptake and distribution of metal cofactors. Iron cofactors include heme, iron–sulfur clusters, and simple iron ions. Poly(rC)-binding proteins are multifunctional adaptors that serve as iron ion chaperones in the cytosolic/nuclear compartment, binding iron at import and delivering it to enzymes, for storage (ferritin) and export (ferroportin). Ferritin iron is mobilized by autophagy through the cargo receptor, nuclear co-activator 4. The monothiol glutaredoxin Glrx3 and BolA2 function as a [2Fe-2S] chaperone complex. These proteins form a core system of cytosolic iron cofactor chaperones in mammalian cells.

Keywords: iron, iron metabolism, iron–sulfur protein, metalloprotein, molecular chaperone, BolA2, poly C-binding protein, glutaredoxin

Introduction

High-throughput approaches to elucidating the roles of metals in biology are in their infancy, yet they have yielded some surprising results (1, 2). Based on the findings from three species of prokaryotes (3), metalloproteins make up one-third of the cellular proteome. Of these, only half have been previously identified as metalloproteins. Iron and zinc are the most abundant metals in eukaryotic cells, and new iron-containing proteins continue to be identified in mammalian cells (46).

Because of the extent and complexity of the metalloproteome, cells require a distribution system for metal cofactors. Iron cofactors in the form of simple ionic iron, iron–sulfur clusters, and heme need to be taken up, assembled, and synthesized, respectively, before delivery to their recipient apoproteins, which localize to nearly every compartment of the cell. Mitochondria are the ultimate sites of heme synthesis and the initial sites of iron–sulfur cluster assembly. Nevertheless, heme, iron–sulfur clusters, and iron ions are required cofactors in the cytosol and nucleus as well. This review will focus on recent studies examining the trafficking of cytosolic iron cofactors and the function of cytosolic chaperone proteins in mammalian cells.

Poly r(C)-binding proteins are iron chaperones for iron transporters

The term metallochaperone is used to describe a metal-binding protein that mediates the transfer of the bound metal to a recipient apoprotein via a metal-mediated protein-protein interaction (7). Metallochaperones with specificity for iron, copper, and possibly zinc have been identified in eukaryotes (811). Poly r(C)-binding proteins (PCBPs)2 are a family of four multifunctional adaptor proteins that bind iron, single-stranded nucleic acids, and proteins, altering the fates of each of these ligands (1216). PCBP1 and PCBP2 were initially identified as RNA-binding proteins called HN-RNP E1 and E2 or αCP-1 and -2. In their RNA-binding capacity, they affect the splicing, polyadenylation, processing, translation, and stability of many RNA species with cells. PCBP1 was later identified as an iron chaperone for ferritin (11), the major iron storage protein found in most eukaryotes (17). PCBP1 and PCBP2 can bind ferrous iron in vitro in a 3:1 Fe/PCBP stoichiometric ratio with low micromolar affinity, similar to the concentrations of kinetically labile iron that have been measured in cells (18). PCBP1 and PCBP2 were subsequently found to deliver iron cofactors to two classes of non-heme iron enzymes localized to the cytosol (19, 20). Studies continue to indicate that PCBP1 and PCBP2 play integral roles in cellular iron trafficking.

Iron initially enters the cytosol of mammalian cells via transmembrane transporters with specificity for divalent metal cations. These include DMT1 (SLC11A2) (21) and the ZIP-family transporters ZIP8 (SLC39A8) (22) and ZIP14 (SLC39A14) (23). A recent report suggests that PCBP2 can directly interact with DMT1 and facilitate the transfer of iron from DMT1 to the cytosol (24). In a yeast two-hybrid screen for proteins interacting with the amino-terminal domain of DMT1, the investigators identified two clones coding for the second HN-RNP K-homology (KH) domain of PCBP2. The second KH domain of PCBP2 differs from that of PCBP1 by only five similar amino acids. Nevertheless, full-length PCBP2 bound DMT1 both in vitro and in HEp-2 cells, whereas PCBP1 did not. Similarly, depletion of PCBP2 in cells impaired uptake of iron, whereas depletion of PCBP1 did not. These studies suggest that PCBP2 has a unique chaperone function facilitating iron uptake in HEp-2 cells. In contrast, when PCBP2 is depleted in HEK293 cells (19) or erythroid progenitor cells (25), total iron accumulation is not impaired, suggesting that the relative contribution of PCBP2 to iron uptake may differ among cell types or that concomitant loss of efflux may compensate for a loss of import activity.

A single transporter, ferroportin, accounts for iron efflux activity in mammalian cells (2628). Yanatori et al. (29) also find that PCBP2 binds to ferroportin at its carboxyl terminus in an iron-dependent manner. Overexpression of ferroportin in iron-loaded HEp-2 cells is associated with loss of intracellular iron. In cells depleted of PCBP2, this loss of intracellular iron is attenuated, suggesting that the interaction of PCBP2 with ferroportin promotes the efflux of cytosolic iron. Further investigation will clarify the relative contributions of the interactions of PCBP2 with DMT1 or ferroportin on iron transport activities.

PCBP1 and PCBP2 facilitate the metallation of ferritin and non-heme iron enzymes

PCBP1 was initially identified as an iron chaperone for ferritin in a forward genetic screen in which iron loading of human ferritin was reconstituted in the cytosol of bakers' yeast expressing cDNAs derived from human liver (11). Animal ferritins have a conserved and distinctive structure, which consists of 24 subunits that form a hollow sphere in which iron oxyhydroxides accumulate (30). Animals express three types of ferritins: H-chain, L-chain, and mitochondrial chains. Cytosolic ferritin is assembled from a mixture of H- and L-chains (31). H-ferritin has ferroxidase activity and an active site similar to other oxo-bridged diiron enzymes. The enzymatic active sites are located within the interior of the ferritin sphere. As PCBP1 can only interact with the exterior of the ferritin shell, it is likely to transfer its bound iron to sites located in the ferritin pores that funnel iron to the interior. Studies utilizing heterologous expression of ferritins and PCBPs in bakers' yeast indicate that PCBP2, which is 83% identical to PCBP1, and PCBP3, which exhibits lesser sequence identity, can also function as iron chaperones for ferritin (32). PCBP4 expression in yeast activates the iron deficiency response, suggesting a potential role in iron metabolism, but it exhibits weaker genetic and physical interaction with ferritin. Of the PCBPs, only PCBP1 and PCBP2 are ubiquitously expressed at high levels in mammalian cells and can therefore be studied by in vivo depletion. Huh7 cells depleted of either PCBP1 or PCBP2 exhibit defects in ferritin iron loading, consistent with their activities in yeast. PCBP3 and PCBP4 are expressed at low levels in some tissues and at some phases of development. These low levels of expression may not be sufficient to mediate iron chaperone activity, as formation of iron and client protein complexes are kinetically favored only when expression levels of the chaperone are high.

The iron chaperone activities of PCBP1 and PCBP2 are not limited to ferritin. Cytosolic enzymes activated by simple mono-nuclear or di-nuclear iron centers are also clients of these chaperones. The study of chaperone activities in cells is challenging due to the tendency of iron enzymes to lose their cofactors when cells are lysed and exposed to air. Thus, enzyme activities that can be monitored in intact cells are the best candidates for study. The prolyl and asparagyl hydroxylases that trigger degradation of HIF1α are such candidates. They require coordination of a single iron ion in the active site to activate oxygen for the hydroxylation reaction. In cultured human cells depleted of PCBP1 or, to a lesser extent, PCBP2, HIF1α accumulates, and these enzymes exhibit reduced activity due to absence of the iron cofactor. The hydroxylases are detectable in complexes with PCBP1 after affinity capture, but the enzymes are not detected in stoichiometric amounts, suggesting that the interactions are transient (20).

Similarly, a recent study found that PCBP1 and PCBP2 were required for the metallation of the di-nuclear iron enzyme deoxyhypusine hydroxylase (DOHH) (19). DOHH catalyzes the second step in the conversion of a lysine residue to hypusine in eukaryotic initiation factor 5a (33). Although hypusination occurs at only a single residue on a single protein, it is conserved among all eukaryotes and is essential for life. The first step of hypusine synthesis is the aminobutylation of lysine by deoxyhypusine synthase to form deoxyhypusine. In the second step, DOHH hydroxylates deoxyhypusine to form hypusine. In cells lacking PCBP1 or PCBP2, deoxyhypusine accumulates and hypusine levels fall, indicating a loss of DOHH activity. Two iron ions in the active site of DOHH form a peroxo bridge to activate oxygen for this reaction (34). The apo- and holo-forms of the enzyme can be distinguished by their distinct electrophoretic mobilities. The holo-form is specifically lost in cells depleted of PCBP1 or PCBP2, indicating absence of the iron cofactor. Again, DOHH and PCBP1 are detectable as a complex that is stabilized in cells supplemented with iron.

These mono- and di-nuclear iron enzymes are structurally distinct; they utilize different substrates and co-substrates, and their reaction mechanisms differ. Yet they exhibit similar iron chaperone requirements. PCBP chaperone activity exhibits the greatest contribution to enzyme activity in cells made mildly iron-deficient. Incubating cells in supplemental iron can restore both prolylhydroxylase and DOHH activities in cells lacking PCBPs. Although the details of the reaction mechanisms are not known for all enzymes of these classes, both coordinate Fe(II) in the active site and both require oxidation of the Fe(II) centers to Fe(III) or Fe(IV) as part of the reaction mechanism (35, 36). Thus, restoration of the Fe(II) oxidation state is required to maintain enzyme activity. Although soluble reductants (e.g. ascorbate for prolylhydroxylases) may aid in reduction of oxidized iron centers, replacement of lost iron cofactors through PCBP activity may support the enzymatic activity in cells.

Erythropoietic cells depend on PCBP1-mediated iron flux through ferritin

Previous studies on iron chaperones examined their role in general cultured cell models. Mammals and individual mammalian tissues, however, exhibit markedly different patterns of iron transport and utilization. For example, intestinal epithelial cells are specialized for dietary iron uptake and efflux to the systemic circulation. The liver exhibits high levels of both iron utilization and storage. But no tissue is more highly specialized for iron handling than the erythron. In humans, 25 mg of iron per day is routed to the bone marrow, which releases into the bloodstream more than 2 million reticulocytes every second (37). Iron is taken up by erythropoietic precursors and intracellularly routed to the mitochondria, where it is used to synthesize heme that is ultimately incorporated into hemoglobin. The processes of iron accumulation, heme synthesis, and globin synthesis are precisely controlled during red cell development, as excesses of any of these components are toxic to developing red cells (38). Red cells develop from hematopoietic precursors that differentiate into erythroid progenitors. Terminal differentiation of erythroid cells begins with a dramatic expansion of transferrin-bound iron uptake. Ex vivo studies in erythroid progenitors indicate that intracellular iron initially accumulates in ferritin, which is also dramatically up-regulated during differentiation (39). Iron is later transferred to mitochondria and incorporated into heme. This would suggest that ferritin storage plays an important role in intracellular iron flux. However, a mouse model of ferritin deficiency exhibits relatively normal red blood cell production, indicating that ferritin can be bypassed in the delivery of iron to mitochondria in these cells (40). However, these mice also exhibit alterations of multiple iron parameters that could compensate for the loss of erythroid ferritin.

A recent study clarifies the role of ferritin in erythroid development and highlights the requirement for PCBP1 iron chaperone activity (25). Using both in vitro and ex vivo models of red cell development, PCBP1 depletion led to defects in the delivery of intracellular iron to ferritin, which in turn resulted in defects in iron incorporation into heme. As these cells had no defects in transferrin-iron uptake, these data indicated that PCBP1-mediated delivery of iron to ferritin is an important step in the trafficking of erythroid iron. The observation that iron supplementation did not correct the heme synthesis defect of PCBP1-deficient cells supported this interpretation. PCBP1-ferritin complexes were abundantly isolated in these cells, supporting a model of direct transfer of iron from PCBP1 to ferritin. The PCBP1-mediated delivery of iron to ferritin was likely highest in the early stages of terminal differentiation, as the measured binding of PCBP1 to ferritin was high in early stages and diminished greatly in later stages of differentiation.

A surprising finding in these studies was the antagonistic role played by PCBP2. Whereas depletion of PCBP2 in general cell culture models has inhibitory effects on iron delivery to non-heme iron enzymes, in the red cell differentiation model, depletion of PCBP2 enhanced iron delivery to ferritin, PCBP1 binding to ferritin, and incorporation of iron into heme. The enhanced activities in PCBP2-depleted cells were dependent on the expression of PCBP1. Thus, in developing red cells, PCBP2 seems to function by diverting iron or iron-PCBP1 complexes away from ferritin. Perhaps PCBP2 is involved in ensuring the delivery of iron to other iron-dependent enzymes that continue to function in the red cell cytosol and nucleus.

These studies also employed a mouse model of inducible PCBP1 depletion (25). Post-natal PCBP1 deficiency resulted in heme deficiency in erythropoietic tissues and the development of microcytic anemia, with changes in red cell parameters that were similar to those seen in iron-deficiency anemia. The development of anemia in these mice was accompanied by compensatory changes in erythropoietic regulatory hormones, specifically erythropoietin, erythroferrone, and hepcidin. Thus, the PCBP1-mediated trafficking of iron through ferritin occurs in animal tissues and is physiologically important for hematopoiesis.

Nuclear co-activator 4 directs ferritin to autophagosomes for degradation and iron release

The iron chaperone activity of PCBP1 clearly facilitates the sequestration of iron in ferritin. Recent studies have also illuminated the machinery involved in ferritin iron release. Experiments monitoring the turnover of ferritin and the release of ferritin iron indicate that most iron release occurs with ferritin degradation (41, 42). Degradation largely occurs within the lysosome and involves the process of autophagy (43). The means to sort ferritin into the lysosome remained obscure until two groups independently identified nuclear co-activator 4 (NCOA4) as an autophagic cargo receptor for ferritin (44, 45). NCOA4 was initially identified as a coactivator for a variety of nuclear hormone receptors (46, 47). Proteomic approaches identified it in autophagosomes, however. Further investigation revealed that NCOA4 functioned as an autophagic cargo receptor, specifically recognizing ferritin and sorting it into autophagosomes destined for lysosomal fusion and degradation. The carboxyl-terminal domain of NCOA4 specifically interacted with H-ferritin subunits via conserved arginine 26, which is located on the surface of the 24-mer, and is not present on L-chain.

Deprivation of general nutrients or iron triggers the autophagic turnover of ferritin via NCOA4 in cultured cells. Iron appears to regulate this process in part by stimulating the turnover of NCOA4 itself (48). Cells deprived of iron accumulate NCOA4, leading to ferritin autophagy and iron liberation. Cells supplemented with iron degrade NCOA4, thereby impeding the autophagic degradation of ferritin. The iron-dependent turnover of NCOA4 may be mediated by direct binding of iron, as iron is detected in stoichiometric amounts in a purified, recombinant fragment of NCOA4.

The E3 ubiquitin ligase HERC2 partially accounts for the iron-dependent turnover of NCOA4 (48). HERC2 is detected in complexes with NCOA4, and removal of iron through chelation prevents HERC2 binding in cells and in vitro. Cells lacking HERC2 accumulate NCOA4, even in the presence of supplemental iron, although HERC2-independent turnover of NCOA4 is also detected. When cytosolic iron levels are high, NCOA4 binds iron and undergoes ubiquitination by HERC2, leading to degradation of NCOA4 and stabilization of ferritin. Thus, the release of iron from ferritin can be suppressed by the accumulation of iron in the cytosol. Other methods of regulating the autophagic turnover of ferritin are likely, as NCOA4 is transcriptionally induced under certain conditions of high ferritin turnover, such as erythroid cell development (25, 49).

The role of NCOA4 in ferritin turnover has been confirmed using knock-out mouse models (48, 50). In NCOA4-null mice, ferritin and iron accumulate in liver and spleen. Despite the abundance of tissue iron, these animals manifest a mild microcytic anemia, similar to that of animals lacking PCBP1 (50). These mice are hypersensitive to iron deficiency and rapidly develop severe anemia, profound microcytosis, and hypochromia when challenged with an iron-deficient diet. These studies did not determine whether the failure to mobilize iron stored in liver and spleen accounted for the anemia in the NCOA4-null animals or whether a direct role for NCOA4 in iron trafficking within the erythron was responsible for the phenotype. However, depletion of NCOA4 in human K562 cells interfered with hemoglobin formation (48). Furthermore, depletion of NCOA4 in murine erythroid cells triggered accumulation of iron in ferritin along with defects in iron incorporation into heme and hemoglobin, suggesting that the anemia could be accounted for by an intrinsic defect in erythroid iron trafficking (25).

The question of how ferritin iron that is released within the lumen of the lysosome is delivered to the cytosol or mitochondria for utilization is unresolved. Endosomal ferric reductase activities and iron transporters may exhibit dual localization in lysosomes or specific lysosomal systems may exist. These may facilitate the transfer of ferrous iron out of the lysosome. Erythroid development could rely on an alternative mechanism, however, as a direct mechanism of iron transfer from endosomes to mitochondria has been proposed for circulating reticulocytes (51), and a similar mechanism may operate to transfer iron from lysosomes to mitochondria in earlier stages of terminal erythroid differentiation (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Iron flux in developing erythrocytes. A, early (proerythroblast). In the earliest stages of terminal differentiation, proerythroblasts up-regulate transferrin receptor (TfR) and begin accumulating iron. Iron is bound by PCBP1 and delivered to ferritin. Turnover of ferritin is low; heme and hemoglobin synthesis has not begun. B, mid (basophilic to orthochromatic erythroblast). At the middle stages of development, iron is delivered to ferritin, and NCOA4 captures ferritin and directs it into the autophagosome, which fuses with the lysosome. Lysosomal iron is delivered to mitochondria by an undetermined mechanism that could involve direct transfer. Heme and hemoglobin synthesis is high. C, late (reticulocyte). In late erythrocyte development, circulating reticulocytes progressively lose intracellular organelles; heme and hemoglobin synthesis slows to a stop. Iron is not directed into ferritin and may be delivered directly to mitochondria for heme synthesis. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 25.

Iron–sulfur cluster trafficking via glutaredoxin-BolA complexes

Trafficking of cytosolic ferrous ions to ferritin for storage or to non-heme iron enzymes for utilization occurs through the activities of PCBP-family iron chaperones. Iron ions are similarly needed for the de novo synthesis or repair of iron–sulfur clusters in the cytosol. Much progress has been made using genetic, proteomic, and biochemical approaches to identify components of the machinery that distributes [4Fe-4S] clusters in the cytosol (52). HEK293 cells lacking PCBP1 or PCBP2 exhibit loss of activity in cytosolic aconitase (19), an enzyme with a labile [4Fe-4S] cluster. PCBP1 or PCBP2 may be involved in repair of Fe-S cluster damage, but this activity has not been directly demonstrated. Details of early steps in cytosolic Fe-S biogenesis are less clear. Although some precursor for iron–sulfur cluster assembly originates in mitochondria and is exported to the cytosol; the chemical nature of this precursor and whether it contains only inorganic sulfur, sulfur and iron, or an iron–sulfur cluster has not been determined. Similarly, whether the iron ions in iron–sulfur clusters originate from the mitochondria or from the cytosol remains unclear. The simplest clusters in the cytosol are [2Fe-2S] clusters, and recent investigations in cells and in vitro have indicated that these Fe-S clusters in the cytosol are carried in complexes containing monothiol glutaredoxins (Grxs) and BolA-like proteins.

The capacity of Grxs to serve as [2Fe-2S] carriers in many species is well-documented (53), as is their importance in Fe-S cluster assembly and distribution in mitochondria (5456). Cytosolic Grxs have important roles in iron homeostasis and in maintaining the activity of cytosolic iron enzymes in yeast (57, 58). The role of Grx in yeast is not precisely duplicated in mammals, which express a single cytosolic Grx, Glrx3. Glrx3 contains two tandem glutaredoxin domains, rather than the single domain found in yeast species, and both domains can independently coordinate a bridging [2Fe-2S] cluster as a homodimer in vitro (59, 60). Although Glrx3 may coordinate Fe-S clusters as a homodimer in vitro, this species does not accumulate to detectable levels in human cells. In HEK293 cells, Glrx homodimers are detected as a minor, unstable species; homodimers are preferentially formed in iron-deficient, rather than iron-replete, cells and do not require the amino acid residues that coordinate Fe-S clusters (61). Human cells lacking Glrx3 exhibit moderate deficiencies in cytosolic Fe-S enzyme activities, mildly altered iron homeostasis, and mild deficiencies in mitochondrial iron cofactors (62). The milder human cell phenotypes indicate Glrx3 has differing roles in yeast and human cells or that redundant systems can partially substitute for Glrx3 function in mammalian cells.

Both mitochondrial and cytosolic Grxs from many species may form complexes with BolA-like proteins (63). BolAs are conserved small proteins ubiquitously found in eukaryotes and prokaryotes (64). Separate loci encode BolA proteins that exclusively localize to either mitochondria or the cytosol. In yeast and humans, BolA1 and BolA3 localize to mitochondria, where they function in Fe-S cluster metabolism (6567). In budding (6873) and fission (7477) yeasts, cytosolic BolA (called Fra2) associates with cytosolic Grx and effects iron-dependent regulation of transcription factors through the transfer of [2Fe-2S] clusters. As these transcription factors are not present in mammalian cells, the sole cytosolic BolA protein in mammals, BolA2, must have a different function.

Studies using recombinant Glrx3 and BolA2 demonstrate that these protomers form a heterotrimeric complex that consists of one Glrx3 and two BolA2 protomers that stably coordinate two bridging [2Fe-2S] clusters (60, 78). As with Glrx3 homodimers, each cluster is coordinated by the active-site cysteine and a glutathione in the Grx domain and a conserved histidine residue in BolA2. A fourth ligand for the cluster has not been clearly identified. In vitro, Glrx3 homodimers with bound [2Fe-2S] clusters undergo spontaneous rearrangement in the presence of recombinant BolA2 to form Glrx3-[2Fe-2S]2-BolA22 complexes, suggesting that clusters preferentially form on the heterotrimeric complex.

Glrx3-BolA2 complexes function as [2Fe-2S] chaperones in mammalian cells. In human cells, Glrx3 and BolA2 form a complex only when they coordinate bridging [2Fe-2S] clusters (61); in cells supplemented with iron, the pool of clusters coordinated by Glrx3 and BolA2 rapidly expands to form a reservoir of cytosolic [2Fe-2S] clusters. In vitro work demonstrates Glrx3-BolA2 complexes (and Glrx3 homodimers) can transfer [2Fe-2S] clusters to the Fe-S protein ciapin1 (Cpn1) (59, 78). Human and yeast Cpn1 coordinates either a pair of [2Fe-2S] clusters or a single [2Fe-2S] and a [4Fe-4S] cluster (7983). It functions in the early steps of cytosolic [4Fe-4S] cluster assembly in a complex with the flavoprotein Ndor1. The Ndor1-Cpn1 complex is thought to ferry electrons to the downstream components of the [4Fe-4S] cluster assembly machinery; whether it also transfers Fe-S clusters is not known. The amino-terminal thioredoxin domain of Glrx3 mediates the initial interaction with Cpn1 in vitro and is required for cluster transfer (59).

Work in human cells supports the role of Glrx3-BolA2 complexes as [2Fe-2S] cluster chaperones (61). In cells, a large fraction of Glrx3 is stably associated with Cpn1. However, a mutant Glrx3 that does not coordinate [2Fe-2S] clusters also fails to complex with Cpn1, suggesting that, in addition to the thioredoxin domain, [2Fe-2S] clusters contribute to initial complex formation. BolA2 is only weakly detected in Cpn1 complexes, suggesting that it is released when Glrx3 joins the Cpn1 complex. Using radioisotopic labeling of cells, iron, likely in the form of Fe-S clusters, is readily detected in Cpn1 complexes after affinity purification. This iron is lost in cells lacking Glrx3 or BolA2, suggesting that [2Fe-2S] clusters from Glrx3-BolA2 complexes accounted for much of the iron bound by Cpn1. Actual transfer of the [2Fe-2S] clusters from Glrx3-BolA2 to Cpn1 in cells occurs, as dissociation of Glrx3 from affinity-purified Cpn1 is accomplished without the loss of radiolabeled Fe-S clusters. These studies all indicate that Glrx3-BolA2 complexes in mammalian cells function as [2Fe-2S] cluster chaperones, storing and delivering [2Fe-2S] clusters via direct protein-protein interactions (Fig. 2). Whether Glrx3 and BolA2 transfer [2Fe-2S] clusters to proteins other than Cpn1 remains to be explored. The iron found in the Cpn1 complex did not completely disappear in cells lacking Glrx3 or BolA2; the source of this residual iron is not clear. It may represent a [4Fe-4S] cluster that is not derived from Glrx3-BolA2 or iron from an alternative source of [2Fe-2S] clusters in the cell. MitoNEET is a [2Fe-2S] cluster protein localized to the outer membrane of mitochondria. In vitro, [2Fe-2S] clusters on MitoNEET can be transferred to purified Cpn1 (84). In cells, depletion of MitoNEET is associated with mild to moderate loss of cytosolic aconitase activity (85). Whether MitoNEET can directly transfer clusters to apoproteins in cells awaits further investigation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Glrx3 and BolA2 function as a [2Fe-2S] cluster chaperone. Apo-Glrx3 is found in cells as both monomers and transiently as homodimers. Glrx3 and BolA2 can form heterotrimers that coordinate a pair of bridging [2Fe-2S] clusters. The Glrx3-[2Fe-2S]2-Bola22 complex can directly bind and transfer iron to ciapin1 of the Ndor1-ciapin1 complex. Glrx3 may remain stably associated with the Ndor1-ciapin1 complex after cluster transfer, but BolA2 dissociates. The Ndor1-ciapin1 complex can coordinate a [4Fe-4S] cluster in lieu of one of the [2Fe-2S] clusters. Electrons may be transferred through the Ndor1-ciapin complex to downstream components of the cytosolic Fe-S machinery. Whether Fe-S clusters are transferred is not known. Pcbp1 may contribute to the flow of iron ions into the cytosolic Fe-S cluster pool.

Although metal researchers have made progress in understanding the cytoplasmic trafficking of simple iron ions and Fe-S cluster cofactors in mammalian cells, less is known about the machinery involved in heme cofactor distribution. Similarly, despite mitochondria being the major site of iron utilization in most cells, we do not understand iron delivery to this organelle. As these investigations are at a relatively early stage, the machinery identified to date may simply be the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIDDK and the Office of Dietary Supplements, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health. This is the fifth article in the Thematic Minireview series “Metals in Biology 2017: Iron transport, storage, and the ramifications.” The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

2
The abbreviations used are:
PCBP
poly r(C)-binding protein
KH
K-homology
DOHH
deoxyhypusine hydroxylase
Grx
glutaredoxin.

References

  • 1. Hare D. J., Grubman A., Ryan T. M., Lothian A., Liddell J. R., Grimm R., Matsuda T., Doble P. A., Cherny R. A., Bush A. I., White A. R., Masters C. L., and Roberts B. R. (2013) Profiling the iron, copper and zinc content in primary neuron and astrocyte cultures by rapid online quantitative size exclusion chromatography-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Metallomics 5, 1656–1662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yannone S. M., Hartung S., Menon A. L., Adams M. W., and Tainer J. A. (2012) Metals in biology: defining metalloproteomes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 23, 89–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cvetkovic A., Menon A. L., Thorgersen M. P., Scott J. W., Poole F. L. 2nd, Jenney F. E. Jr, Lancaster W. A., Praissman J. L., Shanmukh S., Vaccaro B. J., Trauger S. A., Kalisiak E., Apon J. V., Siuzdak G., Yannone S. M., et al. (2010) Microbial metalloproteomes are largely uncharacterized. Nature 466, 779–782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Netz D. J., Stith C. M., Stümpfig M., Köpf G., Vogel D., Genau H. M., Stodola J. L., Lill R., Burgers P. M., and Pierik A. J. (2011) Eukaryotic DNA polymerases require an iron–sulfur cluster for the formation of active complexes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 125–132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stehling O., Vashisht A. A., Mascarenhas J., Jonsson Z. O., Sharma T., Netz D. J., Pierik A. J., Wohlschlegel J. A., and Lill R. (2012) MMS19 assembles iron–sulfur proteins required for DNA metabolism and genomic integrity. Science 337, 195–199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Xue X., Ramakrishnan S. K., Weisz K., Triner D., Xie L., Attili D., Pant A., Gyrffy B., Zhan M., Carter-Su C., Hardiman K. M., Wang T. D., Dame M. K., Varani J., Brenner D., Fearon E. R., and Shah Y. M. (2016) Iron uptake via DMT1 integrates cell cycle with JAK-STAT3 signaling to promote colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell Metab. 24, 447–461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Waldron K. J., Rutherford J. C., Ford D., and Robinson N. J. (2009) Metalloproteins and metal sensing. Nature 460, 823–830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lin S. J., Pufahl R. A., Dancis A., O'Halloran T. V., and Culotta V. C. (1997) A role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATX1 gene in copper trafficking and iron transport. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9215–9220 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mangani S., Meyer-Klaucke W., Moir A. J., Ranieri-Raggi M., Martini D., and Raggi A. (2003) Characterization of the zinc-binding site of the histidine-proline-rich glycoprotein associated with rabbit skeletal muscle AMP deaminase. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 3176–3184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pufahl R. A., Singer C. P., Peariso K. L., Lin S. J., Schmidt P. J., Fahrni C. J., Culotta V. C., Penner-Hahn J. E., and O'Halloran T. V. (1997) Metal ion chaperone function of the soluble Cu(I) receptor Atx1 (see comments). Science 278, 853–856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shi H., Bencze K. Z., Stemmler T. L., and Philpott C. C. (2008) A cytosolic iron chaperone that delivers iron to ferritin. Science 320, 1207–1210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chaudhury A., Chander P., and Howe P. H. (2010) Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) in cellular processes: focus on hnRNP E1's multifunctional regulatory roles. RNA 16, 1449–1462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Makeyev A. V., Chkheidze A. N., and Liebhaber S. A. (1999) A set of highly conserved RNA-binding proteins, αCP-1 and αCP-2, implicated in mRNA stabilization, are coexpressed from an intronless gene and its intron-containing paralog. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24849–24857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Makeyev A. V., and Liebhaber S. A. (2002) The poly(C)-binding proteins: a multiplicity of functions and a search for mechanisms. RNA 8, 265–278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ostareck-Lederer A., and Ostareck D. H. (2004) Control of mRNA translation and stability in haematopoietic cells: the function of hnRNPs K and E1/E2. Biol. Cell 96, 407–411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ostareck-Lederer A., and Ostareck D. H. (2012) Precision mechanics with multifunctional tools: how hnRNP K and hnRNPs E1/E2 contribute to post-transcriptional control of gene expression in hematopoiesis. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13, 391–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Arosio P., and Levi S. (2010) Cytosolic and mitochondrial ferritins in the regulation of cellular iron homeostasis and oxidative damage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1800, 783–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Epsztejn S., Kakhlon O., Glickstein H., Breuer W., and Cabantchik I. (1997) Fluorescence analysis of the labile iron pool of mammalian cells. Anal. Biochem. 248, 31–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Frey A. G., Nandal A., Park J. H., Smith P. M., Yabe T., Ryu M. S., Ghosh M. C., Lee J., Rouault T. A., Park M. H., and Philpott C. C. (2014) Iron chaperones PCBP1 and PCBP2 mediate the metallation of the dinuclear iron enzyme deoxyhypusine hydroxylase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 8031–8036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nandal A., Ruiz J. C., Subramanian P., Ghimire-Rijal S., Sinnamon R. A., Stemmler T. L., Bruick R. K., and Philpott C. C. (2011) Activation of the HIF prolyl hydroxylase by the iron chaperones PCBP1 and PCBP2. Cell Metab. 14, 647–657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Gunshin H., Mackenzie B., Berger U. V., Gunshin Y., Romero M. F., Boron W. F., Nussberger S., Gollan J. L., and Hediger M. A. (1997) Cloning and characterization of a mammalian proton-coupled metal-ion transporter. Nature 388, 482–488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wang C. Y., Jenkitkasemwong S., Duarte S., Sparkman B. K., Shawki A., Mackenzie B., and Knutson M. D. (2012) ZIP8 is an iron and zinc transporter whose cell-surface expression is up-regulated by cellular iron loading. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 34032–34043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Liuzzi J. P., Aydemir F., Nam H., Knutson M. D., and Cousins R. J. (2006) Zip14 (Slc39a14) mediates non-transferrin-bound iron uptake into cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 13612–13617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yanatori I., Yasui Y., Tabuchi M., and Kishi F. (2014) Chaperone protein involved in transmembrane transport of iron. Biochem. J. 462, 25–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ryu M. S., Zhang D., Protchenko O., Shakoury-Elizeh M., and Philpott C. C. (2017) PCBP1 and NCOA4 regulate erythroid iron storage and heme biosynthesis. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 1786–1797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Abboud S., and Haile D. J. (2000) A novel mammalian iron-regulated protein involved in intracellular iron metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19906–19912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Donovan A., Brownlie A., Zhou Y., Shepard J., Pratt S. J., Moynihan J., Paw B. H., Drejer A., Barut B., Zapata A., Law T. C., Brugnara C., Lux S. E., Pinkus G. S., Pinkus J. L., et al. (2000) Positional cloning of zebrafish ferroportin1 identifies a conserved vertebrate iron exporter. Nature 403, 776–781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. McKie A. T., Marciani P., Rolfs A., Brennan K., Wehr K., Barrow D., Miret S., Bomford A., Peters T. J., Farzaneh F., Hediger M. A., Hentze M. W., and Simpson R. J. (2000) A novel duodenal iron-regulated transporter, IREG1, implicated in the basolateral transfer of iron to the circulation. Mol. Cell 5, 299–309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yanatori I., Richardson D. R., Imada K., and Kishi F. (2016) Iron export through the transporter ferroportin 1 is modulated by the iron chaperone PCBP2. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 17303–17318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Arosio P., Elia L., and Poli M. (2017) Ferritin, cellular iron storage and regulation. IUBMB Life 69, 414–422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Carmona F., Poli M., Bertuzzi M., Gianoncelli A., Gangemi F., and Arosio P. (2017) Study of ferritin self-assembly and heteropolymer formation by the use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1861, 522–532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Leidgens S., Bullough K. Z., Shi H., Li F., Shakoury-Elizeh M., Yabe T., Subramanian P., Hsu E., Natarajan N., Nandal A., Stemmler T. L., and Philpott C. C. (2013) Each member of the poly-r(C)-binding protein 1 (PCBP) family exhibits iron chaperone activity toward ferritin. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17791–17802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dever T. E., Gutierrez E., and Shin B. S. (2014) The hypusine-containing translation factor eIF5A. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 49, 413–425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Vu V. V., Emerson J. P., Martinho M., Kim Y. S., Münck E., Park M. H., and Que L. Jr. (2009) Human deoxyhypusine hydroxylase, an enzyme involved in regulating cell growth, activates O2 with a nonheme diiron center. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 14814–14819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Costas M., Mehn M. P., Jensen M. P., and Que L. Jr. (2004) Dioxygen activation at mononuclear nonheme iron active sites: enzymes, models, and intermediates. Chem. Rev. 104, 939–986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tinberg C. E., and Lippard S. J. (2009) Revisiting the mechanism of dioxygen activation in soluble methane monooxygenase from M. capsulatus (Bath): evidence for a multi-step, proton-dependent reaction pathway. Biochemistry 48, 12145–12158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Palis J. (2014) Primitive and definitive erythropoiesis in mammals. Front. Physiol. 5, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ganz T., and Nemeth E. (2012) Iron metabolism: interactions with normal and disordered erythropoiesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a011668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Konijn A. M., Hershko C., and Izak G. (1979) Ferritin synthesis and iron uptake in developing erythroid cells. Am. J. Hematol. 6, 373–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Darshan D., Vanoaica L., Richman L., Beermann F., and Kühn L. C. (2009) Conditional deletion of ferritin H in mice induces loss of iron storage and liver damage. Hepatology 50, 852–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kidane T. Z., Sauble E., and Linder M. C. (2006) Release of iron from ferritin requires lysosomal activity. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 291, C445–C455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhang Y., Mikhael M., Xu D., Li Y., Soe-Lin S., Ning B., Li W., Nie G., Zhao Y., and Ponka P. (2010) Lysosomal proteolysis is the primary degradation pathway for cytosolic ferritin and cytosolic ferritin degradation is necessary for iron exit. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 999–1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Asano T., Komatsu M., Yamaguchi-Iwai Y., Ishikawa F., Mizushima N., and Iwai K. (2011) Distinct mechanisms of ferritin delivery to lysosomes in iron-depleted and iron-replete cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 2040–2052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Dowdle W. E., Nyfeler B., Nagel J., Elling R. A., Liu S., Triantafellow E., Menon S., Wang Z., Honda A., Pardee G., Cantwell J., Luu C., Cornella-Taracido I., Harrington E., Fekkes P., et al. (2014) Selective VPS34 inhibitor blocks autophagy and uncovers a role for NCOA4 in ferritin degradation and iron homeostasis in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 1069–1079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Mancias J. D., Wang X., Gygi S. P., Harper J. W., and Kimmelman A. C. (2014) Quantitative proteomics identifies NCOA4 as the cargo receptor mediating ferritinophagy. Nature 509, 105–109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Heinlein C. A., Ting H. J., Yeh S., and Chang C. (1999) Identification of ARA70 as a ligand-enhanced coactivator for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16147–16152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Yeh S., and Chang C. (1996) Cloning and characterization of a specific coactivator, ARA70, for the androgen receptor in human prostate cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 5517–5521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Mancias J. D., Pontano Vaites L., Nissim S., Biancur D. E., Kim A. J., Wang X., Liu Y., Goessling W., Kimmelman A. C., and Harper J. W. (2015) Ferritinophagy via NCOA4 is required for erythropoiesis and is regulated by iron dependent HERC2-mediated proteolysis. eLife 10.7554/eLife.10308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Nilsson R., Schultz I. J., Pierce E. L., Soltis K. A., Naranuntarat A., Ward D. M., Baughman J. M., Paradkar P. N., Kingsley P. D., Culotta V. C., Kaplan J., Palis J., Paw B. H., and Mootha V. K. (2009) Discovery of genes essential for heme biosynthesis through large-scale gene expression analysis. Cell Metab. 10, 119–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bellelli R., Federico G., Matte' A., Colecchia D., Iolascon A., Chiariello M., Santoro M., De Franceschi L., and Carlomagno F. (2016) NCOA4 deficiency impairs systemic iron homeostasis. Cell Rep. 14, 411–421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sheftel A. D., Zhang A. S., Brown C., Shirihai O. S., and Ponka P. (2007) Direct interorganellar transfer of iron from endosome to mitochondrion. Blood 110, 125–132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lill R., Dutkiewicz R., Freibert S. A., Heidenreich T., Mascarenhas J., Netz D. J., Paul V. D., Pierik A. J., Richter N., Stümpfig M., Srinivasan V., Stehling O., and Mühlenhoff U. (2015) The role of mitochondria and the CIA machinery in the maturation of cytosolic and nuclear iron–sulfur proteins. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 94, 280–291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Rouhier N., Couturier J., Johnson M. K., and Jacquot J. P. (2010) Glutaredoxins: roles in iron homeostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 43–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Mühlenhoff U., Gerber J., Richhardt N., and Lill R. (2003) Components involved in assembly and dislocation of iron–sulfur clusters on the scaffold protein Isu1p. EMBO J. 22, 4815–4825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Rodríguez-Manzaneque M. T., Tamarit J., Bellí G., Ros J., and Herrero E. (2002) Grx5 is a mitochondrial glutaredoxin required for the activity of iron/sulfur enzymes. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1109–1121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wingert R. A., Galloway J. L., Barut B., Foott H., Fraenkel P., Axe J. L., Weber G. J., Dooley K., Davidson A. J., Schmid B., Paw B. H., Shaw G. C., Kingsley P., Palis J., Schubert H., et al. (2005) Deficiency of glutaredoxin 5 reveals Fe-S clusters are required for vertebrate haem synthesis. Nature 436, 1035–1039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mühlenhoff U., Molik S., Godoy J. R., Uzarska M. A., Richter N., Seubert A., Zhang Y., Stubbe J., Pierrel F., Herrero E., Lillig C. H., and Lill R. (2010) Cytosolic monothiol glutaredoxins function in intracellular iron sensing and trafficking via their bound iron–sulfur cluster. Cell Metab. 12, 373–385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Li H., Mapolelo D. T., Dingra N. N., Naik S. G., Lees N. S., Hoffman B. M., Riggs-Gelasco P. J., Huynh B. H., Johnson M. K., and Outten C. E. (2009) The yeast iron regulatory proteins Grx3/4 and Fra2 form heterodimeric complexes containing a [2Fe-2S] cluster with cysteinyl and histidyl ligation. Biochemistry 48, 9569–9581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Banci L., Ciofi-Baffoni S., Gajda K., Muzzioli R., Peruzzini R., and Winkelmann J. (2015) N-terminal domains mediate [2Fe-2S] cluster transfer from glutaredoxin-3 to anamorsin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 772–778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Li H., Mapolelo D. T., Randeniya S., Johnson M. K., and Outten C. E. (2012) Human glutaredoxin 3 forms [2Fe-2S]-bridged complexes with human BolA2. Biochemistry 51, 1687–1696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Frey A. G., Palenchar D. J., Wildemann J. D., and Philpott C. C. (2016) A glutaredoxin-BolA complex serves as an iron–sulfur cluster chaperone for the cytosolic cluster assembly machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 292, M116.744946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Haunhorst P., Hanschmann E. M., Bräutigam L., Stehling O., Hoffmann B., Mühlenhoff U., Lill R., Berndt C., and Lillig C. H. (2013) Crucial function of vertebrate glutaredoxin 3 (PICOT) in iron homeostasis and hemoglobin maturation. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 1895–1903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Li H., and Outten C. E. (2012) Monothiol CGFS glutaredoxins and BolA-like proteins: [2Fe-2S] binding partners in iron homeostasis. Biochemistry 51, 4377–4389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Aldea M., Hernández-Chico C., de la Campa A. G., Kushner S. R., and Vicente M. (1988) Identification, cloning, and expression of bolA, an ftsZ-dependent morphogene of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170, 5169–5176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Cameron J. M., Janer A., Levandovskiy V., Mackay N., Rouault T. A., Tong W. H., Ogilvie I., Shoubridge E. A., and Robinson B. H. (2011) Mutations in iron–sulfur cluster scaffold genes NFU1 and BOLA3 cause a fatal deficiency of multiple respiratory chain and 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase enzymes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 486–495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Melber A., Na U., Vashisht A., Weiler B. D., Lill R., Wohlschlegel J. A., and Winge D. R. (2016) Role of Nfu1 and Bol3 in iron–sulfur cluster transfer to mitochondrial clients. eLife 5, e15991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Uzarska M. A., Nasta V., Weiler B. D., Spantgar F., Ciofi-Baffoni S., Saviello M. R., Gonnelli L., Mühlenhoff U., Banci L., and Lill R. (2016) Mitochondrial Bol1 and Bol3 function as assembly factors for specific iron–sulfur proteins. eLife 5, e16673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Kumánovics A., Chen O. S., Li L., Bagley D., Adkins E. M., Lin H., Dingra N. N., Outten C. E., Keller G., Winge D., Ward D. M., and Kaplan J. (2008) Identification of FRA1 and FRA2 as genes involved in regulating the yeast iron regulon in response to decreased mitochondrial iron–sulfur cluster synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 10276–10286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Li H., Mapolelo D. T., Dingra N. N., Keller G., Riggs-Gelasco P. J., Winge D. R., Johnson M. K., and Outten C. E. (2011) Histidine 103 in Fra2 is an iron–sulfur cluster ligand in the [2Fe-2S] Fra2-Grx3 complex and is required for in vivo iron signaling in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 867–876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ojeda L., Keller G., Muhlenhoff U., Rutherford J. C., Lill R., and Winge D. R. (2006) Role of glutaredoxin-3 and glutaredoxin-4 in the iron regulation of the Aft1 transcriptional activator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 17661–17669 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Poor C. B., Wegner S. V., Li H., Dlouhy A. C., Schuermann J. P., Sanishvili R., Hinshaw J. R., Riggs-Gelasco P. J., Outten C. E., and He C. (2014) Molecular mechanism and structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae iron regulator Aft2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 4043–4048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Pujol-Carrion N., Belli G., Herrero E., Nogues A., and de la Torre-Ruiz M. A. (2006) Glutaredoxins Grx3 and Grx4 regulate nuclear localisation of Aft1 and the oxidative stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Sci. 119, 4554–4564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Ueta R., Fujiwara N., Iwai K., and Yamaguchi-Iwai Y. (2007) Mechanism underlying the iron-dependent nuclear export of the iron-responsive transcription factor Aft1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2980–2990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Encinar del Dedo J., Gabrielli N., Carmona M., Ayté J., and Hidalgo E. (2015) A cascade of iron-containing proteins governs the genetic iron starvation response to promote iron uptake and inhibit iron storage in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Jbel M., Mercier A., and Labbé S. (2011) Grx4 monothiol glutaredoxin is required for iron limitation-dependent inhibition of Fep1. Eukaryot. Cell 10, 629–645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Mercier A., and Labbé S. (2009) Both Php4 function and subcellular localization are regulated by iron via a multistep mechanism involving the glutaredoxin Grx4 and the exportin Crm1. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 20249–20262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Vachon P., Mercier A., Jbel M., and Labbé S. (2012) The monothiol glutaredoxin Grx4 exerts an iron-dependent inhibitory effect on Php4 function. Eukaryot. Cell 11, 806–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Banci L., Camponeschi F., Ciofi-Baffoni S., and Muzzioli R. (2015) Elucidating the molecular function of human BOLA2 in GRX3-dependent anamorsin maturation pathway. J Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 16133–16143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Banci L., Bertini I., Calderone V., Ciofi-Baffoni S., Giachetti A., Jaiswal D., Mikolajczyk M., Piccioli M., and Winkelmann J. (2013) Molecular view of an electron transfer process essential for iron–sulfur protein biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 7136–7141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Banci L., Ciofi-Baffoni S., Mikolajczyk M., Winkelmann J., Bill E., and Pandelia M. E. (2013) Human anamorsin binds [2Fe-2S] clusters with unique electronic properties. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 18, 883–893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Netz D. J., Genau H. M., Weiler B. D., Bill E., Pierik A. J., and Lill R. (2016) The conserved Dre2 uses essential [2Fe-2S] and [4Fe-4S] clusters for function in cytosolic iron–sulfur protein assembly. Biochem. J. 473, 2073–2085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Netz D. J., Stümpfig M., Doré C., Mühlenhoff U., Pierik A. J., and Lill R. (2010) Tah18 transfers electrons to Dre2 in cytosolic iron–sulfur protein biogenesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 758–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Zhang Y., Lyver E. R., Nakamaru-Ogiso E., Yoon H., Amutha B., Lee D. W., Bi E., Ohnishi T., Daldal F., Pain D., and Dancis A. (2008) Dre2, a conserved eukaryotic Fe/S cluster protein, functions in cytosolic Fe/S protein biogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5569–5582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Lipper C. H., Paddock M. L., Onuchic J. N., Mittler R., Nechushtai R., and Jennings P. A. (2015) Cancer-related NEET proteins transfer 2Fe-2S clusters to anamorsin, a protein required for cytosolic iron–sulfur cluster biogenesis. PLoS One 10, e0139699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Tan G., Liu D., Pan F., Zhao J., Li T., Ma Y., Shen B., and Lyu J. (2016) His-87 ligand in mitoNEET is crucial for the transfer of iron sulfur clusters from mitochondria to cytosolic aconitase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 470, 226–232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES