Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Data logoLink to Scientific Data
. 2017 Aug 8;4:170101. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.101

Long-term chloride concentrations in North American and European freshwater lakes

Hilary A Dugan 1,2,a, Jamie C Summers 3, Nicholas K Skaff 4, Flora E Krivak-Tetley 5, Jonathan P Doubek 6, Samantha M Burke 7, Sarah L Bartlett 8, Lauri Arvola 9, Hamdi Jarjanazi 10, János Korponai 11,12, Andreas Kleeberg 13,*, Ghislaine Monet 14, Don Monteith 15, Karen Moore 16, Michela Rogora 17, Paul C Hanson 1, Kathleen C Weathers 2
PMCID: PMC5548073  PMID: 28786983

Abstract

Anthropogenic sources of chloride in a lake catchment, including road salt, fertilizer, and wastewater, can elevate the chloride concentration in freshwater lakes above background levels. Rising chloride concentrations can impact lake ecology and ecosystem services such as fisheries and the use of lakes as drinking water sources. To analyze the spatial extent and magnitude of increasing chloride concentrations in freshwater lakes, we amassed a database of 529 lakes in Europe and North America that had greater than or equal to ten years of chloride data. For each lake, we calculated climate statistics of mean annual total precipitation and mean monthly air temperatures from gridded global datasets. We also quantified land cover metrics, including road density and impervious surface, in buffer zones of 100 to 1,500 m surrounding the perimeter of each lake. This database represents the largest global collection of lake chloride data. We hope that long-term water quality measurements in areas outside Europe and North America can be added to the database as they become available in the future.

Subject terms: Freshwater ecology, Environmental chemistry, Limnology, Hydrology

Background & Summary

Recent analyses estimate there are 27 million naturally-formed lakes and human-constructed reservoirs (hereafter together referred to as lakes) on Earth with surface areas greater than 0.01 km2 (ref. 1). While these lakes account for less than four percent of Earth’s terrestrial land cover, they provide many important social and economic resources such as recreation, fisheries, irrigation, and energy production. Moreover, the vast majority2 of these lakes are freshwater lakes (salinity<1 g l−1), which are routinely used as drinking water sources. Therefore, it is critically important to protect the ecosystem services that lakes provide for humanity.

One important measure of water quality is the amount of salt, or salinity, in a lake. Chloride is often used as a measure of salinity because it is a highly conservative and highly soluble ion, is easily measured with high accuracy, and is a good proxy for salinity3,4. While lakes vary in their natural chloride concentrations due to geological factors2, changes in chloride levels can result from a response to climate5 and anthropogenic influences6. Anthropogenic sources of chloride include road salt, fertilizer, wastewater, industrial effluents, and hydrochloric acid derived from coal combustion7–11. Increasing chloride concentrations in lakes can change the acid neutralizing capacity of the water (pH), increase the transport and bioavailability of heavy metals12, increase lake stratification13, and alter ecological communities4,14,15, thereby degrading water quality and habitat.

Many long-term studies from around the world have identified anthropogenic-induced salinization of lakes, including many large freshwater bodies such as the Laurentian Great Lakes7,16, Lake Champlain17, Lake George18, Lake Constance19, and the deep subalpine lakes in Northern Italy20. To quantify the prevalence and drivers of long-term salinization in lakes worldwide, we collected chloride data from government organizations, universities, and lake associations; however, datasets covering at least ten years were only available in Europe and North America. The database presented here encompasses long-term chloride data from 529 lakes in Europe and North America, a geodatabase of lake polygon shapefiles, as well as a variety of lake characteristics, land cover metrics, and climate statistics. This database can be used to answer many questions about the salinization of freshwater lakes at different scales, and can be applied to address the impacts of salinization on the ecology of freshwater lakes21. Our hope is that other researchers will add additional lakes to expand the geographical coverage of our database so that the effects of lake salinization can be more easily addressed at a global scale.

Methods

The organizational workflow and data requirements for inclusion of lakes in the global lake chloride database are depicted in Fig. 1. All analyses were performed in the R statistical programming language22, using a suite of packages to access data and perform statistical analyses.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Workflow for all datasets included in the global lake chloride database.

Acquisition

Three primary approaches were used to collect lake chloride concentration data. Data were obtained from 1) online repositories containing datasets from multiple lakes, 2) online repositories containing data from single lakes, or 3) individual researchers, including members of the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON), and other organizations that responded to data requests. This range of approaches accounted for the multiple ways data were stored and shared, and as such, maximized the number of lakes included in our database.

For inclusion in this global lake chloride database, a site had to meet set criteria (Fig. 1).

  1. The lake must have a surface area of at least 0.04 km2 (4 ha). This was the original size cutoff instituted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their 2007 National Lakes Assessment.

  2. The long-term mean chloride concentration must be less than 1 g l−1. This removes brackish and saline lakes from the database. Saline lakes are often defined as lakes with total dissolved solids>3 g l−1 (ref. 2).

  3. The dataset must span at least ten years, and contain at least five data points. These criteria ensure both a robust measure of chloride concentrations and the ability to detect a long-term trend.

  4. The dataset must include one chloride record after 2000. This criterion was established to ensure comparability in respect to time among site records.

Once the data were collected, they were processed using an a priori metadata protocol. Each lake was assigned a project-specific identification number, and was paired with the associated data source name, source contact/acquisition information, and public accessibility designation (publicly available/private). We were unable to find any sites that met these criteria in South America, Africa, Asia, or Oceania. Many sites in the aforementioned regions had lake chloride measurements, but no records that spanned at least ten years, and therefore were not included in this database. In total, we collected 529 long-term datasets from ten countries (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Map of North America and Europe showing the locations of lakes included in the global lake chloride database.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

United States (n=315)

The majority of lakes included in this database are located in the United States (US). Data were obtained from the sources described below.

  • The Water Quality Portal (WQP, http://www.waterqualitydata.us/) is a database that amalgamates data from federal, state, tribal, and local sources in the United States. It includes data from the EPA Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS). We searched the WQP for the characteristic name ‘chloride’ in ‘lakes, reservoirs, and impoundments’, using the dataRetrieval package in R (v2.5.5 (ref. 23)). Data extracted from the WQP included 67 lakes in Minnesota monitored by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Lakes located in the Minneapolis/St Paul region are some of the most urban lakes included in the database (as determined by road density and land cover).

  • North Temperate Lakes Long Term Ecological Research Site (LTER) collects long-term chloride data for eleven lakes in Wisconsin24. Data for Lake Wingra, Lake Monona, and Lake Mendota were augmented with earlier data from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. In some cases, only annual averages were available; these sampling dates were labeled as July-01 (Lake Mendota: 1957–1972, Lake Monona: 1940–1987).

  • Hubbard Brook LTER (http://www.hubbardbrook.org/) hosts 43 years of chloride measurements from Mirror Lake, New Hampshire.

  • The Lake Champlain Basin Program provides a publicly accessible database of chloride measurements from Lake Champlain (http://www.lcbp.org/water-environment/data-monitoring/lake-and-watershed-data/). We obtained data for the Burlington Bay sampling site, and combined these with earlier data from USGS site 04295000. Lake Champlain (744 km2) is the only US lake represented in the ten largest lakes in our database.

  • The EPA manages two long-term monitoring projects, specifically focused on the effects of atmospheric deposition into surface water bodies. These programs are the Temporally Integrated Monitoring of Ecosystems and Long Term Monitoring Project. The lakes included in these programs tend to be located in remote environments in New York, Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire.

  • The New York City Department of Environmental Protection monitors chloride concentrations in all of its water supply reservoirs. Data were contributed from 10 reservoirs north of New York City. The location of sampling stations changed in 2006/07 in Boyd’s Corners, Cross River, Croton Falls, and Middle Branch Reservoirs.

  • The University of Rhode Island Watershed Watch Program provided data for 59 lakes in Rhode Island (http://web.uri.edu/watershedwatch/uri-watershed-watch-monitoring-data/). Rhode Island lakes comprise some of the most urban lakes in the database.

Canada (n=37)

Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development provided chloride data for eleven lakes in Alberta. The Water Quality Management Section of Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship provided chloride data for 16 lakes in Manitoba. Manitoba lakes represent four of the top ten largest lakes in the database, including Lake Winnipeg, the largest lake at 24,514 km2. Kawartha Conservation provided datasets exceeding 40 years for Balsam Lake, Cameron Lake, and Sturgeon Lake in Eastern Ontario. The International Institute for Sustainable Development provided data for four small lakes in the IISD Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) in northern Ontario. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change provided 15 years of data from Lake Simcoe. Of the ten largest lakes in the database, Lake Simcoe (722 km2) has the highest road density surrounding its shoreline. In 2008, the Ontario government introduced the Lake Simcoe Protection Act as a strategy to improve water quality.

Sweden (n=102)

A publicly available database of water chemistry was available through the Swedish Department of Water and Environment (http://info1.ma.slu.se/db.html). We included long-term monitoring data from a series of lakes that were designated as trend stations, which resulted in a collection of 101 lakes geographically distributed throughout the country. We also included data from data from Vänern, the largest lake in Sweden. Swedish coordinates were presented in the Swedish grid RT90 (ESPG:2400) at 10-m resolution, and were converted to WGS84.

Germany, France, and Switzerland (n=32)

Chloride data for Lake Constance were obtained from the Institut für Seenforschung in Langenargen. Data for Lake Zurich were provided by the City of Zurich Water Supply (WVZ) and the Amt für Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft (AWEL) of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Chloride data for 28 lakes in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Northern Germany were compiled for a review of German sulfate trends. All authorities and persons who supplied data are mentioned in the acknowledgements of Kleeberg25.

Data from Lake Geneva and Lake Bourget were accessed through the Alpine Lakes Observatory (SOERE OLA—Observation and Experimentation System for long-term Environmental Research). SOERE OLA is member of AnaEE-FRANCE and sponsored by AllEnvi, the National Research Alliance for the Environment. Physical, chemistry, and biodiversity data can be download using the information system developed by Eco-Informatique ORE team of the French National Institute for Agronomical Research (INRA, https://si-ola.inra.fr). INRA collects data from Lake Bourget with its partner CISALB, the intercommunal association of Lake Bourget, and Lake Geneva (also known as Lac Léman) with its partner CIPEL, the International Commission for the Protection of Leman.

Finland (n=11)

Water resource and environmental data for Finnish lakes are publicly available through the Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE) (http://www.syke.fi/en-US/Open_information). Chloride data for lakes included in our analysis were compiled by Lauri Arvola, at the University of Helsinki, through the online SYKE portal. Lakes Saimaa, Päijänne, and Inari are three of the largest lakes in the database; all lakes are over 1,000 km2.

United Kingdom (n=8)

The United Kingdom Upland Waters Monitoring Network (UK UWMN) is a consortium led by University College London (UCL), the NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), Marine Scotland and Queen Mary College (QMUL). Originally funded by UK Government Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the network is currently supported by the partner organizations and a range of regional governments, agencies, and research institutes. The UK UWMN provided chloride data for eight UK lakes.

Hungary (n=3)

Water quality data are publicly available through Middle-Transdanubian and West-Transdanubian Water Directorates. We obtained long-term data from yearly reports of water quality of the Kis-Balaton Reservoir System and of Lake Balaton. Chloride concentrations were determined by argentometric methods according to Hungarian ISO Standards.

Italy (n=1)

The Institute of Ecosystem Study of the National Research Council (CNR ISE) in Verbania, Italy, provided chloride data for Lake Maggiore20. These data are collected in the framework of the long-term research program on Lake Maggiore funded by the International Commission for the Protection of Waters between Italy and Switzerland (CIPAIS). Lake Maggiore is the westernmost of the deep subalpine lakes in Northern Italy (LTER Europe site LTER_EU_IT_008). The lake area is 212.5 km2 and its maximum depth is 370 m.

Chloride data

Each lake entry contains, at minimum, the sample date and the chloride concentration, converted to standardized units (mg l−1). Sampling depth was included for most sites. In some datasets, decadal gaps between sampling dates existed because early data points were sparse. Because trend analyses can be overly sensitive to outlying data points, we added additional quality control criteria; if a decadal gap was present in a dataset, at least five sampling points had to exist prior to the gap; otherwise, earlier data were not included. Additionally, the tsoutliers package in R (v0.6 (ref. 26)) was used to find and remove additive outlier data points, which although rare, skewed the linear and additive models’ fit to the data. The approach uses a t-statistic to test the significance of outliers at each time step and highlights those above a critical value. In our analyses, we conservatively chose a critical value of 20. In total, the data from 483 lakes were unchanged, and 64 lakes had 1–9 data points removed. The number of outliers removed from the original dataset is included in the metadata.

Lake data

Each lake was identified by its latitude and longitude (in decimal degrees) and given a unique ID number. The country, or the province/state for North American lakes, was determined from the geographic coordinates. In the United States, the county was added to the file name, as there are often lakes with duplicate names within a state. Lake areas were obtained from a variety of published data sources. In rare cases, where lake area was not available, lake area was calculated from custom shapefiles in ArcGIS (see section on shapefiles). Lakes were classified as natural lakes or reservoirs. This distinction was made from visual inspection of satellite images for a dam, or from published government reports or articles that identified the waterbody as a reservoir. 407 of the 529 lakes had maximum lake depth data, in meters. The distance of the lake to the nearest coast (km) was calculated using the coordinates of the lake and a 1:10 m coastline vector shapefile available from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com/downloads/10m-physical-vectors/10m-coastline/), using the equal-area mollweide projection. The coastline vector was edited to exclude the St Lawrence Seaway.

Climate data

To ensure homogeneity across regions, all climate data were obtained from gridded global datasets.

Temperature and precipitation

Monthly mean temperatures and annual precipitation totals were obtained using the WorldClim dataset, which contains high resolution global interpolated climate data from 1960–1990 (ref. 27). We used the highest resolution 30 s data, which is equivalent to 0.86 km2 at the equator. Lakes in the interior of North America, including those in North Dakota, Alberta, and Colorado receive less than 500 mm of precipitation a year. In contrast, some lakes in Vermont and the UK average greater than 1,300 mm a year.

Sea salt deposition

A global data set of wet and dry sea salt (NaCl) deposition was obtained from the World Data Centre for Precipitation Chemistry28 (http://www.wdcpc.org/assessment). We used the north grid of the HTAP 2001 ensemble-mean model results for emissions, deposition, and concentration, which has a spatial resolution of 1.0° latitude x 1.0° longitude28. Sea salt deposition is given as the combined total wet and dry deposition (kg ha−1 yr−1). Overall deposition was lower over North American lakes (mean=13 kg ha−1 yr−1), than European lakes (mean=38 kg ha−1 year−1). Deposition was highest in the United Kingdom, where lakes receive an average of 98 kg ha−1 of sea salt deposition each year.

Shapefiles

Shapefiles that geographically delimited the perimeter of the lakes were required to quantify surrounding land use patterns. Shapefiles were acquired via five methods:

  1. Lakes in the continental United States were included in the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD, n=336, http://nhd.usgs.gov/). The high resolution NHD data are available at 1:24,000-scale.

  2. Shapefiles for lakes in Canada were downloaded from the 1:50,000 National Hydro Network (NHN).

  3. Shapefiles for Swedish lakes were available through the Swedish Water Archives (n=102, http://www.smhi.se/klimatdata/hydrologi/sjoar-och-vattendrag/). We used surface water body layer version Vy_y_2012_2. Multiple shapefiles were merged to create a single shapefile for Vänern (pers. comm. B. Denfield).

  4. Shapefiles for European lakes greater than 0.1 km2 were obtained from the Global Lakes and Wetlands Database (GLWD Level 1 and 2) (n=43, http://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/global-lakes-and-wetlands-database). Lakes are presented at a scale of 1:1,000,000.

  5. Shapefiles for Lake Fenek (12.5 km2) and Lake Hidvegi (17.1 km2) in Hungary, and eleven other small European lakes in the UK, Germany, and Finland were not publicly available. These shapefiles were generated manually using ArcMap10.2.2.

The method by which shapefiles were acquired is included in the metadata as NHD, NHN, Sweden, GLWD, or Manual.

Land cover

We constructed buffer zones surrounding each lake to approximate the anthropogenic influence of watershed and shoreline runoff of chloride into lakes. Buffer widths of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1,000, and 1,500 m were chosen based on previous findings, such as those by Kelting et al.29, who found that >70% of total variation in chloride concentrations in Adirondack Park, NY could be explained by the road density in 320- to 1,280-m buffer zones. Regalado and Kelting30 used a 100-m buffer as an estimate of vehicular spray distance, and Read et al.31 used a 200-m buffer to understand local drivers on lake characteristics across the United States. We calculated both the percent impervious surface and total road density within buffer zones surrounding each lake as metrics for urban development. Buffer zones were constructed using the gBuffer function in the rgeos package in R (v0.3-19) (ref. 32) using local WGS84 Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone projections.

Impervious surface

Impervious surfaces are all impenetrable artificial surfaces, including roadways and parking lots (concrete and asphalt), and building roofs33. Since impervious surfaces prevent water infiltration into soils, increased runoff from these urban landscapes can threaten water resources34. Impervious surfaces have previously been linked to road salt application and the salinization of fresh waters9,35,36.

In land cover datasets, impervious surface is typically represented two ways: Method 1) a pixel is represented either as impervious or not-impervious (Boolean value), or Method 2) impervious surface is a continuous variable within each pixel from 0 to 100 percent37. The latter is a more robust quantification of impervious surface37.

United States

The 2011 United States National Land Cover Database (NLCD) is a national land cover product at a spatial resolution of 30 m (http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_data.php). The NLCD presents the option of quantifying impervious surface via both methods from above. Method 1 is implemented via the NLCD 2011 Land Cover layer38. Impervious surface was defined as the total of all pixels classified as developed. Method 2 is implemented via the NLCD 2011 Percent Developed Impervious layer39.

Canada

A national land cover product was not available for Canada. Instead, we used two different products. For Ontario, we used the Ontario Land Cover Compilation v.2.0. (https://www.ontario.ca/data/land-cover-compilation). The OLCC has a 5-m pixel resolution. Impervious surfaces include settlements/infrastructure, transportation routes, and built-up areas. For Manitoba and Alberta, we used the LULC thematic raster data from GlobeLand 30 (http://www.globallandcover.com/GLC30Download/index.aspx) at a spatial resolution of 30 m. For both products, pixels are represented as a Boolean classification of impervious surface (Method 1).

Europe

For all European lakes, we used the European Space Agency’s GIO-land (Global monitoring for environment and security/Copernicus Initial Operations land) layers (http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/landuse/gio-land). GIO-land includes a 20-m resolution layer of the percent impervious (1–100%), which enabled us to implement Method 2 for our calculation of impervious surface.

Road density

Road density has been used in previous studies as a proxy for urbanization and the application of road salt29,40,41. Road density was defined as the ratio of the length of the total road network in a given area (km) to the land area (km2). Worldwide road data were downloaded from OpenStreetMap via the osmar package in R (v1.1-7 (ref. 42)). In each buffer zone, we selected ‘ways’ tagged as highway, which included all primary, secondary, residential, and service roads. In our database, the highest road densities in a 500-m buffer were located around lakes in Minneapolis/St Paul, Minnesota and were up to 27 km km−2. Road density and percent impervious surface in buffer zones surrounding a lake were positively correlated overall (r2=0.69 in 500-m buffer, r2=0.79 in 1,500-m buffer); however, many lakes with low road density (0–5 km km−2) had 0% impervious surface.

Data Records

The final database includes three files (Data Citation 1).

  1. All descriptive lake data are formatted as a horizontal data table and is provided in chloride_concentrations.csv (Table 1).

  2. Chloride time series data are formatted as a long data table and is provided in lake_characteristics.csv (Table 2).

  3. Shapefiles for 529 lakes are provided as shapefiles in a zip file.

Table 1. Column names, column description, and percentage of sites with data for each feature for lake file.

Column name Description Coverage
SALT_ID Internal lake ID number 100%
FileName File name 100%
Common.Name Name of lake or reservoir that is commonly used. 100%
Latitude (decimal degrees) Latitudinal coordinate of lake 100%
Longitude (decimal degrees) Longitudinal coordinate of lake 100%
Continent Geographic location of lake 100%
Country Geographic location of lake 100%
State Abbreviation of state or province (only for North American lakes) 69.1%
Area.km2 Surface area of lake 100%
Depth.m Maximum depth of lake 66.4%
LakeType Type of lake: natural or reservoir 100%
YearMin Start year of dataset 100%
YearMax End year of dataset 100%
YearsTotal Total years of dataset coverage 100%
MeanCl.mgL Mean chloride concentration 100%
OutliersRemoved Number of outliers removed from original data 100%
ShapefileMethod Method used to obtain shapefile. Either: circle, GLWD, manual, NHD, or NHN. 100%
CoastDist.km Distance to the nearest coastline 100%
WetDryDep Sea salt deposition in kg ha−1 yr−1 (sum of wet and dry deposition) 100%
Precip.mm Mean annual total precipitation from 1960 to 1990 100%
TempMMM Long-term mean monthly temperatures from 1960 to 1990. MMM represents the month of the year. 100%
RoadDensityXXX Road density, where XXX represents 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1,000, and 1,500-m buffer zones surrounding the lake. Measured in km km−2. 100%
LandImperviousBinXXX Impervious surface, where XXX represents 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1,000, and 1,500-m buffer zones surrounding the lake. Calculated from datasets with binary pixels via Method 1 (see above). Measured in percent. 69.2%
LandImperviousPerXXX Impervious surface, where XXX represents 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 1,000, and 1,500-m buffer zones surrounding the lake. Calculated from datasets with percentage pixels via Method 2 (see above). Measured in percent. 92.9%
Open in a new tab

Table 2. Column name and description for lake chloride data file.

Column Name Description
SALT_ID Internal lake ID number
FileName File name
Common.Name Name of lake or reservoir that is commonly used
Station Sampling station ID. The ID is program specific and is included to cross-reference sites with original sources. For some lakes, data are present from multiple stations.
Sample.Date Date of sample collection. All data were collected on discrete days, with the exception of early data from Lake Mendota and Monona (see Methods).
Sample.Depth Depth of sample collection
Chloride Chloride concentration in mg l−1
Decimal.Date Sample date provided as decimal value
Std.Chloride Chloride concentration provided as a standardized z-score value, which was calculated for each lake
Integrated.Depth Is TRUE if sample was integrated over a portion of the water column. Is FALSE otherwise. If a sample depth is given, this was the starting depth of sampling.
Open in a new tab

The database is designed so additional lake data can be easily added as they become available. All climate and land cover metrics were derived using open source datasets, and processed using open source tools. As new long-term datasets become available, or current datasets are expanded, the database can be updated with minimal time investment.

Technical Validation

For sites where maximum lake depth was not available, we have inferred that samples were collected at the surface, although this cannot be verified. Where samples were collected at multiple depths, we visually examined a selection of these lakes and found that chloride trends were consistent throughout the water column. For example, in Lake Constance and Vänern, both large freshwater lakes, chloride concentrations in the hypolimnion (bottom waters) and the epilimnion (surface waters) show similar trends through time (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Time series of chloride concentrations in Lake Constance and Vänern. Data points are colored by lake depth.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A comparison of the two methods used for calculating impervious surface reveal the measure of impervious surface surrounding a lake using Method 1 typically returns higher estimates, these are highly correlated to values calculated using Method 2, and become more tightly correlated as buffer width increases (Figs 4 and 5).

Figure 4. Comparison of the two methods of quantifying impervious surface in 100–1,500-m buffer zones around all US lakes in the database.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

In Method 1, each pixel is a Boolean value (TRUE, impervious; FALSE, not impervious). In Method 2, each pixel is quantified as percent impervious surface from 0–100%.

Figure 5. Comparison of impervious surface and road density calculations for Trout Lake and Lake Wingra, Wisconsin, USA.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Values are given for a 500-m buffer. Impervious surface calculations via Method 1 have higher absolute values than Method 2, but relative differences are similar (see Fig. 4).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Dugan, H. A. et al. Long-term chloride concentrations in North American and European freshwater lakes. Sci. Data 4:170101 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.101 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

sdata2017101-isa1.zip (27.8KB, zip)

Acknowledgments

This project was developed through the Global Lake Ecological Observatory Network (GLEON) fellowship program, and was supported by National Science Foundation grants 1137353 and 1137327. Amanda Lindsey and Bethel Steele helped in creating shapefiles for Canadian Lakes. We thank all data providers, including: IISD Experimental Lakes Area, Steven Hamilton and the Kellogg Biological Station LTER, North Temperate Lakes LTER #DEB-1440297, Kawartha Conservation, Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship, Alberta Environment and Parks, Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, John Stoddard and the US Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Geological Survey, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, University of Rhode Island Watershed Watch Program, the Swedish Department of Water and Environment, City of Zurich Water Supply.

Data Citations

  1. Dugan H. 2017. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b473b048846875b721d139416b8fd882

References

  1. Verpoorter C., Kutser T., Seekell D. A. & Tranvik L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. Meybeck M. in Physics and Chemistry of Lakes (eds Lerman A., Imboden, D. M. & Gat J.) 36 (Springer-Verlag, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  3. Thunqvist E.-L. Regional increase of mean chloride concentration in water due to the application of deicing salt. Sci. Total Environ. 325, 29–37 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chapra S. C., Dove A. & Rockwell D. C. Great Lakes chloride trends: Long-term mass balance and loading analysis. J. Great Lakes Res. 35, 272–284 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans C., Monteith D. & Harriman R. Long-term variability in the deposition of marine ions at west coast sites in the UK Acid Waters Monitoring Network: impacts on surface water chemistry and significance for trend determination. Sci. Total Environ. 265, 115–129 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Godwin K. S., Hafner S. D. & Buff M. F. Long-term trends in sodium and chloride in the Mohawk River, New York: the effect of fifty years of road-salt application. Environ. Pollut. 124, 273–281 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Beeton A. M. Eutrophication of the St Lawrence Great Lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 240–254 (1965). [Google Scholar]
  8. Effler S. W. & Driscoll C. T. A chloride budget for Onondaga Lake, New York, USA. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 27, 29–44 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaushal S. S. et al. Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13517–13520 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Panno S. V. et al. Characterization and identification of Na-Cl sources in ground water. Ground Water 44, 176–187 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans C. D., Monteith D. T., Fowler D., Cape J. N. & Brayshaw S. Hydrochloric acid: An overlooked driver of environmental change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 1887–1894 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bäckström M., Karlsson S., Bäckman L., Folkeson L. & Lind B. Mobilisation of heavy metals by deicing salts in a roadside environment. Water Res 38, 720–732 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sibert R. J., Koretsky C. M. & Wyman D. A. Cultural meromixis: Effects of road salt on the chemical stratification of an urban kettle lake. Chem. Geol. 395, 126–137 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. Corsi S. R., Graczyk D. J., Geis S. W., Booth N. L. & Richards K. D. A fresh look at road salt : Aquatic toxicity and water-quality impacts on local, regional, and national scales. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7376–7382 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karraker N. E., Gibbs J. P. & Vonesh J. R. Impacts of Road Deicing Salt on the Demography of Vernal Pool-Breeding Amphibians. Ecol. Appl. 18, 724–734 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chapra S. C., Dove A. & Warren G. J. Long-term trends of Great Lakes major ion chemistry. J. Great Lakes Res. 38, 550–560 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. Shambaugh A. Environmental Implications of Increasing Chloride Levels in Lake Champlain and Other Basin Waters Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation https://anrweb.vt.gov/PubDocs/DEC/WSMD/lakes/docs/lp_chloridereport.pdf (2008).
  18. Swinton M. W., Eichler L. W. & Boylen C. W. Road salt application differentially threatens water resources in Lake George, New York. Lake Reserv. Manag. 31, 20–30 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Müller B. & Gächter R. Increasing chloride concentrations in Lake Constance: characterization of sources and estimation of loads. Aquat. Sci. 74, 101–112 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. Rogora M. et al. Recent trends in chloride and sodium concentrations in the deep subalpine lakes (Northern Italy). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 19013–19026 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dugan H. A. et al. Salting our freshwater lakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 114, 4453–4458 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2016).
  23. Hirsch R. M. & De Cicco L. A. in Techniques and Methods (U.S. Geological Survey, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. Center for Limnology; NTL LTER. North Temperate Lakes LTER: Chemical Limnology of Primary Study Lakes: Major Ions 1981—current. http://dx.doi.org/10.6073/pasta/91fcc6ddf77793be79f88c2b671486fa (2012).
  25. Kleeberg A. in Handbuch Angewandte Limnologie: Grundlagen—Gewässerbelastung—Restaurierung—Aquatische Ökotoxikologie—Bewertung—Gewässerschutz 1–34 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. López-de-Lacalle J. tsoutliers: Detection of Outliers in Time Series. R package version 0.6-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tsoutliers (2016). [Google Scholar]
  27. Hijmans R. J., Cameron S. E., Parra J. L., Jones P. G. & Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  28. Vet R. et al. A global assessment of precipitation chemistry and deposition of sulfur, nitrogen, sea salt, base cations, organic acids, acidity and pH, and phosphorus. Atmos. Environ. 93, 3–100 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. Kelting D. L., Laxson C. L. & Yerger E. C. Regional analysis of the effect of paved roads on sodium and chloride in lakes. Water Res 46, 2749–2758 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Regalado S. A. & Kelting D. L. Landscape level estimate of lands and waters impacted by road runoff in the Adirondack Park of New York State. Environ. Monit. Assess. 187, 510 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Read E. E. K. et al. The importance of lake-specific characteristics for water quality across the continental US. Ecol. Appl. 25, 943–955 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Bivand R. & Rundel C. rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine—Open Source (GEOS). R package version 0.3-21. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=rgeos (2016).
  33. Yang J. S. & Artigas F. J. Estimating Impervious Surfaces Area of Urban Watersheds Using ASTER Data. J. Environ. Informatics 12, 1–8 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  34. Arnold C. L. & Gibbons C. J. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. J. Am. Plan. Assoc 62, 243–258 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  35. Daley M. L., Potter J. D. & McDowell W. H. Salinization of urbanizing New Hampshire streams and groundwater: effects of road salt and hydrologic variability. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc 28, 929–940 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  36. Novotny E. V. & Stefan H. G. Projections of chloride concentrations in urban lakes receiving road de-icing salt. Water Air Soil Pollut. 211, 261–271 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  37. Homer C., Huang C., Yang L., Wylie B. & Coan M. Development of a 2001 National Land-Cover Database for the United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 70, 829–840 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  38. Homer C. et al. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 8, 345–354 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  39. Xian G. et al. Change of impervious surface area between 2001 and 2006 in the conterminous United States. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 77, 758–762 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  40. Rhodes A., Newton R. & Pufall A. Influences of land use on water quality of a diverse New England watershed. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 3640–3645 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nimiroski M. & Waldron M. T. Sources of sodium and chloride in the Scituate Reservoir drainage basin, Rhode Island. (U.S. Geological Survey WRIR 02-4149, 2002).
  42. Eugster M. J. A. & Schlesinger T. osmar: OpenStreetMap and R. http://osmar.r-forge.r-project.org/RJpreprint.pdf (2012). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Dugan H. 2017. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/b473b048846875b721d139416b8fd882

Supplementary Materials

sdata2017101-isa1.zip (27.8KB, zip)

Articles from Scientific Data are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES