Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2005 Mar 2;102(11):3960–3965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500755102

Robust in vitro activity of RebF and RebH, a two-component reductase/halogenase, generating 7-chlorotryptophan during rebeccamycin biosynthesis

Ellen Yeh 1, Sylvie Garneau 1, Christopher T Walsh 1,*
PMCID: PMC554827  PMID: 15743914

Abstract

The indolocarbazole antitumor agent rebeccamycin is modified by chlorine atoms on each of two indole moieties of the aglycone scaffold. These halogens are incorporated during the initial step of its biosynthesis from conversion of l-Trp to 7-chlorotryptophan. Two genes in the biosynthetic cluster, rebF and rebH, are predicted to encode the flavin reductase and halogenase components of an FADH2-dependent halogenase, a class of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of numerous halogenated natural products. Here, we report that, in the presence of O2, chloride ion, and l-Trp as cosubstrates, purified RebH displays robust regiospecific halogenating activity to generate 7-chlorotryptophan over at least 50 catalytic cycles. Halogenation by RebH required the addition of RebF, which catalyzes the NADH-dependent reduction of FAD to provide FADH2 for the halogenase. Maximal rates were achieved at a RebF/RebH ratio of 3:1. In air-saturated solutions, a kcat of 1.4 min–1 was observed for the RebF/RebH system but increased at least 10-fold in low-pO2 conditions. RebH was also able to use bromide ions to generate monobrominated Trp. The demonstration of robust chlorinating activity by RebF/RebH sets up this system for the probing of mechanistic questions regarding this intriguing class of enzymes.

Keywords: enzymology, natural product biosynthesis, flavoenzyme


To date, >3,800 halogenated natural products have been described (1). These natural products include important antibiotics such as vancomycin and chloramphenicol as well as the antitumor agent rebeccamycin (24). In addition to these chlorine-containing compounds, a variety of brominated products has been isolated from marine environments that provides a rich and largely untapped resource for novel compounds (5). In mammals, iodinated T3 and T4 forms of thyroid hormone are halogenated metabolites with key physiological functions (6).

Given the prominence of halogenation among natural products, there has been intense interest in understanding the mechanisms by which these functional groups are incorporated during natural product biosynthesis. The first FADH2-dependent halogenase was cloned from a strain producing chlortetracycline by complementation of a chlorination-deficient mutant (7). Since then, sequencing of numerous gene clusters involved in the biosynthesis of halogenated natural products has identified many additional members of this class. These halogenases mainly carry out chlorination of electron-rich aromatic rings (e.g., β-OH-tyrosine in vancomycin) but are also involved in formation of the dichloroacetyl moiety in chloramphenicol and iodination of orsellinic acid in calicheamicin biosynthesis (2, 3, 8).

Despite the many representatives of this halogenase class and its role in the biosynthesis of medicinally important halogenated aromatic natural products, only a few of these catalysts have been characterized (911). PrnA, the Trp-7-halogenase involved in the formation of pyrrolnitrin, is foremost among FADH2-dependent halogenases that have been described (9, 10). In these studies, van Pée and coworkers (9, 10) established the requirement for a separate flavin reductase to provide reduced FADH2 for the halogenase, in analogy with two-component flavin monooxygenase systems (1214). However, low in vitro activity of this system has precluded more detailed studies, so even a parameter as fundamental as catalytic efficiency has yet to be reported for a FADH2-dependent halogenase, and little is known about the mechanism of halogenation by these enzymes.

Rebeccamycin is an indolocarbazole natural product containing chlorine atoms on each of two indole rings of the scaffold. Because of its inhibition of DNA topoisomerase, it has been explored as a potential therapy against various tumors (1518). Halogenation is functionally significant because removal of the chlorine atoms results in loss of activity in cell antiproliferative assays (19). The fused ring structure of rebeccamycin arises from multistep oxidative condensation of two molecules of l-Trp (2022). Chlorination occurs early in the biosynthetic pathway and involves two genes identified in the biosynthetic cluster: rebF, a predicted NAD(P)H-dependent flavin reductase, and rebH, a putative FADH2-dependent halogenase that shares 55% identity with PrnA (4). In this study, we demonstrate that, in the presence of RebF, RebH catalyzes the regiospecific chlorination of l-Trp to 7-chlorotryptophan during the initial step of rebeccamycin biosynthesis (Fig. 1). The robust activity of this two-component RebF/RebH system provides the first kinetic characterization of a FADH2-dependent halogenase and sets the stage for further investigation of this remarkable class of halogenases as well as subsequent steps in rebeccamycin assembly.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Chlorination of Trp to 7-chlorotryptophan as the initial step in the biosynthesis of rebeccamycin.

Experimental Methods

Materials. l-[14C]Trp was purchased from New England Nuclear. [36Cl]NaCl was purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis). Authentic 7-chlorotryptophan was provided by Robert S. Phillips (University of Georgia, Athens) (23). Other chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.

Cloning, Expression, and Purification of RebF and RebH. The rebF and rebH genes were amplified from genomic DNA isolated from Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes (strain 39243; The American Type Culture Collection). Primers for RebF (5′-GAGGACCATATGACGATCGAGTTCGACAGACCC-3′ and 5′-CGATGTAAGCTTTCATCCCTCTGTCCACACGGC-3′) and RebH (5′-GTACGTCATATGTCCGGCAAGATTGACAAG-3′ and 5′-GTCAGCAAGCTTTCAGCGGCCGTGCTGTGCC-3′) contained NdeI and HindIII restriction sites (italicized) and were cloned into corresponding NdeI/HindIII sites of pET28a (Novagen). The cloned expression vectors were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) (Invitrogen) overexpressing RebF or RebH were grown in Luria–Bertani medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg ml–1). Cells were grown at 30°C to OD600 = 0.5 and then induced with 100 μM isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) and grown for an additional 16 h at 15°C. N-His-tagged proteins were purified by Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography. For preparation of apo-RebF, an additional 2 M potassium bromide/2 M urea wash was performed before elution from Ni-NTA (24). Eluted proteins were further purified by gel-filtration chromatography on HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare). The final storage buffer contained 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) and 10% glycerol.

NADH Oxidation by Flavin Reductase RebF. Oxidation of NAD(P)H to NAD(P)+ was monitored spectrophotometrically by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm (Δε340 = –6,220 M–1·cm–1). For kinetic characterization, 1.0 μM RebF was incubated with 0.025–1.0 mM NADH and 50 μM FAD or FMN in 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) and 10 mM NaCl. Km values for FAD and FMN were obtained by varying concentrations from 0.02 to 12.5 μM in the presence of 0.5 mM NADH. Reactions were monitored at 340 nm by Spectra Max Plus microplate spectrophotometer by using softmax pro 3.1 for data analysis.

Anaerobic Reaction Preparation and Analysis. For the data shown in Fig. 2A, reactions were prepared in a Unilab glove box (Mbraun, Stratham, NH) maintained at <2 ppm O2, as described in ref. 25. Protein samples and all reagents were prepared in O2-free buffer (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.5). l-[14C]Trp (0.5 mM; 10 Ci/mol; 1 Ci = 37 GBq) was incubated with 25 μM RebF and RebH in the presence of 10 mM NADH, 100 μM FAD, and 10 mM NaCl. For labeling with 36Cl, the reaction was prepared with unlabeled l-Trp and 1 mM [36Cl]NaCl (1 mM; 0.5 Ci/mol). Reactions were then removed from the glove box and exposed to O2. Reactions were quenched by addition of one equivalent MeOH and then centrifuged to remove precipitated protein. The supernatant was then analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC on a Vydac (Hesperia, CA) C18 (200 Å, 4.6 × 200 mm) column (1 ml/min; 0–20 min, 0–50% B) (A, H2O/0.1% TFA; B, acetonitrile/0.1% TFA) on a System Gold HPLC (Beckman). Flow-through radioactivity was monitored by using a Radioisotope Detector 171 (Beckman).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Formation of 7-chlorotryptophan by RebF/RebH. (A) Radio-HPLC traces of RebF/RebH reaction products derived from l-[14C]Trp showing time-dependent formation of 7-chlorotryptophan. Product formation requires O2. When chloride ion was provided as [36Cl]NaCl, l-Trp was converted to product containing 36Cl label (trace at the bottom). (B) MALDI MS analysis of the [M + H]+ reaction product is consistent with formation of a monochlorinated Trp with the characteristic 3:1 M/M + 2 isotopic distribution of chlorine. (C) kobs for RebH (6 μM) varies with RebF concentration (0–30 μM). Optimal activity for RebF/RebH is achieved at a RebF/RebH ratio of 3:1.

MALDI MS and NMR Analysis of Product 7-Chlorotryptophan. For large-scale preparation of reaction product, a 5-ml reaction containing 2 mM l-Trp, 20 μM FAD, 50 mM NADH, 30 μM RebH, 120 μM RebF, and 50 mM NaCl was incubated overnight with agitation. The product-TFA salt was purified by HPLC and lyophilized. Authentic 7-chlorotryptophan was purified similarly. The final product and the chemical standard were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS (0.2 mg/ml with saturated 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 1:1 dilution) and 1H-NMR (500 MHz; D2O).

RebF/RebH Enzymatic Assays. Rates for the RebF/RebH reaction were determined by monitoring the conversion of 0.5–20 μM l-[14C]Trp (53 Ci/mol) in the presence of 10 mM NADH, 100 μM FAD, 10 mM NaCl, 1 μM RebH, and 3 μM RebF. Reactions were quenched at 1–10 min with 1 eq MeOH, and protein was removed by centrifugation. For bromination reactions, NaCl was replaced with 100 mM NaBr. The supernatant was developed on C18-silica TLC plates (Sigma) in 10% acetonitrile and exposed 12–16 h on BASIII imager plates (Fuji). Plates were analyzed on a Typhoon 9200 (GE Healthcare). The ratio of l-Trp (Rf = 0.59) and 7-chlorotryptophan (Rf = 0.2) was calculated to determine reaction rates.

Results

Characterization of Flavin Reductase RebF. During the sequencing of the reb cluster, rebF was annotated as a putative flavin: NAD(P)H reductase (4). Enzymes that require reduced flavin cofactors for activity must first generate FADH2 or FMNH2 from reducing equivalents of NADH or NADPH. Although most flavin monooxygenases carry out flavin reduction and substrate oxidation in a single active site, two-component f lavin-dependent monooxygenases have been described that use a separate flavin reductase to catalyze the first step of the catalytic cycle (12, 14). The reduced flavin is believed to diffuse into the active site of the monoxygenase component, because this catalytic cooperation does not appear to depend on protein–protein interactions (1214). In analogy to these two-component flavin monooxygenases, RebF and RebH were proposed to form a two-component halogenase.

RebF was cloned and heterologously expressed in E. coli. The resulting 19.9-kDa protein was purified with 23% bound FAD (data not shown). Apo-protein was prepared by washing with 2 M urea/2 M potassium bromide to release the bound cofactor before elution from the Ni affinity column (24). Oxidation of NAD(P)H to NAD(P)+ was monitored by the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm. In the presence of FAD or FMN, RebF oxidized NADH with kcat of 108 min–1 (Km = 0.7 μM for FAD and 1.3 μM for FMN). NADPH was not accepted for oxidation by RebF. The characterization of RebF as a NADH-dependent flavin reductase then allowed for the investigation of its participation in the halogenase reaction.

Formation of 7-Chlorotryptophan by RebH in Presence of RebF. In addition to the requirement for a flavin reductase to provide reduced flavin cofactor, previous studies of FADH2-dependent halogenases indicated that the reaction also depended on O2 (9). For that reason, RebF/RebH reactions were prepared anaerobically, and O2 was subsequently introduced to initiate the reaction. l-[14C]Trp was used as the substrate to detect the appearance of new products derived from that amino acid. Analysis by radio-HPLC revealed a new product peak that was formed over time when RebF/RebH was incubated with substrate l-Trp, FAD, and NADH (Fig. 2 A). Neither FMN nor NADPH supported product formation (data not shown). In the absence of O2, product formation was also abolished, suggesting that molecular oxygen is a substrate for the halogenase as well. 36Cl was incorporated into the product when chloride ion was provided as [36Cl]NaCl. Mass analysis by MALDI MS gave a [M + H]+ of 239 and 241 in ≈3:1 ratio, consistent with a monochlorinated Trp compound (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the product coeluted with an authentic standard of 7-chlorotryptophan (23). Comparison of 1H-NMR data of the product and authentic 7-chlorotryptophan also confirmed the site of chlorination at position 7 of the indole ring: (D2O, 500 MHz) 7.5 (dd, J = 1, 8 Hz, 1H, H-4), 7.25 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.25 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H, H-6), 7.02 (t, J = 8 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.1 (dd, J = 5, 8 Hz, 1H, Hα), 3.3 (dd, J = 5, 15.2 Hz, 1H, Hβ), and 3.2 (dd, J = 8, 15.2 Hz, 1H, Hβ′).

In the absence of RebF, RebH showed low-level chlorinating activity that may have resulted from low-level contamination by highly active E. coli flavin reductases (26, 27) during heterologous expression and purification. However, rates of product formation were dramatically enhanced with addition of RebF. By varying the ratio of RebF and RebH components, a RebF/RebH ratio of 3:1 was found to be optimal for activity, as shown in Fig. 2C. Subsequent kinetic characterization of RebF and RebH was conducted at this optimal ratio of protein components.

Kinetic Characterization of RebH. Kinetic parameters were determined for the conversion of l-Trp to 7-chlorotryptophan by the halogenase RebH. Reactions were prepared under aerobic conditions and assayed in the presence of FAD, NADH, and various l-Trp concentrations. RebH catalyzed chlorination of l-Trp with a kcat of 1.4 min–1 and a Km for l-Trp of 2.0 μM. A Km for Cl could not be measured because of an undetermined source of chloride contamination in reaction solutions. Because the reaction depends on both FADH2 and O2 as substrates, enzyme activity may be sensitive to the amount of O2 in solution. As shown in Fig. 2 A, 54% of the available l-Trp was converted to 7-chlorotryptophan within 5 min when the reaction was prepared anaerobically and O2 introduced slowly. When the same reaction was prepared in air-saturated solutions, product formation decreased by 10-fold so that only 5% of the substrate was converted in 5 min of reaction (data not shown). The higher reaction rate observed at the lower pO2 condition likely reflects a decrease in adventitious air oxidation of FADH2 released by the reductase RebF. This decreased air oxidation would increase the availability of the reduced cofactor for diffusion into and binding in the halogenase active site. A low pO2 environment may reflect the reducing environment within the cell more accurately and be more favorable for observing the activity of this two-component system that depends on the diffusion of FADH2.

Formation of 7-Bromotryptophan by RebF/RebH. Brominated rebeccamycin products have also been detected in culture broths from the producer L. aerocolonigenes and in genetically reconstituted hosts (28, 29), indicating the ability of RebH halogenase to accept Br in lieu of Cl as the halide substrate. When RebF/RebH activity was assayed in presence of excess bromide, a Trp-derived product was observed with [M + H]+ of 283 and 285 in a 1:1 ratio characteristic of a monobrominated species (Fig. 3). The rate of formation of the brominated product was found to be 0.4 min–1. Neither F nor I were competent for halogenation by RebH (data not shown). In fact, I appeared to inhibit the formation of 7-chlorotryptophan.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Bromination of l-Trp by RebF/RebH. Radio-HPLC of the RebF/RebH reaction supplemented with excess NaBr shows a new l-[14C]Trp-derived product with a retention time greater than that of 7-chlorotryptophan. The [M + H]+ compound mass and a 1:1 M/M + 2 mass ratio observed by MALDI-MS are indicative of a monobrominated Trp.

Discussion

Nature employs several classes of enzymes to catalyze specific halogenation of organic compounds. A recurrent theme in biological halogenation is the use of a peroxide functionality and halide ions (Cl, Br, or I) to introduce halogen atoms. Vanadium-dependent bromoperoxidases, isolated from marine algae, use H2O2 to activate bromide ions abundant in seawater, generating an electrophilic bromine species that is likely coordinated to the active site V5+ (5, 3032). Similarly, organification of iodide in the thyroid gland during thyroxine biosynthesis requires H2O2 to generate an enzyme-bound hypoiodite (3335). Once the reactive oxidized halogen species is formed, the specificity of the subsequent reaction must be controlled. Until the cloning of the chl gene from chlortetracycline (7), heme-dependent haloperoxidases were believed responsible for the halogenation of many natural products now known to involve FADH2-dependent halogenases. After breakdown of a heme Fe-O-Cl intermediate, free HOCl was released (3640). Chlorination by HOCl lacked both substrate specificity and regiospecificity (36, 40, 41). Gene disruption of the haloperoxidase from a number of clusters showed no loss of natural product formation, providing definitive proof against the role of haloperoxidases in the biosynthesis of these halogenated organic compounds (42, 43).

RebH is a member of the FADH2-dependent halogenase superfamily found in scores of NRPS/PKS biosynthetic clusters. Pioneering work in the pyrrolnitrin system has established several basic features of these halogenases (9). First, they depend on the FAD form of flavin cofactors, in particular FADH2 in the reduced state. Second, a separate flavin reductase is required to catalyze the initial reduction of flavin by NAD(P)H. In rebeccamycin, the flavin reductase RebF is encoded within the biosynthetic cluster along with the halogenase RebH. For most FADH2-dependent halogenases, a separate flavin reductase cannot be found in the gene cluster and likely is encoded elsewhere in the genome. A third feature is the requirement for molecular oxygen, consistent with the formation of an FAD-OOH intermediate in the halogenase reaction from FADH2 and O2. This is the key intermediate in the reaction of flavin monooxygenases, in which it acts as an electrophile to hydroxylate aromatic substrates (44).

The reactions leading to chlorination by a two-component halogenase are set forth below.

graphic file with name M1.gif [1]
graphic file with name M2.gif [2]
graphic file with name M3.gif [3]
graphic file with name M4.gif [4]

Overall, a four-electron reduction of O2 is coupled with four-electron oxidation of both NADH and the aromatic substrate. Flavin frequently acts as an electron carrier between NADH and O2. In two-component flavin monoxygenases, FADH2 shuttles electrons from a reductase that oxidizes NAD(P)H to a second protein that ultimately donates electrons from both FADH2 and substrate to O2 forming H2O. Because complex formation between the components has not been detected in any of these systems, the mechanism is thought to involve the transfer of freely diffusing FADH2 between the two active sites (1214). However, the use of two proteins, one to generate FADH2 and the other to catalyze oxidation of the substrate, creates the liability that diffusing FADH2 will be intercepted by O2 adventitiously. Given the kcat values reported here for RebF and RebH in air-saturated solutions and the 3:1 ratio of the components required for optimal activity, ≈230 molecules of FADH2 are generated by the reductase for a single chlorination reaction, a very inefficient usage of the reduced cofactor. Efficient coupling in vivo may be achieved in the lower pO2 environment of the cell because a 10-fold increase in RebH rates was seen under low pO2 conditions.

The paucity of information regarding biosynthetic FADH2-dependent halogenases is in part due to the uncertainty of timing of the halogenation reaction and, consequently, what substrate should be assayed. But it may also be due to the need for both FADH2 and O2 as substrates, which creates competition between nonenzymatic oxidation of FADH2 and productive generation of FAD-OOH by the halogenase. Clearly, kinetic characterization of this two-component halogenase will require maximizing the flux toward productive formation of FAD-OOH in the halogenase active site by conducting reactions at fixed, low pO2 conditions. Evaluation of the affinity of RebF for RebH may also indicate whether transfer of FADH2 depends on free diffusion, as in two-component monooxygenase systems.

After formation of the FAD-OOH intermediate, the mechanism of regiospecific halogenation at C7 of Trp, as represented by reaction 3 above, is not fully understood. It has been suggested that chlorination could result from a typical monooxygenase-type reaction to generate an epoxide intermediate, followed by nucleophilic addition of Cl and dehydration to rearomatize the ring (9). However, as evidenced by heme- and vanadium-dependent haloperoxidases, nature seems to favor formation of an electrophilic R-OX species from R-OOH and halide ions. Free HOCl is unlikely to be the active chlorinating agent generated by RebH as such a reaction would lack the specificity to form 7-chlorotryptophan as the sole reaction product (typically, other positions on the indole ring are more activated for electrophilic aromatic substitution). Also, we did not observe any new products when 1 mM NaOCl was reacted with l-Trp in the presence or absence of RebH (data not shown). Thus, under the enzymatic reaction conditions, OCl/HOCl could not directly chlorinate Trp, nor could it be used by the halogenase to catalyze product formation. Instead, we propose that an FAD-O-Cl could be formed from nucleophilic attack of Cl on the FADH-OOH intermediate (Fig. 4). The unusual regioselectivity demonstrated by both RebH and PrnA could be achieved through a restricted orientation of the bound Trp toward this FAD-O-Cl intermediate in the RebH active site. Detection of such an intermediate would be an exciting addition to the list of chemistries of which this versatile redox cofactor is capable.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Proposed mechanism for halogenation by FADH2-dependent halogenases. After formation of a FAD-OOH intermediate, the reactive chlorine is generated as a proposed FAD-O-Cl intermediate. Chlorination of l-Trp proceeds by attack of the aromatic π electrons on the FAD-O-Cl intermediate in a two-electron mechanism. Abstraction of a proton then generates the final product, 7-chlorotryptophan.

Flavin cofactors undergo both one-electron and two-electron chemistry (4446), so either reaction manifold could be involved in halogen transfer. An FAD-O-Cl intermediate could react via a one-electron mechanism to form ·Cl as the chlorinating species. Photolysis of ROCl to ·Cl and ·RO has been observed (47, 48). However, in vanadium-dependent haloperoxides, a radical-generating reaction has been ruled out in favor of a mechanism generating cationic bromine (30).

More likely, the formation of 7-chlorotryptophan by RebH occurs via a two-electron mechanism through attack of the indole π electrons on an FAD-O-Cl intermediate. This route, as shown in Fig. 4, would lead to a resonance-stabilized iminium- or imine-like transition state and could account for the unusual regiochemistry of chlorination. Abstraction of the proton at C7 could then regenerate the aromaticity of the indole. The demonstration of robust activity in the purified RebF/RebH system provides a starting point for addressing mechanistic questions regarding this biosynthetically important class of FADH2-dependent halogenases.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Robert S. Phillips for providing authentic 7-chlorotryptophan used in these studies. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant GM43998 (to C.T.W.) and by a National Institutes of Health Medical Scientist Training Program Fellowship (to E.Y.).

Author contributions: E.Y. designed research; E.Y. performed research; E.Y. and S.G. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.Y. analyzed data; and E.Y. and C.T.W. wrote the paper.

References

  • 1.Gribble, G. W. (2003) Chemosphere 52, 289–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Wageningen, A. M., Kirkpatrick, P. N., Williams, D. H., Harris, B. R., Kershaw, J. K., Lennard, N. J., Jones, M., Jones, S. J. & Solenberg, P. J. (1998) Chem. Biol. 5, 155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Piraee, M., White, R. L. & Vining, L. C. (2004) Microbiology 150, 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sanchez, C., Butovich, I. A., Brana, A. F., Rohr, J., Mendez, C. & Salas, J. A. (2002) Chem. Biol. 9, 519–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Butler, A. & Carter-Franklin, J. N. (2004) Nat. Prod. Rep. 21, 180–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knaggs, A. R. (2001) Nat. Prod. Rep. 18, 334–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dairi, T., Nakano, T., Aisaka, K., Katsumata, R. & Hasegawa, M. (1995) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59, 1099–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ahlert, J., Shepard, E., Lomovskaya, N., Zazopoulos, E., Staffa, A., Bachmann, B. O., Huang, K., Fonstein, L., Czisny, A., Whitwam, R. E., et al (2002) Science 297, 1173–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keller, S., Wage, T., Hohaus, K., Holzer, M., Eichhorn, E. & van Pee, K. H. (2000) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 2300–2302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Holzer, M., Burd, W., Reissig, H. U. & van Pee, K. H. (2001) Adv. Synth. Catal. 343, 591–595. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wynands, I. & van Pee, K. H. (2004) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 237, 363–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Galan, B., Diaz, E., Prieto, M. A. & Garcia, J. L. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 627–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Valton, J., Filisetti, L., Fontecave, M. & Niviere, V. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 44362–44369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Otto, K., Hofstetter, K., Rothlisberger, M., Witholt, B. & Schmid, A. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186, 5292–5302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prudhomme, M. (2000) Curr. Med. Chem. 7, 1189–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goel, S., Wadler, S., Hoffman, A., Volterra, F., Baker, C., Nazario, E., Ivy, P., Silverman, A. & Mani, S. (2003) Invest. New Drugs 21, 103–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hussain, M., Vaishampayan, U., Heilbrun, L. K., Jain, V., LoRusso, P. M., Ivy, P. & Flaherty, L. (2003) Invest. New Drugs 21, 465–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Langevin, A. M., Weitman, S. D., Kuhn, J. G., Weintraub, S. T., Baruchel, S., Furman, W., Bernstein, M., Blaney, S. & Vietti, T. (2003) J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 25, 526–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pereira, E. R., Belin, L., Sancelme, M., Prudhomme, M., Ollier, M., Rapp, M., Severe, D., Riou, J. F., Fabbro, D. & Meyer, T. (1996) J. Med. Chem. 39, 4471–4477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lam, K. S., Forenza, S., Doyle, T. W. & Pearce, C. J. (1990) J. Ind. Microbiol. 6, 291–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hyun, C. G., Bililign, T., Liao, J. & Thorson, J. S. (2003) Chembiochem. 4, 114–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Onaka, H., Taniguchi, S., Igarashi, Y. & Furumai, T. (2003) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 67, 127–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee, M. & Phillips, R. S. (1992) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2, 1563–1564. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hefti, M. H., Milder, F. J., Boeren, S., Vervoort, J. & van Berkel, W. J. (2003) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1619, 139–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tseng, C. C., Vaillancourt, F. H., Bruner, S. D. & Walsh, C. T. (2004) Chem. Biol. 11, 1195–1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eichhorn, E., van der Ploeg, J. R. & Leisinger, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26639–26646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fieschi, F., Niviere, V., Frier, C., Decout, J. L. & Fontecave, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30392–30400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lam, K. S., Schroeder, D. R., Veitch, J. M., Matson, J. A. & Forenza, S. (1991) J. Antibiot. 44, 934–939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sanchez, C., Zhu, L., Brana, A. F., Salas, A. P., Rohr, J., Mendez, C. & Salas, J. A. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 461–466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soedjak, H. S., Walker, J. V. & Butler, A. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 12689–12696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Martinez, J. S., Carroll, G. L., Tschirret-Guth, R. A., Altenhoff, G., Little, R. D. & Butler, A. (2001) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 3289–3294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Carter-Franklin, J. N. & Butler, A. (2004) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 15060–15066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ohtaki, S., Nakagawa, H., Kimura, S. & Yamazaki, I. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 805–810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Magnusson, R. P., Taurog, A. & Dorris, M. L. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 197–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Magnusson, R. P., Taurog, A. & Dorris, M. L. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 13783–13790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Geigert, J., Neidleman, S. L. & Dalietos, D. J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 2273–2277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Griffin, B. W. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 116, 873–879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Griffin, B. W. & Ashley, P. L. (1984) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 233, 188–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Libby, R. D., Shedd, A. L., Phipps, A. K., Beachy, T. M. & Gerstberger, S. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1769–1775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sundaramoorthy, M., Terner, J. & Poulos, T. L. (1998) Chem. Biol. 5, 461–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ramakrishnan, K., Oppenhuizen, M. E., Saunders, S. & Fisher, J. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 3271–3277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Facey, S. J., Gross, F., Vining, L. C., Yang, K. & van Pee, K. H. (1996) Microbiology 142, 657–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kirner, S., Krauss, S., Sury, G., Lam, S. T., Ligon, J. M. & van Pee, K. H. (1996) Microbiology 142, 2129–2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Massey, V. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22459–22462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bruice, T. C. (1980) Acc. Chem. Res. 13, 256–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miura, R. (2001) Chem. Rec. 1, 183–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Molina, M. J., Ishiwata, T. & Molina, L. T. (1980) J. Phys. Chem. 84, 821–826. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Thelen, M. A., Felder, P., Frey, J. G. & Huber, J. R. (1993) J. Phys. Chem. 97, 6220–6225. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES