Abstract
As a major diarrheagenic human pathogen, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) produce attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions, characterized by the formation of actin pedestals, on mammalian cells. A bacterial T3SS effector NleL from EHEC O157:H7 was recently shown to be a HECT-like E3 ligase in vitro, but its biological functions and host targets remain elusive. Here, we report that NleL is required to effectively promote EHEC-induced A/E lesions and bacterial infection. Furthermore, human c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs) were identified as primary substrates of NleL. NleL-induced JNK ubiquitylation, particularly mono-ubiquitylation at the Lys 68 residue of JNK, impairs JNK’s interaction with an upstream kinase MKK7, thus disrupting JNK phosphorylation and activation. This subsequently suppresses the transcriptional activity of activator protein-1 (AP-1), which modulates the formation of the EHEC-induced actin pedestals. Moreover, JNK knockdown or inhibition in host cells complements NleL deficiency in EHEC infection. Thus, we demonstrate that the effector protein NleL enhances the ability of EHEC to infect host cells by targeting host JNK, and elucidate an inhibitory role of ubiquitylation in regulating JNK phosphorylation.
Author summary
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) can cause attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions to form in the colons of animals and humans, contributing to severe bacterial infection. NleL, an E3 ubiquitin ligase from EHEC O157:H7 is one of the bacterial type III secretion effectors that may be involved in the regulation of A/E lesions. However, NleL’s exact host targets and the detailed mechanistic actions are still unclear. Here, we report that the effector protein NleL effectively promotes EHEC-induced A/E lesions and bacterial infection by targeting the host JNK protein. Specifically, we find that NleL-mediated JNK ubiquitylation abolishes phosphorylation and activation of host JNK, subsequently suppressing the host JNK/AP-1 signaling pathway to favor the formation of EHEC-mediated actin pedestals on the surface of mammalian cells. Collectively, our work has not only discovered the A/E lesion-promoting function of NleL during EHEC infection, but also revealed a novel regulatory mechanism of host JNK protein.
Introduction
EHEC is a globally spread, pathogenic Escherichia coli that infects animals and humans [1,2]. Particularly, O157:H7, as the most prominent serotype in the EHEC group, is a leading cause of diarrhea or hemorrhagic colitis in humans [3]. These pathogens belong to a distinct family of enteric bacteria that cause marked cytoskeletal changes and form unique attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions on intestinal epithelium [4,5]. A/E lesions are characterized by effacement of microvilli, intimate adherence between the bacterium and the host cell membrane, and the generation of actin pedestals, polymerized actin structures beneath the adherent bacteria [2]. Although the specific functions of actin pedestals are currently unclear [6], many studies suggest that the capability of A/E pathogens to form actin pedestals correlates with their ability to cause disease in hosts [7–9]. The type III protein secretion system (T3SS), as well as additional EHEC effector proteins, were reported to be involved in actin pedestal formation [10–12], but it remains incompletely understood how pedestal formation can be modulated.
Although the ubiquitin (Ub) system is exclusive to eukaryotes, prokaryotic bacteria have produced many E3 ligase-like effectors [13,14]. Recently, a bacterial T3SS effector NleL (Non-Lee-encoded effector ligase; also named EspX7) from EHEC O157:H7 was shown to be a HECT-like E3 ligase in vitro, with Cys753 as the catalytic site (Fig 1A) [15]. Later biochemical work revealed that NleL interacts with human E2 UbcH7 and is capable of assembling heterotypic Ub chains in vitro [16–18]. While NleL has been proposed to modulate EHEC-induced actin-pedestal formation [19], NleL’s specific host targets and functions in EHEC infection remain elusive.
In this study, we have identified human JNK as the first substrate of the bacterial E3 ligase NleL. The JNK (also known as stress-activated protein kinase, SAPK) family includes three highly homologous isoforms: ubiquitously expressed JNK1 and JNK2, and tissue-specific JNK3 [20]. JNKs are phosphorylated and activated by upstream kinases and regulate a wide range of cellular functions [21]. However, little is known about post-translational modifications other than phosphorylation regulating JNK functions. Here, we report that JNK proteins are ubiquitylated and inactivated by a bacterial effector NleL in EHEC infection, which promotes EHEC-induced A/E lesion formation and infection.
Results
NleL enhances adherence of EHEC O157:H7 to mammalian cells
To evaluate the effect of NleL on EHEC infection, a nleL-deletion mutant (ΔnleL) was first constructed by chromosomally inactivating the nleL gene in the parental EHEC O157:H7 Sakai strain (RIMD 0509952) as described previously [22]. Deletion of nleL has no effect on the growth of EHEC in culture medium (S1A Fig). We then assessed the ability of EHEC strains to infect mammalian cells. As a hallmark of EHEC infection, bacteria closely attach to cultured mammalian cells [23]. As shown, deletion of nleL from EHEC significantly reduced bacterial attachment to mammalian cells. More importantly, complementation of the nleL-deletion strain with wild-type NleL (ΔnleL + pNleL), but not the enzymatically-dead NleL mutant C753A (where the active site Cys at position 753 is replaced with Ala) (ΔnleL + pC753A), effectively restored the strong adherence of EHEC to host cells (Fig 1B and 1C). These data indicate that the bacterial effector NleL enhances the ability of EHEC to attach to mammalian cells in a manner dependent on its E3 ligase activity.
NleL interacts with human JNK1 in vitro and in vivo
To identify the host targets of NleL, a human ORFs library was screened by a yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system with full-length NleL as the bait. A cDNA encoding human JNK1, Mapk8, was identified in the Y2H screen (S1B Fig). A series of assays were then carried out to confirm the interaction of NleL with JNK1. Both wild-type NleL and the mutant C753A (also NleL-CA) readily co-immunoprecipitated with JNK1, suggesting NleL could form a complex with JNK1 independent of its E3 activity (Fig 1D and 1E and S1C Fig). A GST pull-down assay with the recombinant proteins confirmed that JNK1 can directly interact with NleL or its C753A mutant in vitro (Fig 1F). Compared to NleL170–782, a truncation mutant of NleL frequently used in structural or in vitro biochemical analyses [15,17], full-length NleL was shown to interact with JNK1 with significantly higher affinity (Fig 1G and S1D Fig), suggesting that the N-terminal unordered region of NleL might be involved in the interaction with JNK1. Moreover, we further demonstrated that endogenous JNKs interact with secreted NleL from EHEC in the infected mammalian cells (Fig 1H). Altogether, NleL interacts with host protein JNK1, providing a physical basis for their potential functional interplay.
NleL ubiquitylates human JNK1
We next asked whether the interaction between NleL and host JNK might cause JNK ubiquitylation. As shown in Fig 2A, infection with wild-type EHEC O157:H7 increased the ubiquitylation of JNK, but infection with the ΔnleL strain had little or no impact on JNK ubiquitylation. Moreover, complementation of ΔnleL with wild-type NleL (but not the C753A mutant) effectively promoted JNK ubiquitylation in the infected cells. Thus, NleL could induce JNK ubiquitylation in the EHEC-infected host cells.
Although NleL170-782 was sufficient to mediate the assembly of poly-ubiquitin (poly-Ub) chains in vitro [15,16], the full-length form of NleL was used for all subsequent ubiquitylation assays and functional assays because of its stronger interaction with JNK1 and its intact E3 activity in vitro and in vivo (S2A and S2B Fig). Wild-type NleL, but not C753A, was found to efficiently promote mono- and poly-ubiquitylation of JNK1 in vivo and in vitro, depending on its E3 activity (Fig 2B–2D). Thus, these results established human JNK1 as the substrate for NleL.
NleL was previously shown to assemble Lys 6 and/or Lys 48 linked poly-Ub chains in vitro, while auto-ubiquitylation of NleL occurred preferentially via other Ub linkages [15,16]. Here, we found that NleL-catalyzed ubiquitin chains on JNK1 were primarily linked via Lys 27, Lys 29 and Lys 33 (K27, K29 and K33) linkages, especially the K29 linkage (S2C and S2D Fig). As shown in Fig 2E, NleL readily modified JNK1 with mono-Ub and K29-linked Ub chains, which can be completely removed by Usp2cc, the catalytic core of human ubiquitin-specific protease 2 (USP2). Our data also indicated that several E2s, particularly UbcH7, could support NleL-mediated JNK1 ubiquitylation in cells (S3A Fig).
NleL promotes mono- and poly-ubiquitylation of JNK1 at different sites
We next mapped potential ubiquitylation sites in JNK1. JNK1α1, as the canonical isoform of human JNK1, contains 29 lysine residues. Trypsinolysis of ubiquitin conjugation yields signature “diGly remnants”, which could be enriched with anti-diGly monoclonal antibody for mass spectrometry (MS) analysis [24,25]. MS analysis of JNK1 purified from NleL-expressing 293T cells identified 6 diGly-containing peptides, which corresponded to ubiquitylation at Lys residues 68, 166, 250, 251, 265, and 308 (Fig 2F). The other five ubiquitylation sites in JNK1 (K140, K153, K203, K222, and K236) were identified by protein-protein docking analysis. Therefore, 11 Lys residues of JNK1 were the putative ubiquitylation sites for NleL (Fig 2G).
To further pinpoint the major Lys residues of JNK1 for NleL-induced ubiquitylation, in vivo ubiquitylation assays were performed with JNK1 mutants bearing Lys-to-Arg substitutions at each potential ubiquitylation site. Single Lys-to-Arg substitution on each of three sites (K153R, K222R or K265R) markedly attenuated NleL-induced JNK1 poly-ubiquitylation (Fig 2H and S3B and S3C Fig). Moreover, combined mutation of these three sites (K153/222/265R, 3KR) significantly abolished NleL-induced poly-ubiquitylation of JNK1 (Fig 2I). On the other hand, the K68R substitution alone completely abolished mono-ubiquitylation of JNK1 by NleL in vivo and in vitro, while the 3KR mutant was still clearly mono-ubiquitylated (Fig 2J–2L). Thus, four Lys residues (K68, K153, K222 and K265) of JNK1 were established as the major NleL-associated ubiquitylation sites, with the K68 residue predominantly responsible for mono-ubiquitylation.
NleL-induced ubiquitylation of JNK1 abolishes its phosphorylation
It has been established that activation of JNK signaling constitutes an early cellular response to bacterial infection [26,27]. We next investigated whether NleL functionally regulates this JNK role. As shown in Fig 3A and 3B, while wild-type EHEC induced slight phosphorylation of endogenous JNK in mammalian cells, infection by ΔnleL strain elicited much stronger JNK phosphorylation. Complementation of the ΔnleL strain with wild-type NleL restored the EHEC inhibitory effect on JNK phosphorylation, but the C753A-mutant–complemented ΔnleL strain did not (Fig 3A). Additionally, TNFα stimulation did not induce JNK phosphorylation when the mammalian cells were infected by the EHEC overexpressing wild-type NleL (but not C753A) (Fig 3B). These results prompted us to further investigate whether NleL alone is sufficient to suppress JNK phosphorylation.
Indeed, overexpression of wild-type NleL, but not NleL C753A, efficiently reduced the basal phosphorylation level of JNK (Fig 3C and 3E). Even when the cells were stimulated by TNFα at either low (1.0 ng/ml) or high (10.0 ng/ml) concentration, wild-type NleL significantly suppressed JNK phosphorylation (Fig 3C and 3D). Thus, the E3 ligase activity of NleL is sufficient to suppress JNK phosphorylation in host cells.
We further investigated the relevance of NleL-induced ubiquitylation to JNK1 phosphorylation. In the presence of wild-type NleL (but not C753A), JNK1 was ubiquitylated efficiently but poorly phosphorylated, suggesting that NleL-mediated JNK1 ubiquitylation might adversely impact JNK1 phosphorylation (Fig 3F). Moreover, a JNK kinase assay with recombinant c-Jun as the substrate revealed that the E3 activity of NleL markedly impaired the total kinase activity of JNK1 (Fig 3G). We then tried to explore the roles of JNK1 mono-ubiquitylation at the K68 residue and poly-ubiquitylation at other sites (K153, K222 and K265) in suppressing JNK1 phosphorylation. As shown in Fig 3H, NleL almost completely abolished TNFα-induced phosphorylation of wild-type JNK1 as well as the 3KR mutant; however, NleL had only negligible effects on the phosphorylation of the JNK1 K68R mutant. In addition, NleL had no effect on the phosphorylation of p38 or Erk, two other members of the MAPK superfamily (Fig 3I). Therefore, NleL-induced JNK1 ubiquitylation, particularly mono-ubiquitylation of K68, specifically inhibited JNK1 phosphorylation.
NleL also targets other host JNK proteins (JNK2 and JNK3)
JNK family proteins share over 90% sequence homology to each other (Fig 4A and S4 Fig), including a conserved Lys 68 residue. We next asked whether NleL might also target JNK2 or JNK3, the other two members of the JNK family. Binding assays confirmed that NleL indeed interacted with JNK2 and JNK3 (Fig 4B and 4C). NleL, but not C753A, effectively catalyzed ubiquitylation of JNK2 and JNK3 (Fig 4D and S5A–S5C Fig), and inhibited their phosphorylation as well (Fig 4E and S5D Fig). Furthermore, similar to JNK1, ubiquitylation of JNK2/3 by NleL was negatively correlated with JNK2/3 phosphorylation and activation (Fig 4F and 4G). Thus, NleL appeared to target all the members of JNK family.
NleL-induced ubiquitylation at Lys 68 residue of JNK suppresses the interaction between JNK and MKK7
Currently, two MAP2Ks, MKK4 and MMK7, are known to phosphorylate and activate JNK proteins, with MKK7 being more specific to JNK [28]. It is natural to speculate that NleL-induced ubiquitylation might suppress JNK phosphorylation by either inhibiting the kinase activity of MKK7 or disrupting the interaction between MKK7 and JNK. Since NleL had little or no effect on the phosphorylation of MKK7 (Fig 5A), we proceeded to explore the latter possibility. Usually, JNK1 or JNK2 interacts with MKK7 in host cells. NleL readily reduced MKK7 association with JNKs, but the C753A mutant had little effect (Fig 5B and 5C and S6A and S6B Fig), suggesting that NleL impairs the MKK7-JNK interaction independent of direct competition against MKK7. We also ruled out the possibility that NleL might obstruct MKK4 phosphorylation or MKK4-JNK association (Fig 5D and S6C Fig). Moreover, NleL disrupted the recruitment of wild-type JNK1 to MKK7, but had no effect on the interaction of K68R mutant with MKK7, although wild-type JNK1 and its K68R mutant had the same ability to interact with MKK7 (Fig 5E and 5F). Thus, the K68 residue of JNK1 is required for NleL to suppress the MKK7-JNK interaction.
Since E. coli do not have the ubiquitin system, NleL should not conjugate Ub to JNK1 in bacterial cells. If NleL could mediate modifications in addition to ubiquitylation, it could still potentially modify and inactivate JNK1 when co-expressed with JNK1 in E.coli. However, we found that MKK7 readily phosphorylated purified JNK1 that was co-expressed with either GST-tagged NleL or GST alone in the E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain (Fig 5G). These data suggested that NleL did not inactivate JNK1 through other post-translational modifications.
Altogether, we conclude that NleL-induced ubiquitylation at the K68 residue of JNK1 suppresses the phosphorylation of JNK1, through disrupting the JNK1-MKK7 interaction.
NleL-induced JNK ubiquitylation impairs host JNK/AP-1 signaling
We found that NleL-mediated JNK inactivation was independent of NF-κB signaling (S7A Fig). Next, we examined the possible effects of NleL on downstream of JNK. As expected, wild-type NleL suppressed the basal-level phosphorylation of endogenous c-Jun, a bona fide physiological substrate of JNK, while the C753A mutant did not (Fig 6A). Immunofluorescence microscopy analysis also revealed that EGFP-tagged NleL, but not EGFP, markedly reduced c-Jun phosphorylation (Fig 6B and S7B Fig). Consistently, overexpression of NleL (but not C753A) impaired TNFα-stimulated phosphorylation of c-Jun (Fig 6C). However, depletion of Jnk1/2 using short hairpin RNAs in mammalian cells almost completely abolished the inhibitory effect of NleL on c-Jun phosphorylation (Fig 6C). Therefore, NleL inhibits c-Jun phosphorylation by targeting JNK proteins.
As c-Jun is a major component of the AP-1 transcription factor [29], we next investigated the regulation of AP-1 activity by NleL. An AP-1 luciferase reporter assay showed that wild-type NleL, but not C753A, suppressed AP-1 activity in cells (Fig 6D and S7C and S7D Fig). AP-1 is known to regulate the expression of a large number of genes, e.g. cyclin D1 (CCND1) [30]. As expected, the basal expression of CCND1 in mammalian cells was down-regulated by NleL (but not C753A) (Fig 6E). Consistently, NleL also diminished JNK phosphorylation and CCND1 expression induced by different stimulators (Fig 6F and 6G and S7E and S7F Fig). These results suggest that the E3 activity of NleL is required to suppress AP-1 activity and the expression of AP-1 target genes.
Based on previous work by multiple groups [4,5,31], some AP-1 targets (e.g. CD44, TPM1, ARPC1B and EZR) are known to be important for the formation of EHEC-induced pedestals. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was performed to characterize the potential interplay among the actin-associated proteins targeted by AP-1 and the host proteins identified in EHEC actin pedestals (Fig 6H). The data strongly suggested an emerging role of AP-1 signaling in regulating the formation of EHEC actin pedestals. Furthermore, we found that ectopically expressed NleL suppressed the phosphorylation of VSAP (Fig 6I), one of the critical components in actin pedestals that was recently reported to be modulated by JNK/AP-1 signaling [32]. Meanwhile, CCND1, another AP-1 target protein shown above to be down-regulated by NleL, also interacts with AP-1 actin-associated targets and EHEC pedestal proteins (Fig 6H). Thus, NleL might promote the formation of EHEC actin pedestals by modulating the host JNK/AP-1 pathway.
JNKs are the major targets of NleL in promoting EHEC-induced A/E lesions and EHEC infection
We next explored the role of NleL on the formation of EHEC actin pedestals. Compared to the wild-type EHEC strain, deletion of nleL from EHEC reduced actin-pedestal formation on mammalian cells (Fig 7A). Complementation of ΔnleL strain with NleL, but not C753A, significantly restored the EHEC pedestal-forming abilities (Fig 7A and 7B). On the other hand, Jnk1/2 depletion in HeLa cells promoted actin-pedestal formation by each of the EHEC strains. Additionally, ΔnleL and wild-type EHEC had similar pedestal-forming abilities on Jnk1/2-silenced host cells (Fig 7A and 7B). Thus, NleL promoted the formation of EHEC actin pedestals through targeting host JNKs.
C. rodentium has been used as an alternative approach to study EHEC. However, differing from our findings on the role of NleL in EHEC infection, NleL-deficiency was found to have no effect on the ability of C. rodentium to form actin pedestals and attach to HeLa cells or mice colon (S8 and S9 Fig). Instead, overexpression of EHEC NleL in the ΔnleL C. rodentium suppressed the ability of C. rodentium to attach to HeLa cells and form actin pedestals. Thus, C. rodentium was not a suitable model system to study NleL.
As an A/E pathogen, the pedestal-forming ability of EHEC is considered to correlate with its capability to colonize host [4]. Caco-2 is a human colorectal epithelial cell line that can form an epithelial cell monolayer when cultured for 6 days; continued Caco-2 monolayers growth for 21 days can become differentiated with a brush border that more closely resembles human intestinal epithelium [33–35]. We next performed EHEC infection assays on 6-day-old and 21-day-old Caco-2 monolayers. NleL increased the ability of EHEC to colonize Caco-2 monolayers in a manner dependent on NleL’s E3 ligase activity. Moreover, treatment of Caco-2 with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 effectively rescued the capability of the ΔnleL strain to attach to the Caco-2 monolayer (Fig 7C and S10A and S10B Fig). Similar results were also observed in HeLa cells (S11 Fig). We additionally observed EHEC-induced A/E lesions on 21-day-old Caco-2 monolayers (Fig 7D). Wild-type EHEC (but not ΔnleL) caused A/E lesions on 21-day-old Caco-2 monolayers, marked by microvillus damage. Complementation of the ΔnleL strain with wild-type NleL, but not the C753A mutant, restored the EHEC A/E lesion-forming ability; SP600125 treatment also rescued the ability of ΔnleL to form A/E lesions on the Caco-2 monolayer. These data suggested that the suppression of JNK1/2 functions in host cells could compensate for nleL-deletion-caused loss of the EHEC ability to colonize the host and form A/E lesions. JNK proteins are thus identified as the critical host targets for NleL to promote EHEC O157:H7 infection (Fig 7E).
Discussion
In this work, we have demonstrated that NleL, a bacterial effector and HECT-like E3 ubiquitin ligase from EHEC O157:H7, is critically involved in promoting actin-pedestal formation during EHEC infection. Notably, this finding is different from a previous report by Piscatelli et al., in which NleL was shown to down-regulate the EHEC-induced formation of actin pedestals [19]. If NleL down-regulates actin-pedestal formation in infection as suggested by Piscatelli et al., the presence of NleL should have disrupted bacterial attachment to the host cells. However, results from the same study by Piscatelli et al. indicated that EHEC NleL, reintroduced into the nleL-deleted C. rodentium, was actually required for efficient infection in vivo. Further work is needed to clearly understand the discrepancy between our findings and the findings of Piscatelli et al.
As described above, C. rodentium cannot be a suitable surrogate for EHEC O157:H7 to study NleL. Multiple studies have indicated that EHEC can trigger actin-pedestal formation in host cells in ways differing from C. rodentium [36–38]. While EHEC O157 uses the bacterial effector Tir and TccP adaptor protein to trigger actin polymerization, C. rodentium relies on the phosphorylation of Tir Y471 and the host protein Nck. This may partially account for why the NleLs from these two pathogens have very different effects on actin-pedestal formation, despite their high homology. Given that EHEC NleL targets and suppresses the JNK/AP-1 pathway, it is likely that NleL plays roles in the later stages, rather than the triggering stage, of actin polymerization. Further work is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying why NleL has different roles in these two bacteria. On the other hand, we found that the differentiated Caco-2 monolayers (grown for 21 days) could be used as an in vitro infection model to study A/E lesions. Caco-2 monolayers can mimic human colonic epithelium for EHEC infection, providing an alternative approach to in vivo infection.
Different Ub chain linkages have different impacts on targeted proteins (e.g. K48- or K63-linked Ub chains usually cause protein degradation) [39–41]. Here, NleL primarily assembled mono-Ub and K29-linked Ub chains on JNK, suggesting a non-proteolytic function of NleL-induced JNK ubiquitylation. Instead, NleL-induced mono-ubiquitylation at K68 of JNK, but not the poly-ubiquitylation at other residues, disrupted the interaction between JNK and MKK7. Although a recent report showed that JNK1 binds MKK7 using multiple binding sites [42], K68 of JNK1 is not in the MKK7-JNK1 binding interface. Other mechanisms, such as those involving allostery, may underlie how JNK1 mono-ubiquitylation disrupts the MKK7-JNK1 interaction.
NleL-mediated JNK mono-ubiquitination appeared to drastically suppress JNK activity, although the mono-ubiquitylated sub-population of JNK1 seemed limited (5% ~ 10% of all cellular JNK1). Currently there are two accepted explanations: 1) cellular proteins can exist in different subcellular populations, so targeted ubiquitylation of a particular subpopulation can be sufficient to generate significant impacts on a specific pathway; 2) NleL-induced JNK1 ubiquitylation should be a dynamic process balanced by removal of ubiquitin by deubiquitylating enzymes (DUBs), as there are plenty of DUBs in mammalian cells [43–45]. In other words, although only part of JNK were observed to be modified by NleL, it is highly possible that most of the JNK molecules undergo NleL-mediated ubiquitylation and then deubiquitylation by DUBs.
The JNKs are master regulators in mammalian cells [46]. It is well established that JNKs are phosphorylated by upstream kinases and then activate downstream targets. However, little was known about the posttranslational modifications other than phosphorylation that might occur on JNKs until recently, when several ubiquitylation and acetylation sites of endogenous JNKs were uncovered by proteomic analyses [24,47,48]. Whether these potential modifications might impact the functions of JNKs remains poorly understood. We thus demonstrate for the first time that ubiquitylation of JNKs by the bacterial effector NleL negatively regulates the function of JNKs. It will be intriguing to investigate whether an unknown endogenous E3 ligase might exist to catalyze the ubiquitylation of JNKs and regulate JNK signaling in mammalian cells.
Worldwide, outbreaks of EHEC O157:H7 infection constitute constant and serious threats to human population and live stocks, without effective treatments [49]. Antibiotic therapy is generally contraindicated as it may promote expression of Stx toxin protein and increase the risk of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome (HUS) [50–52]. Only supportive care can be provided for the infected patients who have developed HUS. Thus, a diversity of treatment and prevention strategies should be developed to protect against EHEC. As NleL promotes EHEC infection by suppressing host JNK, disrupting the NleL-JNK interaction may represent a novel strategy against EHEC O157:H7 infections.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
All animal use procedures were in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th edition, National Research Council, 2011), approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol number SIBCB-S330-1512) of Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Plasmids, antibodies, and reagent
DNAs for NleL amplified from the genomic DNA of E. coli O157:H7 Sakai strain was inserted into pCDNA3.0 and pEGFP-C1 for mammalian expression, and pGEX-4T-1 for recombinant expression in E. coli. NleL DNA was also ligated into the pTRC99A vector for complementation in EHEC (under the trc promoter; pTRC99A is kindly provided by Dr. Xueli Zhang from Tianjin institute of industrial biotechnology, Chinese academy of sciences). Genes for encoding JNK1α1, JNK2α2 (kindly provided by Dr. Jinzhang Zeng from Xiamen University, China), JNK3α2 (Addgene #13759) and MKK7 (Addgene #14623) were cloned to pCDNA3.0 vector with a C-terminal Flag tag (or HA tag), and pET28a vector with 6× His tag. AP-1 luciferase reporter plasmid was a gift from Dr. Jine Yang (Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China). Plasmids expressing HA-tagged Ub and its mutants were described previously [53]. All the point mutations were generated by using the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) according to manufacturer’s protocol. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
Antibodies for JNK1 (2C6) (#3708), phospho-SAPK/JNK (81E11) (#4668), phospho-SAPK/JNK (G9) (#9255), phospho-c-Jun (54B3) (#2361), phospho-c-Jun (#9261), caspase-3 (#9662), VASP (9A2) (#3132) and phospho-VASP (Ser157) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-JNK2 antibody (EP1595Y) (ab76125), anti-MEK7 antibody (EP1455Y) (ab52618), anti-JNK1/2/3 antibody (ab179461) and anti-MEK7 (phospho S271 + T275) (ab4762) were purchased from Abcam. Rabbit anti-HA antibody (H6908), mouse monoclonal anti-Flag antibody (F1804), and Anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (A2220) were from Sigma. Other antibodies were purchased from BD pharmingen for anti-JNK1 (551197), Santa Cruz Biotechnology for anti-ubiquitin (P4D1), Bioword for anti-c-Jun (G237), Absci for anti-MKK4 (#AB21132) and anti-phospho-MKK4 (Ser80) (#AB11177), HangZhou HuaAn Biotechnology for anti-His6 tag (M0812-3), Proteintech for mouse anti-Cyclin D1 (60186-1-Ig), rabbit anti-Flag tag (20543-1-AP) and mouse anti-GAPDH (60004-1-Ig). Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma if not otherwise indicated: PS-1145 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ATP (Thermo Scientific Fermentas). JNK inhibitor SP600125 (S1460) was from Selleck. HeLa, Caco-2 and HEK293T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). All cell culture products were from Corning.
Cell culture and transfection
HEK293T, HeLa, Caco-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2.0 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. Cells were maintained in 5.0% CO2 at 37°C. Transfections were carried out with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Bacteria culture and manipulation
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 Sakai strain (RIMD 0509952) and C. rodentium (CR) strain DBS100 (ATCC 51459) were used as wild-type strains. These bacteria were commonly cultured at 37°C LB broth. Deletion of nleL from EHEC O157:H7 genome was achieved through standard homologous recombination, as reported previously [22]. For CR, the nleL-deleted mutant and escR-deleted mutant had been constructed through a homologous recombination method “Gene doctoring” [54,55]. The mutants were verified by PCR and DNA sequencing. For rescue assay, the ΔnleL strain was transformed with plasmid encoding wild-type Flag-tagged NleL or its C753A mutant.
Bacterial infection of mammalian cells
The infection was performed as described before with slight modifications [56,57]. Briefly, EHEC or CR strains were cultured overnight in 2 × YT (16.0 g/L tryptone, 10.0 g/L yeast extract, 5.0 g/L NaCl) medium without shaking at 37°C. Bacterial cultures were then diluted by 1:40 with serum-free DMEM medium, and cultured for an additional 3 ~ 4 h at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 to induce the expression of type III secretion system before infection. For the complementation assay in EHEC or CR, the medium was added with 1.0 mM Isopropyl-B-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Bacterial cells were then collected and suspended in PBS. After measuring the O.D. of cultured bacteria, infections were performed with mammalian cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100:1 or 20:1, if not indicated otherwise, with a centrifugation at 800 g for 10 min, and then proceeded with incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 ~ 3 h. After that, cells were washed three times and further cultured in fresh DMEM medium for another 2.5 ~ 5 h. Then the infected cells were subjected to immunofluorescence assay or IB analyses with indicated antibodies.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins
E. coli BL21 (DE3) strains harboring the corresponding recombinant plasmids were grown in LB medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. Protein expression was induced overnight at 16°C with 0.3 mM IPTG when OD600 reached 0.6 ~ 0.8. To purify His6-tagged proteins, bacteria were harvested and lysed in lysis buffer containing 50mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 300 mM NaCl, 40 mM imidazole and 5.0 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, and then proteins were purified with affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA beads (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. For GST-fusion proteins, purifications were performed by affinity chromatography using Glutathione Sepharose Fast Flow beads (GE Healthcare). Eluted proteins were further dialyzed overnight at 4°C. Recombinant proteins were concentrated and then frozen-stored in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 300 mM NaCl and 15% Glycerol (V/V). Protein concentrations were determined using Bradford colorimetric assays, with their protein purities examined with SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Blue staining.
Gene knockdown
Nucleotide sequences for the human Jnk1/2-specific shRNAs used were described before [58]. For stable knockdown of Jnk1/2, lentiviral particles harboring specific shRNA expression vector (pLKO.1; Sigma-Aldrich) were produced by transfection of HEK293FT cells with the shRNA expression plasmid and lentiviral packaging mix. Target cells (HEK293T and HeLa) were incubated with the viral supernatant in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma) and selected with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Clontech).
In vitro ubiquitylation assay
As previously described with minor modifications [59], in vitro ubiquitylation assays were carried out in a 30 μl reaction system containing E1 (100 ng), His6-tagged UbcH7 (200 ng), GST-NleL or C753A (500 ng), Flag-JNK1 (500 ng) and ubiquitin (1.0 μg) in ubiquitylation buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 5.0 mM MgCl2, 2.0 mM ATP, 1.0 mM DTT) at 37°C for 60 min. After the reaction was terminated by adding one-tenth volume of 10 × SDS sample buffer, the resulted mixtures were boiled and then subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by IB analysis with indicated antibodies.
In vivo ubiquitylation assay
In vivo ubiquitylation were also carried out as described previously [60]. Cells were collected and lysed in denaturing RIPA buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% Triton X-100, 1.0% sodium deoxycholate and 0.1% SDS supplemented with 1.0% protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Cell lysates were then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10 min, 4°C. Following overnight incubation of anti-Flag beads with cell lysate at 4°C, the beads was washed five times with RIPA buffer. Finally the beads were boiled in SDS sample buffer and subjected to IB analysis with indicated antibodies.
Immunoprecipitation
HEK293T cells in 6 cm dish were transfected with 5.0 μg pCDNA3-Flag-JNK1 and cultured for 24 h. Cells were then lysed in IP buffer (containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% Triton X-100), and centrifuged (15,000g) for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatants were then subjected to IP with anti-Flag M2 beads to enrich Flag-JNK1. Then Flag-JNK1 was eluted by using 3 × Flag peptides (150 μg/ml in PBS) at 4°C for 30min. The eluted protein was verified by Coomassie Blue staining of SDS-PAGE gels.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and GST pull-down assay
For Co-IP assay, 24 h after transfection with indicated plasmids, HEK293T cells were lysed in Triton X-100 buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) plus 1% protease inhibitor cocktail at 4°C for 1 h. The corresponding antibody-conjugated Sepharose beads were added into the lysates supernatant. Following incubation overnight, the beads were washed five times (10 min each). For GST pull-down assay, purified GST-NleL, His-JNKs or cell lysate (appropriate volume) were mixed in total 400 μL reaction system (50 mM Tris-Cl at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA) at 4°C for 6 h. The beads were then pelleted and washed for 5 times (10 min incubation at 4°C for each washing). Then the recovered beads were boiled in 1× SDS-PAGE loading buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Coomassie Blue staining or IB with indicated antibodies.
Immunofluorescence and microscopy
For immunofluorescence staining, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, permeabilized for 10 min with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, and then blocked for 60 min with 1.0% BSA, followed by incubation with indicated antibodies. All the cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI before imaging.
In vitro kinase assays
In vitro kinase assays were performed as described before [61]. Cells were transfected with plasmids encoding NleL and Flag-JNK1 or JNK2. 24 h after transfection, cells were treated with or without TNFα (10 ng/m1) for 10 min. Cell were then lysed and subjected to IP with anti-Flag M2 beads in M2 buffer (containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 250 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 3.0 mM EDTA, 3.0 mM EGTA). Then the beads with the precipitated JNK proteins were washed and subjected to in vitro kinase reaction (30 μl total) containing 1.0 μg of GST-c-Jun (1-79aa) in the kinase buffer (30 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 3.0 mM DTT, 30 mM PNPP, 0.2 mM NaVO3, 30 mM MgCl2) supplemented with 2.0 mM ATP. The in vitro kinase assays involving human JNKs were carried out at 30°C for 60 min. Reactions were stopped by adding 1 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer and subjected to IB analysis with anti-p-c-Jun antibody.
Luciferase reporter assay
Luciferase reporter assays were performed as described previously [62]. HEK293T cells seeded in 24-well plates were transiently co-transfected with 50 ng of pAP-1-Luc and 10 ng of pRL-tk-Luc together with or without 500 ng of pCDNA3-NleL, using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent. The total amounts of DNA were kept constant by supplementing empty vector (pCNDA3.0). 24 h after transfection, cells were subjected to TNFα (R&D Systems Inc., 10 ng/ml) or PMA (Sigma, 20 nM) for indicated time. Cells were then lysed in 1 × Passive Lysis Buffer (5 × concentrate diluted in ddH2O, Promega) for 15 min at room temperature with vigorous shaking. AP-1 activities were finally determined using the dual luciferase assay kit (Promega). Results were independently replicated for at least three experiments.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis
Total RNAs from indicated cells were extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen). RNA concentrations were determined on Nanodrop ND-1000 sepectrophotometer. 0.1 μg total RNAs were used to cDNA synthesis with the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit (FSQ-201, TOYOBO), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The relative levels of genes expression (normalized to those of Gapdh) were assessed in triplicate wells of a 96-well reaction plate by subjecting 10 ng cDNAs per well to a Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch Detection System with SYBR Green chemistry using the following primers:
human Ccnd1-forward: 5’-CCGTCCATGCGGAAGATC-3’;
human Ccnd1-reverse: 5’ -GAAGACCTCCTCCTCGCACT-3’ [63];
human Gapdh-forward: 5’-TGCCCTCAACGACCACTTTG-3’;
human Gapdh-reverse: 5’-TTCCTCTTGTGCTCTTGCTGGG-3’ [64].
qRT-PCR data were analyzed on Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0.
Multiple sequence alignments
Protein sequences were retrieved from the RefSeq database, aligned with ClustalW2, and further processed on GeneDoc.
SEM
Caco-2 cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and then processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis as previously described [65]. SEM samples were examined at 25 kV using a FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit TEM (SIBCB, China).
Yeast two-hybrid assays
Y2H screening with full-length NleL as the bait was performed as described previously [53].
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance of the data was determined using the Student’s t-test. In all experiments, only P value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Wei Bian and her team in the Cell Biology Core Facility of SIBCB for their excellent support in imaging. We thank Dr. Yalan Wu and all other members of the Hu lab for support. The authors are also thankful to Dr. Yefei Li and Miss Yidi Sun for assistance in picture illustration. We also thank Dr. Jianping Yi, Dr. Yufeng Yao and Dr. Yunlong Wu for their generous support.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB19000000, XDPB03), National Science Foundation of China (31270828, 31070678, and 81525019, an award for national outstanding young scientists), the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2012CB910800, 2013CB910900 to RH) and NIH fellowship (F30CA183528 to ZC). RH was also supported by Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, CAS; and the Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (YZ201339). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Bugarel M, Martin A, Fach P, Beutin L. Virulence gene profiling of enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteropathogenic (EPEC) Escherichia coli strains: a basis for molecular risk assessment of typical and atypical EPEC strains. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11(1):142–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gallegos KM, Conrady DG, Karve SS, Gunasekera TS, Herr AB, Weiss AA. Shiga toxin binding to glycolipids and glycans. PLoS one. 2012;7(2):e30368 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Campellone KG, Leong JM. Tails of two Tirs: actin pedestal formation by enteropathogenic E-coli and enterohemorrhagic E-coli O157:H7. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6(1):82–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goosney DL, DeVinney R, Finlay BB. Recruitment of cytoskeletal and signaling proteins to enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli pedestals. Infect Immun. 2001;69(5):3315–22. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3315-3322.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stevens JM, Galyov EE, Stevens MP. Actin-dependent movement of bacterial pathogens. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2006;4(2):91–101. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Campellone KG, Giese A, Tipper DJ, Leong JM. A tyrosine-phosphorylated 12-amino-acid sequence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Tir binds the host adaptor protein Nck and is required for Nck localization to actin pedestals. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43(5):1227–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Donnenberg MS, Tacket CO, James SP, Losonsky G, Nataro JP, Wasserman SS, et al. Role of the Eaea Gene in Experimental Enteropathogenic Escherichia-coli Infection. J Clin Invest. 1993;92(3):1412–7. doi: 10.1172/JCI116717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tzipori S, Gunzer F, Donnenberg MS, Demontigny L, Kaper JB, Donohuerolfe A. The Role of the Eaea Gene in Diarrhea and Neurological Complications in a Gnotobiotic Piglet Model of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia-Coli Infection. Infect Immun. 1995;63(9):3621–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Campellone KG, Robbins D, Leong JM. EspF(U) is a translocated EHEC effector that interacts with Tir and N-WASP and promotes nck-independent actin assembly. Dev Cell. 2004;7(2):217–28. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abe A, de Grado M, Pfuetzner RA, Sanchez-SanMartin C, DeVinney R, Puente JL, et al. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli translocated intimin receptor, Tir, requires a specific chaperone for stable secretion. Mol Microbiol. 1999;33(6):1162–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hueck CJ. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(2):379–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maculins T, Fiskin E, Bhogaraju S, Dikic I. Bacteria-host relationship: ubiquitin ligases as weapons of invasion. Cell Res. 2016;26:499–510. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qiu JZ, Sheedlo MJ, Yu KW, Tan YH, Nakayasu ES, Das C, et al. Ubiquitination independent of E1 and E2 enzymes by bacterial effectors. Nature. 2016;533(7601):120–4. doi: 10.1038/nature17657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin DY, Diao J, Zhou D, Chen J. Biochemical and structural studies of a HECT-like ubiquitin ligase from Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(1):441–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.167643 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hospenthal MK, Freund SM, Komander D. Assembly, analysis and architecture of atypical ubiquitin chains. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(5):555–65. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2547 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin DY-w, Diao J, Chen J. Crystal structures of two bacterial HECT-like E3 ligases in complex with a human E2 reveal atomic details of pathogen-host interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(6):1925–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Valkevich EM, Sanchez NA, Ge Y, Strieter ER. Middle-down mass spectrometry enables characterization of branched ubiquitin chains. Biochemistry. 2014;53(30):4979–89. doi: 10.1021/bi5006305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Piscatelli H, Kotkar SA, McBee ME, Muthupalani S, Schauer DB, Mandrell RE, et al. The EHEC type III effector NleL is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that modulates pedestal formation. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e19331 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019331 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davis RJ. Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell. 2000;103(2):239–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bogoyevitch MA, Kobe B. Uses for JNK: the many and varied substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(4):1061–95. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00025-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(12):6640–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Frankel G, Phillips AD, Rosenshine I, Dougan G, Kaper JB, Knutton S. Enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: more subversive elements. Mol Microbiol. 1998;30(5):911–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim W, Bennett EJ, Huttlin EL, Guo A, Li J, Possemato A, et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome. Mol Cell. 2011;44(2):325–40. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Cheng D, Marsischky G, et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(8):921–6. doi: 10.1038/nbt849 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Girardin SE, Tournebize R, Mavris M, Page AL, Li X, Stark GR, et al. CARD4/Nod1 mediates NF-κB and JNK activation by invasive Shigella flexneri. EMBO reports. 2001;2(8):736–42. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yeh M-C, Mukaro V, Hii CS, Ferrante A. Regulation of neutrophil-mediated killing of Staphylococcus aureus and chemotaxis by c-jun NH2 terminal kinase. J Leukocyte Biol. 2010;87(5):925–32. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0609399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haeusgen W, Herdegen T, Waetzig V. The bottleneck of JNK signaling: molecular and functional characteristics of MKK4 and MKK7. Eur J Cell Biol. 2011;90(6):536–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Behrens A, Sibilia M, Wagner EF. Amino-terminal phosphorylation of c-Jun regulates stress-induced apoptosis and cellular proliferation. Nat Genet. 1999;21(3):326–9. doi: 10.1038/6854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shaulian E, Karin M. AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene. 2001;20(19):2390–400. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ozanne BW, Spence HJ, McGarry LC, Hennigan RF. Transcription factors control invasion: AP-1 the first among equals. Oncogene. 2007;26(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tu W-w, Ji L-d, Qian H-x, Zhou M, Zhao J-s, Xu J. Tributyltin induces disruption of microfilament in HL7702 cells via MAPK-mediated hyperphosphorylation of VASP. Environ Toxicol. 2015;31(11):1530–8. doi: 10.1002/tox.22157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Artursson P, Palm K, Luthman K. Caco-2 monolayers in experimental and theoretical predictions of drug transport. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2001;46(1):27–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hubatsch I, Ragnarsson EG, Artursson P. Determination of drug permeability and prediction of drug absorption in Caco-2 monolayers. Nature protocols. 2007;2(9):2111–9. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun D, Lennernas H, Welage LS, Barnett JL, Landowski CP, Foster D, et al. Comparison of human duodenum and Caco-2 gene expression profiles for 12,000 gene sequences tags and correlation with permeability of 26 drugs. Pharmaceutical research. 2002;19(10):1400–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Frankel G, Phillips AD. Attaching effacing Escherichia coli and paradigms of Tir‐triggered actin polymerization: getting off the pedestal. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(3):549–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01103.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deng W, Vallance BA, Li Y, Puente JL, Finlay BB. Citrobacter rodentium translocated intimin receptor (Tir) is an essential virulence factor needed for actin condensation, intestinal colonization and colonic hyperplasia in mice. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48(1):95–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mundy R, MacDonald TT, Dougan G, Frankel G, Wiles S. Citrobacter rodentium of mice and man. Cell Microbiol. 2005;7(12):1697–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00625.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kerscher O, Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:159–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li W, Tu D, Brunger AT, Ye Y. A ubiquitin ligase transfers preformed polyubiquitin chains from a conjugating enzyme to a substrate. Nature. 2007;446(7133):333–7. doi: 10.1038/nature05542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Swatek KN, Komander D. Ubiquitin modifications. Cell Res. 2016;26(4):399–422. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kragelj J, Palencia A, Nanao MH, Maurin D, Bouvignies G, Blackledge M, et al. Structure and dynamics of the MKK7-JNK signaling complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(11):3409–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419528112 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nijman SMB, Luna-Vargas MPA, Velds A, Brummelkamp TR, Dirac AMG, Sixma TK, et al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell. 2005;123(5):773–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Reyes-Turcu FE, Ventii KH, Wilkinson KD. Regulation and Cellular Roles of Ubiquitin-Specific Deubiquitinating Enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:363–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082307.091526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Todi SV, Paulson HL. Balancing act: deubiquitinating enzymes in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 2011;34(7):370–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shen H-M, Liu Z-g. JNK signaling pathway is a key modulator in cell death mediated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Free Radical Biol Med. 2006;40(6):928–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lundby A, Lage K, Weinert BT, Bekker-Jensen DB, Secher A, Skovgaard T, et al. Proteomic analysis of lysine acetylation sites in rat tissues reveals organ specificity and subcellular patterns. Cell reports. 2012;2(2):419–31. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wagner SA, Beli P, Weinert BT, Nielsen ML, Cox J, Mann M, et al. A proteome-wide, quantitative survey of in vivo ubiquitylation sites reveals widespread regulatory roles. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(10):M111.013284 doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.013284 ; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wadolkowski EA, Burris JA, O'Brien AD. Mouse model for colonization and disease caused by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157: H7. Infect Immun. 1990;58(8):2438–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.McGannon CM, Fuller CA, Weiss AA. Different classes of antibiotics differentially influence Shiga toxin production. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2010;54(9):3790–8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01783-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wong CS, Jelacic S, Habeeb RL, Watkins SL, Tarr PI. The risk of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome after antibiotic treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections. New Engl J Med. 2000;342(26):1930–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006293422601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Scheiring J, Andreoli SP, Zimmerhackl LB. Treatment and outcome of Shiga-toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Pediatric Nephrology. 2008;23(10):1749–60. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0935-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu Z, Chen P, Gao H, Gu Y, Yang J, Peng H, et al. Ubiquitylation of Autophagy Receptor Optineurin by HACE1 Activates Selective Autophagy for Tumor Suppression. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(1):106–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee DJ, Bingle LEH, Heurlier K, Pallen MJ, Penn CW, Busby SJW, et al. Gene doctoring: a method for recombineering in laboratory and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu WX, Li XY, Bao J, Guan WK, Zhao ZT, Yuan CW, et al. Construction and evaluation of a fluorescence-based live attenuated Escherichia coli delivery system for generating oral vaccine candidate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(9):4005–18. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6332-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhao Y, Yang J, Shi J, Gong YN, Lu Q, Xu H, et al. The NLRC4 inflammasome receptors for bacterial flagellin and type III secretion apparatus. Nature. 2011;477(7366):596–600. doi: 10.1038/nature10510 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li S, Zhang L, Yao Q, Li L, Dong N, Rong J, et al. Pathogen blocks host death receptor signalling by arginine GlcNAcylation of death domains. Nature. 2013;501(7466):242–6. doi: 10.1038/nature12436 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fujishita T, Aoki M, Taketo MM. JNK signaling promotes intestinal tumorigenesis through activation of mTOR complex 1 in Apc(Delta716) mice. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(5):1556–63 e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zhang L, Ding X, Cui J, Xu H, Chen J, Gong YN, et al. Cysteine methylation disrupts ubiquitin-chain sensing in NF-kappaB activation. Nature. 2012;481(7380):204–8. doi: 10.1038/nature10690 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shen J, Sheng X, Chang Z, Wu Q, Wang S, Xuan Z, et al. Iron Metabolism Regulates p53 Signaling through Direct Heme-p53 Interaction and Modulation of p53 Localization, Stability, and Function. Cell Reports. 2014;7(1):180–93. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hibi M, Lin A, Smeal T, Minden A, Karin M. Identification of an oncoprotein- and UV-responsive protein kinase that binds and potentiates the c-Jun activation domain. Genes Dev. 1993;7(11):2135–48. Epub 1993/11/01. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Matsumoto J, Ohshima T, Isono O, Shimotohno K. HTLV-1 HBZ suppresses AP-1 activity by impairing both the DNA-binding ability and the stability of c-Jun protein. Oncogene. 2005;24(6):1001–10. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ström A, Hartman J, Foster JS, Kietz S, Wimalasena J, Gustafsson J-Å. Estrogen receptor β inhibits 17β-estradiol-stimulated proliferation of the breast cancer cell line T47D. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(6):1566–71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308319100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tian W-L, He F, Fu X, Lin J-T, Tang P, Huang Y-M, et al. High expression of heat shock protein 90 alpha and its significance in human acute leukemia cells. Gene. 2014;542(2):122–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.03.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hemrajani C, Marches O, Wiles S, Girard F, Dennis A, Dziva F, et al. Role of NleH, a type III secreted effector from attaching and effacing pathogens, in colonization of the bovine, ovine, and murine gut. Infect Immun. 2008;76(11):4804–13. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00742-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.