Skip to main content
MicrobiologyOpen logoLink to MicrobiologyOpen
. 2017 Mar 20;6(4):e00460. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.460

Comparative genome analysis reveals important genetic differences among serotype O1 and serotype O2 strains of Y. ruckeri and provides insights into host adaptation and virulence

Desirée Cascales 1, José A Guijarro 1,, Ana I García‐Torrico 1, Jessica Méndez 1
PMCID: PMC5552943  PMID: 28317294

Abstract

Despite the existence of a commercial vaccine routinely used to protect salmonids against Yersinia ruckeri, outbreaks still occur, mainly caused by nonmotile and lipase‐negative strains (serotype O1 biotype 2). Moreover, epizootics caused by other uncommon serotypes have also been reported. At the moment, one of the main concerns for the aquaculture industry is the expanding range of hosts of this pathogen and the emergence of new biotypes and serotypes causing mortality in fish farms and against which the vaccine cannot protect. The comparative analysis of the genome sequences of five Y. ruckeri strains (150, CSF007‐82, ATCC29473, Big Creek 74, and SC09) isolated from different hosts and classified into different serotypes revealed important genetic differences between the genomes analyzed. Thus, a clear genetic differentiation was found between serotype O1 and O2 strains. The presence of 99 unique genes in Big Creek 74 and 261 in SC09 could explain the adaptation of these strains to salmon and catfish, respectively. Finally, the absence of 21 genes in ATCC29473 which are present in the other four virulent strains could underpin the attenuation described for this strain. The study reveals important genetic differences among the genomes analyzed. Further investigation of the genes highlighted in this study could provide insights into the understanding of the virulence and niche adaptive mechanisms of Y. ruckeri.

Keywords: adaptation, Genome, host, Serotype, Virulence, Yersinia ruckeri

1. Background

Yersinia ruckeri is a gram‐negative rod‐shaped bacterium able to infect different fish species such as rainbow trout, carp, catfish, sturgeon, burbot, and perch. In salmonids, it causes enteric red mouth disease (ERM), a serious septicemic fish disease which is a major problem for aquaculture industries all over the world. Since its isolation in the United States in the 1950s (Ross, Rucker, & Ewing, 1966), the number of host species and the geographic distribution of this pathogen have increased considerably (Bastardo, Ravelo, & Romalde, 2015). Despite the existence of a reasonably effective immersion vaccine, outbreaks still occur, produced mainly by nonmotile and lipase‐negative strains (Arias et al., 2007; Austin, Robertson, & Austin, 2003; Calvez, Gantelet, Blanc, Douet, & Daniel, 2014; Fouz, Zarza, & Amaro, 2006).

In 1993, Y. ruckeri strains were classified into four serotypes with different subgroups (Romalde, Magariños, Barja, & Toranzo, 1993). The vast majority of epizootics in salmonid fish farms are caused by motile serotype O1, although epizootics caused by other uncommon serotypes have also been reported (Romalde, Planas, Sotelo, & Toranzo, 2003). Recently, a significant positive correlation between genetic and geographical distances was observed by Bastardo et al., 2015. Their results revealed that Y. ruckeri has experienced population changes that were probably induced by biogeography forces in the past and, much more recently, by adaptive processes resulting from aquaculture expansion.

During the last few years, nine genome sequences of Y. ruckeri strains, isolated from different niches have been uploaded onto NCBI (MKFJ00000000, NZ_CP011078, NZ_CP009539, JPFO00000000, CQBN00000000, CPUZ00000000, JPPT00000000, CCYO00000000, and JRWX00000000). Here, we present for the first time in this species a comparative analysis of five of those genomes belonging to strains isolated from different hosts and classified into different serotypes. The study reveals data that are important for a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the niche adaptation and virulence of Y. ruckeri.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Y. ruckeri strains used for genome comparison

Five previously sequenced Y. ruckeri strains were selected for comparative genome analysis based upon their characteristics and hosts (Table 1). Three strains were from serotype O1, isolated from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), of which two were virulent (Y. ruckeri 150 and Y. ruckeri CSF007‐82), while the other, ATCC29473 type strain, was described as nonvirulent (Furones, Gilpin, Alderman, & Munn, 1990). The other two strains included in the analysis were Y. ruckeri Big Creek 74, belonging to serotype O2 and isolated from salmon, and Y. ruckeri SC09 isolated from catfish and of unknown serotype.

Table 1.

List of Y. ruckeri strains used in comparative analysis

Characteristic 150 ATCC29473 CSF007‐82 Big Creek 74 SC09
Host Rainbow trout Rainbow trout Rainbow trout Chinook salmon Catfish
Genome size (Mb) 3.82 3.77 3.83 3.69 3.92
Scaffolds 49 2 1 1 32
Contigs 169 15 1 1 32
GC (%) 46.8 47.4 47.5 47.6 47.45
CDS 3,538 3,377 3,530 3,136 3,651
RNAs 25 80 102 103 127
Serotype O1 O1 O1 O2
Accession Number MKFJ00000000 JPPT00000000 CCYO00000000 CP011078 JRWX00000000

2.2. Comparative analysis of Y. ruckeri genomes

Identification of putative protein‐encoding genes and annotation of Y. ruckeri genomes were performed with Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) (Brettin et al., 2015). Before comparative analysis, the set of proteins from the five genomes selected were compared using BLAST to UniRef90 to associate each translation product to a Uniref90 protein. It was considered that a protein from one genome was orthologous to another one when they were in the same cluster. Based on this clusterization process, Venn diagrams were constructed with shared proteins (orthologous proteins) using the Venn diagram package in R (Chen & Boutros, 2011). Pairwise genome alignments were performed with MAUVE (Darling, Mau, Blattner, & Perna, 2004).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Y. ruckeri whole‐genome comparisons

The pairwise full genome alignments revealed a mosaic pattern of homology organized in local collinear blocks (LCBs) between 150 and each of the other four strains (Figure 1). The 150 strain shares larger portions of genetic information with CSF007‐82 and ATCC24973, than it does with Big Creek74 and SC09. This result suggests that Y. ruckeri strains belonging to serotype O1 and having rainbow trout as a host (150, ATCC29473, CSF007‐82) are genetically more similar to each other than to other serotypes isolated from different animals, suggesting that differences in cell surface antigens and host specificity may have a markedly genetic base.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chromosome alignments of Y. ruckeri 150 and (a) ATCC29473, (b) CSF007‐82, (c) Big Creek 74, and (d) SC09 using progressive Mauve. Local collinear blocks (LCBs) of conserved sequences among the strains are represented by rectangles of the same color. When these are above the chromosome (black line) they indicate the forward orientation and when they are positioned under the chromosome, the reverse orientation. Red lines represent contig limits. Connecting lines can be used to visualize genetic rearrangements

To identify orthologs shared by Y. ruckeri strains, a five‐way Venn diagram was made (Figure 2). The pangenome consists of 4,117 protein‐coding genes with a core of 3,090 genes (75.05%). A total of 370 genes were found to be strain‐specific, two genes corresponding to CSF007‐82, eight to ATCC29473, 99 to Big Creek 74, and 261 to SC09 genomes. Approximately, half of these unique genes (57%) were annotated as coding for hypothetical proteins. Interestingly, while serotype O1 strains isolated from rainbow trout have few unique genes (150 has none), the other two strains, Big Creek74 and SC09, have a great number, 99 and 261, respectively. Most of these genes could be related to host adaptation processes, in particular to survival in salmon in the first case and in catfish in the second.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Venn diagram of Y. ruckeri 150, ATCC29473, CSF007‐82, Big Creek 74, and SC09. The number in the center of the diagram represents the genes shared by all species, whereas the digit on each branch indicates the number of unique or shared genes of the different strains

As can be seen from the Venn diagram, the 150, ATCC29473, and CSF007‐82 strains share between them, and not with the other two strains, a total of 268 genes (6.5%). Similarly, the Big Creek 74 and SC09 strains share 122 (3%) genes which are absent in the genomes of serotype O1 strains. These data suggest a clear separation between serotype O1 strains and the Big Creek 74 and SC09 strains; so, it is tempting to speculate that SC09, whose serotype has not been described yet, could belong to serotype O2, as does Big Creek 74. This differentiation may constitute the genetic basis for the variation in serotype‐associated features among the strains.

3.2. Genes exclusively shared by serotype O1 strains

As mentioned above, a total of 268 genes were shared by 150, ATCC29473, and CSF007‐82 strains, all of them belonging to serotype O1 and isolated from rainbow trout. These genes include 113 which encode for hypothetical proteins, 33 are mobile genetic elements, 24 encode for phage‐related proteins, and 98 for proteins with different functions (Table 2). Thus, some of them are associated with restriction‐modification and toxin‐antitoxin systems. Both these systems have in common the death of cells that have lost one of the components (the antitoxin or the modification enzyme) and also their effect on global gene expression, which results in altered adaptive phenotypes. Thus, the antitoxin of the Escherichia coli MqsR–MqsA toxin‐antitoxin system directly represses the transcription of the gene encoding the master stress regulator RpoS, while the degradation of the antitoxin during stress leads to a switch from the high‐motility state to biofilm formation (Wang et al., 2011). In the same way, methylation events produced by restriction‐modification systems may affect nearby gene expression. Thus, methylation by Type III RM systems controls the expression of certain genes leading to two distinct cell types with two distinct phenotypes (“phasevarion”) (Srikhanta, Fox, & Jennings, 2010).

Table 2.

Proteins exclusively shared by serotype O1 strains

Protein 150 ATCC2947 CSF007
Restriction‐modification systems
Type I restriction‐modification system, specificity subunit S BI323_00005 DJ39_RS07815 CSF007_RS15880
Eco57I restriction‐modification methylase family protein BI323_06175 DJ39_RS04570 CSF007_RS05790
Type I restriction‐modification system, restriction subunit R BI323_00080 DJ39_RS07890 CSF007_RS15805
Type I restriction‐modification system, DNA‐methyltransferase subunit M BI323_00010 DJ39_RS07820 CSF007_RS15875
Restriction methylase BI323_06275 DJ39_RS04465 CSF007_RS05895
Restriction methylase BI323_07120 DJ39_RS07795 CSF007_RS06135
Antirestriction family protein BI323_06250 DJ39_RS04490 CSF007_RS05870
Antirestriction family protein BI323_000601 DJ39_RS07870 CSF007_RS15825
Toxin‐antitoxin systems
YfjZ protein (Antitoxin to YpjF) BI323_00070 DJ39_RS07880 CSF007_RS15815
Toxin YkfI BI323_00075 DJ39_RS07885 CSF007_RS15810
Toxin_HigB‐2_ BI323_15350 DJ39_RS16625 CSF007_RS00015
Antitoxin ParD BI323_16600 DJ39_RS11355 CSF007_RS09305
Toxin YkfI BI323_06265 DJ39_RS04475 CSF007_RS05885
Legionaminic acid biosynthesis
Dehydratase/C‐5‐epimerase BI323_14300 DJ39_RS00115 CSF007_RS08290
Aminotransferase BI323_14305 DJ39_RS00110 CSF007_RS08285
UDP‐N‐acetylglucosamine 2‐epimerase BI323_14310 DJ39_RS00105 CSF007_RS08280
N‐acetylneuraminate synthase BI323_14315 DJ39_RS00100 CSF007_RS08275
4‐amino‐6‐deoxy‐N‐Acetyl‐D‐hexosaminyl‐(Lipid carrier) acetyltrasferase BI323_14320 DJ39_RS00095 CSF007_RS08270
Mannose‐1‐phosphate guanyltransferase BI323_14325 DJ39_RS00090 CSF007_RS08265
Oxidoreductase, NAD‐binding Rossmann fold family protein BI323_14330 DJ39_RS00085 CSF007_RS08260
Acylneuraminate cytidylyltransferase BI323_14335 DJ39_RS00080 CSF007_RS08255
Dehydrogenase BI323_14340 DJ39_RS00075 CSF007_RS08250
Polysaccharide biosynthesis family protein BI323_14345 DJ39_RS00070 CSF007_RS08245
Aminotransferase BI323_14360 DJ39_RS00055 CSF007_RS08230
Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase subunit HisH BI323_14365 DJ39_RS00050 CSF007_RS08225
Imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase BI323_14370 DJ39_RS00045 CSF007_RS08220
Epimerase/dehydratase BI323_14375 DJ39_RS00040 CSF007_RS08215
UDP‐2‐acetamido‐2,6‐dideoxy‐beta‐L‐talose‐4‐dehy drogenase BI323_14380 DJ39_RS00035 CSF007_RS08210
UDP‐N‐acetylglucosamine 2‐epimerase BI323_14385 DJ39_RS00030 CSF007_RS08205
Glycosyl transferases group 1 family protein BI323_14390 DJ39_RS00025 CSF007_RS08200
Tryptophan synthase beta chain like BI323_14395 DJ39_RS00020 CSF007_RS08195
DNA repair
DNA repair RadC family protein BI323_00065 DJ39_RS07875 CSF007_RS15820
ATPase involved in DNA repair BI323_15390 DJ39_RS16660 CSF007_RS00050
DNA_repair_ATPase_ BI323_06180 DJ39_RS04565 CSF007_RS05795
ATPase involved in DNA repair BI323_06215 DJ39_RS04530 CSF007_RS05830
RadC family DNA repair protein BI323_06255 DJ39_RS04485 CSF007_RS05875
Transcriptional regulators
Regulator BI323_01350 DJ39_RS09205 CSF007_RS01385
XRE_family_transcriptional_regulator BI323_15355 DJ39_RS16630 CSF007_RS00020
Transcription_factor BI323_16050 DJ39_RS16900 CSF007_RS16935
XRE_family_transcriptional_regulator BI323_05810 DJ39_RS16260 CSF007_RS05430
Type IV secretion system
Type IV secretion‐system coupling DNA‐binding domain protein BI323_15400 DJ39_RS16670 CSF007_RS00060
TrbA BI323_15410 DJ39_RS16680 CSF007_RS00070
RelB/StbD replicon stabilization protein (Antitoxin to RelE/StbE) BI323_15420 DJ39_RS16690 CSF007_RS00080
Conjugal transfer/type IV secretion DotA/TraY family protein BI323_15425 DJ39_RS16680 CSF007_RS00085
IncI1 plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraW BI323_15435 DJ39_RS16705 CSF007_RS00095
IncI1 plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraU BI323_15440 DJ39_RS16710 CSF007_RS00100
IncI1 plasmid conjugative transfer protein BI323_15455 DJ39_RS16725 CSF007_RS00115
IncI1 plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraO BI323_15465 DJ39_RS16735 CSF007_RS00125
TraN BI323_15470 DJ39_RS16740 CSF007_RS00130
TraM BI323_15475 DJ39_RS16745 CSF007_RS00135
TraC BI323_15485 DJ39_RS16755 CSF007_RS00145
TraK BI323_15490 DJ39_RS16760 CSF007_RS00150
Plasmid transfer ATPase TraJ BI323_15495 DJ39_RS16765 CSF007_RS00155
TraI BI323_15500 DJ39_RS16770 CSF007_RS00160
IncI1 plasmid conjugative transfer protein TraH BI323_15505 DJ39_RS16775 CSF007_RS00165
Prepilin BI323_15525 DJ39_RS16795 CSF007_RS00185
General_secretion_pathway_protein_GspF BI323_15530 DJ39_RS16800 CSF007_RS00190
PilO BI323_15545 DJ39_RS16815 CSF007_RS00205
IncI1 plasmid conjugative transfer lipoprotein PilN BI323_15550 DJ39_RS16820 CSF007_RS00210
Type IVB pilus formation outer membrane protein, R64 PilN family BI323_15555 DJ39_RS16825 CSF007_RS00215
Transferases
Methyltransferase domain protein BI323_16780 DJ39_RS04020 CSF007_RS16255
Glycosyl transferase, family 2 BI323_06290 DJ39_RS04450 CSF007_RS05910
Other proteins
ATP/GTP‐binding_protein BI323_00035 DJ39_RS07845 CSF007_RS15850
Bipolar DNA helicase HerA BI323_10945 DJ39_RS01005 CSF007_RS11255
Phosphopantetheine attachment site family protein BI323_13885 DJ39_RS06465 CSF007_RS15645
AMP‐dependent synthetase BI323_13890 DJ39_RS06470 CSF007_RS15640
3‐oxoacyl‐[acyl‐carrier protein] reductase BI323_13895 DJ39_RS06475 CSF007_RS15635
Polysaccharide deacetylase BI323_13905 DJ39_RS06485 CSF007_RS15625
Endonuclease BI323_15395 DJ39_RS16665 CSF007_RS00055
Putative ATP‐binding protein involved in virulence BI323_16055 DJ39_RS16905 CSF007_RS16930
ATP‐dependent DNA helicase RecG BI323_16060 DJ39_RS16910 CSF007_RS16925
Chromosome segregation ATPase BI323_16110 DJ39_RS16960 CSF007_RS16875
Initiator Replication family protein BI323_16595 DJ39_RS11350 CSF007_RS09310
Plasmid_stabilization_protein_ BI323_16605 DJ39_RS11360 CSF007_RS09300
Cobyrinic acid a,c‐diamide synthase BI323_16640 DJ39_RS11395 CSF007_RS09265
Glycosaminoglycan attachment site BI323_16685 DJ39_RS14755 CSF007_RS03940
Retron‐type RNA‐directed DNA polymerase BI323_16690 DJ39_RS14760 CSF007_RS03935
Sulfur transport family protein BI323_16730 DJ39_RS00135 CSF007_RS17245
Cytotoxic family protein BI323_16760 DJ39_RS17105 CSF007_RS17365
Low calcium response locus protein T BI323_16800 DJ39_RS04040 CSF007_RS16275
ParB/RepB/Spo0J family partition domain protein BI323_16820 DJ39_RS16600 CSF007_RS16685
Plasmid partition protein A BI323_16825 DJ39_RS16605 CSF007_RS16690
ATP‐dependent Lon protease BI323_06155 DJ39_RS04590 CSF007_RS05770
alkaline_phosphatase BI323_06160 DJ39_RS04585 CSF007_RS05775
ABC_transporter_ATP‐binding_protein_ BI323_06170 DJ39_RS04575 CSF007_RS05785
DNA‐binding_protein_ BI323_06200 DJ39_RS04545 CSF007_RS05815
AlpA family protein BI323_06210 DJ39_RS04535 CSF007_RS05825
GTPase BI323_06225 DJ39_RS04520 CSF007_RS05840
YagBYeeUYfjZ family protein BI323_06270 DJ39_RS04470 CSF007_RS05890
DNA‐binding protein BI323_06285 DJ39_RS04455 CSF007_RS05905
37‐kD nucleoid‐associated bacterial protein BI323_06340 DJ39_RS00940 CSF007_RS06920
(p)ppGpp_synthetase_ BI323_06345 DJ39_RS00935 CSF007_RS06915
Colicin‐Ib BI323_06365 DJ39_RS17065 CSF007_RS17470
AAA ATPase BI323_06375 DJ39_RS00905 CSF007_RS06885
AAA ATPase BI323_06400 DJ39_RS00875 CSF007_RS06855
Invasin BI323_06460 DJ39_RS17045 CSF007_RS17450
DNA‐directed RNA polymerase subunit sigma70 BI323_09490 DJ39_RS13885 CSF007_RS05930
ATP‐binding_protein_ BI323_09540 DJ39_RS13835 CSF007_RS05980

A relevant finding shared by all serotype O1 strains was related to a cluster of genes which are involved in the biosynthesis of the legionaminic acid, a nine‐carbon diamino monosaccharide that is found coating the surface of various bacterial human pathogens, being the major component of the LPS. Interestingly, these genes which are grouped in a cluster of at least 18 genes are absent in other Yersinia species but present in other aquatic bacteria such as Vibrio vulnificus, Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio fischeri, or Photobacterium profundum. It is possible that this cluster provides an adaptive advantage for surviving in the aquatic environment or, as happens in some organisms such as Campylobacter jejuni (Zebian et al., 2016), it is related to virulence. This is because legionaminic acid is essential for flagella assembly in several species (Morrison & Imperiali, 2014) and for this reason, the genes involved in its biosynthesis are novel targets for the development of antivirulence agents (Table 2).

Other genes which are exclusive to O1 serotype strains code for a bacteriocin similar to colicin‐Ib of Escherichia coli (WP_062877260) and virulence factors such as a type IV secretion system previously analyzed by Méndez et al., (2009) and an invasin present in other enterobacteriaceae such as Yersinia pestis (EIR59646), Y. pseudotuberculosis (WP_050128752), and Edwarsiella tarda (WP_047059316) (Table 2).

3.3. Genes exclusively shared by Big Creek 74 and SC09 strains

As indicated in the Venn diagram (Figure 2), Big Creek 74 and SC09 share a total of 122 genes which include 37 ORFs encoding for proteins of unknown function, 50 for phage‐related proteins, and 35 encode for proteins with similarity to proteins involved in a variety of functions such as restriction‐modification systems, toxin‐antitoxin systems or proteins involved in fimbriae synthesis (Table 3). One such case is that of a cluster involved in fimbriae biosynthesis, similar to the Stf cluster of Salmonella typhimurium which has been associated with differences in virulence and host range between the different serotypes (Emmerth, Goebel, Miller, & Hueck, 1999). Although one Stf cluster copy is present in the five genomes analyzed (Figure 3a), an additional complete copy of this cluster was only found in the genome of SC09 and, with the exception of the gene encoding the minor fimbriae subunit (stfE), also in Big Creek 74 (Figure 3b). The last copy seems to be the result of several genetic rearrangements so it is probably not functional in those strains (Figure 3b).

Table 3.

Proteins shared by Big Creek 74 and SC09 strains

Protein SC09 Big creek 74
Restriction‐modification system
TypeI R‐M System, specificity subunitS NJ56_RS02590 UGYR_RS06280
Toxin‐antitoxin system
Antitoxin to RelE/StbE NJ56_RS02580 UGYR_RS12460
Replicon stabilization toxin RelE NJ56_RS02585 UGYR_RS12465
Fimbria
Fimbrial protein StfD NJ56_RS14520 UGYR_RS0378
Exotoxin/MrfF NJ56_RS14525 UGYR_RS03790
Putative fimbrial membrane protein NJ56_RS14530 UGYR_RS03795
Exotoxin NJ56_RS14540 UGYR_RS03805
Fimbrial anchoring protein FimD NJ56_RS10070 UGYR_RS06285
Fimbrial subunit NJ56_RS17965 UGYR_RS16650
Exotoxin/minnor fimbrial subunit NJ56_RS14535 UGYR_RS03800
Fimbria‐like adhesine SfmA NJ56_RS16255 UGYR_RS05635
Fimbrial periplasmic chaperone SfmC NJ56_RS10065 UGYR_RS06280
Fimbrial like adhesine prot NJ56_RS17890 UGYR_RS16665
PilN family type IV pilus biogenesis protein NJ56_RS10080 UGYR_RS06295
GCN5‐related N‐acetyltransferase NJ56_RS10095 UGYR_RS06310
Insecticidal virulence protein
Probable insecticidal protein NJ56_RS10100 UGYR_RS06315
Putative toxin subunit NJ56_RS10110 UGYR_RS06325
Putative insecticidal toxin complex NJ56_RS10115 UGYR_RS06330
Sorbitol sorbose utilization
Arabinose 5‐phosphate isomerase NJ56_RS11170 UGYR_RS07380
Transcriptional regulator/glucitol operon activator prot NJ56_RS11160 UGYR_RS07370
Transcriptional repressor of fructose operon DeoR family NJ56_RS11165 UGYR_RS07375
Sorbitol‐6‐phosphate 2‐dehydrogenase NJ56_RS11155 UGYR_RS07365
PTS glucitol/sorbitol transporter subunit IIB NJ56_RS11145 UGYR_RS07355
PTS glucitol/sorbitol transporter subunit IIA NJ56_RS11150 UGYR_RS07360
PTS glucitol/sorbitol transporter subunit IIC NJ56_RS11140 UGYR_RS07350
Other proteins
Transcriptional regulator LysR family NJ56_RS10085 UGYR_RS06300
S‐adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase NJ56_RS02625 UGYR_RS12500
rimosomal protein NJ56_RS14055 UGYR_RS02835
Outer memb component of tripartite multidrug resistance system NJ56_RS10260 UGYR_RS06475
Chromosome partitioning protein ParA NJ56_RS11555 UGYR_RS07765
Tfp pilus assembly protein%2C major pilin PilA NJ56_RS09235 UGYR_RS02515
yclopropane‐fatty‐acyl‐phospholipid synthase NJ56_RS11560 UGYR_RS07770
FAD‐dependent oxidoreductase NJ56_RS11550 UGYR_RS07760
Inorganic pyrophosphatase/exopoliphosphatase NJ56_RS02630 UGYR_RS12505
Spermidine/putrescine ABC trasporter permease NJ56_RS06425 UGYR_RS16290

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Analysis of the stf genes in Y. ruckeri genomes. Two copies of the stf cluster were found in Y. ruckeri strains. One copy of the cluster stfACDEFG is complete in the five strains (a), while a second copy is only complete in SC09, and with the exception of stfE gene, in Big Creek 74. The second copy of the stf cluster in 150, ATCC29473, and CSF007‐82 strains is only constituted by stfA and stfC genes (b). Note that the gene represented by a striped arrow, which encodes a lipid A core‐O‐antigen ligase, was affected by a translocation and an inversion event, resulting in a different localization in the two clusters

Three insecticidal toxin complexes (tc)‐like proteins were also identified as unique in these strains. They are similar to the TcdA, TcdB, and TcdC proteins of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, which are involved in the production of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease in penaeid shrimp (Tang & Lightner, 2014).

One of the most interesting findings was that Big Creek 74 and SC09 strains share a cluster of seven genes involved in the utilization of sorbitol (Figure 4), a previously described characteristic associated with Y. ruckeri serotype O2 strains (Davies & Frerichs, 1989), which supports the hypothesis that SC09 belongs to this serotype. The genes are similar to gutAEBD of E. coli (Yamada & Saier, 1987). The first three genes encode the three subunits of the sorbitol transporter of the phosphoenolpyruvate‐dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS), involved in the uptake and phosphorylation of sorbitol, while gutD encodes a sorbitol‐6‐phosphate 2‐dehydrogenase that synthesizes D‐fructose 6‐phosphate from D‐sorbitol 6‐phosphate. In Y. ruckeri strains, as occurs in E. coli, downstream of gutAEBD genes, there are two transcriptional regulators, an activator and a repressor of the sorbitol operon, similar to gutM and gutR of E. coli, respectively. Downstream of gutR, is located gutQ, which encodes an arabinose 5‐phosphate isomerase involved in LPS biosynthesis. Although the role of this protein in the sorbitol metabolism is unclear, it could be a regulatory molecule involved in expression of the gut operon (Meredith & Woodard, 2005). In the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora, the presence of this operon has been linked to virulence and suggested to contribute to host specificity (Aldridge, Metzger, & Geider, 1997).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Genetic organization of the gut operon in Y. ruckeri Big Creek 74 and SC09 strains. gutA, gutE, and gutB: subunits of a glucitol/sorbitol‐specific transporter, gutD: sorbitol‐6‐phosphate 2‐dehydrogenase, gutM: glucitol operon activator protein, gutR: glucitol operon repressor protein, gutQ: an arabinose 5‐phosphate isomerase. pfk encodes for a 6‐phosphofructokinase class II

3.4. Unique genes of Big Creek 74

As was seen in the Venn diagram (Figure 2), Big Creek 74 strain has a total of 99 unique genes, which include 53 encoding hypothetical proteins, eight phage genes, four mobile genetic elements, and 34 genes which encode proteins with known function. As was mentioned above, the presence of some of these genes may underpin its adaptation to salmon, since the host of the other four strains is rainbow trout or catfish.

Among the proteins with known function (Table S1), we can find restriction‐modification systems, transcriptional regulators, transferases, or proteins involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis. Especially interesting is the gene encoding an ATP‐dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit, a relevant regulatory enzyme in different bacteria, related also to virulence, environmental adaptation, and antibiotic resistance in microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus (Frees, Gerth, & Ingmer, 2014) or the fish pathogen Pseudomonas fluorescens (Liu, Chi, & Sun, 2015).

3.5. Unique genes of SC09

SC09 has a total of 261 genes that are not present in the other strains, 148 of them encode hypothetical proteins, 17 are phage‐related genes, nine mobile genetic elements, and the rest encode proteins with different functions. As was suggested for Big Creek 74, some of these genes may underpin the adaptation of this strain to survive inside the host (catfish) or under certain environmental conditions. Among these unique proteins are transcriptional regulators, proteins related to type IV secretion systems, restriction‐modification, and toxin‐antitoxin components and proteins associated with cellular energy homeostasis (Table S2). One of the most interesting proteins is a thymidylate synthase, an enzyme linked to virulence in several microorganisms such as Staphylococcus aureus (Kriegeskorte et al., 2014) or Salmonella typhimurium, in which it was necessary for intracellular growth, both in macrophage‐like and Hep‐2 human epithelial cell lines (1) and also for complete virulence in a BALB/c mice model (Kok, Bühlmann, & Pechère, 2001).

A finding which is worthy of further investigation was the presence, only in this strain, of a cluster of 12 genes related to cell wall polysaccharide biosynthesis, in particular the O‐antigen.

3.6. Genes solely absent in the avirulent strain ATCC29473

Among the five strains included in the study, ATCC29473 was defined as avirulent. In this sense, it was intriguing to analyze which genes are absent in this strain and present in the others, in order to elucidate the genetic basis of its attenuation. A total of 21 genes were found (Table 4), all of them encoding proteins with an assigned function, which were probably lost during the evolution of this strain. It is significant that 17 out of 21 genes are adjacent in the other four genomes from virulent strains (Figure 5). This region of 19,566 bp contains genes encoding for a Crp‐Fnr family transcriptional regulator, a hypothetical protein, an enzyme related to an enterobactin‐like siderophore and three different gene clusters: one formed by three genes involved in iron transport, a group of three genes related to hexose phosphate uptake; and a region containing nine genes involved in the uptake and metabolism of citrate. Since most of these genes are related to virulence (Gray, Freitag, & Boor, 2006; Moisi et al., 2013; Urbany & Neuhaus, 2008), it is possible that the absence of this region could explain, in some way, the attenuation of Y. ruckeri ATCC29473. This is important for future studies and may help to shed light on the virulence of the species.

Table 4.

Proteins absent in the avirulent strain ATCC29473 and present in the other strains

Protein 150 BIG CREEK 74 CSF007‐82 SC09
Aromatic amino acid decarboxylase BI323_03940 UGYR_RS01810 CSF007_RS12055 NJ56_RS08540
Serine hydrolase family protein BI323_03955 UGYR_RS01805 CSF007_RS12040 NJ56_RS08535
Virulence factor BI323_03960 UGYR_RS01800 CSF007_RS12035 NJ56_RS08530
Crp‐like helix‐turn‐helix domain protein BI323_16505 UGYR_RS04050 CSF007_RS14555 NJ56_RS14785
Fe(3 + ) ions import ATP‐binding protein FbpC BI323_16510 UGYR_RS04045 CSF007_RS14560 NJ56_RS14780
Putative binding protein‐dependent transport system%2C inner‐membrane component BI323_16515 UGYR_RS04040 CSF007_RS14565 NJ56_RS14775
Bacterial extracellular solute‐binding family protein BI323_16520 UGYR_RS04035 CSF007_RS14570 NJ56_RS14770
Major Facilitator Superfamily protein BI323_16525 UGYR_RS04030 CSF007_RS14575 NJ56_RS14765
Sensor histidine protein kinase UhpB, glucose‐6‐phosphate specific BI323_16530 UGYR_RS04025 CSF007_RS14580 NJ56_RS14760
Bacterial regulatory s, luxR family protein BI323_16535 UGYR_RS04020 CSF007_RS14585 NJ56_RS14755
Transcriptional regulatory protein BI323_16540 UGYR_RS04015 CSF007_RS14590 NJ56_RS14750
Sensor histidine kinase DpiB BI323_16545 UGYR_RS04010 CSF007_RS14595 NJ56_RS14745
[citrate (Pro‐3S)‐lyase] ligase BI323_16550 UGYR_RS04005 CSF007_RS14600 NJ56_RS14740
Citrate lyase acyl carrier protein BI323_16555 UGYR_RS04000 CSF007_RS14605 NJ56_RS14735
Citrate lyase subunit beta BI323_16560 UGYR_RS03995 CSF007_RS14610 NJ56_RS14730
Citrate lyase alpha chain BI323_16565 UGYR_RS03990 CSF007_RS14615 NJ56_RS14725
Holo‐ACP synthase CitX BI323_16570 UGYR_RS03985 CSF007_RS14620 NJ56_RS14720
Probable 2‐(5’’‐triphosphoribosyl)‐3′‐dephosphocoenzyme‐A synthase BI323_16575 UGYR_RS03980 CSF007_RS14625 NJ56_RS14715
Citrate carrier BI323_16580 UGYR_RS03975 CSF007_RS14630 NJ56_RS14710
4′‐phosphopantetheinyl transferase siderophore BI323_16585 UGYR_RS03970 CSF007_RS14635 NJ56_RS14705
Holin BI323_09445 UGYR_RS04445 CSF007_RS17025 NJ56_RS17590

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Genetic organization of the DNA region absent in ATCC29473 and present in the other strains. The region contains genes encoding for an enterobactin‐like siderophore (blue), nine genes involved in the uptake and metabolism of citrate (yellow), a group of three genes related to hexose phosphate uptake (pink), three genes involved in iron transport (red), and a Crp‐Fnr family transcriptional regulator (green). 1: Citrate succinate antiporter, 2: 2‐(5′’‐triphosphoribosyl)‐3′‐dephosphocoenzyme‐A synthase, 3: Apo‐citrate lyase phosphoribosyl‐dephospho‐CoA transferase, 4: Citrate lyase alpha chain, 5: Citrate lyase beta chain, 6: Citrate lyase gamma chain acyl carrier protein, 7: [Citrate [pro‐3S]‐lyase] ligase, 8: Sensor kinase, 9: Transcriptional regulatory protein, 10: Transcriptional regulatory protein, 11: Sensor histidine protein kinase glucose‐6‐phosphate specific, 12: Hexose phosphate uptake regulatory protein, 13: Ferric iron ABC transporter iron‐binding protein, 14: Ferric iron ABC transporter permease protein, 15: Ferric iron ABC transporter binding subunit

4. Conclusion

In this study, is presented for the first time, the comparative analysis of five genome sequences of Y. ruckeri. Although the five strains shared approximately 75% of their genes, our study has revealed important genetic differences between the five genomes. Aside from the genetic differentiation found between serotype O1 and O2 strains, especially relevant are the high number of unique genes found in Big Creek 74 and SC09 in relation to serotype O1 strains and the 21 genes absent in the avirulent strain ATCC29473. These findings could explain the host specificity of the first two strains or the virulence attenuation of ATCC29473. Further investigation of those genes will provide insights into understanding the pathogenesis and the adaptive mechanisms to different environments of Y. ruckeri.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Statement

This research did not involve any human or animal subjects, materials, or data and therefore did not require any ethics oversight or approval in these respects.

Supporting information

 

 

Acknowledgments

We thank Pilar Reimundo for her valuable suggestions at the beginning of this project. This work was financially supported by the projects AGL2012‐35808 and AGL2015‐66018‐R, from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) of Spain and the FEDER fund. Desirée Cascales and Ana I García‐Torrico were the recipient of grants from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (MEC) and from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO), respectively.

Cascales D, Guijarro JA, García‐Torrico AI, Méndez J. Comparative genome analysis reveals important genetic differences among serotype O1 and serotype O2 strains of Y. ruckeri and provides insights into host adaptation and virulence. MicrobiologyOpen. 2017;6:e460 https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.460

References

  1. Aldridge, P. , Metzger, M. , & Geider, K. (1997). Genetics of sorbitol metabolism in Erwinia amylovora and its influence on bacterial virulence. Molecular and General Genetics, 256, 611–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arias, C. R. , Olivares‐Fuster, O. , Hayden, K. , Shoemaker, C. A. , Grizzle, J. M. , & Klesius, P. H. (2007). First report of Yersinia ruckeri biotype 2 in the USA. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, 19, 35–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, D. A. , Robertson, P. A. , & Austin, B. (2003). Recovery of a new biogroup of Yersinia ruckeri from diseases rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 26, 127–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bastardo, A. , Ravelo, C. , & Romalde, J. L. (2015). Phylogeography of Yersinia ruckeri reveals effects of past evolutionary events on the current strain distribution and explains variations in the global transmission of enteric redmouth (ERM) disease. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, 1198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brettin, T. , Davis, J. J. , Disz, T. , Edwards, R. A. , Gerdes, S. , Olsen, G. J. , … Xia, F. (2015). RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Scientific Reports, 5, 8365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calvez, S. , Gantelet, H. , Blanc, G. , Douet, D. , & Daniel, P. (2014). Yersinia ruckeri biotypes 1 and 2 in France: Presence and antibiotic susceptibility. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 109, 117–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, H. , & Boutros, P. C. (2011). VennDiagram: A package for the generation of highly‐customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Darling, A. C. E. , Mau, B. , Blattner, F. R. , & Perna, N. T. (2004). Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Research, 14, 1394–1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, R. L. , & Frerichs, G. N. (1989). Morphological and biochemical differences among isolates of Yersinia ruckeri obtained from wide geographical areas. Journal of Fish Diseases, 12, 357–365. [Google Scholar]
  10. Emmerth, M. , Goebel, W. , Miller, S. I. , & Hueck, C. J. (1999). Genomic subtraction identifies Salmonella typhimurium prophages, F‐related plasmid sequences, and a novel fimbrial operon, stf, which are absent in Salmonella typhi . Journal of Bacteriology, 181, 5652–5661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fouz, B. , Zarza, C. , & Amaro, C. (2006). First description of non‐motile Yersinia ruckeri serovar I strains causing disease in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), cultured in Spain. Journal of Fish Diseases, 29, 339–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frees, D. , Gerth, U. , & Ingmer, H. (2014). Clp chaperones and proteases are central in stress survival, virulence and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus . International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 304, 142–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Furones, M. D. , Gilpin, M. J. , Alderman, D. J. , & Munn, C. B. (1990). Virulence of Yersinia ruckeri serotype I strains is associated with a heat sensitive factor (HSF) in cell extracts. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 54, 339–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gray, M. J. , Freitag, N. E. , & Boor, K. J. (2006). How the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes mediates the switch from environmental Dr. Jekyll to pathogenic Mr Hyde. Infection and Immunity, 74, 2505–2512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kok, M. , Bühlmann, E. , & Pechère, J.C . (2001). Salmonella typhimurium thyA mutants fail to grow intracellularly in vitro and are attenuated in mice. Microbiology (Reading, England), 147, 727–733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kriegeskorte, A. , Block, D. , Drescher, M. , Windmüller, N. , Mellmann, A. , Baum, C. , … Kahl, B. C. (2014). Inactivation of thyA in Staphylococcus aureus attenuates virulence and has a strong impact on metabolism and virulence gene expression. MBio, 5, e01447–1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, L. , Chi, H. , & Sun, L. (2015). Pseudomonas fluorescens: Identification of Fur‐regulated proteins and evaluation of their contribution to pathogenesis. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 115, 67–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Méndez, J. , Fernández, L. , Menéndez, A. , Reimundo, P. , Pérez‐Pascual, D. , Navais, R. , & Guijarro, J. A. (2009). A chromosomally located traHIJKCLMN operon encoding a putative type IV secretion system is involved in the virulence of Yersinia ruckeri . Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 937–945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meredith, T. C. , & Woodard, R. W. (2005). Identification of GutQ from Escherichia coli as a D‐arabinose 5‐phosphate isomerase. Journal of Bacteriology, 187, 6936–6942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moisi, M. , Lichtenegger, S. , Tutz, S. , Seper, A. , Schild, S. , & Reidl, J. (2013). Characterizing the hexose‐6‐phosphate transport system of Vibrio cholerae, a utilization system for carbon and phosphate sources. Journal of Bacteriology, 195, 1800–1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Morrison, M. J. , & Imperiali, B. (2014). The renaissance of bacillosamine and its derivatives: Pathway characterization and implications in pathogenicity. Biochemistry, 53, 624–638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Romalde, J. L. , Magariños, B. , Barja, J. L. , & Toranzo, A. E. (1993). Antigenic and molecular characterization of Yersinia ruckeri proposal for a new intraspecies classification. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 16, 411–419. [Google Scholar]
  23. Romalde, J. L. , Planas, E. , Sotelo, J. M. , & Toranzo, A. E. (2003). First description of Yersinia ruckeri serotype O2 in Spain. Bulletin European Association of Fish Pathologists, 23, 135–138. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ross, A. J. , Rucker, R. R. , & Ewing, W. H. (1966). Description of a bacterium associated with redmouth disease of rainbow trout (Salmo Gairdneri). Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 12, 763–770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Srikhanta, Y. N. , Fox, K. L. , & Jennings, M. P. (2010). The phasevarion: Phase variation of type III DNA methyltransferases controls coordinated switching in multiple genes. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 8, 196–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tang, K. F. J. , & Lightner, D. V. (2014). Homologues of insecticidal toxin complex genes within a genomic island in the marine bacterium Vibrio parahaemolyticus . FEMS Microbiology Letters, 361, 34–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Urbany, C. , & Neuhaus, H. E. (2008). Citrate uptake into Pectobacterium atrosepticum is critical for bacterial virulence. Molecular Plant‐Microbe Interactions, 21, 547–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, X. , Kim, Y. , Hong, S. H. , Ma, Q. , Brown, B. L. , Pu, M. , … Wood, T. K. (2011). Antitoxin MqsA helps mediate the bacterial general stress response. Nature Chemical Biology, 7, 359–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yamada, M. , & Saier, M. H. (1987). Physical and genetic characterization of the glucitol operon in Escherichia coli . Journal of Bacteriology, 169, 2990–2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zebian, N. , Merkx‐Jacques, A. , Pittock, P. P. , Houle, S. , Dozois, C. M. , Lajoie, G. A. , & Creuzenet, C. (2016). Comprehensive analysis of flagellin glycosylation in Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 reveals incorporation of legionaminic acid and its importance for host colonization. Glycobiology, 26, 386–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

 


Articles from MicrobiologyOpen are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES