Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Aug 10;5(32):e00690-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00690-17

Genome Sequences of Mycobacteriophages Kerberos, Pomar16, and StarStuff

Deborah Jacobs-Sera a, Oana Catinas b, Mariceli Fernandez-Martinez c, Amelia Garcia d, Rebecca A Garlena a, Carlos A Guerrero Bustamante a, Michelle H Larsen e, Rosa H Medellin d, Martin Y Melendez-Ortiz c, Crystal M Melendez-Rivera c, Alondra K Mercado-Andino c, Abner J Mercado-Delgado c, Cathia P Ortiz-Ortiz c, Ana M Quesada-Gordillo c, Jacqueline M Ramos d, Michael R Rubin c, Daniel A Russell a, Rachna A Sadana d, Sanghamitra Saha d, Edwin Vazquez c, David Villarreal d, Graham F Hatfull a,
PMCID: PMC5552978  PMID: 28798169

ABSTRACT

We describe the genome sequences of three closely related mycobacteriophages, Kerberos, Pomar16, and StarStuff, isolated at similar times but from geographically distinct regions. All three genomes are similar to those of other subcluster A2 phages, such as L5 and D29, are temperate, and have siphoviral virion morphologies.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

A large collection of sequenced mycobacteriophages—phages that infect mycobacterial hosts—reveals them to span a spectrum of genetic diversity (1). They can be grouped into clusters (some of which are divided into subclusters) and singletons according to their overall relatedness (2), and the collection of over 1,300 sequenced phages currently spans 26 clusters and 6 singletons (http://phagesdb.org). Most of these phages were isolated on a single host strain (Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155), and approximately 10% of the phages efficiently infect Mycobacterium tuberculosis mc27000. For some other phages, host range expansion mutants that efficiently infect M. tuberculosis can be isolated (3). Those phages that efficiently infect M. tuberculosis map within subclusters A2 and A3 and all subclusters within cluster K (3). Mycobacteriophages not only have provided insights into phage diversity and evolution but also have been exploited for various tools and applications (4), including the use of D29 in a rapid amplification strategy for tuberculosis diagnosis (5).

In 2015, phages Kerberos, Pomar16, and StarStuff were isolated on M. smegmatis mc2155 using soil samples and an enrichment procedure. The samples were collected in geographically distinct regions, Kerberos from Houston, TX, Pomar16 from Aibonito, PR, and StarStuff from Pinetown, South Africa. Following plaque purification and amplification, DNA was isolated and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq 150-bp single-end runs. Trimmed reads were assembled using Newbler, and single contigs were assembled. Genome lengths were 52,753 bp, 52,833 bp, and 52,785 bp, and read coverages were 506, 564, and 3,354 for Kerberos, Pomar16, and StarStuff, respectively. All three phages have defined ends with 10-base 3′ single-stranded DNA extensions (5′-CGGTCGGTTA), and all are approximately 63.5% G+C. Electron microscopy shows that all three phages have siphoviral morphologies with icosahedral heads approximately 55 nm in diameter and flexible noncontractile tails approximately 110 nm long.

All three genomes were annotated using DNA Master (http://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/), Glimmer (6), GeneMark (7), Aragorn (8), tRNAscan-SE (9), BLASTP (10), HHPred (11), and Phamerator (12). BlastN comparisons showed that the three genomes are very closely related to each other and have greater than 98% nucleotide identity across their entire genome spans. Each genome contains 93 protein-coding genes and 5 tRNA genes. Their overall genome architectures are similar to those of other subcluster A2 phages, including L5 and D29 (13, 14), with rightward-transcribed virion structure and assembly genes in the left arms and leftward-transcribed nonstructural genes in the right arms. All encode a putative repressor protein with similarity to the L5 repressor (78% amino acid identity). The integration systems are closely related to those of D29 and are predicted to use the same attB site for integration.

The genome most closely related to Kerberos, Pomar16, and StarStuff is phage D29, which was previously shown to contain a 3.6-kbp deletion when aligned to phage L5 (14). Thus, all three genomes are likely to be very close relatives of the putative temperate parent of D29.

Accession number(s).

Pomar16, Kerberos, and StarStuff are available at GenBank with accession numbers KX574455, KX758538, and KX897981, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM116884) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (54308198) to G.F.H. and from the University of Puerto Rico at Cayey to M.R.R. and E.V.

Footnotes

Citation Jacobs-Sera D, Catinas O, Fernandez-Martinez M, Garcia A, Garlena RA, Guerrero Bustamante CA, Larsen MH, Medellin RH, Melendez-Ortiz MY, Melendez-Rivera CM, Mercado-Andino AK, Mercado-Delgado AJ, Ortiz-Ortiz CP, Quesada-Gordillo AM, Ramos JM, Rubin MR, Russell DA, Sadana RA, Saha S, Vazquez E, Villarreal D, Hatfull GF. 2017. Genome sequences of mycobacteriophages Kerberos, Pomar16, and StarStuff. Genome Announc 5:e00690-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00690-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pope WH, Bowman CA, Russell DA, Jacobs-Sera D, Asai DJ, Cresawn SG, Jacobs WR, Hendrix RW, Lawrence JG, Hatfull GF; Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science, Phage Hunters Integrating Research and Education, Mycobacterial Genetics Course . 2015. Whole genome comparison of a large collection of mycobacteriophages reveals a continuum of phage genetic diversity. eLife 4:e06416. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hatfull GF, Jacobs-Sera D, Lawrence JG, Pope WH, Russell DA, Ko CC, Weber RJ, Patel MC, Germane KL, Edgar RH, Hoyte NN, Bowman CA, Tantoco AT, Paladin EC, Myers MS, Smith AL, Grace MS, Pham TT, O’Brien MB, Vogelsberger AM, Hryckowian AJ, Wynalek JL, Donis-Keller H, Bogel MW, Peebles CL, Cresawn SG, Hendrix RW. 2010. Comparative genomic analysis of 60 mycobacteriophage genomes: genome clustering, gene acquisition, and gene size. J Mol Biol 397:119–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jacobs-Sera D, Marinelli LJ, Bowman C, Broussard GW, Guerrero Bustamante C, Boyle MM, Petrova ZO, Dedrick RM, Pope WH; Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science Sea-Phages Program, Modlin RL, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2012. On the nature of mycobacteriophage diversity and host preference. Virology 434:187–201. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hatfull GF. 2014. Mycobacteriophages: windows into tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003953. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilson SM, al-Suwaidi Z, McNerney R, Porter J, Drobniewski F. 1997. Evaluation of a new rapid bacteriophage-based method for the drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Med 3:465–468. doi: 10.1038/nm0497-465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Borodovsky M, McIninch J. 1993. Recognition of genes in DNA sequence with ambiguities. Biosystems 30:161–171. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(93)90068-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. TRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hatfull GF, Sarkis GJ. 1993. DNA sequence, structure and gene expression of mycobacteriophage L5: a phage system for mycobacterial genetics. Mol Microbiol 7:395–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ford ME, Sarkis GJ, Belanger AE, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 1998. Genome structure of mycobacteriophage D29: implications for phage evolution. J Mol Biol 279:143–164. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES