Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Aug 11;7:7946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08709-0

Nanometer size silicon particles for hyperpolarized MRI

Grzegorz Kwiatkowski 1, Fabian Jähnig 2, Jonas Steinhauser 1, Patrick Wespi 1, Matthias Ernst 2, Sebastian Kozerke 1,
PMCID: PMC5554256  PMID: 28801662

Abstract

Hyperpolarized silicon particles have been shown to exhibit long spin-lattice relaxation times at room temperature, making them interesting as novel MRI probes. Demonstrations of hyperpolarized silicon particle imaging have focused on large micron size particles (average particle size (APS) = 2.2 μm) as they have, to date, demonstrated much larger polarizations than nanoparticles. We show that also much smaller silicon-29 particles (APS = 55 ± 12 nm) can be hyperpolarized with superior properties. A maximum polarization of 12.6% in the solid state is reported with a spin-lattice relaxation time of 42 min at room temperature thereby opening a new window for MRI applications.

Introduction

Theranostics application of micro- and nano-objects is an emerging field in biomedical sciences. In particular, silicon and its derivatives have been employed to constitute a targeted, site-specific platform for possible drug delivery and in-vivo imaging1. Its relatively low toxicity2 and simple surface chemistry3 imply that silicon can be incorporated as a contrast agent in various imaging modalities, including fluorescence4, 5 or radioisotope (PET)6 methods.

For Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) applications, silicon based contrast agents have been obtained by incorporating transition metal ions into a particle’s body7, 8 or by attaching them on its surface9. This results in a shortening of the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation time (T 1) of nearby tissue protons and hence signal amplification in T 1-weighted proton imaging. A direct detection of silicon signals with MRI is however not possible due to the intrinsically low sensitivity of 29Si nuclei, which leads to impractically long acquisition times.

An approach to overcome this limitation is by a use of hyperpolarization10 - a family of techniques in which the nuclear polarization is temporarily increased beyond its equilibrium value, usually by a factor of 103–105. Different physical mechanisms can be employed to increase the nuclear polarization including optical spin-exchange pumping11, hydrogenation reaction12 or direct transfer of spin angular momentum from electron spins (e.g. in stable radicals). The latter mechanism, referred to as Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP), has received particular attention13. Combining low temperature DNP of 13C labeled metabolites with a rapid dissolution of the sample14 allows mapping its metabolic conversion in-vivo, in both spectral and spatial dimensions15. However, the time in which this large polarization can be used is limited by the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation time of the spin species. In the case of 13C nuclei, the imaging window span lasts around 60–120 s16. This time, although short, allows rapid enzymatic reactions, e.g. anaerobic metabolism, to be studied, which can then be further used to characterize pathology of tissue17, 18.

If, however, slow biological processes such as protein-cell binding, intragastric transit or tissue perfusion and exchange are of interest, much longer life times of the hyperpolarized signal are required. To this end, there have been efforts to extend the relaxation times of 1H or 13C nuclei beyond the T 1 limit by storing the magnetization in “long-lived” states19 which are, for symmetry reasons, protected from many relaxation mechanisms. While such an approach works well on some model systems in the laboratory20, 21, in-vivo applications of such concepts have not been demonstrated so far. Accordingly, alternative hyperpolarized MRI contrast agents, characterized by a long lifetime and in-vivo applicability, are desired.

One such potential candidate is silicon in the form of micro and nanoparticles22. Recent results from experiments with micrometer size 29Si particles have shown a lifetime of the hyperpolarized signal on the order of tens of minutes2325, exceeding that of any other 13C based probe reported so far. Therefore, by combining the enhancement of 29Si polarization using DNP together with the long relaxation properties of crystalline silicon, a new, positive, background-free MRI contrast can be obtained. The proof-of-principle studies showed that silicon microparticles can be administrated via either intragastric (I.G.), intraperitoneal (I.P.) or intravenous (I.V.) routes without loss of any of the long-lived properties26. However, the reported studies were only able to incorporate large, micrometer-size particles that are of limited biomedical application due to their restricted distribution within the tissues. Data using nanometer-size particles revealed rather poor performance, exhibiting short T 1 relaxation time and/or small DNP enhancement, which are not sufficient for in-vivo MRI applications27, 28.

The objective of the present work is to introduce nanometer-size silicon particles obtained with laser ablation and demonstrate their suitability for MRI upon hyperpolarization.

Results

Silicon nanoparticles

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging of the examined silicon powder sample yielded an average particle size (APS) of 55 ± 12 nm (Fig. 1). Each particle is composed of an elemental silicon bulk (predominantly in a crystalline phase) and an oxidized layer on the surface. The naturally occurring defects29, 30 (dangling bonds) between crystalline silicon and silicon dioxide serve as a source of polarization that can be transferred to 29Si nuclei by dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) using microwave irradiation (see Supplementary Information S1). Accordingly, no doping of the sample with exogenous radicals as well as glassing solvents are required.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) TEM image of dry silicon nanopowder. (B) Size distribution obtained from 10 subsequent TEM images.

Hyperpolarization of silicon nanoparticles

The 29Si nuclear polarization could be significantly enhanced using dynamic nuclear polarization. The time constant of the polarization build-up was ~4.5 h and did not depend on the microwave power. Such a long time constant for the build-up of the bulk polarization is attributed to slow spin diffusion from the polarized surface atoms to the bulk 29Si in the interior of a particle. Spin diffusion is limited by the relatively low concentration of 29Si nuclei at natural abundance (4.7%). The maximum achievable polarization for dry material could be substantially enhanced by employing a frequency-modulation scheme31, 32 and a 1 W power amplifier (Fig. 2), resulting in a final polarization level of 12.6%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Build-up curves of 29Si nuclear polarization using 200 mW microwave power (black), additional microwave modulation (red) and with a 1 W power amplifier and microwave modulation (blue). Maximum achievable polarization was 12.6%.

The silicon nanoparticles exhibit a long T 1 relaxation time of 42.3 ± 0.1 min (Fig. 3A). Such a long depolarization time enabled the observation of 29Si NMR signal (SNR > 3) more than 5 h after transfer to the imaging system (Fig. 3B). The presence of PEG polymer on the surface of the nanoparticles resulted in shortening of T 1 relaxation times at room temperature from 42.3 ± 0.1 min to 34.0 ± 0.3 min (Fig. 3A), while no change in the polarization level was observed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Comparison of T 1 relaxation between pure (black) and PEG functionalized (red) silicon nanoparticles. The Fourier-transformed FID signal acquired at t = 1 min (B) and t = 5.2 h (C) at room temperature using a 9.4 T imaging system.

MR imaging

High quality images were obtained by exploiting the long dephasing time of silicon nuclei which has been shown to occur under periodic excitation33 (Fig. 4). Due to relatively small nuclear dipolar interaction, the spin echo can be fully re-phased with a standard CPMG sequence, increasing decoherence (T 2) time by a factor of more than a hundred34.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Three consecutive images of a dry powder obtained after 1 min, 2 h and 4 h after the transfer to the imaging system. Each sample was polarized for 24 h before imaging. (B) Decay of average SNR/pixel with time after transferring the sample to the imaging system.

The sensitivity of the recorded signal was probed as a function of the waiting time after sample transfer to the imaging system to test the time available for the nanoparticles to be distributed within the tissue. As expected, the mean SNR/pixel value decayed with time given by the T 1 relaxation time (Fig. 4B) but nevertheless providing sufficient SNR for imaging after four hours.

Imaging of silicon in PBS buffer resulted in images of good quality, with the shape of the phantom clearly visible (Fig. 5) without any thresholding or extensive post-processing. The gradient of the signal intensity over the sample is due to the majority of the emulsion aggregating in the lower part of the vial.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Image of 30 mg of functionalized silicon nanoparticles dispersed in 500 μl of water. The sample was polarized for t = 8 h. The image was taken immediately after transfer of the sample to the imaging system. The red overlay indicates the outline of the water vial into which the silicon was dispersed.

Discussion

Early reports of hyperpolarized silicon particles demonstrated MRI feasibility of large particles (APS = 2.2 μm, obtained with ball-milling of a silicon ingot), while nanometer-size material showed relatively poor performance with T 1 relaxation on the order of a few minutes27, 28. MRI has not been possible with the nanometer-size particles due to intrinsically low achievable polarization levels35. In contrast, the nanoparticles used in the present study show superior quality in both relaxation time (42 min for pure particles) and polarization level (12.6%), allowing high quality images to be obtained up to four hours after transportation to the imaging system. In this respect, the data presented here significantly outperforms the initial results in ref. 26, where the image could only be acquired after up to 1.5 h following the transfer.

A further significant increase in the achievable polarization level is expected by lowering the temperature during the DNP process. Using a dedicated long-run helium bath or helium-free cryostat will allow for DNP at significantly lower temperature (<2 K) for virtually any time period, boosting the obtainable 29Si polarization. Moreover, conducting the DNP process at higher magnetic fields is expected to additionally contribute to higher final nuclear polarization. Currently, the limited availability of high-power microwave sources operating at frequencies above 100 GHz presents the major obstacle.

Large particles, especially in the micrometer size range, are difficult to administer and handle in-vivo. Issues include blockage of nearby veins and arteries or sedimentation at the site of injection resulting in poor bio-distribution and -compatibility. The small size of the nanoparticles presented here should facilitate greater in vivo mobility5.

A particular advantage of using silicon as a contrast agent is its versatility of surface chemistry36. As it has been shown, the attachment of functional organic molecules on the surface of particles does not significantly reduce any of the desired NMR properties. Further development will be focused on the applications of a specific surface functionalization to produce targeted probes.

The discrepancy between the mean SNR/pixel obtained for dry sample and nanoparticles dispersed in a solution arises not only from the dilution factor and reduced polarization time but also due to an additional polarization loss that occurs when the material is dispersed in a solvent (Fig. S5). A potential cause of this behavior could be due to a temporary increase in relaxation caused by rapid boost in rotational motion of silicon nanoparticles. Nonetheless, this process needs further investigation. Application of a dedicated instrument that allows for rapid flushing of the dry material will reduce the time of dissolution and is hence expected to preserve nuclear polarization better in the future.

Conclusion

In this work, nanometer size silicon nanoparticles with favorable relaxation properties have been polarized beyond previous limits and imaged successfully demonstrating their potential as contrast agents for MRI applications.

Materials and Methods

Silicon nanoparticles

Silicon nano-powder, synthesized from a gas phase using a laser-assisted technique, (US Nano Research, Houston, TX, USA) was used without further modification. The silicon particles are characterized by an elemental purity of >99.99% and 29Si natural abundance of 4.7%. The advantages of using silicon particles obtained with a laser-assisted technique include narrow-size distribution, high purity and relatively large crystalline size, especially compared to ball-milled silicon37.

Hyperpolarization

A home-built polarizer operating at B 0 = 3.4 T at a temperature of ~3.5 K was used38. The sample was composed of 100 mg tightly packed powder enclosed in a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) cup. To enhance polarization, the microwave field was frequency-modulated31, 32 using a symmetric ramp function with a frequency ν = 3 kHz and a bandwidth of 150 MHz. An additional boost in microwave power was achieved by feeding the output of the microwave source (ELVA-1 VCOM-10/94/200-DD, max power 200 mW) into a 95 GHz 1 W power amplifier (QuinStar, Torrance, USA). For measurements in the solid state, a probe with a solenoid coil wound around the sample cup was used. The microwave field was delivered by direct irradiation from the waveguide elbow. The absolute value of polarization in the solid state was obtained by comparing the integrated signal intensity of the hyperpolarized sample with the thermal-equilibrium signal of 100 mg fully labelled silicon at 295 K (99% of 29Si, Isofelx, Moscow, Russia).

MR Imaging

For measurements of dissolved samples in the imaging system, a probe with a custom-design, quasi-cavity structure was used to ensure a homogenous microwave B 1 field profile and hence even distribution of polarization throughout the sample38. All imaging experiments were conducted following the same protocol. After 24 h of continuous polarization, the samples were taken out of the polarizer and immediately transferred to the face of a horizontal 9.4 T imaging system (Bruker BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany). The sample was placed in a home-built, semi half-saddle surface coil (operating at Larmor frequency ν = 79 MHz, 44 × 44 mm2 size). Silicon imaging was performed using the Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes (RARE) sequence39. The dry samples were imaged with a 32 × 32 matrix and 55% partial Fourier, while the dispersed samples were imaged with a 64 × 64 matrix and 71% partial Fourier. A standard RARE sequence provided in ParaVision® 6.0 was used with the following parameters: TE/TR = 2.75/51.75 ms, excitation pulse length = 230 μs, refocusing pulse length = 350 μs, FOV = 60 × 60 mm, slice thickness = 15 mm. For post-processing the raw data were imported into an in-house developed Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, USA) code. The frequency domain data has been apodized with a Hamming window and zero filled to a 512 × 512 matrix. Silicon spectroscopy was recorded with a train of low-angle (θ = 10°, TR = 8 min) pulses over an 8 h period.

Surface modification

To improve the biodistribution and biocompatibility of the nanoparticles, the surface of silicon nanoparticles was functionalized with polyethylene glycol40 (see Supplementary Information S2 for details). As a proof-of-principle for in-vivo applications, the surface-modified silicon nanoparticles were imaged after dispersion in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The amount of material was reduced to 30 mg (60 mg/mL), and in addition, the polarization time was also reduced to 8 h, which should allow for two-shift operation of the DNP polarizer.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).

Electronic supplementary material

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Yevhen Polyhach for sharing his expertise in EPR spectroscopy and recording EPR spectra of silicon nano particles. Fabian Starsich is thanked for help with XRD and Anastasia Spyrogianni for help with DLS measurements. Frank Krumeich and ScopeM Scientific Center for Optical and Electron Microscopy at ETH Zurich is acknowledge for help with TEM imaging. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 320030_153014, 200021_149707 and 200020_169879).

Author Contributions

S.K., M.E. and G.K. designed the study. G.K. conducted the study, processed data and prepared the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08709-0

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Tasciotti E, et al. Mesoporous silicon particles as a multistage delivery system for imaging and therapeutic applications. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008;3:151–7. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ehlerding EB, Chen F, Cai W. Biodegradable and Renal Clearable Inorganic Nanoparticles. Adv. Sci. 2016;3 doi: 10.1002/advs.201500223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dasog, M., Kehrle, J., Rieger, B. & Veinot, J. G. C. Silicon nanocrystals and silicon-polymer hybrids: Synthesis, surface engineering, and applications. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed.55, 2322–2339 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Tasciotti E, et al. Near-infrared imaging method for the in vivo assessment of the biodistribution of nanoporous silicon particles. Mol. Imaging. 2011;10:56–68. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Park J-H, et al. Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nat. Mater. 2009;8:331–6. doi: 10.1038/nmat2398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tu C, Ma X, House A, Kauzlarich SM, Louie AY. PET imaging and biodistribution of silicon quantum dots in mice. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011;2:285–288. doi: 10.1021/ml1002844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tu, C., Ma, X., Pantazis, P., Kauzlarich, S. M. & Angelique, Y. Paramagnetic, silicon quantum dots for magnetic resonance and two photon imaging of macrophages. J. Am. Chem. S 2016–2023 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Singh MP, et al. Development of iron-doped silicon nanoparticles as bimodal imaging agents. ACS Nano. 2012;6:5596–5604. doi: 10.1021/nn301536n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gizzatov A, et al. Geometrical confinement of Gd(DOTA) molecules within mesoporous silicon nanoconstructs for MR imaging of cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;352:97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nikolaou P, Goodson BM, Chekmenev EY. NMR hyperpolarization techniques for biomedicine. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2015;21:3156–3166. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kauczor HU, Surkau R, Roberts T. MRI using hyperpolarized noble gases. Eur. Radiol. 1998;8:820–7. doi: 10.1007/s003300050479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Natterer J, Bargon J. Parahydrogen induced polarization. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1997;31:293–315. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6565(97)00007-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Abragam A, Goldman M. Principles of dynamic nuclear polarisation. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1978;41:396–467. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/41/3/002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10158–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Brindle KM. Biomedical applications of hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2009;55:285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2009.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keshari, K. R. & Wilson, D. M. Chemistry and biochemistry of 13C hyperpolarized magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization. Chemical Society reviews 43, (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Rider OJ, Tyler DJ. Clinical implications of cardiac hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2013;15 doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nelson SJ, et al. Metabolic Imaging of Patients with Prostate Cancer Using Hyperpolarized [1- 13 C] Pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:1–10. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pileio G, Carravetta M, Levitt MH. Storage of nuclear magnetization as long-lived singlet order in low magnetic field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010;107:17135–17139. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010570107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Levitt MH. Singlet nuclear magnetic resonance. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2012;63:89–105. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bornet A, Sarkar R, Bodenhausen G. Life-times of long-lived coherences under different motional regimes. J. Magn. Reson. 2010;206:154–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O’Farrell N, Houlton A, Horrocks B. Silicon nanoparticles: applications in cell biology and medicine. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2006;1:451–472. doi: 10.2147/nano.2006.1.4.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aptekar JW, et al. Silicon nanoparticles as hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging agents. ACS Nano. 2009;3:4003–4008. doi: 10.1021/nn900996p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Whiting N, et al. Real-Time MRI-Guided Catheter Tracking Using Hyperpolarized Silicon Particles. Sci. Rep. 2015;5 doi: 10.1038/srep12842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee M, Cassidy MC, Ramanathan C, Marcus CM. Decay of nuclear hyperpolarization in silicon microparticles. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011;84:33–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cassidy MC, Chan HR, Ross BD, Bhattacharya PK, Marcus CM. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of hyperpolarized silicon particles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013;8:363–368. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Whiting N, et al. Proc. SPIE. 2015. Developing hyperpolarized silicon particles for advanced biomedical imaging applications; p. 941702. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Whiting N, et al. Developing hyperpolarized silicon particles for in vivo MRI targeting of ovarian cancer. J. Med. Imag. 2016;3 doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.036001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Poindexter EH, Caplan PJ. Characterization of Si/SiO2 Interface Defects by Electron Spin Resonance. Prog. Surf. Sci. 1983;14:201–294. doi: 10.1016/0079-6816(83)90006-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Caplan PJ, Helbert JN, Wagner BE, Poindexter EH. Paramagnetic defects in silicon/silicon dioxide systems. Surf. Sci. 1976;54:33–42. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(76)90085-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hovav Y, Feintuch A, Vega S, Goldfarb D. Dynamic nuclear polarization using frequency modulation at 3.34 T. J. Magn. Reson. 2014;238:94–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bornet A, et al. Microwave Frequency Modulation to Enhance Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014;602:63–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dementyev AE, Li D, MacLean K, Barrett SE. Anomalies in the NMR of Silicon: Unexpected Spin Echoes in a Dilute Dipolar Solid. Phys. Rev. B. 2003;68:153302–153306. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.153302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li D, et al. Intrinsic origin of spin echoes in dipolar solids generated by strong π pulses. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008;77:1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Atkins TM, et al. Synthesis of Long T 1 Silicon Nanoparticles for Hyperpolarized 29 Si Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ACS Nano. 2013;7:1609–1617. doi: 10.1021/nn305462y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim ES, Russ Algar W, L. B. Functionalizing Nanoparticles with Biological Molecules: Developing Chemistries that Facilitate Nanotechnology. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;113:1904–2074. doi: 10.1021/cr300143v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shen TD, Koch CC, Mccormick TL, Nemanich RJ. The structure and property characteristics of amorphous / nanocrystalline silicon produced by ball milling. J. Mater. Res. 1995;10:139–148. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1995.0139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Batel M, et al. A multi-sample 94 GHz dissolution dynamic-nuclear-polarization system. J. Magn. Reson. 2012;214:166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hennig J, Nauerth A. RARE Imaging: A Fast Imaging Method for Clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 1986;3:823–833. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910030602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sudeep PK, Page Z, Emrick T. PEGylated silicon nanoparticles: synthesis and characterization. Chem. Commun. 2008;46:6126–6127. doi: 10.1039/b813025f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES