Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2017 Aug 11;8:1506. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01506

Seasonal Analysis of Microbial Communities in Precipitation in the Greater Tokyo Area, Japan

Satoshi Hiraoka 1,*, Masaya Miyahara 1, Kazushi Fujii 1, Asako Machiyama 2,3, Wataru Iwasaki 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC5554504  PMID: 28848519

Abstract

The presence of microbes in the atmosphere and their transport over long distances across the Earth's surface was recently shown. Precipitation is likely a major path by which aerial microbes fall to the ground surface, affecting its microbial ecosystems and introducing pathogenic microbes. Understanding microbial communities in precipitation is of multidisciplinary interest from the perspectives of microbial ecology and public health; however, community-wide and seasonal analyses have not been conducted. Here, we carried out 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of 30 precipitation samples that were aseptically collected over 1 year in the Greater Tokyo Area, Japan. The precipitation microbial communities were dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria and were overall consistent with those previously reported in atmospheric aerosols and cloud water. Seasonal variations in composition were observed; specifically, Proteobacteria abundance significantly decreased from summer to winter. Notably, estimated ordinary habitats of precipitation microbes were dominated by animal-associated, soil-related, and marine-related environments, and reasonably consistent with estimated air mass backward trajectories. To our knowledge, this is the first amplicon-sequencing study investigating precipitation microbial communities involving sampling over the duration of a year.

Keywords: microbial ecology, precipitation, long-distance transportation, ice nucleation activity, habitat estimation

Introduction

Microbes are present and move around nearly everywhere in the Earth. Aerial microbes have received considerable attention within this context because the atmosphere not only is an unusual habitat for microbes but also likely represents a path by which microbes move exceptionally long distances (Kellogg and Griffin, 2006; Burrows et al., 2009; Després et al., 2012; Smith, 2013; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016). To date, several studies have investigated aerial microbial communities on airborne particles and in clouds using culture-dependent and independent techniques (Bowers et al., 2011a,b, 2013; Vaïtilingom et al., 2012; Zweifel et al., 2012; DeLeon-Rodriguez et al., 2013; Woo et al., 2013; Dong et al., 2016), and revealed that aerial microbes can originate from terrestrial habitats, including plant surfaces (Bowers et al., 2009, 2011a,b). The long-distance transport of aerial microbes has also been reported, for example from Chinese deserts to Japan over the east Eurasian continent and the Sea of Japan (Echigo et al., 2005; Maki et al., 2011). Pathogens in the atmosphere may be transported over long distances, as integrated simulation analyses of climate and disease propagation suggest the involvement of aerial microbes in human diseases (Rodó et al., 2011, 2014). Likewise, the outbreak of several plant infections due to aerial microbes transported beyond borders and seas has been hypothesized (Fitt et al., 1989; Brown and Hovmøller, 2002).

Precipitation, i.e., rainfall and snowfall, would bring aerial microbes in the troposphere to the ground surface. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has detected pathogenic bacterial sequences in precipitation samples (Kaushik et al., 2012), implicating that precipitation may alter microbial ecosystems on the ground (Hervàs et al., 2009; Peter et al., 2014). In the reverse direction, aerial microbes impact the climate by accelerating cloud formation and precipitation, known as “bioprecipitation” (Hamilton and Lenton, 1998; Christner et al., 2008; Konstantinidis, 2014; Morris et al., 2014; Stopelli et al., 2015; Hara et al., 2016). Several microbial species experimentally exhibit ice nucleation activity (INA), which is the ability to accelerate ice nucleation at relatively warm temperatures by producing so-called INA proteins (Hoose and Möhler, 2012). Such INA microbes are broadly distributed among bacteria and fungi and have been isolated from precipitation and cloud water (Mortazavi et al., 2008; Joly et al., 2013). In addition, microbes in clouds may affect the chemical composition of clouds via carbon (Amato et al., 2007; Vaïtilingom et al., 2013) and nitrogen metabolism (Hill et al., 2007). Thus, a basic understanding of microbial communities in precipitation provides important knowledge regarding microbial ecology, public health, and even meteorology. To date, several cloning-based (Ahern et al., 2007; Zweifel et al., 2012; Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2013; Peter et al., 2014) and community-wide but short-term (Cho and Jang, 2014; Kaushik et al., 2014) analyses of microbial communities in precipitation have been carried out. However, community-wide and seasonal analyses have not been conducted.

Here, we conducted 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) amplicon-sequencing analysis of 30 precipitation samples that were aseptically collected over 1 year in the Greater Tokyo Area, Japan. Microbial community analysis revealed seasonal variations in their composition. Notably, the estimated original habitats of precipitation microbes showed reasonable consistency with estimated air mass backward trajectories. Our results support a precipitation-mediated microbial cycle model in which soil, oceanic, and animal-associated microbes are spread in the atmosphere, transported for long distances, and deposited via precipitation.

Materials and methods

Precipitation sampling

Precipitation samples were collected at two sites in the Greater Tokyo Area, Japan: Kashiwa (35°54′00″N, 139°55′59″E, 50 m above sea level) and Hongo (35°42′55”N, 139°45'56″E, 30 m above sea level) (Figure 1). The Kashiwa site was on the roof of a seven-story building on the Kashiwa campus, the University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan, which is surrounded by residences, farms, and woods in a suburb of Tokyo. The Hongo site was on the roof of a five-story building on the Hongo campus, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, which is located in downtown Tokyo. The sites are 25.5 km apart and neither geologically nor meteorologically separated in the Kanto plain. The upper areas of both sites are wide open and lack any obstructing buildings or structures that would contaminate the precipitation samples. At the Kashiwa site, precipitation was aseptically collected using a US-330 automatic precipitation sampler (Ogasawara Keiki, Tokyo, Japan) following the method of Kaushik et al. (2012). This device consists of a sterile and disposable bottle inside a 4°C refrigerator and automatically collects precipitation by opening the lid only when a sensor detects precipitation. At the Hongo site, precipitation samples were manually collected into a sterile and disposable bottle on ice and immediately stored in a 4°C refrigerator. At both sites, every part of the collection equipment that potentially directly contacted precipitation samples (e.g., disposable collection bottles and channel tubes) was sterilized by gamma rays in advance of each sample collection. The precipitation samples were pre-filtered through 5-μm membrane filters, and microbial cells were collected using 0.22-μm Sterivex filters (Millipore, USA). The Sterivex filters were promptly moved to a −20°C freezer and stored until DNA extraction. Precipitation sampling required no special permission. To prepare negative control samples, we poured 1 L of Milli-Q purified water into the collection equipment and carried out filtration in the same manner.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A map of the sampling sites (Kashiwa and Hongo, yellow) and meteorological observatories (Abiko and Tokyo, blue) (left panel), with photos of the sampling sites (right panel). At the Kashiwa site, a US-330 automatic precipitation sampler (Ogasawara Keiki, Tokyo, Japan) was installed. At the Hongo site, precipitation samples were manually collected.

We collected 25 and 5 precipitation samples containing sufficient amounts of microbial DNA at the Kashiwa and Hongo sites, respectively. The sampling dates spanned more than 1 year from May 2014 to October 2015, encompassing the rainy and typhoon seasons in Japan (Table 1; the six digits, letter, and suffix number for each sample name represent the sampling date (YYMMDD), the site (K for Kashiwa and H for Hongo), and the volume (if multiple samples were collected during the same precipitation event). A precipitation event was defined if there was no precipitation 6 h before and after the event. The volumes of collected and filtered precipitation ranged from 50 to 1,000 mL. For correlation analysis with meteorological data, we excluded the data obtained from samples 140630K_50, 140630K _100, 140810K_50, and 140810K_100, which were retrieved as replicate samples with different volumes. Eight negative control samples were also collected at different dates at the Kashiwa and Hongo sites.

Table 1.

Sequencing statistics and meteorological characteristics of each precipitation sample.

Sample Sampling time (YYMMDD)a Note Amount of precipitation [mm] Temperature [°C] Atmospheric pressure Wind speed [m/s] Filtration volume [mL] Raw reads Effective reads OTUs Shannon's diversity index
140521K 140521(01:00)–140521(18:00) – 36 16.56 994.31 3.16 50 8,340 246 44 2.62
140630K_50 140628(01:00)–140630(05:00) Rainy season 22 21.98 999.23 1.74 50 8,622 1,092 27 1.63
140630K_100 140628(01:00)–140630(05:00) Rainy season 22 21.98 999.23 1.74 100 7,444 1,287 39 1.26
140630K_200 140628(01:00)–140630(05:00) Rainy season 22 21.98 999.23 1.74 200 7,462 1,118 44 1.48
140810K_50 140810(00:00)–141810(23:00) Typhoon 31.5 25.46 998.46 3.89 50 7,621 275 76 3.70
140810K_100 140810(00:00)–141810(23:00) Typhoon 31.5 25.46 998.46 3.89 100 8,441 108 53 4.41
140810K_200 140810(00:00)–141810(23:00) Typhoon 31.5 25.46 998.46 3.89 200 6,664 371 129 3.82
140926K 140925(02:00)–140926(04:00) – 6.5 21.48 1,001.08 2.14 200 1,941 18 15 2.66
141014K 141013(13:00)–141014(07:00) Typhoon 32.5 19.58 992.99 4.47 200 1,641 317 157 4.76
141023K 141021(05:00)–141023(18:00) – 31.5 14.89 1,010.85 2.03 200 1,354 120 54 3.66
150107K 150106(16:00)–150106(18:00) – 4 12.35 992.30 5.10 200 3,410 37 22 2.93
150116K 150115(11:00)–150116(00:00) – 40.5 4.97 1,005.15 3.05 1,000 2,494 72 55 3.86
150202K 150130(05:00)–150130(19:00) Snow 12.5 1.11 1,015.18 2.17 400 9,705 1,256 194 4.69
150409K 150407(03:00)–150408(17:00) – 20.5 6.39 1,017.32 2.13 200 8,337 473 111 4.15
150412K 150410(17:00)–150411(14:00) – 16 8.99 1,018.06 1.60 200 6,805 771 125 4.16
150414K 150413(11:00)–150414(17:00) – 36.5 10.13 1,013.38 1.91 200 5,818 655 116 3.98
150513K 150512(21:00)–150513(01:00) Typhoon 23 20.00 997.43 5.60 200 2,223 47 25 3.92
150604K 150603(08:00)–150603(13:00) Rainy season 13 20.46 998.26 1.44 200 4,663 8 7 2.88
150628K 150626(19:00)–150627(12:00) Rainy season 13.5 20.92 997.42 1.24 150 9,634 284 46 3.41
150711K 150708(15:00)–150709(20:00) Rainy season 17.5 19.27 1,013.22 1.48 200 9,557 31 20 1.91
150718K 150716(04:00)–150717(13:00) Typhoon 16.5 25.99 1,004.62 3.26 200 5,189 5 4 4.03
150816K 150814(05:00)–150814(22:00) – 43 25.11 1,000.38 1.91 200 6,864 269 68 3.05
150827K 150826(00:00)–150826(17:00) Typhoon 27 20.10 1,005.27 1.92 200 7,993 1,041 226 3.39
150926K 150924(19:00)–150926(06:00) – 21 17.63 1,005.28 1.90 200 2,988 6 4 2.75
151014K 151011(01:00)–151011(11:00) – 8 16.94 1,008.92 1.00 200 6,357 129 30 1.33
150414H 150413(07:00)–150414(12:00) – 39.5 10.03 1,014.99 3.15 200 7,215 882 125 3.76
150513H 150512(20:00)–150513(06:00) Typhoon 58.5 20.25 997.43 7.23 200 3,198 59 38 4.83
150627H 150626(15:00)–150627(10:00) Rainy season 16 21.33 998.27 2.22 150 6,450 667 108 1.24
150710H 150708(10:00)–150710(00:00) Rainy season 22 20.20 1,013.22 2.33 200 9,280 159 48 3.00
151014H 151011(02:00)–151011(10:00) – 15 18.01 1,008.80 1.90 200 6,342 286 67 3.70
Open in a new tab
a

The six digits, letter, and suffix number in each sample name represent the sampling date (YYMMDD), the sampling site (K for Kashiwa and H for Hongo), and the filtered sample volume if prepared as a technical replicate with multiple volume sizes (50, 100, and 200 mL).

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Microbial DNA on the Sterivex filters was retrieved using a ChargeSwitch Forensic DNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen) according to the supplier's protocol with one exception: the filters were directly suspended in the extraction solution from the kit during the cell lysis process. The V5-V6 region of the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene was amplified using a standard PCR protocol with TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa) and the following high-performance liquid chromatography-purified primers: 784F (5′- RGGATTAGATACCC -3′) and 1064R (5′- CGACRRCCATGCANCACCT -3′) (Wang and Qian, 2009; Claesson et al., 2010). Amplified DNA was concatenated to multiplex identifier tags that were unique to each sample, and a mixture of 10 samples on average was sequenced in one run on a 454 GS Junior System (Roche) after size selection (350 ± 50 bp). Pre-packaged sterile water for injection (in lieu of water from a laboratory water purification system) was used throughout the DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and DNA library preparation steps to avoid water-mediated contamination.

Bioinformatic analysis

For raw sequence data from both precipitation and negative control samples, sequence regions at both ends that contained low-quality bases (quality score < 20) were trimmed using DynamicTrim (Cox et al., 2010), chimeric sequences were filtered out using UCHIME with default settings (Edgar et al., 2011), and sequences whose lengths were shorter than 150 bp were discarded. All remaining high-quality sequences were clustered with a 97% identity threshold using CD-HIT (Fu et al., 2012). After discarding clusters that contained negative control sequences (Cho and Jang, 2014), each cluster was designated as an operational taxonomic unit (OTU). For hierarchical cluster analysis of the precipitation samples, the Ward method was used based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarities between their OTU compositions. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis was conducted using Bray-Curtis dissimilarities. The taxonomic assignment of each OTU was performed by conducting a BLASTN search (Camacho et al., 2009) against the SILVA database (Quast et al., 2013) and retrieving the top hit sequence that showed e-values ≤ 1E-15. To estimate ordinary habitats for each 16S rRNA sequence, a BLASTN search was performed against MetaMetaDB (Yang and Iwasaki, 2014), and the top hit sequence with an e-value ≤ 1E-10 and an identity ≥ 90% was retrieved. Microbial habitability index (MHI) scores were calculated as previously described (Yang and Iwasaki, 2014).

Amplicon-sequencing data of aerosol and cloud water samples were downloaded from NCBI SRA database (the accession numbers are shown in Supplementary Table S1). Their ordinary habitat analyses were conducted as described above after quality filtering.

Meteorological data analysis

The data on the amount of precipitation, temperature, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure were retrieved from the website of the Japan Meteorological Agency (http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu/menureport.html), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of Japan. Precipitation, wind speed, and temperature data from the Abiko (35°51′48″N, 140°06′36″E; 16.4 km from Kashiwa) and Tokyo (35°41′30″N, 139°45′00″E; 2.9 km from Hongo) observatories were used for the analyses of the Kashiwa and Hongo sites, respectively (Figure 1). Atmospheric pressure data from the Tokyo observatory were used (this observatory is the closest to both sites that records atmospheric pressure data). The wind speed, temperature, and atmospheric pressure data were averaged over the period of each precipitation event. To analyze long-range transport paths of air masses that caused precipitation by providing water vapor, we estimated backward trajectories of an air mass at 2,000 m altitude for 240 h prior to all precipitation events for each sampling site. The trajectories were calculated based on the hybrid single-particle Lagrangian integrated trajectory (HYSPLIT) model (http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php) provided by the Global Data Assimilation System of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA (Stein et al., 2015). The HYSPLIT model uses gridded meteorological data and considers advection and diffusion of air parcels in calculation of their trajectories. This model has been used in a variety of atmospheric simulations focusing on the atmospheric transport, dispersion, and deposition of pollutants and hazardous materials (Stein et al., 2015), while it has also been adopted for estimation of sources of airborne microbes (e.g., Smith et al., 2013; Cho and Jang, 2014; Kobayashi et al., 2015; Xia et al., 2015; Xu et al., 2017).

Data deposition

The amplicon sequence data were deposited in the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank database under BioSample IDs SAMD00059586-SAMD00059614 and SAMD00060461-SAMD00060468. All data were registered under BioProject ID PRJDB5087.

Results and discussion

Amplicon sequencing of precipitation samples

A total of 64,100 high-quality sequences 231 ± 45 bp in length were generated from 30 precipitation and eight negative control samples. The precipitation samples included typhoon rain, rainy season rain, and snow. After removing sequences exhibiting >97% similarity to the negative control samples, 12,089 “effective” sequences comprising 1,297 OTUs remained. To make our analyses based on reads that were not likely from contamination as much as possible, we took a conservative and strict filtering approach, whose extent of read number reduction was similar to that in a previous study (Cho and Jang, 2014). The number of OTUs per sample ranged from 4 to 226 (Table 1). Based on rarefaction curves, the obtained OTUs represented their microbial communities well for some samples, although several samples required additional sequences (Supplementary Figure S1).

Hierarchical cluster analysis of OTU composition in the precipitation samples indicated samples collected during the same precipitation event with different volumes (50, 100, and 200 mL) that were highly similar to each other (Figure 2, open symbols), suggesting that differences in volume have little effect on analysis in the 50–200 mL range. Moreover, microbial communities in samples that were collected on the same day at different sampling sites (Kashiwa and Hongo) were closely positioned in the dendrogram (Figure 2, closed symbols), indicating that the observed OTU compositions reflect the microbial populations in precipitation rather than those in the atmosphere near the ground surface or equipment- or reagent-mediated contamination at each site. NMDS analysis did not show any clear trend, although samples of close dates tended to be clustered together (Supplementary Figure S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Hierarchical clustering of precipitation samples based on OTU composition. The distance matrix was calculated based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, and clusters were calculated using Ward's method. Open symbols indicate samples that were collected during the same precipitation event with different volumes. Closed symbols indicate samples that were collected on the same day at different sites (Kashiwa and Hongo).

Taxonomic composition of precipitation microbial communities

Among the 12,089 effective sequences, 11,994 (99.2%) were taxonomically assigned at the phylum level. Almost all sequences were assigned to 24 phyla in the domain Bacteria with the exception of 4 (0.03%) and 219 (1.7%) sequences assigned to Archaea and mitochondria, respectively. This strong bias toward bacterial sequences may reflect the actual composition but may also be attributable to amplification bias introduced by primer specificity. The top three and six most abundant bacterial phyla accounted for >80 and >95%, respectively, of the sequence pool of all precipitation samples (Figure 3A). Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum (23–88%) across all precipitation samples with the exception of the 140630, 140926, and 150116K samples (Firmicutes (89–94%), Actinobacteria (50%), and Firmicutes (49%) were the most abundant phyla, respectively). A particularly exceptional microbial community dominated by Firmicutes was observed in the 140630K sample. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria were the other dominant phyla in the total sequence pool. In principle, these results were consistent with those of a previous study in which Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla in precipitation samples captured in Seoul, Korea (Cho and Jang, 2014), whereas comparatively greater numbers of sequences were assigned to Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Cyanobacteria in this study. At the class level, the abundant groups were Gammaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Alphaproteobacteria, followed by Bacilli, Flavobacteriia, Clostridia, Actinobacteria, and Sphingobacteriia (Figure 3B). Notably, the enrichment of these phyla and classes was also reported in previous studies investigating aerosolized (Bowers et al., 2009, 2011a; DeLeon-Rodriguez et al., 2013) and cloud water microbial communities (Kourtev et al., 2011; DeLeon-Rodriguez et al., 2013).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Relative abundances of sequences at the phylum (A) and class (B) levels. Groups demonstrating <5% abundance were summarized as “Others.”

Several OTUs were assigned to genera that potentially contain INA bacteria, i.e., Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Erwinia, Flavobacterium, Luteimonas, Microbacterium, Pseudomonas, Psychrobacter, Sphingomonas, and Stenotrophomonas (Després et al., 2012). We also detected several genera containing known pathogens, including typical human pathogens such as Legionella, Streptococcus, Arcobacter, Rickettsia, and Clostridium, and plant pathogens such as Erwinia, although their abundance was low. We did not detect season-specific microbial groups in the typhoon rain, rainy season, and snow samples with statistical significance, probably partly due to small sample sizes.

Seasonal and meteorological correlations

Taxonomic distribution exhibited seasonal variability (Figure 3). Notably, the abundance of Proteobacteria decreased from summer to winter (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test), and a similar trend has consistently been observed in aerosolized microbial communities (Bowers et al., 2011b). To more closely investigate the factors underlying changes in the precipitation microbial communities, we performed a correlation analysis between meteorological characteristics and microbial composition (Figure 4). The relative abundance of the order Bacteroidales negatively correlated with temperature (Spearman correlation ρ = −0.70, p < 0.01 after the Bonferroni correction). Although other correlations were not statistically significant after multiple testing correction, the amount of precipitation, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure showed tendencies of positive correlations with the abundance of the orders Cellvibrionales (ρ = 0.59), Cellvibrionales (ρ = 0.58), and Pseudomonadales (ρ = 0.57), respectively. Notably, the abundance of the order Legionellales, which contains several known pathogens, showed a tendency of a positive correlation with temperature (ρ = 0.47), where aerosolized water is known to facilitate the dispersion of Legionella (Nguyen et al., 2006) and a warm and wet climate is associated with the incidence of Legionnaires' disease (Fisman et al., 2005; Fisman, 2007). Although cell numbers were not measured except for one sample in this study, we note that seasonal variability in cell numbers would also be important, especially because that of atmospheric samples was reported (Kaushik et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2016). Similarly, analyses with particulate matter density and O3 and NO3 concentrations are also envisioned, because they would substantially affect aerial microbes (Kaushik et al., 2012; DeLeon-Rodriguez et al., 2013; Wei et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Correlation analysis between relative abundances of sequences at the order level and meteorological data. The color scheme represents Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Relationship between ordinary habitats of precipitation microbes and air mass backward trajectories

To estimate the environments from which microbes in precipitation originated, we performed a microbial habitat index analysis using MetaMetaDB (Yang and Iwasaki, 2014), which is a database to estimate the ordinary habitats of microbes based on similarity searches for 16S rRNA gene sequences against amplicon-sequencing and shotgun metagenomic data in public databases. In most samples, animal-associated environments, such as gut microbiota, were estimated to be the most dominant ordinary habitats (52% on average) (Figure 5, Supplementary Figure S4), which is consistent with a previous study in which animal feces were the dominant source of airborne bacteria (Bowers et al., 2011b). Notably, marine-related environments, such as marine and marine sediment, were estimated to be relatively major ordinary habitats for several samples (e.g., 65.1 and 63.1% in the 140810 and 141014K samples, respectively). Soil-related environments, such as soil and rhizosphere, were also estimated to be major ordinary habitats (11.0% on average). For comparison, we also conducted ordinary habitat analyses using amplicon-sequencing data from aerosol (Xia et al., 2015) and cloud water (DeLeon-Rodriguez et al., 2013) samples. The soil-related and animal-associated environments were generally major ordinary habitats as consistent to the present results, whereas marine-related environments were not major possibly because the origins of the microbes or the sampling methods were different from those in our study (Supplementary Figure S5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Estimated ordinary habitats of precipitation microbes. Because the ordinary habitat for an individual 16S rRNA sequence cannot be conclusively determined, the microbial habitability index (MHI) was calculated to estimate the probability of an ordinary habitat (Yang and Iwasaki, 2014). Estimated ordinary habitats demonstrating <5% abundance were summarized as “Others.” The estimated route of the air mass before each precipitation event is indicated in the right column. The terrestrial, oceanic, and hybrid routes are colored in orange, blue, and green, respectively. The estimated air mass backward trajectory maps are provided in Supplementary Figure S3.

The estimated backward trajectories of air masses that led to the precipitation events at the Kashiwa and Hongo sites were classified as terrestrial, oceanic, and hybrid routes. The terrestrial route typically originated from the middle of the Eurasian continent and passed through the East China Sea, the Yellow Sea, and the Sea of Japan; the oceanic route typically originated from the Pacific Ocean and passed through the East China Sea or the Sea of Okhotsk; and the hybrid route comprised both the terrestrial and oceanic areas. Consistent with the typical pattern of the seasonal winds in Asia, the terrestrial and oceanic routes dominated in winter and summer, respectively (Figure 5, Supplementary Figure S3). The estimated ordinary habitats of the precipitation microbes showed agreement with the estimated air mass backward trajectories. For example, Planctomycetes, which contains several aquatic microbes (Fuerst, 1995), was frequently found when the backward trajectories followed oceanic routes (Figures 3A, 5). PERMANOVA analysis showed a significant relationship between the routes and the estimated composition of ordinary microbial habitats (p < 0.05). Notably, the ratios of marine-related environments dominated when the air masses originated from the oceanic route, and animal-related environments dominated when they originated from the terrestrial route. Shannon's diversity indices of microbes became larger when the air masses originated from the terrestrial route (Shannon's diversity indices were 3.74 ± 0.68, 3.05 ± 1.00, and 3.15 ± 1.36 for the terrestrial, oceanic, and hybrid routes, respectively. The index of each sample is shown in Table 1); however, it should be noted that some samples required additional sequences to reach plateaus of rarefaction curves as mentioned already.

Soil, oceanic, and animal-associated microbes are spread in the atmosphere and transported for long distances (Morris et al., 2014; Smets et al., 2016), and precipitation may facilitate this microbial cycle. Sea-living microbes are emitted into the atmosphere via the bursting of bubbles on waves (Fahlgren et al., 2015), whereas soil-living and animal-associated microbes are transported on soil dust (Echigo et al., 2005; Prospero et al., 2005; Maki et al., 2011; Yamaguchi et al., 2014). In high-altitude atmospheric environments, microbes may be under substantial selection pressure due to harsh chemical, physical, and nutrient conditions (Delort et al., 2010; Morris et al., 2013; Smith, 2013). INA microbes play roles in cloud formation (Morris et al., 2013) and may facilitate the return of aerial microbes to diverse environments. The dispersal of pathogenic microbes causes disease epidemics that threaten public health and agricultural plant and animal health (Brown and Hovmøller, 2002; Rodó et al., 2011, 2014; Cao et al., 2014). Continuous long-term monitoring and large-scale analysis of precipitation microbes is thus envisioned to reveal the full impact of atmospheric microbial transport on microbial ecology, microbial evolution, public health, and climate.

Conclusion

Microbes are present nearly everywhere in the Earth, even in precipitation from the sky. Precipitation is supposed to make microbes in the atmosphere finally fall down to the ground surface. In this study, we thoroughly observed microbial communities in precipitation samples that were collected over 1 year in the Grate Tokyo area, Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first amplicon-sequencing study investigating precipitation microbial communities involving sampling over the duration of a year. Most importantly, our results suggest seasonal variations in the microbial communities in precipitation, and their community structures were significantly associated with the estimated air mass trajectories. These results highlight importance of precipitation in long-range microbial immigration via the atmosphere, which may answer how tiny microbes can dynamically travel around the globe.

Author contributions

SH designed and performed the bioinformatics analyses and wrote the manuscript. MM designed the experiments and performed the sample collection, DNA extraction, DNA sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses. KF and AM designed the experiments and performed the sample collection, cell counting, DNA extraction, and DNA sequencing. WI conceived of and designed the study, wrote the manuscript, and supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kazuhiro Kogure, Minoru Ijichi, and Suguru Nishijima for their helpful suggestions.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant Numbers 15J08604, 15H01725, and 16H06154), the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan (221S0002 and 16H06279), and the Canon Foundation.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01506/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure S1

Rarefaction curves for each precipitation sample.

Click here for additional data file. (431.1KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure S2

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plot for OTU compositions. The distance matrix was calculated based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. The stress value of the final configuration was 20.46%.

Click here for additional data file. (258.1KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure S3

The estimated air mass backward trajectories 240 h prior to precipitation events.

Click here for additional data file. (1.1MB, PDF)
Supplementary Figure S4

Estimated ordinary habitats of precipitation microbes for three ecosystem groups. The abundance values in each ecosystem group are summation for habitats described below. Marine-related: “aquatic”, “marine”, “marine sediment”, “fish”, and “hot spring”; Animal-associated: “human”, “human gut”, “human lung”, “human nasal pharyngeal”, “bovine gut”, and “mouse gut”; and Soil-related: “hydrocarbon”, “rhizosphere”, “soil”, and “terrestrial.” The estimated route of the air mass before each precipitation event is indicated in the right column.

Click here for additional data file. (264.7KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure S5

Estimated ordinary habitats of microbes in aerosol and cloud water samples. Estimated ordinary habitats demonstrating <5% abundance were summarized as “Others.”

Click here for additional data file. (280.9KB, TIF)
Supplementary Table S1

Amplicon-sequencing data of aerosol and cloud water samples.

Click here for additional data file. (14.9KB, XLSX)

References

  1. Ahern H. E., Walsh K. A., Hill T. C. J., Moffett B. F. (2007). Fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from Hebridean cloud and rain water produce biosurfactants but do not cause ice nucleation. Biogeosciences 4, 115–124. 10.5194/bg-4-115-2007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amato P., Demeer F., Melaouhi A., Fontanella S., Martin-Biesse A.-S., Sancelme M., et al. (2007). A fate for organic acids, formaldehyde and methanol in cloud water: their biotransformation by micro-organisms. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 4159–4169. 10.5194/acp-7-4159-2007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowers R. M., Clements N., Emerson J. B., Wiedinmyer C., Hannigan M. P., Fierer N. (2013). Seasonal variability in bacterial and fungal diversity of the near-surface atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 12097–12106. 10.1021/es402970s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowers R. M., Lauber C. L., Wiedinmyer C., Hamady M., Hallar A. G., Fall R., et al. (2009). Characterization of airborne microbial communities at a high-elevation site and their potential to act as atmospheric ice nuclei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5121–5130. 10.1128/AEM.00447-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowers R. M., McLetchie S., Knight R., Fierer N. (2011a). Spatial variability in airborne bacterial communities across land-use types and their relationship to the bacterial communities of potential source environments. ISME J. 5, 601–612. 10.1038/ismej.2010.167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowers R. M., Sullivan A. P., Costello E. K., Collett J. L., Knight R., Fierer N. (2011b). Sources of bacteria in outdoor air across cities in the midwestern United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 6350–6356. 10.1128/AEM.05498-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown J. K. M., Hovmøller M. S. (2002). Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science 297, 537–541. 10.1126/science.1072678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burrows S. M., Elbert W., Lawrence M. G., Pöschl U. (2009). Bacteria in the global atmosphere—Part 1: review and synthesis of literature data for different ecosystems. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 9263–9280. 10.5194/acp-9-9263-2009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Camacho C., Coulouris G., Avagyan V., Ma N., Papadopoulos J., Bealer K., et al. (2009). BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao C., Jiang W., Wang B., Fang J., Lang J., Tian G., et al. (2014). Inhalable microorganisms in Beijing's PM2.5 and PM10 pollutants during a severe smog event. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 1499–1507. 10.1021/es4048472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cho B. C., Jang G., II. (2014). Active and diverse rainwater bacteria collected at an inland site in spring and summer 2011. Atmos. Environ. 94, 409–416. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.048 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Christner B. C., Morris C. E., Foreman C. M., Cai R., Sands D. C. (2008). Ubiquity of biological ice nucleators in snowfall. Science 319, 1214–1214. 10.1126/science.1149757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Claesson M. J., Wang Q., O'Sullivan O., Greene-Diniz R., Cole J. R., Ross R. P., et al. (2010). Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:e200. 10.1093/nar/gkq873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cox M. P., Peterson D. A., Biggs P. J. (2010). SolexaQA: at-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 11:485. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DeLeon-Rodriguez N., Lathem T. L., Rodriguez R. L. M., Barazesh J. M., Anderson B. E., Beyersdorf A. J., et al. (2013). Microbiome of the upper troposphere: species composition and prevalence, effects of tropical storms, and atmospheric implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 2575–2580. 10.1073/pnas.1212089110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Delort A.-M., Vaïtilingom M., Amato P., Sancelme M., Parazols M., Mailhot G., et al. (2010). A short overview of the microbial population in clouds: potential roles in atmospheric chemistry and nucleation processes. Atmos. Res. 98, 249–260. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.07.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Després V. R., Alex Huffman J., Burrows S. M., Hoose C., Safatov A. S., Buryak G., et al. (2012). Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review. Tellus Ser. B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 64:15598 10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dong L., Qi J., Shao C., Zhong X., Gao D., Cao W., et al. (2016). Concentration and size distribution of total airborne microbes in hazy and foggy weather. Sci. Total Environ. 541, 1011–1018. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Echigo A., Hino M., Fukushima T., Mizuki T., Kamekura M., Usami R. (2005). Endospores of halophilic bacteria of the family Bacillaceae isolated from non-saline Japanese soil may be transported by Kosa event (Asian dust storm). Saline Syst. 1, 1–13. 10.1186/1746-1448-1-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edgar R. C., Haas B. J., Clemente J. C., Quince C., Knight R. (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fahlgren C., Gómez-Consarnau L., Zábori J., Lindh M. V., Krejci R., Mårtensson E. M., et al. (2015). Seawater mesocosm experiments in the Arctic uncover differential transfer of marine bacteria to aerosols. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 7, 460–470. 10.1111/1758-2229.12273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fisman D. N. (2007). Seasonality of infectious diseases. Annu. Rev. Public Health 28, 127–143. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fisman D. N., Lim S., Wellenius G. A., Johnson C., Britz P., Gaskins M., et al. (2005). It's not the heat, It's the humidity: wet weather increases legionellosis risk in the Greater Philadelphia Metropolitan Area. J. Infect. Dis. 192, 2066–2073. 10.1086/498248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fitt B. D. L., McCartney H. A., Walklate P. J. (1989). The role of rain in dispersal of pathogen inoculum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27, 241–270. 10.1146/annurev.py.27.090189.001325 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fröhlich-Nowoisky J., Kampf C. J., Weber B., Huffman J. A., Pöhlker C., Andreae M. O., et al. (2016). Bioaerosols in the earth system: climate, health, and ecosystem interactions. Atmos. Res. 182, 346–376. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fu L., Niu B., Zhu Z., Wu S., Li W. (2012). CD-HIT: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fuerst J. A. (1995). The Palnctomycetes: emerging models for microbial ecology evolution and cell biology. Microbiology 141, 1493–1506. 10.1099/13500872-141-7-1493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamilton W. D., Lenton T. M. (1998). Spora and Gaia: how microbes fly with their clouds. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1–16. 10.1080/08927014.1998.9522867 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hara K., Maki T., Kobayashi F., Kakikawa M., Wada M., Matsuki A. (2016). Variations of ice nuclei concentration induced by rain and snowfall within a local forested site in Japan. Atmos. Environ. 127, 1–5. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hervàs A., Camarero L., Reche I., Casamayor E. O. (2009). Viability and potential for immigration of airborne bacteria from Africa that reach high mountain lakes in Europe. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 1612–1623. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01926.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hill K. A., Shepson P. B., Galbavy E. S., Anastasio C., Kourtev P. S., Konopka A., et al. (2007). Processing of atmospheric nitrogen by clouds above a forest environment. J. Geophys. Res. 112:D11301 10.1029/2006JD008002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoose C., Möhler O. (2012). Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 9817–9854. 10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Joly M., Attard E., Sancelme M., Deguillaume L., Guilbaud C., Morris C. E., et al. (2013). Ice nucleation activity of bacteria isolated from cloud water. Atmos. Environ. 70, 392–400. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kaushik R., Balasubramanian R., de la Cruz A. A. (2012). Influence of air quality on the composition of microbial pathogens in fresh rainwater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2813–2818. 10.1128/AEM.07695-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kaushik R., Balasubramanian R., Dunstan H. (2014). Microbial quality and phylogenetic diversity of fresh rainwater and tropical freshwater reservoir. PLoS ONE 9:e100737. 10.1371/journal.pone.0100737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kellogg C. A., Griffin D. W. (2006). Aerobiology and the global transport of desert dust. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 638–644. 10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kobayashi F., Maki T., Kakikawa M., Yamada M., Puspitasari F., Iwasaka Y. (2015). Bioprocess of Kosa bioaerosols: effect of ultraviolet radiation on airborne bacteria within Kosa (Asian dust). J. Biosci. Bioeng. 119, 570–579. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Konstantinidis K. T. (2014). Do airborne microbes matter for atmospheric chemistry and cloud formation? Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1482–1484. 10.1111/1462-2920.12396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kourtev P. S., Hill K. A., Shepson P. B., Konopka A. (2011). Atmospheric cloud water contains a diverse bacterial community. Atmos. Environ. 45, 5399–5405. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Maki T., Aoki K., Kobayashi F., Kakikawa M., Tobo Y., Matsuki A., et al. (2011). Characterization of halotolerant and oligotrophic bacterial communities in Asian desert dust (KOSA) bioaerosol accumulated in layers of snow on Mount Tateyama, Central Japan. Aerobiologia 27, 277–290. 10.1007/s10453-011-9196-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Morris C. E., Conen F., Huffman J. A., Phillips V., Pöschl U., Sands D. C. (2014). Bioprecipitation: a feedback cycle linking Earth history, ecosystem dynamics and land use through biological ice nucleators in the atmosphere. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 341–351. 10.1111/gcb.12447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morris C. E., Monteil C. L., Berge O. (2013). The life history of Pseudomonas syringae: linking agriculture to earth system processes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 51, 85–104. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mortazavi R., Hayes C. T., Ariya P. A. (2008). Ice nucleation activity of bacteria isolated from snow compared with organic and inorganic substrates. Environ. Chem. 5:373 10.1071/EN08055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nguyen T. M. N., Ilef D., Jarraud S., Rouil L., Campese C., Che D., et al. (2006). A community-wide outbreak of legionnaires disease linked to industrial cooling towers-how far can contaminated aerosols spread? J. Infect. Dis. 193, 102–111. 10.1086/498575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Peter H., Hörtnagl P., Reche I., Sommaruga R. (2014). Bacterial diversity and composition during rain events with and without Saharan dust influence reaching a high mountain lake in the Alps. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6, 618–624. 10.1111/1758-2229.12175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Prospero J. M., Blades E., Mathison G., Naidu R. (2005). Interhemispheric transport of viable fungi and bacteria from Africa to the Caribbean with soil dust. Aerobiologia 21, 1–19. 10.1007/s10453-004-5872-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., Gerken J., Schweer T., Yarza P., et al. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rodó X., Ballester J., Cayan D., Melish M. E., Nakamura Y., Uehara R., et al. (2011). Association of Kawasaki disease with tropospheric wind patterns. Sci. Rep. 1:152. 10.1038/srep00152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodó X., Curcoll R., Robinson M., Ballester J., Burns J. C., Cayan D. R., et al. (2014). Tropospheric winds from northeastern China carry the etiologic agent of Kawasaki disease from its source to Japan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 7952–7957. 10.1073/pnas.1400380111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Smets W., Moretti S., Denys S., Lebeer S. (2016). Airborne bacteria in the atmosphere: presence, purpose, and potential. Atmos. Environ. 139, 214–221. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith D. J. (2013). Microbes in the upper atmosphere and unique opportunities for astrobiology research. Astrobiology 13, 981–990. 10.1089/ast.2013.1074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith D. J., Timonen H. J., Jaffe D. A., Griffin D. W., Birmele M. N., Perry K. D., et al. (2013). Intercontinental dispersal of bacteria and archaea by transpacific winds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 1134–1139. 10.1128/AEM.03029-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stein A. F., Draxler R. R., Rolph G. D., Stunder B. J. B., Cohen M. D., Ngan F. (2015). NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 2059–2077. 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stopelli E., Conen F., Morris C. E., Herrmann E., Bukowiecki N., Alewell C. (2015). Ice nucleation active particles are efficiently removed by precipitating clouds. Sci. Rep. 5:16433. 10.1038/srep16433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Šantl-Temkiv T., Finster K., Dittmar T., Hansen B. M., Thyrhaug R., Nielsen N. W., et al. (2013). Hailstones: a window into the microbial and chemical inventory of a storm cloud. PLoS ONE 8:e53550. 10.1371/journal.pone.0053550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vaïtilingom M., Attard E., Gaiani N., Sancelme M., Deguillaume L., Flossmann A. I., et al. (2012). Long-term features of cloud microbiology at the puy de Dôme (France). Atmos. Environ. 56, 88–100. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.03.072 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vaïtilingom M., Deguillaume L., Vinatier V., Sancelme M., Amato P., Chaumerliac N., et al. (2013). Potential impact of microbial activity on the oxidant capacity and organic carbon budget in clouds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 559–564. 10.1073/pnas.1205743110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang Y., Qian P.-Y. (2009). Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS ONE 4:e7401. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wei M., Xu C., Chen J., Zhu C., Li J., Lv G. (2016). Characteristics of bacterial community in fog water at Mt. Tai: similarity and disparity under polluted and non-polluted fog episodes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2016, 1–30. 10.5194/acp-2016-776 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Woo A. C., Brar M. S., Chan Y., Lau M. C. Y., Leung F. C. C., Scott J. A., et al. (2013). Temporal variation in airborne microbial populations and microbially-derived allergens in a tropical urban landscape. Atmos. Environ. 74, 291–300. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Xia X., Wang J., Ji J., Zhang J., Chen L., Zhang R. (2015). Bacterial communities in marine aerosols revealed by 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. J. Atmos. Sci. 72, 2997–3008. 10.1175/JAS-D-15-0008.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Xu C., Wei M., Chen J., Sui X., Zhu C., Li J., et al. (2017). Investigation of diverse bacteria in cloud water at Mt. Tai, China. Sci. Total Environ. 580, 258–265. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yamaguchi N., Ichijo T., Baba T., Nasu M. (2014). Long-range transportation of bacterial cells by Asian dust. Genes Environ. 36, 145–151. 10.3123/jemsge.2014.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang C.-C., Iwasaki W. (2014). MetaMetaDB: A database and analytic system for investigating microbial habitability. PLoS ONE 9:e87126. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zweifel U. L., Hagström Å., Holmfeldt K., Thyrhaug R., Geels C., Frohn L. M., et al. (2012). High bacterial 16S rRNA gene diversity above the atmospheric boundary layer. Aerobiologia 28, 481–498. 10.1007/s10453-012-9250-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1

Rarefaction curves for each precipitation sample.

Click here for additional data file. (431.1KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure S2

Nonmetric multidimensional scaling plot for OTU compositions. The distance matrix was calculated based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. The stress value of the final configuration was 20.46%.

Click here for additional data file. (258.1KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure S3

The estimated air mass backward trajectories 240 h prior to precipitation events.

Click here for additional data file. (1.1MB, PDF)
Supplementary Figure S4

Estimated ordinary habitats of precipitation microbes for three ecosystem groups. The abundance values in each ecosystem group are summation for habitats described below. Marine-related: “aquatic”, “marine”, “marine sediment”, “fish”, and “hot spring”; Animal-associated: “human”, “human gut”, “human lung”, “human nasal pharyngeal”, “bovine gut”, and “mouse gut”; and Soil-related: “hydrocarbon”, “rhizosphere”, “soil”, and “terrestrial.” The estimated route of the air mass before each precipitation event is indicated in the right column.

Click here for additional data file. (264.7KB, TIF)
Supplementary Figure S5

Estimated ordinary habitats of microbes in aerosol and cloud water samples. Estimated ordinary habitats demonstrating <5% abundance were summarized as “Others.”

Click here for additional data file. (280.9KB, TIF)
Supplementary Table S1

Amplicon-sequencing data of aerosol and cloud water samples.

Click here for additional data file. (14.9KB, XLSX)

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES