Skip to main content
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2017 Aug 11;8:568. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00568

Corrigendum: Coupling Developmental Physiology, Photoperiod, and Temperature to Model Phenology and Dynamics of an Invasive Heteropteran, Halyomorpha halys

Anne L Nielsen 1,*, Shi Chen 2, Shelby J Fleischer 3
PMCID: PMC5554514  PMID: 28808440

In this manuscript, we present model results from eight locations over 10 years based on temperatures at weather stations and photoperiod. We inadvertently made a poor choice for a weather station to represent Wenatchee WA. To avoid heat island effects, we chose the Grouse Camp weather station to represent Wenatchee. However, although Grouse Camp is only 21 km from Wenatchee, it is in a mountainous area (1,642 m elevation) and poorly represents the climate in the apple growing region of Wenatchee, WA (190 m elevation). Thus, the results do not reflect potential population dynamics of H. halys in Wenatchee. In re-evaluation of the model, the data show that populations at Wenatchee, WA, are predicted to behave similarly to those at Salem, OR, with an average albeit marginal positive population growth. Conclusions that were driven heavily by photoperiod, such as the range in days for initiation of oviposition by overwintered adults, were less affected (from 16 down to 13 days). The strong differences were due to markedly higher degree day accumulations at Wenatchee versus Grouse Camp.

The following six files use the same order of tables and figures from the original manuscript and use the Weather Station data for Wenatchee, WA (network ID: GHCND:USC00459074).

  • Table 2. Model outputs defining key population parameters for the years 2005–2014.

  • Figure 7. Model predictions of adult population size for Wenatchee, WA. P represented parental overwintered adults, which was initialized as 1000 for each year and for each simulation run.

  • Figure 8. Predicted population sizes (+/− range from all simulations and years) across all geographic locations for (A) maximum adult population size, and (B) final population size, and (C) yearly degree-day accumulation. The error bars represent the standard errors from 100 simulations for the metrics.

  • Figure S3. Predicted total population size by life stage for Wenatchee, WA from 2005 through 2014. Populations were initialized with 1000 adults for each year and simulation run.

  • Figure S5. Degree-day accumulation for Halyomorpha halys development in Wenatchee, WA from 2005 through 2014.

  • Figure S7. Predicted total population size by generation for Wenatchee, WA.

Table 2.

Model outputs defining key population parameters for the years 2005-2014.

Location Coordinates Crop Non-diapause range P Oviposition F1 Eclosion F2 Eclosion Final adult population
Range Median Range Median Range Median F1 F2
Geneva NY 42.88°N 76.99°W Apple Apr 18–Aug 26 May 30–Jun 17 Jun 7 Jun 21–Jul 18 Jun 30 Jul 19–Aug 9 Jul 28 243–447 81–1,847
Bridgeton NJ 39.43°N 75.23°W Peach/Vegetable Apr 22–Aug 22 Jun 3–Jun 6 Jun 4 Jun 9–Jul 2 Jun 23 Jul 6–Jul 31 Jul 24 140–278 531–2,027
Asheville NC 35.58°N 85.56°W Tree fruit/Vegetable Apr 28–Aug 17 May 28–May 29 May 29 Jun 3–Jun 11 Jun 6 Jun 25–Jul 4 Jul 2 89–253 803–2,287
Homestead FL 25.47°N 80.47°W Tomato/Strawberry May 24–July 22 Jun 5–Jun 6 Jun 6 Jun 17–Jun 18 Jun 18 Jul 8–Jul 10 Jul 9 44–137 1318–2,781
Wenatchee WA 47.42°N 120.33°W Apple/Pear Apr 14–Aug 31 Jun 2–Jun 15 Jun 8 Jun 17–Jun 29 Jun 22 Aug 1–Aug 18 Aug 6 106–559 46–1,557
Salem OR 44.93°N 123.03°W Tree fruit/Wine grape Apr 17–Aug 28 Jun 8–Jun 9 Jun 9 Jun 17–Jul 2 Jun 26 Jul 24–Jul 31 Jul 27 269–716 33–1,035
Davis CA 38.55°N 121.74°W Tomato Apr 24–Aug 20 Jun 3–Jun 4 Jun 4 Jun 14–Jun 19 Jun 16 Jul 6–Jul 15 Jul 11 75–255 733–1,893
Riverside CA 33.95°N 117.40°W Citrus May 1–Aug 13 Jun 10–Jun 11 Jun 11 Jun 20–Jun 24 Jun 23 Jul 8–Jul 16 Jul 13 21–95 349–962

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Model predictions of adult population size for Wenatchee, WA. P represented parental overwintered adults, which was initialized as 1,000 for each year and for each simulation run.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Predicted population sizes (+/− range from all simulations and years) across all geographic locations for (A) maximum adult population size, and (B) final population size, and (C) yearly degree-day accumulation. The error bars represent the standard errors from 100 simulations for the metrics.

We thank V. Jones for bringing this error to our attention, and the Frontiers journal for allowing us to add this Corrigendum.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon the work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number SCRI 2011-51181-30937.

References

  1. Weather Station: Wenatchee, WA: (Network ID: GHCND:USC00459074). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES