Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jun 20;56(30):8805–8808. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704226

Direct Zinc(II)-Catalyzed Enantioconvergent Additions of Terminal Alkynes to α-Keto Esters

Blane P Zavesky 1, Jeffrey S Johnson 1,
PMCID: PMC5554871  NIHMSID: NIHMS887274  PMID: 28557339

Abstract

The addition of terminal alkynes to racemic β-stereogenic α-keto esters was achieved in high levels of stereoselectivity, affording versatile tertiary propargylic alcohols containing two stereocenters. This environmentally benign enantioconvergent reaction proceeds with perfect atom economy, requires no solvent, and is catalyzed by a non-toxic zinc salt. The alkyne moiety can be leveraged in downstream transformations including hydrogenation to the corresponding saturated tertiary alcohol, which represents the product of a formal enantioconvergent aliphatic nucleophile addition.

Keywords: alkynes, asymmetric, catalysis, green, chemistry, synthetic, methods, zinc

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms887274u1.jpg

A perfect transformation: The addition of terminal alkynes to racemic β-stereogenic α-keto esters was achieved in high levels of stereoselectivity, affording versatile tertiary propargylic alcohols containing two stereocenters. This environmentally benign enantioconvergent reaction proceeds with high atom economy, requires no solvent, and is catalyzed by a non-toxic zinc salt.


Since the foundational report from Noyori and co-workers describing the dynamic kinetic hydrogenation of β-keto esters,[1] enantioconvergent reactions that proceed by addition to racemic, configurationally labile electrophiles have been recognized for their ability to furnish stereochemically complex alcohol building blocks. Because of their high acidity, which facilitates substrate enantiomerization, β-dicarbonyl derivatives have remained the factotum substrate in enantioconvergent alcohol syntheses and the majority of these reactions proceed via reduction to furnish secondary alcohols.[2] In contrast, examples of enantioconvergent reactions employing less activated substrates are underexplored. Similarly, relatively few enantioconvergent additions proceed via carbon–carbon bond formation to furnish tertiary alcohol products.[3] We recently reported an enantioconvergent addition employing arylboronic acids and α-keto ester electrophiles catalyzed by a chiral(diene) rhodium(I) complex which furnishes complex tertiary glycolate derivatives (Scheme 1A).[4] The integration of other non-stabilized nucleophilic partners under this reaction manifold carries with it the opportunity to generate novel, stereochemically complex glycolate architectures. The purpose of this communication is to convey experimental results regarding the enantioconvergent addition of alkynes to configurationally labile α-keto esters, a reaction that furnishes tertiary alkynyl glycolates.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Prior art relevant to the title reaction.

As a result of their versatility,[5] propargyl alcohols are routinely employed in total synthesis.[6] The addition of metal acetylides to carbonyls is a venerable method for the synthesis of propargyl alcohols.[7] Following Mukaiyama’s pioneering report describing the asymmetric addition of lithium acetylides to aldehydes,[8] many synthetically useful asymmetric acetylide additions have been disclosed. The Zn(OTf)2/N-methylephedrine catalyzed variant reported by Carreira and co-workers is a preeminent example;[9] the use of Zn(OTf)2 as a catalyst avoids the use of pyrophoric dialkyl zinc promoters and allows the reaction to be rendered catalytic in zinc.[10] While this discovery has led to a thorough investigation of compatible aldehyde substrates, much less attention has been paid to ketone electrophiles.[7a,c,d] A notable exception comes from the Jiang group, who disclosed the alkynylation of α-keto esters (Scheme 1 B).[11] Despite the reaction’s reported intolerance of enolizable substrates, we were intrigued by the potential to construct complex tertiary propargylic alcohols via enantioconvergent acetylide additions (Scheme 1C).

Our investigation began with the coupling of α-keto ester 1a and phenyl acetylene (Table 1). Initially, we chose to carry out the reaction using stoichiometric Zn(OTf)2 and ligand in order to first to probe the diastereo- and enantioselectivity of the reaction. Following Carreira’s conditions,[9] glycolate product 3a was formed in 2.5:1 dr and 87:13 er (entry 1). When the ligand was changed to the amino alcohol developed by the Jiang group, which is accessible in 2 steps from commercially available (1R,2R)-2-amino-1-(4-nitrophenyl)-propane-1,3-diol,[11, 12] an increase in both diastereo- and enantioselectivity was observed (entry 2). Encouraged by this result, we next turned to rendering the process catalytic. Increasing the temperature while reducing catalyst loading to 20 mol% resulted in low conversion to product 3a (entry 3). Zinc acetylide additions are ligand accelerated,[13] thus we probed the hypothesis that reactivity could be improved by employing stoichiometric Zn(OTf)2 and catalytic ligand with-out negatively impacting enantioselectivity (entry 4). Although conversion was increased, a significant drop in enantioselectivity led us to abandon this strategy. When the reaction was run neat at 70°C,[10] excellent conversion and enantioselectivity were obtained (entry 5). Finally, lowering the temperature of the reaction to 40°C improved the diastereoselectivity of the reaction, affording product 3a in quantitative conversion, 8.7:1 dr, and 99:1 er (entry 6).

Table 1.

Optimization of alkynylation reaction conditions.[a]

graphic file with name nihms887274u2.jpg

Entry mol% Zn L T [°C] Conv [%] dr[b] er[c]
1 110 D[d] RT 38 2.5:1 87:13
2 110 C[d] RT 51 3.6:1 98:2
3 20 C 70 <5
4 110 C 70 70 3.7:1 64:36
5[e] 20 C 70 94 3.8:1 96:4
6[e] 20 C 40 99 8.7:1 99:1
graphic file with name nihms887274u3.jpg
[a]

Unless otherwise noted, reactions conditions are as follows: 1.0 equiv of 1a, 3.0 equiv of 2a, variable amounts of Zn(OTf)2, 50 mol% NEt3, 22 mol% ligand, PhMe ([1a]0=0.2 m), 24 h.

[b]

Determined by 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.

[c]

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis. Represents the enantiomeric ratio of the major diastereomer.

[d]

120 mol% ligand employed.

[e]

Reactions were conducted using no solvent.

Under our optimized conditions, a variety of terminal alkynes were added to α-keto ester 1a (Table 2). Electron-rich aryl alkyne 2b was used to deliver alcohol 3b in good diastereo- and enantiocontrol. 4-Fluorophenyl acetylene (2c) proved to be an excellent coupling partner as well. Ene-yne product 3d was obtained in 6.3:1 dr and 98.5:1.5 er. Alkyl substituted alkynes also proved to be viable substrates. In general, forming these products required slightly higher reaction temperatures. Alkyl alkynes substituted with heteroatoms gave satisfactory results. The use of a protected primary alcohol, as represented by product 3f, was well tolerated. Acetal 3g was assembled with only modest diastereoselectivity (4.6:1 dr) but almost perfect enantioselectivity (99.5:0.5 er). Amine 2h restored higher levels of diastereoselectivity. When alkynes with α-tertiary centers (2i, 2j) were added to 1a, the highest levels of diastereoselectivity were obtained. A free alcohol was tolerated in the formation of 3i. Finally, (+)-citronellal-derived alkyne 2k was employed, which gave product 3k in excellent selectivity and yield.

Table 2.

Scope of alkynylation reaction.[a]

graphic file with name nihms887274f4.jpg
[a]

Reaction conditions: 1.0 equiv 1, 3.0 equiv 2, 20 mol% Zn (OTf)2, 22 mol% C, 50 mol% NEt3, 24 h. All diastereomeric pairs were separated via column chromatography on silica gel. The reported enantiomeric ratio is of the major diastereomer.

[b]

Reaction conducted at 50°C.

[c]

Reaction conducted at 60°C.

[d]

Reaction time of 48 h.

[e]

Reaction conducted at 70°C.

Next, the generality of the α-keto ester partner was probed (Table 2). α-Keto ester 1l, which contains an electron-rich substituent on the aryl ring, provided glycolate product 3l with exquisite selectivity. The formation of product 3m in 78% yield, 8.2:1 dr, and 96.5:3.5 er indicates that this reaction is viable for substrates containing electronegative substituents and arenes bearing ortho substitution. When β-allyl α-keto esters were empoyed (1n and 1o), an increase in temperature to 50°C was required, resulting in reduced levels of diastereoselectivity. Glycolate product 3o, containing a meta-substituted aryl ring, was formed with the lowest enantioselectivity (93.5:6.5 er), which indicates that substitution about the arene can have a noticeable effect on enantioselectivity. When α-keto esters containing strongly electron-withdrawing groups on the arene or substitution at the γ-position, poor conversions were observed, even at elevated temperatures.

An X-ray diffraction study revealed the stereochemistry of 3b to be (2S,3R).[14] The relative configuration indicates that the favored transition state follows the Felkin–Anh model (Figure 1)[15] and the absolute stereochemistry agrees with the results of Carreira[10] and Jiang.[11, 12]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Determination of relative and absolute stereochemistries by X-ray crystallography.

To evaluate the synthetic utility of the propargylic alcohol products, a number of secondary transformations were carried out (Scheme 2). Tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) mediated removal of the trimethylsilyl group from compound 3j afforded the terminal alkyne 4 in 59% yield. Compound 3a underwent nickel boride-catalyzed partial hydrogenation to form syn-alkene 5 in high yield. Boron substituted alkene 6 was formed through the method of Tsuji and co-workers.[16] Finally, a palladium on carbon catalyzed hydrogenation furnished product 7 in excellent yield. This hydrogenation shows that for these products, the alkyne functionality can act as an alkane surrogate,[11] an important feature due to a lack of alternative reliable methods for accomplishing this net transformation stereoselectively.[17] Furthermore, the enantioconvergent alkynylation reaction of 1a and phenylacetylene was conducted on a gram scale. Since excess alkyne served only the role of solubilizing the reaction mixture, the amount of phenylacetylene was decreased to 1.5 molar equivalents. An equal volume amount of toluene was added in place of excess alkyne to dissolve the reagents.[18] This modification produced no significant decrease in yield or stereoselectivity.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Chemical transfomrations of propargyl alcohol products and gram-scale reaction. Conditions: a) TBAF (1 m solution in H2O, 1.2 equiv), THF, 0°C, 15 minutes; b) Ni(OAc)2 (30 mol%), NaBH4 (60 mol%), ethylenediamine (1 equiv), H2 (1 atm), EtOH, RT, 8 h; c) E (2 mol%), NaOtBu (12 mol%), HBpin (1.5 equiv), toluene, 60°C, 16 h; d) Pd/C (10 wt.%), H2 (1 atm).

In conclusion, we have developed a stereoconvergent alkynylation reaction of β-stereogenic α-keto esters. This coupling of α-keto esters and alkynes constitutes a rare example of the addition of a nonstabilized carbon nucleophile to a C=O π-electrophile proceeding in an enantioconvergent fashion. The reaction proceeds with high atom economy and is conducted neat. The substituted glycolate products can be converted into useful alkene and alkane products. Studies aimed at the use of this reaction in the arena of total synthesis are ongoing.

Supplementary Material

supporting information

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported by Award R35 GM118055 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. We thank Dr. Peter White for assistance during X-ray crystallography experiments.

Footnotes

Supporting information and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201704226.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Noyori R, Ikeda T, Ohkuma T, Widhalm M, Kitamura M, Takaya H, Akutagawa S, Sayo N, Saito T, Taketomi T, Kumobayashi H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:9134. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.a) Cartigny D, Püntener K, Ayad T, Scalone M, Ratovelomanana-Vidal V. Org. Lett. 2010;12:3788. doi: 10.1021/ol101451s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Huerta FF, Minidis ABE, Bäckvall J-E. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001;30:321. [Google Scholar]; c) Li X, Tao X, Ma X, Li W, Zhao M, Xie X, Ayad T, Ratovelomanana-Vidal V, Zhang Z. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:7152. [Google Scholar]; d) Liu Z, Schultz CS, Sherwood CA, Krska S, Dormer PG, Desmond R, Lee C, Sherer EC, Shpungin J, Cuff J, Xu F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:1685. [Google Scholar]; e) Noyori R, Tokunaga M, Kitamura M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995;68:36. [Google Scholar]; f) Prévost S, Gauthier S, Caño de Andrade MC, Mordant C, Touati AR, Lesot P, Savignac P, Ayad T, Phansavath P, Ratovelomanana-Vidal V, Genêt J-P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2010;21:1436. [Google Scholar]; g) Ros A, Magriz A, Dietrich H, Lassaletta JM, Fernández R. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:7532. [Google Scholar]; h) Ward RS. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1995;6:1475. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Wu Z, Li F, Wang J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:1629. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410030. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yang J, Wang T, Ding Z, Shen Z, Zhang Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009;7:2208. doi: 10.1039/b822127h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Ward DE, Jheengut V, Akinnusi OT. Org. Lett. 2005;7:1181. doi: 10.1021/ol050195l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Goodman CG, Walker MM, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:122. doi: 10.1021/ja511701j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Corbett MT, Johnson JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:255. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306873. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Goodman CG, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:14698. doi: 10.1021/ja508521a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Cohen DT, Eichman CC, Phillips EM, Zarefsky ER, Scheidt KA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:7309. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203382. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 7421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Calter MA, Phillips RM, Flaschenriem C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:14566. doi: 10.1021/ja055752d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Calter MA, Li N. Org. Lett. 2011;13:3686. doi: 10.1021/ol201332u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Bergeron-Brlek M, Teoh T, Britton R. Org. Lett. 2013;15:3554. doi: 10.1021/ol401370b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bartlett SL, Keiter KM, Johnson JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:3911. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stang PJ, Diederich F, editors. Modern Acetylene Chemistry. VCH, Weinheim; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Roethle PA, Trauner D. Org. Lett. 2006;8:345. doi: 10.1021/ol052922i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Trost BM, Muller TJJ, Martinez J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:1888. [Google Scholar]; c) Zhu G, Lu X. J. Org. Chem. 1995;60:1087. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Cozzi PG, Hilgraf R, Zimmermann N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004:4095. [Google Scholar]; b) Lu G, Li Y-M, Li X-S, Chan ASC. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005;249:1736. [Google Scholar]; c) Pu L. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:9873. [Google Scholar]; d) Pu L, Yu H-B. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:757. doi: 10.1021/cr000411y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Soai K, Niwa S. Chem. Rev. 1992;92:833. [Google Scholar]; f) Trost BM, Weiss AH. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009;351:963. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200800776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mukaiyama T, Suzuki K, Soai K, Sato T. Chem. Lett. 1979;8:447. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Frantz DE, Fässler R, Tomooka CS, Carreira EM. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000;33:373. doi: 10.1021/ar990078o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Frantz DE, Fässler R, Carreira EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:11245. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.a) El-Sayed E, Anand NK, Carreira EM. Org. Lett. 2001;3:3017. doi: 10.1021/ol016431j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sasaki H, Boyall D, Carreira EM. Helv. Chim. Acta. 2001;84:964. [Google Scholar]; c) Sans Diez R, Adger B, Carreira EM. Tetrahedron. 2002;58:8341. [Google Scholar]; d) Boyall D, López F, Sasaki H, Frantz D, Carreira EM. Org. Lett. 2000;2:4233. doi: 10.1021/ol006791r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Frantz DE, Fässler R, Carreira EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:1806. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang B, Chen Z, Tang X. Org. Lett. 2002;4:3451. doi: 10.1021/ol026544i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang B, Chen Z, Xiong W. Chem. Commun. 2002:1524. doi: 10.1039/b203984b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marx B, Henry-Basch E, Freon P. C. R. Seances Acad. Sci. Ser. C. 1967;264:1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.CCDC 1540828 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. The structure in Figure 1 was generated with CYLview: Legault CY. CYLview, version1.0b. Université de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke, QC: 2009. http://www.cylview.org.
  • 15.Mengel A, Reiser O. Chem. Rev. 1999;99:1191. doi: 10.1021/cr980379w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Semba K, Fujihara T, Terao J, Tsuji Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:4179. doi: 10.1002/chem.201103612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Riant O, Hannedouche J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007;5:873. doi: 10.1039/b617746h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Walsh PJ, Li H, Anaya de Parrodi C. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:2503. doi: 10.1021/cr0509556. The authors thank one of our reviewers for suggesting this experiment. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supporting information

RESOURCES