Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Neuroanat. 2017 Feb 14;83-84:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2017.02.001

“A Role for the Serotonin Reuptake “Transporter in the Brain and Intestinal Features of Autism Spectrum Disorders and Developmental Antidepressant Exposure”

Kara Gross Margolis 1
PMCID: PMC5555828  NIHMSID: NIHMS855080  PMID: 28213183

Abstract

Many disease conditions considered CNS-predominant harbor significant intestinal comorbidities. Serotonin (5-HT) and the serotonin reuptake transporter (SERT) have increasingly been shown to play important roles in both brain and intestinal development and long-term function. 5-HT and SERT may thus modulate critical functions in the development and perpetuation of brain-gut axis disease. We discuss the potential roles of 5-HT and SERT in the brain and intestinal manifestations of autism spectrum disorders and developmental antidepressant exposure. The potential therapeutic value of 5-HT4 modulation in the subsequent treatment of these conditions is also addressed.

Keywords: serotonin, serotonin reuptake transporter, autism spectrum disorders, antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, brain-gut axis, 5-HT4 receptor


Researchers and clinicians have increasingly recognized that medical conditions that affect the brain may also impact the intestine. This recognition has led to a surge in research focusing on the links between gastrointestinal (GI) pathology and psychiatric conditions such as anxiety and depression1-3. The bidirectional relationship that exists between the brain and the gut, termed the “brain-gut axis”, seems to play a critical role in these conditions and recent studies in this field have largely focused on the role of the intestinal microbiome2,4,5. Although the evidence for the existence of the gut-brain-microbiota axis is strong, many of these studies provide associations rather than a causal nexus4. Another factor critical to further understanding brain-gut diseases should therefore include the determination of specific shared modulators of brain and gut development. Exploration of the role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and the 5-HT reuptake transporter (SERT) in brain-gut disease is in its infancy but the information available thus far is intriguing and supports important roles for 5-HT and SERT in the development and long-term function of both organ systems6-10. Prior studies support the idea that 5-HT and SERT play key roles in the brain manifestations of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)11,12 or those exposed to the antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), during neurodevelopment13,14. Recent research, however, endorses the notion that SERT regulation of 5-HT may also be critical in the intestinal manifestations of both of these conditions6

5-HT and SERT are located in both the brain and the intestine. The vast majority of 5-HT research has been in the brain where it has been demonstrated to be a key modulator of both central nervous system (CNS) development and behavior15. 95% of the body& apos;s 5-HT, however, is actually found in the intestine where it plays critical roles in enteric nervous system (ENS) development and the GI functions that the ENS modulates, including enteric neurogenesis and GI motility6,15-18. Intestinal SERT is present on both enteric neurons and intestinal epithelial cells15. As in the brain, SERT is the primary intracellular transporter of intestinal 5-HT, and this transport leads to the inactivation of 5-HT by monoamine oxidase19-21. Changes in SERT-mediated 5-HT clearance could thus affect all 5-HT-mediated ENS functions.

One major difference in 5-HT synthesis between the brain and the intestine is in the isoforms of tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), the key 5-HT biosynthetic enzyme, that each contains. One TPH isoform (TPH2) exists in the CNS while two (TPH1 and TPH2) exist in the intestine, each with its own distinct location; TPH1, located in enterochromaffin (EC) cells and in mast cells in mice and rats, synthesizes the largest pool (90%) of intestinal 5-HT. The remaining 10% is generated by TPH2, which resides in serotonergic neurons of the ENS15. TPH1 and TPH2-derived 5-HT play important, differing roles in intestinal development and function8,16,22. EC-cell-derived 5-HT stimulates extrinsic sensory nerves that transmit signals of discomfort to the CNS while the neuronal pool of 5-HT, partially through binding to the 5-HT4 receptor, can stimulate a variety of GI functions including enteric neurogenesis, motility and intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. In GI motility, TPH1- and TPH2-derived 5-HT may be complementary; although TPH2-derived 5-HT is the major modulator of GI motility, there may be a subtle, yet distinct role for TPH1-derived 5-HT in the coordination of GI peristalsis23-25. Abnormalities in SERT availability or efficacy may also affect 5-HT mediated GI function through alteration of TPH1 and/or TPH2 levels26.

Recent data has highlighted the potential importance of SERT in the brain-gut manifestations of ASD and developmental SSRI exposure26. ASD is a condition characterized by deficits in social interaction, deficient communication and repetitive behaviors27. ASD prevalence has increased substantially over the past several decades with the most recent studies suggesting a prevalence rate of 1 in 6828. Despite the commonality of the diagnosis, the etiologies underlying the condition are complex and largely unknown. This lack of understanding has delayed the creation of novel therapeutics to treat the condition. Although ASD is characterized behaviorally, it is often accompanied by GI problems. GI issues are over 4-fold more common in individuals with ASD and constipation is the most frequent complaint29. Further, the resulting discomfort that is generated by the GI problems is often accompanied by severe behavioral problems including self-injury and aggression29,30. It is not yet known why the GI, brain and behavioral manifestations simultaneously occur in this subset of individuals with ASD though there may be a connection to underlying abnormalities in SERT and 5-HT signaling.

Multiple SERT coding variants, that all confer SERT hyperactivity, are overexpressed in individuals with ASD11,31. Interestingly, platelet 5-HT, which is almost entirely derived from the GI tract, is increased in about one-third of individuals with ASD and has been shown to correlate with lower GI symptoms, such as constipation7,11. Knock-in mice containing the most common hyperactive SERT variant overexpressed in children with ASD, SERT Ala56, display hyperserotonemia, CNS- and ENS-based abnormalities, suggesting that constitutively increased SERT activity interferes with the 5-HT signaling required for normal brain and gut development and long-term function26,32. In the brain, these mice demonstrate high levels of 5-HT clearance, hypersensitivity of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors, and behavioral abnormalities reminiscent of ASD. ENS development is also markedly abnormal32. The myenteric and submucosal plexuses of the ENS are hypoplastic with abnormalities in neuronal subtypes specifically generated after serotonergic neurons during development. These include those subsets expressing tyrosine hydroxylase, calcitonin gene related peptide and gamma-aminobutyric acid26. These observations are consistent with the idea that the increased 5-HT clearance of SERT Ala56 mice interferes with enteric neurogenesis. A similar ENS phenotype is observed in TPH2KO mice, further supporting the notion that enteric neuronal 5-HT is an ENS growth factor and that factors that decrease neuronal 5-HT signaling cause decreases in enteric neuronal growth33.

The abnormalities in ENS development in the SERT Ala56 mice result in defective motility. GI motility measured both in vivo (GI transit time and colonic transit) and in vitro (velocity, frequency, and length of conduction of contracting migrating motor complexes [CMMCs]) are decreased in the SERT Ala56 mice26. Because CMMCs are exclusively ENS-dependent34, it is evident that the GI motor abnormality in the SERT Ala56 mice is directly related to the abnormal development of the ENS.

The SERT Ala56 hyperactive variant led to increased GI expression of both of the 5-HT biosynthetic enzymes TPH1 and TPH2, suggesting that the decrease in 5-HT signaling caused by SERT Ala56 may trigger a positive feedback response in both TPH1 and TPH2 –producing cells26. EC cells, which express TPH1, were increased in the SERT Ala56 intestine and may account for the increased abundance of TPH126.

When ENS anatomy and GI motility were examined in mice exposed to the SERT antagonist, fluoxetine during development, the intestinal abnormalities contrasted, in an almost mirror-image fashion, to those present in the SERT Ala56 mice. The ENS of the fluoxetine-treated mice was hyperplastic, with the neuronal subsets that were deficient in SERT Ala56 mice being particularly abundant26. CMMCS, measured in vitro, were increased in fluoxetine-exposed mice, demonstrating an ENS-centric abnormality that opposed the slower CMMCs demonstrated by the SERT Ala56 mice26. Further, in contrast to the SERT Ala56 mice, TPH1 was significantly greater in the WT mice compared to those that were fluoxetine-exposed. Central effects were also revealed in the fluoxetine-exposed mice; the inhibition of SERT during development resulted in an enhancement of central sympathetic activity, which slowed GI motility in vivo26. Prior studies support the idea that fluoxetine-exposed mice exhibit additional defects in brain development as well as behavioral anomalies including increased anxiety, depression and aggression35-39. Further, similar observations in enteric neurogenesis and GI motility were made in SERTKO mice, indicating that these abnormalities were the result of SERT dysfunction, rather than off-target effects of fluoxetine6.

In clinical studies, the impact of SERT antagonism on CNS and ENS development and function is best represented in studies of children exposed to SSRIs antenatally. SSRIs cross the placenta and are also present in breastmilk 40. Consequently, the embryo and the breast-feeding baby are directly exposed to SSRIs40. In these studies, the gut and behavioral anomalies noted in these children overlap with those shown in mice; Antenatal SSRI exposure has been associated with significant impairments in behavior and language41-46 as well as gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction (constipation), all of which can persist long-term47,48.

There are several major points highlighted by these findings. First, the contrast in ENS development and GI motility between the SERT Ala56 and fluoxetine-exposed mice illustrates that SERT efficiency is directly related to ENS development and the long-term regulation of GI motility. Further, the fluoxetine-treated animals were exposed to the drug exclusively through gestation and breastfeeding and were evaluated for differences in neurogenesis and motility at 6-10 weeks of age, allowing substantial time for drug washout. This finding suggests that it is the period of active neurodevelopment that is critical for the long-term effects of SERT function in enteric neurogenesis and motility. Finally, given the brain and intestinal abnormalities demonstrated in both humans and experimental models with SERT dysfunction, we can conclude that an abnormality in systemic SERT function can influence both brain and gut development and long-term functions in both the GI tract and in behavior.

Given that SERT dysfunction causes abnormalities in both brain and intestinal development, it is plausible that by circumventing SERT, we may be able to prevent SERT-modulated abnormalities in disorders that affect the brain and the intestine. This idea was tested by exposing SERT Ala56 mice to a 5-HT4 receptor agonist, prucalopride, during gestation and breastfeeding, which are the most active times of neurodevelopment26. The 5-HT4 receptor was targeted because of its established link to 5-HT–promoted enteric neurogenesis and GI motility49,50. Administration of prucalopride to the SERT Ala56 mice during gestation and weaning prevented the ENS hypoplasia, deficiencies of late-developing neurons, and the slowing of in vivo and in vitro GI transit26.

Overall, these studies reveal that enteric neurogenesis and GI motility are critically dependent on SERT activity during neurodevelopment and that SERT does this by modulating 5-HT signaling; More specifically, defective 5-HT signaling due to the increased 5-HT clearance, in SERT Ala56 mice, decreases enteric neurogenesis, whereas increased signaling due to genetic ablation (SERTKO) or its inhibition during development, with fluoxetine, enhances neurogenesis6. These findings also suggest that a global defect in SERT affects the CNS and well as the ENS in ASD and developmental SSRI exposure.

ASD is increasing in prevalence at a rapid rate and its impact on society is substantial. The extreme complexity and heterogeneity of the underlying etiologies of ASD51,52 makes the identification of biomarkers, such as hyperserotonemia, highly desirable. Biomarkers can assist in both the identification of sets of specific connecting traits and also in the effort to discover new pathways to account for disease pathophysiology. The SERT Ala56 mouse is the first experimental model that mimics the brain-gut-hyperserotonemia phenotype found in individuals with ASD6. Because gut-brain-behavior relationships cannot easily be disentangled in humans, this model is advantageous for the studies required to help elucidate these interactions. Further, while the data is supportive of the concept that abnormal serotonergic signaling pathways could be a common feature underlying the brain-gut connection ASD, a prospective human study will be needed for confirmation.

Our data supports the idea that fluoxetine exposure during neurodevelopment has a long-lasting impact on brain and gut function. Depression during pregnancy affects approximately 10% of women nationally. Untreated depression in pregnancy is associated with long-lasting developmental outcomes in children, including an increased risk of anxiety and depression, and a decrease in cognitive and social functioning63-66. These potential outcomes thus necessitate the consideration of treatment with antidepressants. SSRIs are prescribed to as many as 8% of all pregnant women nationally67. SSRIs are used as first line treatment for depression during pregnancy because they are thought to be safe compared to other antidepressants. SSRI exposure during pregnancy, however, has been linked to a 2-fold increase in congenital defects and long-term effects in language, behavior and GI dysmotility48. Given the importance of 5-HT signaling to ENS development and the long-lasting effects of fluoxetine treatment on gut function and sympathetic output, additional investigation may be warranted on the administration of antidepressants that affect SERT or 5-HT function to pregnant or lactating women. These risks must be considered while also accounting for the risks posed by untreated depression during pregnancy.

The potential effects of 5-HT and SERT in other conditions known to affect the brain and the gut also merit more study. Further investigation in this area may provide a greater understanding of the link between the anxiety, depression and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)54-57 as well as the pathophysiological connection between the stress and “flares”, or increased intestinal inflammation, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)58. Both IBD and IBS have been linked to changes in 5-HT signaling or SERT in both experimental models and clinical studies18,59.

A greater understanding of 5-HT signaling and SERT in brain-gut disease is likely to facilitate the creation of novel therapeutics to treat these intractable conditions. The ability of prucalopride to prevent SERT Ala56–associated defects in ENS development and GI motility supports the idea that SERT and 5-HT4 receptors play important roles in enteric neurogenesis and ENS-mediated functions. Interestingly, although 5-HT4 agonists were developed for treating chronic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome60, 5-HT4 has also been shown to affect neurogenesis in the CNS61 and may actually promote the hippocampal neurogenesis that underlies the neurogenesis induced by SSRIs62. Future studies should determine whether 5-HT4 receptor modulators are beneficial in treating ASD and the consequences of antenatal SSRI exposure and/or other brain-gut diseases.

Highlights.

  • Diseases with brain and intestinal anomalies may share a common etiology.

  • Such conditions include autism (ASD) or those exposed to SSRIs pre- and postnatally.

  • Serotonin and SERT play critical roles in brain and gut development and function.

  • Novel data demonstrate connections between serotonin and SERT and the brain-gut axis in ASD and developmental SSRI exposure.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by NIH grants NS15547, DK093786, and the Autism Research Institute.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Kelly JR, Clarke G, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Brain-gut-microbiota axis: challenges for translation in psychiatry. Ann Epidemiol. 2016 May;26(5):366–372. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yarandi SS, Peterson DA, Treisman GJ, Moran TH, Pasricha PJ. Modulatory Effects of Gut Microbiota on the Central Nervous System: How Gut Could Play a Role in Neuropsychiatric Health and Diseases. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Apr 30;22(2):201–212. doi: 10.5056/jnm15146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Keightley PC, Koloski NA, Talley NJ. Pathways in gut-brain communication: evidence for distinct gut-to-brain and brain-to-gut syndromes. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;49(3):207–214. doi: 10.1177/0004867415569801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mayer EA, Tillisch K, Gupta A. Gut/brain axis and the microbiota. J Clin Invest. 2015 Mar 2;125(3):926–938. doi: 10.1172/JCI76304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Forsythe P, Kunze W, Bienenstock J. Moody microbes or fecal phrenology: what do we know about the microbiota-gut-brain axis? BMC Med. 2016;14:58. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0604-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Margolis KG, Li Z, Stevanovic K, et al. Serotonin transporter variant drives preventable gastrointestinal abnormalities in development and function. J Clin Invest. 2016 Jun 1;126(6):2221–2235. doi: 10.1172/JCI84877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marler S, Ferguson BJ, Lee EB, et al. Brief Report: Whole Blood Serotonin Levels and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Mar;46(3):1124–1130. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2646-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li Z, Chalazonitis A, Huang YY, et al. Essential roles of enteric neuronal serotonin in gastrointestinal motility and the development/survival of enteric dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):8998–9009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6684-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kennedy PJ, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Clarke G. Kynurenine pathway metabolism and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Neuropharmacology. 2016 Jul 5; doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.O'Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Jan 15;277:32–48. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Muller CL, Anacker AM, Veenstra-VanderWeele J. The serotonin system in autism spectrum disorder: From biomarker to animal models. Neuroscience. 2016 May 3;321:24–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jaiswal P, Mohanakumar KP, Rajamma U. Serotonin mediated immunoregulation and neural functions: Complicity in the aetiology of autism spectrum disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev Aug. 2015;55:413–431. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brummelte S, Mc Glanaghy E, Bonnin A, Oberlander TF. Developmental changes in serotonin signaling: Implications for early brain function, behavior and adaptation. Neuroscience. 2016 Feb 22; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kepser LJ, Homberg JR. The neurodevelopmental effects of serotonin: a behavioural perspective. Behav Brain Res. 2015 Jan 15;277:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gershon MD. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013 Feb;20(1):4–21. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32835bc703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Margolis KG, Stevanovic K, Li Z, et al. Pharmacological reduction of mucosal but not neuronal serotonin opposes inflammation in mouse intestine. Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):928–937. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hoffman JM, Tyler K, MacEachern SJ, et al. Activation of colonic mucosal 5-HT(4) receptors accelerates propulsive motility and inhibits visceral hypersensitivity. Gastroenterology Apr. 2012;142(4):844–854. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.041. e844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mawe GM, Hoffman JM. Serotonin signalling in the gut–functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Aug. 2013;10(8):473–486. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Blakely RD, Berson HE, Fremeau RT, Jr, et al. Cloning and expression of a functional serotonin transporter from rat brain. Nature. 1991 Nov 7;354(6348):66–70. doi: 10.1038/354066a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen JX, Pan H, Rothman TP, Wade PR, Gershon MD. Guinea pig 5-HT transporter: cloning, expression, distribution, and function in intestinal sensory reception. Am J Physiol. 1998 Sep;275(3 Pt 1):G433–448. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1998.275.3.G433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wade PR, Chen J, Jaffe B, Kassem IS, Blakely RD, Gershon MD. Localization and function of a 5-HT transporter in crypt epithelia of the gastrointestinal tract. J Neurosci. 1996 Apr 1;16(7):2352–2364. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02352.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gross ER, Gershon MD, Margolis KG, Gertsberg ZV, Li Z, Cowles RA. Neuronal serotonin regulates growth of the intestinal mucosa in mice. Gastroenterology Aug. 2012;143(2):408–417. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.007. e402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heredia DJ, Gershon MD, Koh SD, Corrigan RD, Okamoto T, Smith TK. Important role of mucosal serotonin in colonic propulsion and peristaltic reflexes: in vitro analyses in mice lacking tryptophan hydroxylase 1. The Journal of physiology. 2013 Dec 1;591(23):5939–5957. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.256230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith TK, Park KJ, Hennig GW. Colonic migrating motor complexes, high amplitude propagating contractions, neural reflexes and the importance of neuronal and mucosal serotonin. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Oct 30;20(4):423–446. doi: 10.5056/jnm14092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Balasuriya GK, Hill-Yardin EL, Gershon MD, Bornstein JC. A sexually dimorphic effect of cholera toxin: rapid changes in colonic motility mediated via a 5-HT3 receptor dependent pathway in female C57Bl/6 mice. The Journal of physiology. 2016 Mar 18; doi: 10.1113/JP272071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Margolis KG, Li Z, Stevanovic K, et al. Serotonin transporter variant drives preventable gastrointestinal abnormalities in development and function. J Clin Invest. 2016 Apr 25; doi: 10.1172/JCI84877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Posar A, Resca F, Visconti P. Autism according to diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5(th) edition: The need for further improvements. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2015 Apr-Jun;10(2):146–148. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.159195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McPheeters ML, Weitlauf A, Vehorn A, et al. Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McElhanon BO, McCracken C, Karpen S, Sharp WG. Gastrointestinal symptoms in autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):872–883. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Buie T, Campbell DB, Fuchs GJ, 3, et al. Evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders in individuals with ASDs: a consensus report. Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(Suppl 1):S1–18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1878C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Prasad HC, Steiner JA, Sutcliffe JS, Blakely RD. Enhanced activity of human serotonin transporter variants associated with autism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 27;364(1514):163–173. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Veenstra-VanderWeele J, Muller CL, Iwamoto H, et al. Autism gene variant causes hyperserotonemia, serotonin receptor hypersensitivity, social impairment and repetitive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 3;109(14):5469–5474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112345109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Z, Chalazonitis A, Huang YY, et al. Essential roles of enteric neuronal serotonin in gastrointestinal motility and the development/survival of enteric dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):8998–9009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6684-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Spencer NJ, Bywater RA. Enteric nerve stimulation evokes a premature colonic migrating motor complex in mouse. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2002 Dec;14(6):657–665. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00367.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ansorge MS, Morelli E, Gingrich JA. Inhibition of serotonin but not norepinephrine transport during development produces delayed, persistent perturbations of emotional behaviors in mice. J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 2;28(1):199–207. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3973-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kiryanova V, McAllister BB, Dyck RH. Long-term outcomes of developmental exposure to fluoxetine: a review of the animal literature. Dev Neurosci. 2013;35(6):437–439. doi: 10.1159/000355709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Smit-Rigter LA, Noorlander CW, von Oerthel L, Chameau P, Smidt MP, van Hooft JA. Prenatal fluoxetine exposure induces life-long serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor-dependent cortical abnormalities and anxiety-like behaviour. Neuropharmacology. 2012 Feb;62(2):865–870. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Svirsky N, Levy S, Avitsur R. Prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) increases aggression and modulates maternal behavior in offspring mice. Dev Psychobiol. 2016 Jan;58(1):71–82. doi: 10.1002/dev.21356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Umemori J, Winkel F, Castren E, Karpova NN. Distinct effects of perinatal exposure to fluoxetine or methylmercury on parvalbumin and perineuronal nets, the markers of critical periods in brain development. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015 Aug;44:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sie SD, Wennink JM, van Driel JJ, et al. Maternal use of SSRIs, SNRIs and NaSSAs: practical recommendations during pregnancy and lactation. Archives of disease in childhood Fetal and neonatal edition. 2012 Nov;97(6):F472–476. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-214239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Casper RC, Gilles AA, Fleisher BE, Baran J, Enns G, Lazzeroni LC. Length of prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: effects on neonatal adaptation and psychomotor development. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011 Sep;217(2):211–219. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2270-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hanley GE, Brain U, Oberlander TF. Infant developmental outcomes following prenatal exposure to antidepressants, and maternal depressed mood and positive affect. Early Hum Dev. 2013 Aug;89(8):519–524. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Johnson KC, Smith AK, Stowe ZN, Newport DJ, Brennan PA. Preschool outcomes following prenatal serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure: differences in language and behavior, but not cognitive function. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;77(2):e176–182. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Misri S, Reebye P, Kendrick K, et al. Internalizing behaviors in 4-year-old children exposed in utero to psychotropic medications. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;163(6):1026–1032. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.6.1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nulman I, Koren G, Rovet J, et al. Neurodevelopment of children following prenatal exposure to venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or untreated maternal depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;169(11):1165–1174. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Oberlander TF, Reebye P, Misri S, Papsdorf M, Kim J, Grunau RE. Externalizing and attentional behaviors in children of depressed mothers treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant during pregnancy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jan;161(1):22–29. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nijenhuis CM, Horst PG, Berg LT, Wilffert B. Disturbed development of the enteric nervous system after in utero exposure of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Part 1: Literature review. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2012 Jan;73(1):16–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04075.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nijenhuis CM, ter Horst PG, van Rein N, Wilffert B, de Jong-van den Berg LT. Disturbed development of the enteric nervous system after in utero exposure of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Part 2: Testing the hypotheses. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;73(1):126–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04081.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu MT, Kuan YH, Wang J, Hen R, Gershon MD. 5-HT4 receptor-mediated neuroprotection and neurogenesis in the enteric nervous system of adult mice. J Neurosci. 2009 Aug 5;29(31):9683–9699. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1145-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Diederen K, Mugie SM, Benninga MA. Efficacy and safety of prucalopride in adults and children with chronic constipation. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 Feb;16(3):407–416. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.996547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sener EF, Canatan H, Ozkul Y. Recent Advances in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Applications of Whole Exome Sequencing Technology. Psychiatry Investig. 2016 May;13(3):255–264. doi: 10.4306/pi.2016.13.3.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ziats MN, Rennert OM. The Evolving Diagnostic and Genetic Landscapes of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front Genet. 2016;7:65. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yonkers KA, Blackwell KA, Glover J, Forray A. Antidepressant use in pregnant and postpartum women. Annual review of clinical psychology. 2014;10:369–392. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Moloney RD, Johnson AC, O'Mahony SM, Dinan TG, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B, Cryan JF. Stress and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Visceral Pain: Relevance to Irritable Bowel Syndrome. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016 Feb;22(2):102–117. doi: 10.1111/cns.12490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Moloney RD, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Stress & the microbiota-gut-brain axis in visceral pain. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Nov;61:8. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hyland NP, O'Mahony SM, O'Malley D, O'Mahony CM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Early-life stress selectively affects gastrointestinal but not behavioral responses in a genetic model of brain-gut axis dysfunction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Jan;27(1):105–113. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Muscatello MR, Bruno A, Mento C, Pandolfo G, Zoccali RA. Personality traits and emotional patterns in irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 28;22(28):6402–6415. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i28.6402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brooks AJ, Rowse G, Ryder A, Peach EJ, Corfe BM, Lobo AJ. Systematic review: psychological morbidity in young people with inflammatory bowel disease -risk factors and impacts. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jul;44(1):3–15. doi: 10.1111/apt.13645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Margolis KG, Gershon MD. Enteric Neuronal Regulation of Intestinal Inflammation. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Sep;39(9):614–624. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shin A, Camilleri M, Kolar G, Erwin P, West CP, Murad MH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: highly selective 5-HT4 agonists (prucalopride, velusetrag or naronapride) in chronic constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb;39(3):239–253. doi: 10.1111/apt.12571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lucas G, Rymar VV, Du J, et al. Serotonin(4) (5-HT(4)) receptor agonists are putative antidepressants with a rapid onset of action. Neuron. 2007 Sep 6;55(5):712–725. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kobayashi K, Ikeda Y, Sakai A, et al. Reversal of hippocampal neuronal maturation by serotonergic antidepressants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 4;107(18):8434–8439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912690107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Alwan S, Friedman JM, Chambers C. Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Pregnancy: A Review of Current Evidence. CNS Drugs. 2016 May 2; doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Malm H, Brown AS, Gissler M, et al. Gestational Exposure to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Offspring Psychiatric Disorders: A National Register-Based Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2016 May;55(5):359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Apter-Levy Y, Feldman M, Vakart A, Ebstein RP, Feldman R. Impact of maternal depression across the first 6 years of life on the child's mental health, social engagement, and empathy: The moderating role of oxytocin. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;170(10):1161–1168. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12121597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.O'Connor TG, Monk C, Burke AS. Maternal Affective Illness in the Perinatal Period and Child Development: Findings on Developmental Timing, Mechanisms, and Intervention. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Mar;18(3):24. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0660-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Oberlander TF, Warburton W, Misri S, Aghajanian J, Hertzman C. Effects of timing and duration of gestational exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants: population-based study. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 2008 May;192(5):338–343. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES