Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 2017 Apr 5;83(9):2027–2033. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13282

MicroRNA‐122 can be measured in capillary blood which facilitates point‐of‐care testing for drug‐induced liver injury

A D Bastiaan Vliegenthart 1, Cécile Berends 1, Carmelita M J Potter 1, Maiwenn Kersaudy‐Kerhoas 2,3, James W Dear 1,
PMCID: PMC5555871  PMID: 28257154

Abstract

Aims

Liver‐enriched microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) is a novel circulating biomarker for drug‐induced liver injury (DILI). To date, miR‐122 has been measured in serum or plasma venous samples. If miR‐122 could be measured in capillary blood obtained from a finger prick it would facilitate point‐of‐care testing, such as in resource‐limited settings that have a high burden of DILI.

Methods

In this study, in healthy subjects, miR‐122 was measured by polymerase chain reaction in three capillary blood drops taken from different fingers and in venous blood and plasma (n = 20). miR‐122 was also measured in capillary blood obtained from patients with DILI (n = 8).

Results

Circulating miR‐122 could be readily measured in a capillary blood drop in healthy volunteers with a median (interquartile range) cycle threshold (Ct) of 32.6 (31.1–34.2). The coefficient of variation for intraindividual variability across replicate blood drops was 49.9%. Capillary miR‐122 faithfully reflected the concentration in venous blood and plasma (Pearson R = 0.89, P < 0.0001; 0.88, P < 0.0001, respectively). miR‐122 was 86‐fold higher in DILI patients [median value 1.0 × 108 (interquartile range 1.89 × 107–3.04 × 109) copies/blood drop] compared to healthy subjects [1.85 × 106 (4.92 × 105–5.88 × 106) copies/blood drop]. Receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that capillary miR‐122 sensitively and specifically reported DILI (area under the curve: 0.96, P = 0.0002).

Conclusion

This work supports the potential use of miR‐122 as biomarker of human DILI when measured in a capillary blood drop. With development across DILI aetiologies, this could be used by novel point‐of‐care technologies to produce a minimally invasive, near‐patient, diagnostic test.

Keywords: finger prick, liver toxicity, microRNA, miR‐122, point‐of‐care

What is Already Known about this Subject

  • Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) is a major healthcare challenge in western countries and in resource‐limited settings.

  • microRNA‐122 (miR‐122) has substantial promise as a sensitive and specific biomarker of hepatocyte injury when measured in venous samples.

What this Study Adds

  • miR‐122 can be quantified reliably in a capillary blood drop from a finger prick.

  • Capillary miR‐122 faithfully reflects the plasma and venous whole blood concentration.

  • Capillary miR‐122 can identify patients with DILI with high sensitivity and specificity.

  • If combined with a novel point‐of‐care detection platform, capillary miR‐122 could allow near patient testing for DILI.

Introduction

Drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) presents a major burden to clinical medicine and is a common cause of drug failure during clinical development 1. In western clinical medicine, about half of the cases of acute liver failure are caused by DILI 2. In the developing world, cotreatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of DILI. Globally, an estimated 37 million people are HIV‐positive, with eastern and southern Africa carrying the highest burden with an estimated 19 million people infected 3. The South African, TB incidence is particularly high; new diagnoses being 834 per 100 000 per annum 4. TB prevalence is high in people coinfected with HIV, with 42% of HIV‐positive TB cases receiving both TB and antiretroviral treatment 5. DILI complicates TB treatment in up to 33% of cases 6, and in South Africa the in‐hospital mortality from DILI has been reported to be around 30% 5.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small (~22 nucleotides long) nonprotein‐coding RNAs involved in post‐transcriptional gene regulation 7. In the circulation, miRNAs are protected from degradation by binding to RNA protein complexes (such as argonaute 2) and high‐density lipoproteins, and being encapsulated in extracellular vesicles such as exosomes 8, 9. As miRNAs are amplifiable and some are tissue enriched 10, they have emerged as a reservoir for the discovery of biomarkers that report organ injury 11.

The liver enriched miRNA‐122 (miR‐122) is a circulating biomarker of DILI. miR‐122 is released into the circulation when hepatocytes are injured and is a translational safety biomarker across zebrafish 12, rodents 13 and humans 14, 15, 16. In humans, miR‐122 is around 100‐fold higher in paracetamol overdose patients with DILI compared to those patients without liver injury 17 and is able to report DILI soon after overdose when serum alanine transaminase (ALT) activity is still in the normal range 14, 15, 18. Circulating miR‐122 is not DILI specific but is specific for hepatocyte injury. It is also increased in patients with cholestyramine‐induced liver injury 19, ischemic hepatitis 20, viral hepatitis 21 and cholestatic liver injury 22. In these published studies serum or plasma venous samples have been analysed in specialist laboratories with time‐consuming and expensive kits. There is an unmet need for assays that can rapidly and accurately measure miRNA at the point‐of‐care (POC) 23. Ideally, a POC assay would measure miR‐122 in a single blood drop from a finger prick, be affordable for use in resource‐limited settings and suitable for use near, or actually in, a patient's home 24. Such an assay could provide an early signal of DILI in patients at elevated risk, for instance, following prescription of antimicrobials with a significant DILI liability 25, 26, 27. With development, serial monitoring of miR‐122 could improve patient safety by allowing medication change before life‐threatening liver failure develops and by supporting safe reintroduction of treatment after interruption. In commercial drug development, measurement of miR‐122 using a finger prick could reduce the need for venepuncture, which is especially advantageous in certain groups such as children and when multiple serial measurements in the same person are required.

The aims of this study were to determine if miR‐122 can be measured in a capillary blood drop from a finger prick and to compare the concentration with venous blood and plasma; to assess the intraindividual variability of capillary miR‐122 concentration and to establish proof of concept as to whether capillary miR‐122 can report DILI in patients.

Material and methods

The study was approved by the research ethics committee (East Midlands – Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Healthy volunteers

Healthy volunteers were eligible if they had no history of liver disease, were taking no medications and were willing to give blood samples by venepuncture and finger prick.

Drug‐induced liver injury patients

A total of eight adult patients (age 24–82 years) admitted to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK with DILI were entered into the study. In each patient, causality of liver injury was scored as definitive by the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method 28.

Blood collection

Blood was collected in EDTA tubes by venepuncture. Immediately, a 50 μL aliquot was collected in 1 mL of Qiazol (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) for whole blood analysis. The remaining blood was centrifuged at 11 000 × g for 15 min at 4°C after which the supernatant was separated into aliquots and frozen at –80°C until miRNA extraction.

Three finger‐prick blood drops (BD1: index finger, BD2: middle finger, BD3: ring finger) per healthy volunteer were obtained using disposable lancets that are used in routine clinical practice for glucose measurement (Accu‐Chek, Roche, Basel, Switzerland – adjustable depth settings 1.8 mm). In DILI patients, one blood drop from the index finger was collected. After blood drop collection, Qiazol (1 ml) was added to each sample. All samples were stored at –80°C until analysis.

MicroRNA extraction

MicroRNA was extracted using miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer's instructions. For venous blood and plasma, 50 μl of sample was used in combination with 150 μl nuclease free water. For capillary blood, 200 μl nuclease free water was added to the Qiazol containing each blood drop.

Real‐time polymerase chain reaction

From each sample, 2.5 μl of RNA eluate was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer's instructions. The synthesized cDNA was 5‐fold diluted and used for cDNA template in combination with the miScript SYBR Green polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Kit (Qiagen) using the specific miScript assays (Qiagen). Real‐time PCR was performed in duplicate on a Light Cycler 480 (Roche) using the recommended miScript cycling parameters.

Absolute quantitation of miRNA was achieved by generating a standard curve using synthetic target. Standard curves were generated by reverse transcribing known concentrations of miScript miRNA mimics (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) in 0.1X TE buffer spiked with 10 ng μl–1 Poly‐C (Sigma–Aldrich, Gillingham, UK). The resulting cDNA was measured using serial dilutions on three different plates on 3 different days to demonstrate minimal variability [interassay coefficient of variation (CV): 3.4%]. The calibration curve was linear in the cycle threshold (Ct) range of 20.0–36.1. A Ct value of 37.1 was obtained in water control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences, correlations and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed using Graphpad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California, USA). Nominal statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Capillary miR‐122 can be measured in a finger prick blood drop

A total of 20 adults (14 females, median age 24 years; range 21–31 years) were recruited to this study. First it was determined whether a capillary blood drop yields sufficient miR‐122 for robust quantification. Capillary blood Ct values (obtained by quantitative PCR) were all within the linear range of the calibration curve [mean (range) 32.6 (29.1–35.4)]. Copy numbers of miR‐122 per blood drop in the healthy controls are presented in Table 1. Across the replicate drops from different fingers the mean CV (± standard deviation) was 49.9 ± 28.9%. The CV ± standard deviation of duplicate PCR measurements of the same blood drop was 0.94 ± 1.29%.

Table 1.

Copy numbers of capillary miR‐122 per blood drop (BD1: index finger; BD2: middle finger; BD3: ring finger) in healthy volunteers. The coefficient of variation (CV) across the three blood drops is presented

Healthy volunteer number BD1 (copy/drop) BD2 (copy/drop) BD3 (copy/drop) CV (%)
1 0.45 × 106 0.40 × 106 1.53 × 106 81.13
2 3.39 × 106 11.5 × 106 4.11 × 106 71.14
3 0.29 × 106 0.41 × 106 0.11 × 106 54.52
4 0.24 × 106 0.11 × 105 0.20 × 106 37.15
5 0.59 × 106 0.17 × 106 0.42 × 106 54.17
6 1.25 × 106 0.91 × 106 0.69 × 106 29.85
7 0.11 × 106 0.20 × 106 0.28 × 106 43.24
8 2.85 × 106 5.20 × 106 1.18 × 106 65.70
9 1.53 × 106 0.89 × 106 0.69 × 106 42.28
10 0.29 × 106 0.23 × 106 4.45 × 106 146.1
11 0.13 × 106 0.14 × 106 0.19 × 106 20.47
12 1.37 × 106 2.81 × 106 1.93 × 106 35.53
13 2.09 × 106 0.64 × 106 1.20 × 106 56.18
14 1.53 × 106 6.40 × 106 5.52 × 106 57.85
15 5.06 × 106 9.52 × 106 8.79 × 106 30.74
16 10.6 × 106 9.07 × 106 10.3 × 106 8.00
17 7.61 × 106 9.37 × 106 5.70 × 106 24.26
18 1.81 × 106 3.00 × 106 5.18 × 106 51.21
19 4.70 × 106 2.69 × 106 2.79 × 106 33.44
20 36.6 × 106 36.3 × 106 10.3 × 106 54.38
Mean 4.12 × 106 5.00 × 106 3.28 × 106 49.87

Capillary miR‐122 correlates with venous blood and plasma

Across the healthy volunteers, the relationship between copy numbers of miR‐122 per blood drop and copy numbers of miR‐122 per mL of venous blood and plasma was determined. Copy number of miR‐122 per blood drop significantly correlated with miR‐122 measured in venous blood and plasma (P < 0.0001, Figure 1A, B). The correlation coefficients (R 2) were 0.80 and 0.78 and the Pearson R values [95% confidence interval (CI)] were 0.89 (0.75–0.96) and 0.88 (0.72–0.95), both P < 0.0001, in venous blood and plasma, respectively. As would be expected there was a significant correlation between venous blood and plasma miR122 (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scatter graphs. Correlation between copy numbers of miR‐122 per mL (A) venous blood or (B) plasma and copy numbers of miR‐122 per capillary blood drop. (C) correlation between copy numbers of miR‐122 per mL venous blood and plasma in each healthy volunteer (n = 20). Pearson R values are 0.89 (P < 0.0001), 0.88 (P < 0.0001) and 0.92 (P < 0.0001), respectively (Pearson's correlation test). Blood drop values represent the mean copy number measured in three drops, error bars represent standard errors of the mean

Liver‐enriched miRNA‐122 is higher in ALI patients

Capillary miR‐122 was measured in blood drop samples obtained from patients with DILI (n = 8) and compared with healthy volunteers (n = 20). Clinical parameters of the DILI patient cohort are summarized in Table 2, along with their capillary miR‐122 concentrations. In the single case of nonparacetamol DILI (induced by nitrofurantion) other causes of liver disease such as viral hepatitis (A–E) were excluded. miR‐122 was increased 86 fold in DILI patients [median 1.58 × 108 (interquartile range 4.67 × 106–4.51 × 109) copies/blood drop] compared to healthy volunteers [1.85 × 106 (1.53 × 105–2.77 × 107) copies/blood drop] P = 0.004 (Figure 2). ROC analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of miR‐122 for detecting DILI (Figure 3). Capillary miR‐122 had high sensitivity and specificity (area under the curve; 0.96 (95%CI 0.89–1.04), P = 0.0002, sensitivity: 86% at 90% specificity).

Table 2.

Clinical parameters of the patient cohort with drug‐induced liver injury (DILI).

Patient Age (years) Sex ALT activity (U l–1) INR Serum creatinine (μmol l–1) ALP activity (U/L) Bilirubin (μmol dl–1) Aetiology Copies miR‐122/ drop
1 82 F 3475 2 50 74 29 Paracetamol 1.58 × 108
2 44 F 10 543 6.9 47 101 106 Paracetamol 4.51 × 109
3 54 F 1210 8.9 66 236 162 Nitrofurantoin 4.09 × 107
4 24 F 1608 1.4 79 239 224 Paracetamol 1.58 × 108
5 29 M 1143 1.7 52 43 17 Paracetamol 5.64 × 107
6 25 M 1653 1.9 72 147 58 Paracetamol 1.66 × 109
7 45 M 1131 1.5 65 79 34 Paracetamol 3.50 × 109
8 35 M 1101 1.8 57 141 32 Paracetamol 1.16 × 107

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; INR, international normalized ratio; serum creatinine; ALP, alkaline phosphatise; bilirubin and aetiology of DILI are presented

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Copy number of miR‐122 per blood drop from healthy volunteers (n = 20) and drug‐induced liver injury patients (n = 8). Data are presented as a Tukey plot. In healthy volunteers, the mean copy number measured in three drops was used

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis with respect to blood drop miR‐122 as a discriminator of drug‐induced liver injury patients from healthy volunteers. Area under the curve (AUC), statistical significance and sensitivity (SENS) at 90% specificity (95%CI) are presented

Discussion

This study has demonstrated, for the first time, that capillary miR‐122 can be measured in a single blood drop to report DILI. This facilitates point‐of‐care measurement out with hospital, such as in the developing world where the burden of DILI is substantial.

When measured in capillary blood, the miR‐122 Ct values were all within the quantifiable range of the PCR assay that had a linear calibration curve up to a Ct of 36. Intraindividual variability was tested by comparing three different blood drops taken from the same volunteer and resulted in an average CV of around 50%. Respectively, the intra‐assay and interassay CVs of the PCR assay were only 0.94% and 3.4%, therefore the CV across the blood drops probably represents the variable volumes of the blood drops obtained during the collection procedure. The intraindividual CV of blood drop volume obtained from a finger has been reported to be 83% 29. This is comparable to the intraindividual CV of miR‐122 measured in our study. In a future POC assay, the variability of sample volume could be reduced by automated microchip sample processing technologies 30, 31 as already applied in test strips for international normalized ratio (INR) POC testing in the context of warfarin dosing 32. Furthermore, as the circulating concentration of miR‐122 increases up to a 100 fold in DILI patients 14, a CV of 50% would be expected to have little effect on the detection of DILI.

The concentration of capillary miR‐122 measured in blood drops strongly correlated with blood and plasma obtained from venepuncture. This provides reassurance that our data reflect circulating concentrations. Furthermore, capillary miR‐122 was significantly higher in blood drops from patients with DILI compared to healthy volunteers with a median fold increase of 86 and a ROC curve area under the curve of 0.96. These data confirm that the dynamic changes and the sensitivity to report DILI is similar between blood drops and earlier reported results from serum/plasma venous samples 14, 15. A challenge in using circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for human pathology is that the contribution of different tissues to the circulating pool is often unknown. Most miRNAs are expressed in multiple cell types, by contrast miR‐122 is highly specific for the liver 33, 34. miR‐122 is not expressed in platelets, T‐cells, B‐cells, granulocytes or erythrocytes, which contain a wide variety of other miRNA species 35. This makes miR‐122 suitable for accurate measurement in whole blood without need for plasma or serum isolation.

There is an urgent need for improved DILI monitoring in the developing world where cotreatment of HIV and TB is a common cause 5. However, despite the need, DILI monitoring in resource‐limited settings is often restricted by practical concerns. The requirement for expensive tools and highly trained technicians can mean testing is only done in centralized or regional laboratories 24. Moreover, many patients undergoing TB treatment in resource‐limited settings have a negative association with venepuncture itself, do not have a primary care physician and do not value regular visits to a health care professional for health maintenance, which reduces potential participation in DILI monitoring 36. A rapid POC test for measuring miR‐122 from a single blood drop would mean that the patient undergoing TB and/or HIV treatment could use the assay at home (or near home). This study has demonstrated that a blood drop can be used as the matrix to measure miR‐122. Recently, substantial effort has been spent in developing highly sensitive, rapid, reliable and low‐cost methods for measuring miRNAs in minimal sample volumes. Electrochemical DNA hybridization sensors have potential as detection techniques in a POC test because this technology can detect specific miRNAs in the attomolar range without PCR amplification 37. Other promising miRNA detection methods include nanoparticle‐based optical technologies 38, surface plasmon resonance 39, 40 and amplification‐free fluorescence‐based assays 41, 42. As miR‐122 is a relatively high‐concentration, organ‐specific, circulating miRNA with a large dynamic range in disease it represents an ideal target for assay development with line of sight on a commercial product tackling a global health need.

This is an early phase proof of concept study that predominately used paracetamol toxicity as the model of DILI (seven of eight patients). Work is now required to determine whether capillary miR‐122 has clinical utility in DILI caused by other drugs, especially antimicrobials. In conclusion, this work supports the potential use of miR‐122 as biomarker of human DILI when measured in a blood drop from a finger prick. This could be used by novel POC technologies to produce a minimally invasive, near patient, diagnostic for DILI that has enhanced sensitivity and specificity compared to current tests.

Competing Interests

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author ADBV was supported by an National Centre for the Replacement Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) PhD Studentship (NC/K001485/1). Author JWD acknowledges the support of an NHS Research Scotland (NRS) Career Research Fellowship through NHS Lothian and the UK Regenerative Medicine Platform Niche Hub.

Contributors

The experiments were performed by A.D.B.V., C.B. and C.P. Analysis was by M.K.K. and the study was co‐ordinated by J.W.D.

Vliegenthart, A. D. B. , Berends, C. , Potter, C. M. J. , Kersaudy‐Kerhoas, M. , and Dear, J. W. (2017) MicroRNA‐122 can be measured in capillary blood which facilitates point‐of‐care testing for drug‐induced liver injury. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 83: 2027–2033. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13282.

References

  • 1. Giacomini KM, Krauss RM, Roden DM, Eichelbaum M, Hayden MR, Nakamura Y. When good drugs go bad. Nature 2007; 446: 975–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kaplowitz N. Idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005; 4: 489–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. UNAIDS . Fact sheet 2016, 2016.
  • 4. WHO . Global tuberclosis report, 2015.
  • 5. Schutz C, Ismail Z, Proxenos CJ, Marais S, Burton R, Kenyon C, et al. Burden of antituberculosis and antiretroviral drug‐induced liver injury at a secondary hospital in South Africa. S Afr Med J 2012; 102: 506–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Saukkonen JJ, Cohn DL, Jasmer RM, Schenker S, Jereb JA, Nolan CM, et al. An official ATS statement: hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 935–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009; 136: 215–233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova‐Agadjanyan EL, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood‐based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 10513–10518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Vickers KC, Palmisano BT, Shoucri BM, Shamburek RD, Remaley AT. MicroRNAs are transported in plasma and delivered to recipient cells by high‐density lipoproteins. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13: 423–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Liang Y, Ridzon D, Wong L, Chen C. Characterization of microRNA expression profiles in normal human tissues. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Szabo G, Bala S. MicroRNAs in liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 10: 542–552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Vliegenthart AD, Starkey Lewis P, Tucker CS, Del Pozo J, Rider S, Antoine DJ, et al. Retro‐orbital blood acquisition facilitates circulating microRNA measurement in zebrafish with paracetamol hepatotoxicity. Zebrafish 2014; 11: 219–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang K, Zhang S, Marzolf B, Troisch P, Brightman A, Hu Z, et al. Circulating microRNAs, potential biomarkers for drug‐induced liver injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 4402–4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Vliegenthart AD, Shaffer JM, Clarke JI, Peeters LE, Caporali A, Bateman DN, et al. Comprehensive microRNA profiling in acetaminophen toxicity identifies novel circulating biomarkers for human liver and kidney injury. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 15501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Antoine DJ, Dear JW, Lewis PS, Platt V, Coyle J, Masson M, et al. Mechanistic biomarkers provide early and sensitive detection of acetaminophen‐induced acute liver injury at first presentation to hospital. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md)2013; 58: 777–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Krauskopf J, Caiment F, Claessen SM, Johnson KJ, Warner RL, Schomaker SJ, et al. Application of high‐throughput sequencing to circulating microRNAs reveals novel biomarkers for drug‐induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci 2015; 143: 268–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Starkey Lewis PJ, Dear J, Platt V, Simpson KJ, Craig DG, Antoine DJ, et al. Circulating microRNAs as potential markers of human drug‐induced liver injury. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md)2011; 54: 1767–1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dear JW, Antoine DJ, Starkey‐Lewis P, Goldring CE, Park BK. Early detection of paracetamol toxicity using circulating liver microRNA and markers of cell necrosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 77: 904–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Singhal R, Harrill AH, Menguy‐Vacheron F, Jayyosi Z, Benzerdjeb H, Watkins PB. Benign elevations in serum aminotransferases and biomarkers of hepatotoxicity in healthy volunteers treated with cholestyramine. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2014; 15: 42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ward J, Kanchagar C, Veksler‐Lublinsky I, Lee RC, McGill MR, Jaeschke H, et al. Circulating microRNA profiles in human patients with acetaminophen hepatotoxicity or ischemic hepatitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111: 12169–12174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhang Y, Jia Y, Zheng R, Guo Y, Wang Y, Guo H, et al. Plasma microRNA‐122 as a biomarker for viral‐, alcohol‐, and chemical‐related hepatic diseases. Clin Chem 2010; 56: 1830–1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Shifeng H, Danni W, Pu C, Ping Y, Ju C, Liping Z. Circulating liver‐specific miR‐122 as a novel potential biomarker for diagnosis of cholestatic liver injury. PLoS One 2013; 8: e73133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Vliegenthart AD, Antoine DJ, Dear JW. Target biomarker profile for the clinical management of paracetamol overdose. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80: 351–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pollock NR, Rolland JP, Kumar S, Beattie PD, Jain S, Noubary F, et al. A paper‐based multiplexed transaminase test for low‐cost, point‐of‐care liver function testing. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4: 152ra29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ostapowicz G, Fontana RJ, Schiodt FV, Larson A, Davern TJ, Han SH, et al. Results of a prospective study of acute liver failure at 17 tertiary care centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 947–954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kumar R, Bhatia V, Khanal S, Sreenivas V, Gupta SD, Panda SK, et al. Antituberculosis therapy‐induced acute liver failure: magnitude, profile, prognosis, and predictors of outcome. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md)2010; 51: 1665–1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jones M, Nunez M. Liver toxicity of antiretroviral drugs. Semin Liver Dis 2012; 32: 167–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Danan G, Teschke R. RUCAM in drug and herb induced liver injury: the update. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Grady M, Pineau M, Pynes MK, Katz LB, Ginsberg B. A clinical evaluation of routine blood sampling practices in patients with diabetes: impact on fingerstick blood volume and pain. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014; 8: 691–698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Song Y, Huang YY, Liu X, Zhang X, Ferrari M, Qin L. Point‐of‐care technologies for molecular diagnostics using a drop of blood. Trends Biotechnol 2014; 32: 132–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cui F, Rhee M, Singh A, Tripathi A. Microfluidic sample preparation for medical diagnostics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2015; 17: 267–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Pluddemann A, Thompson M, Wolstenholme J, Price CP, Heneghan C. Point‐of‐care INR coagulometers for self‐management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update. Br J Gen Pract 2012; 62: e798–e800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ludwig N, Leidinger P, Becker K, Backes C, Fehlmann T, Pallasch C, et al. Distribution of miRNA expression across human tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44: 3865–3877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Landgraf P, Rusu M, Sheridan R, Sewer A, Iovino N, Aravin A, et al. A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell 2007; 129: 1401–1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Teruel‐Montoya R, Kong X, Abraham S, Ma L, Kunapuli SP, Holinstat M, et al. MicroRNA expression differences in human hematopoietic cell lineages enable regulated transgene expression. PLoS One 2014; 9: e102259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Shieh FK, Snyder G, Horsburgh CR, Bernardo J, Murphy C, Saukkonen JJ. Predicting non‐completion of treatment for latent tuberculous infection: a prospective survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174: 717–721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Campuzano S, Pedrero M, Pingarron JM. Electrochemical genosensors for the detection of cancer‐related miRNAs. Anal Bioanal Chem 2014; 406: 27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang J, Cui D. Nanoparticle‐based optical detection of MicroRNA. Nano Biomed Eng 2013; 5: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ding X, Yan Y, Li S, Zhang Y, Cheng W, Cheng Q, et al. Surface plasmon resonance biosensor for highly sensitive detection of microRNA based on DNA super‐sandwich assemblies and streptavidin signal amplification. Anal Chim Acta 2015; 874: 59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Li X, Cheng W, Li D, Wu J, Ding X, Cheng Q, et al. A novel surface plasmon resonance biosensor for enzyme‐free and highly sensitive detection of microRNA based on multi component nucleic acid enzyme (MNAzyme)‐mediated catalyzed hairpin assembly. Biosens Bioelectron 2016; 80: 98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Arata H, Hosokawa K, Maeda M. Rapid sub‐attomole microRNA detection on a portable microfluidic chip. Anal Sci 2014; 30: 129–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ishihara R, Hasegawa K, Hosokawa K, Maeda M. Multiplex microRNA detection on a power‐free microfluidic Chip with laminar flow‐assisted dendritic amplification. Anal Sci 2015; 31: 573–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES