Skip to main content
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
. 2017 May 31;83(9):2120–2122. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13309

Pharmacogenetic analysis of irreversible severe cisplatin‐induced nephropathy: a case report of a 27‐year‐old woman

Corine de Jong 1, Stefan Sanders 1, Geert‐Jan Creemers 2, Artur M Burylo 3, Margot Taks 1, Jan HM Schellens 4,5, Maarten J Deenen 1,6,
PMCID: PMC5555872  PMID: 28560854

Abstract

In this report we describe a young patient diagnosed with bulky FIGO stage IIIb squamous cell cervix carcinoma with severe and irreversible nephropathy after three weekly low‐doses of cisplatin. Besides several known risk factors such as hypomagnesemia and hypoalbuminemia, the patient also proved to be homozygously polymorphic for two polymorphisms within the COMT gene (c.615 + 310C>T and c.616–367C>T). As COMT polymorphism has been associated with cisplatin‐induced ototoxicity, its effect on nephrotoxicity of cisplatin should be the subject of further investigation.

Keywords: cisplatin, genotyping, nephrotoxicity, pharmacogenomics

Tables of Links

LIGANDS
Cisplatin

These Tables list key protein targets and ligands in this article that are hyperlinked to corresponding entries in http://www.guidetopharmacology.org, the common portal for data from the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 1, and are permanently archived in the Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 2.

Cisplatin is a widely used anticancer drug for the treatment of various solid tumours, including gastric, ovarian, testicular and lung cancer. Treatment with cisplatin is frequently associated with severe side effects such as nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity 3. Despite intensive prophylactic measures, kidney damage occurs in one‐third of patients and remains the most important complication that may limit further treatment 4. Susceptibility to cisplatin nephrotoxicity is known to vary between individuals. Identified risk factors include co‐administration with nephrotoxic agents, smoking, age, hypomagnesemia and hypoalbuminemia 5. In addition, genetic variations in genes involved in the pharmacological pathway of cisplatin may affect response and toxicity. In particular, polymorphism in genes involved in cisplatin cellular uptake such as the organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2); metabolism, i.e. glutathione S‐transferases 1 (GST1); DNA repair, like the excision repair cross‐complementation groups (ERCC1, ERCC2); and other pharmacodynamic candidate genes such as catechol‐O‐methyltransferase (COMT), have shown to be associated with nephrotoxicity 6, 7, 8, 9. Although cisplatin toxicity is in most cases largely reversible, this report describes a young patient with persistent severe nephropathy after three doses of low‐dose cisplatin therapy.

A 27‐year‐old Caucasian woman was referred to our hospital with vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain. The patient had no further medical history besides an asymptomatic pelvic kidney and no history of smoking or intake of any nephrotoxic agent. She was diagnosed with bulky FIGO stage IIIb squamous cell cervix carcinoma with pelvic and presacral lymph nodes with right‐sided hydro‐nephrosis. Renal function improved after double J ureteral stent placement (serum creatinine level 87 μmol l−1). Treatment was started with induction chemotherapy consisting of three cycles carboplatin (with a target area under the curve (AUC) of five) plus paclitaxel (175 mg m−2) once every 3 weeks. The second and third cycle of carboplatin/paclitaxel were both postponed for 1 week due to haematological toxicity with stable creatinine clearance.

Radiologic evaluation after three cycles showed partial response of the primary tumour and lymph nodes remained stable. One month after the last cycle of carboplatin/paclitaxel, chemoradiation was initiated. Definitive chemoradiotherapy comprised weekly intravenous administration of cisplatin 40 mg m−2 and 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy radiotherapy besides 3 * 8 Gy brachytherapy in weeks five, six and seven. After three cycles of cisplatin, serum creatinine level increased to 147 μmol l−1 and platelets decreased to 40 * 109 l−1. Cisplatin therapy was discontinued but both radiation and brachytherapy were continued. At day 31, the patient was hospitalized for 16 days because of further deterioration of kidney function (AKI grade 3, creatinine 432 μmol l−1) and progressive pancytopenia (leukocytes 1.7 * 109 l−1, neutrophils 0.84 * 109 l−1, haemoglobin 4.9 mmol l−1, platelets 21 * 109 l−1) (Figure 1). In addition, hypoalbuminaemia (30 g l−1) and hypomagnesaemia (0.66 mmol l−1) were noted. At time of hospital discharge, the patient's serum creatinine level was still 228 μmol l−1. Six months later, no improvement of renal function had occurred – the serum creatinine levels remained above 200 μmol l−1 (AKI grade 2) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Serum creatinine levels and platelet counts in the peripheral blood of the patient after cisplatin therapy. Time is measured in days after the start of the chemotherapy, which is day 0. Stars indicate administration of cisplatin 40 mg m−2 on day 0, 7 and 14

In order to elucidate potential causes of the observed irreversible nephropathy, a pharmacogenomic analysis was performed, for which informed consent for genotyping and publication as case report was obtained from the patient. Polymorphisms in five candidate genes (COMT, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, OCT2) were determined by PCR (Taqman assay). The tested polymorphisms in ERCC1 (c.197G>T (rs3212986)), ERCC2 (c.934C>T (rs1799793)), GSPT1 (313A>G (rs1695)) and OCT2 (c.808G>T (rs316019)) proved to be wild‐type. Interestingly, however, both tested polymorphisms in COMT proved to be homozygously polymorphic (COMT c.615 + 310C>T (rs4646316) and c.616‐367C>T (rs9332377)). Of note, both polymorphisms have previously been associated with cisplatin‐induced ototoxicity 10, 11. The COMT enzyme is dependent on the S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM) methyl donor substrate in the methionine pathway and involved in the inactivation of catecholamine neurotransmitters. Despite the fact that its precise function with regard to hearing loss of cisplatin has not yet fully been unravelled, a putative mechanism for cisplatin toxicity could be mediated through increased levels of SAM as result of reduced COMT activity. In a recent mice model study, administration of both SAM and cisplatin increased cisplatin toxicity by 3–6.2‐fold compared to cisplatin alone, as monitored by renal dysfunction 12. Furthermore, whether COMT polymorphisms are also associated with nephrotoxicity of cisplatin in humans has thus far not yet been studied. We prudentially hypothesize that based on the known association of COMT polymorphism with ototoxicity, plus the observed homozygosity of both polymorphisms in this young patient that led to reduced COMT activity, this may have contributed to the irreversible and severe kidney damage. With minor allele frequencies of the COMT polymorphisms of 16% and 24%, respectively 11, it would be interesting to explore the effect of these polymorphisms on cisplatin‐induced nephrotoxicity in a COMT KO mice model and in an appropriate patient population.

Besides a potential genetic susceptibility, several other risk factors may have additionally contributed to kidney damage in this young woman. Cisplatin has a high plasma protein binding of more than 90%; malnutrition and hypoalbuminaemia may consequently result in a higher fraction of unbound cisplatin, with a potentially increased risk of toxicity. Hypomagnesaemia was noted, which is also associated with nephrotoxicity 13. It is not likely that the existing hydronephrosis, for which a double J stent was placed successfully, contributed to kidney failure. Since pelvic kidney‐sparing radiotherapy was performed, radiation damage is not likely. Besides, no other concomitant nephrotoxic drugs were used.

In summary, homozygosity of two COMT polymorphisms (c.615 + 310C>T and c.616–367C>T) was demonstrated in a patient with persisting nephrotoxicity after three low doses of cisplatin. Besides additional risk factors, including hypomagnesaemia and hypoalbuminaemia, COMT polymorphisms may have contributed to the severe kidney damage. Based on the known association of COMT polymorphism with cisplatin‐induced ototoxicity, association analysis with nephrotoxicity should be the subject of further investigation.

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests to declare.

de Jong, C. , Sanders, S. , Creemers, G.‐J. , Burylo, A. M. , Taks, M. , Schellens, J. H. M. , and Deenen, M. J. (2017) Pharmacogenetic analysis of irreversible severe cisplatin‐induced nephropathy: a case report of a 27‐year‐old woman. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 83: 2120–2122. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13309.

References

  • 1. Southan C, Sharman JL, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Alexander SP, et al. The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2016: towards curated quantitative interactions between 1300 protein targets and 6000 ligands. Nucl Acids Res 2016; 44: D1054–D1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Alexander SPH, Fabbro D, Kelly E, Marrion N, Peters JA, Benson HE, et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: Enzymes. Br J Pharmacol 2015; 172: 6024–6109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Miller RP, Tadagavadi RK, Ramesh G, Reeves WB. Mechanisms of cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Toxins (Basel) 2010; 2: 2490–2518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Yao X, Panichpisal K, Kurtzman N, Nugent K. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity: a review. Am J Med Sci 2007; 334: 115–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Arrieta O, Michel Ortega RM, Villanueva‐Rodriguez G, Serna‐Thomé MG, Flores‐Estrada D, Diaz‐Romero C, et al. Association of nutritional status and serum albumin levels with development of toxicity in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel‐cisplatin chemotherapy: a prospective study. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Khrunin AV, Moisseev A, Gorbunova V, Limborska S. Genetic polymorphisms and the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin‐based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics J 2010; 10: 54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Liu HE, Bai KJ, Hsieh YC, Yu MC, Lee CN, Chang JH, et al. Multiple analytical approaches demonstrate a complex relationship of genetic and nongenetic factors with cisplatin‐ and carboplatin‐induced nephrotoxicity in lung cancer patients. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 937429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Sullivan I, Salazar J, Majem M, Pallarés C, Del Rio E, Páez D, et al. Pharmacogenetics of the DNA repair pathways in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy. Cancer Lett 2014; 353: 160–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lu C, Spitz MR, Zhao H, Dong Q, Truong M, Chang JY, et al. Association between glutathione S‐transferase pi polymorphisms and survival in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2006; 106: 441–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ross CJ, Katzov‐Eckert H, Dubé MP, Brooks B, Rassekh SR, Barhdadi A, et al. Genetic variants in TPMT and COMT are associated with hearing loss in children receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 1345–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hagleitner MM, Coenen MJ, Patino‐Garcia A, de Bont ES, Gonzalez‐Neira A, Vos HI, et al. Influence of genetic variants in TPMT and COMT associated with cisplatin induced hearing loss in patients with cancer: two new cohorts and a meta‐analysis reveal significant heterogeneity between cohorts. PLoS One 2014; 9: e115869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ochoa B, Bobadilla N, Arrellin G, Herrera LA. S‐Adenosyl‐L‐methionine increases serum BUN and creatinine in cisplatin‐treated mice. Arch Med Res 2009; 40: 54–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kidera Y, Kawakami H, Sakiyama T, Okamoto K, Tanaka K, Takeda M, et al. Risk factors for cisplatin‐induced nephrotoxicity and potential of magnesium supplementation for renal protection. PLoS One 2014; 9: e101902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES