Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;120(5):782–785. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.007

Usefulness of Atrial Premature Complexes on Routine Electrocardiogram to Determine the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation (From the REGARDS Study)

Wesley T O’Neal 1, Hooman Kamel 2, Suzanne E Judd 3, Monika M Safford 4, Viola Vaccarino 1,5, Virginia J Howard 6, George Howard 3, Elsayed Z Soliman 7,8
PMCID: PMC5557661  NIHMSID: NIHMS885315  PMID: 28705381

Abstract

Atrial premature complexes (APCs) serve as acute triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is currently unknown whether the association between APCs and AF varies by race or sex. We examined the association between APCs and AF in 13,840 (mean age=63±8.4 years; 56% women; 37% black) participants from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study. APCs were detected on baseline electrocardiograms (2003–2007). Incident AF was identified by study-scheduled electrocardiograms and self-reported history at a follow-up examination. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between APCs and incident AF. A total of 950 (6.9%) participants had APCs at the baseline visit. After a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 1,015 (7.3%) incident AF cases were detected. APCs were associated with an increased risk of AF (OR=1.92, 95%CI=1.57, 2.35). The relationship between APCs and AF did not vary by race (interaction p-value=0.56) or sex (interaction p-value=0.66). In conclusion, APCs detected on a routine electrocardiogram are associated with an increased risk for AF development, and this association does not vary by race or sex. The findings of this analysis suggest that the AF risk associated with atrial ectopy does not account for the differential risk of AF that is observed in whites compared with blacks, and in men compared with women.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation, atrial ectopy, epidemiology

INTRODUCTION

Atrial premature complexes (APCs) serve as acute triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF).1 This is supported by several reports that have linked APCs with AF development.24 However, it is currently unknown whether the association between APCs and AF varies by race or sex. Blacks have a lower prevalence of AF compared with their white counterparts,58 and it has been suggested that a differential risk factor profile exists between races.9,10 Similarly, women are less likely to develop AF compared with men.5,11 An examination of the AF risk associated with APCs may provide insight into why these race and sex differences exist in AF susceptibility. Possibly, whites and men are more susceptible to acute triggers, such as APCs, implicating atrial remodeling as a more important AF risk factor in blacks and women. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine if race and sex differences exist in the association between APCs and incident AF in the REasons for Geographic And Ethnic Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a large racially diverse prospective cohort study of men and women.

METHODS

Details of REGARDS have been published previously.12 Briefly, REGARDS is a prospective cohort study designed to identify causes of regional and black-white disparities in stroke mortality. The study oversampled blacks and persons residing in the Stroke Belt (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Louisiana) between January 2003 and October 2007. A total of 30,239 participants aged 45 years and older were recruited through a commercially available list of residents using postal mailings and telephone data. Demographic information and medical histories were obtained using a computer-assisted telephone interview that was conducted by trained interviewers. Additionally, a brief in-home physical examination was performed 3 to 4 weeks after the telephone interview. During the in-home visit, trained staff collected information regarding medications, blood and urine samples, and a resting electrocardiogram (ECG).

Approximately 10 years after the baseline assessment, 15,517 REGARDS participants completed a follow-up examination similar to the baseline visit, including a resting 12-lead ECG. Participants were excluded if they had baseline AF (n=1,048) or if baseline covariates were missing (n=629), resulting in a final sample of 13,840. All participants provided written informed consent and the study was approved by all participating institutional review boards.

APCs were detected on the baseline 12-lead ECG and defined by Minnesota code criteria (Minnesota codes 8.1.1, 8.1.3).13 APCs were classified as present or absent. All ECGs were centrally read at the Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center (Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA) by readers who were blinded to study outcomes.

Incident AF was identified during follow-up by a study-scheduled ECG and also from self-reported medical history of a physician diagnosis during the computer-assisted telephone interview. Self-reported AF was defined as an affirmative response to the following question: “Has a physician or a health professional ever told you that you had atrial fibrillation?”, a question that has been shown to be a reliable predictor of incident stroke events.14

Age, sex, race, household income, and smoking status were self-reported. Income was dichotomized at $20,000. Smoking was coded as ever (e.g., current and former) or never smoker. Fasting blood samples were obtained and assayed for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and serum glucose. Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL (or a non-fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL among those failing to fast) or self-reported diabetes medication use. The current use of aspirin and antihypertensive medications was self-reported. After the participant rested for 5 minutes in a seated position, blood pressure was measured using a sphygmomanometer. Two values were obtained following a standardized protocol and averaged. Using baseline ECG data, left ventricular hypertrophy was defined by the Sokolow-Lyon Criteria.15 Coronary heart disease was ascertained by self-reported history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary angioplasty or stenting, or if evidence of prior myocardial infarction was present on the baseline ECG. Prior stroke was ascertained by participant self-reported history. Cardiovascular disease was defined as the composite of coronary heart disease and stroke.

Baseline characteristics were compared between those with and without APCs. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage while continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance for categorical variables was tested using the chi-square method and the student’s t-test for continuous variables. Since the exact date of AF onset was unknown, odds ratios (OR) as the measure of association were computed using unconditional logistic regression to examine the association between APCs and AF. Normal theory approximation was used to determine the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the OR estimates (hereafter called ‘risk’). Multivariable models included the following covariates: Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race, education, income, and geographic region; Model 2 included covariates in Model 1 with the addition of systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, antihypertensive medications, left ventricular hypertrophy, and prior cardiovascular disease. We evaluated for effect modification by race and sex, using a stratification technique and comparing models with and without interaction terms. The Wald type test used to determine statistical significance for interaction effects. Statistical significance for all comparisons including interactions was defined as p <0.05. SAS® Version 9.4 (Cary, NC) was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 13,840 (mean age=63±8.4 years; 56% women; 37% black) participants were included in the final analytical sample. A total of 950 (6.9%) participants had evidence of APCs on the baseline ECG. Baseline characteristics stratified by the presence of APCs are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics (N=13,840)

Characteristic APCs
P-value*
Yes (n=950) No (n=12,890)
Age, mean ± SD (years) 67 ± 8.9 63 ± 8.4 <0.001
Men 479 (50%) 5,585 (43%) <0.001
Black 387 (41%) 4,736 (37%) 0.014
Region
 Stroke belt 295 (31%) 4,375 (34%)
 Stroke buckle 215 (23%) 2,753 (21%)
 Non-belt 440 (46%) 5,762 (45%) 0.19
Education (high school or less) 332 (35%) 4,031 (31%) 0.019
Ever smoker 495 (52%) 6,528 (51%) 0.38
Income (<$20,000) 131 (14%) 1,615 (13%) 0.26
Diabetes mellitus 183 (19%) 2,102 (16%) 0.018
Systolic blood pressure, mean ± SD (mm Hg) 128 ± 16 126 ± 16 <0.001
Body mass index, mean ± SD (kg/m2) 29 ± 6.3 29 ± 5.9 0.92
Total cholesterol, mean ± SD (mg/dL) 189 ± 38 193 ± 39 0.0010
HDL cholesterol, mean ± SD (mg/dL) 52 ± 16 53 ±16 0.37
Aspirin 434 (46%) 5,345 (41%) 0.011
Antihypertensive medications 494 (52%) 5,961 (46%) <0.001
Left ventricular hypertrophy 99 (10%) 1,039 (8%) 0.011
Cardiovascular disease 165 (17%) 1,891 (15%) 0.024
*

Statistical significance for categorical variables tested using the chi-square method and for continuous variables the student’s t-test was used.

APC=atrial premature complex; HDL=high-density lipoprotein; SD=standard deviation.

After a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 1,015 (7.3%; 43% women; 22% black) AF cases were detected. Of these, 227 (22%) were detected on the ECG and 788 (28%) were self-reported. AF was more frequent in those with baseline APCs (n=139, 15%) compared with participants who did not have APCs (n=876, 6.8%; p<0.001). An increased risk of AF was observed for participants who had baseline APCs (OR=1.92, 95%CI=1.57, 2.35) (Table 2). This relationship did not vary by race (whites: OR=1.98, 95%CI=1.57, 2.50; blacks: OR=1.78, 95%CI=1.19, 2.67; interaction p-value=0.56) or sex (women: OR=1.95, 95%CI=1.42, 2.68; men: OR=1.93, 95%CI=1.49, 2.51; interaction p-value=0.66) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk for Atrial Fibrillation (N=13,840)

Events/No. At Risk Model 1*
OR (95%CI)
P-value Model 2
OR (95%CI)
P-value P-interaction
APC
 No 876/12,890 Ref - Ref - -
 Yes 139/950 1.94 (1.58, 2.36) <0.001 1.92 (1.57, 2.35) <0.001
Race
 Black 221/5,123 1.84 (1.23, 2.74) 0.0027 1.78 (1.19, 2.67) 0.0051 0.56
 White 794/8,717 1.98 (1.57, 2.50) <0.001 1.98 (1.57, 2.50) <0.001
Sex
 Female 436/7,776 1.91 (1.39, 2.61) <0.001 1.95 (1.42, 2.68) <0.001 0.66
 Male 579/6,064 1.99 (1.54, 2.58) <0.001 1.93 (1.49, 2.51) <0.001
*

Adjusted for age, sex, race, education, income, and geographic region.

Adjusted for Model 1 covariates plus systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, antihypertensive medications, left ventricular hypertrophy, and prior cardiovascular disease.

Interactions tested using Model 2.

APC=atrial premature complex; CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio.

DISCUSSION

In this analysis from REGARDS, APCs detected on a routine 12-lead ECG were associated with an increased risk of AF. The results were consistent in subgroups stratified by race and sex. Overall, the findings of this analysis suggest that the AF risk associated with atrial ectopy does not account for the differential risk of AF that is observed in whites compared with blacks, and in men compared with women.

Several reports have examined the association of APCs with AF. An examination of 42,751 patients (90% men; 94% whites) from the Palo Alto Veterans Health Care System demonstrated that APCs automatically detected on 12-lead ECGs are predictive of incident AF.2 A report of 428 patients who underwent elective 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring also has shown that frequent atrial ectopic beats (>100 APCs/day) increases one’s risk for AF development.3 Additionally, a study of 1,260 participants (95% whites) from the Cardiovascular Health Study who underwent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring demonstrated that the risk of AF increases with APC count.4

The aforementioned studies clearly demonstrated that APCs, whether detected on the 12-lead ECG,2 or 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring,3,4 are associated with an increased risk for AF. However, these reports were limited regarding their inclusion of black participants and women. The findings of the current analysis support this conclusion and provide another example of the value of the resting ECG to identify individuals who are likely to develop AF. Additionally, due to the diverse population of REGARDS, we were able to determine if the AF risk associated with atrial ectopy varied by race or sex. Overall, prior reports and the findings of the current analysis suggest that APCs identify at-risk individuals in whom intense risk factor modification strategies are warranted to prevent AF occurrence.16 This is further supported due to the fact that participants with APCs were more likely to have well-known risk factors for AF (e.g., cardiovascular disease).

The current analysis provides important information regarding the risk of AF associated with atrial ectopy. Numerous reports have demonstrated that an increased risk of AF exists for whites compared with blacks,58 and for men compared with women.5,11 Explanations for these differences have been proposed, and suggest that a differential impact of AF risk factors exists by race,9,10 and sex.17,18 Other explanations are related to differences in anatomical and electrophysiological properties, suggesting that the necessary substrate for AF propagation is less likely to develop in blacks compared with whites, and in women compared with men. This is supported by studies which have demonstrated that smaller left atrial diameters exist in blacks compared with whites, 19 and in women compared with men.20 Similar findings have been reported for ECG phenotypes of AF.21 Lastly, it is possible that differences in sex hormones explain the differential risk of AF between men and women,22 and further studies are needed to explore this hypothesis.

Although these prior reports have demonstrated that adverse atrial remodeling varies by race and sex, the results of this study suggest that the risk of AF associated with APCs, a trigger for AF,1 does not vary by race or sex. This implies that the race and sex differences in AF susceptibility probably are more related to variation in atrial remodeling than susceptibility to atrial ectopy. Therefore, a better characterization of risk factors for adverse atrial remodeling is needed to understand differences in AF susceptibility by race and sex.

The findings of the current analysis should be interpreted in the context of certain limitations. Our analysis was subjected to recall bias, as several baseline characteristics were self-reported. APCs were detected on a single ECG recording, and it is possible that more APCs would have been detected with longer electrocardiographic monitoring. However, the detection of more APCs would have merely strengthened our effect estimates, rather than reducing the observed association toward the null. AF events also were ascertained nearly 10 years after the initial ECG tracing, and this outcome was subjected to recall bias, as some of the cases were ascertained by self-reported history of a physician diagnosis. Similarly, in most patients, AF is paroxysmal, and certain events possibly were missed on the follow-up ECG tracing. It is likely that more cases would be detected with ambulatory ECG monitoring. Nonetheless, the significant association between APCs on the ECG and AF suggests that this method of APC ascertainment was sufficient to assess AF risk. Furthermore, we adjusted for several AF risk factors but acknowledge that other unmeasured factors possibly influenced our results.

Acknowledgments

FUNDING

This research project is supported by a cooperative agreement U01NS041588 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and MMS received support from K24111154 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Service. WTO is supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F32HL134290. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke or the National Institutes of Health.

The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the REGARDS study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating REGARDS investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.regardsstudy.org.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Iwasaki YK, Nishida K, Kato T, Nattel S. Atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: implications for management. Circulation. 2011;124:2264–2274. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.019893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perez MV, Dewey FE, Marcus R, Ashley EA, Al-Ahmad AA, Wang PJ, Froelicher VF. Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2009;158:622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chong BH, Pong V, Lam KF, Liu S, Zuo ML, Lau YF, Lau CP, Tse HF, Siu CW. Frequent premature atrial complexes predict new occurrence of atrial fibrillation and adverse cardiovascular events. Europace. 2012;14:942–947. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dewland TA, Vittinghoff E, Mandyam MC, Heckbert SR, Siscovick DS, Stein PK, Psaty BM, Sotoodehnia N, Gottdiener JS, Marcus GM. Atrial ectopy as a predictor of incident atrial fibrillation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:721–728. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-11-201312030-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001;285:2370–2375. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Psaty BM, Manolio TA, Kuller LH, Kronmal RA, Cushman M, Fried LP, White R, Furberg CD, Rautaharju PM. Incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults. Circulation. 1997;96:2455–2461. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.7.2455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alonso A, Agarwal SK, Soliman EZ, Ambrose M, Chamberlain AM, Prineas RJ, Folsom AR. Incidence of atrial fibrillation in whites and African-Americans: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am Heart J. 2009;158:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dewland TA, Olgin JE, Vittinghoff E, Marcus GM. Incident atrial fibrillation among Asians, Hispanics, blacks, and whites. Circulation. 2013;128:2470–2477. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lipworth L, Okafor H, Mumma MT, Edwards TL, Roden DM, Blot WJ, Darbar D. Race-specific impact of atrial fibrillation risk factors in blacks and whites in the southern community cohort study. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1637–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jensen PN, Thacker EL, Dublin S, Psaty BM, Heckbert SR. Racial differences in the incidence of and risk factors for atrial fibrillation in older adults: the cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:276–280. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH, Jr, Zheng ZJ, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJ. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Howard VJ, Cushman M, Pulley L, Gomez CR, Go RC, Prineas RJ, Graham A, Moy CS, Howard G. The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25:135–143. doi: 10.1159/000086678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Prineas RJ, Crow RS, Zhang ZM. The Minnesota code manual of electrocardiographic findings: standards and procedures for measurement and classification. London: Springer; 2010. p. xiii.p. 328. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soliman EZ, Howard G, Meschia JF, Cushman M, Muntner P, Pullicino PM, McClure LA, Judd S, Howard VJ. Self-reported atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Stroke. 2011;42:2950–2953. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.621367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sokolow M, Lyon TP. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J. 1949;37:161–186. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(49)90562-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gorenek B, Pelliccia A, Benjamin EJ, Boriani G, Crijns HJ, Fogel RI, Van Gelder IC, Halle M, Kudaiberdieva G, Lane DA, Bjerregaard Larsen T, Lip GY, Lochen ML, Marin F, Niebauer J, Sanders P, Tokgozoglu L, Vos MA, Van Wagoner DR, Fauchier L, Savelieva I, Goette A, Agewall S, Chiang CE, Figueiredo M, Stiles M, Dickfeld T, Patton K, Piepoli M, Corra U, Manuel Marques-Vidal P, Faggiano P, Schmid JP, Abreu A Document r. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR) position paper on how to prevent atrial fibrillation endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24:4–40. doi: 10.1177/2047487316676037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schnabel RB, Yin X, Gona P, Larson MG, Beiser AS, McManus DD, Newton-Cheh C, Lubitz SA, Magnani JW, Ellinor PT, Seshadri S, Wolf PA, Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386:154–162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61774-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ko D, Rahman F, Schnabel RB, Yin X, Benjamin EJ, Christophersen IE. Atrial fibrillation in women: epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and prognosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:321–332. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marcus GM, Olgin JE, Whooley M, Vittinghoff E, Stone KL, Mehra R, Hulley SB, Schiller NB. Racial differences in atrial fibrillation prevalence and left atrial size. Am J Med. 2010;123:375 e371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McManus DD, Xanthakis V, Sullivan LM, Zachariah J, Aragam J, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Vasan RS. Longitudinal tracking of left atrial diameter over the adult life course: Clinical correlates in the community. Circulation. 2010;121:667–674. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.885806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.O’Neal WT, Zhang ZM, Loehr LR, Chen LY, Alonso A, Soliman EZ. Electrocardiographic Advanced Interatrial Block and Atrial Fibrillation Risk in the General Population. Am J Cardiol. 2016;117:1755–1759. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Magnani JW, Moser CB, Murabito JM, Sullivan LM, Wang N, Ellinor PT, Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ, Coviello AD. Association of sex hormones, aging, and atrial fibrillation in men: the Framingham Heart Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:307–312. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES