Abstract
Application of nanomaterials for agriculture is relatively new as compared to their use in biomedical and industrial sectors. In order to promote sustainable nanoagriculture, biocompatible silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have been synthesized through green route using kaffir lime leaf extract for use as nanopriming agent for enhancing seed germination of rice aged seeds. Results of various characterization techniques showed the successful formation of AgNPs which were capped with phytochemicals present in the plant extract. Rice aged seeds primed with phytosynthesized AgNPs at 5 and 10 ppm significantly improved germination performance and seedling vigor compared to unprimed control, AgNO3 priming, and conventional hydropriming. Nanopriming could enhance α-amylase activity, resulting in higher soluble sugar content for supporting seedlings growth. Furthermore, nanopriming stimulated the up-regulation of aquaporin genes in germinating seeds. Meanwhile, more ROS production was observed in germinating seeds of nanopriming treatment compared to unprimed control and other priming treatments, suggesting that both ROS and aquaporins play important roles in enhancing seed germination. Different mechanisms underlying nanopriming-induced seed germination were proposed, including creation of nanopores for enhanced water uptake, rebooting ROS/antioxidant systems in seeds, generation of hydroxyl radicals for cell wall loosening, and nanocatalyst for fastening starch hydrolysis.
Introduction
Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize the agriculture and play an important role in food and crop production1, 2. During the past decade, a number of patents and products incorporating engineered nanoparticles (NPs) into agricultural practices, e.g. nanopesticides, nanofertilizers, and nanosensors, have been developed with the collective goal to promote the efficiency and sustainability of agricultural practices requiring less input and generating less waste than conventional products and approaches2, 3. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are the most commercialized nanomaterials widely used in antimicrobial and personal care products, building materials, water filtration, medical instruments, and in many other industrial and biomedical applications4. Since applications of NPs in agriculture need to be economical, ecofriendly, biocompatible and non-toxic3, 5, synthesis of bioengineered NPs for agricultural purpose should be compatible with these requisites. Plant based materials seem to be the best candidates for synthesizing biocompatible NPs due to their biochemical diversity of plant extract, non-toxic phytochemical constitutes, non-pathogenicity, low cost and flexibility in reaction parameters as compared to chemical synthesis methods5, 6.
In commercial agriculture, rapid and uniform seed germination and seedling emergence are important determinants of successful stand establishment7, 8. Germination begins with water uptake by the mature dry seed (imbibition) and terminates with the elongation of the embryonic axis, usually the radicle, through the seed envelope, which has as a consequence, the protrusion of the root, and later of the shoot7. The α-amylase is one of the key enzymes involved in degradation of starch during germination of cereal seeds and in subsequent seedling establishment9. This is the only enzyme which initiates hydrolysis of native starch granules and is de novo synthesized during the germination of cereal seeds and catalyzes the hydrolysis of α-1, 4 linked glucose polymers to release fragments that can be further broken down by other amylolytic enzymes10. Thus, the enhancement of α-amylase during seed germination is of interest in the field of carbohydrate research to promote economic plant growth.
All seeds stored under air dry conditions will have suffered a degree of deterioration11 and seeds in long-term storage will eventually lose their viability due to spontaneous biochemical damage occurring at cellular level12, leading to natural seed aging and subsequently limiting crop productivity. Seed priming is a technique that partially hydrates seeds in natural or synthetic compounds under specific environment to a point where germination-related metabolic processes begin, but radicle emergence does not occur13. Seed priming has been found to be useful for enhancing seed quality, seedling establishment and crop yields as well as increasing tolerance to environmental stresses8, 13. Seed priming can improve the germination of weak, damaged or aged seeds11 or even under adverse environment13. A number of commonly used priming agents include polyethelyne glycol, inorganic salts, nutrients, and plain water12, 14, 15. However, different priming solutions have different properties, effectiveness, and optimization of priming agents is required for each crop species14. Therefore, there is a growing need to develop new priming agents to enhance seed germination of various crop plants.
In recent years, several metal-based NPs (e.g., AgNPs16, AuNPs5, CuNPs17,18, FeNPs17, FeS2NPs19, TiO2NPs20, ZnNPs17,18, ZnONPs21) and carbon-based NPs (e.g., fullerene22 and carbon nanotubes23) have been applied as seed pre-treatment agents for promoting seed germination, seedling growth, and stress tolerance in some crop plants. Among these studies, only a few researchers have used seed priming strategy, in which seeds must be re-dried to their original moisture content before sowing. Thus, the mechanism behind seed nanopriming would be different from that of pre-sowing seed treatment without drying seeds. In addition, comprehensive studies on physiological and molecular mechanism of nanopriming effects on seed germination have not been elucidated, and thus there are many questions remained to be addressed, especially mechanism behind NPs-induced seed germination.
In this study, jasmine rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML 105) was selected as a model plant since this cultivar is one of the world’s best quality aromatic rice cultivars which is in high demand for world’s markets, but it is sensitive to various environmental stresses, resulting in the reduction of yield24. Moreover, many seed lots of jasmine rice are naturally aged seeds due to improper storage conditions under ambient temperatures by most farmers. Therefore, the overarching aims of this study are to develop green method for the synthesis of AgNPs and present a new priming technique using phytosynthesized AgNPs to enhance the germination and starch metabolic process of rice aged seeds alternative to conventional priming. The mechanism behind AgNPs induced seed germination and starch mobilization was also proposed.
Results
Synthesis and characterization of phytosynthesized AgNPs
In the present study, the color of kaffir lime leaf extract changed from pale yellow to dark brown after exposure with AgNO3 solution for about 1 h at room temperature, indicating reduction of Ag + to Ag0 (Inset of Fig. S1 in Supporting information). The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of AgNPs showed a peak centered near 443 nm at UV-vis spectra (Fig. S1), confirming the reduction of silver ions to colloidal silver.
TEM image (Fig. 1a) of the AgNPs sample shows nanoparticles exhibiting a typical spherical and an ellipsoidal morphology. The approximate particle diameter was found to be in the range of 6–36 nm. EDX analysis also confirmed the presence of elemental silver signal of the synthesized AgNPs (Fig. S2, see Supporting information). The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern in Fig. 1b showed the bright circular rings, suggesting the crystalline nature of AgNPs. The diffraction rings of the AgNPs exhibited Debye-Scherrer rings assigned (111), (200), (220), and (311) lattice planes of the face centered cubic (fcc) silver, respectively, which is consistent with XRD result (Table S1 in Supporting information).
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was also used to confirm the crystalline nature of synthesized AgNPs. Figure 1c displays four prominent diffraction peaks at 2θ value of 38.2°, 44.3°, 64.6° and 77.4° indexed as (111), (200), (220) and (311) miller indices, respectively (Table S1), which are characteristic of fcc crystalline structure of metallic silver (JCPDS file No.04–0783)25. The unassigned peaks marked with asterisks were also observed, suggesting that the crystallization of bioorganic phase occurred on the surface of the nanoparticles. The average nanocrystalline size of synthesized AgNPs is calculated by Debye-Scherrer’s equation25 was found to be around 11.2 nm with respect to high intense peak (111) as shown in Table S1.
FTIR analysis was conducted to identify the surface structure of the AgNPs and identify the possible functional groups (phytomolecules) of the plant extracts involved in the synthesis and stabilization of the AgNPs. In FTIR of kaffir lime leaf extracts (Fig. 2b), a number of peaks reflecting a complex nature of plant metabolites were recorded: for example, 3323 cm−1 (stretching vibrations of the hydroxyl (–OH) groups of alcohol and phenolic compounds)26–28, 2922 cm−1 (stretching vibrations of secondary amines in the N–H bond)26, 29, 30, 1614 cm−1 (amide I band arising due to carbonyl (–C=O) stretch of the proteins)29, 31, 1241 cm−1 (amide III band of protein)29, 30, and 1020 (C–N stretching vibration of aliphatic amines or to alcohols or phenols)29. By comparing the FTIR spectra of the plant extract and synthesized AgNPs, the band shift and intensity decrease of the hydroxyl, carbonyl and amine groups was observed (Fig. 2a), indicating that the major phytochemicals from the extract were involved in reduction and stabilization processes and coated on the AgNPs surface.
Ag+ ion release in priming solution
To determine bioavailability and Ag+ ion release in AgNPs and AgNO3 priming solutions, we measured Ag+ concentration in the priming solutions at 1 h and 24 h after dissolution using ICP-OES technique. At 1 h, the release of Ag+ ions in both concentrations of AgNO3 priming solutions (10 and 20 mgL−1) was significantly higher than those of AgNPs priming solutions (Table S2), suggesting the rapid release of Ag+ ions in AgNO3. At 24 h of dissolution, Ag+ ion release in both AgNO310 and AgNO320 drastically increased with concentration change of about 1.12–6.7 times compared to their respective solutions at 1 h of dissolution. In contrast, Ag+ ion release in both AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 solution slowly increased with concentration change of about 1.2–1.5 times compared to their respective solution at 1 h of dissolution. At 24 h, the Ag+ concentrations in AgNO310 and AgNO320 solutions were 12.7–21.6 and 25.5–43.5 times higher than AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 priming solution, respectively. No Ag+ concentration was observed from deionized water used as hydropriming solution.
AgNPs could mediate hydroxyl radicals as determined by Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) analysis
Hydroxyl radical (•OH) generation in the priming solution was analyzed using ESR, which is the most accurate and sensitive technique for the detection of free radicals. The spin trap DMPO, which reacts covalently with •OH, gives rise to stable secondary radical adduct that can be detected at room temperature using ESR. A four line spectrum with a 1:2:2: intensity ratio is of indicative of the formation of DMPO-OH spin adduct. ESR analysis indicated that AgNPs were able to generate •OH compared with standard Fenton reaction (Fig. 3). In contrast, deionized water and AgNO3 did not produce ESR signal under the same conditions, indicating that Ag+ did not produce •OH.
Acceleration of seed germination and seedling growth by nanopriming
As shown in Fig. 4a, priming the rice seeds with nanopriming solutions (AgNPs10 and AgNPs20) could accelerate the early seed germination and germination percentage compared to those of the unprimed and other primed groups (p < 0.05). For example, while the control seeds germinated on the fourth day after incubation, 16.6% of both nanoprimed seeds were able to germinate during the second day after incubation (p < 0.05). Moreover, both nanoprimed seeds had reached 93% of germination on the fourth day after incubation. A significant increase of seed germination was observed for nanoprimed seeds on the third day. At this time, the germination percentage for seeds that were primed with AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 averaged 73.3% and 93.3%, respectively, while seed germination percentage of the hydropriming, AgNO310 and AgNO320 treatments averaged 46.6, 30.0 and 33.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). The germination percentage of nanoprimed seeds was significantly higher than that of both groups of AgNO3-primed seeds, but was not significantly different from hydropriming group (Table 1).
Table 1.
Treatment | Germination (%) | Germination index | Germination rate | Vigor Index | Seed water uptake (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 h | 24 h | |||||
UP | 83.3bc | 3.8d | 1.8d | 207.7c | 9.1c | 14.8c |
HP | 93.3ab | 7.0b | 2.7b | 484.7b | 13.2b | 17.7b |
AgNO310 | 83.3bc | 5.4c | 2.2c | 267.8c | 10.3c | 15.4c |
AgNO320 | 80.0c | 5.6c | 2.2c | 258.0c | 10.1c | 15.1c |
AgNPs10 | 93.3ab | 9.0a | 3.2a | 600.5a | 15.6a | 19.1a |
AgNPs20 | 96.6ab | 9.9a | 3.5a | 631.0a | 16.6a | 19.3a |
In addition, the germination index (GI) and germination rate (GR) of the tested seeds were also calculated, and it was found that nanopriming treatment greatly increased GI and GR values compared to those of unprimed and other primed seeds (Table 1). The phenotypic characteristics of the rice seedlings developed from all nanoprimed seeds are normal without the sign of toxicity (Fig. 4b). After 6 days of germination, nanopriming significantly increased vigor index compared to unprimed control and other priming treatment (Table 1). Also, priming with nanosolution significantly increased the lengths of roots and shoots and seedling biomass (mg weight) compared to the unprimed and other primed groups (p < 0.05) (Fig. S3a–d). Overall, priming the aged seeds of jasmine rice with phytosynthesized AgNPs at optimum doses (10 and 20 mgL−1) increased seed germination, vigor strength and seedling growth.
Seed water uptake
To test whether different priming agents can affect seed imbibition at the early germination process, seed water uptake at 4 and 24 h of imbibition was determined. It was found that all primed seeds adsorbed water faster than those unprimed at the initial (4 h) and later (24 h) periods of imbibitions (p < 0.05) (Table 1). Nanoprimed seeds (both AgNPs10 and AgNPs20) imbibed water faster than other primed groups at the very beginning (4 h) of imbibition (p < 0.05). At 24 h, seed water uptake of nanopriming treatment was still higher than hydropriming and AgNO3 priming treatments.
Internalization of Ag in rice seeds
Internalization and accumulation of silver (Ag) of primed seeds were analyzed by ICP-OES. As shown in Table S3, no Ag was detected in unprimed and hydroprimed seeds (detection limit of Ag analysis by ICP-OES is 0.001 ppm), indicating that the Ag element is not present in rice seeds. On the contrary, both groups of seeds treated with AgNO3 or AgNPs priming solutions showed the accumulation of Ag, albeit very low concentration. This implied that Ag+ ions released from AgNO3 or AgNPs solutions were able to penetrate the seed coat into endosperm and embryonic tissues. The concentration of Ag increased as the external concentration of AgNPs or AgNO3 increased (Table S3). Ag concentrations of AgNPs10-primed seeds were significantly lower than both groups of AgNO3 treatments, while those of AgNO320-primed seeds were the highest. Although Ag concentrations of AgNPs20 were significantly lower than AgNO320, they were not statistically different from AgNO310. The higher concentrations of Ag found in AgNO320-primed seeds could be due to higher solubility and bioavailability of AgNO3 solution compared to those of AgNPs solution. This result corresponded well with the data on Ag+ ion release (Table S2), demonstrating that AgNO3 priming solution had higher Ag+ concentration than AgNPs priming solution.
Nanopriming can enhance starch metabolism for rice seedling growth
Starch metabolism in rice seedlings was assessed in terms of α -amylase activity and total soluble sugars. After 6 days of seed germination, nanopriming treatments significantly enhanced α-amylase activity in rice seedlings compared with control and other primed seedlings (Fig. 5a). The α-amylase activity of seedlings increased 2.6 and 2.5 folds in AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 priming treatments, respectively, compared to control seedings. The α-amylase activities of seedlings of AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 treatments were almost 1.3 and 1.2 times greater than those in the hydropriming group, while the α-amylase activities in the AgNO310 and AgNO320-treated seedlings were not significantly different from the control. Likewise, the total soluble sugar contents of seedlings were induced from 2.0 to 2.2 folds by nanopriming treatments (AgNPs10 and AgNPs20) compared to the control, while 1.8-fold increase was observed in the hydroprimed seedlings (Fig. 5b). In the AgNO3 priming treatments, the total soluble sugars remained almost unchanged compared to control.
We also confirmed above results by measuring amylase production and secretion from embryoless half-seeds using a starch agar plate α-amylase assay method. Clear zones appeared after IKI staining when isolated endosperms of half seeds were incubated in starch agar containing gibberellins (GA), indicating expression and secretion of α-amylases that hydrolyzed starch32. After 3 days of incubation, numbers of clear zone recorded from nanoprimed seeds were higher than that from other primed seeds and unprimed control (Fig. S4), corresponding with rapid germination of nanoprimed seeds compared to other treatments. Besides, clear zone areas observed in nanoprimed seeds were larger than in other priming treatments, indicating the higher levels of α-amylase expression and production from nanoprimed seeds. Control plate without GA showed no amylase production from embryoless half-seeds.
Starch granule morphology
We also observed the morphological change of isolated starch in both unprimed and primed seeds after 24 h of imbibition. It can be observed from SEM results that in general individual starch granules (ISGs) of rice seeds of unprimed and primed groups were polyhedral in appearance with irregular shapes (Fig. 6), corresponding with previous reports33, 34. Some compound starch granules (CSGs) were observed in control, hydroprimed and SN-primed seeds, suggesting that starchy endosperm of these treatments had low starch decomposition rate at initial phase of germination. On the contrary, starch granules of AgNPs-primed seeds did not form the CSGs and contained some smaller ISGs, indicating higher degrees of starch decomposition. Moreover, some starch granules of nanoprimed seeds had small pits on their surface, indicating a higher amylase activity compared to control and other primed seeds.
Nanopriming enhanced dehydrogenase activity in rice seedlings
Dehydrogenase activity is an indicator of root vitality and used as comprehensive assessment index reflecting the metabolic activity level and root’s ability to absorb nutrients and water35. After 6 days of seed germination, pronounced increase (∼2.3 to 2.5-fold) in root dehydrogenase activity over unprimed seedlings was found in nanopriming treatments (Fig. 5c). Root dehydrogenase activity of AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 priming treatments was also significantly higher (∼1.3- and 1.2-fold) than that of the hydropriming group, while in the silver nitrate treatments it remained almost unchanged compared to the control.
Nanopriming enhanced aquaporin gene expression in aged rice seeds
In order to elucidate the molecular basis for changes in seed metabolism in response to priming treatments, the expression levels of two aquaporin genes, PIP1;1 and PIP2;1, which are responsible for water uptake were monitored in germinating seeds at 24 h of imbibition. The expression levels of the two aquaporin genes in AgNO3-primed seeds and unprimed control were not obviously different. On the other hand, priming with AgNPs markedly enhanced the expression of aquaporin genes, especially PIP2;1 as compared to the control and other priming treatments (Fig.S5), coinciding with the higher percentage of seed water uptake at 24 h (Table 1). The transcript levels of both PIP1;1 and PIP2;11 in hydroprimed seeds also increased as compared with AgNO3-primed seeds and control, but their expression levels were lower level than nanopriming treatments.
Nanopriming modulated antioxidant enzyme activity in seeds after priming
Antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT) activities in unprimed and primed seeds varied significantly ( p < 0.05) in response to different seed priming treatments (Fig. 7a,b). In dry seeds (0 h of imbibition), SOD activities of both unprimed control and primed seeds were on the same level (Fig. 7a). However, when seeds were imbibed in water for 24 h, activity levels of SOD in both nanoprimed seeds and hydroprimed seeds were higher than those in the unprimed control and AgNO3-primed seeds, although the values of AgNPs10-primed seeds were not significantly different from hydroprimed seeds. Interestingly, considerable increase in CAT activity in nanoprimed seeds was observed in dry seeds (0 h of imbibition) after priming with AgNPs compared to control and other primed seeds (Fig. 7b). After 24 h of imbibition, activity levels of CAT in AgNPs10- and AgNPs20-primed seeds increased by 71% and 61%, respectively, compared with the control, which coincides with the rapid radicle protrusion and confirms the connection between the raise in CAT activity and radicle protrusion. Hydroprimed seeds also had higher CAT activity compared to control and AgNO3-primed seeds, which had lowest CAT activities, corresponding with their delay in germination (Fig. 4a).
Quantification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in unprimed and primed seeds
The contents of two different ROS species, i.e. hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anions (O2 •–) were quantified spectrophotometrically in the embryos of seeds at 0 and 24 h. At 0 h (dry seeds), the O2 •– contents in the embryos of all tested seeds were not significantly different (Fig. 7c). In contrast, when seeds were imbibed in water for 24 h, O2 •– contents of both AgNPs10- and AgNPs20-primed seeds significantly increased by ∼42% and 33%, respectively compared to control. The contents of O2 •– in hydroprimed seeds also slightly increased (∼12%) compared to control, while there were no significant changes of O2 •– between AgNO3 treatments and control. Interestingly, priming treatments with AgNPs can reduce H2O2 contents as both nanoprimed seeds showed lower levels than control and AgNO3-primed seeds at 0 h of imbibition (Fig. 7d), whereas AgNPs10 showed no significant difference from hydroprimed seeds. At 24 h of imbibition, H2O2 contents of all tested seeds leveled up. Interestingly, H2O2 contents of AgNPs10- and AgNPs20-primed seeds increased by ∼33% and 32%, respectively, compared to control. Also, levels of H2O2 in nanoprimed seeds were higher than hydroprimed and AgNO3-primed seeds. Hydroprimed seeds showed a slight increase in H2O2 contents (∼15%) compared to control, whereas no significant differences between unprimed control and AgNO3-treated seeds were observed.
in vivo fluorescence imaging and histochemical localization of ROS production
The distribution and accumulation of H2O2 in germinating seeds at 24 h were visualized with a specific fluorescent probe, DCF-DA. After 24 h of imbibition, coleorhiza of both hydroprimed and nanoprimed seeds began to protrude, while AgNPs-primed seeds and unprimed control did not. The fluorescence signal intensities for nanoprimed and hydroprimed treatments were stronger than those of the unprimed and AgNO3-primed treatments, whereas the H2O2-excited fluorescence intensity was stronger in nanoprimed seeds than hydroprimed seeds (Fig. 8). Fluorescence imaging also showed that H2O2 was located mainly in coleorhizal zone and partly in the aleurone layer in germinating seeds.
After 36 h of imbibitions, we localized H2O2 and O2 •– in germinating seeds using DAB and NBT staining, respectively. Results showed that in nanoprimed and hydroprimed seeds embryo and aleurone layer were somewhat stained by DAB, whereas embryo showed stronger staining than aleurone layer. Coleorhiza and radicle of nanoprimed seeds, which were more developed than unprimed and other primed seeds, showed higher accumulation of brown spots indicating the higher level of H2O2. Besides, the production and accumulation of H2O2 were greater in coleorhiza and radicle than in coleoptiles of germinating seeds (Fig. 9). Also, NBT staining indicated a marked increase of O2 •– in germinating nanoprimed seed than unprimed control and other primed seeds (Fig. 9). Although NBT stained strongly as dark purple color product in coleorhiza and radicle of nanoprimed seeds, it also stained coleoptiles with pale purple, indicating O2 •– could participate in cell elongation in these structures during germination.
Discussion
Characterization of phytosynthesized AgNPs
Characterization of photosynthesized AgNPs revealed some useful information. For example, reduction of Ag+ ions into AgNPs during exposure to the plant extracts could be visualized by color change, with kaffir lime leaf extracts turning from pale yellow to dark brown color (Fig. S1), indicating the reduction of Ag+ ions into AgNPs. Change in color was due to the excitation of the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) in AgNPs36. UV-vis absorption spectrophotometer is used to investigate the SPR phenomenon. In this study, a single, strong, and broad SPR peak at 441 nm was observed in the UV-vis spectrum, confirming the successful synthesis of AgNPs. Previous studies suggested that a SPR peak located between 410 and 450 nm exists for AgNPs and could be attributed to spherical shaped NPs36. The SPR peak is reported to be very sensitive to the size and shape of the NPs, amount of plant extract, AgNO3 concentration, and the type of phytochemicals or biomolecules present in the leaf extract37. Broadening of UV–visible peak observed in this study also suggested that phytosynthesized AgNPs were polydisperse in nature38.
TEM micrographs of the phytosynthesized AgNPs indicated that the particles were spherical and ellipsoidal, having an average size of 6–36 nm (Fig. 1a). SAED pattern with bright circular rings indicates the crystalline nature of AgNPs, which are similar to previous report26. Our SAED data were also corroborated with the XRD pattern of the same materials (Fig. 1c). XRD pattern of phytosynthesized AgNPs matches with the characteristics of fcc crystalline structure of metallic silver (JCPDS file No.04–0783)25. Also, the intensity and broadening of peaks lend further support that the obtained products are crystalline in nature and small crystallite size, respectively. The unassigned peaks marked with asterisks could be due to the crystallization of bio-organic phase, e.g. polysaccharides and proteins present in the leaf extracts, occurring on the surface of AgNPs31.
Possible mechanism of AgNPs formation
Our FTIR analysis showed various functional groups of phytochemicals found in kaffir lime leaf extract coated onto AgNPs surface, especially hydroxyl, carbonyl and amine groups. These functional groups could be derived from flavonoids, phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, sugars and proteins, which could act as reducing and stabilizing agents39. Kaffir lime leaves have been reported to have high levels of natural antioxidant polyphenols, including flavonoids and tannins, terpenoids, and volatile compounds, e.g. citronellal monoterpenoid (linalool), acyclic terpene alcohol and viridiflorol40. Based on the phytochemicals abundant in the plant leaves, the plausible mechanism of AgNPs formation using phytochemicals is shown in Fig. 10. Upon the addition of plant extracts to the Ag+ aqueous solution, the Ag+-phytomolecule complex intermediate is formed, and the phenolic groups could donate electron or H+ to Ag+ ions resulting in the reduced Ag0. After the phenol ring undergoes oxidation, it converts to its quinone form. The electrochemical potential difference between Ag+ ions and phytomolecules drives the reaction, and the formed AgNPs are stabilized by the lone pair of electrons and π-electrons of quinone structures28. Carbohydrates and sugars present in the plant leaf extracts can also act as mild reducing agents41. Moreover, the carboxylate group present in the proteins which has greater affinity to act as surfactant by forming a protein layer on NPs could stabilize protein through negatively charged carboxylate group26. Further studies using advanced analytical tools, such as gas chromatography (GC) are required to determine the exact phytochemicals present in kaffir lime leaves, which are responsible for the bioreduction of silver.
AgNPs generated hydroxyl radicals, but Ag + did not
In the cell free system or priming solution, only AgNPs solution generated •OH (Fig. 3), which correspond with previous reports using a cell free system42 and cell culture system43. In contrast, Ag+ derived from AgNO3 did not produce •OH in our test system, which is consistent with a previous study of Li et al.42 who reported that the addition of Ag+ inhibited the ESR signal or did not produce •OH in cell free system. Recent studies indicated that the formation of •OH by AgNPs occurs via a mechanism similar to Fenton reaction in which AgNPs act as a Fenton-like reagent42, 43 as follows:
Ag + H2O2 + H+ = Ag+ + •OH + H2O
Since the valence of Ag changes from zero to one, the AgNPs may be viewed as “Fenton nanoparticles”, and the concentration dependence should be predicted by reaction43. That is, the production of •OH could be accelerated by increasing AgNPs or H2O2 concentration, or decreasing the pH of the buffer solution. Conversely, •OH production could be inhibited by addition of Ag+ or increasing the pH of the buffer43. Therefore, the presence of Ag+ as observed in our study could suppress the generation of •OH. The role of AgNPs mediated •OH generation for enhancing seed germination is discussed below.
Nanopriming can stimulate seed germination of rice aged seeds by enhancing water uptake and starch metabolism
Seed priming with phytosynthesized AgNPs solutions at 10 and 20 mg L-1 induced more rapid water uptake at 4 and 24 h of imbibtion (Table 1). This data corresponded well with the early protrusion of radicles and higher germination percentage in nanoprimed seeds compared to other priming treatments and control. Previous literature highlighted that priming treatment can improve seed water uptake, as primed seeds exhibited a faster imbibition in comparison with non-primed ones, although pre-treated seeds were dried after priming to reach the same water content as non-primed ones44. Besides, seed priming with AuNPs also increased water uptake in maize plant5. Water uptake in seed germination process is essential because mature seeds are quite dry and need sufficient amount of water to start cellular metabolism and growth45. As the activities of dehydrogenase, a key enzyme in cellular respiration, in seedling roots of nanopriming treatments were higher than those of unprimed control and other treatments, this could be attributed to the consequence of rapid water uptake occurred in nanoprimed seeds. Thus, higher water uptake can enhance seed germination and seedling development through complex networks.
We also observed that two aquaporin genes, PIP1;1 and PIP2;11, involved in water uptake were up-regulated in germinating seeds at 24 h of imbibitions (Fig. S5). Qian et al.46 also found that, in Arabidopsis seedlings, the transcript level of the aquaporins, including PIP 1;2, PIP 2;1, PIP 2;2, SIP 1;1, and TIP 1;1 increased approximately 2-fold over the control levels after treatment with 0.2 or 0.5 mgL−1 AgNPs for one week. Aquaporins (water channels) are transmembrane proteins which not only facilitate the diffusion of water across biological membranes and regulate water homeostasis via a complex mechanism46, 47, but also facilitate gases such as CO2, nutrients, e.g., boron (B), silicon (Si), and reactive oxygen species (ROS)47. Previous studies indicated that certain concentrations of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) (40 μg mL−1) and AgNPs (0.2 and 0.5 mg L−1) can significantly activate the expression of aquaporin genes in tomato roots48 and Arabidopsis seedlings46, respectively. Besides, CNTs (multiwalled CNTs) can stimulate the expression of aquaporin genes and could play a role in the enhancement of seed water uptake during germination of some vegetable crops49. Thus, higher expression of aquaporin genes observed in nanoprimed seeds could be one of the mechanisms which enhanced seed germination.
We noted that at the time of water uptake or aquaporin gene expression increased, more H2O2 accumulation was also observed in nanoprimed seeds at 24 h of imbibition compared to unprimed and other primed seeds. This suggests that there is connection between ROS and aquaporin genes in controlling seed germination. Past studies suggested that a complex interplay may exist between aquaporins and biological relevant ROS50. Specific aquaporin isoforms can facilitate the passive diffusion of H2O2 across biological membranes and regulate the membrane permeability of H2O2, thereby acting in redox signaling process50, 51. Thus, the upregulation of aquaporin genes observed in this study could facilitate the diffusion of H2O2 in germinating rice seeds, which further lends support to our argument that both aquaporins and ROS could participate in enhancing seed germination (discussed later).
As demonstrated by colorimetric and starch-agar plate assays, we also found that nanopriming was the most effective treatment in improving starch metabolism of rice seeds and seedlings. Our results confirmed the existing literature that priming can enhance starch metabolism during germination15, 52. α-A mylase is hydrolytic enzyme responsible for the degradation of reserve carbohydrate to soluble sugars to maintain active respiratory metabolism for seed germination and subsequent seedling growth until photosynthesis is sufficient to support growth9. An increase in germination rate and seedling vigor of nanoprimed seeds observed in this study could partly be explained as a consequence of increased activity of α-amylase allowing faster rate of starch hydrolysis in germinating nanoprimed seeds. This resulted in more availability of soluble sugars necessary for generating the energy required for seedling growth, thereby leading to increased speed of germination.
We also found that nanopriming can enhance starch degradation during seed germination compared to control and other primed seeds (Fig. 6). Starch granules of nanoprimed seeds did not form the CSGs and contained some smaller ISGs, indicating higher degrees of starch decomposition. Moreover, some starch granules of nanoprimed seeds had small pits on their surface. A study by Man et al.53 found that α-amylase pitted the starch granule surface first, then penetrated into the interior and hydrolyzed the granule from the inside out, implying that α-amylase activity was induced higher in nanoprimed seeds during the first 24 h of imbibition. The increase in amylase activity and production in nanoprimed seeds resulted in higher starch degradation and rapid seed germination.
Earlier, Srivastava et al.19 suggested that pyrite NPs (FeS2 NPs) could produce H2O2 in situ on their surface in the presence of water, and are also considered as pyrite-only Fenton-like (PF) reagent, which could generate highly reactive •OH. These researchers also highlighted that FeS2 NPs could mimic the enzymatic activity of amylase enzyme to enhance the breakdown of starch in spinach seeds. Our study also revealed that AgNPs could act as Fenton like reagent and mediate the •OH generation as discussed above. Thus, AgNPs might behave in a similar manner to pyrite NPs in enhancing amylase activity in rice seed.
Differential toxicity of Ag + (AgNO3) and AgNPs
Previous studies comparing the biological effects of AgNPs and AgNO3 have led to mixed conclusions; some studies revealed higher toxicity and/or bio-uptake for AgNPs than AgNO3 54, 55; other studies report the opposite conclusion56–58. In the present study, Ag accumulation in seeds primed with AgNPs was lower than those of AgNO3 (see supporting information, Table S3). Similar results were also observed in Allium 57, castor59, and maize plants58, although treatment and culture methods of these studies were different from our approach. In addition, we also observed that seedlings developed from AgNO3 priming treatments showed stunted and slow growth compared to AgNPs priming treatments, indicating that AgNO3 showed phytotoxic effect than AgNPs. Our study confirmed the findings about stronger phytotoxic effect of AgNO3 compared to AgNPs previously reported by other authors57–59. Taken together, these data indicated that higher Ag accumulation could inhibit seed germination and seedling growth.
Although AgNO3 at appropriate concentrations, especially ultra-high dilution can be beneficial to plant growth60, silver ions at high concentration can cause phytotoxic effects in several plants57–59. It is known that Ag+ ions can interact metabolically with Cu and Se and replace H2 from the sulfhydryl groups of the photosynthetic enzymes, changing their structure and inactivating them. In addition, Ag can form complexes with amino acids, nitrogenous bases, and nucleotides, as well as with their corresponding macromolecular forms, indicating its potential to be either highly toxic or easily inactivated by the plant61. Besides, respiratory enzymes can be interfered by Ag+ ions due to their high affinity with thiol group of the enzymes62. Thus, higher concentration of Ag internalized into AgNO3-primed seeds can induce oxidative stress in seeds, leading to lower germination indices and seedling vigor index compared with AgNP-primed seeds.
It is known that the major factors that influence AgNPs toxicity and uptake in plants are attributed to the physico-chemical properties of particles, such as size, shape, surface coating, and experimental conditions including concentration, exposure time, method of exposure, and cell type or plant species57, 63, 64. Although the mechanism of toxic effects of AgNPs has not yet been clearly elucidated, it is generally believed that the toxicity of AgNPs on cells and organisms is partly driven by a release of Ag+ ions57. A previous study suggested that the oxidative stress effects of AgNPs were delayed as compared to AgNO3 due to the slower release of Ag+ ions from the AgNPs65. There was also evidence that Ag+ (released from AgNO3) exerted stronger toxicity on poplar and Arabidopsis growth than AgNPs66. In the present study, the release of Ag+ ions from AgNPs priming solution was relatively low (Table S2), corresponding with lower amount of Ag internalized into seeds (Table S3). Based on our data and past literature, it can be surmised that during the 24 h priming exposure, rice seed uptake of Ag+ from AgNPs was less than the AgNO3 due to slow release of AgNPs.
However, the effects of AgNPs are not simply due to the release of Ag+ ions into the surrounding environment as Ag+ and AgNPs commonly coexist57. It was suggested that AgNPs themselves can induce cellular oxidative stress and genotoxicity through overproduction of ROS42. Additionally, Li et al.42 demonstrated using ESR analysis that AgNPs can produce •OH directly, while AgNO3 did not. These data indicated that the mechanism of toxicity of AgNPs and Ag+ ions are different, and the nanoparticles, but not the released ions, mainly contribute to the AgNPs genotoxicity. ESR analysis also revealed that only AgNPs generated •OH. Thus, differential toxicity of AgNPs and Ag+ (AgNO3) could be due to the fact that AgNPs generate ROS slowly via their surface, while Ag + produces ROS via perturbation of the cell respiratory chain42.
As mentioned above, toxicity of AgNPs also depends on surface chemistry and coating. It has been reported that AgNPs synthesized using phytochemicals are coated by a thin layer of some capping organic material from the plant extracts and thus, this organic coating reduces their phytotoxicity than those synthesized using chemical methods64. Additionally, cellular uptake and variation of toxicity effects of NPs could be related to experimental conditions used, especially concentration and exposure time, and this would change (positive effect to negative or vice versa) if condition varies63, 67.
The concentrations of NPs used in past toxicological tests were extremely high and not conducted using a realistic environmental dose, which can lead to biased or misleading conclusion on the toxicity of these NPs, especially in low concentration ranges and limiting the potential beneficial applications of NPs in agriculture and other related technology68. Our study showed beneficial effects of AgNPs in term of nanopriming, in which condition used only low concentration of AgNPs and short exposure time, i.e. 24 h. This method not only reduces the toxicity of AgNPs, but also enhances the germination and starch metabolism of rice aged seeds. In addition, our ICP-OES analysis confirmed that no Ag uptake was observed in plant shoots and roots derived from seeds primed with nanopriming (Table S3). This implied that translocation of Ag element from seeds into plant vegetative organs did not occur or the Ag content in vegetative parts was below detection limit of the ICP-OES. This might be because the concentrations of AgNPs used in priming treatments were relatively low and seeds were exposed to the solution only for a short period. Thus, nanopriming would be alternative method for promoting seed germination for agricultural practices.
Nanopriming modulated ROS-antioxidant enzyme system of aged seeds
Generally, seeds stored for a longer period are prone to oxidative damage due to the cumulative increase of ROS coupled with decline of the antioxidant potential of the cells, leading to seed aging and a loss of germination ability69, 70. In this study, we found that aged seeds without priming (unprimed seeds) showed lower activities of antioxidant enzymes, but higher levels of ROS, especially H2O2 at 0 h of imbibition (dry seed) (Fig. 7c,d). On the contrary, priming seeds with AgNPs can alter the activities of the antioxidant enzymes, especially CAT to higher levels, while reduce ROS production and accumulation after re-drying seeds (0 h of imbibition) compared to unprimed control and other treatments (Fig. 7b). As determined by spectrophotometric, in vivo fluorescence imaging, and histochemical localization assays, nanoprimed seeds produced higher H2O2 and O2 •– after 24 and 36 h of imbibition. Coincidently, antioxidant enzymes, i.e. SOD and CAT also increased significantly in nanoprimed seeds compared to unprimed and other primed seeds. Based on these evidences, therefore, alteration of ROS production and antioxidant enzyme activities in rice aged seeds after priming can be linked with higher germination in nanoprimed seeds compared with the unprimed ones.
In a recent concept of plant seed physiology, it has been proposed that the germination is completed only when the ROS content is within an oxidative window that allows ROS signaling71, 72. Above or below the ‘oxidative window for germination’, low or high amounts of ROS would not permit progress towards germination. Additionally, H2O2 is one of key ROS molecules acting as signalling molecule for the regulation of seed germination, and the precise regulation of H2O2 content by antioxidant machinery is essential to achieve a balance between oxidative signalling that stimulates germination and oxidative damage that prevents or delays germination73. Thus, higher level of H2O2 observed in nanoprimed seeds can act as signal molecule and was consistent with oxidative window concept, which resulted in better germination and faster seedling growth compared with that in unprimed and other primed seeds.
Antioxidant systems also play an important role in seed physiology71. In order to act as the positive regulator of germination, ROS accumulation must be tightly controlled by antioxidant systems. In the present study, activities of two antioxidant enzymes, i.e. SOD and CAT are relatively high in nanoprimed seeds at 24 h of imbibition, coinciding with high levels of ROS. Previous reports suggested that primed seeds exhibited more robust antioxidant system than unprimed ones during germination or early seedling establishment8, and increased antioxidant properties in primed seeds can enhance fitness of seedlings and plants subjected to stress conditions52. Similar to our finding, Kibinza et al.74 demonstrated that osmopriming sunflower seeds can increase the expression levels of a gene encoding catalase, and suggested that CAT is the key enzyme responsible for the recovery of vigor in aged seeds. SOD is the primary antioxidant enzyme that scavenges O2 •– to H2O2, while CAT catalyzes the conversion of H2O2 to H2O75. Considering the relationship between ROS and antioxidant enzymes, the high amount of antioxidant enzymes observed in nanoprimed seeds can be due to induction by AgNPs-mediated ROS, which is a tightly controlled mechanism to balance ROS in oxidative window range for stimulating seed germination as discuss above.
Mechanism of enhancing seed germination and starch metabolism by nanopriming
To date, the mechanism underlying nanopriming-induced seed germination has not yet been reported in the literature. In the present study, the mechanism of beneficial roles of AgNPs in inducing seed germination was hypothetically proposed, including (i) creation of the seed coat nanopores, (ii) mild stress-induced agent or ROS-generating agent, and (iii) nanocatalyst for enhancing starch-degrading enzyme activity.
Although the precise mechanism behind nanoparticles action on physiological enhancement of seed germination is not clearly understood, one of the possible mechanisms to explain this scenario is based on Khodakovsakaya et al.’s hypothesis76. These authors hypothesized that carbon nanotubes were able to penetrate seed coat by creating small pores, resulting in increased water uptake and up-regulation of the expression of aquaporin genes involved water uptake. Our study also revealed that priming with AgNPs could enhance rapid water uptake and expression of aquaporin genes in germinating seeds. Meanwhile, a higher accumulation of ROS (H2O2 and O2 •–) was observed in germinating seeds of nanopriming treatments than that of unprimed control and other priming treatments, indicating that more ROS are required for stimulating seed germination. Based on these evidences, both aquaporins and ROS could participate in activating seed germination. Previous studies suggested that aquaporins not only help water uptake, but also facilitate H2O2 or ROS diffusion across biological membranes51. Also, the interplay of aquaporins with ROS has been reported for regulating plant development47, 50. Thus, we further hypothesized that upon the formation of nanopores, the influx of the water into seeds becomes rapid, and also trigger the expression of aquaporin genes. Once aquaporin genes are up-regulated, they can facilitate the diffusion of ROS, especially H2O2 through biological membrane. The elevated ROS must be tightly controlled by seed antioxidant systems to produce ROS in optimum range of oxidative window as signalling molecules for triggering essential metabolic activity of seed for promoting seed germination and seedling development (Fig. 11).
Furthermore, we observed that amylase activity increased in response to nanopriming treatment resulting in increased soluble sugars. Increasing sugar concentrations in the cells can lead to lowering the osmotic potential, and hence water potential. This increases the difference (gradient) between the water potential outside and inside the tissues facilitating water movement into the seeds by osmosis. As soluble sugar contents increased in parallel to increased amylase activity in nanoprimed seeds, the enhancement of water uptake in their seeds could also be attributed to the change of internal osmotic potential due to increased soluble sugars (solutes).
Although plant cell growth is driven by water uptake, the growth is restricted by cell wall. As plant cell walls determine shape and the rate and direction of growth of individual cells as well as the mechanical resistance of whole tissues, the loosening of cell walls is an important process in all stages of plant development, requiring elongation growth or tissue weakening77. It has been approved that ROS, including •OH can act as a key component in cell wall loosening, testa and endosperm weakening, which is essential for radicle protrusion in seed germination77–79. As observed by ESR technique, AgNPs could mediate the generation of •OH, and thus act as ROS-generating agent. Hypothetically, it is likely that during the short duration (i.e. 24 h) of soaking seeds in nanopriming solutions, •OH generated by AgNPs could help loosening seed coat cell walls as well as endosperm weakening for enhancing seed germination. Besides, although ROS at high levels could induce oxidative stress, their optimum levels can be beneficial for seed germination. A slightly enhanced level of oxidative stress has been observed to stimulate seed germination80. Thus, priming seeds with AgNPs solutions could also induce mild oxidative stress for stimulating seed germination in addition to loosening cell wall.
We also propose another hypothesis that AgNPs penetrating the seeds might be important for their role as nanocatalyst in the hydrolysis of starch catalyzed by α-amylase and thereby increasing the reaction rate. It has been recently reported that AgNPs have the potential to act as nanocatalyst, and the rate of enzymatic digestion of soluble starch increased rapidly in the presence of nanosilver81. However, the exact mechanism behind the enhancement of starch hydrolysis by AgNPs is still unclear. A plausible explanation for one of the possible scenarios could be that, in the presence of AgNPs inside the seed, the α-amylase could possibly interact with functional groups of biomolecular ligands on the surface of phytochemicals-coated AgNPs through the thiol linkages, and thus the enzyme molecule is immobilized on the surface of AgNPs81, 82. Consequently, the α-amylase-bound nanoparticles complex (α-amylase-NPs complex) is able to enhance the rate of starch hydrolysis (Fig. 11). Structurally, α-amylase consists of two cysteine thiol groups which can expose to the medium or substrate and away from the active site83. It was suggested that AgNPs could be stabilized by the protein molecule through the thiol linkages and thus the enzyme molecule could be immobilized81. Therefore, it is possible that the α-amylase induced inside seeds could form the thiol linkages with functional groups of biomolecular ligands on the surface of phytochemicals-coated AgNPs with the active site being available for catalysis. The faster rate of starch hydrolysis of NP-amylase complex can be due to the enzyme conformational change, but the enzyme still retains its active site for catalysis82, 83. It has been well documented that upon a nanocarrier support, the efficiency of the enzyme increased compared to its free form81, 84. Therefore, the enhancement of enzyme activity and stability resulting in higher starch degradation may be attributed to the conformational change in the enzyme after interacting with molecules coated onto the surface of Ag nanocarriers. However, the exact mechanism warrants further investigation.
Conclusion
In the present work, eco-friendly synthesis of AgNPs was successfully demonstrated through the use of kaffir lime leaves extracts as natural reducing and stabilizing agents. Various characterization techniques (UV-vis, TEM, EDX, SAED, XRD and FTIR) confirmed the formation of phytochemicals-capped AgNPs. We demonstrated that AgNPs can be applied as nanopriming agent for enhancing seed germination and starch metabolism of rice aged seeds. It was evident that AgNPs can internalize seed coat and support water uptake inside seeds, leading to promote seed germination and starch metabolism. Besides, our study indicated that priming with AgNPs priming could up-regulate the expression of aquaporin genes, thus facilitating water and H2O2 diffusion. Meanwhile, elevated ROS, especially H2O2 observed in nanoprimed seeds during germination could act as signal molecules for stimulating germination process. These evidences suggested that ROS and aquaporins play essential roles in enhancing seed germination. Furthermore, as evidenced by ESR technique, AgNPs could mediate the •OH generation, while AgNO3 did not. Thus, we hypothesized that when soaking seeds with nanopriming solution, •OH could help loosening seed coat cell wall and endosperms. Additionally, AgNPs penetrated into seeds, as determined by ICP-OES, could possibly interact with α-amylase enzyme or act as nanocatalyst; thereby enhancing seed starch degradation for seed germination and seedling growth. Since our nanopriming technique works with low concentration of AgNPs and does not apply NPs into soils, it prevents the dispersal of large amounts of NPs into the ecosystems. Nanopriming could be further exploited by seed companies as a new technique for commercial seed priming. Our study can serve as an initiative of nanopriming application for sustainable agricultural practices and agri-seed industry in the future.
Methods
Chemicals and materials used for AgNPs synthesis
AgNO3 (99.98%) was purchased from Merck (Germany). All aqueous solutions were prepared using double distilled deionized (DI) water. All reagents were of analytical grade. All glassware was washed with aqua regia solution and rinsed three times with DI water.
Plant materials
Kaffir lime (Citrus hystrix D.C.), a small tree belonging to family Rutaceae, has been widely used as flavoring in Southeast Asian cuisines due to its highly aromatic and unique citrus flavors and strong fragrances. Kaffir lime leaves possess some important bioactive compounds (e.g. polyphenols), and given its good antioxidant properties40 we selected kaffir lime leaves (Inset of Figure S1 in Supporting information) as natural material source for AgNPs biosynthesis.
Preparation of plant extract
Preparation of plant extract as reducing and stabilizing agents for AgNPs synthesis was done according to the method of Karthik et al.37 with some modifications. Briefly, the fresh leaf samples were initially rinsed with running tap water and then washed with DI water to remove the adhering dust particles and other contaminants. After blot drying, leaves (20 g) were cut into small pieces, blended in a kitchen blender with 100 ml of DI water. The blended extract was heated at 80 °C for 5 min and cooled at room temperature. Then, the extract was filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper before centrifuging at 5000 rpm for 15 min to remove the heavy batteries. The filtered extract was kept in refrigerator (4 °C) up to 1 week for it to be used as reducing and stabilizing agents.
Synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)
In a typical reaction procedure, 3 mL of kaffir lime leaf extract was added to 12 mL of 1 mM AgNO3 aqueous solution and incubated in the dark for 1 h with gentle stirring. The solution turned to yellowish brown color after 1 h incubation and the reaction completed within 24 h. The AgNPs obtained from the solution were purified by repeated centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min followed by dispersion of the pellet in sterile DI water 4 times. The water-suspended nanoparticles were lyophilized for 48 h followed by characterization for the structure and composition.
Characterization of phytosynthesized AgNPs
The bioreduction of the silver ions in the solution was determined under UV-visible spectroscopy using Perkin-Elmer Lambda 2 UV198 between 300 to 800 nm. Morphological details of purified AgNPs were measured with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at 200 kV using FEI TECNAI G2 20 equipped with selected area electron diffraction pattern (SAED). Simultaneously, the elemental compositions of the samples were also recorded using Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using Cu Kα radiation with λ = 0.15418 nm (Bruker D2 phaser) was used to investigate the crystalline nature and particles size of the synthesized AgNPs. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectra of the freeze-dried samples were recorded using a Bruker Tensor 27 equipment to determine the surface functional groupsof the AgNPs.
Preparation of priming solutions
The phytosynthesized AgNPs were used for seed priming test. AgNPs concentrations at 10 and 20 mg L−1, designated as AgNPs10 and AgNPs20 nanopriming agents, respectively, were freshly prepared by dispersing the particles in deionized water using ultrasonic vibration (100 w, 40 kHz) for 30 min. Similarly, for silver nitrate (AgNO3) priming solutions, two concentrations of AgNO3 at 10 and 20 mg L−1 designated as AgNO310 and AgNO320, respectively, were dissolved in deionized water and kept in dark bottle. Deionized water was used as hydropriming.
Seed priming method
Seeds of jasmine rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105) were obtained from Khon Kaen Rice Research Centre, Thailand. These were naturally aged seeds due to long period of storage under ambient temperature (25–30 °C) for 3 years. The initial seed moisture content (MC) was 8.9% (on dry weight basis). Healthy seeds were selected from the same seed lot and used for all the experiments. For seed priming method, seeds were surface-sterilized in 3% H2O2 and then rinsed with deionized water for several times. Seeds were then soaked in AgNO3 or AgNPs priming solutions for 24 h with continuous aeration. The ratio of seed weight to solution volume was 1:4 (gmL−1). Seeds soaked in deionized water were defined as hydropriming (HP) and were washed three times with deionized water (3 min) and surface-dried on paper towel. Seeds were dried back to their original moisture content in shed at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C), sealed in polythene bags and stored at 4 °C until further use. The untreated seeds were used as the unprimed control (UP).
Germination assay and growth measurement
Germination tests on the primed and unprimed seeds were performed in triplicates. Briefly, a piece of sterile filter paper (Whatman no.1) was placed on a sterile plastic Petri dish (90 × 15 mm) and moistened with 5.0 ml deionized water. Ten sterilized seeds were allowed to equilibrate under room temperature for 24 hrs, then placed in each plate, covered with lid and sealed with Parafilm M® to avoid moisture loss. All Petri plates were kept in an incubator under dark at 25 °C.
After initiation of germination assay, seed germination was monitored daily for 6 days and seeds were considered germinated when the radicle was extended to more than 5 mm. Besides, at the end of germination experiment, length and weight of seedlings (roots and shoots) were measured. The data on germination percentage (GP), germination index (GI), germination rate (GR), and seedling vigour index (SVI) were calculated according to the equations provided elsewhere85, 86.
Seed water uptake and dehydrogenase activity
The water uptake by seeds during imbibition at 4 and 24 h was determined following the method described elsewhere87. Dehydrogenase activity of the root tips was determined according to the method given by Singh et al.88
Starch metabolism and starch agar plate α-amylase assay
Starch metabolism in germinating seed and seedlings was assessed in terms of α-amylase activity and total soluble sugar content15. The α-amylase was determined following the method of Bernfeld89. Germinating seeds at 24 h of imbibition and seedling samples including shoot and root (1 g) were ground, mixed with 100 ml distilled water, and left standing for 24 h at 4 °C. The clear supernatant was collected and stored at −80 °C until analysis. The enzyme activity was determined from the supernatant by 3,5-dinitrosalicyclic acid (DNS) method90. In order to determine total soluble sugar contents, ground seedling sample (1.0 g) was mixed with 10 ml distilled water, left for 24 h at 25 °C15. The mixture was filtered with Whatman No. 42 and the final volume was made to 10 ml with distilled water. Total soluble sugar contents were determined by the phenol sulfuric method91.
The production of α-amylase using starch-agar plate assay was performed as described previously32. The embryoless half-seeds were surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min and washed 5 times with sterilized water. The sterilized half-seeds were placed perpendicularly on autoclaved starch-agar plate [2% agar plate containing 0.2% soluble potato starch, 10 mM sodium acetate and 2 mM CaCl2 (pH 5.3)] and incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 3 days. GA plates were made by adding 1 μM gibberellic acid (GA3) to the cooled agar, while no GA3 was added to negative control plate. They were then removed and amylase production was examined by staining agar plate with IKI solution (0.1% I2 and 1% KI). Clear zones (transparent halos) appear if α-amylases are synthesized in endosperms and secreted into the starch agar, resulting in starch hydrolysis. Four endosperms of each treatment were placed in the same plate. All measurements were performed in triplicates.
Starch granules morphology
After 24 h of imbibition, dehusked seeds from unprimed and primed groups (HP, SNP10 and SN10) were steeped in 0.2% NaOH for 2 days and homogenized in a blender. The homogenate was squeezed through five layers of cotton cloth and then filtered with 100-, 200-, and 400-mesh sieves, successively. Starch granules were washed and further purified according to a method described by Wei et al.33 The isolated starch granules were mounted on the specimen stub and sputter-coated with gold before viewing with scanning electron microscope (SEM, LEO 1450VP) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV.
Measurement of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzyme activities
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content in the rice seed embryos imbibed for 24 h was measured according to the method described by Patterson et al.92, while O2 •– content was determined according to the method of Elstner and Heupel93.
Antioxidant enzymes were extracted from aged rice embryos imbibed for 24 h. Seed embryos (~0.1 g) were homogenized in 2 mL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 2 mM dithiothreitol (DDT), 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 1.25 mM polyethylene glycol 4000 (PEG 4000) under cold conditions. Homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was used for the determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) and catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) as described elsewhere70.
in vivo localization of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in germinating seeds
To in vivo localize and image H2O2 in germinating seeds, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) fluorescence probe was used to stain dehusked seeds after 24 h of imbibition according to the method of Bailly and Kranner94 with minor modifications. Briefly, imbibed seeds were stained with 25 µM DCF-DA in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). Seeds were incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 30 min before rinsing three times with 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) for 5 min each. As negative control, seeds were preincubated with 5 mM ascorbate in darkness for 1 h at 25 oC before adding the probe. The stained seeds were viewed at 4X on a Nikon ECLIPSE 80i fluorescence microscope with NIS-Element AR 3.2 sofware (Melville, NY, USA). The excitation and emission wavelengths for fluorescence probe are 488 and 525 nm, respectively.
Histochemical localization of H2O2 and O2•– in germinating rice seeds
To localize H2O2 and O2 •–, DAB and NBT were used to stain seeds, respectively, as described by Chen et al.95 After 36 h of imbibition, five whole seeds were incubated with 1 mg mL−1 DAB solution (pH 3.8) or 1 mM NBT in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) at room temperature for 30 min. The stained seeds were washed with double-distilled water, and photographed through a bright field mode of Nikon ECLIPSE 80i fluorescence microscope.
Determination of silver contents in seeds, seedlings and priming solutions
Unprimed and primed seeds (10 seeds from each replication) were dehusked and oven-dried at 80 °C for 48 h. Seeding shoots and roots (6 days old) were also oven-dried and used for Ag analysis. A representative sample of up to 0.5 g (seeds) or 0.1 g (shoots or roots) was digested in 9 mL of concentrated nitric acid and 3 mL of hydrofluoric acid for 15 min using the microwave heating system, diluted with MilliQ water and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (Optima 2100 DV ICP-OES, Perkin Elmer Instruments, USA) as described elsewhere96. Similarly, Ag+ ions in priming solutions, i.e. AgNPs10, AgNPs20, AgNO310, AgNO320, and DI water were also analyzed using ICP-OES.
Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) analysis of hydroxyl radicals
The ESR analysis of hydroxyl radicals (•OH) was carried out according to the method of Li et al.42, except that after addition of AgNPs or AgNO3 to spin trap, the particle materials were removed by centrifugation and filtration according to the recommendation of Jeong et al.97 All ESR measurements were performed at room temperature using a Bruker Elexys500 spectrometer. The ESR parameters were as follows: 1 G field modulation, 100 G scan range and 20 mW microwave power for detection of spin adducts using 5-dimethyl-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) spin trap (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
RNA extraction and gene expression analysis
Total RNA was extracted from fresh rice embryos imbibed for 24 h using the PureLink® RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Isolated RNA was further purified using the PureLinkTM DNase Set (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The purity and concentration of RNA were checked using the NANOdrop spectrophotometer. First strand cDNA synthesis was performed using SuperScript® III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression analysis of the two aquaporin genes using semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (sqRT-PCR) was essentially as described previously98. Primer sequences for the studied aquaporin and actin genes were designed according to Sakurai et al.98 and Nounjan et al.99, respectively.
Statistical analysis
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed between treatment samples in a completely randomized block design using three replications and data were analyzed using IMB SPSS statistics version 22. The significant levels of difference for all measured traits were calculated and means were compared by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at 5% probability level. The p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The first author gratefully acknowledges the financial support for his PhD study through the University of Auckland Doctoral Research Scholarship. Financial support from the Salt-Tolerant Rice Research Group, Khon Kaen University, and the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) under the TRF Senior Research Scholar, Grant No. RTA5680008 are also gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Santi Phumying for his technical support on XRD analysis. Assistant Professor Dr Soraya Pornsuwan at Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Thailand is thanked for her technical assistance in ESR analysis. We also acknowledge the Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand for providing facilities for fluorescence microscopic imaging.
Author Contributions
W.M. carried out the experiments, analyzed data and wrote the main manuscript text. A.K.S., P.T. and S.M. designed the experiment, supervised the project, and helped in manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08669-5
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Ajit K. Sarmah, Email: a.sarmah@auckland.ac.nz
Piyada Theerakulpisut, Email: piythe@kku.ac.th.
References
- 1.Parisi C, Vigani M, Rodríguez-Cerezo E. Agricultural Nanotechnologies: What are the current possibilities? Nano Today. 2015;10:124–127. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Servin A, et al. A review of the use of engineered nanomaterials to suppress plant disease and enhance crop yield. J Nanopart. Res. 2015;17:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-2907-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci. Total Environ. 2015;514:131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Borase HP, et al. Plant extract: a promising biomatrix for ecofriendly, controlled synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Appl. Biochem.Biotech. 2014;173:1–29. doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-0831-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mahakham W, Theerakulpisut P, Maensiri S, Phumying S, Sarmah AK. Environmentally benign synthesis of phytochemicals-capped gold nanoparticles as nanopriming agent for promoting maize seed germination. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;573:1089–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh P, Kim Y-J, Zhang D, Yang D-C. Biological synthesis of nanoparticles from plants and microorganisms. Trends Biotechno. 2016;34:588–599. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rajjou L, et al. Seed germination and vigor. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012;63:507–533. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen K, Arora R. Priming memory invokes seed stress-tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013;94:33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kato-Noguchi H, Macías FA. Effects of 6-methoxy-2-benzoxazolinone on the germination and α-amylase activity in lettuce seeds. J.Plant Physiol. 2005;162:1304–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mishra P, Dubey R. Effect of aluminium on metabolism of starch and sugars in growing rice seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2008;30:265–275. doi: 10.1007/s11738-007-0115-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dragicevic V, Spasic M, Simic M, Dumanovic Z, Nikolic B. Stimulative influence of germination and growth of maize seedlings originating from aged seeds by 2, 4-D potencies. Homeopathy. 2013;102:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2013.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Butler L, Hay F, Ellis R, Smith R, Murray T. Priming and re-drying improve the survival of mature seeds of Digitalis purpurea during storage. Ann.Bot. 2009;103:1261–1270. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ibrahim EA. Seed priming to alleviate salinity stress in germinating seeds. J.Plant Physiol. 2016;192:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Horii A, McCue P, Shetty K. Seed vigour studies in corn, soybean and tomato in response to fish protein hydrolysates and consequences on phenolic-linked responses. Bioresource Technol. 2007;98:2170–2177. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hussain, S. et al. Benefits of rice seed priming are offset permanently by prolonged storage and the storage conditions. Sci. Rep. 5 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Mohamed, A. K. S. et al. Interactive effect of salinity and silver nanoparticles on photosynthetic and biochemical parameters of wheat. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 1–12 (2017).
- 17.Panyuta O, et al. The effect of pre-sowing seed treatment with metal nanoparticles on the formation of the defensive reaction of wheat seedlings infected with the eyespot causal agent. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016;11:1–5. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1305-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Taran N, et al. Effect of Zinc and Copper Nanoparticles on Drought Resistance of Wheat Seedlings. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017;12 doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-1839-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Srivastava G, et al. Seed treatment with iron pyrite (FeS 2) nanoparticles increases the production of spinach. RSC Adv. 2014;4:58495–58504. doi: 10.1039/C4RA06861K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, Liu C. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2005;104:83–91. doi: 10.1385/BTER:104:1:083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Latef AAHA, Alhmad MFA, Abdelfattah KE. The possible roles of priming with ZnO nanoparticles in iitigation of salinity stress in lupine (Lupinus termis) Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2017;36:60–70. doi: 10.1007/s00344-016-9618-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kole C, et al. Nanobiotechnology can boost crop production and quality: first evidence from increased plant biomass, fruit yield and phytomedicine content in bitter melon (Momordica charantia) BMC Biotechnol. 2013;13 doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-13-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ratnikova TA, Podila R, Rao AM, Taylor AG. Tomato seed coat permeability to selected carbon nanomaterials and enhancement of germination and seedling growth. Sci. World J. 2015;419215:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2015/419215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nounjan N, Siangliw JL, Toojinda T, Chadchawan S, Theerakulpisut P. Salt-responsive mechanisms in chromosome segment substitution lines of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML105) Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;103:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kathiravan V, Ravi S, Ashokkumar S. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Melia dubia leaf extract and their in vitro anticancer activity. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014;130:116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.03.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ajitha B, Reddy YAK, Reddy PS. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Momordica charantia leaf broth: evaluation of their innate antimicrobial and catalytic activities. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2015;146:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sheny D, Mathew J, Philip D. Phytosynthesis of Au, Ag and Au–Ag bimetallic nanoparticles using aqueous extract and dried leaf of Anacardium occidentale. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011;79:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2011.02.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Edison TNJI, Lee YR, Sethuraman MG. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Terminalia cuneata and its catalytic action in reduction of direct yellow-12 dye. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016;161:122–129. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2016.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Song JY, Jang H-K, Kim BS. Biological synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Magnolia kobus and Diopyros kaki leaf extracts. Process Biochem. 2009;44:1133–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sadeghi B, Gholamhoseinpoor F. A study on the stability and green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Ziziphora tenuior (Zt) extract at room temperature. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015;134:310–315. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.06.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shankar SS, Ahmad A, Sastry M. Geranium leaf assisted biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003;19:1627–1631. doi: 10.1021/bp034070w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chen P-W, Chiang C-M, Tseng T-H, Yu S-M. Interaction between rice MYBGA and the gibberellin response element controls tissue-specific sugar sensitivity of α-amylase genes. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2326–2340. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.038844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wei C, et al. Microstructure and ultrastructure of high-amylose rice resistant starch granules modified by antisense RNA inhibition of starch branching enzyme. J. Agri. Food Chem. 2009;58:1224–1232. doi: 10.1021/jf9031316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Colussi R, et al. Structural, morphological, and physicochemical properties of acetylated high-, medium-, and low-amylose rice starches. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014;103:405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang X, et al. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes can enhance root elongation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012;14:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jyoti K, Baunthiyal M, Singh A. Characterization of silver nanoparticles synthesized using Urtica dioica Linn. leaves and their synergistic effects with antibiotics. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2016;9:217–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2015.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Karthik R, et al. Eco-friendly synthesis of Ag-NPs using Cerasus serrulata plant extract–Its catalytic, electrochemical reduction of 4-NPh and antibacterial activity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016;37:330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.03.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jadhav K, Dhamecha D, Bhattacharya D, Patil M. Green and ecofriendly synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Characterization, biocompatibility studies and gel formulation for treatment of infections in burns. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. 2016;155:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee J, Park EY, Lee J. Non-toxic nanoparticles from phytochemicals: preparation and biomedical application. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2014;37:983–989. doi: 10.1007/s00449-013-1091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wongpornchai, S. Kaffir lime leaf. In Handbook of herbs and spices (ed. Peter, K.V.) 319–328 (Woodhead Publishing, 2012).
- 41.Shukla R, et al. Soybeans as a phytochemical reservoir for the production and stabilization of biocompatible gold nanoparticles. Small. 2008;4:1425–1436. doi: 10.1002/smll.200800525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li Y, et al. Differential genotoxicity mechanisms of silver nanoparticles and silver ions. Arch. Toxicol. 2017;91:509–519. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1730-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.He W, Zhou Y-T, Wamer WG, Boudreau MD, Yin J-J. Mechanisms of the pH dependent generation of hydroxyl radicals and oxygen induced by Ag nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7547–7555. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wojtyla Ł, Lechowska K, Kubala S, Garnczarska M. Molecular processes induced in primed seeds—increasing the potential to stabilize crop yields under drought conditions. J.Plant Physiol. 2016;203:116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bewley, J. D., Bradford, K. & Hilhorst, H. Seeds: physiology of development, germination and dormancy. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
- 46.Qian H, et al. Comparison of the toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver ions on the growth of terrestrial plant model Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Environ. Sci. 2013;25:1947–1956. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60301-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maurel C, et al. Aquaporins in plants. Physiological reviews. 2015;95:1321–1358. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00008.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Villagarcia H, Dervishi E, de Silva K, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV. Surface chemistry of carbon nanotubes impacts the growth and expression of water channel protein in tomato plants. Small. 2012;8:2328–2334. doi: 10.1002/smll.201102661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lahiani MH, et al. Impact of carbon nanotube exposure to seeds of valuable crops. ACS Appl. Mater. Inerfaces. 2013;5:7965–7973. doi: 10.1021/am402052x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cordeiro RM. Molecular dynamics simulations of the transport of reactive oxygen species by mammalian and plant aquaporins. BBA-Gen. Subjects. 2015;1850:1786–1794. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bienert GP, Chaumont F. Aquaporin-facilitated transmembrane diffusion of hydrogen peroxide. BBA-Gen. Subjects. 2014;1840:1596–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zheng M, et al. Seed priming in dry direct-seeded rice: consequences for emergence, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul. 2016;78:167–178. doi: 10.1007/s10725-015-0083-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Man J, et al. Morphology and structural characterization of high-amylose rice starch residues hydrolyzed by porcine pancreatic α-amylase. Food Hydrocolloid. 2013;31:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yin L, et al. More than the ions: the effects of silver nanoparticles on Lolium multiflorum. Environ. Sci. Teechnol. 2011;45:2360–2367. doi: 10.1021/es103995x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yin L, Colman BP, McGill BM, Wright JP, Bernhardt ES. Effects of silver nanoparticle exposure on germination and early growth of eleven wetland plants. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Colman BP, et al. Emerging contaminant or an old toxin in disguise? Silver nanoparticle impacts on ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Teechnol. 2014;48:5229–5236. doi: 10.1021/es405454v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cvjetko P, et al. Toxicity of silver ions and differently coated silver nanoparticles in Allium cepa roots. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2017;137:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pokhrel LR, Dubey B. Evaluation of developmental responses of two crop plants exposed to silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2013;452:321–332. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yasur J, Rani PU. Environmental effects of nanosilver: impact on castor seed germination, seedling growth, and plant physiology. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013;20:8636–8648. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1798-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Scherer-Pongratz W, Endler PC, Lothaller H, Stephen S. Wheat and ultra high diluted silver nitrate–further experiments and re-analysis of data. Homeopathy. 2015;104:246–249. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xu Q, et al. Accumulation and acute toxicity of silver in Potamogeton crispus L. Journal of hazardous materials. 2010;173:186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.McEvoy JG, Zhang Z. Antimicrobial and photocatalytic disinfection mechanisms in silver-modified photocatalysts under dark and light conditions. J. Photoch. Photobio. C. 2014;19:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kettler K, Veltman K, van de Meent D, van Wezel A, Hendriks AJ. Cellular uptake of nanoparticles as determined by particle properties, experimental conditions, and cell type. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014;33:481–492. doi: 10.1002/etc.2470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Amooaghaie R, Saeri MR, Azizi M. Synthesis, characterization and biocompatibility of silver nanoparticles synthesized from. Nigella sativa leaf extract in comparison with chemical silver nanoparticles. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2015;120:400–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ribeiro MJ, Maria VL, Scott-Fordsmand JJ, Amorim MJ. Oxidative stress mechanisms caused by Ag nanoparticles (NM300K) are different from those of AgNO3: effects in the soil invertebrate Enchytraeus crypticus. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:9589–9602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120809589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wang J, et al. Phytostimulation of poplars and Arabidopsis exposed to silver nanoparticles and Ag+ at sublethal concentrations. Environ. Sci. Teechnol. 2013;47:5442–5449. doi: 10.1021/es4004334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Misra, P. et al. Nanotechnology for crop improvement. In Plant Nanotechnology (eds. Kole, C., Kumar, S. D. & Khodakovskaya, M. V.) 219–256 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).
- 68.Liu R, Zhang H, Lal R. Effects of stabilized nanoparticles of copper, zinc, manganese, and iron oxides in low concentrations on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seed germination: nanotoxicants or nanonutrients? Water Air Soil Poll. 2016;227:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11270-015-2689-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kumar SJ, Prasad SR, Banerjee R, Thammineni C. Seed birth to death: dual functions of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. Ann.Bot. 2015;116:663–668. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yin G, et al. Activity levels and expression of antioxidant enzymes in the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in artificially aged rice seed. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014;80:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bailly C, El-Maarouf-Bouteau H, Corbineau F. From intracellular signaling networks to cell death: the dual role of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. C. R. Biol. 2008;331:806–814. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Leymarie J, et al. Role of reactive oxygen species in the regulation of Arabidopsis seed dormancy. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:96–106. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wojtyla Ł, Lechowska K, Kubala S, Garnczarska M. Different modes of hydrogen peroxide action during seed germination. Front. Plant. Sci. 2016;7 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bailly C. Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology. Seed Sci. Res. 2004;14:93–107. doi: 10.1079/SSR2004159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kibinza S, et al. Catalase is a key enzyme in seed recovery from ageing during priming. Plant Sci. 2011;181:309–315. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Khodakovskaya MV, et al. Complex genetic, photothermal, and photoacoustic analysis of nanoparticle-plant interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:1028–1033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008856108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Müller K, et al. In vivo cell wall loosening by hydroxyl radicals during cress seed germination and elongation growth. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1855–1865. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.139204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Richards SL, et al. The hydroxyl radical in plants: from seed to seed. J. Exp. Bot. 2015;66:37–46. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Liu S, Oshita S, Kawabata S, Makino Y, Yoshimoto T. Identification of ROS produced by nanobubbles and their positive and negative effects on vegetable seed germination. Langmuir. 2016;32:11295–11302. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gomes MP, Garcia QS. Reactive oxygen species and seed germination. Biologia. 2013;68:351–357. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ernest V, Shiny P, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Silver nanoparticles: a potential nanocatalyst for the rapid degradation of starch hydrolysis by α-amylase. Carbohydr. Res. 2012;352:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Misson M, Zhang H, Jin B. Nanobiocatalyst advancements and bioprocessing applications. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2015;12 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Deka J, Paul A, Chattopadhyay A. Modulating enzymatic activity in the presence of gold nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2012;2:4736–4745. doi: 10.1039/c2ra20056b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Salunke BK, et al. Potential of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles as nanocatalyst for enhanced degradation of cellulose by cellulase. J. Nanomater. 2015;2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/289410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ellis R, Roberts E. The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 1981;9:373–409. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Feizi H, Kamali M, Jafari L, Moghaddam PR. Phytotoxicity and stimulatory impacts of nanosized and bulk titanium dioxide on fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill) Chemosphere. 2013;91:506–511. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bhardwaj J, Anand A, Nagarajan S. Biochemical and biophysical changes associated with magnetopriming in germinating cucumber seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012;57:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Singh HP, et al. Nitric oxide alleviates arsenic toxicity by reducing oxidative damage in the roots of Oryza sativa (rice) Nitric Oxide. 2009;20:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2009.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bernfeld, P. Amylases, alpha and beta.In Methods in Enzymology I (eds. Colowick, S. P. & Kaplan, N. O.) 149–158 (Academic Press, 1955).
- 90.Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959;31:426–428. doi: 10.1021/ac60147a030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers P, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956;28:350–356. doi: 10.1021/ac60111a017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Patterson BD, MacRae EA, Ferguson IB. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV) Anal. Biochem. 1984;139:487–492. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Elstner EF, Heupel A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Analytical biochemistry. 1976;70:616–620. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90488-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Bailly, C. & Kranner, I. Analyses of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in relation to seed longevity and germination. Seed Dormancy: Methods and Protocols 343–367 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 95.Chen B-X, et al. Involvement of polyamine oxidase-produced hydrogen peroxide during coleorhiza-limited germination of rice seeds. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Thuesombat P, Hannongbua S, Akasit S, Chadchawan S. Effect of silver nanoparticles on rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML 105) seed germination and seedling growth. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe. 2014;104:302–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Jeong, M. S. et al. Methodological considerations of electron spin resonance spin trapping techniques for measuring reactive oxygen species generated from metal oxide nanomaterials. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 98.Sakurai J, Ishikawa F, Yamaguchi T, Uemura M, Maeshima M. Identification of 33 rice aquaporin genes and analysis of their expression and function. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46:1568–1577. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Nounjan N, Nghia PT, Theerakulpisut P. Exogenous proline and trehalose promote recovery of rice seedlings from salt-stress and differentially modulate antioxidant enzymes and expression of related genes. J.Plant Physiol. 2012;169:596–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.