Erratum
Upon publication of the original article [1], it was noted that data submitted by the authors was accidentally omitted during typesetting. The following section of the submitted manuscript was wrongfully omitted from the Methods section in the published article [1]:
Availability of data and materials
All iCLIP data that were newly generated for this manuscript are made available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/ via accession numbers E-MTAB-5027 (PTBP1-iCLIP2), E-MTAB-5026 (PTBP1-iCLIP3), E-MTAB-3618 (eIF4A3-iCLIP2) and E-MTAB-4000 (eIF4A3-iCLIP3).
This has now been acknowledged and corrected in this erratum.
The publisher apologises for these errors.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1130-x.
Contributor Information
Kathi Zarnack, Email: kathi.zarnack@bmls.de.
Jernej Ule, Email: j.ule@ucl.ac.uk.
Reference
- 1.Haberman N, Huppertz I, Attig J, König J, Wang Z, Hauer C, Hentze MW, Kulozik AE, Le Hir H, Curk T, Sibley CR. Insights into the design and interpretation of iCLIP experiments. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1130-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All iCLIP data that were newly generated for this manuscript are made available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/ via accession numbers E-MTAB-5027 (PTBP1-iCLIP2), E-MTAB-5026 (PTBP1-iCLIP3), E-MTAB-3618 (eIF4A3-iCLIP2) and E-MTAB-4000 (eIF4A3-iCLIP3).
This has now been acknowledged and corrected in this erratum.
The publisher apologises for these errors.