Abstract
Several β2-microglobulin (B2M) -bound protein complexes undertake key roles in various immune system pathways, including the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), cluster of differentiation 1 (CD1) protein, non-classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC), and well-known MHC class I molecules. Therefore, the duplication of B2M may lead to an increase in the biological competence of organisms to the environment. Based on the pig genome assembly SSC10.2, a segmental duplication of ~45.5 kb, encoding the entire B2M protein, was identified in pig chromosome 1. Through experimental validation, we confirmed the functional duplication of the B2M gene with a completely identical coding sequence between two copies in pigs. Considering the importance of B2M in the immune system, we performed the phylogenetic analysis of B2M duplication in ten mammalian species, confirming the presence of B2M duplication in cetartioldactyls, like cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and whales, but non-cetartiodactyl species, like mice, cats, dogs, horses, and humans. The density of long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) at the edges of duplicated blocks (39 to 66%) was found to be 2 to 3-fold higher than the average (20.12%) of the pig genome, suggesting its role in the duplication event. The B2M mRNA expression level in pigs was 12.71 and 7.57 times (2-ΔΔCt values) higher than humans and mice, respectively. However, we were unable to experimentally demonstrate the difference in the level of B2M protein because species specific anti-B2M antibodies are not available. We reported, for the first time, the functional duplication of the B2M gene in animals. The identification of partially remaining duplicated B2M sequences in the genomes of only cetartiodactyls indicates that the event was lineage specific. B2M duplication could be beneficial to the immune system of pigs by increasing the availability of MHC class I light chain protein, B2M, to complex with the proteins encoded by the relatively large number of MHC class I heavy chain genes in pigs. Further studies are necessary to address the biological meaning of increased expression of B2M.
Introduction
Gene duplications provide resources for the random mutation, genetic drift, and selection, leading to an increase in the biological competence of organisms to the changing environment by increasing the buffering capacity of their genomes [1]. They also contribute to the phenotypic variations of species or populations [2,3]. The reported examples of gene duplication include genes with diverse biological roles, such as stomach lysozyme [4], visual pigment genes [5], homeobox family [6], hemoglobin gamma [7], alcohol dehydrogenase [8], ion channel family [9], and growth hormone family [10]. In mammals, the other classical examples include the duplication and dramatic expansion of the olfactory receptor (OR) genes to sense chemicals and MHC genes to recognize pathogens from diverse environments [11–13].
The copy number variations (CNVs) of MHC genes also affect the disease response status of individuals. For instance, the association of CNVs in MHC class I genes with Marek’s disease resistance was reported in chicken [14]. Additionally, a duplication of the CIITA gene, which encodes a trans-activator of the MHC class II molecules, was associated with the increased resistance to ingested nematodes in cattle [15]. Variations in the genomic structure of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) due to the segmental duplications among haplotypes served as an important source of genetic diversity in relation to diseases [16].
β2-microglobulin, a protein with a molecular weight of 11.8 kDa, is ubiquitously expressed in all nucleated cells and present in most of the biological fluids, including serum, urine, and synovial fluid, in vertebrates [17,18]. The secondary structure of B2M possesses the characteristics of the immunoglobulins with a classical β-sandwich, which consists of two β-sheets linked by a single disulfide bridge [19,20]. B2M functions as a light chain in the heterodimer complexes with MHC class I and MHC class I-like heavy chains by noncovalent linkage [19,21]. Several B2M-bound protein complexes undertake key roles in various immune system pathways, including the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) [22], cluster of differentiation 1 (CD1) protein [23], human hemochromatosis protein (HFE) [24], mouse Qa (non-classical MHC) [25], and most well-known MHC class I molecules [26].
Recently, certain levels of the free B2M in blood have been shown to be associated with several cancers [27,28], age-related cognitive dysfunction, and impairment of neurogenesis [29,30], viral infections [31], mortality and graft loss in transplantation [32], highlighting its extensive role of B2M in the biology of an individual.
The comparison of the B2M protein sequences of different species indicated that B2M does not show strong sequence conservation among species. The human B2M protein shares 70% sequential identity with that of mice [33]. Furthermore, interestingly, no intraspecific genetic polymorphisms have been observed in human B2M [34], suggesting that changes in the B2M protein sequence could be undesirable to the host.
Pigs have not only long been an important domestic animal, but also recently emerged as a potential model for medical research, especially in immunity and xenotransplantation studies because of its suitable organ size and similarity to human biological system [35–38]. In view of this, a pig genome project was undertaken by the international pig genome consortium [39–41]. However, considering that 33.07% of the pig genome assembly includes the low-coverage and low-quality regions, it is still required to further improve the accuracy of the pig reference genome (Sscrofa10.2) [42].
The functional duplication of the B2M gene has not been reported in mammals. In this study, we identified the complete sequence duplication of the B2M gene in pigs, and validated the phenomenon and functionality. We also investigated the phylogenetic origins of the B2M duplication in related animal species. Our results confirmed that the functional duplication of B2M occurs only in pigs, and discussed the event of B2M duplication in the context of evolution, speciation, and adaptive changes in pigs.
Methods
In silico analysis of sequence data
Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) analysis using pig B2M coding sequence (accession number, L13854.1) against the pig genome (Sscrofa10.2) revealed the presence of two genomic segments containing B2M in the genome. Based on the publicly available annotation of the pig genome assembly Sscrofa10.2 in the NCBI genome database [41], we performed a comparative analysis of the genetic structures of the duplication region among nine mammalian species described below. We found that the phylogenetically conserved EIF3J and TRIM69 genes flanked the identified duplication in the pig chromosome 1 (GenBank accession number NW_003609204). The 358.5-kb sequence corresponding to the EIF3J-TRIM69 interval was downloaded from the NCBI database with full features of the GenBank format from nine different species, including pigs (Sus scrofa, 358.5 kb, accession number NW_003609204: 388,903..738,903), mice (Mus musculus, 150.9 kb, NT_039207: 62,896,359..63,073,359), humans (Homo sapiens, 230.8 kb, NT_010194: 21,253,126..21,504,126), cats (Felis catus, 214.3 kb, NT_187881: 420,420..800,420), dogs (Canis lupus familiaris, 201.9 kb, NW_003726113: 11,200,900..11,438,900), horses (Equus caballus, 178.4 kb, NW_001867387: 77,431,718..77,620,718), sheep (Ovis aries, 213.8 kb, NW_004080170: 99,778,000..100,000,000), goats (Capra hircus, 211.5 kb, NW_005100768: 7,424,851..8,164,851), and cattle (Bos taurus, 214.3 kb, NT_187881: 420,420..800,420). Subsequently, these sequences were subjected to dot-plot analysis using the Gepard program (version 1.4) [43] to identify the relative positions and sizes of the duplicated blocks. Sequence alignments were performed using ClustalX embedded in the CLC Main Workbench (version 7.8.1) (CLCbio, Qiagen, Aarhus, Denmark). A multiple alignment for the syntenic comparison was carried out using the progressiveMauve program [44]. The analysis of the repetitive elements was carried out using the RepeatMasker Web Server with a sliding window of 10 kb [45]. For phylogenetic analysis, a sequence alignment with 11 full-length amino acid sequences of B2M from 10 species including human, mouse, cat, dog, horse, sheep, goat, cattle, pig and whale was generated using CLC Main Workbench software. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using MEGA 6.0 software [46], and trees were constructed using Maximum Likelihood method based on Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model [47] with a bootstrap test of 1000 replicates.
Cell culture
Cell lines, including HEK-293T (human embryo kidney, CRL-3216), PK13 (pig kidney of Hampshire breed, CRL-6489), and NIH3T3 (mouse embryo fibroblast, CRL-1658) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The cells were cultured in DMEM/high glucose media (Hyclone, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (Hyclone), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, NY, USA), and 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), and 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Preparation of DNA and RNA
To prepare genomic DNA, cells were trypsinized, collected, and subjected to DNA extraction. Briefly, cells were suspended in a lysis buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 0.1 M EDTA] containing 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 20 μl of 20 mg/ml proteinase K (Promega, WI, USA) and incubated at 55°C for 6 h. The supernatant was purified with phenol/chloroform extraction, and the resulting DNA pellets were obtained by alcohol precipitation. The total RNA was extracted from cells using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA). To extract total RNA from pig tissues, 1 ml of Trizol was added to approximately 100 mg of sample, and the tissues were homogenized. The purification step was conducted using RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantification of nucleic acids was carried out using NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, DE, USA), and their integrity was checked by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel in 1X Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light.
Genomic Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCRs)
To amplify the duplicated regions of B2M with sequence variations, the primers were designed for the conserved B2M intron-2 region (universal primer, UniblockAB-F) and the variable exon 4 (copy-specific primers, BlockA-R3 and BlockB-R), which can produce amplicons containing sequences from the partial B2M intron 2 to the downstream region of exon 4 from both copies of the B2M gene in the pig genome. The detailed information of the primers is presented in Table 1. Amplification reactions were performed in 50 μl containing 50 ng genomic DNA, 1 μM of each primer, 1.6 mM dNTPs, 1X PCR buffer (containing 2.5 mM MgCl2), and 2.5 U of LA Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) using a T3000 Thermocycler (Biometra, Goettingen, Germany). The cycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 53°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. For genomic PCRs with other primers, identical cycling conditions were used, except specific annealing temperatures used for each primer set (Tables 1 and 2). The semi-quantitative PCR for the B2M and PATL2 genes was carried out to compare the band intensities of the amplicons for each B2M exon, exon 1 (gB2M-e1F and gB2M-i1R), exon 2 (gB2M-i1F and gB2M-e2R), and exon 3 (UniblockAB-F and gB2M-i3R), and PATL2 exon 4 (gPATL2-i3F and gPATL2-i4R) to that of GCG exon 4 (gGCG-i3F and gGCG-e4R), a single copy gene. The PCR conditions were identical to those described above, except that the number of cycles was reduced to 23. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel in 1X TEA buffer.
Table 1. Primers used for semi-quantitative PCR and examination of the sequence variation between duplicated block A and B.
Targets | Template | Primer name | Sequence (5' - 3') | Annealing temprature (°C) | Product size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Block-A | genomic | UniblockAB-F | CCTAACAAGGCGCTCATGGTC | 62 | 1724 |
BlockA-R3 | GGGCTGCTCCCCCGGCA | ||||
Block-B | genomic | UniblockAB-F | CCTAACAAGGCGCTCATGGTC | 62 | 1782 |
BlockB-R | GAGGAGTTTCACTCTTGTCCGAG | ||||
long-B2M | cDNA | B2M-F1 | TTCArGTwTACTCACGyCAyCCA | 53 | 281 (278 in pig) |
B2M-R | TyAswkGTCTCGATCCCA | ||||
long-GAPDH | cDNA | GAPDH-F1 | CATCACCATCTTCCAGGA | 53 | 476 |
GAPDH-R1 | CCATGCCAGTGAGCTTC |
Note: Lower case letters for nucleotide sequences indicate the degenerated nucleotides.
Table 2. Primers used for quantitative PCR of the β2-microglobulin gene.
Targets | Template | Primer name | Sequence (5' - 3') | Annealing temprature (oC) | Product size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
short-B2M | cDNA | B2M-F2 | CAGCAAGGACTGGTCTTTCTA | 53 | 133 |
B2M-R | TyAswkGTCTCGATCCCA | ||||
short-GAPDH | cDNA | GAPDH-F2 | CCTGGCCAAGGTCATCCA | 53 | 123 |
GAPDH-R2 | CGGCCATCACGCCACAG | ||||
gB2M -exon 1 | genomic | gB2M-i0F | GCCGAGCTCTCATTCCACC | 60 | 150 |
gB2M-i1R | GGCTGGTAGAAGAGGGAAGAGG | ||||
gB2M-exon 2 | genomic | gB2M-i1F | CTTTCCTTGATGTTCCTCAG | 60 | 198 |
gB2M-e2R | TAGAAAGACCAGTCCTTGCTG | ||||
gB2M-exon 3 | genomic | UniblockAB-F | CCTAACAAGGCGCTCATGGTC | 60 | 257 |
gB2M-i3R | CTGCAGACAGTGAGTGCCAG | ||||
gPATL2-exon 4 | genomic | gPATL2-i3F | CCTGGGTTTTCCTCCCTCC | 60 | 210 |
gPATL2-i4R | GTCAAGAGCAGACTGCATGTC | ||||
gGCG-exon 4 | genomic | gGCG-i3F | GCCACTGCTTATAGGTGAGAACC | 60 | 206 |
gGCG-e4R | GCCTTCCTCGGCCTTTCA |
Note: Lower case letters for nucleotide sequences indicate the degenerated nucleotides.
cDNA synthesis and RT-PCR
cDNA synthesis was performed in a 25-μl reaction using 5 μg of the total RNA, 50 ng of oligo-(dT)15 and SuperScript III ReverseTranscriptase (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. The universal primers, B2M-F1 and B2M-R, which are located at the beginning of the exon 2 and at the end of exons 2 and 3, respectively, were designed for the semi-quantitative amplification of the B2M transcripts from human, mouse, and pig cells against the most conserved region across species while having degeneration at a few nucleotides showing variations among species (Table 1, S1 Fig). For control, GAPDH (GAPDH-F1 and R1) was used (Table 1). Amplifications were performed in 20-μl reactions containing 1 μl synthesized cDNA, 0.5 μM of primers specific for each gene, 200 μM dNTPs, 1X PCR buffer [10 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl], and 0.5 U of Super-Therm DNA polymerase (JMR Holdings, Kent, UK) using a T3000 Thermocycler (Biometra). The thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 26 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 s, annealing at 53°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel in 1X Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer.
Direct sequencing
PCR products were gel-purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Direct sequencing reactions were carried out using ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) using 2 μl of the eluted PCR products with the same primers as in PCR reactions (Table 1). The products were analyzed on an 3730XL automated DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystem).
Real-time PCR
Primer sets used to estimate the expression levels of mRNA via real-time PCR are described in Table 2 and S1 Fig. Reactions to compare the expression levels of B2M and GAPDH were performed in 25-μl containing 1 μl of synthesized cDNA, 0.25 μM of species nonspecific B2M primers (B2M-F2 and B2M-R) or GAPDH (GAPDH-F2 and GAPDH-R2) together with 1X solution of Rotor-Gene TM SYBR R Green PCR kit (Qiagen) using CFX ConnectTM Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, CA, US). The thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 s, annealing at 53°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 20 s, followed by a final extension at 72° for 5 min. The following primer sets were used to estimate the gene copy number from genomic DNA using real-time PCR: gB2M-i0F and gB2M-i1R for B2M exon 1, gB2M-i1F and gB2M-e2R for B2M exon 2, uniblockAB-F and gB2M-i3R for B2M exon 3, gPATL2-i3F and gPATL2-i4R for PATL2 exon 4, and gGCG-i3F and gGCG-e4R for GCG exon 4. The PCR conditions were the same as with above-mentioned cDNA amplification, except 60°C annealing temperature. The results were evaluated four times for each amplicon. The PCR results were analyzed by Bio-Rad CFX Manager, version 3.1 (Bio-Rad). The 2-ΔΔCt method was used for the relative quantification to determine the expression level or gene copy numbers [48]. The PCR efficiencies of real-time PCR primers for B2M expression of each species were calculated from standard curve of serial 10-fold dilution (4 dilutions) amplifications for each type of cDNA (S2A, S2B and S2C Fig). P-values were calculated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons of means were performed using Tukey’s test embedded in the basic R program (version 3.2.3).
Expression constructs and transfection
A complete coding sequence of the B2M gene was amplified from the total RNA of PK13 pig kidney cells (ATCC, CRL-6489) using primers, EcoRI-Linker-B2M-F (5′-AAA GAA TTC CGA GTG GTG GTT CGG CTC CCC TCG TG GCCT-3′) and B2M-HIS-SalI-R (5′-AAA GTC GAC TTA GTG GTG ATG GTG ATG ATG GTG GTC TCG ATC CCA-3′) by RT-PCR. The amplification reactions were performed in 25-μl reaction volume containing 1 μl of synthesized cDNA, 0.5 μM each of primers, 200 μM dNTPs, 1X PCR buffer, and 0.5 U of Pyrobest DNA polymerase (Takara) using a T3000 Thermocycler (Biometra). The thermal cycling conditions included initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 20 s, annealing at 56°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were gel-purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The amplicon was ligated into the pCMV-HA-N vector (Clontech, CA, USA) to generate pCMV-HA-B2M-His construct after double digestion with EcoRI and SalI restriction enzymes. The ligation products were transfected into DH10B cells (Invitrogen) using MicroPulser (Biorad, CA, USA). The transformed bacteria were plated on agar containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin. Five colonies were picked for each construct, and the plasmids were isolated from 3-ml cultures using Plasmid SV Miniprep Kit (GeneAll Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea). The absence of mutations in the constructs were confirmed by sequence analysis of the inserts using pCMV-HA-N-F (5′-CTC AGT GGA TGT TGC CTT-3′) and pCMV-HA-N-R (5′-AAA AAC CTC CCA CAC CTC-3′) as forward and reverse sequencing primers, respectively. The plasmids were transfected into the PK13 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) according to the manufacture’s protocol.
Immunocytochemistry
Lung fibroblasts, which express a low level of swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) class I [49], were obtained as a kind gift from Dr. Jin-Hoi Kim, Konkuk University. The cells were seeded on glass coverslips (Warner Instruments, CT, USA) in a 6-well plate at a density of 1.2 × 105 cells/well. On day 2, approximately 80% confluent cells were transfected with expression constructs, pCMV-HA, pCMV-B2M, or pEGFP, as described above. After 24 h, cover slips with attached cells were washed with cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were washed with cold PBS before blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were incubated with rabbit monoclonal antibodies specific to HA tags (dilution 1:250, clone C29F4; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) or mouse monoclonal antibodies specific to SLA class I heavy chains (dilution 1:200, clone JM1E3; AbD Serotec, OX, UK) for 2 h at room temperature. After rinsing with cold PBS, cells were incubated with the goat anti-mouse/anti-rabbit antibody (1:500) conjugated with Alexa 568 (Invitrogen) for 1 h at room temperature, and the coverslips were mounted with a drop of Vectashield (with DAPI) (Vector, CA, USA) on a microscope slide. The cells were visualized using a fluorescence microscope DP72 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)
Lung fibroblasts transfected with expression constructs, pCMV-HA or pCMV-B2M, were collected after culturing for 24 h after transfection, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and incubated with mouse monoclonal primary antibodies specific for SLA class I (1:250 dilution, clone JM1E3; AbD Serotec). Cells were washed, and subsequently incubated with goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:500) conjugated with Alexa 568 (Invitrogen) for 1 h on ice in dark. Cells were washed, resuspended in cold PBS, and analyzed using FACSCanto II flow cytometer and FACSDiva program version 6.1.3 (BDbiosciences, NJ, USA). The experiments were replicated twice. The pEGFP-transfected cells were used as control.
Results
Structural analysis of the 358.5-kb B2M flanking region in the current pig genome assembly
Examining the gene annotations of the current pig genome assembly (Sscrofa10.2), we detected an unexpected segmental duplication in the long arm of chromosome 1, including the B2M gene previously mapped to SSC1q17 without knowing the duplication [50]. For detailed characterization, a dot-plot analysis was performed on the selected region of the pig genome between the EIF3J and TRIM69 genes (accession number, NW_003609204: 388,903–738,903). The results showed the presence of a segmental duplication with two identical blocks of 45.5 kb, which were separated by a gene fragment of 34.9 kb (Fig 1). In the current pig genome assembly, the 358.5-kb EIF3J-TRIM69 interval comprises five genes, including EIF3J, SPG11, PATL2, B2M, and TRIM69. Moreover, this region was found to be highly evolutionarily conserved among other mammals. We named the two duplicated blocks as blocks A (NW_003609204.1, nucleotide position 553,595–599,255 and B (649,075–694,753), as indicated in Fig 1. The sequence alignment between the two duplicated blocks of 45.5 kb revealed the sequence identity of 99.4%, with major dissimilarity located in the exon 4 of the partial SPG11 gene, downstream of the PATL2 gene, and exon 4 of the B2M gene (Fig 2).
Validation of the B2M duplication by genomic sequence analysis and real-time PCR
From the comparison of the 45.5-kb genomic sequences between the duplicated and original copies of the B2M gene containing blocks from the pig genome assembly Sscrofa10.2, we identified the regions showing nucleotide variations. Using the primers specific for the region displaying sequence differences between the two copies of B2M, which is located between the intron 2 and the downstream region of B2M exon 4, we amplified the B2M locus-specific amplicons of 1724 and 1782 bp for blocks A and B, respectively, from the genomic DNA prepared from a pig cell line PK13 (data not shown). The results from the direct sequencing of the two B2M amplicons showed similarity to the current pig genome assembly, and were mapped into two expected regions (Fig 2).
In addition, we carried out the semi-quantitative PCR against the entire coding region of the B2M (three amplicons from exon 1, 2 and 3) and PATL2 (exon 4) genes, using the pig genomic DNA to estimate their copy numbers in the pig genome and GCG as a control for the single copy gene. The result showed that the band intensity of all three amplicons of B2M was relatively higher than that of the single copy control gene, even when considering the differences in fragment size (S3B Fig). However, the band intensity of PATL2 amplicons did not support the duplication of PATL2 in the pig genome. These observations were further confirmed by the results of the subsequent real-time PCR, by which the estimated copy numbers of the B2M exons 1, 2, and 3 were calculated to be 1.51, 1.36, and 1.97 times, respectively, as compared to GCG, and 2.12, 1.9 and 2.77 times, respectively, as compared to PATL2 (P < 0.0001, S1 Table). The copy numbers of the B2M exons 1 and 2 were slightly lower than that of the exon 3 because of the difference in their product sizes and amplification efficiency compared to the control GCG; however, the combined results from all three exons clearly showed the presence of an extra copy of B2M. Considering that no genetic polymorphisms have been reported in the human B2M gene, and that we also did not observe any polymorphisms in the pig B2M gene from our analysis using public databases and sequencing results of the B2M exon 2, the largest exon, from one animal each of the seven pig breeds (data not shown), it was less likely that the detected variations were allelic. Therefore, we confirmed the genomic duplication of B2M in pigs both by analyzing the sequence variation between the two copies of B2M and by estimating the copy number using the real-time PCR. However, our results indicated that the duplication of PATL2 in the genome assembly Sscrofa10.2 was due to the assembly errors.
Functional validation of B2M duplication in pigs by comparing the levels of B2M mRNA among humans, mice, and pigs
To evaluate whether the expression level of B2M mRNA in pigs was relatively higher than that of the other species with a single copy of B2M, we amplified the B2M gene by both semi-quantitative PCR and real-time PCR, using cDNA from the human, mice, and pig cell lines (Fig 3, S3A Fig, S2 Table). In semi-quantitative PCR, the band intensity was significantly higher in pigs than the other animals. Furthermore, the expression level of B2M mRNA in pigs was significantly different from humans and mice as shown by the real-time PCR (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, the B2M expression level in pigs was 12.71 and 7.56 times (2-ΔΔCt values) higher than humans and mice, respectively, which could not be explained only by the difference in their gene copy numbers. This result indicates that there could be an additional mechanism for the transcriptional control of the B2M gene in pigs because of the biological importance and evolutionary need of the B2M gene for this species. The higher level of B2M expression was also confirmed on pig tissues including the small intestine and kidney (S4 Fig).
The amplification efficiency of the B2M gene among different species might be different because of the bias from the sequence variations among different species. However, we attempted to overcome this bias by using a pair of universal primers with a few degenerate nucleotides for the amplification of B2M from different species after carefully considering the patterns of nucleotide variations. Our results suggested that both gene duplication and transcriptional regulation contribute to the increased levels of B2M transcripts in pig cells, which might lead to a beneficial effect on the immune system of pigs. Because of the complete sequence identity in the exonal region between ancestral and duplicated copies of B2M, differentiation of expression level between the two copies was not possible. We assumed that the expression of both copies of B2M contribute to higher B2M expression in pigs comparing to the species with a single B2M such as humans and mice.
Over-expression of HA-tagged B2M mRNA did not correlate with enhanced expression of SLA class I complexes on the cell surface
An increase in the levels of B2M proteins could affect the consequences of immune reactions in response to pathogenic infections. To understand the relationship between the expression level of HA-tagged B2M mRNA and the number of MHC proteins presented on the cell surface, we analyzed the changes in the HA signal intensity on the cell surface of the cells transfected with HA-tagged B2M. Although the formation of a functional MHC class I complex between 6xHis-tagged B2M and HLA class I genes has been previously reported [51], the complex formation between the HA-tagged recombinant B2M and MHC class I molecules has not been reported yet. The immunocytochemical analysis using HA specific antibodies showed clear signals on the surface of transfected cells, indicating that the HA-tagged recombinant B2M also properly forms complexes with SLA class I molecules (S5 Fig). Therefore, we estimated changes in the expression of MHC molecules on the surface of primary lung fibroblast cells transfected with HA-tagged B2M by measuring the level of both HA and SLA class I signals using antibodies specific for HA and SLA class I heavy chains, respectively (Fig 4). However, no significant change was observed in the number of SLA class I molecules presented on the surface of cells overexpressing HA-tagged B2M (Fig 4b). This observation was supported by the FACS results, which showed almost no changes in the SLA class I expression on the surface of cells transfected with and without the B2M coding sequence. In fact, the cells transfected with pCMV-HA-B2M showed slightly lower signals of SLA class I molecules (79.9 and 74.1%, obtained from two experiments) than the cells transfected with pCMV-HA (80 and 80.1%) (S6 Fig). This result suggested that the HA tag fused to B2M might negatively influence the efficient formation of a B2M-SLA I complex. However, further studies are required to address this issue.
Comparisons of genetic structures for the EIF3J-TRIM69 syntenic region among different species
To understand the evolutionary aspects of B2M duplication, we compared the annotations of the EIF3J-TRIM69 interval from the publicly available genome information among diverse species including the closely related artiodactyls, such as cattle, goats, and sheep, and more distantly related horses, dogs, cats, mice, and humans together with pigs. The comparison showed that the genetic structure of EIF3J-TRIM69 interval was highly conserved among different species, except for the slight difference in their sizes (Fig 5). The conserved segments in all species, except pigs, were in the same order without any significant rearrangements. Surprisingly, the size of the EIF3J-TRIM69 interval was greatly expanded in pigs. Our real-time PCR results for the copy number estimation of PATL2 showed conflict with its structure in the current pig genome assembly (S3B and S4C Figs). In addition, we were unable to validate the interruption of SPG11 in pigs because the specific amplicons were amplified from reverse transcription (RT) PCR using primers specific to the break point of SPG11 gene, including the intervals of exons 15 and 17, and 22 and 23, which should not be amplified if the gene configuration in the current pig genome assembly is correct (data not shown). Therefore, our experimental validation showed inconsistency between the information in the current pig genome assembly and our experimental data.
Occurrence of B2M duplication in the cetartiodactyl lineage and intactness only in pigs
To assess the evolutionary history of B2M duplication event in animal species, we analyzed the presence of sequences corresponding to the B2M gene or the remnant in the syntenic region from the EIF3J-TRIM69 interval from each of the nine other species using BLAST. Interestingly, we found the additional presence of partial sequences of exons 3 to 4 of B2M in sheep, goats, and cattle. The size and level of sequence similarity varied from 1.2 kb (99% identity) in sheep to 0.3 kb (99%) in goat and 1 kb (100%) in cattle. In addition, we identified the partial duplication of a 943-bp fragment corresponding to a region from the middle of intron 3 to the end of exon 4 of B2M from the Scaffold 142 (Oorc_1.1, ID: NW_004438556.1) of the genome sequence of a killer whale (Orcinus orca). More interestingly, we found a retro-transposition event containing a complete protein coding region of B2M on Scaffold 53 (Oorc_1.1, ID: NW_004438467) from the genome of O. orca. The retrogene sequence showed high similarity (87.3% identical) to the coding sequence of whale B2M, but lacked two amino acids (S7 Fig). This retrogene cannot be an artifact because we also found the same retrogene from the sperm whale genome (Physeter_macrocephalus-2.0.2 Scaffold 4325, ID: NW_006717073.1). However, the gene is possibly nonfunctional because we were not able to detect the corresponding sequence in the available gene expression data of the O. orca from the NCBI RNA RefSeq database.
This observation suggests that the duplication event of B2M is common in cetartiodactyl species. However, we were unable to reconstruct the detailed structure of the EIF3J-TRIM69 interval because of the limited information of the whale genome. The locations of the partially duplicated B2M sequences for the corresponding species, except for whale, are indicated in Fig 5. The presence of the partially duplicated sequence of B2M was not observed in species out of cetartiodactyla such as mice, humans, cats, dogs, and horses. This is in agreement with the phylogenetic relationship of the species constructed by amino acid sequences of the B2M gene, in which artiodactyl species formed a distinct cluster from the remaining species (Fig 6).
Discussion
B2M is an essential protein with diverse biological roles, and therefore the genetic variations or mutations of the gene could result in biologically significant differences in the related phenotypes. In this study, we confirmed the presence of the double dose of the intact B2M gene in pigs with the identical coding sequence and that the remnant of B2M duplication is present in all analyzed cetartiodactyl species.
We were unable to confirm the effect of the B2M gene duplication on the level of protein expression and compare it among different species because of the unavailability of the “special” antibody, which is equally reactive to the B2M of different species. However, our results showed that the over expression of HA-tagged B2M might differ from the endogenous B2M without tags (Fig 4, S5 Fig), preventing a clear conclusion on this. Although we were not able to observe an increase in the cell surface expression of SLA class I molecules in the cells overexpressing HA-tagged B2M, it was possible that the actual expression level of SLA class I molecules from the two copies of B2M genes in pig cells was higher than the other species with a single copy of B2M.
In addition to the possible structural alteration of B2M by the addition of HA tags, the expression of MHC class I can also be regulated through the mechanism of MHC class I assembly and translocation to the cell surface. Besides B2M, the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), tapasin, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) oxido-reductase ERp57, protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), the lectin chaperones, calnexin and calreticulin, and the ER aminopeptidase (ERAP) play important roles in the multilevel antigen presentation pathway machinery and have an effect on the expression level of SLA class I molecules [52]. Moreover, the upregulation of a single component can enhance MHC class I expression as in the case of ERAP1 protein [53]. Therefore, the double dose of endogenous B2M is likely to enhance the capacity of the pig immune system.
Several mechanisms have been suggested for the chromosomal rearrangements. Largely, the outcomes of genetic recombination might sometimes lead to segment duplication [54–57]. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) can lead to DNA recombination by double-strand break repair, which requires very short or no sequence homology [58,59]. In contrast, the non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is involved in generating the recurrent copy-number variations through homologous recombination between repeated sequences [60]. We examined the composition of the repeat elements in the EIF3J-TRIM69 interval (Fig 7), and found that the short-length repeat elements, such as short interspersed nuclear element (SINE) and Alu repeats, showed negligible presence (data not shown). However, the density of long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE) located at the edges of duplicated blocks was 2 to 3-fold higher (39 to 66%) than the average (20.12%), suggesting its role in the duplication event; however, the assembly information for this region needs further improvement. This phenomenon was consistent with the mouse chromosomal architecture in which a high content of LINEs and long terminal repeats (LTRs) were present within the boundaries of large duplication clusters [61,62]. Moreover, it was reported that the cetartiodactyl-specific evolutionary breakpoint regions (EBRs) are enriched for the LINE elements [41,63]. This suggested that the B2M segmental duplication might occur through the participation of repeat elements, especially LINEs.
In the early evolution of vertebrates (gnathostomata), the B2M gene was assumed to have translocated from its original location within the MHC region to a diverse chromosome location among vertebrate species by the activation of tandem duplication [64]. In zebrafish, the presence of an additional, although nonfunctional, B2M locus with approximately 60% amino acid similarity to its paralogue is consistent with the hypothesis of the recent genome-wide duplication in teleost fish [64]. Therefore, the B2M duplication in zebrafish differs from that in cetartiodactyla.
Among the cetartiodactyl species analyzed in this study, only pigs retained the completely duplicated B2M gene with an almost identical sequence, including the promoter and gene body regions. The presence of the remnant partial sequences of the duplicated B2M next to the intact version in the other cetartiodactyl species suggests that the duplication event of the B2M block occurred in the ancestor of cetartiodactyls. Subsequently, the vertical evolution caused the divergence of B2M shown in different species as well as the inactivation of an extra copy of the B2M in the other artiodactyls.
The increased dosage of B2M in pigs is intriguing because of the possible presence of a mechanism, which maintained and protected the duplicated copy from the pathways of neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization, or loss of function in this species. Changes in the B2M-related biological processes or behaviors of pig ancestors for adapting to environments might increase the need for maintaining an extra copy of B2M, and prevented the accumulation of variations in the duplicated paralogue.
In mammals, in addition to the odor receptor gene families [65], immune genes, especially MHC genes, show an extreme expansion across species for adaptation to pathogenic environments [11,13]. Recent analysis revealed that pigs have five classical (class Ia: SLA-1, -2, -3, -5, and -12) and four non-classical (class Ib: SLA-6, -7, -8, and -11) biologically functional SLA-I genes [41]. In humans, there are three class Ia genes (HLA-A, -B, and -C) and three class Ib genes (HLA-E, -F, and -G) [66–68]. Although the functions of diverse MHC genes in pigs are still not clear, a large number of heavy chains require relatively higher levels of B2M, to perform their realistic roles.
B2M also couples with other molecules to perform various functions. Similar in structure to the MHC class I molecules, the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) was reported to be associated with B2M for transporting IgG from the colostrum through the gut epithelium into the bloodstream of the neonate for short-term passive immunity [69–72]. The increased dose of B2M might benefit the immune protection of piglets. Melanoma is one of the most fatal skin cancers characterized by its aggressiveness and therapeutic resistivity [73]. One of the well-known pathways involves the reduction of antitumor response of the tumor-specific T cells through the alteration of MHC class I presentation on the malignant cells [74]. Studies have reported that one of the major causes of melanoma includes the loss-of-function mutations of B2M [75–77]. In several breeds of pigs including, Libechov minipig and Sinclair, the complete regression of melanoma has been reported [78–80]. It is tempting to hypothesize the association between B2M duplication and melanoma regression in pigs; however, we do not have any direct evidence to support this hypothesis. Furthermore, it has been reported that the pig chromosome 1 contains quantitative trait loci (QTL) for cutaneous melanoma, which were mapped near the B2M gene in the melanoblastoma-bearing Libechov minipig swine model [81].
Conclusion
We experimentally confirmed that the B2M gene is duplicated and remains functional in the chromosome 1 of pig genome. However, in the other cetartiodactyls analyzed in this study, the partial B2M duplication was observed. Changes in the B2M-related biological processes or behaviors of pig ancestors for adapting to environments might increase the need for maintaining an increased dose of B2M, and prevent the accumulation of variations even in the duplicated paralogue. In addition to serving as the light chain of MHC class I molecules, B2M plays diverse roles in the immune system of pigs; thus, the double dose of B2M could provide the benefits of increased fitness to pigs.
Supporting information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was financially supported by the grants from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ011130), the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (No. PJ009103), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2015R1A5A1009701), Republic of Korea.
References
- 1.Kondrashov FA (2012) Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment. Proc R Soc B: rspb20121108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bekaert M, Conant GC (2014) Gene Duplication and Phenotypic Changes in the Evolution of Mammalian Metabolic Networks. PLOS ONE 9: e87115 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Conrad B, Antonarakis SE (2007) Gene Duplication: A Drive for Phenotypic Diversity and Cause of Human Disease. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 8: 17–35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.8.021307.110233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Irwin DM, White RT, Wilson AC (1993) Characterization of the cow stomach lysozyme genes: repetitive DNA and concerted evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 37: 355–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yokoyama S, Yokoyama R (1989) Molecular evolution of human visual pigment genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 6: 186–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kappen C, Schughart K, Ruddle FH (1989) Two steps in the evolution of Antennapedia-class vertebrate homeobox genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 86: 5459–5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fitch DH, Bailey WJ, Tagle DA, Goodman M, Sieu L, Slightom JL (1991) Duplication of the gamma-globin gene mediated by L1 long interspersed repetitive elements in an early ancestor of simian primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88: 7396–7400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Long M, Langley CH (1993) Natural selection and the origin of jingwei, a chimeric processed functional gene in Drosophila. Science (New York, NY) 260: 91–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Strong M, Chandy KG, Gutman GA (1993) Molecular evolution of voltage-sensitive ion channel genes: on the origins of electrical excitability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 221–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ohta T (1993) Pattern of nucleotide substitutions in growth hormone-prolactin gene family: a paradigm for evolution by gene duplication. Genetics 134: 1271–1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Balakrishnan CN, Ekblom R, Völker M, Westerdahl H, Godinez R, Kotkiewicz H, et al. (2010) Gene duplication and fragmentation in the zebra finch major histocompatibility complex. BMC Biology 8: 29 doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Niimura Y, Nei M (2003) Evolution of olfactory receptor genes in the human genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 12235–12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ohtsuka M, Inoko H, Kulski JK, Yoshimura S (2008) Major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) class Ib gene duplications, organization and expression patterns in mouse strain C57BL/6. BMC Genomics 9: 178 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Luo J, Yu Y, Mitra A, Chang S, Zhang H, Liu G, et al. (2013) Genome-Wide Copy Number Variant Analysis in Inbred Chickens Lines With Different Susceptibility to Marek’s Disease. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics 3: 217–223. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.005132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu GE, Brown T, Hebert DA, Cardone MF, Hou Y, Choudhary RK, et al. (2011) Initial analysis of copy number variations in cattle selected for resistance or susceptibility to intestinal nematodes. Mammalian Genome 22: 111–121. doi: 10.1007/s00335-010-9308-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Traherne JA (2008) Human MHC architecture and evolution: implications for disease association studies. International Journal of Immunogenetics 35: 179–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-313X.2008.00765.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Drüeke TB, Massy ZA (2009) PROGRESS IN UREMIC TOXIN RESEARCH: Beta2-Microglobulin. Seminars in Dialysis 22: 378–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2009.00584.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Güssow D, Rein R, Ginjaar I, Hochstenbach F, Seemann G, Kottman A, et al. (1987) The human beta 2-microglobulin gene. Primary structure and definition of the transcriptional unit. The Journal of Immunology 139: 3132–3138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Becker JW, Reeke GN (1985) Three-dimensional structure of beta 2-microglobulin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82: 4225–4229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Verdone G, Corazza A, Viglino P, Pettirossi F, Giorgetti S, Mangione P, et al. (2002) The solution structure of human β2-microglobulin reveals the prodromes of its amyloid transition. Protein Science: A Publication of the Protein Society 11: 487–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li L, Dong M, Wang X-G (2016) The Implication and Significance of Beta 2 Microglobulin: A Conservative Multifunctional Regulator. Chinese Medical Journal 129: 448–455. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.176084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Simister NE, Ahouse JC (1996) The structure and evolution of FcRn. Research in Immunology 147: 333–337; discussion 353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zajonc DM, Elsliger MA, Teyton L, Wilson IA (2003) Crystal structure of CD1a in complex with a sulfatide self antigen at a resolution of 2.15 A. Nature Immunology 4: 808–815. doi: 10.1038/ni948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Waheed A, Parkkila S, Zhou XY, Tomatsu S, Tsuchihashi Z, Feder JN, et al. (1997) Hereditary hemochromatosis: Effects of C282Y and H63D mutations on association with β2-microglobulin, intracellular processing, and cell surface expression of the HFE protein in COS-7 cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 12384–12389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Robinson PJ, Travers PJ, Stackpoole A, Flaherty L, Djaballah H (1998) Maturation of Qa-1b Class I Molecules Requires β2-Microglobulin But Is TAP Independent. The Journal of Immunology 160: 3217–3224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bjorkman PJ, Saper MA, Samraoui B, Bennett WS, Strominger JL, Wiley DC (1987) Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2. Nature 329: 506–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mori M, Terui Y, Tanaka M, Tomizuka H, Mishima Y, Ikeda M, et al. (2001) Antitumor effect of beta2-microglobulin in leukemic cell-bearing mice via apoptosis-inducing activity: activation of caspase-3 and nuclear factor-kappaB. Cancer Research 61: 4414–4417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shi C, Zhu Y, Su Y, Chung LWK, Cheng T (2009) β2-Microglobulin: emerging as a promising cancer therapeutic target. Drug Discovery Today 14: 25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Annweiler C, Bataille R, Ferrière N, Douillet D, Fantino B, Beauchet O (2011) Plasma Beta-2 Microglobulin as a Marker of Frailty in Older Adults: A Pilot Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 66A: 1077–1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Smith LK, He Y, Park J-S, Bieri G, Snethlage CE, Lin K, et al. (2015) β2-microglobulin is a systemic pro-aging factor that impairs cognitive function and neurogenesis. Nature medicine 21: 932–937. doi: 10.1038/nm.3898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chitra P, Bakthavatsalam B, Palvannan T (2011) Beta-2 microglobulin as an immunological marker to assess the progression of human immunodeficiency virus infected patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clinica Chimica Acta 412: 1151–1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Astor BC, Muth B, Kaufman DB, Pirsch JD, Michael Hofmann R, Djamali A (2013) Serum β2-microglobulin at discharge predicts mortality and graft loss following kidney transplantation. Kidney International 84: 810–817. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cox DR, Sawicki JA, Yee D, Appella E, Epstein CJ (1982) Assignment of the gene for beta 2-microglobulin (B2m) to mouse chromosome 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79: 1930–1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Esposito G, Ricagno S, Corazza A, Rennella E, Gümral D, Mimmi MC, et al. (2008) The Controlling Roles of Trp60 and Trp95 in β2-Microglobulin Function, Folding and Amyloid Aggregation Properties. Journal of Molecular Biology 378: 887–897. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meurens F, Summerfield A, Nauwynck H, Saif L, Gerdts V (2012) The pig: a model for human infectious diseases. Trends in Microbiology 20: 50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vodicka P, Smetana K Jr., Dvoránková B, Emerick T, Xu YZ, Ourednik J, et al. (2005) The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1049: 161–171. doi: 10.1196/annals.1334.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schook L, Beattie C, Beever J, Donovan S, Jamison R, Zuckermann F, et al. (2005) Swine in biomedical research: creating the building blocks of animal models. Animal biotechnology 16: 183–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fischer K, Kraner-Scheiber S, Petersen B, Rieblinger B, Buermann A, Flisikowska T, et al. (2016) Efficient production of multi-modified pigs for xenotransplantation by ‘combineering’, gene stacking and gene editing. Scientific Reports 6: 29081 doi: 10.1038/srep29081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Archibald AL, Bolund L, Churcher C, Fredholm M, Groenen MAM, Harlizius B, et al. (2010) Pig genome sequence—analysis and publication strategy. BMC Genomics 11: 438 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Groenen MAM (2016) A decade of pig genome sequencing: a window on pig domestication and evolution. Genetics Selection Evolution 48: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Groenen MAM, Archibald AL, Uenishi H, Tuggle CK, Takeuchi Y, Rothschild MF, et al. (2012) Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 491: 393–398. doi: 10.1038/nature11622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Warr A, Robert C, Hume D, Archibald AL, Deeb N, Watson M (2015) Identification of Low-Confidence Regions in the Pig Reference Genome (Sscrofa10.2). Frontiers in Genetics 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Krumsiek J, Arnold R, Rattei T (2007) Gepard: a rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics 23: 1026–1028. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT (2010) progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5: e11147 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P (2013) RepeatMasker Open-4.0. http://wwwrepeatmaskerorg.
- 46.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Computer applications in the biosciences: CABIOS 8: 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 25: 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Roitt IM, Delves PJ (2006) Roitt's essential immunology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub; 474 p. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rogel-Gaillard C, Vaiman M, Renard C, Chardon P, Yerle M (1997) Localization of the beta2-microglobulin gene to pig Chromosome 1ql7. Mammalian Genome 8: 948–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tischer S, Kaireit T, Figueiredo C, Hiller O, Maecker-Kolhoff B, Geyeregger R, et al. (2012) Establishment of the reversible peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) class I Histamer technology: tool for visualization and selection of functionally active antigen-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes. International Immunology 24: 561–572. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxs059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Raghavan M, Cid ND, Rizvi SM, Peters LR (2008) MHC class I assembly: out and about. Trends in immunology 29: 436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2008.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang B, Niu D, Lai L, Ren EC (2013) p53 increases MHC class I expression by upregulating the endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase ERAP1. Nature Communications 4: 2359 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Magadum S, Banerjee U, Murugan P, Gangapur D, Ravikesavan R (2013) Gene duplication as a major force in evolution. Journal of Genetics 92: 155–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Reams AB, Roth JR (2015) Mechanisms of Gene Duplication and Amplification. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7: a016592 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Samonte RV, Eichler EE (2002) Segmental duplications and the evolution of the primate genome. Nature Reviews Genetics 3: 65–72. doi: 10.1038/nrg705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhang J (2003) Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 292–298. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lieber MR (2008) The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283: 1–5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R700039200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.McVey M, Lee SE (2008) MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends in genetics: TIG 24: 529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR (2002) Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends in genetics: TIG 18: 74–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bailey JA, Church DM, Ventura M, Rocchi M, Eichler EE (2004) Analysis of Segmental Duplications and Genome Assembly in the Mouse. Genome Research 14: 789–801. doi: 10.1101/gr.2238404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.She X, Cheng Z, Zöllner S, Church DM, Eichler EE (2008) Mouse Segmental Duplication and Copy-Number Variation. Nature genetics 40: 909–914. doi: 10.1038/ng.172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bovine Genome S, Analysis C, Elsik CG, Tellam RL, Worley KC, Gibbs RA, et al. (2009) The genome sequence of taurine cattle: a window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science (New York, NY) 324: 522–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ohta Y, Shiina T, Lohr RL, Hosomichi K, Pollin TI, Heist EJ, et al. (2011) Primordial Linkage of β2-Microglobulin to the MHC. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 186: 3563–3571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nguyen DT, Lee K, Choi H, Choi M-k, Le MT, Song N, et al. (2012) The complete swine olfactory subgenome: expansion of the olfactory gene repertoire in the pig genome. BMC Genomics 13: 584 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.O'Callaghan CA, Bell JI (1998) Structure and function of the human MHC class Ib molecules HLA-E, HLA-F and HLA-G. Immunological Reviews 163: 129–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Robinson J, Halliwell JA, Hayhurst JD, Flicek P, Parham P, Marsh SGE (2014) The IPD and IMGT/HLA database: allele variant databases. Nucleic Acids Research: gku1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shiina T, Hosomichi K, Inoko H, Kulski JK (2009) The HLA genomic loci map: expression, interaction, diversity and disease. Journal of Human Genetics 54: 15–39. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2008.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Burmeister WP, Gastinel LN, Simister NE, Blum ML, Bjorkman PJ (1994) Crystal structure at 2.2 Å resolution of the MHC-related neonatal Fc receptor. Nature 372: 336–343. doi: 10.1038/372336a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Burmeister WP, Huber AH, Bjorkman PJ (1994) Crystal structure of the complex of rat neonatal Fc receptor with Fc. Nature 372: 379–383. doi: 10.1038/372379a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Roopenian DC, Akilesh S (2007) FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age. Nature Reviews Immunology 7: 715–725. doi: 10.1038/nri2155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Simister NE, Mostov KE (1989) An Fc receptor structurally related to MHC class I antigens. Nature 337: 184–187. doi: 10.1038/337184a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Cummins DL, Cummins JM, Pantle H, Silverman MA, Leonard AL, Chanmugam A (2006) Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 81: 500–507. doi: 10.4065/81.4.500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Seliger B, Ritz U, Abele R, Bock M, Tampé R, Sutter G, et al. (2001) Immune Escape of Melanoma First Evidence of Structural Alterations in Two Distinct Components of the MHC Class I Antigen Processing Pathway. Cancer Research 61: 8647–8650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Bernal M, Ruiz-Cabello F, Concha A, Paschen A, Garrido F (2012) Implication of the β2-microglobulin gene in the generation of tumor escape phenotypes. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy: CII 61: 1359–1371. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1321-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chang C-C, Campoli M, Restifo NP, Wang X, Ferrone S (2005) Immune Selection of Hot-Spot β2-Microglobulin Gene Mutations, HLA-A2 Allospecificity Loss, and Antigen-Processing Machinery Component Down-Regulation in Melanoma Cells Derived from Recurrent Metastases following Immunotherapy. The Journal of Immunology 174: 1462–1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.del Campo AB, Kyte JA, Carretero J, Zinchencko S, Méndez R, González-Aseguinolaza G, et al. (2014) Immune escape of cancer cells with beta2-microglobulin loss over the course of metastatic melanoma. International Journal of Cancer 134: 102–113. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Rambow F, Malek O, Geffrotin C, Leplat JJ, Bouet S, Piton G, et al. (2008) Identification of differentially expressed genes in spontaneously regressing melanoma using the MeLiM Swine Model. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research 21: 147–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Tissot RG, Beattie CW, Amoss MS Jr. (1989) The swine leucocyte antigen (SLA) complex and Sinclair swine cutaneous malignant melanoma. Animal Genetics 20: 51–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Vincent-Naulleau S, Le Chalony C, Leplat J-J, Bouet S, Bailly C, Spatz A, et al. (2004) Clinical and Histopathological Characterization of Cutaneous Melanomas in the Melanoblastoma-Bearing Libechov Minipig Model. Pigment Cell Research 17: 24–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zhi-Qiang D, Silvia V-N, Hélène G, Florence V, Françoise C, Takeshi S, et al. (2007) Detection of novel quantitative trait loci for cutaneous melanoma by genome-wide scan in the MeLiM swine model. International Journal of Cancer 120: 303–320. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.