Abstract
Exposure to a stressful environment early in life can cause psychiatric disorders by disrupting circuit formation. Actin plays central roles in regulating neuronal structure and protein trafficking. We have recently reported that neonatal isolation inactivated ADF/cofilin, the actin depolymerizing factor, resulted in a reduced actin dynamics at spines and an attenuation of synaptic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor delivery in the juvenile rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), leading to altered social behaviours. Here, we investigated the impact of neonatal social isolation in the developing rat barrel cortex. Similar to the mPFC study, we detected an increase in stable actin fraction in spines and this resulted in a decreased synaptic AMPA receptor delivery. Thus, we conclude that early life social isolation affects multiple cortical areas with common molecular changes.
Introduction
The development of functional circuits in the cortex is crucial for cognitive functions, and their dysfunction may lead to a variety of psychiatric disorders1, 2. Sensory misprocessing potentially caused by abnormal circuit functioning in the somatosensory cortex is a prominent symptom of mental illness3.
Prolonged exposure to stressful situations early in life can affect the formation of neural circuits in the cortex leading to cognitive dysfunctions4–6. Synaptic plasticity driven by experience plays central roles in the establishment of neural circuits4, 6–22. Thus, elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying experience-dependent synaptic reorganization in the cortex following chronic neonatal stress is a prerequisite for understanding how neonatal maltreatment can induce mental disorders.
A number of studies have examined the molecular events occurring at synapses during the development of experience-driven neural plasticity. The synaptic insertion of glutamate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptors is one crucial mechanism that underlies this process7–14, 19–22. In young rodents, whisker experience drives GluA1 subunit-containing AMPA receptors into synapses in the developing barrel cortex4, 7. In addition, learning experience delivers GluA1 into synapses of the amygdala and hippocampus, and is required for memory formation10–12.
Actin, the principal cytoskeletal component of synapses, is enriched in postsynaptic spines23–25. Actin also regulates the assembly of postsynaptic proteins including AMPA receptors23, 24, 26–28. The dynamics of actin are regulated by a number of proteins. For example, the actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of actin-binding proteins plays an essential role in the turnover of actin fibres29. Moreover, ADF/cofilin mediates AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity, demonstrating thus the importance of actin dynamics for AMPA receptor delivery26.
We recently reported that neonatal social isolation inactivated ADF/cofilin and led to an increase in stable actin fractions at the dendritic spines in the juvenile rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Moreover, isolation-induced increase of stable actin fractions disrupted the experience-driven synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors and resulted in altered social behaviours5. Although there is strong correlation between mPFC and somatosensory cortex to develop social behaviours30–32, it is unclear how social isolation affect actin dynamics and regulate synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors in the somatosensory cortex.
Here, we found that neonatal social isolation induced the same molecular events at spines of the developing rat barrel cortex, implying the wide effects of neonatal isolation throughout the cortex.
Results
Neonatal isolation increases the fraction of stable actin in the developing rat barrel cortex
We recently reported that neonatal isolation affects actin dynamics at spines and synaptic AMPA receptor delivery in the juvenile mPFC5. To examine whether such events have a widespread occurrence in the cortex, we investigated the impact of early social isolation on developing rat barrel cortex. We isolated male pups from their mother and siblings for six hours per day for five days starting at postnatal day 7 (P7). Using this stress paradigm, we previously reported a long-lasting increase in corticosterone levels, a stress-induced glucocorticoid hormone, and an attenuation in experience-driven AMPA receptor delivery to synapses in layers 4 to 2/3 in the rat barrel cortex at P12–P144. Since actin dynamics regulate AMPA receptor trafficking at spines26, we examined whether early isolation affects actin dynamics. We introduced an expression vector for Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)-tagged actin by in utero electroporation into the cortical area that develops into the barrel cortex. We subsequently subjected the resulting pups to neonatal isolation from P7-P11. At P14, we prepared acute brain slices and performed Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching analysis (FRAP)5.
In the FRAP analysis, an individual spine in layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex was photobleached using high intensity laser illumination with a two-photon laser-scanning microscope (excitation wavelength of 910 nm). The time course of the subsequent fluorescence recovery in the photobleached spine was used to evaluate actin dynamics. Actin turnover depends on polymerization at the barbed end and depolymerization at the pointed end25. Typically, in the case of proteins that diffuse freely, a rapid and complete recovery of the photobleached fluorescence is observed. The existence of stable actin filaments with reduced turnover results in the increase of an unrecoverable fraction during FRAP analysis.
We detected a prominent increase in the unrecoverable fraction of GFP-actin in the photobleached spines obtained from socially-isolated rats compared to non-isolated controls (Fig. 1a,b). This observation indicates that early social isolation increases the stable immobilized actin fraction. We observed no difference in the time constant (τ) of fluorescence recovery between isolated and non-isolated rats (Fig. 1a,b). This finding suggested that there could exist two fractions of actin fibres: one that is unaffected by neonatal social isolation and maintains a normal turnover, and another that is modified following isolation and ceases dynamic turnover resulting in the increase in unrecoverable fraction after rapid photobleaching.
We previously reported that this social isolation procedure increases the level of circulating free corticosterone, a major stress hormone in rodents4. To examine if the neonatal isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction is mediated by glucocorticoid signalling, we injected animals with RU486, an antagonist of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), during the social isolation procedure followed by FRAP analysis of GFP-actin-expressing spines. We found that the unrecoverable fraction of photobleached GFP-actin in spines from isolated rats treated with RU486 was significantly smaller than that from isolated rats that did not receive RU486, and was comparable to that of non-isolated controls (Fig. 1c,d: compare with Fig. 1a,b). Therefore, we concluded that the isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction was dependent on glucocorticoid signalling.
Inactivation of ADF/cofilin mediates the social-isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction in the developing rat barrel cortex
A number of proteins regulate actin dynamics. ADF/cofilin is an actin-depolymerizing factor and is essential for the turnover of actin fibres26, 29. The ADF/cofilin is inactivated or activated by phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of its serine-3 (Ser3) residue, respectively26. To determine whether neonatal isolation stress alters the activity of ADF/cofilin, we measured Ser3 phosphorylation in ADF/cofilin expressed in the barrel cortex of non-isolated controls, isolated, and isolated RU486 -treated rats. Synaptoneurosome fractions isolated from the barrel cortex of each of the treatments groups were prepared at P11, then examined for the Ser3 phosphorylation of ADF/cofilin. We detected elevated ADF/cofilin phosphorylation at Ser3 in isolated rats compared to non-isolated controls and isolated RU486-treated rats (Fig. 2a,b). These observations indicate that neonatal isolation suppresses ADF/cofilin activity via glucocorticoid signalling in the developing barrel cortex as was observed in the juvenile mPFC5.
We next asked if ADF/cofilin inactivation mediates the isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction at spines in the barrel cortex. We introduced expression vectors for GFP-actin and a red fluorescent protein (RFP)-tagged ADF/cofilin Ser3A (a constitutively active form in which Ser3 is mutated to alanine) by in utero electroporation26. We then exposed the pups to the isolation procedure from P7-P11 and prepared acute brain slices for FRAP analysis at P14. We found that the unrecoverable fraction of GFP-actin after photobleaching at spines in layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex of isolated rats expressing Ser3A was comparable to that of the non-isolated controls (Figs 1a,b and 2c,d). Moreover, isolated rats exhibited a significantly larger unrecoverable fraction of GFP-actin at spines after rapid photobleaching than isolated rats expressing Ser3A (Fig. 2c,d). These results indicate that the isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction is mediated by ADF/cofilin inactivation.
The activity of cofilin is regulated by LIM kinase, which phosphorylates Ser3 of ADF/cofilin resulting in its inactivation. We next examined the activity of LIM kinase in the developing barrel cortex of isolated and non-isolated rats. The synaptoneurosome fractions from the barrel cortex of these rats were prepared at P11. The LIM kinase phosphorylation at threonine 508 (T508), an indicator of LIM kinase activity, was then assessed33, 34. We found an increased T508 phosphorylation of LIM kinase in the isolated rats compared to non-isolated controls and isolated RU486-treated rats (Fig. 2e,f). Furthermore, we compared Rac1 activation between isolated and non-isolated rats given its reported involvement in LIM kinase activity35. The synaptoneurosome fraction prepared from isolated rats exhibited an increase in the GTP-bound activated form of Rac1 compared to non-isolated rats and isolated RU486-treated rats (Fig. 2g,h). Together, these findings indicate that neonatal isolation activates Rac1 leading to LIM kinase activation and ADF/cofilin inactivation via Ser3 phosphorylation.
ADF/cofilin inactivation mediates the social-isolation-induced suppression of experience-driven synaptic delivery of the AMPA receptor in the developing barrel cortex
We recently reported that neonatal isolation-induced inactivation of ADF/cofilin disrupts the experience-driven synaptic delivery of the AMPA receptor in the juvenile mPFC5. Therefore, we examined here the effect of neonatal isolation-induced inactivation of ADF/cofilin on synaptic functions in the developing barrel cortex. We introduced expression vectors for GFP-actin and either RFP-ADF/cofilin Ser3A or RFP alone into the barrel cortex by in utero electroporation and subsequently exposed pups to the isolation procedure from P7-P11. We then prepared acute brain slices at P14 and recorded the synaptic transmission of pyramidal synapses at layer 4 to layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex. We measured the ratio of AMPA receptor-mediated transmission to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated transmission (A/N ratio). We found that the A/N ratio of isolated rats expressing RFP-ADF/cofilin Ser3A was significantly greater than that of isolated rats expressing RFP alone, but comparable to that of non-isolated controls. This observation indicates that the isolation-induced disruption of experience-driven synaptic delivery of the AMPA receptor is mediated by ADF/cofilin inactivation (Fig. 3a).
Next, we asked if activation of ADF/cofilin after the isolation procedure leads to a recovery of synaptic delivery of the AMPA receptor. For that, we exposed pups to the isolation procedure from P7-P11, and then injected Herpes simplex virus expressing Venus-IRES-ADF/cofilin Ser3A or Venus-IRES alone into layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex at P13. Acute brain slices were prepared at P14 and synaptic transmission of pyramidal synapses at layer 4 to layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex was recorded. We found that the A/N ratio of isolated rats expressing Venus-IRES-ADF/cofilin Ser3A was significantly greater than that of isolated rats expressing Venus-IRES alone, but comparable to that of non-isolated controls (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that the neonatal isolation stress-induced inactivation of signalling pathways required for AMPA receptor trafficking can be recovered by the reactivation of ADF/cofilin.
Social-isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction suppresses the experience-driven synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors in the developing barrel cortex
We recently reported that the increased stable actin suppresses AMPA receptor trafficking at the mPFC synapses of isolated rats5. To investigate the relationship between the increased stable actin fraction and the suppression of AMPA receptor trafficking in the developing barrel cortex of isolated rats, we co-introduced expression vectors for super-ecliptic pHluorin (SEP) fused to the N-terminus of GluA1 and tdTomato-tagged actin into the rat barrel cortex by in utero electroporation. We then isolated rat pups as described above, and prepared acute brain slices at P14. The expression of SEP-GluA1 is selectively detected at the cell surface due to the strong fluorescence of SEP at or above pH 7 and the decreased fluorescence of SEP-GluA1 when localized to intracellular acidic secretory compartments. In the brain slices, we performed FRAP analysis to observe the tdTomato-actin dynamics at individual spines at layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex. We then induced chemical LTP by briefly exposing the slices to the potassium channel blocker tetraethylammonium (TEA). This method successfully induced LTP at of layers 4-2/3 synapses in the barrel cortical slices obtained from non-isolated rats but not from isolated rats (Fig. 4a). Consistent with this finding, chemically-induced LTP increased the surface expression of GluA1 in the spines in non-isolated rats but not in isolated rats (Fig. 4b,c). Interestingly, we found a negative correlation between the amount of stable actin and the LTP-induced increase in surface GluA1 at individual spines of the isolated rats (Fig. 4d). These findings suggest that the isolation-induced increase in the stable actin fraction suppresses experience-driven synaptic delivery of the AMPA receptor.
Discussion
We previously reported that neonatal social isolation disrupts experience-driven synaptic AMPA receptor delivery to synapses in the developing rat barrel cortex, resulting in impairment of somatosensory perception4, 6. Further, we recently reported that neonatal social isolation inactivated the ADF/cofilin and led to the increased stable actin fractions at dendritic spines in the juvenile mPFC5. Isolation-induced increase of stable actin fractions prevented the experience-driven synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors and resulted in increase of aggression, one of antisocial behaviour5. Recent studies suggest that aggressive behaviour related with hypoactivation of the PFC is thought to be associated with the dysregulation of somatosensory system36. Also, it is reported that the development of mPFC is affected by sensory stimuli early in life30. Thus, the integrative neuronal network between mPFC and somatosensory cortex might be required to establish social behaviours. Here, we found that the same molecular events occur at spines in the developing barrel cortex of animals with neonatal social isolation. The wide effects of neonatal isolation among multiple cortical areas might be important to understand the molecular mechanism of antisocial behaviour.
Actin turnover is required for the trafficking of AMPA receptors. Latrunculin A, an agent that inhibits actin polymerization by sequestering actin monomers, attenuates the chemical LTP-induced increase in AMPA receptor surface expression at spines26. Furthermore, jasplakinolide, a natural cyclic peptide that binds actin filaments to promote actin polymerization and inhibit depolymerization, thereby stabilizing actin filaments, also inhibits AMPA receptor trafficking to the plasma membrane induced by chemical LTP26. Phalloidin, which stabilizes actin filaments, attenuates the LTP magnitude37. Together with our current results and previous findings5, these data suggest that the increased fraction of isolation-induced stable actin detected in isolated animals may be the primary mechanism underlying the isolation-induced blockade of synaptic AMPA receptor delivery.
We recently found that neonatal social isolation leads to the activation of LIM kinase and inactivation of ADF/cofilin in the juvenile mPFC. Here, we observed the same signalling events in the developing barrel cortex of rats exposed to neonatal isolation. Thus, neonatal isolation could lead to widespread molecular alterations of common nature throughout the neocortex. Furthermore, we found that Rac1 activity was increased in the developing barrel cortex of isolated rats, which could result in the activation of Rac1, leading to the elevation of LIM kinase activity35. ADF/cofilin is inactivated by LIM Kinase mediated phosphorylation, while dephosphorylation of ADF/cofilin is regulated by chronophin phosphatase, slingshot phosphatase38, and protein phosphatase 1, 2A and 2C39. Slingshot and protein phosphatase 1 also have important roles in synaptic AMPA receptor trafficking by controlling actin cytoskeleton40, 41. Therefore, neonatal social isolation have potential to affect various ADF/cofilin regulatory pathways in the spine, resulting in the disruption of synaptic AMPA receptor delivery.
Recently, the effect of chronic stress on glutamate receptors has been reported in the various brain regions42. Early life stress decreased expression of hippocampal AMPA receptor subunits, GluA1 and GluA2, and NMDA receptor subunits, GluN143. Chronic stress in adult mice also decreased the total and surface protein levels of NMDA receptor subunits as well as AMPA receptors in the PFC44. In the basolateral amygdala, chronic stress increased GluA1 phosphorylation at Ser 845 and induced calcium-permeable AMPA receptors45. The protein levels of GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor was also upregulated in the amygdala of rats exposed to the chronic stress46. In the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of adult mice, chronic social stress was reported to increase the protein level of GluA147 and reduce Rac1 expression via epigenetic regulation48. Thus, chronic stress exhibited various effects on AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors in multiple brain regions. According to previous reports and our data5, chronic stress could lead to neocortical and limbic dysfunction through multiple Rac1-ADF/cofilin mediated mechanisms, leading to disruption of synaptic AMPA receptor delivery. The imbalance of the activity among the interconnected brain regions might cause various symptoms of human psychiatric disorders.
Methods
Ethics Statement
All experiments were conducted according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Japan Neuroscience Society) and the Guide for the Yokohama City University. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Yokohama City University (authorization number: F-A-14-028). All surgical procedures were performed under anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.
Animals and neonatal social isolation
Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (Charles River Laboratories), and multiple colonies that contained five males and five females each were used. Rats were housed in plastic ekon cages and maintained on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle (full light at 0500 and full darkness at 1900). The temperature and humidity were held constant at 22 °C ± 1 °C and 55% ± 5%, respectively. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Procedures were performed in strict compliance with the animal use and care guidelines of Yokohama City University.
During the neonatal social isolation procedure, three male pups were isolated from their mother and siblings for six hours per day from 10:00 to 16:00 between postnatal day 7 (P7) and P11. During the isolation period, each male pup was kept alone in a smaller cage placed over a heating pad at 35 °C and moved into an adjacent room.
Constructs
GFP-actin and tdTomato-actin were PCR amplified and subcloned into the pCAGGS-EX and pEF-BOS vectors, respectively. pCALNL-GluA1 and pCAG-ERT2CreERT were gifts from R. Malinow (University of California at San Diego). The Cofilin Ser3A cDNA-mRFP construct was a gift from J. Zheng (Emory University School of Medicine). The Cofilin Ser3A cDNA-mRFP was PCR amplified and subcloned into the pEF-BOS and HSV-IRES-Venus vectors.
In Utero Electroporation
Layer 2/3 progenitor cells were transfected by in utero electroporation. Embryonic day 17 (E17) pregnant SD rats were anesthetized with an isoflurane-oxygen mixture. Approximately 0.5 ml of DNA solution containing fast green was pressure injected through a pulled-glass capillary tube by mouth into the left lateral ventricle of each embryo. The head of each embryo was placed between tweezer electrodes with the anode contacting the left hemisphere. Electroporation was achieved with five square pulses (duration = 50 ms, frequency = 5 Hz, voltage = 80 V; BEX Co.).
In vivo infection of barrel cortex neurons
Rats were deeply anesthetized with an isoflurane-oxygen mixture. The skin covering the skull was cut and gently pushed to the side. The anterior fontanel was identified and a region 2-mm posterior, 4.5-mm lateral was gently pierced with a dental drill. The recombinant Herpes virus was pressure-injected through a pulled-glass capillary (Narishige) into the barrel cortex. After injection, the skin was repositioned and its integrity was maintained with cyanoacrylate glue. Rats were kept on a heating pad during the procedures, and returned to their home cage after regaining movement.
Analysis of FRAP data
Images were obtained using a two-photon laser-scanning microscope (FV-1000MPE; Olympus) with a water immersion objective (25 × 1.05 NA; Olympus). FRAP analysis was performed using a macro function of the stimulus setting menu in the Fluoview software to control sequential image acquisition and emission of a photobleaching laser pulse to the region of interest (ROI). A single dendritic spine of a layer 2/3 neuron in the rat barrel cortex was set as the ROI and two pre-bleaching images acquired. The spine fluorescence was then photobleached with a two-photon laser at 910 nm. The recovery of fluorescence was traced for an additional 6 min by acquiring images at 20-s intervals. Minimum laser power was used to prevent photobleaching during the pre- and post-bleaching stages. Background fluorescence was subtracted from the fluorescence of the target spine. The intensity of bleached spines was normalized to the baseline fluorescence and normalized to neighbouring non-photobleached spines at each time point. The GFP-actin signals were fitted to a single exponential curve using the following equation (Igor Pro, Wavemetrics):
where F t=∞ represents the unrecoverable fluorescence, considered to be a fixed population of fluorescent protein, and τ is the time constant for recovery.
Western blotting
Barrel cortex samples were rapidly dissected and stored at −80 °C. Synaptoneurosome fractions were prepared as previously described4. Frozen samples were homogenized in ice-cold homogenization buffer (10 mM Hepes, 1.0 mM EDTA, 2.0 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF, 10 mg/L leupeptin, and 100 nM microcystin). Tissue was homogenized in a glass/glass tissue homogenizer, and homogenates were passed through two 100-µm-pore nylon mesh filters, and then through a 5-µm-pore filter. Filtered homogenates were centrifuged at 3600 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellets were re-suspended in 100 µL of boiling homogenization buffer with 1% SDS, followed by immunoblotting. The signal intensity of each band was measured by MultiGauge (Fujifilm). The net signal was calculated by subtracting the background signal obtained from the region adjacent to the band49.
Rac activation assay
The activation of Rac1 was measured with the Rac1 activity assay kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a fusion protein consisting of the p21-binding domain of Pak1, which specifically binds to the active form of Rac1 (Rac-GTP), and not to the inactive form of Rac1 (Rac-GDP), was used for precipitation of Rac-GTP. This was followed by western blotting with the Rac1 antibody.
Antibodies
Antibodies to phospho-Cofilin (Abcam: ab12866), Cofilin (Abcam: ab42824), phospho-LIM kinase (Cell Signaling Technology: 3841), LIM kinase (Cell Signaling Technology: 3842), Rac1 (Millipore: 05-389), and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology: 2118) were used.
Drug treatment
Systemically-administered drugs were injected subcutaneously. RU486 (40 µg/g of body weight; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO and injected twice a day during isolation.
Electrophysiology
Rats were anesthetized with an isoflurane-oxygen mixture and the brains were removed. The brains were quickly transferred into gassed (95% O2 and 5% CO2) ice-cold dissection buffer as described previously4. Coronal brain slices were cut (350 µm, Leica VT1000) in dissection buffer. Slices were then incubated in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) as described previously50.
Patch recording pipettes (3–7 MΩ) were filled with intracellular solutions as described previously4. The recording chamber was perfused with ACSF containing 0.1 mM picrotoxin, and 4 µM 2-chloroadenosine at 22–25 °C. Whole-cell recordings were obtained from layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons of the rat barrel cortex with a Multiclamp 700B (Axon Instruments). Bipolar tungsten stimulating electrodes were placed in layer 4. The stimulus intensity was increased until a synaptic response with an amplitude >~10 pA was recorded. Synaptic AMPA receptor-mediated currents at −60 mV and +40 mV were averaged over 50 trials. The AMPA/NMDA ratio was calculated as the ratio of the peak current at −60 mV to the current at +40 mV 50 ms after stimulus onset.
Cre Recombinase Activation by 4-hydroxytamoxifen
4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in ethanol at 20 mg/mL and diluted with 9 volumes of sesame oil (Sigma-Aldrich). Rats received intraperitoneal injections of diluted 4-OHT (2 mg/mL) at P12 (100 µl per animal).
Chemically induced LTP
For chemical stimulation, brain slices were incubated in ACSF at room temperature, followed by stimulation with 25 mM TEA (Sigma) in ACSF for 10 min before changing back to regular ACSF. EPSCs were recorded for 40 min after the replacement with regular ACSF. Throughout the recording, EPSC amplitude was always normalized to the average baseline amplitude before stimulation.
Imaging
Images were captured before and 30 min after TEA cLTP induction using a two-photon laser-scanning microscope (FV-1000MPE; Olympus) with a water immersion objective (25 × 1.05 NA; Olympus). SEP and tdTomato were excited at 910 nm with a Ti:sapphire laser (Mai Tai DeepSee; Spectra-Physics). Green and red fluorescent signals were separated by a set of dichroic mirrors and filters (Olympus). The SEP and tdTomato fluorescence in spines and dendrites was measured as integrated green and red fluorescence, respectively, after background and leak subtraction. The ratio of the SEP fluorescence intensity of the spine head to the dendritic shaft was measured on manually selected spine head and dendritic shaft areas.
Statistics
All data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Experiments with two groups were statistically analysed using unpaired Student’s t-tests. Experiments with more than two groups were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s protected least significant difference (PLSD) post-hoc test.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank our colleagues in the Takahashi laboratory for help, encouragement, and advice. We thank Dr. R. Malinow and Dr. J. Zheng for valuable reagents. This project was supported by: Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology (T.T.), KAKENHI (26290025 (T.T.), 15K15041, 24700382 (H.T.)), and a grant for the “Development of Biomarker Candidates for Social Behavior” carried out under the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (T.T.). This project was partially supported by the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED (T.T.), and the Brain Mapping by Integrated Neurotechnologies for Disease Studies (Brain/MINDS) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and development, AMED (T.T.).
Author Contributions
H.T. and T.T. designed research; H.T., T.M., H.K., M.K., N.Y., K.K., H.A., and K.S. performed research; K.T., S.J., W.N., A.T., and A.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; and H.T. and T.T. wrote the paper.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08849-3
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Frith, C. & Dolan, R. The role of the prefrontal cortex in higher cognitive functions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res5, 175–181, doi:S0926-6410(96)00054-7 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Gamo NJ, Arnsten AF. Molecular modulation of prefrontal cortex: rational development of treatments for psychiatric disorders. Behav Neurosci. 2011;125:282–296. doi: 10.1037/a0023165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.James K, Miller LJ, Schaaf R, Nielsen DM, Schoen SA. Phenotypes within sensory modulation dysfunction. Compr Psychiatry. 2011;52:715–724. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miyazaki T, et al. Disrupted cortical function underlies behavior dysfunction due to social isolation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2012;122:2690–2701. doi: 10.1172/JCI63060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tada, H. et al. Neonatal isolation augments social dominance by altering actin dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, doi:10.1073/pnas.1606351113 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Miyazaki T, et al. Social isolation perturbs experience-driven synaptic glutamate receptor subunit 4 delivery in the developing rat barrel cortex. The European journal of neuroscience. 2013;37:1602–1609. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takahashi T, Svoboda K, Malinow R. Experience strengthening transmission by driving AMPA receptors into synapses. Science. 2003;299:1585–1588. doi: 10.1126/science.1079886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Clem RL, Barth A. Pathway-specific trafficking of native AMPARs by in vivo experience. Neuron. 2006;49:663–670. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kessels HW, Malinow R. Synaptic AMPA receptor plasticity and behavior. Neuron. 2009;61:340–350. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mitsushima D, Ishihara K, Sano A, Kessels HW, Takahashi T. Contextual learning requires synaptic AMPA receptor delivery in the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:12503–12508. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104558108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mitsushima D, Sano A, Takahashi T. A cholinergic trigger drives learning-induced plasticity at hippocampal synapses. Nat Commun. 2013;4 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rumpel S, LeDoux J, Zador A, Malinow R. Postsynaptic receptor trafficking underlying a form of associative learning. Science (New York, N.Y. 2005;308:83–88. doi: 10.1126/science.1103944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jitsuki S, et al. Serotonin mediates cross-modal reorganization of cortical circuits. Neuron. 2011;69:780–792. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee HK, et al. Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit is required for synaptic plasticity and retention of spatial memory. Cell. 2003;112:631–643. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00122-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitlock JR, Heynen AJ, Shuler MG, Bear MF. Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Science (New York, NY. 2006;313:1093–1097. doi: 10.1126/science.1128134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Trachtenberg JT, et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature. 2002;420:788–794. doi: 10.1038/nature01273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jacob V, Petreanu L, Wright N, Svoboda K, Fox K. Regular spiking and intrinsic bursting pyramidal cells show orthogonal forms of experience-dependent plasticity in layer V of barrel cortex. Neuron. 2012;73:391–404. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang S, et al. Pull-push neuromodulation of LTP and LTD enables bidirectional experience-induced synaptic scaling in visual cortex. Neuron. 2012;73:497–510. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jitsuki S, et al. Nogo Receptor Signaling Restricts Adult Neural Plasticity by Limiting Synaptic AMPA Receptor Delivery. Cerebral cortex. 2016;26:427–439. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nakajima W, Jitsuki S, Sano A, Takahashi T. Sustained Enhancement of Lateral Inhibitory Circuit Maintains Cross Modal Cortical Reorganization. PloS one. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tada H, et al. Estrous Cycle-Dependent Phasic Changes in the Stoichiometry of Hippocampal Synaptic AMPA Receptors in Rats. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tada H, et al. Phasic synaptic incorporation of GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors at gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons is involved in the generation of the luteinizing hormone surge in female rats. Neuroscience. 2013;248:664–669. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dillon C, Goda Y. The actin cytoskeleton: integrating form and function at the synapse. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:25–55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Okamoto K, Nagai T, Miyawaki A, Hayashi Y. Rapid and persistent modulation of actin dynamics regulates postsynaptic reorganization underlying bidirectional plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1104–1112. doi: 10.1038/nn1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Star EN, Kwiatkowski DJ, Murthy VN. Rapid turnover of actin in dendritic spines and its regulation by activity. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:239–246. doi: 10.1038/nn811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gu J, et al. ADF/cofilin-mediated actin dynamics regulate AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity. Nature neuroscience. 2010;13:1208–1215. doi: 10.1038/nn.2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Okabe S. Molecular dynamics of the excitatory synapse. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;970:131–152. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0932-8_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen LY, Rex CS, Casale MS, Gall CM, Lynch G. Changes in synaptic morphology accompany actin signaling during LTP. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5363–5372. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0164-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bamburg JR, Bernstein BW. Roles of ADF/cofilin in actin polymerization and beyond. F1000 Biol Rep. 2010;2 doi: 10.3410/B2-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kolb B, et al. Experience and the developing prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(Suppl 2):17186–17193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121251109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim H, Lim CS, Kaang BK. Neuronal mechanisms and circuits underlying repetitive behaviors in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Behav Brain Funct. 2016;12 doi: 10.1186/s12993-016-0087-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kross E, Berman MG, Mischel W, Smith EE, Wager TD. Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:6270–6275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1102693108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Edwards DC, Sanders LC, Bokoch GM, Gill GN. Activation of LIM-kinase by Pak1 couples Rac/Cdc42 GTPase signalling to actin cytoskeletal dynamics. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:253–259. doi: 10.1038/12963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ding Y, Milosavljevic T, Alahari SK. Nischarin inhibits LIM kinase to regulate cofilin phosphorylation and cell invasion. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3742–3756. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01832-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mizuno K. Signaling mechanisms and functional roles of cofilin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Cell Signal. 2013;25:457–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mancke F, Herpertz SC, Bertsch K. Aggression in borderline personality disorder: A multidimensional model. Personal Disord. 2015;6:278–291. doi: 10.1037/per0000098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim CH, Lisman JE. A role of actin filament in synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation. J Neurosci. 1999;19:4314–4324. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04314.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huang TY, Minamide LS, Bamburg JR, Bokoch GM. Chronophin mediates an ATP-sensing mechanism for cofilin dephosphorylation and neuronal cofilin-actin rod formation. Dev Cell. 2008;15:691–703. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Takuma T, Ichida T, Yokoyama N, Tamura S, Obinata T. Dephosphorylation of cofilin in parotid acinar cells. J Biochem. 1996;120:35–41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Morishita W, Marie H, Malenka RC. Distinct triggering and expression mechanisms underlie LTD of AMPA and NMDA synaptic responses. Nature neuroscience. 2005;8:1043–1050. doi: 10.1038/nn1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yuen EY, Liu W, Kafri T, van Praag H, Yan Z. Regulation of AMPA receptor channels and synaptic plasticity by cofilin phosphatase Slingshot in cortical neurons. The Journal of physiology. 2010;588:2361–2371. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.186353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD. Stress Effects on Neuronal Structure: Hippocampus, Amygdala, and Prefrontal Cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:3–23. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang HT, et al. Early-Life Social Isolation-Induced Depressive-Like Behavior in Rats Results in Microglial Activation and Neuronal Histone Methylation that Are Mitigated by Minocycline. Neurotox Res. 2017;31:505–520. doi: 10.1007/s12640-016-9696-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yuen EY, et al. Repeated stress causes cognitive impairment by suppressing glutamate receptor expression and function in prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2012;73:962–977. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yi ES, Oh S, Lee JK, Leem YH. Chronic stress-induced dendritic reorganization and abundance of synaptosomal PKA-dependent CP-AMPA receptor in the basolateral amygdala in a mouse model of depression. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2017;486:671–678. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pochwat B, et al. Antidepressant-like activity of magnesium in the chronic mild stress model in rats: alterations in the NMDA receptor subunits. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology / official scientific journal of the Collegium Internationale Neuropsychopharmacologicum. 2014;17:393–405. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713001089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang JC, et al. Comparison of ketamine, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone, and ANA-12 antidepressant effects in the social defeat stress model of depression. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:4325–4335. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Golden SA, et al. Epigenetic regulation of RAC1 induces synaptic remodeling in stress disorders and depression. Nature medicine. 2013;19:337–344. doi: 10.1038/nm.3090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tada H, et al. Fbxo45, a novel ubiquitin ligase, regulates synaptic activity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:3840–3849. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.046284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Takemoto K, et al. Optical inactivation of synaptic AMPA receptors erases fear memory. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:38–47. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.