Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Gerontology. 2017 Mar 11;63(5):479–487. doi: 10.1159/000460292

Table 2.

Between groups comparisons adjusted by BMI and Gender with no adjustment with age. Correlations between sensor-derived parameters with age, FES-I (fear of falling), and foot pain are reported. The asterisk symbol indicates a significant difference with p-value less than 0.05.

Parameter Non-frail (n=43) Pre-frail/Frail (n=76) Effect Size p-value Correlation with age (r) p-value Correlation with FES-I1 (r) p-value Correlation with foot pain2 (r) p-value
Total number of transitions, [n] 1174±468 878±333 0.73 0.001* r=−0.51
p<0.001*
r=0.24
p<0.001*
r=0.09
p=0.321
Sit-to-stand, [n] 85±45 83±40 0.07 0.789 r=−0.19
p=0.040*
r=0.11
p=0.009*
r=0.04
p=0.679
Sit-to-walk, [n] 23±11 23±9 0.04 0.941 r=−0.18
p=0.044*
r=0.03
p=0.769
r=0.01
p=0.981
Stand-to-sit, [n] 64±37 66±34 0.06 0.288 r=−0.05
p=0.554
r=0.03
p=0.703
r=0.01
p=0.972
Stand-to-walk, [n] 475±208 332±148 0.79 <0.001* r=−0.53
p<0.001*
r=0.25
p=0.007*
r=0.10
p=0.266
Quick-sitting, [n] 45±16 40±15 0.29 0.097 r=−0.49
p<0.001*
r=0.190
p=0.039*
r=0.09
p=0.315
Walk-to-stand, [n] 453±202 314±141 0.79 <0.001* r=−0.51
p<0.001*
r=0.24
p=0.010*
r=0.10
p=0.286
Ratio of cautious-sitting, [%] 47±14 49±12 0.22 0.025* r=0.29
p=0.002*
r=0.147
p=0.111
r=0.12
p=0.185
1

Short fall efficacy scale international (FES-I)

2

Visual analog scale between 0 and 10

Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Sidak.

Bolded values indicate statistical significant of p<0.050