Abstract
During periods of activity, sweat glands produce pressures associated with osmotic effects to drive liquid to the surface of the skin. The magnitudes of these pressures may provide insights into physiological health, the intensity of physical exertion, psychological stress factors and/other information of interest, yet they are currently unknown due to absence of means for non-invasive measurement. This paper introduces a thin, soft wearable microfluidic system that mounts onto the surface of the skin to enable precise and routine measurements of secretory fluidic pressures generated at the surface of the skin by eccrine sweat glands (surface SPSG, or s-SPSG) at nearly any location on the body. These platforms incorporate an arrayed collection of unit cells each of which includes an opening to the skin, an inlet through which sweat can flow, a capillary bursting valve (CBV) with a unique bursting pressure (BP), a corresponding microreservoir to receive sweat and an outlet to the surrounding ambient to allow release of backpressure. The BPs systematically span the physiologically relevant range. The set of unit cells is designed such that the BP difference between any two unit cells is greater than the combined uncertainty. Human studies demonstrate measurements of s-SPSG under different conditions, from various regions of the body. Average values in healthy young adults lie between 2.4 and 2.9 kPa. Sweat associated with vigorous exercise have s-SPSGs that are somewhat higher than those associated with sedentary activity. For all conditions, the forearm and lower back tend to yield the highest and lowest s-SPSGs, respectively.
Keywords: sweat, epidermal, secretory pressure of sweat glands, microfluidics, capillary bursting valve
Table of contents entry
We introduce a skin-mounted microfluidic device for measuring the secretory pressure of sweat glands at the surface of the skin.
Introduction
Emerging capabilities in thin, soft skin-mounted electronic technologies enable precision, continuous monitoring of many key clinical parameters related to physiological health status1, 2. The associated potential for improvements in human healthcare are significant, beyond anything that can be realistically envisioned with conventional rigid devices that couple to the wrist or the chest with bands or straps. Many classes of skin-like, or ‘epidermal’, electronic systems are now available in research labs and early commercial forms, including clinical-quality sensors for electrocardiography3, electromyography4, temperature5, blood flow6, blood oximetry7, hydration8 and many others9–12. Recent work qualitatively extends the capabilities of such skin-interfaced platforms through the addition of soft, ‘epidermal’ microfluidic systems that can capture, store and chemically analyze sweat naturally released from the surface of the skin13–16. These devices, with or without electronic functionality, softly seal to the skin in a manner that allows sweat glands to pump sweat into microfluidic networks where various measurements can be performed. Demonstrations include sweat rate, total sweat loss and pH, along with the concentration of glucose, lactate, chloride and creatinine17–19. Advanced designs allow time sequential sampling and storage of sweat for purposes of capturing temporal changes in sweat chemistry14. Alternative advanced technologies for continuous sweat analytics use absorbent pads or gels, without microfluidic structures, primarily for electrochemical analysis. Possibilities range from concentrations of metabolites such as glucose11, 20–22, lactate23, and alcohol24 to electrolytes such as sodium25, 26, chloride27, calcium28, to various heavy metal ions29. Glucose in sweat is proportional to the blood glucose level and therefore serves as a biomarker for diabetes patients30, 31; lactate is related to sweat generation rate32–34; chloride concentration is a diagnostic for cystic fibrosis35 and it provides important insights into overall electrolyte balance; heavy metal ions can yield an early indication of exposure to toxic metals. Although significant research activity focuses on measurement of these and other chemical species, the physical characteristics associated with the underlying processes of sweating have not been studied due to lack of suitable metrology methods.
Sweat glands operate by osmotic pressures produced by differences in osmolality between plasma and sweat34. Specifically, the concentrations of sodium and chloride in sweat are higher than those in the plasma, thereby producing pressure that induces flow of sweat from the glands through ducts that terminate at the skin surface. Using conventional techniques, the secretory pressure of the sweat glands (SPSG) can be difficult or impossible to determine under natural conditions. In 1969, Schulz et al. used an external, lab-scale manometer connected to a micropipette inserted into the sweat duct to measure the SPSG at the sweat duct from immobilized human subjects during sweating induced by introduction of pilocarpine into the skin by iontophoresis36. The mean values of pressures determined in this manner are ~40 kPa, with a remarkably broad range, from ~3 to ~70 kPa. Although simple engineering models of flow through the microfluidic structures of the glands and ducts suggest that such pressures are reasonable based on observed sweat rates34, additional examples of experimental studies cannot be found in the literature, likely due to difficulties associated with the measurements. The development of convenient approaches to determine s-SPSG in real-time, during normal activities across a range of body locations could rekindle interest in the physical metrology of sweating, where pressure, combined with cumulative and instantaneous flow rates, could provide interesting insights into exercise physiology.
The following introduces a thin, soft, skin-mounted microfluidic device for measuring the SPSG at the surface of the skin (s-SPSG) from small, well-defined collections of sweat glands. The device uses an arrayed collection of microfluidic structures, each with a capillary bursting valve (CBV) selected with a different bursting pressure (BP) across a physiologically relevant range. Here, each CBV passes liquid only if the pressure of the flow exceeds that of the BP, as defined by its engineered geometry. In an array of CBVs, each with a slightly different BP, the largest/smallest BPs that are smaller/larger than the s-SPSG define the pressure to within an uncertainty determined by the difference between these two BPs. A simple platform based on this concept yields capabilities that allow, to our knowledge, the first measurements of s-SPSG associated with naturally occurring sweat under realistic scenarios. Studies based on human subjects and different parts of the body under various conditions provide an initial set of data on the physiological and physical aspects of sweat generation and flow.
Results and discussion
Thin, soft microfluidic devices for measuring secretory fluidic pressures generated at the surface of the skin by eccrine sweat glands
The devices consist of three layers of soft, elastomeric materials; a uniform capping layer, a microfluidic layer with microchannels, microreservoirs, CBVs, inlets (to the skin) and outlets (to the surrounding ambient) and an adhesive layer with openings to the skin that align with the inlets (Fig. 1a–d). The devices adhere to the skin to a degree that does not allow lateral propagation of sweat or other forms of leakage, up to s-SPSG values of ~15 kPa (Fig. S1). Conformal contact of the adhesive layer effectively prevents any significant lateral flow of sweat from regions away from the defined openings15. When a sweat pore is blocked by the device, it is reabsorbed into the sweat duct. Each inlet connects to a microfluidic channel that leads to a CBV (Fig. 1c) as an entry point to a corresponding microreservoir. An outlet at the opposite side of the microreservoir eliminates backpressure would otherwise result from trapped air. If the s-SPSG is higher than the BP, then flow occurs and the microreservoir fills with sweat. If the s-SPSG is lower than the BP, then flow does not occur and the microreservoir does not fill with sweat (Fig. 1e and f). Evaluation of filling patterns across an array of such structures with CBVs that have BPs distributed throughout a physiologically relevant range allows for direct assessment of the s-SPSG.
Fabrication details are in the method section and Fig. S2. Bonding between the channel and capping layer occurs by completing the curing process (10 min at 70 °C in an oven) with the two layers in contact37. The contact angle of water on PDMS processed in this manner is 120.6° ± 0.5° (Fig. S3). This parameter is critical in the design of CBVs. The three circular posts in the chamber prevent collapse of the chamber.
Arrays of CBVs for measuring sweat pressure
In vitro experiments determine the BPs of CBVs with a range of channel widths between 20 µm to 100 µm (Fig S4a and b), thereby establishing the relationship between width and BP (Fig. S4b). Pilot tests with various such platforms on the skin of healthy young volunteers define a relatively narrow range of s-SPSG values, i.e. from 2.1 to 2.3 kPa (Fig. S4c and d), for use with subjects in the studies described subsequently. The final device designs include 12 CBVs, each with a different BP, with widths from 10 µm to 120 µm at increments of 10 µm (Fig. 2a). Each CBV leads to a separate microreservoir and corresponding inlet, adhesive opening and outlet. As example, images in Fig. 2b show CBV #1, #5 and #9, which have widths 120, 80 and 40 µm, respectively. For human testing, a colorimetric indicator of sweat inserted into each microreservoir allows rapid visual readout (Fig. 2c). As an example of operation, if the sweat pressure is sufficiently high to burst CBV #5 and but not #6, then microreservoirs #1–#5 fill, and change in color from blue to pink, but #6–#12 remain empty (Fig. 2d and e, S5a and b). The s-SPSG of the skin is determined as the highest BP among the burst CBVs. The volume of the channel that leads to the CBV has a volume of 0.1 µl (Fig. S5c). Even modest rates of sweating fill this volume quickly. If the sweat stops at the valve, the surface area of the sweat open to the chamber is only 0.01mm2. As a result, the amount of sweat available to generate vapor is very small. The total volume of the chamber is ~0.8 µl. Previous studies indicate that the sweat rate from the skin under the device is ~0.6 µl/min/gland. When the s-SPSG is higher than the BP, the sweat quickly fills the chamber. No observable condensation occurred in the chamber during the time of testing.
Experimental measurement and mechanics modeling of BPs
The Young–Laplace equation describes the BP for a rectangular channel as38, 39,
(1) |
where σ is surface tension of liquid, θA is the critical advancing contact angle of the channel, is the min[θA + β, 180°], β is diverging angle of the channel, b and h are width and height of the diverging section, respectively. The surface tension of sweat and, therefore, the BPs can be affected by the presence of oils and other substances from the skin, as well as temperature. All reported tests involved preparation of the skin by use of an alcohol swab immediately before mounting the devices, as a means to eliminate oils and other contaminants. The skin temperature in all tests was within a range from 30 to 37°C, typical of exercise40. The estimated temperature related changes in BP are, therefore, within 3%, and can be neglected.
Analysis of scanning electron microscope images allows accurate determination of the dimensions (Table S1). The critical advancing contact angle follows from measuring the angle at the moment when a drop just starts to move across the surface of a tilted PDMS slab41. The advancing contact angle of water on PDMS is 125° ±2°, which is slightly larger than the stationary contact angle, 120.6° (Fig. S3c).
Imperfections in the fabrication process lead to slight rounding of the edges at the exit regions of the CBVs, thereby increasing the effective width of the channel (Fig. 3b). For CBVs with rounded edges, the position of advancing interface marked by θe (0 ≤ θe ≤ β, Fig. S6a) is undetermined, and the bursting pressure given by equation (1) becomes
(2) |
where be = b + 2re(1 − cos θe), re is radius of rounding edge, and . The bursting pressure BP varies as the advancing interface moves, and the final critical bursting pressure BPcr is determined by maximizing equation BP with respect to advancing interface position θe. Because the second term of equation (2) (defined as ) is independent of θe, we focus on the first term (defined as ). For β > π − θA (as in real application), BPb can be written out as
(3) |
(4) |
Figure 3b shows versus θe for β = 90°, θA = 120° and re/b = 0.01, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0. The peak points marked by star correspond to the critical (BPb)cr determined by maximizing BPb with respect to interface position θe. It is also shown that the critical bursting pressure decreases with the increasing rounding radius re/b, and the model degenerates to Young-Laplace equation when re/b = 0. The analytical solution is verified with 2D numerical simulations (Fig. 3c and S5b) and the predicted BPs for different CBV widths show better consistency with the measured values in vitro tests compared to previous model without considering the rounding edges (Fig. 3d and S7)
Uncertainties in measuring s-SPSGs
Uncertainties in the measured s-SPSGs involve contributions from slight variations in the critical dimensions of the CBVs and from spatial heterogeneity in the characteristics of sweat glands across the skin. Concerning the first, in vitro tests reveal that percentage variations in the BPs for nominally identical CBVs lie in the range of ~10% (Table S1.) The second contributions arise from a device architecture that uses 12 separate inlets, each of which captures sweat from a different region of the skin. In tests involving 25 min of cycling exercise, devices with identical CBVs for all inlets (Fig. S8a) show bursting in 10 (out of 12), 11 (out of 12) and 1 (out of 12) CBVs with BPs of 1.7, 1.9 and 2.0 kPa, respectively (Fig. S8b). In this case, 1.9 kPa corresponds to the s-SPSG of the region. The device with separated CBVs at 1.7, 1.9, 2.0 kPa and higher BP will yield a s-SPSG of 1.9 with 84% probability. The effect of different behaviors of individual sweat glands and variations in their density contribute in a minor way to uncertainties in the s-SPSG determined from a region with a statistically meaningful number of glands.
This type of uncertainty can be avoided with a device design that includes a single inlet (Fig. S9) and a single, interconnected microfluidic structure. Here, the first CBV has the lowest bursting pressure and largest width. The BP increases monotonically, by virtue of decreasing widths, in a clockwise direction around an interconnected array. The sweat fills the system up to the CBV that has a BP larger than the s-SPSG. For certain applications, this design might provide an attractive alternative to the system in Fig. 1. The disadvantage is that sweat flow from a single region must be sufficient to fill the device. All in situ measurements of s-SPSG used the device design with separate inlets.
In situ measurement of the s-SPSG in various human subject studies
Human testing involved evaluations on healthy young adult volunteers during exercise with three different types of fitness equipment (stationary bikes, elliptical trainers and treadmills) and in at-rest sessions in a sauna room. The studies include devices mounted on the forearm, upper arm, chest, upper back, lower back and thigh (Fig. 4a), with pressure measurements after 20 min in each scenario. The pressures correspond, then, to the maximum values during this interval. The inlet areas are each 7 mm2. Since the densities of sweat glands at the forearm, upper arm, chest, upper back, lower back and thigh are 108, 102, 91, 106, 132 and 102 glands/cm2, respectively42, the number of sweat glands per inlet is 7 – 9. (Experiments with devices that have inlets with diameters of 2, 3 and 4 mm, in both exercising on an elliptical machine and sitting in a sauna room, show comparable s-SPSGs (Fig. S10). Additional control experiments to examine the effects of compensatory sweating that arise from blockage of sweat glands by the adhesive with devices that have diameters of 30, 40 and 50 mm mounted on forearm, upper arm and chest, as summarized in Fig. S11a. Although the 40 mm case yielded the highest SPSG and the 50 mm yielded the lowest (Fig. S11b), the variations are small and statistically insignificant and likely arise from biological variabilities in sweat gland physiology and density.
From the fundamental physics of driven fluid flow, the pressure differential from the end of the duct to the outside air is proportional to sweat flow rate43. Studies confirm the secretory pressure of sweat glands tends to increase with sweat rate36. Our measurements of s-SPSGs and sweat rate at the forearm is consistent with such behavior, although the data exhibit significant scatter (Fig. S12).
During cycling, the s-SPSG is lowest at the upper arm and lower back (1.8±0.1 kPa) and highest at the thigh (3.2±0.3 kPa). During elliptical exercise, the s-SPSG is lowest at the lower back (1.8±0.1 kPa) and highest at the forearm (5.6±0.5 kPa). Averaged from six positions across the body, the elliptical exercise and the sauna produce the highest (from 5.6±0.5 to 1.8±0.1 kPa) and lowest (from 3.2±0.3 to 1.8±0.1 kPa) pressures (Fig. 4c). As an attempt to explain these differences, consider that the pressure generated at the location a sweat gland is given by
(7) |
where σ is the osmotic reflection coefficient, R is the ideal gas constant, T is the temperature of the body, and ΔC is the difference in concentration between sweat and plasma, which defines the osmolality34. The measured concentrations of chloride in sweat generated by cycling and sitting in a sauna are 65±2 and 66±2 mM, respectively. These values are identical, within experimental uncertainties, and are therefore unable to account for the observed differences in pressure. Another possibility is that physical movement of the muscles and surrounding tissues, and other physiological processes such as vasodilation associated with vigorous exercise, can increase the s-SPSG. Measurements using devices placed on the forehead and behind the ear, where motion effects are minimal, show s-SPSG values lower than those on other regions of the body (Fig. S13). The acceleration from the movement of body could, conceivably, affect the CBVs and therefore measured pressure44–46. Control experiments performed with device mounted on PDMS substrates moved rapidly and deformed by stretching and compressing, while applying constant fluid pressure to the CBVs (Fig. S14), show an absence of motion related effects on the operation of the CBVs. The small volume of sweat in the inlet channels (0.1 µl) helps to minimize such inertial effects (Fig. S5c).
The overall SPSGs lie between 1.8±0.1 and 5.6±0.5 kPa. These values are smaller than those (41.4 ±18.6 kPa) reported previously in tests that require introduction of a micropipette into the sweat duct while artificially stimulating sweat with a chemical inducing agent (pilocarpine). These differences are likely due to the combined effects of pressure drops along the duct and differences between natural and induced sweating.
From cycling tests, all three subjects produced the highest s-SPSG at the thigh and upper arm (3.2±0.3 kPa), at the chest and lower back (4.3±0.3 kPa) and at the upper arm and lower back (5.6±0.5 kPa). One subject produced the lowest s-SPSG at the lower back (1.8±0.1 kPa) and two others at the thigh (1.8±0.1 kPa) (Fig. 4d). All subjects examined here showed s-SPSGs between 1.8±0.1 and 5.6±0.5 kPa. The wide range suggests that this parameter might have utility in studies of exercise physiology. For example, muscles produce 90% of the metabolic heat during exercise47 and increases in body temperature trigger vasodilation and sweating48. Because the sweat pressure follows from interactions between sweat and plasma in blood, variations in body temperature and blood flow might contribute to differences in s-SPSG49, 50. These effects, and those related to age (i.e. the oldest subject produced the smallest range (1.8±0.1 – 3.2±0.3 kPa) from six positions across the body and the lowest average s-SPSG (2.4±0.5 kPa), might be interesting to explore in future work.
Conclusions
In summary, the results presented here show that arrays of capillary bursting valves in epidermal microfluidic devices can form a basis of platforms for convenient, routine measurements of secretory fluidic pressures generated at the surface of the skin by eccrine sweat glands. These systems can be non-invasively applied to nearly any region of the body, without irritation or discomfort or constraint in activity. Systematic experimental and theoretical studies establish a basis for quantitatively using these devices in a range of scenarios. Investigations with volunteer subjects illustrate measurement capabilities in a variety of sweating conditions, across different body locations and individuals. These measurements, particularly when coupled with analysis of key biomarkers in sweat, provide many opportunities for future studies of sweat physiology.
Methods
Device Fabrication
Spin coating KMPR 1010 (Microchem, MA, United States) at 3000 rpm for 30 s formed a 15 µm thick layer of photoresist on a silicon wafer. After photolithography and development, deep reactive ion etching (STS Pegasus ICP-DRIE, SPTS Technologies Ltd) created trenches to depth of 90 µm on the surface of the wafer. Next, spin coating formed a thin layer of PMMA (Microchem, MA, United States) on the mold to facilitate release of the cured PDMS. Pouring a prepolymer to PDMS (10:1 base:curing agent, Sylgard 184, Dow corning, MI, United States) on the mold, spin coating at 200 rpm and partially curing (70 °C oven for 15 min) formed the channel layer (thickness ~400 µm). Color change associated with water contact of a solution of 100 mg/mL cobalt (II) chloride dissolved in 2% polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate (pHEMA, wt%) hydrogel (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, United States) introduced into each of the microreservoirs by pipetting facilitated visualization of their filling with sweat (Fig. S5a). Small volumes, i.e. 0.3 µl, of sweat changed the color of the indicator from blue to pink, sufficient for easy observation by eye (Fig. S5b). A similar spin casting and partial curing process, but at 400 rpm on a bare wafer, yielded the capping layer (thickness ~200 µm). A 1 mm diameter circular punch formed holes at the inlets of the channel layer. A 8 mm diameter circular punch defined a hole through the channel and capping layers at the center of the device. Completing the curing process with the capping and channel layers in contact PDMS and another 10 min bonded the aligned pre-cured capping layer and fully-cured microfluidic channel layer. Corona treatment of the bottom surface of the device allowed bonding of an adhesive layer with a 3 mm diameter circular hole at the center (PC2723U, ScapaHealthcare). The openings for the inlets have diameters of 1 mm.
In vitro measurement of bursting pressure
A microfluidic control system (Fluigent MFCS, Villejuif, France) generated flows of artificial sweat for in vitro measurements of BPs. The artificial sweat consisted of an aqueous solution of 22 × 10−3 M of urea, 2.2 × 10−3 M of glucose, 3.8 × 10−3 M of potassium, 31 × 10−3 M of sodium, 58 × 10−3 M of chloride, and 5.2 × 10−3 M of calcium (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The microfluidic control system supplied pressure to the liquid using air pump and measures the pressure of the liquid (Fig. S5). After setting a desired pressure using the microfluidic control system, and maintaining this pressure for ~10 s, observation by eye identified the threshold for bursting of the valve.
In situ measurement of secretory pressure from human trials
Testing involved healthy young adults as volunteers. Testing of the device on voluntary human subjects were done during normal physical activity and represented no additional human-subject risk. All subjects provided their consent prior to participation. Rubbing with a soft pad soaked in alcohol prepared the skin to ensure robust adhesion to the device. The exercising routine included cycling, elliptical and treadmill machine for 20 min at an approximate constant working load at room temperature (20 °C). The thermal exposures involved sitting at rest in a dry sauna at 50 °C for 20 min. For measuring sweat rate, we used a hydrophilic foam dressing and measured the weight of foam before and after exercise.
In vitro measurement of chloride concentration
A colorimetric chloride assay kit defined the chloride concentration (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, United States). The chrono-sampling device introduced in a previous study captured sweat during exercising and thermal exposure14. Dilution of 3 µl of sweat with 27 µl deionized water produced samples for analysis. Mixing 3 µl of sample with 27 µl of solution from the assay kit allowed colorimetric analysis based on spectroscopic measurements (NanoDrop) of the absorbance at a wavelength of 620 nm. Prepared solutions of 25, 50, 75, 100 and 125 mM sodium chloride served to set the standard curve for determining chloride concentration.
Contact angle measurement
A contact angle goniometer (VCA-Optima XE, MA, United States of America) yielded static contact angles and critical advancing angles of de-ionized water on PDMS. An automated dispenser yielded 1 µl droplets for these measurements.
Image acquisition
A scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-4800-II, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and a digital microscope (VHX-5000, KEYENCE, Osaka, Japan) produced micrographs of the devices.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work utilized Northwestern University Micro/Nano Fabrication Facility (NUFAB), which is partially supported by Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource (NSF NNCI-1542205), the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (NSF DMR-1121262), the State of Illinois, and Northwestern University. Y.X. gratefully acknowledges support from the Ryan Fellowship and the Northwestern University International Institute for Nanotechnology. Y.H. acknowledges the support from NSF (Grant Nos. CMMI-1400169 and CMMI-1534120) and the NIH (Grant No. R01EB019337). We thank the Center for Bio-Integrated Electronics for support of this work
Contributor Information
Jungil Choi, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Yeguang Xue, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Wei Xia, State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Tyler R. Ray, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Jonathan Reeder, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Amay J. Bandodkar, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Daeshik Kang, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ajou University, San 5, Woncheon-Dong, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon 16499, Korea.
Shuai Xu, Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Yonggang Huang, Center for Bio-Integrated Electronics, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
John A. Rogers, Center for Bio-Integrated Electronics, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Neurological Surgery, Simpson Querrey Institute for Nano/biotechnology, McCormick School of Engineering and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
References
- 1.Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, Chan L, Rodgers M. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9 doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG. Ieee T Syst Man Cy C. 2010;40:1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu S, Zhang Y, Jia L, Mathewson KE, Jang KI, Kim J, Fu H, Huang X, Chava P, Wang R, Bhole S, Wang L, Na YJ, Guan Y, Flavin M, Han Z, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Science. 2014;344:70–74. doi: 10.1126/science.1250169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yeo WH, Kim YS, Lee J, Ameen A, Shi L, Li M, Wang S, Ma R, Jin SH, Kang Z, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Adv Mater. 2013;25:2773–2778. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao L, Zhang Y, Malyarchuk V, Jia L, Jang KI, Webb RC, Fu H, Shi Y, Zhou G, Shi L, Shah D, Huang X, Xu B, Yu C, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4938. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Webb RC, Bonifas AP, Behnaz A, Zhang YH, Yu KJ, Cheng HY, Shi MX, Bian ZG, Liu ZJ, Kim YS, Yeo WH, Park JS, Song JZ, Li YH, Huang YG, Gorbach AM, Rogers JA. Nat Mater. 2013;12:1078–1078. doi: 10.1038/nmat3755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kim J, Gutruf P, Chiarelli AM, Heo SY, Cho K, Xie ZQ, Banks A, Han S, Jang KI, Lee JW, Lee KT, Feng X, Huang YG, Fabiani M, Gratton G, Paik U, Rogers JA. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201604373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang X, Liu YH, Cheng HY, Shin WJ, Fan JA, Liu ZJ, Lu CJ, Kong GW, Chen K, Patnaik D, Lee SH, Hage-Ali S, Huang YG, Rogers JA. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24:3846–3854. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lipomi DJ, Vosgueritchian M, Tee BC, Hellstrom SL, Lee JA, Fox CH, Bao Z. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:788–792. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chortos A, Bao ZN. Mater Today. 2014;17:321–331. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee H, Choi TK, Lee YB, Cho HR, Ghaffari R, Wang L, Choi HJ, Chung TD, Lu N, Hyeon T, Choi SH, Kim DH. Nat Nanotechnol. 2016;11:566–572. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee S, Reuveny A, Reeder J, Lee S, Jin H, Liu Q, Yokota T, Sekitani T, Isoyama T, Abe Y, Suo Z, Someya T. Nat Nanotechnol. 2016;11:472–478. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yeo JC, Kenry, Lim CT. Lab on a Chip. 2016;16:4082–4090. doi: 10.1039/c6lc00926c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choi J, Kang D, Han S, Kim SB, Rogers JA. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Koh A, Kang D, Xue Y, Lee S, Pielak RM, Kim J, Hwang T, Min S, Banks A, Bastien P, Manco MC, Wang L, Ammann KR, Jang KI, Won P, Han S, Ghaffari R, Paik U, Slepian MJ, Balooch G, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:366ra165. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heikenfeld J. Electroanalysis. 2016;28:1242–1249. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang YH, Xing SY, Fang ZC, Li RY, Koo H, Pan TR. Lab on a Chip. 2017;17:926–935. doi: 10.1039/c6lc01522k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matzeu G, Fay C, Vaillant A, Coyle S, Diamond D. Ieee T Bio-Med Eng. 2016;63:1672–1680. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2477676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coyle S, Morris D, Lau K-T, Diamond D, Taccini N, Costanzo D, Salvo P, Di Francesco F, Trivella MG, Porchet J-A. 2009 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee H, Song C, Hong YS, Kim MS, Cho HR, Kang T, Shin K, Choi SH, Hyeon T, Kim DH. Sci Adv. 2017;3 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bandodkar AJ, Jia WZ, Yardimci C, Wang X, Ramirez J, Wang J. Anal Chem. 2015;87:394–398. doi: 10.1021/ac504300n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gao W, Emaminejad S, Nyein HY, Challa S, Chen K, Peck A, Fahad HM, Ota H, Shiraki H, Kiriya D, Lien DH, Brooks GA, Davis RW, Javey A. Nature. 2016;529:509–514. doi: 10.1038/nature16521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Imani S, Bandodkar AJ, Mohan AM, Kumar R, Yu S, Wang J, Mercier PP. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11650. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim J, Jeerapan I, Imani S, Cho TN, Bandodkar A, Cinti S, Mercier PP, Wang J. Acs Sensors. 2016;1:1011–1019. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bandodkar AJ, Molinnus D, Mirza O, Guinovart T, Windmiller JR, Valdes-Ramirez G, Andrade FJ, Schoning MJ, Wang J. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;54:603–609. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rose DP, Ratterman ME, Griffin DK, Hou LL, Kelley-Loughnane N, Naik RR, Hagen JA, Papautsky I, Heikenfeld JC. Ieee T Bio-Med Eng. 2015;62:1457–1465. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2369991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Koh A, Kang D, Xue Y, Lee S, Pielak RM, Kim J, Hwang T, Min S, Banks A, Bastien P, Manco MC, Wang L, Ammann KR, Jang KI, Won P, Han S, Ghaffari R, Paik U, Slepian MJ, Balooch G, Huang YG, Rogers JA. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nyein HY, Gao W, Shahpar Z, Emaminejad S, Challa S, Chen K, Fahad HM, Tai LC, Ota H, Davis RW, Javey A. Acs Nano. 2016;10:7216–7224. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gao W, Nyein HYY, Shahpar Z, Fahad HM, Chen K, Emaminejad S, Gao YJ, Tai LC, Ota H, Wu E, Bullock J, Zeng YP, Lien DH, Javey A. Acs Sensors. 2016;1:866–874. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moyer J, Wilson D, Finkelshtein I, Wong B, Potts R. Diabetes Technol The. 2012;14:398–402. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sakaguchi K, Hirota Y, Hashimoto N, Ogawa W, Hamaguchi T, Matsuo T, Miyagawa J-I, Namba M, Sato T, Okada S. Journal of diabetes science and technology. 2013;7:678–688. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Buono MJ, Lee NVL, Miller PW. J Physiol Sci. 2010;60:103–107. doi: 10.1007/s12576-009-0073-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Biagi S, Ghimenti S, Onor M, Bramanti E. Biomedical Chromatography. 2012;26:1408–1415. doi: 10.1002/bmc.2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sonner Z, Wilder E, Heikenfeld J, Kasting G, Beyette F, Swaile D, Sherman F, Joyce J, Hagen J, Kelley-Loughnane N, Naik R. Biomicrofluidics. 2015;9:031301. doi: 10.1063/1.4921039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Farrell PM, Rosenstein BJ, White TB, Accurso FJ, Castellani C, Cutting GR, Durie PR, LeGrys VA, Massie J, Parad RB, Rock MJ, Campbell PW. J Pediatr. 2008;153:S4–S14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schulz IJ. J Clin Invest. 1969;48:1470–1477. doi: 10.1172/JCI106113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Eddings MA, Johnson MA, Gale BK. J Micromech Microeng. 2008;18 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho H, Kim HY, Kang JY, Kim TS. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2007;306:379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang CP, Lu J, Seon H, Lee AP, Flanagan LA, Kim HY, Putnam AJ, Jeon NL. Lab Chip. 2009;9:1740–1748. doi: 10.1039/b818401a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fonseca SF, Teles MC, Ribeiro VGC, Magalhaes FC, Mendonca VA, Peixoto MFD, Leite LHR, Coimbra CC, Lacerda ACR. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2015;48:1122–1129. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yuan Y, Lee TR. Surface science techniques. Springer; 2013. pp. 3–34. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Taylor NA, Machado-Moreira CA. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013;2:4. doi: 10.1186/2046-7648-2-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hou LL, Hagen J, Wang X, Papautsky I, Naik R, Kelley-Loughnane N, Heikenfeld J. Lab Chip. 2013;13:1868–1875. doi: 10.1039/c3lc41231h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yoo K, Park U, Kim J. Sensor Actuat a-Phys. 2011;166:234–240. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kuo JC, Kuo PH, Lai YT, Ma CW, Lu SS, Yang YJJ. J Microelectromech S. 2013;22:646–654. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huang CY, Sun P, Lee MS, Wu SY, Shieh YC, Hsu WY. Ieee Sens J. 2016;16:654–661. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wenger CB. Exercise and Core Temperature. Military Performance Division US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine Natick; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Charkoudian N. Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:603–612. doi: 10.4065/78.5.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Casa DJ, Becker SM, Ganio MS, Brown CM, Yeargin SW, Roti MW, Siegler J, Blowers JA, Glaviano NR, Huggins RA, Armstrong LE, Maresh CM. J Athl Training. 2007;42:333–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kondo N, Takano S, Aoki K, Shibasaki M, Tominaga H, Inoue Y. Acta Physiol Scand. 1998;164:71–78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.1998.00407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.