Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2017 Mar 16;24(6):1430–1436. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.03.008

Efficient and reproducible in vitro regeneration of Solanum lycopersicum and assessment genetic uniformity using flow cytometry and SPAR methods

Abdulrahman A Alatar a,1, Mohammad Faisal a,⁎,1, Eslam M Abdel-Salam a, Tomas Canto b,c, Quaiser Saquib b,c,d, Saad B Javed a, Mohamed A El-Sheikh a,e, Abdulaziz A Al-Khedhairy b,c,d
PMCID: PMC5562467  PMID: 28855842

Abstract

In the present study, we develop an efficient and reproducible in vitro regeneration system for two cultivars viz., Jamila and Tomaland of Solanum lycopersicum L., an economically important vegetable crop throughout the world. Sterilization of seeds with 2.5% (v/v) NaOCl was found to be most effective, about 97% of seeds germinated on cotton in magenta box moistened with sterile half strength (½)Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. Regeneration efficiency of cotyledonary leaf (CL) and cotyledonary node (CN) explants derived from 08 days old aseptic seedling were assessed on MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of auxins and cytokinin. CL explants were found more responsive in comparison to CN in both the cultivars. Types of basal media were also assessed and found to have a significant effect on shoot regeneration. Highest regeneration frequency and maximum number of shoots were standardized from CL explants on MS medium supplied with 6-benzyl adenine (BA; 5.0 µM), indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; 2.5 µM) and Kinetin (Kin; 10.0 µM). In vitro regenerated microshoots were rooted on ½MS medium containing 0.5 µM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). Regenerated plantlets with well-developed roots and shoot system were successfully acclimated to ex vitro condition. Genetic uniformity of tissue culture raised plantlets was first time evaluated using flow cytometry and single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods viz., DAMD and ISSR. No significant changes in ploidy level and nuclear DNA content profile were observed between in vitro propagated plants and normal plants of both the cultivars. Similarly, the SPAR analysis also revealed monomorphic banding patterns in regenerated plantlets of S. lycopersicum verifying their genetic uniformity and clonal fidelity. This efficient regeneration system can be used as a fast and reproducible method for genetic transformation of this important vegetable crop.

Keywords: In vitro regeneration, Tissue culture, Genetic fidelity, Flow cytometry, SPAR method

1. Introduction

Solanum lycopersicum L. (Solanaceae) commonly known as ‘tomato’ is a one of the most important vegetable crops in the world (Bhatia et al., 2004; Foolad, 2004). It is considered as ‘poor man’s orange, because of having substantial quantities of mineral and vitamins (Devi et al., 2008). It is an important nutritive crop and can be grown in short period of time with high productivity. Cultivation of this important crop is increasing day by day because of its high economic values in the vegetables market. It is a rich source of minerals (iron), vitamins (A and C), organic acid, essential amino acids, dietary fibers and can be used in preserved foodstuffs like ketch-up, sauce, chutney, soup, paste etc. (Block et al., 1992; Gerster, 1997, Rao and Agarwal, 2000). Tomato productivity in Saudi Arabia is below the international levels due to various constraints in cultivation. Biotic stresses are contributing significantly to this low productivity both in open field and polyhouse cultivation. Cultivation of tomato suffers from serious losses due to infestation by insects and pests and the diseases they transmit. Therefore, there is an urgent for biotechnological interventions to increase the productivity of this crop. Culture of plant cell, tissues in vitro is an integral part plant biotechnology, which has been be exploited for in vitro regeneration and genetic improvement of this crop, is the first and quintessential step towards genetic transformation of plants. Without a reliable, reproducible and efficient system to regenerate genetically identical plants from a small mass of transformed cells, it is not possible to produce a complete genetically modified plant. There are several reports on adventitious in vitro cultivation in tomato from various explants (Compton and Veillux, 1991; Moghaleb et al., 1999, Brichkova et al., 2002, Raziuddin et al., 2004; Mohamed et al., 2010; Liza et al., 2013). However, improvement and standardization of in vitro regeneration and shoot multiplication protocols is still imperative due to its diverse morphogenic potential of different explants and genotypes (Tomsone et al., 2004).

However, there are some limitations of in vitro technique because of the occurrence of spontaneous genetic or epigenetic changes leading to cytological abnormalities, phenotypic mutations, sequence changes (Kaeppler et al., 2000), and DNA methylation in in vitro regenerated plants. These variations may affect the quality and quantity of plants as well as genetic transformation through various approaches. The present study was aimed to formulate an efficient and reproducible regeneration system of this economically important crop by optimization of various parameters viz., genotypes, sterilizing agents, types of explants, medium and auxin and cytokinin balance for in vitro multiplication and plant regeneration. Furthermore, the genetic stability of the in vitro developed plants was also assessed for the first time by flow cytometry and SPAR methods (DAMD; directed amplification of minisatellite DNA and ISSR; intersimple sequence repeat polymorphic DNA).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental materials and surface sterilization

Certified mature seeds of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cvs. Jamila and Tomaland were purchase from local seed market were used as starting experimental materials. The seeds were thoroughly washed under tap water in the laboratory for 30 min, followed by soaking in 5% (v/v) liquid detergent solution for 5 min. After several washes with sterile ultrapure water, the seeds of both the cultivars were surface sterilized with different sterilizing agents viz., mercuric chloride (Merck, Germany), sodium hypochlorite (Clorox Co. Saudi Arabia) at different concentration and time of exposure (Table 1). The sterilized seeds were immediately washed 4–5 times with sterile ultrapure water.

Table 1.

Effect of HgCl2 and NaOCl on sterilization of seeds of Solanum lycopersicum L. cvs. Jamila and Tomaland on ½MS medium.

HgCl2 (% w/v) NaOCl (% v/v) Treatment duration (min) Germination (%)
 Remarks
Jamila Tomaland
0.01 – 3 92 90 Contaminated
0.1 – 3 48 47 Delayed germination
0.2 – 3 0 0 No germination
0.5 – 3 0 0 No germination
1.0 – 3 0 0 No germination
0.5 10 92 90 Contaminated
2.5 10 97 96 No contamination
5.0 10 76 76 Delayed germination
10.0 10 44 42 Delayed germination
Open in a new tab

Evaluation were made from 8 days old culture.

2.2. Seed germination and growth conditions

The sterilized seeds were aseptically transferred on cotton in magenta vessels moistened with half strength (½) Murashige and Skoog [1962; (MS)] medium. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 using 1 N NaOH or 1 N HCl before being autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min. The cultured seeds were incubated in dark for 48 h and thereafter maintained under 50 µmol m–2 s–1 light provided by cool white fluorescent lamp for a photoperiod of 16 h at 24 ± 2 °C in a growth chamber. Data on seed germination were recorded after 08 days of inoculation.

2.3. In vitro shoot initiation and multiplication

For in vitro shoot induction, cotyledonary leaf (CL) and cotyledonary node (CN) explants of both the cultivars were excised form 8 days old aseptic seedlings and transferred to MS medium supplemented with BA (5.0 µM) and IBA (0.5 µM) and kept in dark for two days at 24 ± 2 °C. After two days, the explants were cultured on MS medium supplemented different with concentration and combination plant growth regulators [6-benzyladenine (BA; 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10 µM) Kinetin (Kin; 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10 µM) and indole-3 butyric acid (IBA; 0.5, 2.5 and 5.0 µM). All of the cultures were transferred onto the fresh medium after every two weeks. The frequency with which explants produced shoots and the number of shoots per explant was recorded after eight weeks of culture.

After standardizing the most suitable growth regulator combination, different plant growth media was also evaluated and compared to perceive the best suitable media for regeneration and multiplication. Gamborg medium [Gamborg et al., 1968; (B5)], Nitsch medium [Nitsch and Nitsch, 1969; (NN)] and White medium [White, 1943; (W)] were used for in vitro shoot regeneration from cotyledonary leaf and cotyledonary node.

2.4. Rooting of regenerated shoots

In vitro regenerated shoots measuring about 4–5 cm in length were excised individually under aseptic condition and transferred to half-strength (½)MS medium supplemented with NAA, IAA or IBA (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 µM) for in vitro rhizogenesis. Data were recorded on the percentage of shoots forming roots and the mean number of roots per shoot after four weeks of transfer onto the rooting medium.

2.5. Ex vitro transfer and acclimatization

Regenerated plantlets with well-developed roots were removed from culture vessels, washed gently under tap water to remove the adhering media and then transferred to pots containing sterile potting soil (Planta Guard). For hardening the potted plants were kept in a growth chamber maintained at 24 ± 2 °C with diffuse light 50 µmol m–2 s–1 of 16/8 h photoperiod. The plants were irrigated with half-strength MS salt solution for two weeks and then with sterile water for next 2 weeks. After 1 month, the successfully hardened plants were transferred to glasshouse under normal day length conditions.

2.6. Flow cytometry analysis of regenrants

Ploidy level of in vitro regenerated plants were determined using a Flow cytometer (Muse® Cell Analyzer, Merck Millipore, US) and compared with seed grown plants. Nuclei were mechanically isolated from 100 mg fresh leaf tissues by chopping with a sharp scalpel blade (No. 21) in 1 ml of Galbraith buffer (pH 7.0) containing 45 mM MgCl2, 30 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM MOPS and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Galbraith et al., 1983). After chopping nuclear suspensions were filtered using double-layered 28 µm nylon meshes and mix with 50 µg/ml of propridium iodide (PI, Sigma, USA) solution for 15 min. RNase (50 µg/ml) (Sigma, USA) was also added to counteract staining of double stranded RNA. All assessments were repeated thrice for each leaf sample and contained a minimum of 5000 nuclei per run.

2.7. Genomic DNA extraction and PCR amplification

In vitro regenerated plants of tomato were randomly selected to evaluate their genetic homogeneity using DAMD and ISSR markers and compared with ex vitro plant. Genomic DNA was extracted from each plant using 300 mg of leaf tissues using modified cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method as described by Doyle and Doyle (1987). Purified total DNA was quantified and its quality verified by nanodrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop™ C2000c, Thermo Scientific). The integrity and size of DNA were visualized using 1% agarose gel, electrophoresed at 100 V for 60 min. Each DNA sample was diluted to 25 ng/µl in ultrapure water (Milli QR, Merck Millipore, US) and stored at 4 °C. Micropropagated plants were assessed for genetic uniformity using 09 ISSR and 5 DAMD primers ((Gene Link, New York, USA) for their clear and reproducible banding patterns.

PCR reactions were performed and carried out as described by Williams et al. (1990). A total of 20 µL reaction mixtures comprising of PCR buffer (1×), dNTPs mix (0.2 mM), MgCl2 (2.0 mM), Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 Unit) (Fermentas, MD, USA), primers (5 pmol) and 1 µL genomic DNA was prepared. The PCR reaction was performed using Thermal cycler (T-100™ Thermal Cycler, Bio-Rad, USA) with an initial DNA denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C (30 s), primer annealing at 46–58 °C (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4) for 45 s, primer extension at 72 °C for 90 s and final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Electrophoresis was done to fractioned the amplified products in ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL) supplemented 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels electrophoresed at 60 V for 2.0 h 1X TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA) buffer and photographed using a Gel Documentation System (G-Box, Syngene, UK).

Table 2.

Evaluation of auxin and cytokinin on in vitro regeneration from cotyledonary leaf (CL) explants of S. lycopersicum cvs. Jamila and Tomaland.

Plant growth regulators (μM)
 Regeneration %
 Mean number of shoots/explant
BA IBA KIN Jamila Tomaland Jamila Tomaland
0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0f 0.0 ± 0.0f
0.5 2.5 10.0 45 40 2.5 ± 0.15e 2.4 ± 0.15e
2.5 2.5 10.0 65 60 4.0 ± 0.25c 3.8 ± 0.20bc
5.0 2.5 10.0 93 90 6.5 ± 0.50a 5.8 ± 0.76a
10.0 2.5 10.0 75 70 3.8 ± 0.20c 3.6 ± 0.35 cd
5.0 0.5 10.0 70 70 2.6 ± 0.35e 2.4 ± 0.17e
5.0 5.0 10.0 55 55 3.0 ± 0.25de 3.0 ± 0.15de
5.0 2.5 0.5 40 35 3.5 ± 0.24 cd 3.2 ± 0.26 cd
5.0 2.5 2.5 52 50 4.0 ± 0.35c 3.7 ± 0.25bc
5.0 2.5 5.0 75 70 4.9 ± 0.40b 4.3 ± 0.36b
Open in a new tab

Data represent mean ± SD. Means followed by the same letter within columns are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). Evaluation were made from 8 weeks old culture.

Table 3.

Evaluation of auxin and cytokinin on in vitro regeneration from cotyledonary node (CN) explants of S. lycopersicum cvs. Jamila and Tomaland.

Plant growth regulators (μM)
 Regeneration %
 Mean number of shoots/explant
BA IBA KIN Jamila Tomaland Jamila Tomaland
0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0f 0.0 ± 0.0f
0.5 2.5 10.0 41 40 2.3 ± 0.26e 2.1 ± 0.28e
2.5 2.5 10.0 60 55 3.5 ± 0.51bc 3.3 ± 0.57bc
5.0 2.5 10.0 91 90 5.3 ± 0.57a 4.9 ± 0.60a
10.0 2.5 10.0 70 70 3.4 ± 0.41bcd 3.2 ± 0.46bcd
5.0 0.5 10.0 75 75 2.4 ± 0.36e 2.3 ± 0.29e
5.0 5.0 10.0 60 60 2.7 ± 0.25de 2.6 ± 0.12de
5.0 2.5 0.5 40 43 2.8 ± 0.51cde 2.5 ± 0.68cde
5.0 2.5 2.5 55 50 3.5 ± 0.50bc 3.3 ± 0.32bc
5.0 2.5 5.0 70 70 4.2 ± 0.26b 4.0 ± 0.29b
Open in a new tab

Data represent mean ± SD. Means followed by the same letter within columns are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). Evaluation were made from 8 weeks old culture.

Table 4.

Evaluation of auxin on in vitro rooting from regenerated microshoots of S. lycopersicum.

Plant growth regulators (μM)
 % Regeneration Mean number of roots/explant
IAA IBA NAA
0 0 0 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0f
0.1 – – 45 1.5 ± 0.29def
0.5 – – 75 2.6 ± 0.57bc
2.0 – – 60 2.0 ± 0.60cde
5.0 – – 35 1.2 ± 0.46ef
– 0.1 – 65 2.2 ± 0.28 cd
– 0.5 – 90 4.1 ± 0.15a
– 2.0 – 80 3.1 ± 0.68b
– 5.0 – 50 2.3 ± 0.32bcd
0.1 40 1.2 ± 0.32ef
0.5 70 2.4 ± 0.32bc
2.0 50 1.8 ± 0.32cdef
5.0 35 1.1 ± 0.32e
Open in a new tab

Data represent mean ± SD. Means followed by the same letter within columns are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). Evaluation were made from 8 weeks old culture.

2.8. Data analysis

The data were recorded after 8 weeks for in vitro regeneration and 4 weeks for rooting experiments. All the experiments were performed in triplicate with 20 explants for every treatment. The data recorded were statistically evaluated using, SPSS Version 24 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA) and means values were compared using a multiple range test (DMRT) at 5% level of significance.

3. Results and discussion

Contamination of in vitro cultures from various sources is the one of major obstacle for success of plan tissue culture. Sterilization of seeds is an essential pre-requisite to obtained the aseptic seedling for any in vitro regeneration experiment. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of two sterilizing agents viz., mercuric chloride (HgCl2), and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on efficiency of seeds germination in S. lycopersicum (Table 1) Tomato seeds surface sterilized with HgCl2 (0.1–0.5%) exhibited the complete inhibition of seed germination. While, at lower concentration (0.01%) all the cultured seeds were contaminated. Inhibition of seeds germination at higher concentration might be due to peroxiding action of chloride atoms and ions that combines with proteins causing the death of biological organisms (Pauling, 1955). All the concentrations of sodium hypochlorite solution used for surface disinfection has significant effect on seed germination. Among the different concentration of sodium hypochlorite used for surface sterilization and the maximum aseptic germination was achieved at 2.5% in both the cultivars with uniforms seedling growth on cotton in magenta vessels moistened with half-strength (½) Murashige and Skoog medium after 08 days of inoculation. While the lowest percentage of seed germination were recorded while using the 10% of sodium hypochlorite for sterilization (Table 1).

Growth of in vitro cultured tissues and plant regeneration, are significantly influenced by the genotypes and explant. It has been very clearly observed that data generated during in vitro culture varied from one cultivar to another, and it is probably true to say that effects of genotype imposes one of the utmost constraints for in vitro regeneration and genetic transformation of plants. In vitro regeneration of tomato has been greatly influenced by the genotype, explants, and plant growth regulator used in culture medium. Several cytokinin and auxin combinations could induce shoot proliferation in tomato but it varies with cultivar to cultivar. Regeneration efficiency of cotyledonary leaf (CL) and cotyledonary node (CN) explants were assessed and compared in two cultivars of S. lycopersicum viz., Jamila and Tomaland. CL and CN explants of both the cultivars were excised form 8 days old aseptic seedlings and transferred to MS medium supplemented with BA (5.0 µM) and IBA (0.5 µM) and kept in dark for two days at 24 ± 2 °C. After two days, the explants were cultured on MS medium supplemented different with concentration and combination plant growth regulators [6-benzyladenine (BA; 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10 µM) Kinetin (Kin; 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 10 µM) and indole-3 butyric acid (IBA; 0.5, 2.5 and 5.0 µM). The morphogenic responses of CL and CN explants derived from 8 days old aseptic seedlings of both the cultivars to auxin and cytokinin combinations are depicted in Table 2, Table 3. There was no shoot induction response was observed when both the explants were cultured on hormone-free MS medium. While both the explants were cultured on MS medium augmented with different cytokinin, BA, Kin (0.5, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 µM) in combination with IBA (0.5, 2.5 and 5.0 µM) produced a differential response with regard to in vitro shoot regeneration. CL explants of both the cultivars were found more responsive in comparison to CN explants which may due to the variation in levels of endogenous growth regulator. The highest frequency of regeneration (Jamila 93%, Tomaland 90%) and maximum number of shoots (Jamila 6.5 ± 0.50; Tomaland 5.8 ± 0.76) were achieved from CL explants on MS medium supplemented 5.0 µM BA + 2.5 µM IBA + 10.0 µM Kin (Table 2). Whereas from CN explants the shoot regeneration frequency (Jamila 91% and Tomaland 90%) and maximum number shoots (Jamila 5.3 ± 0.57 and Tomaland 4.9 ± 0.60) were obtained on a similar medium (Table 3). Synergistic effect of a cytokinin in combination with an auxin has been demonstrated in several solanaceous crops, such as Capsicum annum (Ellendula et al., 2016), Solanum villosum (Iftikhar et al., 2015) Solanum tuberosum (Lijana et al., 2012), Solanum melongena (Robinson and Saranya, 2013). In agreement with these reports, the finding of our study also exemplifies the positive modification of shoot induction efficacy obtained by employing the combination of auxin and cytokinin in vitro.

Different tissue culture media were also examined and compared to detect the best suitable for recipe for in vitro shoot induction and plant regeneration. Standardization of appropriate culture medium with use of optimum plant growth regulators is an important and critical factor for maximum morphogenic response of an explant. Gamborg medium (Gamborg et al., 1968; B5), Nitsch medium (Nitsch and Nitsch, 1969; NN) and White medium (White, 1943; W) in addition to MS medium were used and analyzed comparatively with optimum concentration of BA (5.0 µM), IBA (2.5 µM) and Kin (10.0 µM) for in vitro shoot regeneration from CL explants in both the cultivars (Fig. 1). The better response was observed on MS over other nutrient media in terms of shoot per explant. While, the lowest numbers of shoots were recorded in White’s medium.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Evaluation of different medium on in vitro shoot regeneration from CN explants of S. lycopersicum cvs. Jamila (A) and Tomaland (B). Data represent mean ± SD. Bars and line values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). Evaluation were made from 8 weeks old culture.

In vitro regenerated shoots of S. lycopersicum measuring about >3 cm in length were excised from culture vessels and individually transferred to half-strength MS medium supplemented with IAA, IBA or NAA (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 µM) for root induction (Table 3). Among the different auxin used, IBA was found to most efficient auxin for in vitro root formation, while IAA was not very effective. Similarly, IBA has been described as the most effective auxin for root induction in Ocimum basilicum (Siddique and Anis, 2007), Cyamop-sis tetragonoloba (Ahmad et al., 2013), Dracaena sanderiana (Aslam et al., 2013) Solanum melongena (Robinson and Saranya, 2013), Mentha arvensis (Faisal et al., 2014) and Capsicum annum (Ellendula et al., 2016). Among the different IBA concentration used the highest frequency of rooted shoots (90%) and maximum number of roots (4.1 ± 0.15) per shoots were recorded in half strength (½)MS medium supplemented with 0.5 μM IBA (Table 3). While on increasing, or decreasing the auxin concentration beyond the optimum level there was significant reduction in rooting of microshoots were recorded. Regenerated plantlets with well-developed shoot and root system were successfully hardened off inside the growth room in a sterile potting soil (Planta Guard) for 1 month and eventually established field condition. About 90% of the regenerated plants survived following transfer from growth chamber to filed condition. The plants were growing normally and no phenotypic differences in respect to growth and morphological characteristics were observed.

Genetic uniformity is one of the most essential requisites in in vitro culture and regeneration of any plant species. Flow cytometric techniques and the directed amplification of minisatellite-region (DAMD) and single primer amplification (SPAR method SPAR methods (DAMD; directed amplification of minisatellite DNA and ISSR; intersimple sequence repeat polymorphic DNA) were used to evaluate the genetic uniformity of regenerated S. lycopersicum plantlets. The histograms obtained from flow cytometry analysis exhibited the similar peak of the nuclear DNA content corresponding to 2× from both the cultivars of tissue culture plants (Fig. 2) and seed derived plants, thereby validating there was no alteration in diploid status as well as the DNA content between in vitro regenerated plantlets and ex vitro grown plants. Similarly, flow cytometry is successfully employed in plant tissue culture to analyze the nuclear DNA content, genome size and ploidy stability (Obae and West, 2010, Mallon et al., 2010, Gantait and Sinniah, 2011, Ghimire et al., 2012, Vujovic et al., 2012, Faisal et al., 2014). DAMD and ISSR patterns of randomly selected regenerated plants was analyzed and compared with those of normal seed grown plant. Five DAMD primers (Table 5) were screened, and yielded clear, reproducible bands. For ISSR analysis, twelve primer (Table 6) were screened to assess the micropropagated plantlets and eleven primers produce a clear and scorable bands. It has been observed that the tested DAMD and ISSR primers produced monomorphic banding pattern in all the randomly selected plants, which confirming the genetic uniformity of in vitro regenerated plantlets of S. lycopersicum (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). The results are agreement with the findings of some recent reports ion genetic analysis in some plants viz., Gerbera jamesonii (Rathore et al., 2011) Cucumus sativus (Hu et al., 2011) and Mentha arvensis (Faisal et al., 2014) using DAMD and ISSR analysis.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Flow cytometric histogram of S. lycopersicum. (A) Tissue culture plants of cv. Jamila; (B) Normal plants of cv. Jamila; (C) Tissue culture plants of cv. Tomaland; (D) Normal plants of cv. Tomaland.

Table 5.

DAMD primers used to evaluate the extent genetic reliability of micropropagated S. lycopersicum plants.

S. no. Primers Primer sequence (5′–3) Ta (°C)
1. HBV3 GGTGAAGCACAGGTG 53
2. HBV5 GGTGTAGAGAGGGGT 56
3. HVR GCTCCTCCCCTCCT 50
4. M13 GAGGGTGGCGGTTCT 57
5. 33.6 GGAGGTGGGCA 52
Open in a new tab

Ta = annealing temperature.

Table 6.

ISSR primers used to evaluate the extent of genetic reliability of micropropagated S. lycopersicum plants.

S. no. Primers Primer sequence (5′–3) Ta (°C)
1. GL-811 GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG AC 49
2. GL-825 ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CT 46
3. GL-827 ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CG 50
4. GL-834 AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GYT 50
5. GL-841 GAG AGA GAG AGA GAG AYC 50
6. GL-855 ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CYT 50
7. GL-866 CTC CTC CTC CTC CTC CTC 55
8. GL-868 GAA GAA GAA GAA GAA GAA 46
9. GL-880 GGG TGG GGT GGG GTG 50
10. GL-889 DBD ACA CAC ACA CAC AC 46
11. GL-891 HVH TGT GTG TGT GTG TG 46
12. GL-900 ACT TCC CCA CAG GTT AAC ACA 58
Open in a new tab

Ta = annealing temperature.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

ISSR banding profiles of tissue culture raised plants of S. lycopersicum (A) Profiles generated using primer UBC-834. (B) Profiles generated using primer UBC-866. Lanes 1–5 randomly selected tissue culture plants; lane 6 normal plant; lane M Lambda DNA/EcoRI + HindIII marker.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

DAMD banding profiles of tissue culture raised plants of S. lycopersicum (A) Profiles generated using primer UBC-834. (B) Profiles generated using primer UBC-866. Lanes 1–5 randomly selected tissue culture plants; lane 6 normal plant; lane M Lambda DNA/EcoRI + HindIII marker.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study describes an efficient and reproducible method for successful in vitro regeneration of S. lycopersicum by optimizing various parameters, which revealed a significant advantage over the previous methods of in vitro culture of this valuable crop plants, and for the first time, the in vitro regenerated plants were analyzed using flow cytometry and SPAR methods, and it was clearly observed that these plants were genetically stable under in vitro conditions. This well-established protocol for S. lycopersicum from cotyledonary leaf explant will open new vistas in agriculture biotechnology by providing an unconventional steadfast system for in vitro regeneration and can be successfully utilize for genetic transformation studies in both the cultivars.

Acknowledgment

This project was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Award Number 12-BIO2919-02.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

References

  1. Ahmad N., Faisal M., Anis M. Role of PGR on in vitro shoot propagation in Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L. (Taub.): a drought tolerant grain legume Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei. 2013;24:7–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aslam J., Mujib A., Sharma M.P. In vitro micropropagation of Dracaena sanderiana Sander Ex Mast: an important indoor ornamental plant. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2013;20:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia P., Ashwath N., Senaratna T., Midmore D. Tissue culture studies of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plant cell tiss. Org. Cult. 2004;78:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Block G.B., Patterson B., Subar A. Fruit, vegetables and cancer prevention, a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr. Cancer. 1992;18:1–29. doi: 10.1080/01635589209514201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brichkova, G.G., Maneshina T.V., Kartel, N.A., 2002. Optimization of the nutrient medium for effective regeneration of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in vitro.Vestsi Natsyyanal'nai-Akademii Navuk-Belarusi.-Seryya-Biyalagichnykh Navuk, 2, pp. 47–52.
  6. Compton M.E., Veillux R.E. Shoot root and flower morphogenesis on tomato inflorescence explants. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 1991;24:223–231. [Google Scholar]
  7. Devi R., Dhailwal M.S., Kaur A., Gosal S.S. Effects of growth regulators on in vitro micropropegenic response of tomato. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2008;7:526–530. [Google Scholar]
  8. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987;19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellendula R., Narra M., Kota S., Kalva B., Velivela Y., Savitikadi P., Allini V.R. An efficient and high frequency regeneration protocol in two cultivars of Capsicum annuum. L cvs. G3 and G4. Int. J. Current Biotechnol. 2016;4:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Faisal M., Alatar A.A., Hegazy A.K. An efficient in vitro clonal multiplication of Mentha arvensis and evaluation of genetic stability using molecular markers and flow cytometry. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014;60:100–106. [Google Scholar]
  11. Foolad M.R. Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2004;76:101–119. [Google Scholar]
  12. Galbraith D.W., Harkins K.R., Maddox J.M., Ayres N.M., Sharma D.P., Firoozabady E. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science. 1983;220:1049–1051. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4601.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. Nutrients requirement of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1968;50:151–158. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gantait S., Sinniah U.R. Morphology, flow cytometry and molecular assessment of ex-vitro grown micropropagated Anthurium in comparison with seed germinated plants. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011;10:13991–13998. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gerster H. The potential role of lycopene for human health. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1997;16:109–126. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1997.10718661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghimire B.K., Yu C., Chung I.M. Direct shoot organogenesis and assessment of genetic stability in regenerants of Solanum aculeatissimum Jacq. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2012;108:455–464. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hu J.B., Li J.W., Wang L.J., Liu L.J., Si S.W. Utilization of a set of high polymorphism DAMD markers for genetic analysis of a cucumber germplasm collection. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011;33:227–231. [Google Scholar]
  18. Iftikhar A., Qureshi R., Munira M., Shabbir G., Hussain M., Khan M.A. In vitro microporpgation of Solanum villosum-a potential alternative food plant. Pak. J. Bot. 2015;47(1495–1500):2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaeppler S.M., Kaeppler H.F., Rhee Y. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000;43:179–188. doi: 10.1023/a:1006423110134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lijana K.G., Mitrev S., Fidanka T., Mite L. Micropropagation of potato Solanum tuberosum L. Electronic J. Bot. 2012;8:45–49. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liza L.N., Nasar A.N.M., Zinnah K.M.A., Chowdhury M.Al-Nayem, Ashrafuzzaman M. In vitro growth media effect for regeneration of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and evaluation of the salt tolerance activity of callus. J. Agric. Sustain. 2013;3:132–143. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mallon R., Rodriguez-Oubina J., Gonzalez M.L. In vitro propagation of the endangered plant Centaurea ultreiae: assessment of genetic stability by cytological studies, flow cytometry and RAPD analysis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2010;101:31–39. [Google Scholar]
  23. Moghaleb R.E.A., Saneoka H., Fujita K. Plant regeneration from hypocotyls and cotyledon explants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1999;45:639–646. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mohamed A.N., Ismail M.R., Rahman M.H. In vitro response from cotyledon and hypocotyls explants in tomato by inducing 6-benzylaminopurine. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010;9:4802–4807. [Google Scholar]
  25. Murashige T., Skoog A. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962;15:473–497. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nitsch J.P., Nitsch Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science. 1969;163:85–87. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3862.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Obae S.G., West T.P. Nuclear DNA content of Hydrastis canadensis L. and genome size stability of in vitro regenerated plantlets. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2010;102:259–263. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pauling L. W.H. Freeman and Company; San Francisco: 1955. College Chemistry; p. 578. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rao A., Agarwal S. Role of antioxidant lycopene in cancer and heart disease. J. Am. College Nutr. 2000;19:563–569. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rathore M.S., Chikara J., Shaik G., Mastan S.G., Rahman H., Anand K.G.V. Assessment of genetic stability and instability of tissue culture propagated plantlets of Aloe vera L. by RAPD and ISSR markers. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2011;165:1356–1365. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9352-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Raziuddin S., Salim H.J., Chaudhary T., Mohammad A., Ali S. Hormonal effect on callus induction in tomato. Sarhad J. Agric. 2004;20:223–225. [Google Scholar]
  32. Robinson J.P., Saranya S. An improved method for the in vitro propagation of Solanum melongena L. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2013;2:299–306. [Google Scholar]
  33. Siddique I., Anis M. Rapid micropropagation of Ocimum basilicum using shoot tip explants pre-cultured in thidiazuron supplemented liquid medium. Biol. Plant. 2007;51:787–790. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tomsone S., Gertnere D., Novikova D. The influence of thidiazuron on Shoot regeneration and proliferation of rhododendrons in vitro. Acta Universit. Latviensis Biol. 2004;676:239–242. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vujovic T., Cerovic R., Ruzic D. Ploidy level stability of adventitious shoots of sour cherry and Gisela 5 cherry rootstock. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2012;111:323–333. [Google Scholar]
  36. White P.R. A hand book of plant tissue culture. Phyton. 1943;7:103–119. [Google Scholar]
  37. Williams K., Kubelik A.R., Rafalski J.A., Tingey S.V. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 1990;18:1631–1635. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.22.6531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES