Abstract
WBSCR16 (Williams‐Beuren Syndrome Chromosomal Region 16) gene is located in a large deletion region of Williams‐Beuren syndrome (WBS), which is a neurodevelopmental disorder. Although the relationship between WBSCR16 and WBS remains unclear, it has been reported that WBSCR16 is a member of a functional module that regulates mitochondrial 16S rRNA abundance and intra‐mitochondrial translation. WBSCR16 has RCC1 (Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 1)‐like amino acid sequence repeats but the function of WBSCR16 appears to be different from that of other RCC1 superfamily members. Here, we demonstrate that WBSCR16 localizes to mitochondria in HeLa cells, and report the crystal structure of WBSCR16 determined to 2.0 Å resolution using multi‐wavelength anomalous diffraction. WBSCR16 adopts the seven‐bladed β‐propeller fold characteristic of RCC1‐like proteins. A comparison of the WBSCR16 structure with that of RCC1 and other RCC1‐like proteins reveals that, although many of the residues buried in the core of the β‐propeller are highly conserved, the surface residues are poorly conserved and conformationally divergent.
Keywords: WBSCR16, RCC1‐like protein, Williams‐Beuren syndrome, mitochondrial translation, mitoribosome
Short abstract
PDB Code(s): 5XGS
Introduction
Mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes) are specialized for the synthesis and insertion of membrane proteins that are essential for the oxidative phosphorylation system.1 Although recent high‐resolution cryo‐electron microscopy has provided rich insights into the structure and function of mitoribosomes,2 the current understanding of the mitoribosome biogenesis pathway and the factors involved in regulation of the intra‐mitochondrial translation machinery still remains far from complete.3
Interestingly, a recent study using a CRISPR‐based screen (as a new approach to systematically identify human genes essential for oxidative phosphorylation) identified a previously unrecognized protein‐RNA functional module consisting of NGRN, WBSCR16, RPUSD4, TRUB2, and FASTKD2 required for mitochondrial 16S rRNA abundance and intra‐mitochondrial translation.4 WBSCR16 (Williams‐Beuren syndrome chromosomal region 16), one of the components of the newly identified functional module, is encoded in the deletion region of Williams‐Beuren syndrome (WBS).5 WBS is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by cardiovascular malformations, mental retardation, and a specific facial dysmorphism. WBS is caused by a heterozygous deletion of many genes on chromosome 7q11.23. Although WBSCR16 gene is not located in the critical region for WBS, a large deletion including the entire WBSCR16 gene demonstrates a severe phenotype of WBS.6 There are no known point mutation(s) or partial deletion(s) of the WBSCR16 gene associated with WBS.
WBSCR16 has RCC1 (Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 1)‐like amino acid sequence repeats.7 RCC1 is the only known guanine‐nucleotide exchange factor for the Ran GTPase,8 and is localized to chromosomes throughout the cell cycle.9, 10 Chromosome‐anchored RCC1 generates Ran‐GTP in the vicinity of chromosomes and thus provides a spatial signal that controls nucleo‐cytoplasmic transport, nuclear envelope formation, and mitotic spindle assembly.11 Here we describe the X‐ray crystal structure of human WBSCR16 to be used as a starting point to understand its structure‐function relationship.
Results and Discussion
Structure determination
Previous immunoprecipitation study by Arroyo et al. detected co‐precipitation of WBSCR16 with mitochondrial proteins and mitochondrial 16S rRNA,4 indicating that WBSCR16 is a mitochondrial protein. We analyzed subcellular localization of C‐terminally FLAG‐tagged WBSCR16 expressed in HeLa cells by immunostaining using anti‐FLAG antibody. As expected, WBSCR16 localized specifically to mitochondria [Fig. 1(A)]. Consistently, the TargetP web server12 predicted the N‐terminal 31 amino acids of WBSCR16 as a mitochondrial targeting peptide (mTP) [Fig. 1(B)]. Because the N‐terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence would be cleaved off upon import into mitochondria, we initially attempted to crystallize WBSCR16 residues 32–464 (a construct devoid of the N‐terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence). Although we obtained crystals of this construct, the crystals diffracted X‐rays only to 7.0 Å resolution. To obtain crystals suitable for structure determination, we employed a strategy to optimize the construct by shortening one of the predicted surface loops. We made a deletion mutant by replacing residues 146–153 (in one of the predicted surface loops of WBSCR16)7 with two glycine residues. This mutant formed well‐ordered crystals that diffracted X‐rays to 2.0 Å resolution. The crystals belonged to the space group I2, with unit‐cell parameters a = 111.0 Å, b = 54.6 Å, c = 140.5 Å, and β = 95.8°. The structure was determined using SeMet MAD (multi‐wavelength anomalous diffraction) phasing method, and the final model was refined to free and working R‐factor values of 21.8% and 18.0%, respectively (Table 1). There were two molecules of WBSCR16 per asymmetric unit, with a solvent content of 46.5%. The refined model consists of residues 59–462 for one molecule of WBSCR16, residues 57–82, 84–145, and 155–464 for another molecule of WBSCR16, and 598 water molecules. The two WBSCR16 molecules in the asymmetric unit were essentially identical [a root mean square deviation (r.m.s.d.) of Cα atoms of 0.73 Å], indicating that crystal packing interactions had not significantly altered their conformation. A representative portion of the final 2F O–F C map is shown in Supporting Information Figure S1. The final model had excellent stereochemistry (Table 1). Although Y291 was a Ramachandran outlier, the electron density unambiguously showed the location of its carbonyl oxygen (Supporting Information Fig. S1).
Figure 1.
Subcellular localization and crystal structure of human WBSCR16. (A) Localization of WBSCR16 to mitochondria in HeLa‐Su9 cells. WBSCR16‐FLAG was transiently expressed in HeLa‐Su9 cells expressing mitochondria‐targeted DsRed (DsRed‐Mito). Cells were fixed and stained with anti‐FLAG antibody (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Schematic representation of full‐length WBSCR16. mTP, mitochondrial targeting peptide. (C), (D) Stereoview of a ribbon drawing of the crystal structure of human WBSCR16 (PDB code, 5XGS) in (C) top view and (D) a side view. The seven blades are numbered B1‐B7 along the amino acid sequence. The Cα of D59, the N‐terminus of the RCC1‐like domain of WBSCR16, is shown as a black sphere. (E) Superposition of the seven blades. Each blade is colored as in (C) and (D). (F) Structure‐based sequence alignment of the seven blades. Highly conserved regions are boxed. The names of basic residues in C‐D loops of the blades B1 and B2 are written in blue. The names of residues in β‐strands are written in red. The positions of β‐strands are indicated by red arrows. Sequence logo, generated by the program WebLogo (http://weblogo.berkeley.edu/), is shown below the sequence alignment. The x‐axis of the sequence logo shows the amino acid position and the y‐axis represents the information content measured in bits. The overall height of each stack of letters indicates the sequence conservation at that position, and the height of a letter within the stack indicates the relative frequency of the amino acid.
Table 1.
Crystallographic Statistics
Crystal | Native | SeMet | |
---|---|---|---|
Data collection | |||
Space group | I2 | I2 | |
Unit cell dimensions a, b, c (Å) α, β, γ (degree) |
111.0, 54.6, 140.5 90, 95.8, 90 |
111.4, 54.2, 140.6 90, 95.9, 90 |
|
X‐ray source | SPring‐8 BL26B2 | Photon Factory BL‐1A | |
Peak | Inflection | ||
Wavelength (Å) | 1.00000 | 0.97850 | 0.97900 |
Resolution range (Å)a | 34.9–2.0 (2.05–2.00) | 26.0–2.4 (2.49–2.40) | 27.2–2.4 (2.49–2.40) |
Total observationsa | 214273 | 208700 | 208754 |
Unique reflectionsa | 56417 | 32982 | 33033 |
Completeness (%)a | 99.1 (98.3) | 99.3 (97.7) | 99.4 (98.7) |
R merge a | 0.17 (0.84) | 0.09 (0.27) | 0.07 (0.18) |
Mean I/σ(I)a | 6.5 (1.8) | 15.4 (6.9) | 18.1 (9.0) |
Mean I half‐set correlation CC(1/2)a | 0.987 (0.531) | 0.996 (0.963) | 0.997 (0.982) |
Multiplicitya | 3.8 (3.8) | 3.8 (3.1) | 3.8 (3.1) |
Refinement | |||
Resolution range (Å)a | 34.9–2.0 | ||
No. of reflections | 56397 | ||
R work (%)a | 18.0 (27.7) | ||
R free (%)a | 21.8 (31.6) | ||
No. of atoms | |||
Protein | 6016 | ||
Water | 598 | ||
No. of amino acids | 796 | ||
Mean B‐factor (Å2) | |||
Protein | 19.6 | ||
Water | 24.3 | ||
RMSD from ideality | |||
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.002 | ||
Bond angles (degree) | 0.531 | ||
Protein geometryb | |||
Rotamer outliers (%) | 0 | ||
Ramachandran favored (%) | 98.73 | ||
Ramachandran outliers (%) | 0.25 | ||
Cβ deviations > 0.25 Å (%) | 0 | ||
MolProbity score (percentile) | 1.01 (100) | ||
PDB code | 5XGS |
Values in parentheses are for the highest‐resolution shell.
MolProbity was used to analyze the structures.
Overall structure of human WBSCR16
In the crystal structure, WBSCR16 adopts a seven‐bladed β‐propeller structure, as expected from the RCC1‐like sequence repeats. Figure 1(C) shows the top view of the overall structure of WBSCR16, whereas Figure 1(D) shows its right‐side view. In the top view [Fig. 1(C)], the N‐terminus of the RCC1‐like domain (D59) is located at the bottom surface. Each blade is composed of four antiparallel β‐strands with loops between each strand. The innermost strands (strands A) of each blade run roughly parallel to the central axis of the propeller. The outer strands (strands B, C, and D) tilt as they radiate away from the center of the propeller. The inner strands (strands A, B, and C) are roughly seven residues long, whereas the outermost strands (strands D) are subdivided into two much shorter strands (strands D1 and D2). Similar to RCC1,13 ring closure in WBSCR16 is accomplished by 2 + 2 arrangement of the β‐strands of the first blade (B1): the blade B1 is composed of the strands C and D from the N‐terminus of the β‐propeller domain, and the strands A and B from the C‐terminus of WBSCR16. The propeller has pseudo seven‐fold symmetry, as is evident in the overlay of the structures of the seven blades [Fig. 1(E)] and also in the similarity of the amino acid sequences of the seven blades [Fig. 1(F)].
Comparison of the human WBSCR16 structure with that of other proteins
A similarity search using the DALI web server14 revealed that the structure of WBSCR16 is more closely related to that of RCC1 and RCC1‐like proteins than to any other β‐propeller structures such as that of WD40‐repeat15 proteins or FG‐GAP (phenylalanyl‐glycyl‐glycyl‐alanyl‐prolyl)‐repeat16 proteins (Supporting Information Table S1). We used the ENDscript web server17 to analyze both sequences and crystal structures of RCC1 and RCC1‐like proteins (with the same 2 + 2 arrangement of β‐strands in the first blade) in detail. Figure 2(A) shows the comparison of human WBSCR16 with human RCC1 (PDB code, 1I2M),18 Prp20p (yeast RCC1; PDB code, 3OF7),19 human RPGR (PDB code, 4JHP),20 and the third RCC1‐like domain of human HERC1 (PDB code, 4O2W; unpublished). As shown in Figure 2(A), many of the residues invariant or highly conserved among the WBSCR16 repeats [boxed residues in Fig. 1(F)], are also highly conserved in RCC1 and other RCC1‐like proteins. Almost all of these highly conserved residues are buried in the core of the β‐propeller [Fig. 2(A,B)], and so are probably important for structural integrity of the β‐propeller. On the other hand, almost all of the residues exposed on the surface of the β‐propeller, especially in the C‐D loops and D‐A loops, are poorly conserved and conformationally divergent [Fig. 2(A,B)], suggesting that many of the surface residues of WBSCR16 are potentially involved in WBSCR16‐specific function.
Figure 2.
Comparison of human WBSCR16 with RCC1 and other RCC1‐like proteins. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of human WBSCR16, human RCC1, yeast Prp20p, human RPGR, and the third RCC1‐like domain of human HERC1. Similarity scores were calculated using the ENDscript web server, according to a matrix based on physicochemical properties. Residue names are written in black if score is below 0.7 (low similarity); they are in red on a yellow background if score is in the range 0.7–1 (high similarity); they are in white on a red background in case of strict identity. The positions of β‐strands of WBSCR16 are indicated by arrows above the sequence. Solvent accessibility of WBSCR16 residues is rendered by a bar below the sequence (blue is accessible, cyan is intermediate, white is buried) (B) Stereoview of a sausage drawing of WBSCR16. For this drawing, the structures of human RCC1 (PDB code, 1I2M, chain B), yeast Prp20p (PDB code, 3OF7, chain A), human RPGR (PDB code, 4JHP, chain C), and the third RCC1‐like domain of human HERC1 (PDB code, 4O2W, chain A) were superposed onto the structure of human WBSCR16, and the radius of the sausage is proportional to the mean r.m.s.d. per residue between Cα pairs. To visualize sequence conservation, the sausage is color ramped from white [similarity score calculated in (A) below 0.7] to red (strict identity).
Comparison of human WBSCR16 with its homologs
To try to identify the surface residues that are potentially important for specific interactions of the RCC1‐like domain of WBSCR16 homologs, we analyzed the sequence conservation of WBSCR16 using the ConSurf web server.21 For this analysis, we built a model of the loop (deleted for crystallization) in the blade B2 using the program Modeller22 [as marked by a dashed circle in Supporting Information Fig. S2(A)], and the surface conservation profile of WBSCR16 (together with surface electrostatic potential of human WBSCR16) is shown in Supporting Information Figure S2(B,C). There are a number of highly conserved residues on the surface of WBSCR16 that might be involved in interactions with its binding partners. Notably, there is a patch of highly conserved residues on the top surface of the β‐propeller that has predominantly negative potential. The bottom surface of the β‐propeller, on the other hand, has predominantly positive electrostatic potential. Also noteworthy are the basic loops of the blades B1 and B2 [as marked by dashed circles in Supporting Information Fig. S2(B)] protruding from the β‐propeller. Because WBSCR16 is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial 16S rRNA abundance and intra‐mitochondrial translation,4 the basic residues exposed on the surface are intriguing as potential binding sites for nucleic acids such as rRNA. However, the sequence conservation of the surface basic patches of WBSCR16 is not quite high. The functional significance of the exposed residues is unclear at present. Identification of binding partners of WBSCR16 and extensive functional analyses will be required to elucidate the structure‐function relationship of WBSCR16.
In summary, we have used X‐ray crystallography and established the structure of human WBSCR16, which demonstrates that WBSCR16 has seven‐bladed β‐propeller fold (the RCC1 fold) with unique surface features. Although the function of WBSCR16 is only beginning to be understood, the availability of this structure will likely have significance for understanding the poorly characterized molecular mechanism underlying intra‐mitochondrial translation, which is paramount to mitochondrial respiration and thus to cell viability, growth, and differentiation.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
The HeLa cell line expressing mitochondria‐targeted DsRed (HeLa‐Su9)23 was cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (D‐MEM; Wako, Osaka, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 μg/ml puromycin.
Analysis of WBSCR16 localization
To analyze the localization of WBSCR16, a human WBSCR16 fragment was amplified by PCR from human cDNA using the primers 5′‐AAGCTTCACCATGGCGCTGGTGGTGGCGTTGGTG‐3′ and 5′‐GGTACCGTGATGAATGACTTGGCCAGGGTCACC‐3′, and cloned into p3xFLAG‐CMV‐14 expression vector (SIGMA). For immunostaining, HeLa‐Su9 cells were plated onto an eight‐well cover glass chamber (AGC Techno Glass Co., LTD., 2 × 104 cells per well) and cultured in D‐MEM containing 10% FBS. After 1 day, the cells were transfected with the expression plasmid for WBSCR16‐FLAG (200 ng per well) using jetPRIME (Polyplus‐transfection), in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. Two days after transfection, fixation of the cells was performed using 8% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS (137 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, pH 7) at 37°C for 3 min. Then, the cells were permeabilized with 0.5% (vol/vol) Triton X‐100 in PBS at room temperature for 10 min. After fixation and permeabilization, cells were incubated with rabbit antibodies against FLAG (F7425; Sigma) in PBS with 1% (wt/vol) skimmed milk powder. The primary antibody was detected with goat Alexa 488‐conjugated anti‐rabbit (A‐11008, Thermo Fisher Scientific). After immunostaining, cells were incubated with 10 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 in PBS at room temperature for 10 min. The fluorescent images of immunostained cells were acquired using a spinning disk confocal system (CellVoyager CV1000; Yokogawa Electric). To create maximum‐intensity projection images and adjust the brightness and contrast, we used CV1000 software (Yokogawa Electric) and Fiji (http://fiji.sc/).
Protein expression and purification
To construct a plasmid for expressing human WBSCR16 (UniProt code, Q96I51) with N‐terminal GST tag in E. coli cells, the cDNA encoding WBSCR16 (residues 32–464, in which residues 146–153 were replaced with two glycine residues) was subcloned into pGEX‐TEV24 bacterial expression vector. The construct was verified by DNA sequencing. GST‐WBSCR16 was expressed in E. coli strain BL21‐CodonPlus(DE3)RIL (Stratagene) at 18°C in 2× TY medium. After harvesting, the pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −20°C until needed.
For purification, the frozen pellet of the cells expressing GST‐WBSCR16 was thawed at room temperature and resuspended in buffer A [30 mM Tris‐HCl (pH7.5), 0.5 M NaCl, 7 mM 2‐mercaptoethanol, 1 mM PMSF] and lysed by sonication on ice. All subsequent purification steps were performed at 4°C. Tween20 was added to the clarified lysate to a final concentration of 0.05%. After incubating the clarified lysate with Glutathione‐sepharose 4B resin (GE Healthcare) for 3 h, the resin was washed with buffer B [30 mM Tris‐HCl (pH7.5), 0.3 M NaCl, 2 mM 2‐mercaptoethanol, 0.05% Tween20]. The GST‐tag was removed with His‐TEV protease (0.07 mg/ml) overnight in buffer B containing 0.2 mM AEBSF. WBSCR16 released from the resin was finally purified by gel filtration over Superdex200 (GE Healthcare) in buffer C [10 mM Tris‐HCl (pH7.5), 0.25 M NaCl, 2 mM 2‐mercaptoethanol]. Fractions containing >95% pure WBSCR16, as assessed by SDS‐PAGE, were pooled and concentrated using a Millipore concentrator (Mol. wt. cutoff 10,000).
The selenomethionine (SeMet)‐substituted human WBSCR16 (residues 32–464, in which residues 146–153 were replaced with two glycine residues) was expressed in the same strain, BL21‐CodonPlus (DE3)RIL (Stratagene), which is not auxotrophic for methionine. Methionine biosynthesis was inhibited by growth conditions as described.25 A preculture, grown in 2× TY medium at 37°C was inoculated into minimal medium containing 1× M9 supplemented with 20 μg/ml thiamine, 20 μg/ml biotin and 50 μg/ml ampicillin and grown overnight at 28°C to an OD600 of 0.7. A mixture of L‐amino acids was added as solids (per liter of culture: 50 mg of SeMet (Wako), 50 mg of leucine, isoleucine, valine, and 100 mg of lysine, threonine, phenylalanine). After 15 min, protein expression was induced by the addition of 0.8 mM IPTG and the culture was grown overnight at 18°C. SeMet‐substituted WBSCR16 was purified as described for the non‐substituted WBSCR16.
Crystallization, data collection, and structure determination
Crystals of WBSCR16 were obtained using hanging drop vapor diffusion method at 20°C. Both native and SeMet‐substituted WBSCR16 crystals were grown by mixing equal volumes (1.5 μl each) of the protein solution (10 mg/ml WBSCR16 in buffer C) with the precipitant solution consisting of 0.1 M HEPES‐NaOH (pH 7.0), 15% PEG20000. Rod‐shaped crystals grew to a maximum dimension of 0.02 × 0.02 × 1.0 mm in one month. Crystals were serially transferred to 0.1 M HEPES‐NaOH (pH 7.0), 15% PEG20000, 20% glycerol in four steps and flash‐cooled in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction datasets for the native WBSCR16 crystals were collected at SPring‐8 beamline BL26B2 at 100 K. Two‐wavelength MAD diffraction datasets at the Se absorption edge for the SeMet‐substituted WBSCR16 crystals were collected at Photon Factory beamline BL‐1A at 100 K. The SeMet‐substituted crystals were isomorphous with the native crystals.
Diffraction data were indexed and integrated using MOSFLM and further processed using CCP4 programs.26 The structure was determined by SeMet MAD phasing using CRANK.27 Twelve Se sites (of twelve SeMet residues in the two molecules of human WBSCR16 in the asymmetric unit) were located by program AFRO/CRUNCH2 and refined using BP3.27 Following density modification using SOLOMON,28 a large fraction of WBSCR16 was automatically built using BUCCANEER.29 Iterative cycles of manual rebuilding using COOT30 and refinement using PHENIX31 against the native dataset to 2.0 Å resolution yielded a final model with R work = 18.0% (R free = 21.8%). The final model geometry was validated by MolProbity.32 Data collection and refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1. Structural figures were produced using CCP4MG33 and PyMOL (DeLano Scientific).
ConSurf analysis of evolutionary conservation
The evolutionary conservation profile of WBSCR16 was estimated using ConSurf.21 A CSI‐BLAST search for homologs of the human WBSCR16 sequence was performed against the UNIREF90 database with an E‐value cutoff of 0.00001, minimal % ID of 35% for homologs and maximal % ID of 95% between sequences. A total of 150 homologous sequences were retrieved and multiply aligned using MAFFT. Calculation of position‐specific conservation scores was performed using the Bayesian method.
Accession number
The coordinates and structure factors of human WBSCR16 have been deposited in the PDB with accession code 5XGS.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Hidemi Hirano for technical assistance and discussion. We also thank the staff of SPring‐8 and Photon Factory for assistance during data collection and Prof. N. Ishihara in Kurume University for providing the HeLa‐Su9 cell line. This work was supported by a Grant‐in‐Aid for Exploratory Research (15k14559 to NS).
References
- 1. Ott M, Amunts A, Brown A (2016) Organization and regulation of mitochondrial protein synthesis. Annu Rev Biochem 85:77–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Greber BJ, Ban N (2016) Structure and function of the mitochondrial ribosome. Annu Rev Biochem 85:103–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. De Silva D, Tu YT, Amunts A, Fontanesi F, Barrientos A (2015) Mitochondrial ribosome assembly in health and disease. Cell Cycle 14:2226–2250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arroyo JD, Jourdain AA, Calvo SE, Ballarano CA, Doench JG, Root DE, Mootha VK (2016) A genome‐wide CRISPR death screen identifies genes essential for oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab 24:875–885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Merla G, Ucla C, Guipponi M, Reymond A (2002) Identification of additional transcripts in the Williams‐Beuren syndrome critical region. Human Genet 110:429–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Schubert C, Laccone F (2006) Williams‐Beuren syndrome: Determination of deletion size using quantitative real‐time PCR. Int J Mol Med 18:799–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hadjebi O, Casas‐Terradellas E, Garcia‐Gonzalo FR, Rosa JL (2008) The RCC1 superfamily: From genes, to function, to disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:1467–1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bischoff FR, Ponstingl H (1991) Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the mitotic regulator RCC1. Nature 354:80–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ohtsubo M, Okazaki H, Nishimoto T (1989) The RCC1 protein, a regulator for the onset of chromosome condensation locates in the nucleus and binds to DNA. J Cell Biol 109:1389–1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Moore W, Zhang C, Clarke PR (2002) Targeting of RCC1 to chromosomes is required for proper mitotic spindle assembly in human cells. Curr Biol 12:1442–1447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dasso M (2002) The Ran GTPase: Theme and variations. Curr Biol 12:R502–R508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2007) Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc 2:953–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Renault L, Nassar N, Vetter I, Becker J, Klebe C, Roth M, Wittinghofer A (1998) The 1.7 A crystal structure of the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1) reveals a seven‐bladed propeller. Nature 392:97–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Holm L, Rosenstrom P (2010) Dali server: Conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res 38:W545–W549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Xu C, Min J (2011) Structure and function of WD40 domain proteins. Protein Cell 2:202–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Springer TA (1997) Folding of the N‐terminal, ligand‐binding region of integrin alpha‐subunits into a beta‐propeller domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:65–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Robert X, Gouet P (2014) Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W320–W324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Renault L, Kuhlmann J, Henkel A, Wittinghofer A (2001) Structural basis for guanine nucleotide exchange on Ran by the regulator of chromosome condensation (RCC1). Cell 105:245–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Wu F, Liu Y, Zhu Z, Huang H, Ding B, Wu J, Shi Y (2011) The 1.9A crystal structure of Prp20p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its binding properties to Gsp1p and histones. J Struct Biol 174:213–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Watzlich D, Vetter I, Gotthardt K, Miertzschke M, Chen YX, Wittinghofer A, Ismail S (2013) The interplay between RPGR, PDEdelta and Arl2/3 regulate the ciliary targeting of farnesylated cargo. EMBO Rep 14:465–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben‐Tal N (2010) ConSurf 2010: Calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 38:W529–W533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234:779–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Taguchi N, Ishihara N, Jofuku A, Oka T, Mihara K (2007) Mitotic phosphorylation of dynamin‐related GTPase Drp1 participates in mitochondrial fission. J Biol Chem 282:11521–11529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Matsuura Y, Stewart M (2004) Structural basis for the assembly of a nuclear export complex. Nature 432:872–877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Van Duyne GD, Standaert RF, Karplus PA, Schreiber SL, Clardy J (1993) Atomic structures of the human immunophilin FKBP‐12 complexes with FK506 and rapamycin. J Mol Biol 229:105–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, Keegan RM, Krissinel EB, Leslie AG, McCoy A, McNicholas SJ, Murshudov GN, Pannu NS, Potterton EA, Powell HR, Read RJ, Vagin A, Wilson KS (2011) Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Cryst D67:235–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pannu NS, Waterreus WJ, Skubak P, Sikharulidze I, Abrahams JP, de Graaff RA (2011) Recent advances in the CRANK software suite for experimental phasing. Acta Cryst D67:331–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Abrahams JP, Leslie AG (1996) Methods used in the structure determination of bovine mitochondrial F1 ATPase. Acta Cryst D52:30–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cowtan K (2006) The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Cryst D62:1002–1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Emsley P, Cowtan K (2004) Coot: Model‐building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Cryst D60:2126–2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse‐Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH (2010) PHENIX: A comprehensive Python‐based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Cryst D66:213–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chen VB, Arendall WB, 3rd , Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2010) MolProbity: All‐atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Cryst D66:12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. McNicholas S, Potterton E, Wilson KS, Noble ME (2011) Presenting your structures: The CCP4mg molecular‐graphics software. Acta Cryst D67:386–394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information