Skip to main content
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses logoLink to AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
. 2017 Aug 1;33(8):859–868. doi: 10.1089/aid.2016.0294

HIV-1 Consensus Envelope-Induced Broadly Binding Antibodies

R Ryan Meyerhoff 1,,2,, Richard M Scearce 1, Damon F Ogburn 1, Brad Lockwood 1, Joy Pickeral 1,,3, Masa Kuraoka 2, Kara Anasti 1, Joshua Eudailey 1, Amanda Eaton 1, Melissa Cooper 1, Kevin Wiehe 1, David C Montefiori 1,,3, Georgia Tomaras 1,,3, Guido Ferrari 1,,3, S Munir Alam 1, Hua-Xin Liao 1,,4, Bette Korber 5, Feng Gao 1, Barton F Haynes 1,,2,,6,
PMCID: PMC5564029  PMID: 28314374

Abstract

Antibodies that cross-react with multiple HIV-1 envelopes (Envs) are useful reagents for characterizing Env proteins and for soluble Env capture and purification assays. We previously reported 10 murine monoclonal antibodies induced by group M consensus Env, CON-6 immunization. Each demonstrated broad cross-reactivity to recombinant Envs. Here we characterized the Env epitopes to which they bind. Seven mapped to linear epitopes in gp120, five at the Env N-terminus, and two at the Env C-terminus. One antibody, 13D7, bound at the gp120 N-terminus (aa 30–42), reacted with HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells, and when expressed in a human IgG1 backbone, mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Antibody 18F11 bound at the gp120 C-terminus (aa 445–459) and reactivity was glycan dependent. Antibodies 13D7, 3B3, and 16H3 bound to 100 percent of HIV-1 Envs tested in ELISA and sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis/western blot analysis. These data define the epitopes of monoclonal antibody reagents for characterization of recombinant Envs, one epitope of which is also expressed on the surface of HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells.

Keywords: : antibody-mediated immunity, HIV, monoclonal, vaccine design, ADCC

Introduction

Recombinant HIV-1 envelopes (Envs) are currently used for serologic assays in HIV-1 infection and vaccination, and for immunizations with experimental HIV-1 vaccines.1–8 A number of antibodies have been found that bind to Env glycans on the surface of virus-infected cells and virions and neutralize HIV-1.9–22 Antibodies that can decorate the surface of the native Env on infectious virions have the potential to neutralize HIV-1.23 Env antibodies may either bind to virions and be neutralizing,24 or in the case of virus-infected cells, bind to infected cells and may have the capacity to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC).25–27

In this study, we have characterized murine antibodies induced by a group M consensus envelope gp140, CON-6,28 three of which bind to all of 100% of recombinant Envs tested in sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and ELISA, and are important QC reagents for producing recombinant Envs. One mAb, 13D7, was found to be non-neutralizing, yet bound to the surface of tier 2 (difficult to neutralize) virus-infected cells and mediated ADCC.

Materials and Methods

Recombinant proteins

HIV-1 Envelopes were expressed in 293T cells and lectin column purified, with a subsequent purification step for monomeric Envs by size-exclusion chromatography SEC on a Superdex 200 FPLC (GE Healthcare) and purified to homogeneity for monomeric gp120. Envelopes denoted by Δ11 contained an 11 aa N-terminal deletion. Natively deglycosylated JR-FL gp140 Envelope was produced using PNGaseF as previously described.29

Immunization of mice and generation of hybridoma cell lines

BALB/c mice were immunized with 25 μg of purified HIV-1 env proteins (CON6 gp140CFI or C.97ZA012 gp140CFI) in Emulsigen (MVP Laboratories, Omaha, NE) and oCpGs (Midland Certified Reagent Company, Inc., Midland, TX) as previously described.28 Splenocytes were harvested 3 days following the fourth immunization, and hybridoma fusions were performed using HAT (hypoxanthine, aminopterin, thymidine)-sensitive mouse myeloma cells, P3X63 Ag8 or NS-1, as previously described.30 Hybridomas secreting HIV-1 Env-specific antibodies after 14 days of culture were identified by ELISA with autologous Env proteins. Positive cell lines were expanded in large-scale culture. Monoclonal antibodies were then purified from cell culture supernatants for further analysis.

Epitope mapping

Epitope mapping was detected via ELISA, utilizing a peptide array of 15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 amino acids derived from HIV-1 gp140 Con6 Env. Antibodies were diluted to 10 μg/ml. Binding was detected by goat anti-mouse conjugated to alkaline phosphatase and substrate. Binding was considered positive when the optical density (OD) at 405 nm was threefold over background.

Competition assays

Competition and cross-competition of purified mAb binding to HIV-1 Env were carried out via ELISA. For cross-competition assays, purified 13D5, 16H3, and 3B3 were titrated against plate-bound HIV-1 ConS gp140 and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour and washed, before addition of limiting dilutions of biotinylated 13D5, 16H3, and 3B3. Binding was detected by streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase and substrate, and OD was measured at 450 nm. Percent inhibition was measured as reduction in OD compared to uninhibited antibody after subtracting background. To measure inhibition of A32 binding, mouse mAbs were titrated against the target HIV-1 Env before addition of biotinylated mAb A32 at a limiting concentration. Binding of biotinylated A32 was detected with streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and substrate. Percent inhibition was calculated as described above.

Polyreactivity of mouse monoclonal antibodies

Indirect immunofluorescence binding of mouse mAbs to HEp-2 cells (Inverness Medical Professional Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ) was performed as described previously.31 Images were taken on an Olympus AX70 with SpotFLex FX1520 charge-coupled device with a UPlanFL 40 × (numerical aperture, 0.75) objective at 25°C in the FITC channel using SPOT software. All images were acquired for the time according to the figure legend. Image layout and scaling were performed in Adobe Photoshop without image manipulation.

Prediction of N-linked glycosylation sites

To predict N-linked glycosylation sites, HIV-1 Env amino acid sequences were submitted to the N-GlycoSite server at the Los Alamos National Laboratory HIV Database.

SDS-PAGE and western blot

A panel of 66 unique HIV-1 gp120 or gp140 Env recombinant proteins from six clades (A, B, C, AE, BC, M) were used to determine cross-reactivity of mAbs. Env proteins (500 ng) were separated on a reducing 4%–12% gradient Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and blotted on to a nitrocellulose membrane using the iBlot dry blot system (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Membranes were blocked overnight in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% casein at 4°C. Following blocking, membranes were washed, probed with 1 μg/ml of mAb, and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 2 h. Membranes were again washed and then probed with goat-anti mouse IgG-AP antibody (5 μg/ml) in blocking buffer. Membranes were washed thrice with PBS containing Tween-20 (0.05%), and binding of mAbs detected using Novex AP Chromogenic Substrate (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Images were acquired on an Odyssey Infrared Imager.

Cell surface staining of HIV-infected CD4 T cells

Binding to HIV-1 subtype B IMC SF162 (accession number EU123924)-infected primary CD4+ target cells was determined by indirect surface immunofluorescence analysis as described.26

Construction of humanized 13D7

V(D)J sequences for Con6 13D7 CL3-1 hybridoma were obtained as described32 with modifications. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from the hybridoma using TRIzol reagents (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized from DNase I-treated RNA using Superscript III with oligo (dT)20 primers. One-twentieth (volume) of the cDNA was then subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Herculase II Fusion DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies) with established primers.33,34 PCR: 95°C for 4 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s, and then 72°C for 10 min. V(D)J amplicands were gel purified, ligated into vectors, and transformed into bacteria. DNA sequences were obtained at the Duke DNA sequencing facility. The rearranged V, D, and J gene segments were identified using IMGT/V-QUEST (www.imgt.org/). We confirmed that V(D)J usage of Con6 13D7 CL3-1 hybridoma (IGHV5-6 or IGHV5-6-1/IGHD1-2/IGHJ3, IGKV1-117/IGKJ1) was different from that of fusion partner, P3X63 (IGHV5-17/IGHD5-7/IGHJ4, IGKV6-20/IGKJ2).

Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity

ADCC activity was determined by a luciferase-based assay using HIV-1 IMC-infected cell targets as previously reported.27 CEM.NKRCCR5 cells were infected with IMC of HIV-1 encoding the subtype A Q23.17 (accession number AF004885), subtype AE CM235 (AF259954) and CM244 (KC822429), subtype B BaL (AY426110) and WITO (JN944948), and subtype C MW96.5 (U08455), 1086.c (FJ444395), TV-1 (HM215437), DU151 (DQ411851), DU422 (DQ411854), and CH505 (KC247577) env genes within an NL4-3 backbone that also expresses the Renilla luciferase reporter gene.35 ADCC activity was determined as the change in the relative luciferase unit (RLU) resulting from the loss of intact targets in test wells (containing effector cells, target cells, and the test serum) compared to RLU in control wells (containing only target cells and effector cells). ADCC activity was reported as percent specific killing calculated as [(RLU in control well—RLU in test well)/number of RLU of control well] × 100. The results were considered positive if ADCC activity was ≥15% specific killing. ADCC activities are reported either as the maximum percent specific killing observed for each test serum at any dilution, or as “ADCC Titers,” defined as the serum dilution that intersects the positive cutoff at ≥15% specific killing. ADCC activities are reported as the endpoint concentration, defined as the mAb concentration that intersects the positive cutoff of 15% specific killing.

HIV-1 neutralization assay in TZM-bl cells

Neutralizing antibody assays in TZM-bl cells were performed as described previously.36 Antibodies tested were started at concentrations of 50 μg/ml and diluted serially using threefold dilutions for a total of eight concentrations tested. Diluted antibodies were added to Env-pseudotyped viruses grown in 293T cells at a predetermined titer and incubated for 1 h. TZM-bl cells were added and allowed to incubate for 48 h. Firefly luciferase (Luc) activity was quantified using RLU using the Britelite Luminescence Reporter Gene Assay System as described by the supplier (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Waltham, MA). Percent neutralization was calculated as a reduction in RLU in test wells compared with control wells following subtraction of background RLU in control wells. Results are reported.

Results

Consensus HIV-1 Env gp140 induced antibodies with cross-clade binding reactivity to conserved linear epitopes

We previously isolated a panel of 10 cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies from mice immunized with oligomeric, lectin column-purified consensus HIV-1 gp140 Env produced in 293T cells.28 To identify mAb epitopes, we generated 15-mer overlapping peptides derived from the HIV-1 Con6 gp140 Env, and tested each of these mAbs for peptide binding in ELISA. Seven mAbs, 13D7, 8H3, 13D5, 3B3, 16H3, 18A7, and 18F11, bound to linear epitopes in the peptide array (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. S1, and Supplementary Table S1; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/aid). Five of which (13D7, 8H3, 13D5, 3B3, 16H3) bound to the first constant (C1) region and two (18A7, 18F11) bound to the C4 region (Supplementary Fig. S1). MAbs 13D5, 3B3, and 16H3 bound overlapping epitopes (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S1). This was confirmed with cross-competitive inhibition assays demonstrating that these antibodies block binding of each other to HIV-1 gp140 Env in a dose-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. S2). Conservation of epitopes bound by these antibodies is shown as sequence logos generated using WebLogo3 (Fig. 1a).37 In addition, epitopes bound by these mAbs were mapped on the crystal structure of the HIV-1 HXBc2 gp120 core monomer38 (Fig. 1b). MAbs 13D7, 8H3, 13D5, 3B3, and 16H3 bound to epitopes located within gp120 Env inner domain, while 18A7 and 18F11 bound to outer domain epitopes. Entropy of sequence variability observed within HIV-1 gp120 Env quasispecies was calculated and represented on the HIV HXBc2 gp120 core as a heat map (Fig. 1b). Each of these mAbs bound to regions of low viral sequence entropy (Fig. 1b). When mapped to the BG505 SOSIP gp140 trimer,39 mAbs 13D5, 3B3, and 16H3 bound to epitopes located within the prefusion trimer core and were not accessible on the trimer surface (Fig. 1b).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Characterization of cross-clade reactive murine monoclonal antibodies. (A) Monoclonal antibodies isolated from consensus Env gp140-immunized mice were tested for binding to an overlapping peptide array. Sequence logos corresponding to the epitopes bound by these mAbs were generated using WebLogo337 using sequences of the 66 Env panel used to define Env cross-reactivity in (C). (B) Location of epitopes on gp120 monomer (PDB 3JWD) and SOSIP gp140 trimer (PDB 4NCO). Viral sequence entropy mapped to the gp120 structure. Color bar denotes sequence entropy from low viral diversity (blue) to high viral diversity (red). (C) Cross-reactivity of linear epitope-binding mAbs against a panel of cross-clade HIV-1 Envs as determined by SDS-PAGE/western blot. See also Supplementary Figures S1 and S2, Supplementary Tables S1 and S2a–h. Env, envelope; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Binding breadth was assessed via ELISA and reducing SDS-PAGE/western blot against a multiclade panel of 66 recombinant HIV gp120 and 32 gp140 Envs (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Table S2B–H), demonstrating binding breadth to range from 26% to 100% of HIV-1 Envs tested (Table 1). Of note, mAbs 13D7, 3B3, and 16H3 bound 100% of Envs tested.

Table 1.

Summary of mAb Binding Breadth to HIV-1 Env by ELISA

HIV-1 gp140 Env binding
HIV-1 mAb Clade A (6 Env) Clade B (10 Env) Clade C (11 Env) CRF_01 AE (4 Env) CRF_0X BC (0 Env) Group M consensus (1 Env) Total (32 Env)
13D7a (%) 6 (100) 10 (100) 11 (100) 4 (100) NT 1 (100) 32 (100)
HIV-1 gp120 or gp140 Env binding
HIV-1 mAb Clade A (12 Env) Clade B (19 Env) Clade C (17 Env) CRF_01 AE (13 Env) CRF_0X BC (4 Env) Group M Consensus (1 Env) Total (66 Env)
8H3 (%) 11 (92) 19 (100) 17 (100) 13 (100) 4 (100) 1 (100) 65 (98)
13D5 (%) 5 (42) 19 (100) 16 (94) 13 (100) 4 (100) 1 (100) 58 (87)
3B3 (%) 12 (100) 19 (100) 17 (100) 13 (100) 4 (100) 1 (100) 66 (100)
16H3 (%) 12 (100) 19 (100) 17 (100) 13 (100) 4 (100) 1 (100) 66 (100)
18A7 (%) 1 (8) 0 (0) 4 (36) 11 (86) 0 (0) 1 (100) 14 (26)
18F11 (%) 10 (83) 16 (84) 10 (59) 11 (86) 3 (75) 1 (100) 51 (77)

Cross-reactivity of linear epitope-binding mAbs against a panel of HIV-1 Envs as determined by ELISA. The number of Envs tested versus those bound are listed, and cross-reactivity is expressed as percentage of HIV-1 Envs bound (in parentheses). See also Supplementary Table S2a–h.

a

Recombinant HIV-1 gp120 Env with N-terminal 11 amino deletion will not bind 13D7 due to deletion of epitope. Therefore these were not tested for binding to 13D7 mAb.

Binding breadth (%)
90–100
75–89
50–74
–49
<25

Env, envelope.

Consensus HIV-1 Env immunization induced a non-neutralizing glycan-dependent antibody

HIV-1 gp140 envelope is extensively glycosylated40 and is an important mechanism in masking antibody accessibility to the envelope trimer.41 However, several glycan-dependent broadly neutralizing antibodies that arose through natural infection have been described.9,12,14,20,42–46 Since recognition of Env glycans may, in part, confer cross-clade reactivity of HIV-1-specific antibodies, we sought to determine if any of these antibodies can recognize HIV-1 Env glycans.

We natively deglycosylated JRFL gp140 Env using PNGaseF as previously described.29 Antibodies were then tested for binding via ELISA. We found that native deglycosylation of JRFL enhanced mAb 8H3 binding and decreased 18F11 binding (Fig. 2a). The binding of 13D7, 13D5, 3B3, 16H3, and 18A7 mAb remained unchanged with native PNGaseF treatment (data not shown). The epitopes bound by 8H3 and 18F11 mAbs contain predicted N-linked glycosylation sites at aa 97 and 448, respectively, relative to the reference HIV-1 HXB2 sequence. 18F11 mAb was tested for binding to a panel of Clade C HIV Envs, of which 9 Envs lacked the glycan site at position 448 within the 18F11 epitope due to naturally occurring mutations. 18F11 failed to bind to these Envs (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Table 2I). To directly define glycan reactivity of 18F11, we used biolayer interferometry to test binding of this mAb to chemically synthesized high-mannose glycans Man9, Man5, and Man3, each of which is found on HIV-1 Env.47 18F11 mAb did not bind to free glycan (data not shown).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

18F11 binds HIV-1 Env in a glycan-dependent manner. Mabs 8H3 and 18F11 have a predicted N-linked glycosylation site (N*S/T; *any amino acid) at position X and Y, respectively. (A) Mabs 8H3 and 18F11 were tested for binding to JRFL gp140 before and after native enzymatic deglycosylation by PNGase. (B) Mab 18F11 was tested for binding to HIV-1 Envelopes with naturally occurring mutations that delete the predicted N-linked glycan site at NXX. Binding of mAb 18F11 depended on the presence of this N-linked glycan. See also Supplementary Table S2c,h.

Cross-reactive antibodies induced by Con6 gp120 immunization are polyreactive

It has been shown that acute and chronic HIV-1 infection induces polyreactive antibodies that also bind HIV-1 envelope.48–51 Similarly, polyreactive anti-HIV gp120 antibodies can be induced through vaccination with gp120 protein, as observed in the GSK PRO-HIV-002 HIV-1 vaccine trial that used a Clade B w61d gp120 Env w61d as an immunogen.31 To determine if any of the antibodies described in this article were polyreactive, we used an indirect immunofluorescent assay where antibodies were incubated with human epithelial (HEp-2) cells and binding was detected with an FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Supplementary Fig. S3). We observed binding to HEp-2 cells with antibodies 18A7, 8H3, 13D5, 13D7, 16H3, and 3B3 (Fig. 3). Although weakly positive, 18A7 showed a diffuse speckled pattern. 8H3 showed a cytoplasmic speckled pattern, while 13D7 brightly reacted with dividing cells. For mAbs 3B3 and 16H3, a similar staining pattern that resembles centrosomes is seen.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

A32 binding is competitively inhibited by C1 antibodies. C1-specific antibodies 8H3, 13D5, 3B3, and 16H3 block biotinylated A32 binding to A244 gp120 monomeric Env, consistent with the binding profile of A32 for C1 Env region. The C4 region antibody 18A7 minimally blocks A32 binding.

Env cross-reactive mAbs are non-neutralizing

It is known that antibodies that decorate either glycans or protein sequences on the native trimer on the HIV-1 virion are capable of neutralization. None of the seven mAbs that bound linear epitopes were capable of neutralization against either tier 1 or tier 2 HIV-1 Env pseudoviruses (Table 2-A), consistent with previous observations.28 Since binding of mAb 18F11 was sensitive to loss of the N448 glycan, we determined if treatment of virions with kifunensine could enable viruses to be sensitive to neutralization by mAb 18F11. Kifunensine is an endoplasmic reticulum mannosidase I inhibitor that, when used to treat cells producing HIV-1 virions, will promote the density of N-linked high-mannose residues of Env spikes expressed on the surface of virions.42,45,52 As controls, we used the V3-glycan broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) PGT128 that recognizes Man9 glycans and the V1V2-glycan bnAb PG9 that recognizes shorter glycans such as Man3 and Man5, and cannot accommodate longer glycans such as Man9.20,53 As expected, viruses grown in the presence of kifunensine were more sensitive to neutralization by PGT128, but less sensitive to neutralization by PG9. However, despite the increased density of high-mannose glycans on the virion surface following kifunensine treatment, 18F11 failed to neutralize kifunensine-treated HIV-1 pseudovirions (Table 2-B).

Table 2.

Cross-Reactive HIV-1 mAbs Fail to Neutralize HIV-1 Pseudovirions

A. Cross-reactive murine mAbs induced by consensus Env gp140 were tested for their ability to neutralize HIV-1 pseudoviruses in the TZM-bl assay
      Antibody Pos. controls
HIV-1 isolate Clade Tier 13D7 8H3 13D5 3B3 16H3 18A7 18F11 PG9 19b
SF162 B 1 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 0.318
TV1.21 C 1 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 <0.023 >50
CH505 w4.3 C 1 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 0.203 0.090
CH505 TF C 2 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 0.477 >50
DU123 C 2 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 0.124 >50
SVA-MLV NA NA >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
B. The glycan-dependent mAb 18F11 was tested for neutralization against pseudoviruses grown in the presence of kifunensine to increase the density of high-mannose glycans on the surface of the HIV-1 Env viral spike
HIV-1 isolate Q23.17 BG505 JR-FL MW965.26 CH505 w4.3 CH505s
(±) KIF + + + + + +
18F11 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50 >50
PGT128 (+Ctl) 0.021 <0.002 0.205 0.038 0.03 0.005 >5 0.688 >5 >5 >5 >5
PG9 (+Ctl) <0.005 0.104 0.022 1.117 >10 >10 >10 >10 0.305 >10 0.403 >10

Pseudoviruses remained resistant to neutralization by 18F11 despite kifunensine treatment.

IC50 (μg/ml)
<0.05
0.05–1
1.0–10.0
10–50
>50

HIV-1 mAbs induced by consensus Env competitively inhibit A32, an ADCC-mediating antibody

CD4-inducible epitopes within the HIV-1 gp140 Env C1 region are bound by ADCC-mediating mAbs such as A32, which also makes contacts in the C4 region. To investigate if this panel of C1 and C4 region-specific antibodies could inhibit binding of A32, we measured inhibition of biotinylated A32 mAb via ELISA. We found that the C1-specific mAbs, 13D5, 3B3, and 16H3 inhibit binding of A32 to HIV-1 Env in a dose-dependent manner, in addition to the C4-specific mAb, 18A7 (Fig. 3).

13D7 binds the surface of HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells and mediates ADCC

To mediate ADCC effector activity, antibodies must bind the surface of HIV-1-infected cells.2,25–27 Since we found that several of these mAbs inhibit binding of A32 to recombinant Env oligomers (13D5, 3B3, 16H3, and 18A7), we sought to determine if any could bind the surface of HIV-1 Clade B SF162-infected primary human CD4+ T cells. None of the A32-blocking mouse mAbs bound to the surface of HIV-1-infected cells. Rather, we found that mAb 13D7 did bind to the surface of HIV-1-infected CD4 T cells, as did the CD4 binding site bnAb, CH31, used as a positive control (Fig. 4). We produced a humanized version of 13D7 comprising a mouse variable region and human IgG1 constant and Fc region optimized to bind to FcRIIIa on NK cells. We found that humanized 13D7 mediated ADCC in a dose-dependent manner against CD4 T cells infected with 9 out of 11 HIV-1 infectious molecular clones (IMC) tested (Fig. 5).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

The 13D7 mAb epitope is expressed on the surface of HIV-infected cells. Scatter plot and histograms of non-neutralizing mouse mAb 13D7 binding to clade B SF162 HIV-infected human CD4+ T cells. A32-blocking mAbs T8, 13D5, 3B3, and 16H3 did not show observable binding (not shown). A32, a human mAb known to bind the surface of HIV-infected cells and mediate ADCC, and CH31, a broadly neutralizing CD4 binding site antibody (5), are shown for comparison. Non-neutralizing Abs 13D7 and A32 and broadly neutralizing Ab CH31 bind Env epitopes on the HIV-1-infected cell surface. ADCC, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Humanized mAb 13D7 mediates ADCC. The non-neutralizing murine mAb 13D7 was humanized and tested for ADCC using primary human CD4+ T cells infected with a panel of infectious molecular clones (IMCs) of tier 1 and tier 2 viruses. Humanized 13D7 mediated ADCC in 9 out of 11 (82%) IMCs tested (left panel) in a dose-dependent manner with endpoint titers ranging from ∼1 to 0.01 μg/ml (right panel).

Discussion

HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies can be important for understanding the structural dynamics of HIV-1 Env both in recombinant forms and when expressed on the surface of virions or infected cells. In this study, we show the characterization of a panel of highly cross-reactive murine antibodies induced with consensus HIV-1 Env immunization, and identified the epitopes bound by these antibodies. We identified monoclonal antibodies that will be useful for the characterization of recombinant gp120 monomer and gp140 oligomer Envs during good manufacturing practices (GMP) for human clinical trials (16H3 and 3B3). In addition, the epitope bound by mAb 13D7 represents a novel ADCC epitope and thus may be a worthwhile target in vaccination for the induction of ADCC-mediating antibodies. However, the reagents will not be useful for the study of stabilized recombinant native-like trimeric Envs (such as SOSIP trimers) unless they are open trimers and express non-neutralizing Env epitopes.54

In this study, we found that cross-reactive anti-HIV gp120 murine mAbs bound to conserved epitopes in the HIV-1 Env C1 region, except for 18A7 and 18F11 that bound to conserved epitopes in the C4 region. Each of the C1-reactive mAbs bound to HEp-2 cells, suggesting that the C1 region of HIV-1 gp120 contains multiple epitopes that are polyreactive with self-antigen. Moreover, we identified one mAb (18F11) whose binding was sensitive to enzymatic native deglycosylation by PNGase and naturally occurring absence of the N448 glycan on HIV-1 Envs. Thus, either 18F11 binds to N-linked glycans located within the HIV-1 Env C4 region or binding depends on the presence of the asparagine amino acid at 448.

Despite binding with high affinity to conserved epitopes, none of these mAbs was capable of neutralizing HIV-1 virions, including the C4 reactive mAb 18F11, whose binding depended on the presence of N448. Thus, these antibodies likely do not recognize epitopes expressed on the native trimer on the surface of virions nor on the surface of virus-infected CD4+ T cells. However, due to their broad cross-reactivity, this panel of antibodies can prove to be useful for the characterization of recombinant Envs during GMP production. In particular, 16H3 and 3B3 bound strongly to all of the recombinant Envs tested and have been important reagents for the characterization and quality control of GMP-produced recombinant Envs for vaccine studies (Haynes BF, unpublished).

HIV-1 neutralization may not be the only antibody-mediated mechanism to prevent HIV-1 acquisition since ADCC can also be an important mechanism for HIV-1 protection.2,25–27 In the RV144 vaccine efficacy trial, ADCC responses correlated with a reduced risk of infection, suggesting that non-neutralizing epitopes may be relevant for eliciting protective antibodies.2,25,55 In this study, we identified an antibody (13D7) that bound to the N-terminus of HIV-1 gp140 and bound to the surface of HIV-1-infected human CD4+ T cells. When expressed as a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody, 13D7 was capable of mediating ADCC against 82% of IMCs tested. In contrast to A32- or A32-like antibodies that bind to a conformational epitope in the C1 and C4 regions of Env, 13D7 bound to a linear epitope.56–58 As such, it may be possible to selectively induce 13D7-like ADCC responses using a minimal peptide immunogen. Thus, the epitope bound by 13D7 may be a feasible vaccine target for the induction of anti-HIV-1-infected ADCC responses.

In summary, we have isolated a panel of cross-reactive mouse monoclonal antibodies induced with consensus Env gp140 immunization. Although non-neutralizing, these mAbs cross-react with a diverse panel of Envs, suggesting their utility for the characterization of recombinant HIV-1 Envs. Finally, we identified mAb 13D7 that not only binds to a highly conserved epitope but also mediates ADCC, and thus represents a new vaccine target for the induction of ADCC responses.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (97.6KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Table1.pdf (55.5KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig2.pdf (99KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Table2.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig3.pdf (91.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the UM-1 AI100645 from NIH, NIAID, Division of AIDS Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology-Immunogen Discovery (CHAVI-ID) grant, the Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) training grant T32GM007171 (R.R.M.), and the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award F30-AI122982-0, NIAID (R.R.M.).

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Bradley T, Fera D, Bhiman J, et al. : Structural constraints of vaccine-induced tier-2 autologous HIV neutralizing antibodies targeting the receptor-binding site. Cell Rep 2016;14:43–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haynes BF, Gilbert PB, McElrath MJ, et al. : Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1275–1286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haynes BF, Kelsoe G, Harrison SC, Kepler TB: B-cell-lineage immunogen design in vaccine development with HIV-1 as a case study. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:423–433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hu JK, Crampton JC, Cupo A, et al. : Murine antibody responses to cleaved soluble HIV-1 envelope trimers are highly restricted in specificity. J Virol 2015;89:10383–10398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jardine J, Julien JP, Menis S, et al. : Rational HIV immunogen design to target specific germline B cell receptors. Science 2013;340:711–716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kang YK, Andjelic S, Binley JM, et al. : Structural and immunogenicity studies of a cleaved, stabilized envelope trimer derived from subtype A HIV-1. Vaccine 2009;27:5120–5132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, et al. : Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2209–2220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Williams WB, Liao HX, Moody MA, et al. : HIV-1 VACCINES. Diversion of HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity by gp41-microbiota cross-reactive antibodies. Science 2015;349:aab1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bonsignori M, Hwang KK, Chen X, et al. : Analysis of a clonal lineage of HIV-1 envelope V2/V3 conformational epitope-specific broadly neutralizing antibodies and their inferred unmutated common ancestors. J Virol 2011;85:9998–10009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bonsignori M, Wiehe K, Grimm SK, et al. : An autoreactive antibody from an SLE/HIV-1 individual broadly neutralizes HIV-1. J Clin Invest 2014;124:1835–1843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bonsignori M, Zhou T, Sheng Z, et al. : Maturation pathway from germline to broad HIV-1 neutralizer of a CD4-Mimic antibody. Cell 2016;165:449–463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Calarese DA, Scanlan CN, Zwick MB, et al. : Antibody domain exchange is an immunological solution to carbohydrate cluster recognition. Science 2003;300:2065–2071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Doria-Rose NA, Bhiman JN, Roark RS, et al. : New member of the V1V2-Directed CAP256-VRC26 lineage that shows increased breadth and exceptional potency. J Virol 2015;90:76–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Garces F, Lee JH, de Val N, et al. : Affinity maturation of a potent family of HIV antibodies is primarily focused on accommodating or avoiding glycans. Immunity 2015;43:1053–1063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liao HX, Lynch R, Zhou T, et al. : Co-evolution of a broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibody and founder virus. Nature 2013;496:469–476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pejchal R, Doores KJ, Walker LM, et al. : A potent and broad neutralizing antibody recognizes and penetrates the HIV glycan shield. Science 2011;334:1097–1103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Scharf L, Scheid JF, Lee JH, et al. : Antibody 8ANC195 reveals a site of broad vulnerability on the HIV-1 envelope spike. Cell Rep 2014;7:785–795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sok D, van Gils MJ, Pauthner M, et al. : Recombinant HIV envelope trimer selects for quaternary-dependent antibodies targeting the trimer apex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:17624–17629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Walker LM, Huber M, Doores KJ, et al. : Broad neutralization coverage of HIV by multiple highly potent antibodies. Nature 2011;477:466–470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Walker LM, Phogat SK, Chan-Hui PY, et al. : Broad and potent neutralizing antibodies from an African donor reveal a new HIV-1 vaccine target. Science 2009;326:285–289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu J, O'Dell S, Ofek G, et al. : Somatic populations of PGT135-137 HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies identified by 454 pyrosequencing and bioinformatics. Front Microbiol 2012;3:315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu Z, Qin HR, Chen W, et al. : Cross-reactive HIV-1-neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies identified from a patient with 2F5-like antibodies. J Virol 2011;85:11401–11408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang X, Lipchina I, Cocklin S, Chaiken I, Sodroski J: Antibody binding is a dominant determinant of the efficiency of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralization. J Virol 2006;80:11404–11408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu P, Williams LD, Shen X, et al. : Capacity for infectious HIV-1 virion capture differs by envelope antibody specificity. J Virol 2014;88:5165–5170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bonsignori M, Pollara J, Moody MA, et al. : Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity-mediating antibodies from an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial target multiple epitopes and preferentially use the VH1 gene family. J Virol 2012;86:11521–11532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ferrari G, Pollara J, Kozink D, et al. : An HIV-1 gp120 envelope human monoclonal antibody that recognizes a C1 conformational epitope mediates potent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity and defines a common ADCC epitope in human HIV-1 serum. J Virol 2011;85:7029–7036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pollara J, Bonsignori M, Moody MA, Pazgier M, Haynes BF, Ferrari G: Epitope specificity of human immunodeficiency virus-1 antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity [ADCC] responses. Curr HIV Res 2013;11:378–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gao F, Scearce RM, Alam SM, et al. : Cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies to multiple HIV-1 subtype and SIVcpz envelope glycoproteins. Virology 2009;394:91–98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ma BJ, Alam SM, Go EP, et al. : Envelope deglycosylation enhances antigenicity of HIV-1 gp41 epitopes for both broad neutralizing antibodies and their unmutated ancestor antibodies. PLoS Pathog 2011;7:e1002200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Palker TJ, Scearce RM, Miller SE, et al. : Monoclonal antibodies against human T cell leukemia-lymphoma virus (HTLV) p24 internal core protein. Use as diagnostic probes and cellular localization of HTLV. J Exp Med 1984;159:1117–1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moody MA, Yates NL, Amos JD, et al. : HIV-1 gp120 vaccine induces affinity maturation in both new and persistent antibody clonal lineages. J Virol 2012;86:7496–7507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kuraoka M, Schmidt AG, Nojima T, et al. : Complex antigens drive permissive clonal selection in germinal centers. Immunity 2016;44:542–552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rohatgi S, Ganju P, Sehgal D. Systematic design and testing of nested (RT-)PCR primers for specific amplification of mouse rearranged/expressed immunoglobulin variable region genes from small number of B cells. J Immunol Methods. December 31 2008;339:205–219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tiller T, Busse CE, Wardemann H. Cloning and expression of murine Ig genes from single B cells. J Immunol Methods. October 31 2009;350:183–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Edmonds TG, Ding H, Yuan X, et al. : Replication competent molecular clones of HIV-1 expressing Renilla luciferase facilitate the analysis of antibody inhibition in PBMC. Virology. December 05 2010;408:1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Montefiori DC: Evaluating neutralizing antibodies against HIV, SIV, and SHIV in luciferase reporter gene assays. Curr Protoc Immunol 2005;Chapter 12:Unit 12.11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. June 2004;14:1188–1190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pancera M, Majeed S, Ban YE, et al. : Structure of HIV-1 gp120 with gp41-interactive region reveals layered envelope architecture and basis of conformational mobility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:1166–1171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Julien JP, Cupo A, Sok D, et al. : Crystal structure of a soluble cleaved HIV-1 envelope trimer. Science 2013;342:1477–1483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Korber B, Gaschen B, Yusim K, Thakallapally R, Kesmir C, Detours V: Evolutionary and immunological implications of contemporary HIV-1 variation. Br Med Bull 2001;58:19–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wei X, Decker JM, Wang S, et al. : Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1. Nature 2003;422:307–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Doores KJ, Burton DR: Variable loop glycan dependency of the broad and potent HIV-1-neutralizing antibodies PG9 and PG16. J Virol 2010;84:10510–10521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Doria-Rose NA, Schramm CA, Gorman J, et al. : Developmental pathway for potent V1V2-directed HIV-neutralizing antibodies. Nature 2014;509:55–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Garces F, Sok D, Kong L, et al. : Structural evolution of glycan recognition by a family of potent HIV antibodies. Cell 2014;159:69–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Scanlan CN, Pantophlet R, Wormald MR, et al. : The broadly neutralizing anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody 2G12 recognizes a cluster of alpha1—>2 mannose residues on the outer face of gp120. J Virol 2002;76:7306–7321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sok D, Doores KJ, Briney B, et al. : Promiscuous glycan site recognition by antibodies to the high-mannose patch of gp120 broadens neutralization of HIV. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:236ra263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Behrens AJ, Vasiljevic S, Pritchard LK, et al. : Composition and antigenic effects of individual glycan sites of a trimeric HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein. Cell Rep 2016;14:2695–2706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liao HX, Chen X, Munshaw S, et al. : Initial antibodies binding to HIV-1 gp41 in acutely infected subjects are polyreactive and highly mutated. J Exp Med 2011;208:2237–2249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Haynes BF, Moody MA, Verkoczy L, Kelsoe G, Alam SM: Antibody polyspecificity and neutralization of HIV-1: A hypothesis. Hum Antibodies 2005;14:59–67 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Scheid JF, Mouquet H, Feldhahn N, et al. : Broad diversity of neutralizing antibodies isolated from memory B cells in HIV-infected individuals. Nature 2009;458:636–640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trama AM, Moody MA, Alam SM, et al. : HIV-1 envelope gp41 antibodies can originate from terminal ileum B cells that share cross-reactivity with commensal bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 2014;16:215–226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Scanlan CN, Ritchie GE, Baruah K, et al. : Inhibition of mammalian glycan biosynthesis produces non-self antigens for a broadly neutralising, HIV-1 specific antibody. J Mol Biol 2007;372:16–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kong L, Torrents de la Pena A, Deller MC, et al. : Complete epitopes for vaccine design derived from a crystal structure of the broadly neutralizing antibodies PGT128 and 8ANC195 in complex with an HIV-1 Env trimer. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2015;71(Pt 10):2099–2108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sanders RW, van Gils MJ, Derking R, et al. : HIV-1 VACCINES. HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies induced by native-like envelope trimers. Science 2015;349:aac4223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tomaras GD, Ferrari G, Shen X, et al. : Vaccine-induced plasma IgA specific for the C1 region of the HIV-1 envelope blocks binding and effector function of IgG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:9019–9024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Acharya P, Tolbert WD, Gohain N, et al. : Structural definition of an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity response implicated in reduced risk for HIV-1 infection. J Virol 2014;88:12895–12906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Guan Y, Pazgier M, Sajadi MM, et al. : Diverse specificity and effector function among human antibodies to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein epitopes exposed by CD4 binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:E69–E78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Moore JP, McCutchan FE, Poon SW, et al. : Exploration of antigenic variation in gp120 from clades A through F of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by using monoclonal antibodies. J Virol 1994;68:8350–8364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (97.6KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Table1.pdf (55.5KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig2.pdf (99KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Table2.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig3.pdf (91.8KB, pdf)

Articles from AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES