Abstract
Background
Preeclampsia/eclampsia is responsible for upwards of 20% of maternal morbidity and mortality in developing countries.
Objective
We examined the relationship between frequency of food intake and symptoms of preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia among Indian women aged 15-49 (n = 39,657) for the most recent live birth in the 5 years preceding the National Family Health Survey-3 (2005-2006). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between frequency of intake of specific food items, and self-reported symptoms of preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia, adjusting for maternal age, and other potential socio-demographic confounders.
Results
Daily consumption of milk or curd (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.96), green leafy vegetables, chicken/meat and weekly pulses/beans consumption are associated with substantially lower risk of preeclampsia eclampsia. Eclampsia risk is higher among those who consumed fruits (ORs ranges from 1.18 to 1.44) and chicken/meat occasionally (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48), and lower among those consuming vegetables daily.
Conclusion
Frequency of consumption of specific food items is associated with occurrence of preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia symptoms in Indian women.
Keywords: Preeclampsia, eclampsia, food types, frequency of intake, India, National Family Health Survey-3, women
Introduction
Preeclampsia and eclampsia pose significant threats to maternal health, particularly in developing countries. In low-and middle-income settings, these two conditions affect approximately 8% of all pregnancies, causing an estimated 15-20% of maternal morbidity and mortality.[1] Preeclampsia is a life-threatening complication of pregnancy that typically starts after the 20th week of gestation. Women with preeclampsia may present with symptoms such as headache, upper abdominal pain, or visual disturbances and have raised blood pressure, ankle edema and proteinuria. When preeclampsia is left untreated or is severe, giving rise to seizures/convulsions, which cannot be attributed to other causes (such as epilepsy), the condition is known as eclampsia. Although several studies have found that micronutrient deficiencies, such as iron, Vitamin A, Vitamin C, and calcium contribute to preeclampsia risks,[2–5] few studies have actually evaluated the potential role of different food types.
Existing nutritional evidence is highly variable[6] regarding its association with preeclampsia and eclampsia risk. Some studies suggest that dietary patterns may influence maternal antioxidant levels, mediating the link between preeclampsia and oxidative stress, an established risk factor.[7] However, consumption of high-energy diets may increase the risk of preeclampsia by inducing abnormal lipid metabolism while consumption of dietary fiber may regulate these metabolic processes, thereby reducing risk.[8] However, studies that have attempted to test these links empirically have not been conducted in developing countries where majority burden falls, nor have they employed appropriate multivariate models to predict the determinants. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been any previous large-scale report concerning the dietary risk factors for preeclampsia and eclampsia in Indian women. In this study, we evaluate potential dietary risk factors of preeclampsia and eclampsia, using a large representative sample of Indian mothers in the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS) conducted during 2005-2006.
Materials and Methods
Study location and population
Data were taken from the most recent wave of the NFHS-3, 2005-2006), India’s demographic and health surveys. NFHS-3 collected demographic, socioeconomic and health information from a nationally representative probability sample of 124,385 women aged 15-49 residing in 109,341 households. The sample is a multistage cluster sample with an overall response rate of 98%. All states of India are represented in the sample (except the small Union Territories), covering more than 99% of the country’s population. Full details of the survey are available elsewhere.[9] The analysis presented here focuses on 39,657 women in the sample who report being married and who have had a live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey. The survey was conducted using an interviewer-administered questionnaire in the native language of the respondent.
Assessment of pre eclampsia and eclampsia symptoms
To assess the symptoms of pre eclampsia, mothers were asked if at any time during their last pregnancy they experienced relevant symptoms, including difficulty with vision during daylight, night blindness, convulsions (not from fever), swelling of the legs, body or face, excessive fatigue, or vaginal bleeding. According to the WHO criteria (2007),[10] women who reported difficulty with vision during daylight, swelling of the legs, body, or face, or excessive fatigue were coded as having symptoms of pre eclampsia, whereas those who reported experiencing convulsions (not from fever) were coded as symptomatic eclampsia.[10] Data on blood pressure and proteinuria during pregnancy were not available in NFHS-3. Dietary intake variables were based on the self-reported frequency of consumption of milk or curd, green leafy vegetables, fruits, pulses and beans, eggs, fish, chicken or meat, categorized into daily, weekly, occasionally, or never. Potential confounders and covariates were selected on the basis of previous knowledge of their association with pre eclampsia/eclampsia in high-income countries. We used multiple logistic regression to estimate the association between frequency of dietary intake and preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia risk after adjusting for maternal factors, biological and lifestyle factors and socio-demographic characteristics of the mothers. Models were adjusted for sampling weights.[9] All analyses were conducted using the SPSS statistical software package Version 19 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Ethical considerations
The NFHS-3 survey received ethical approval from the International Institute for Population Science’s Ethical Review Board and the Indian Government. Prior informed written consent was obtained from each respondent. The analysis presented in this study is based on secondary analysis of the existing survey data with all identifying information removed.
Results
Overall 55.6% of mothers reported preeclamspia eclampsia symptoms, and 10.3% reported eclampsia. Table 1 reports the results of our statistical models. After adjusting for maternal, biological, and chronic disease risk factors, as well as socio-demographic characteristics, the risk of pre-eclampsia was found significantly lower among women who consumed milk daily (odds ratio [OR]: 0.88;95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.96), green leafy vegetables daily or weekly (OR: 0.69-0.76), pulses or beans at least weekly or occasionally (ORs ranges from 0.84 to 0.92), fruits daily (OR: 0.92), eggs weekly or occasionally, consumes fish (OR: 0.90) or chicken or meat daily or occasionally, with added reference to those who never consumed them. However, a greater risk of pre eclampsia was found among women consuming fruits weekly or occasionally (OR: 1.11), eggs daily (OR: 1.23) and fish weekly (OR: 1.22).
Table 1. Association between Pre-eclampsia/Eclampsia and food consumption, India, 2005-06.
Predictors | Pre-eclampsia | Eclampsia | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted OR [95%CI] |
Adjusted* OR [95%CI] |
Unadjusted OR [95%CI] |
Adjusted* OR [95%CI] |
|
Frequency of intake of specific food items | ||||
Milk or curd | ||||
Never Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Occasionally | 1.06 [0.99-1.14] | 0.97 [0.89-1.06] | 1.08 [0.97-1.20] | 1.02 [0.89-1.18] |
Weekly | 0.99 [0.92-1.07] | 1.04 [0.94-1.15] | 1.03 [0.92-1.17] | 0.99 [0.84-1.17] |
Daily | 0.78 [0.73-0.84] | 0.88 [0.81-0.96] | 0.76 [0.68-0.85] | 0.98 [0.84-1.14] |
Pulses and beans | ||||
Never Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Occasionally | 0.94 [0.74-1.20] | 0.97 [0.72-1.30] | 1.33 [0.86-2.05] | 1.26 [076-2.09] |
Weekly | 0.98 [0.77-1.25] | 0.84 [0.76-0.92] | 1.20 [0.78-1.80] | 1.12 [0.95-1.32] |
Daily | 1.03 [0.80-1.32] | 0.92 [0.83-1.01] | 1.28 [0.82-2.00] | 0.99 [0.85-1.17] |
Green leafy vegetables | ||||
Never/Occasionally Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Weekly | 0.88 [0.81-0.96] | 0.76 [0.68-0.84] | 0.83 [0.73-0.95] | 0.74 [0.62-0.88] |
Daily | 0.87 [0.80-0.094] | 0.69 [0.62-0.77] | 0.87 [0.77-0.99] | 0.79 [0.67-0.94] |
Fruits | ||||
Never Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Occasionally | 0.93 [0.83-1.02] | 1.11 [1.05-1.19] | 0.76 [0.66-0.86] | 1.18 [1.06-1.31] |
Weekly | 0.87 [0.78-0.97] | 1.11 [1.01-1.22] | 0.60 [0.52-0.71] | 1.28 [1.09-1.52] |
Daily | 0.81 [0.72-0.91] | 0.92 [0.80-1.06] | 0.49 [0.41-0.59] | 1.44 [1.17-1.76] |
Eggs | ||||
Never Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Occasionally | 1.15 [1.10-1.21] | 0.97 [0.90-1.04] | 1.10 [1.02-1.18] | 0.76 [0.68-0.86] |
Weekly | 1.00 [0.95-1.05] | 0.86 [0.75-1.00] | 0.64 [0.58-0.70] | 0.61 [0.45-0.83] |
Daily | 0.99 [0.88-1.12] | 1.23 [1.11-1.36] | 0.53 [0.41-0.67] | 1.08 [0.92-1.27] |
Fish | ||||
Never Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Occasionally | 1.23 [1.17-1.29] | 0.90 [0.83-0.98] | 1.22 [1.13-1.31] | 0.62 [0.54-0.72] |
Weekly | 1.10 [1.04-1.16] | 1.22 [1.08-1.37] | 0.73 [0.68-0.81] | 0.44 [0.35-0.57] |
Daily | 1.65 [1.50-1.81] | 0.97 [0.87-1.07] | 0.45 [0.34-0.55] | 0.98 [0.81-1.17] |
Chicken or meat | ||||
Never Ref | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Occasionally | 1.28 [1.23-1.34] | 0.87 [0.81-0.94] | 1.08 [1.01-1.16] | 1.28 [1.11-1.48] |
Weekly | 0.90 [0.85-0.95] | 0.97 [0.74-1.27] | 0.66 [0.60-0.73] | 1.51 [0.98-2.34] |
Daily | 1.38 [1.11-1.72] | 0.87 [0.77-0.98] | 1.03 [0.73-1.46] | 0.99 [0.81-1.21] |
indicates Reference category
Odds ratios adjusted for maternal, biological, and lifestyle factors and sociodemographic characteristics
The risk of eclampsia was lower among those consuming green leafy vegetables (ORs ranges from 0.74 to 0.79), consuming fish weekly or occasionally (ORs ranges from 0.44 to 0.62), eggs weekly or occasionally (ORs ranges from 0.61 to 0.76), but was higher among those who consumed fruits (ORs ranges from 1.18 to 1.44), chicken or meat occasionally (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48) with reference to those who never consumed them.
Discussion
This study provides empirical evidence of an association between the frequency of intake of specific food items and symptoms of pre eclampsia and eclampsia in a large nationally representative sample of Indian women. The findings suggest that the frequency of consumption of specific food items has a substantial effect on the occurrence of symptoms suggestive of preeclampsia eclampsia or eclampsia in Indian women.
Maternal nutritional status and dietary intake has long been hypothesized to have a role in the pathophysiology of pre eclampsia/eclampsia.[11–13] There is increasing evidence lately that nutrition plays an important role in preventing hypertensive disorders[14] a finding potentially salient to eclampsia as a hypertensive condition. A 3 week U.S. based clinical trial[15] found that, a diet rich in fruits and vegetables is associated with a decline in blood pressure, with higher magnitude effects for participants with existing hypertensive conditions. In India, two studies[14,16] have shown that higher intake of fruit and vegetables is linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension but a study among Zimbabwean women found that variation in consumption of specific food items does not have a strong effect on the incidence of preeclampsia.[17] The possible pathway might be that; dietary patterns influence antioxidant levels, mediating the link between pre eclampsia and oxidative stress, an established risk factor for eclampsia.[2,7] Oxidative stress, driven in part by insufficient antioxidant defenses, lowers, polyunsaturated fatty acid levels, which are hypothesized to serve a protective function against vascular endothelial damage.[18] Some studies[19] suggest that inadequate antioxidant and folate intake may contribute to oxidative stress and thereby increase the risk of preeclampsia eclampsia. Lycopene, an antioxidant found in many red fruits and vegetables, also has been associated with a reduced risk.[20]
The strengths of our study include the large nationally representative study sample and the population-level focus on the predictors of pre eclampsia and eclampsia. However, due to the general challenges of measuring hypertensive disorders in population-based studies, the information of the symptoms of preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia presented here is based on self-reports and should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. Although we cannot exclude misclassification within this context, it is unlike that we missed severe preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia cases. Also, we could not identify the gestational onset of pre eclampsia. We included various symptoms of health problems during the last pregnancy of women during the 5 years preceding the survey as a proxy measure for preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia, which is likely to be a poor proxy, but this is the best we have at the national level. The 55.6% and 10.3% prevalence of preeclampsia eclampsia and eclampsia symptoms respectively is probably too high in a population that might likely to be due to over-reporting. It is likely that some women do not understand the question and thus could have overtly reported the symptoms experienced during pregnancy. Although we adjusted for several confounding variables, we cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding in this study. In these analyses, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inferences, and we were limited to the questions used to obtain lifestyle and dietary information.[21]
Globally and more specifically in developing countries, few population level studies exist which assess the dietary determinants of preeclampsia and eclampsia. This study is important because few studies have reported preeclampsia/eclampsia prevalence rates based on population-level data in India. This study implicates that dietary risk factors for preeclampsia and eclampsia exists, and thus there is a need for replication of findings given that the dietary patterns are modifiable. Our study findings may serve as an important call for health care providers to heighten their awareness of the increased population-level risk for preeclampsia and eclampsia disease originating in pregnancy. With the target of the millennium development goals in sight, preeclampsia/eclampsia should be identified as one of the priority areas in reducing maternal and infant mortality and morbidity in India. However, further research involving the use of a more comprehensive dietary measure, pre pregnancy assessment of all the risk factors and ascertainment of dietary intake prior to the development of preeclampsia and eclampsia and accuracy of reporting of the symptoms of preeclampsia and eclampsia are needed in a developing country setting.
Acknowledgments
Source of Support: Nil
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2005;365:785–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17987-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bilodeau JF, Hubel CA. Current concepts in the use of antioxidants for the treatment of preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:742–50. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bodnar LM, Tang G, Ness RB, Harger G, Roberts JM. Periconceptional multivitamin use reduces the risk of preeclampsia. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:470–7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jain S, Sharma P, Kulshreshtha S, Mohan G, Singh S. The role of calcium, magnesium, and zinc in pre-eclampsia. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010;133:162–70. doi: 10.1007/s12011-009-8423-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Levine RJ, Hauth JC, Curet LB, Sibai BM, Catalano PM, Morris CD, et al. Trial of calcium to prevent preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:69–76. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707103370201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Roberts JM, Balk JL, Bodnar LM, Belizán JM, Bergel E, Martinez A. Nutrient involvement in preeclampsia. J Nutr. 2003;133(5 Suppl 2):1684S–92. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.5.1684S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scholl TO, Leskiw M, Chen X, Sims M, Stein TP. Oxidative stress, diet, and the etiology of preeclampsia. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:1390–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.6.1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu H, Shatenstein B, Luo ZC, Wei S, Fraser W. Role of nutrition in the risk of preeclampsia. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:639–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 10.World Health Organisation. Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: A guide for midwives and doctors. Department of Reproductive Health and Research. WHO; Geneva: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chesley LC. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1978. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roberts JM. Recent advances: obstetrics. BMJ. 2000;321:33–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7252.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roberts JM, Bodnar LM. Report on the WIC Nutrition Risk Criterion for Hypertension in Pregnancy. Prepared for the US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Srinath Reddy K, Katan MB. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:167–86. doi: 10.1079/phn2003587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sacks FM, Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, et al. A dietary approach to prevent hypertension: A review of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Study. Clin Cardiol. 1999;22:III6–10. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960221503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Radhika G, Sudha V, Mohan Sathya R, Ganesan A, Mohan V. Association of fruit and vegetable intake with cardiovascular risk factors in urban south Indians. Br J Nutr. 2008;99:398–405. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507803965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Atkinson JO, Mahomed K, Williams MA, Woelk GB, Mudzamiri S, Weiss NS. Dietary risk factors for pre-eclampsia among women attending Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med. 1998;44:86–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mehendale S, Kilari A, Dangat K, Taralekar V, Mahadik S, Joshi S. Fatty acids, antioxidants, and oxidative stress in pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100:234–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roberts JM, Lain KY. Recent Insights into the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Placenta. 2002;23:359–72. doi: 10.1053/plac.2002.0819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sharma JB, Sharma A, Bahadur A, Vimala N, Satyam A, Mittal S. Oxidative stress markers and antioxidant levels in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;94:23–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pullum TW. Methodological Reports No. 6. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International Inc; 2008. An Assessment of the Quality of Data on Health and Nutrition in the DHS Surveys, 1993-2003. [Google Scholar]