Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1992 Feb;11(2):741–750. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05107.x

IS10 transposase mutations that specifically alter target site recognition.

J Bender 1, N Kleckner 1
PMCID: PMC556507  PMID: 1311257

Abstract

IS10 inserts preferentially into particular hotspots. We describe here mutations of IS10 transposase, called 'ATS' that confer Altered Target Specificity. These mutations yield a general relaxation in target specificity but do not affect other aspects of transposition. Thus, the preference for specific nucleotide sequences at the target site can be cleanly separated from other steps of the transposition reaction. Eleven ATS mutations identified in a genetic screen occur at only two codons in transposase, one in each of two regions of the protein previously implicated in target site interactions (Patch I and Patch II). Genetic analysis suggests that mutations at the two ATS codons affect the same specific function of transposase, thus raising the possibility that Patch I and Patch II interact. For wild-type IS10, insertion specificity is determined in part by a specific 6 bp consensus sequence and in part by the immediately adjacent sequence context of the target DNA. The ATS mutations do not qualitatively alter the hierarchy with which base pairs are recognized in the consensus sequence; instead, sites selected by ATS transposase exhibit a reduction in the degree to which certain base pairs are preferred over others. Models for the basis of this phenotype are discussed.

Full text

PDF
741

Images in this article

742Image
on p.742
742Image
on p.742
746Image
on p.746

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bass S., Sorrells V., Youderian P. Mutant Trp repressors with new DNA-binding specificities. Science. 1988 Oct 14;242(4876):240–245. doi: 10.1126/science.3140377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bender J., Kleckner N. Genetic evidence that Tn10 transposes by a nonreplicative mechanism. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):801–815. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90555-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Intramolecular transposition by Tn10. Cell. 1989 Oct 20;59(2):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90298-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clewell D. B., Helinski D. R. Properties of a supercoiled deoxyribonucleic acid-protein relaxation complex and strand specificity of the relaxation event. Biochemistry. 1970 Oct 27;9(22):4428–4440. doi: 10.1021/bi00824a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danielsen M., Hinck L., Ringold G. M. Two amino acids within the knuckle of the first zinc finger specify DNA response element activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1131–1138. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Molecular basis of DNA sequence recognition by the catabolite gene activator protein: detailed inferences from three mutations that alter DNA sequence specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(23):7274–7278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.23.7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ebright R. H., Cossart P., Gicquel-Sanzey B., Beckwith J. Mutations that alter the DNA sequence specificity of the catabolite gene activator protein of E. coli. Nature. 1984 Sep 20;311(5983):232–235. doi: 10.1038/311232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Foster T. J., Davis M. A., Roberts D. E., Takeshita K., Kleckner N. Genetic organization of transposon Tn10. Cell. 1981 Jan;23(1):201–213. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90285-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gardella T., Moyle H., Susskind M. M. A mutant Escherichia coli sigma 70 subunit of RNA polymerase with altered promoter specificity. J Mol Biol. 1989 Apr 20;206(4):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90567-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Halling S. M., Kleckner N. A symmetrical six-base-pair target site sequence determines Tn10 insertion specificity. Cell. 1982 Jan;28(1):155–163. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90385-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Halling S. M., Simons R. W., Way J. C., Walsh R. B., Kleckner N. DNA sequence organization of IS10-right of Tn10 and comparison with IS10-left. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Apr;79(8):2608–2612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.8.2608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haniford D. B., Benjamin H. W., Kleckner N. Kinetic and structural analysis of a cleaved donor intermediate and a strand transfer intermediate in Tn10 transposition. Cell. 1991 Jan 11;64(1):171–179. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90218-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haniford D. B., Chelouche A. R., Kleckner N. A specific class of IS10 transposase mutants are blocked for target site interactions and promote formation of an excised transposon fragment. Cell. 1989 Oct 20;59(2):385–394. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90299-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heitman J., Model P. Mutants of the EcoRI endonuclease with promiscuous substrate specificity implicate residues involved in substrate recognition. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3369–3378. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07538.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huisman O., Errada P. R., Signon L., Kleckner N. Mutational analysis of IS10's outside end. EMBO J. 1989 Jul;8(7):2101–2109. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03619.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huisman O., Kleckner N. A new generalizable test for detection of mutations affecting Tn10 transposition. Genetics. 1987 Jun;116(2):185–189. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kleckner N., Barker D. F., Ross D. G., Botstein D. Properties of the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10 in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda. Genetics. 1978 Nov;90(3):427–461. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.3.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kleckner N., Bender J., Gottesman S. Uses of transposons with emphasis on Tn10. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:139–180. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04009-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kleckner N. DNA sequence analysis of Tn10 insertions: origin and role of 9 bp flanking repetitions during Tn10 translocation. Cell. 1979 Apr;16(4):711–720. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90087-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lodge J. K., Weston-Hafer K., Berg D. E. Transposon Tn5 target specificity: preference for insertion at G/C pairs. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):645–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mader S., Kumar V., de Verneuil H., Chambon P. Three amino acids of the oestrogen receptor are essential to its ability to distinguish an oestrogen from a glucocorticoid-responsive element. Nature. 1989 Mar 16;338(6212):271–274. doi: 10.1038/338271a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Maurer R., Meyer B., Ptashne M. Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) bacteriophage lambda. I. OR3 and autogenous negative control by repressor. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 15;139(2):147–161. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90302-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McClarin J. A., Frederick C. A., Wang B. C., Greene P., Boyer H. W., Grable J., Rosenberg J. M. Structure of the DNA-Eco RI endonuclease recognition complex at 3 A resolution. Science. 1986 Dec 19;234(4783):1526–1541. doi: 10.1126/science.3024321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mizuuchi K., Craigie R. Mechanism of bacteriophage mu transposition. Annu Rev Genet. 1986;20:385–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.20.120186.002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Myers R. M., Lerman L. S., Maniatis T. A general method for saturation mutagenesis of cloned DNA fragments. Science. 1985 Jul 19;229(4710):242–247. doi: 10.1126/science.2990046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roberts T. M., Kacich R., Ptashne M. A general method for maximizing the expression of a cloned gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):760–764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sargueil B., Hatat D., Delahodde A., Jacq C. In vivo and in vitro analyses of an intron-encoded DNA endonuclease from yeast mitochondria. Recognition site by site-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 11;18(19):5659–5665. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.19.5659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sartorius J., Lehming N., Kisters B., von Wilcken-Bergmann B., Müller-Hill B. lac repressor mutants with double or triple exchanges in the recognition helix bind specifically to lac operator variants with multiple exchanges. EMBO J. 1989 Apr;8(4):1265–1270. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03500.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Simons R. W., Houman F., Kleckner N. Improved single and multicopy lac-based cloning vectors for protein and operon fusions. Gene. 1987;53(1):85–96. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90095-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Treisman J., Gönczy P., Vashishtha M., Harris E., Desplan C. A single amino acid can determine the DNA binding specificity of homeodomain proteins. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):553–562. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90038-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Umesono K., Evans R. M. Determinants of target gene specificity for steroid/thyroid hormone receptors. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1139–1146. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Way J. C., Davis M. A., Morisato D., Roberts D. E., Kleckner N. New Tn10 derivatives for transposon mutagenesis and for construction of lacZ operon fusions by transposition. Gene. 1984 Dec;32(3):369–379. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wharton R. P., Ptashne M. A new-specificity mutant of 434 repressor that defines an amino acid-base pair contact. 1987 Apr 30-May 6Nature. 326(6116):888–891. doi: 10.1038/326888a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Youderian P., Vershon A., Bouvier S., Sauer R. T., Susskind M. M. Changing the DNA-binding specificity of a repressor. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90110-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES