Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2017 Jul 19;4(3):188–197. doi: 10.1007/s40473-017-0122-9

Mechanisms of Cognitive Aging in the HIV-Positive Adult

Asante Kamkwalala 1, Paul Newhouse 1,2
PMCID: PMC5565228  NIHMSID: NIHMS894236  PMID: 28840088

Abstract

Purpose of Review

As of the year 2016, an estimated 50% of the United States' HIV-Positive population is aged 50 years or older. Due to a combination of increased rates of infection in older adults, and successful anti-retroviral (ART) regimens allowing HIV-positive adults to survive for decades with the disease, we are now faced with a steadily graying HIV-positive population, with only limited knowledge of how the cognitive and physiological effects of aging intersect with those of chronic HIV-infection.

Recent Findings

Age-related changes to mood, cognition, and neurological health may be experienced differently in those living with HIV, and research concerning quality of life, mental health, and cognitive aging needs to account for and explore these factors more carefully in the coming years.

Summary

This review will explore the topic of cognitive aging with HIV: 1. Central nervous system (CNS) infection of HIV and how the virus affects brain integrity and function; 2. Cognitive and behavioral symptoms of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND); 3. Neurobiological theories of Cognitive Aging and how these processes may be exacerbated by HIV-infection; 4: Clinical implications and complications of aging with HIV and factors that may result in poorer cognitive outcomes.

Keywords: Aging, HIV-1, HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders, Cholinergic, Dopaminergic

Introduction

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) affects more than 1 million people in the US [1]. Though it is still a life-threatening diagnosis, many HIV-positive adults have survived the initial epidemic in the early 1980's and continue to live relatively stable, healthy lives with the disease. As the HIV-positive population survives with the disease, management of the added complications of age-related changes to their physical, mental and cognitive health becomes a more significant challenge. As the face of the HIV-positive population changes, so too should the considerations of clinicians who treat them. Older age is associated with cognitive and motor changes as well as the development of brain pathologies. Cognitive functioning is additionally vulnerable to HIV-related damage, particularly if the individual is infected late in life, goes undiagnosed or untreated for some time after exposure, or if they have lived with the disease for more than a decade.

The combination of pathological processes may interact, resulting in an HIV-positive population that may experience significant impairments earlier than their HIV-negative counterparts. Current estimates indicate that roughly 50% of the US HIV-positive population is currently aged 50 years or older [1, 2], which makes understanding the unique nuances of aging with HIV a concern for researchers, clinicians, and patients alike. This review will discuss the cognitive, clinical, and behavioral considerations facing a “greying” HIV-positive population, and factors that may contribute to better outcomes for older adults living with this disease.

I. Pathology of Central Nervous System (CNS) HIV Infection

In most HIV-positive adults, strict compliance with an anti-retroviral therapy (ART) regimen results in low systemic viral loads and high T-Cell counts[3]. However the HIV virus is able to enter and infect cells that express the CD4 co-receptor, in addition to either the CCR5 or CXCR4 receptor, via the envelope glycoprotein 120 (gp120). The virus thus travels to the brain via monocytes, where it can cross the blood brain barrier by infecting vascular epithelial cells, allowing it to access to the brain parenchyma. Once in the brain, the virus can directly infect astrocytes and oligodendrites, which replicate the virus and subsequently die, releasing a host of neurotoxic chemokines including Tnf, Tat-1, Vpr, interleukin 6, nitric oxide, and quinolinic and arachidonic acids [4].

CNS infection by the HIV-virus adds an additional complication because many existing ART medications cannot cross the blood-brain-barrier, turning the central nervous system into a viral “reservoir” where the virus can continue to replicate without being affected by medication [5]. The time between initial infection and initiation of treatment has been shown to have an effect on extent of CNS damage [6], essentially the less time the virus is able to replicate unchecked peripherally, the better cognitive outcomes, and lower risk of developing cognitive impairments.

The resulting inflammatory cascades from these chemokines trigger the persistent recruitment and activation of microglia, which attempt to clear the brain of the dead and dying cells [7-9]. Excessive neuroinflammation leads to the progressive death of glia (oligodendrocytes and astrocytes) leaving local neurons vulnerable to glutamate excitotoxicity, resulting in diffuse, progressively worsening neurodegeneration [10, 11].

Once introduced to the brain tissue, HIV-related damage follows a selective “sub-cortical” pattern, accelerating deterioration of connectivity, processing, and association areas [12]. Damage typically affects fronto-striatal structures and both structural and functional connectivity [13, 14] as well as hippocampal tissue [15] and motor areas [16, 17]. Abnormal fMRI pre-frontal activation during working memory tasks [18], increased measures of inflammation and diffusivity [19], and reduced resting state functional connectivity within the lateral occipital network [20], and overall cortical thinning [21, 22] have all been observed in HIV-positive adults relative to HIV-negative controls, and in many of these studies the structural changes were in excess of that to be expected given participant age.

There is also evidence that in HIV-positive adults, risk biomarkers related to Alzheimer's disease confer an additional burden; HIV-positive adults with at least one APOE-e4 gene have been found to have more severe markers of brain atrophy [23], higher risk of developing the most severe form of HAND [24], and higher deposition of damaging brain amyloid [25].

II. HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND)

Central Nervous system (CNS) viral load, and subsequently the extent of resulting neurodegeneration processes, is thought to be responsible for the symptoms of the cognitive impairments known collectively as HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders, or HAND [26]. HAND is identified diagnostically by neurocognitive performance at least 1 standard deviation below the mean (normalized for age and education) in at least 2 of the following domains of cognition: language, attention, working memory, learning, information processing, sensory perception, and motor skills [27]. HAND ranges from the mildest form, asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), to the most commonly found mild neurocognitive disorder (MND), to the most severe, HIV associated dementia (HAD). Symptoms tend to progress from ANI to MND with longer infection time, though early ART medication has reduced prevalence of HAD [28]. Despite the success of antiretroviral medications to keep CD4+ cell counts high, it has been hypothesized that the inability of these medications to cross the blood brain barrier turns the brain into a ‘viral reservoir’, where the virus can continue to replicate, leading to continuing neurological damage over time [29].

HAND severity over time can be predicted by CD4+ cell count at treatment initiation, with decreased chance of cognitive impairment if antiretroviral treatment is initiated as soon as possible after exposure, while CD4+ counts are still high and viral load is still relatively low [26]. The impaired immune response caused by HIV leads to a premature, persistent inflammatory state, when this is combined with the neurological and cognitive changes associated with aging, presumably physiological and cognitive changes may occur more rapidly [30].

HAND is a common late-stage outcome of the HIV-1 virus infection, affecting more than 50% of seropositive individuals. HAND symptoms result from neurodegeneration caused by the infiltration of the virus into the brain, and is characterized by a number of cognitive deficits [31]: one study found that cognitively asymptomatic HIV-positive individuals displayed abnormal visual spatial attention processing compared to HIV-negative controls [32], another found that HIV-positive individuals showed significant deficits in verbal working memory storage and processing [33], and another group characterized immediate, delayed (auditory/visual), and working memory deficits in HIV-positive males compared to controls, which they attributed to subcortical gray and white matter damage due to HIV infection [34].

There has also been investigation into biomarkers for cognitive outcomes in adults with HIV. One study found subtle frontal grey matter changes in older HIV-positive men when compared to younger and HIV-negative men, despite no significant differences in cognition [35]. In another study comparing HIV- individuals and HIV+ individuals with and without cognitive deficits, it was found that while asymptomatic HIV-positive individuals showed increased BOLD activation in regions necessary for bottom-up (exogenous) and top-down (endogenous) attention control compared to HIV-negative individuals as the task difficulty increased, implying higher cognitive effort and use of cognitive reserve, HIV-positive individuals meeting HAND criteria showed no increase in activity, and impaired performance even at the moderate difficulty, which they interpreted as the virus diminishing the capacity of cognitive reserve [36].

Less is known about the cognitive consequences of aging with HIV compared to normal aging. One study found that in HIV-positive individuals, age over 50 years increased the risk of developing a cognitive disorder three-fold compared to HIV-negatve controls [37], and another found that aging and positive HIV status had an adverse, additive impact on learning and executive functioning [38]. In contrast, large cohort studies evaluating the effects age and HIV status on neuropsychological performance, found no evidence for increased impairment of performance [39, 40].

Perhaps because of advances in ART medication, the milder cognitive impairments of HAND (ANI and MND) are becoming more common, and HAD is becoming less common [41], so understanding the mechanisms of these impairments as well as any interaction with age has implications for long-term treatment and quality of life as the HIV-positive population lives longer. As research into the aging HIV population continues, it may be useful in this population to study cell and receptor populations in the brain that have already been associated with the cognitive aging process, such as the cholinergic and dopaminergic receptor system. Existing knowledge of age-related changes to these systems, the cognitive impairment associated with dysfunction, and how they may overlap with cognitive symptoms seen in HIV-positive individuals, could provide useful insight into how mechanisms of the cognitive aging process are altered by the presence of HIV, and how neurotransmitter-based treatments may be beneficial.

III. Normal Cognitive Aging

Normal cognitive aging is the progressive changes to cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, psychomotor functioning, that progressively worsen as an individual ages, starting in the 50's and 60's in the normal population [42, 43]. Neuronal loss, loss of connectivity, and alterations in task-related activation patterns within the brain all contribute to outward symptoms of cognitive aging [44-47], particularly the dopaminergic and cholinergic neurotransmitter systems. The functioning of the cholinergic and dopaminergic systems, and cognitive performance are affected by advancing age [48] which may lead to effects on cognitive abilities such as attention and executive control. These domains and other cognitive functions rely on adequate functioning of projections of the cholinergic neurotransmitter system [49, 50], which modulate other neurotransmitter systems via nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholinergic receptors [51]. The dopaminergic system primarily controls reward processing [52, 53] but is also associated with spatial and verbal working memory [54, 55] and cognitive flexibility [56]. All these functions are similarly vulnerable to neuronal and connectivity loss with advancing age, particularly loss of functioning of D2 receptors [57] and the dopamine transporter [57, 58], in conjunction with modulatory changes from the cholinergic system [59]. Both the cholinergic and dopaminergic systems lose necessary receptor density and connectivity, with aging associated with cognitive changes in performance [60, 61].

Cholinergic System

The functioning of the cholinergic system related to cognitive performance was first explained using temporary blockade studies; cholinergic antagonist drugs such as mecamylamine or scopolamine result in deficits of learning, memory, psychomotor speed, and attention [62, 63, 50, 64]. This effect is more pronounced in older individuals, and this increase in sensitivity with age has been associated with fewer available cholinergic receptors and/or projections. The similarity between symptoms of cholinergic blockade and the cognitive impairments seen with advancing age are described by the cholinergic theory of cognitive aging [50], which suggests that the progressive decline of cholinergic receptor activity has a negative impact on cognition, which may be rescued by cholinergic agonists.

Cognitive aging may be partly due to a decline in cholinergic system function and the progressive loss of cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain nuclei [65]. Decrease in projections, and decrease in expression of nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholinesterase receptors (nAChRs and mAChRs) with age results in an increase in sensitivity to cholinergic blockade [66]. In particular, impairment of the nAChR system is associated with deficits of attention and working memory, and thought to be involved in the cognitive symptoms seen in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and others, such as slowed reaction time, sustained attention deficits, sensory gating and working memory problems [67]. It has been shown that availability of nAChRs decreases with age, and this loss is more profound in individuals suffering from cognitive disorders [68]. In these cases, as nAChRs are lost, exogenous activation of the remaining receptors may be a useful strategy to maintain or improve cognitive performance impaired by these or other disorders.

Dopaminergic System

The presence of catecholamine neurotransmitters, specifically dopamine, is necessary for normal functioning of complex neurological and cognitive functioning [69]. Originating in the basal ganglia (nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra, striatum) and heavily enervating the frontal cortices, dopamine availability is involved in attention, decision making, learning and reward processing [63]. In the context of cognition, dopamine activity is important for reward and decision processing [53, 70], visuospatial working memory [55], as well as attention and working memory, with modulation from the cholinergic system as well [69, 59].

Dopamine acts through two main receptor subtypes, the D1DR and D2DR, and the two receptors modulate slightly different cognitive functions [71-73]. Dopamine activity at D2 receptors is associated with memory function, and loss of these receptors with age has been associated with poorer memory functional connectivity between the hippocampus and caudate [74] The release of dopamine is closely modulated by cholinergic receptors, allowing for fine tuning of working memory [59].

Aging has demonstrable effects on the ability of dopamine to regulate cognitive functions, particularly as receptors and dopaminergic cells are lost in cases of pathological aging. Older age is associated with lower dopaminergic activity in the ventral striatum and pre-frontal cortex, resulting in poorer ability to process reward [70]. Dopamine has also been shown to be involved in the process of memory dedifferentiation (the loss of distinct neural representations of information), and reduced dopamine availability is associated with poorer memory specificity in older adults [75]Older adults also show decreases in dopamine mediated measures of cognitive flexibility, Loss of D1DR density in the caudate and dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex in older adults is associated with poorer working memory performance and higher blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) neural activation variability (a measure of lower task attention) [76]. Decreased connectivity has been found between the locus coeruleus (another dopaminergic region), with parahippocampal cortex in older adults [77], consistent with other studies that have linked this loss of connectivity to working memory, attention and executive control impairments of mild cognitive impairment.

Genetically, polymorphisms in the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) gene, necessary for dopamine metabolism, also have distinct effects on stability of cognitive functions with age. The Val158Met polymorphism is the most common, and has been assessed in multiple studies of dopamine availability and the subsequent impact on cognitive ability. Presence of the Met amino acid at this position confers a “low activity” phenotype (slower degradation of dopamine and other catecholamines), versus the Val amino acid which confers a “high activity” phenotype, resulting in different rates of loss of synaptic dopamine after release.

One study found that older adults homozygous for the COMT*Val allele performed significantly more poorly on both working memory and episodic memory tasks compared to heterozygous or homozygous COMT*Met adults [78].

Potential Roles of Cholinergic and Dopaminergic Systems in HIV-Associated Cognitive Changes

Some early work has been done to evaluate changes to the dopamine and cholinergic system in the HIV-positive brain, particularly in older adults, though much of it is in the context of the effects of stimulant drug use (methamphetamines, cocaine, etc). One study found a number of structural and connectivity differences in brain regions heavily innervated by dopaminergic and cholinergic inputs, associated with HIV-status: decreased connectivity within the resting state fronto-striatal network (FSN), between FSN and caudate, and between the caudate and parietal regions relative to controls [14]. Diminished capacity for dopamine-mediated attention and reward processing, has also been shown in HIV-positive adults; researchers found reduced ability to ignore irrelevant information while processing a reward [79]. Neurological vulnerabilities in these systems may indicate that HIV virus preferentially targets these dopaminergic and cholinergic regions, and that they may deteriorate faster in HIV positive adults than in HIV-negative adults.

HIV-related proteins, specifically HIV-tat and gp120, have been shown to interact with both cholinergic and dopaminergic receptors, facilitating cell death and subsequent cognitive impairment. The gp120 molecule, a surface protein of the HIV virus capsule, has been shown to bind to the highly calcium permeable homomeric α7-nAChR [80], upregulating receptor production, leading to astrocyte death, and subsequent apoptosis of nearby neurons, particularly in the striatum [81]. Another group also showed that gp120 may facilitate the production of reactive oxygen species that increase apoptotic loss of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra, causing some of the Parkinsonian-like motor impairments that are present in HAND [82]. HIV-tat has been shown to be toxic to both cholinergic and dopaminergic cell populations, particularly in the hypothalamus and the hippocampus, where the protein can more readily cross the blood brain barrier and damage cells in those regions [83]. Indeed, the extra-pyramidal symptoms of HAND do resemble those in Parkinson's disease, resulting from HIV-related damage to the caudate, putamen, substantia nigra, and basal ganglia [84-87].

Co-Morbid Neurodegeneration

HIV-positive older adults may have to face the combined symptoms of HAND and Alzheimer's Disease [88], while others may instead experience the combination of HAND and Parkinson's Disease [89]. These disease combinations may present additional complications of slightly differing symptom profiles. One study evaluated deficit pattern differences between Older HIV positive adults, adults with Parkinsons, and adults with Alzheimer's, finding that while there was some symptom overlap between aging with HIV and each of these age-related disorders, aging with HIV is somewhere in between a “cortical” and “subcortical” cognitive disorder [90].

Mood Disorders in an Aging HIV-Positive Population

Cognitive health and mental health have been shown to be closely linked, particularly in older adults. Somatic symptoms of depression and anxiety can contribute to poorer cognitive outcomes, and vice versa [91]. The added complication of aging with HIV, a disorder with a well-documented high incidence of mood disorders, in particular major depression, poses a significant risk for worsening of cognitive outcomes compared to the HIV-negative population. Not only are older persons more vulnerable to more persistent depressive symptoms despite treatment [92], but depression in this older population is associated with cognitive impairments in and of itself: in the domains of executive functioning, processing speed, episodic memory, all of which are already impaired by the process of cognitive aging [93, 94]. In HIV-positive adults, this higher incidence of cognitive and mood disorders [95] can also exacerbate risk of substance abuse, relative to younger HIV-positive adults or older HIV-negative adults [96] and the combination of these factors may impact quality of life [97, 98]. Treating mood symptoms without addressing cognitive impairments may be one reason that depression symptoms are less responsive to treatment in older and HIV-positive persons, and more consistent monitoring and treatment of both may lead to better outcomes.

IV. Clinical Implications, Comorbidities, and Management for Aging with HIV

Assessing and Monitoring Cognitive Symptoms in HIV-Positive Older Adults

With the knowledge that a substantial proportion of the HIV-positive population will develop some degree of cognitive impairment over the course of their life, it is important that cognitive evaluations become more widespread within HIV clinics. There currently isn't a consensus as to which measures are appropriate and sensitive to accurately detect individual cognitive changes over time. Many HIV clinics routinely provide biological, physiological, sociological and psychiatric monitoring of their HIV patient's well-being, in many cases combining a number of these various follow-ups into a single, comprehensive visit. Cognitive monitoring however, is a relatively new concept, and as this field continues expanding, clinicians and researchers alike should consider how best to address on-going cognitive assessment, particularly in patients over the age of 40. Like many other facets of HIV-related health care, such as CD4 count, detectable vs. undetectable viral load, educating the patient on their risk for cognitive changes, what to expect, and when to alert their caregivers to changes, may be helpful to identify when further assessment and monitoring is warranted.

In order to better identify and monitor symptoms as efficiently as possible, it is important to evaluate which cognitive measures are sensitive enough, easily administered, and correlate well with objective deficits in cognitive function. In the cognitive aging literature, subjective cognitive impairment, or the patient's own appraisal of how their memory is functioning, has shown some success in adults with age-related cognitive disorders, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early stages of Alzheimer's disease [99-101], though not as reliably in cognitively normal older adults. One study has shown that the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was able to detect cognitive impairments in aging HIV-positive veterans [102]. Another study also recently showed that scores on the subjective Memory Functioning Questionnaire (MFQ) significantly correlated with an objective verbal memory performance in HIV-positive middle aged adults, but not HIV-negative adults [103], suggesting that in cognitively vulnerable or impaired HIV-positive adults, comprehensive subjective measures of memory may be a salient and useful monitoring tool to identify those who may be developing objective cognitive impairments.

Potential for Cognitive Enhancers for HAND and Age-Related Cognitive Impairment in HIV

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs), which target and inhibit the metabolism of endogenous acetylcholine, have been used for years as treatment for the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. With prior evidence that HIV-positive adults with the APOE-e4 allele (one of the primary risk genes for developing AD) suffer significantly greater impairments in executive functioning, memory fluency, attention and working memory than HIV-negative or non-APOE-e4 carriers [104], it has been suggested that AChEIs may provide improvement in HAND symptoms, similar to their efficacy in AD [reviewed by 105]. Galantamine has been shown to work synergistically with nicotine to attenuate the over activation of microglia that trigger inflammatory cascades in the HIV-infected CNS [106]. However, rivastigmine was found to only have an effect on psychomotor speed, while Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) scores were unchanged compared to placebo [107]. Pyridostigmine has also been shown to alleviate the over activity of acetylcholine mediated over-activity of T-Cells compared to placebo [108], and though this drug does not cross into the CNS, it may be beneficial to control peripheral viral activity, helping to prevent additional viral particles from crossing into the brain.

With the only moderate efficacy of AChEIs, nicotinic agonists may be a worthwhile therapeutic alternative to target the cholinergic system, Nicotinic agonists function in the brain by enhancing the flux of ions primarily through the two major ionotropic nicotinic receptor subtypes, the heteromeric α4β2*-n AChR and the homomeric α7-nAChR [109]. In the CNS, nAChRs are distributed widely in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, and a significant portion of these receptors are located on the axon terminals of neurons that release glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, etc. [110], allowing nAChR activity to directly modulate the activity of other CNS transmitters [111]. Treatment with nicotinic agonists therefore may be beneficial to help support cognitive ability and neurological function of necessary neurotransmitter systems.

Nicotine itself is the most readily available agonist, available in the form of transdermal patches. It has also been suggested that the high incidence of cigarette smoking in the HIV-positive population (up to 70% by some estimates) may be a form of cognitive self-medication [112, 113]. A number of cholinergic (nicotinic and muscarinic) therapies are in development or in clinical trials to treat the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's [114] and these may have similarly beneficial effects on cognitive deficits associated with HAND, by targeting similarly impaired neurobiological targets.

As far as dopaminergic treatment options, only one study has evaluated a dopaminergic stimulant drug (methylphenidate) and its effect on cognitive ability in HIV-positive older adults, finding that cognitively symptomatic adults showed improvement in choice reaction time scores, though there was no effect in the asymptomatic participants [115]. Additional studies with dopaminergic drugs, such as other stimulant medications should be explored, to assess whether there is any definitive evidence of cognitive benefit for the portion of HIV-related cognitive deficits that can be attributed to dopaminergic system dysfunction.

V. Conclusions

There are numerous factors that complicate brain aging in the HIV-positive population. Early CNS infiltration of the HIV virus leads to an ongoing inflammatory and neurodegenerative process that is closely linked to the cognitive impairments of HAND, which may affect older HIV-positive adults more significantly than their younger or HIV-negative counterparts. Damage to the dopaminergic and cholinergic neurotransmitter systems in particular may contribute to the particular collection of symptoms that are seen in older HIV-positive adults. Investigating and leveraging these systems individually or synergistically may lead to treatment opportunities to improve quality of life as these individuals survive into old age, by supporting their functioning for longer before impairments are noticeable. Furthermore, understanding how dopaminergic and cholinergic systems are affected, may indicate that treatments targeted at maintaining function, or perhaps protection of these regions, may lead to better cognitive outcomes as HIV-positive individuals age.

Understanding both cognitive and psychomotor elements of cognitive aging with HIV may lead to more concrete approaches to both identification of symptoms, and treatments to manage those symptoms, by stimulating these underlying systems to improve cognitive outcomes as HIV-positive individuals age. In HIV positive adults, these approaches may also need to take into account how ART needs may change when administered to an older or more cognitively impaired patient. Age-related changes in blood brain barrier integrity may alter how well established ART regimens can penetrate the CNS, though how that may affect cognition is not yet known.

Early identification, monitoring, and management of cognitive impairments and symptoms are worthwhile additions to comprehensive HIV disease management, particularly in patients who are aging into their 60's, 70's and beyond. Regular cognitive screening, particularly as the HIV-positive patient population ages, may allow both patients and caregivers time to adjust, or to consider options to remediate symptoms, before they have progressed significantly. Treatments targeting the cholinergic or dopaminergic systems are worthwhile considerations for many reasons, one in particular being that regardless of the underlying cause of cognitive impairments, they still are effective at improving cognitive performance. Age-related impairments in HIV-positive adults may respond similarly, especially in a population already at higher risk for cognitive problems. Overall, better understanding of the nuances of aging with HIV versus normal aging, will allow this vulnerable population to not only survive into old age, but thrive.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the following funding sources: Vanderbilt CTSA NCATS UL1TR000445, Vanderbilt Center for AIDS Research Developmental Core Pilot Grant

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: Asante Kamkwalala and Dr. Paul Newhouse declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines: Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

References of importance: Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.Torian L, Chen M, Hall IH. HIV Surveillance — United States, 1981–2008. Centers for DIsease Control and Prevention: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011;60(21):689–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vance DE, McGuinness T, Musgrove K, Orel NA, Fazeli PL. Successful aging and the epidemiology of HIV. Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:181–92. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S14726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •3.Chan P, Brew BJ. HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders in the Modern Antiviral Treatment Era: Prevalence, Characteristics, Biomarkers, and Effects of Treatment. Current HIV/AIDS reports. 2014;11(3):317–24. doi: 10.1007/s11904-014-0221-0. Comprehensive review addressing the milder persistent cognitive impairments associated with HIV, despite effective anti-retroviral therapy. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzalez-Scarano F, Martin-Garcia J. The neuropathogenesis of AIDS. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5(1):69–81. doi: 10.1038/nri1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anthony IC, Ramage SN, Carnie FW, Simmonds P, Bell JE. Influence of HAART on HIV-related CNS disease and neuroinflammation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005;64(6):529–36. doi: 10.1093/jnen/64.6.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crum-Cianflone NF, Moore DJ, Letendre S, Poehlman Roediger M, Eberly L, Weintrob A, et al. Low prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in early diagnosed and managed HIV-infected persons. Neurology. 2013;80(4):371–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garden GA. Microglia in human immunodeficiency virus-associated neurodegeneration. Glia. 2002;40(2):240–51. doi: 10.1002/glia.10155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaul M, Lipton SA. Chemokines and activated macrophages in HIV gp120-induced neuronal apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(14):8212–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zauli G, Secchiero P, Rodella L, Gibellini D, Mirandola P, Mazzoni M, et al. HIV-1 Tat-mediated inhibition of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene expression in dopaminergic neuronal cells. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(6):4159–65. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grant I. Neurocognitive disturbances in HIV. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2008;20(1):33–47. doi: 10.1080/09540260701877894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Harezlak J, Buchthal S, Taylor M, Schifitto G, Zhong J, Daar E, et al. Persistence of HIV-associated cognitive impairment, inflammation, and neuronal injury in era of highly active antiretroviral treatment. AIDS. 2011;25(5):625–33. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283427da7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ••12.Pfefferbaum A, Rogosa DA, Rosenbloom MJ, Chu W, Sassoon SA, Kemper CA, et al. Accelerated aging of selective brain structures in human immunodeficiency virus infection: a controlled, longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(7):1755–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.01.008. Study examining the combined deleterious effects of HIV and aging on brain tissue volume, likely associated with more severe and premature cognitive impairments relative to HIV-negative older adults. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Melrose RJ, Tinaz S, Castelo JM, Courtney MG, Stern CE. Compromised fronto-striatal functioning in HIV: an fMRI investigation of semantic event sequencing. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188(2):337–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ipser JC, Brown GG, Bischoff-Grethe A, Connolly CG, Ellis RJ, Heaton RK, et al. HIV infection is associated with attenuated frontostriatal intrinsic connectivity: a preliminary study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015;21(3):203–13. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Castelo JM, Sherman SJ, Courtney MG, Melrose RJ, Stern CE. Altered hippocampal-prefrontal activation in HIV patients during episodic memory encoding. Neurology. 2006;66(11):1688–95. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000218305.09183.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sullivan EV, Rosenbloom MJ, Rohlfing T, Kemper CA, Deresinski S, Pfefferbaum A. Pontocerebellar contribution to postural instability and psychomotor slowing in HIV infection without dementia. Brain imaging and behavior. 2011;5(1):12–24. doi: 10.1007/s11682-010-9107-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Itoh K, Mehraein P, Weis S. Neuronal damage of the substantia nigra in HIV-1 infected brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2000;99(4):376–84. doi: 10.1007/s004010051139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ernst T, Chang L, Jovicich J, Ames N, Arnold S. Abnormal brain activation on functional MRI in cognitively asymptomatic HIV patients. Neurology. 2002;59(9):1343–9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000031811.45569.b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chang L, Wong V, Nakama H, Watters M, Ramones D, Miller EN, et al. Greater than age-related changes in brain diffusion of HIV patients after 1 year. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2008;3(4):265–74. doi: 10.1007/s11481-008-9120-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang X, Foryt P, Ochs R, Chung JH, Wu Y, Parrish T, et al. Abnormalities in resting-state functional connectivity in early human immunodeficiency virus infection. Brain connectivity. 2011;1(3):207–17. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kallianpur KJ, Kirk GR, Sailasuta N, Valcour V, Shiramizu B, Nakamoto BK, et al. Regional Cortical Thinning Associated with Detectable Levels of HIV DNA. Cereb Cortex. 2011 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Hayashi KM, Toga AW, Lopez OL, Aizenstein HJ, et al. Thinning of the cerebral cortex visualized in HIV/AIDS reflects CD4+ T lymphocyte decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15647–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502548102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •23.Wendelken LA, Jahanshad N, Rosen HJ, Busovaca E, Allen I, Coppola G, et al. ApoE epsilon4 Is Associated With Cognition, Brain Integrity, and Atrophy in HIV Over Age 60. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;73(4):426–32. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001091. This study is one of the few associating the Alzheimer's disease risk gene with higher incidence of cognitive deficits and increased white matter atrophy in the brains of HIV-positive older adults. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Valcour V, Shikuma C, Shiramizu B, Watters M, Poff P, Selnes OA, et al. Age, apolipoprotein E4, and the risk of HIV dementia: the Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157(1-2):197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Green DA, Masliah E, Vinters HV, Beizai P, Moore DJ, Achim CL. Brain deposition of beta-amyloid is a common pathologic feature in HIV positive patients. AIDS. 2005;19(4):407–11. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000161770.06158.5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ellis RJ, Badiee J, Vaida F, Letendre S, Heaton RK, Clifford D, et al. CD4 nadir is a predictor of HIV neurocognitive impairment in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2011;25(14):1747–51. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834a40cd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, Brew BJ, Byrd DA, Cherner M, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69(18):1789–99. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000287431.88658.8b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Baldewicz TT, Leserman J, Silva SG, Petitto JM, Golden RN, Perkins DO, et al. Changes in neuropsychological functioning with progression of HIV-1 infection: results of an 8-year longitudinal investigation. AIDS Behav. 2004;8(3):345–55. doi: 10.1023/B:AIBE.0000044081.42034.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alexaki A, Liu Y, Wigdahl B. Cellular reservoirs of HIV-1 and their role in viral persistence. Curr HIV Res. 2008;6(5):388–400. doi: 10.2174/157016208785861195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Le Saux S, Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Mechanisms of immunosenescence: lessons from models of accelerated immune aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1247:69–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06297.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Woods SP, Moore DJ, Weber E, Grant I. Cognitive neuropsychology of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009;19(2):152–68. doi: 10.1007/s11065-009-9102-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Maruff P, Malone V, McArthur-Jackson C, Mulhall B, Benson E, Currie J. Abnormalities of visual spatial attention in HIV infection and the HIV-associated dementia complex. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;7(3):325–33. doi: 10.1176/jnp.7.3.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.York MK, Franks JJ, Henry RR, Hamilton WJ. Verbal working memory storage and processing deficits in HIV-1 asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Psychol Med. 2001;31(7):1279–91. doi: 10.1017/s0033291701004494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schiller A, Foley J, Burns W, Sellers AL, Golden C. Subcortical profile of memory compromise among HIV-1-infected individuals. The International journal of neuroscience. 2009;119(10):1779–803. doi: 10.1080/00207450903192860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Towgood KJ, Pitkanen M, Kulasegaram R, Fradera A, Kumar A, Soni S, et al. Mapping the brain in younger and older asymptomatic HIV-1 men: frontal volume changes in the absence of other cortical or diffusion tensor abnormalities. Cortex. 2012;48(2):230–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chang L, Holt JL, Yakupov R, Jiang CS, Ernst T. Lower cognitive reserve in the aging human immunodeficiency virus-infected brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34(4):1240–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Becker JT, Lopez OL, Dew MA, Aizenstein HJ. Prevalence of cognitive disorders differs as a function of age in HIV virus infection. AIDS. 2004;18(1):S11–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Iudicello JE, Woods SP, Deutsch R, Grant I, Group H. Combined effects of aging and HIV infection on semantic verbal fluency: A view of the cortical hypothesis through the lens of clustering and switching. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34(5):476–88. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.651103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Valcour V, Paul R, Neuhaus J, Shikuma C. The Effects of Age and HIV on Neuropsychological Performance. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011;17(1):190–5. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cysique LA, Maruff P, Bain MP, Wright E, Brew BJ. HIV and age do not substantially interact in HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;23(1):83–9. doi: 10.1176/jnp.23.1.jnp83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ances BM, Ellis RJ. Dementia and neurocognitive disorders due to HIV-1 infection. Seminars in neurology. 2007;27(1):86–92. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-956759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vidal-Pineiro D, Valls-Pedret C, Fernandez-Cabello S, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Sala-Llonch R, Solana E, et al. Decreased Default Mode Network connectivity correlates with age-associated structural and cognitive changes. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2014;6:256. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grady C. The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2012;13(7):491–505. doi: 10.1038/nrn3256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Young-Bernier M, Kamil Y, Tremblay F, Davidson PS. Associations between a neurophysiological marker of central cholinergic activity and cognitive functions in young and older adults. Behavioral and brain functions : BBF. 2012;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Betzel RF, Byrge L, He Y, Goni J, Zuo XN, Sporns O. Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage. 2014;102 Pt 2:345–57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Davis SW, Dennis NA, Daselaar SM, Fleck MS, Cabeza R. Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(5):1201–9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Goh JO. Functional Dedifferentiation and Altered Connectivity in Older Adults: Neural Accounts of Cognitive Aging. Aging and disease. 2011;2(1):30–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Freeman GB, Gibson GE. Dopamine, acetylcholine, and glutamate interactions in aging. Behavioral and neurochemical correlates. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;515:191–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb32984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Warburton DM, Rusted JM. Cholinergic control of cognitive resources. Neuropsychobiology. 1993;28(1-2):43–6. doi: 10.1159/000118998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bartus RT, Dean RL, 3rd, Beer B, Lippa AS. The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science. 1982;217(4558):408–14. doi: 10.1126/science.7046051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ellis JR, Ellis KA, Bartholomeusz CF, Harrison BJ, Wesnes KA, Erskine FF, et al. Muscarinic and nicotinic receptors synergystically modulate working memory and attention in humans. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006:175–89. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705005407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chau DT, Roth RM, Green AI. The neural circuitry of reward and its relevance to psychiatric disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2004;6(5):391–9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-004-0026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hollerman JR, Tremblay L, Schultz W. Involvement of basal ganglia and orbitofrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior. Progress in brain research. 2000;126:193–215. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Owen AM, Iddon JL, Hodges JR, Summers BA, Robbins TW. Spatial and non-spatial working memory at different stages of Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 1997;35(4):519–32. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00101-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Muller U, von Cramon DY, Pollmann S. D1- versus D2-receptor modulation of visuospatial working memory in humans. J Neurosci. 1998;18(7):2720–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-07-02720.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Marie RM, Barre L, Dupuy B, Viader F, Defer G, Baron JC. Relationships between striatal dopamine denervation and frontal executive tests in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett. 1999;260(2):77–80. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00928-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Volkow ND, Gur RC, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Moberg PJ, Ding YS, et al. Association between decline in brain dopamine activity with age and cognitive and motor impairment in healthy individuals. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155(3):344–9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.3.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Erixon-Lindroth N, Farde L, Wahlin TB, Sovago J, Halldin C, Backman L. The role of the striatal dopamine transporter in cognitive aging. Psychiatry Res. 2005;138(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Levin ED, Rose JE. Acute and chronic nicotinic interactions with dopamine systems and working memory performance. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;757:245–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb17481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dumas JA, Newhouse PA. The cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive aging revisited again: cholinergic functional compensation. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior. 2011;99(2):254–61. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Anglade P, Vyas S, Hirsch EC, Agid Y. Apoptosis in dopaminergic neurons of the human substantia nigra during normal aging. Histology and histopathology. 1997;12(3):603–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Newhouse PA, Potter A, Corwin J, Lenox R. Age-related effects of the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine on cognition and behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1994;10(2):93–107. doi: 10.1038/npp.1994.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vitiello B, Martin A, Hill J, Mack C, Molchan S, Martinez R, et al. Cognitive and behavioral effects of cholinergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic blockade in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1997;16(1):15–24. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(96)00134-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Drachman DA, Noffsinger D, Sahakian BJ, Kurdziel S, Fleming P. Aging, memory, and the cholinergic system: a study of dichotic listening. Neurobiol Aging. 1980;1(1):39–43. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(80)90022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schliebs R, Arendt T. The cholinergic system in aging and neuronal degeneration. Behav Brain Res. 2011;221(2):555–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sunderland T, Tariot PN, Newhouse PA. Differential responsivity of mood, behavior, and cognition to cholinergic agents in elderly neuropsychiatric populations. Brain Res. 1988;472(4):371–89. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91227-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mihailescu S, Drucker-Colin R. Nicotine, brain nicotinic receptors, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Arch Med Res. 2000;31(2):131–44. doi: 10.1016/s0188-4409(99)00087-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Picciotto MR, Zoli M. Nicotinic receptors in aging and dementia. J Neurobiol. 2002;53(4):641–55. doi: 10.1002/neu.10102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nieoullon A. Dopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention. Progress in Neurobiology. 2002;67(1):53–83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vink M, Kleerekooper I, van den Wildenberg WP, Kahn RS. Impact of aging on frontostriatal reward processing. Human brain mapping. 2015;36(6):2305–17. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tsang J, Fullard JF, Giakoumaki SG, Katsel P, Katsel P, Karagiorga VE, et al. The relationship between dopamine receptor D1 and cognitive performance. NPJ schizophrenia. 2015;1:14002. doi: 10.1038/npjschz.2014.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Stelzel C, Fiebach CJ, Cools R, Tafazoli S, D'Esposito M. Dissociable fronto-striatal effects of dopamine D2 receptor stimulation on cognitive versus motor flexibility. Cortex. 2013;49(10):2799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bolton JL, Marioni RE, Deary IJ, Harris SE, Stewart MC, Murray GD, et al. Association between polymorphisms of the dopamine receptor D2 and catechol-o-methyl transferase genes and cognitive function. Behavior genetics. 2010;40(5):630–8. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9372-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Nyberg L, Karalija N, Salami A, Andersson M, Wåhlin A, Kaboovand N, et al. Dopamine D2 receptor availability is linked to hippocampal–caudate functional connectivity and episodic memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(28):7918–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606309113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Abdulrahman H, Fletcher PC, Bullmore E, Morcom AM. Dopamine and memory dedifferentiation in aging. Neuroimage. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Guitart-Masip M, Salami A, Garrett D, Rieckmann A, Lindenberger U, Backman L. BOLD Variability is Related to Dopaminergic Neurotransmission and Cognitive Aging. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(5):2074–83. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhang S, Hu S, Chao HH, Li CS. Resting-State Functional Connectivity of the Locus Coeruleus in Humans: In Comparison with the Ventral Tegmental Area/Substantia Nigra Pars Compacta and the Effects of Age. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(8):3413–27. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Papenberg G, Backman L, Nagel IE, Nietfeld W, Schroder J, Bertram L, et al. COMT polymorphism and memory dedifferentiation in old age. Psychology and aging. 2014;29(2):374–83. doi: 10.1037/a0033225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Anderson BA, Kronemer SI, Rilee JJ, Sacktor N, Marvel CL. Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals. Neurobiology of disease. 2016;92(Pt B):157–65. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bracci L, Lozzi L, Rustici M, Neri P. Binding of HIV-1 gp120 to the nicotinic receptor. FEBS Lett. 1992;311(2):115–8. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81380-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ballester LY, Capo-Velez CM, Garcia-Beltran WF, Ramos FM, Vazquez-Rosa E, Rios R, et al. Up-regulation of the neuronal nicotinic receptor alpha7 by HIV glycoprotein 120: potential implications for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(5):3079–86. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.262543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Agrawal L, Louboutin JP, Marusich E, Reyes BA, Van Bockstaele EJ, Strayer DS. Dopaminergic neurotoxicity of HIV-1 gp120: reactive oxygen species as signaling intermediates. Brain Res. 2010;1306:116–30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Banks WA, Robinson SM, Nath A. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier to HIV-1 Tat. Exp Neurol. 2005;193(1):218–27. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Aylward EH, Henderer JD, McArthur JC, Brettschneider PD, Harris GJ, Barta PE, et al. Reduced basal ganglia volume in HIV-1-associated dementia: results from quantitative neuroimaging. Neurology. 1993;43(10):2099–104. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.10.2099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kumar AM, Fernandez JB, Singer EJ, Commins D, Waldrop-Valverde D, Ownby RL, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in the central nervous system leads to decreased dopamine in different regions of postmortem human brains. J Neurovirol. 2009;15(3):257–74. doi: 10.1080/13550280902973952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ances BM, Ortega M, Vaida F, Heaps J, Paul R. Independent Effects of HIV, Aging, and HAART on Brain Volumetric Measures. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(5):469–77. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318249db17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.DeVaughn S, Muller-Oehring EM, Markey B, Bronte-Stewart HM, Schulte T. Aging with HIV-1 Infection: Motor Functions, Cognition, and Attention--A Comparison with Parkinson's Disease. Neuropsychol Rev. 2015;25(4):424–38. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9305-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Alisky JM. The coming problem of HIV-associated Alzheimer's disease. Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(5):1140–3. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2007.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Moulignier A, Gueguen A, Lescure FX, Ziegler M, Girard PM, Cardon B, et al. Does HIV Infection Alter Parkinson Disease? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;70(2):129–36. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ciccarelli N, Limiti S, Fabbiani M, Baldonero E, Milanini B, Lamonica S, et al. Verbal list learning and memory profiles in HIV-infected adults, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease: An evaluation of the “cortical hypothesis” of NeuroAIDS. Applied neuropsychology Adult. 2016:1–10. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2016.1189424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Crane MK, Bogner HR, Brown GK, Gallo JJ. The link between depressive symptoms, negative cognitive bias and memory complaints in older adults. Aging & mental health. 2007;11(6):708–15. doi: 10.1080/13607860701368497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Alexopoulos GS. Depression in the elderly. Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1961–70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66665-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Sexton CE, McDermott L, Kalu UG, Herrmann LL, Bradley KM, Allan CL, et al. Exploring the pattern and neural correlates of neuropsychological impairment in late-life depression. Psychological Medicine. 2012;42(6):1195–202. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • •94.Moore RC, Fazeli PL, Jeste DV, Moore DJ, Grant I, Woods SP, et al. Successful cognitive aging and health-related quality of life in younger and older adults infected with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(6):1186–97. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0743-x. This study addresses how HIV-status and related cognitive deficits affect neuropsychological, psychiatric, and behavioral markers of quality of life differently in younger vs. older HIV-positive patients. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Milanini B, Catella S, Perkovich B, Esmaeili-Firidouni P, Wendelken L, Paul R, et al. Psychiatric symptom burden in older people living with HIV with and without cognitive impairment: the UCSF HIV over 60 cohort study. AIDS Care. 2017:1–8. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1281877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Justice AC, McGinnis KA, Atkinson JH, Heaton RK, Young C, Sadek J, et al. Psychiatric and neurocognitive disorders among HIV-positive and negative veterans in care: Veterans Aging Cohort Five-Site Study. AIDS. 2004;18(1):S49–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Majeed Z, van Wijngaarden E, Dolan JG, Shah KN. Depression partially mediated the relationship between basic psychological needs and quality of life among people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2017:1–5. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1300627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fumaz CR, Munoz-Moreno JA, Ferrer MJ, Gonzalez-Garcia M, Negredo E, Perez-Alvarez N, et al. Emotional impact of premature aging symptoms in long-term treated HIV-infected subjects. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(1):e5–8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31823ba503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Salem LC, Vogel A, Ebstrup J, Linneberg A, Waldemar G. Subjective cognitive complaints included in diagnostic evaluation of dementia helps accurate diagnosis in a mixed memory clinic cohort. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(12):1177–85. doi: 10.1002/gps.4272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Thompson CL, Henry JD, Rendell PG, Withall A, Brodaty H. How valid are subjective ratings of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia? Gerontology. 2015;61(3):251–7. doi: 10.1159/000371347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yates JA, Clare L, Woods RT, Matthews FE. Subjective Memory Complaints are Involved in the Relationship between Mood and Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;48(Suppl 1):S115–23. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Chartier M, Crouch PC, Tullis V, Catella S, Frawley E, Filanosky C, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: A Pilot Study of a Brief Screening Tool for Mild and Moderate Cognitive Impairment in HIV-Positive Veterans. Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. 2015;14(3):197–201. doi: 10.1177/2325957414557270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ••103.Kamkwalala A, Hulgan T, Newhouse P. Subjective memory complaints are associated with poorer cognitive performance in adults with HIV. AIDS Care. 2017;29(5):654–9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1248348. This study shows differences in the association between subjective memory complaints and objective cognitive performance in HIV-positive adults versus HIV-negative adults. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chang L, Jiang C, Cunningham E, Buchthal S, Douet V, Andres M, et al. Effects of APOE epsilon4, age, and HIV on glial metabolites and cognitive deficits. Neurology. 2014;82(24):2213–22. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Alisky JM. Could cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine alleviate HIV dementia? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38(1):113–4. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200501010-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Giunta B, Ehrhart J, Townsend K, Sun N, Vendrame M, Shytle D, et al. Galantamine and nicotine have a synergistic effect on inhibition of microglial activation induced by HIV-1 gp120. Brain Res Bull. 2004;64(2):165–70. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Simioni S, Cavassini M, Annoni JM, Metral M, Iglesias K, Rimbault Abraham A, et al. Rivastigmine for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: a randomized crossover pilot study. Neurology. 2013;80(6):553–60. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182815497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Valdes-Ferrer SI, Crispin JC, Belaunzaran PF, Cantu-Brito CG, Sierra-Madero J, Alcocer-Varela J. Acetylcholine-esterase inhibitor pyridostigmine decreases T cell overactivation in patients infected by HIV. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25(8):749–55. doi: 10.1089/aid.2008.0257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gotti C, Fornasari D, Clementi F. Human neuronal nicotinic receptors. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;53(2):199–237. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wonnacott S, Soliakov L, Wilkie G, Redfern P, Marshall D. Presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the brain. Drug Develop Res. 1996;38(3-4):149–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Marci M, Grilli M. Presynaptic nicotinic receptors modulating neurotransmitter release in the central nervous systemL Functional interactions with other coexisting receptors. Progress in Neurobiology. 2010:105–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wojna V, Robles L, Skolasky RL, Mayo R, Selnes O, de la Torre T, et al. Associations of cigarette smoking with viral immune and cognitive function in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women. J Neurovirol. 2007;13(6):561–8. doi: 10.1080/13550280701620747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Nesil T, Cao J, Yang Z, Chang SL, Li MD. Nicotine attenuates the effect of HIV-1 proteins on the neural circuits of working and contextual memories. Molecular brain. 2015;8:43. doi: 10.1186/s13041-015-0134-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Kamkwalala A, Newhouse PA. Beyond Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: Novel Cholinergic Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease. Current Alzheimer research. 2017;14(4):377–92. doi: 10.2174/1567205013666160930112625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hinkin CH, Castellon SA, Hardy DJ, Farinpour R, Newton T, Singer E. Methylphenidate improves HIV-1-associated cognitive slowing. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13(2):248–54. doi: 10.1176/jnp.13.2.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES